TLDW: I think the game is just... fine... so far at least. - The game is SUPER well optimized on PC. Great to see. - The multiplayer origins of the level design is pretty evident and often leads to small levels and awkward transitions between scenes. - In terms of Roleplaying it feels much closer to Fallout 4 than Old School Dragon Age... I'm told it's way more impactful later in the game, but we'll see. - Combat-wise, it's definitely spongey at times, but I don' think it's bad if you're spending enough time tweaking your build. Loot makes a difference and ability coordination is cool. - In terms of writing, THIS is the weakpoint. I think Jayvee and SkillUp are right in their estimations, but I also just think the energy is too low in most conversations. All the characters act like they've been awake for days, and it sucks the energy out of most conversations. - The cringe levels are much lower than I was braced for, but I'm sure I'll find more later in the game. Right now it's not a deal breaker at all despite what Twitter/X says. All in all, it's fine. It's not a masterpiece imo and it's not going to beat out 'Metaphor Re Fantazio' for GOTY for me, but I'm still having a good time. I'll keep playing and I hope it picks up! TLDR the TLDW: It's a junk food game. There's a lot of it, it all kinda tastes the same as other stuff you've eaten, it's not going to give you any sustenance, but you can easily munch until you get sick of it.
i tend to agree with this TLDR in a vaccum, and in a stand alone game i think i'd be willing to accept it. Its got the Dragon Age name attached to it though, and with that comes a certain expectation of quality. Not only that, but a certain expectation of respect for the name and world and lore of Dragon Age, and from what i've played it just doesn't have that. in a vacuum i'd probably even enjoy the game, but for every retconned or butchered theme/character that appears on screen from the old games, it just fills me with revulsion. its almost like a caricatured parody of what Dragon Age is.
Didn't even break 80k players on launch day.......for comparison Black Myth: Wukong had 2,415,714 concurrent players on launch. Cyberpunk had 1,054,388 concurrent players on launch. Elden Ring had 952,523 concurrent on launch. Hogwart's Legacy had 879,308. Baldur's Gate 3 had 875,343 on full release. Starfield had 330,723.
The problem is simply that in one of the biggest RPG FRANCHISE in Gaming that the Dialogue/Wiriting (which is literally one of the most important for this genre) is horrible. I would rather have the combat be horrible and the writing be amazing, honestly. It really does just seem like a junk food game and makes you wonder whether Andromeda is any better than this
You're telling me you don't want to hear a character lecture you on how you should punish yourself and perform a humiliation ritual because apologizing is not enough? Blasphemy!
I bought Andromeda on sale for like 5 bucks, years after it came out, because I was told "at least the combat is fun". I quit the game about midway through because the writing could not carry it. Was not even worth that 5 bucks.
@@CherryJuli Being 'mean' would imply you could insult your companions (until they leave/attack you); I don't want Taash/Bellara in my group as they're both incredibly obnoxious characters. In a 'real' RPG we would, for example, have the option to tell Taash we don't care about pronouns & that she can deal with it or leave...or tell Bellara she's incredibly irritating, and ask if she can stop her endless prattling. For Taash, seems the 'best' you get is ignoring their side quest = they 'heroically-unalive' in act 3...for a bad ending ofc - if you want the good ending you have to affirm the 'they/them' in their side quest.
You mention that "as long as you're not looking for the super intense roleplay, you'll be fine" when this is Dragon Age, from Bioware. That roleplay is supposed to be the damn point.
I get what you're saying, but I'll take what they have given because of the complete shit show this game went through behind the scenes. If this is successful as it seems to be, hopefully Bioware can make the next Mass Effect game the way they want to instead of having to remake the game twice because of EA's meddling.
@@VampireKa1n apparently, it's not that "form" we all remember from DAO. But then again, how long ago was that? Dragon Age changed directions in 2011 with DA2, it was so obvious which route they are going with this franchise that the complaints about the new game not being like Origins are weird.
@@GreyMagee74 No a lot of this silly ideological nonsense comes directly from bioware itself, so the same team will still produce the same garbage writing for a mass effect.
I am interested to see what this new type of thinking will do with ME. At this point I just look forward to my franchise’s burning. The money has to drop-down to a new Phoenix to get born at this rate.
I think I just need to accept that I'm not the target audience for this new dragon age. Seems more like it's aimed at the same audience as a young adult novel.
I accidentally made my character trans and then saved. I can’t undo it. I didn’t mean to convert my identity. But now my character that I designed to be masculine is now a trans woman. Am I able to undo this? Hopefully a mod? Ug
I need to clarify that I don't agree with any of the transphobic rhetoric that these games tend to attract online. I only meant that the writing is meant to be on grade level for people in 6th-8th grade.
@@terrythegnome2408 i dunno terry, i watched a stream for 2 hrs yesterday and the dialogue was pret-ty bad. Glad you're enjoying it though. I'm not so salty that I don't want other people to have a good time!
"Man I've just had a really rough day..." "That fucking sucks. Wanna go get drunk and talk about it?" THAT seems like it would fit very well here. People being real and also giving you a shoulder to lean on. Platitudes are platitudes for a reason, don't overuse them or they become cliche'd. We wanna connect with NPCs and enjoy talking with them.
I think the "HR" talk is the big problem in many games today. It immediately makes you roll your eyes and keeps things boring. I hope the industry can go away from this to make games more interesting in the future. The rest of the game looks decent (outside some cringy scenes I've seen). I get a Hogwarts Legacy vibe with combat every video I see which isn't a bad thing.
Meanwhile, I'm playing BG3 and Red Dead Redemption 1 on PC now, and that dialogue and writing is just... hardcore. It holds no punches, dilutes nothing down for soft people. Doesn't push agendas down your throat and lecture you. Actually has a decent ark, with decent antagonists etc.
i don't think i've ever seen something so purple before. zero hyperbole; it's bizarre. like i sincerely wanna know how the hell they were able to make it look purple even when it.. doesn't seem to look purple? IT'S SO PURPLE!
I don't really get why people think 75-77k peak players for a AAA major franchise RPG from a major studio that's been in development for 7-10 years is impressive. It's likely going to peak at 100k over the weekend, which is almost half of what Dragon's Dogma achieved on Steam, and that's a more obscure mainly Playstation title. It's one third of Starfield, which was on game pass, and one eighth of BG3. They can invent all kinds of PR lingo such as "Most successful Bioware Steam release!" but if it caps out at 100k over the weekend that's just a major disappointment and I can't imagine the studio or publisher will be happy with that. Calling the long-awaited fourth installment of freaking Dragon Age a "junk food game" isn't the glowing recommendation you think it is. We need to expect more or studios will keep on churning out mediocre slop. I want this to be a good game and succeed if only because the future of Mass Effect 5 hinges on it. What I've seen doesn't give me much hope at all.
The game is also on EA Play tbf so we won't have an accurate number for a while. The only comparison is likely Starfield which still had 300k players, I dunno if 1/3 of Starfields number will be seen as a success.
Wouldn't be bad numbers if it didn't take 7-10 years to make how many times has this game had to restart development from scratch or scrape ideas it's budget is probably way more than then starfield and bg3 combined
If the writing was just mediocre I could handle it, because the rest of the game is fairly serviceable, I’d say 6-7/10 ish. But the writing is aggressive in its lack of quality and preachiness and the lack of any real choice is antithetical to the BioWare I grew up with
I always played DA for the story and the writing. There is no point in playing and fighting trough levels if the "reward" is bad writing and just sucks.
Yeah the lack of genuine choice is shocking. I was watching a stream and was amazed at how little agency the player had over events in the game. Even small events.
Yea, the lack of choice is what breaks it for me, the rest I can get used to. Bioware was known for AAA games with real choice and consequences until they watered it down starting from ME2.
Luke..... if you're "having a good time", and it's "fine", why are you even considering not finishing the game? C'mon man, it sounds like you're trying reeeeeeally hard to be diplomatic.... when what you really think is : all in all mediocre.
He is a hater that monetizes popular hate for money and views....this is just another normal video for luke siht*ng on a game like he always does....even if it is in a "diplomatic " way!
ya the problem with turning a UA-cam hobby into a full career, you feed your family with that money you sometimes cant afford to lose sponsors or connections. which in turn gives us inaccurate info (not that he is here). same with gaming journalism kind of, its a rough cycle. thats why id never rely on it 100%.
Not about this game, but the point itself is not that hypocritical. Sometimes the game is objectively good, but not to your taste, that's why you can have some time in-game, but not finish it.
Some people say that we shouldn't hate on mid/slop games because they are not terrible and people can find fun in them, but if you work on a game for like 5-6 years and spend 200+mil on it then don't be satisfied with just slop "junk food" quality. This game could have been Baldur's Gate 3 level, and captured a new audience who never played Dragon Age or any RPG before, but its just meh like Andromeda was (at least its not broken and riddled with bugs like that game was), yeah there probably are new people trying it but there are also old fans of the franchise who will never even try it, based on the perceived quality of it and the way they handled this sequel.
The first thing that came to my mind with this game was : " Oh yeah, I remember Sacred 3, someone did it again..." , now I'm going to cry and reinstall DA:O
I've said it before and i'll say it again. Every Character interaction in this game feels like its straight up from a Scooby Doo episode. Rooks natural response should be "Zoinks" or "Jinkies" for all the good the actual dialogue tree gives you.
Luke is misquoting Matt and Ralf. It wasn’t that they turned down the difficulty later because they got spongy later, they turned it down and wished they turned it down earlier saying all the enemies were spungy.
@ they said the combat felt like both, but the reason specifically they turned down the difficulty was because spongy enemies artificially made the combat longer. They said at no point was it hard.
I tried it, but the story, dialogue, and retconning of the world at large just made me request my first ever refund. The voice acting was god awful and the tone a bit too chipper.
I don’t know that I’d say the tone is chipper. Idk how far you got but the game still has a lot of that darkness to it. That hopelessness and that despair that innocent people are dying. But still has a little bit of that snarky sarcastic attitude that is very common in marvel movies. I like it so far. I think a lot of people are expecting origins again and that’s just never going to happen. If people look at it as a hope of old school BioWare revival then you’re going to be disappointed.
@@saintjames1995 I’m going to assume you haven’t played the game cause there is an entire town covered in blight and you can hear sounds of people getting suffocated and people being stabbed through their chests and hung. So yes there is a dark theme too it. The game doesn’t have to be constantly dark and depression to have a darker tone.
@nathanfortun5768 literally one dark area doesn't make the tone dark. And my wife got to that area and they were still making quips the whole fucking time
Gotta keep the wife happy. Gotta try and keep that corporate access. Wouldn't be surprised if the mild ass critique he gave when he went to the preview event blacklisted him from getting the review copy.
I mean, he has to review things fairly and review a game for the game. As a fan of previous dragon age titles, I'm not impressed by the game. But many people seem to like it. If he just shit on the game for 20 minutes, with a biased view, that would defeat the point of such a video.
Yes. Dragon Age is supposed to be dark, rough, death everywhere. I'm really sad that I'm not gonna play this title and this probably ends my Dragon Age "fanatism".
70k concurrent is not that great, either. Elden Ring, Cyberpunk, hell, the Monster Hunter Wilds Beta all released on a workday. Elden ring had almost a million concurrent players on release, Cyberpunk had one million, and the Wilds beta had 450k playing it yesterday. Cyberpunk is probably the most applicable. It was not an established IP when it came out, unlike Dragon Age, and it absolutely crushes Veilguard's numbers. To say it seems to be doing pretty well is not really evaluating the situation. If you do not want to pan it, fine, but do not say it's doing well when it clearly is not.
@@FlxKomp To an extent yes, but also not wanting to burn bridges with BioWare/EA and lose early access to their games. Gotta play nice or no review codes or event invites for you.
So much copium I keep seeing in every review. "It's fine. It's not Dragon Age nor an RPG, but it's fine. It doesn't crash and it works. It's fine. The graphics are nice, but the art sucks, but it's fine. The overall story is good, but all the dialog in an RPG game sucks. It's fine."
a balanced take isn’t “copium” what is wrong with you people? it’s like having a lukewarm/mild opinion isn’t okay anymore, why do you see the world so myopically?
@@cutenihilist He craps all over other games that are 6 to 7.5 level games. Makes me wonder why he's so forgiving of this one. Paid off or just afraid to offend the wrong industry people?
It's copium when you're lamenting how it isn't anything like the game you wanted and you keep saying, "it's fine, it's fine." It's not fine, it's not a balanced take. And who said anything about it not being okay to have a lukewarm opinion? Why do you see the world like a victim?
@cutenihilist that's an interesting take from someone with nihilist in their name. This is like his third video not counting the livestreams talking about this game that is just "fine".Something is clearly not fine and it's not the same thing for Luke and the audience. No one comes to a 20 minute review expecting no substantive opinions. He even uses innuendo to cover the controversies instead of just reporting the facts. He's clearly a shill trying to cope. If Luke was the only guy I went to for game info, I wouldn't know half of what was going on around this game.
I had it pre-ordered, but was waiting for reviews to make a final decision. After everything I saw from the day reviews went up to release, I ended up canceling it. If I ever do pick it up, it would be when it's heavily on sale. At the very least I was able to move the money I spent on pre-ordering to getting Metaphor ReFantazio , which I've heard good things about.
20:05 we know why they did it. Pretend you can't put 2 and 2 together if you want, be we all know why they did it. Play ball with them if you want to keep your access, but you're not fooling anyone.
The modern day conversation does bother me, not in a way that other people are bothered by, but it just breaks immersion, I mean nobody talks like that in ancient times! Unless you are Marty McFly
yes, i remember the use of the word "stuff" common... really... it's true it breaks immersion constantly earing modern words that don't belong in a medieval fantasy universe
Yeah but that's why people are mad, even if they don't realize it. Nobody would care if the game was good. I watched "Hackers" the other day and like half the characters in that were some form of LGBTQ but nobody complained because it contributed to the story, it didn't bring the plot to a screeching halt. Make a good game with a good story, then add whatever ESG stuff you want. Some will still complain, sure, but you will make all the money.
DA veilguard is not bad only because it's kind of so-so, it's bad because it comes as a final nail in the coffin of what the dragon age franchise could have been, and what everyone was expecting since origins. inquisition was not bad either, it was just disappointing as it was supposed to come as a healing for the franchise after DA2 which weirdly start to get some recognition as more and more other episodes release. No dragon age game is "bad". They just increase or decrease in value as people get disappointed by new opus, which today put Origin as a legendary status
@@Mkrause762 I liked it at the time. In hindsight (I'm talking since ME Andromeda), it had some telltale signs of where BioWare was going in the near future. Kind of taints my perception of the game.
Totally got to disagree with you on the art style. Show me one person that has played a previous Dragon Age game and likes the look of the new Qunari. Every single one looks awful and like megamind with horns
Yea both the character style choices and the overall graphics presentation. The characters are not only rough on the eyes but look like they're made out of plastic or hard rubber. Very Pixar/Fortnite. The environments look pretty good for the most part though I'll give them credit there.
I actually like the new style more, but obviously it's a personal taste thing - I only played the OG dragon age for a handful of hours back on 360 on a CRT and it looked like mud so it's not like im a hardcore fan or anything.
12 minutes in and you're still being too lenient on the game. A whole lot of word salad with pretty much no meaning here. If we go by that, then either you like the game and don't want criticism for it, your friends/family like the game and don't wanna piss them off or you'd rather pander to corporations for early access to games. No, I don't expect you to just rip the game a new asshole, I just expected you to get to the damn point instead of beating around the bush. It seems everyone who's talking about the game is either like you or just flat out shitting on it because "PrOnOuNs" and surgery scars are an option in it... don't know why I bother watching independent discussions or reviews on games anymore when you all are getting to the low levels of journalists that are affiliated with the likes of IGN and whatnot.
I almost feel bad for the writers because they're going to be getting shit on for years to come because of it. But yeah, they do not understand how to write human beings.
@@universe1225 Then, they need to learn how to write (and in the meantime suffer us), bc they should not have a writer's job if they cannot do the job. This is really incompetent work, sadly.
@@marconeves1979 I doubt it was actually the writers fault. As with the dialogue ingame, I bet "HR was in the room" most of the time and approved (or not) every line to be perfectly safe. Having to be a writer for such corporations must be a living hell.
Dragon age was always woke. And that was okay because the writing around those aspects weren’t insufferable. In fact they were done quite well. They handled gay and trans characters in a great way. I’m a far left liberal but good god man I HATE this. Everything is shoved down your throat and I can hear the writers just thinking “me me me” with every word that comes out of the characters mouths This is what people who scream “woke” are talking about. It’s cringy. It’s out of place. It’s hypocritical and, it’s so fucking annoying.
I’ve watched enough of the dialogue to know it is painfully cringeworthy. I can’t get through a RPG when I’m rolling my eyes every time they talk. This looks and sounds like a game made for teenage girls.
I thought that 70k was only steam users? Would like to know total sales vs just peak players because there may be people who’ve bought it and haven’t started yet
@@jordynlewis3865 My friend, most steam games like Black Myth Wukong which had over a million and even Starfield which had 300,000 players on launch which is what everyone talks about. Those numbers are even higher if we're counting sales outside of steam.
Lost me at 70k is a very good "mid week" number, my guy more people were playing mhw beta if you get outplayed by a beta it's not been a successful launch Edit: well the weekend is here and the numbers are still shit lol
BG3 peaked at 100k yesterday, veilguard couldnt get over 90k. a singleplayer game released well over a year ago having more concurrant players than a major AAA release on first weekend is terrible. especially concidering the budget.
Dragon Age didn't really regress, I think. It's just that those of us who played Origins, Two and Inquisition when it came out matured. Like, Origins has a great world building but dialogue writing wasn't as good as we're all making it out to be now and very cringy at times. I was a middle-schooler during Origins. Inquisition came out a decade ago. It's just that the games didn't age with us.
But there are currently more players on steam than inquisitions all time peak. So it would seem they didn’t shrink the player base by more than half. Cause it’s already bigger. Not even a dragon age fan but you guys just say anything.
@gabrielolsen2648 Inquisition wasn't available on Steam until well after its initial release. I guarantee this game isn't going to even hit half the sales of Inquisition.
Inquisition's implementation of open world maps made most of the game feel like a chore. At least the map design has been significantly improved. The bits and pieces I've heard of the soundtrack make it seem as though the game has significantly improved in that department as well. Inquisition had some bangers but during most of the game all you hear is ambient music even if you're in combat. There seems to be some really solid combat music in this one. It's too bad the writing and gameplay mechanics seem to have either gone further in the wrong direction or remained the more or less the same.
I'm 31, I've played every bioware rpg since kotor. I'm about 20 hours into the veilguard and I just feel like some of the criticism has been a little bit hyperbolic. The writing to me has been quite engaging, the characters are fun and interesting (we will see where they go). I have not met the super controversial one yet. But everything else about the game has been absolutely superb. No bioware rpg has been some deep role playing experience outside of origins and even that game isn't bg3 levels of role playing. Not sure what people expected here. Feel like I'm playing a different game then some of these other folks lol. Different strokes for different folks I suppose. Gunna play metaphor after this. Ps. Love you Luke! Your the best!
It died with inquisition. People supporting the red flags all over that game resulted in a bioware that truly believed they were headed in the right direction, that's how we got Andromeda and now this abandoned corpse called veilguard.
@@randomguy6679 dragon age 2 was a good game. It suffered from a very limited set of scenarios and the combat was not as tactical as origins(which some people actually welcomed) but other than that the plot, pacing, structure, lore, characters designs, companions, quests and side quests were all great. DA2 is definitely not a bad game, it has way more positives than negatives. Oh and the initial lack of a dedicated archer character was idiotic.
69k peak players for a game with that budget with heavily mixed reviews is not going to be great for the tail of this games sales. It could take a very long time to even approach breaking even on the balance sheet.
I'm torn as reviews are decent but all the clips I have seen are dull mcu style humour or strange social commentary. Please tell me most of the game is 'serious' in tone?
It's not. Many reviewers mentioned that DAVG doesn't really have deep, serious or dark moments with few shallow exceptions, but these exceptions are just cliches, like "It's really quiet here... Too quiet".
Don't trust the reviews from the gaming journalists. Watch YT videos of gameplay instead and decide by yourself. I saw enough clips to be sure that I will never touch this game
If u still rely on reviews from "game journalists", u are the target audience for this game. Never ever trust an official game review from the likes of IGN or Eurogamer or whatever and always look for content creators reviews on youtube.
Played about 3h yesterday (mostly of that in the character creator, so about an hour and a half of actual gameplay) and let's just say that the dialogue is very... em... got me eye rolling multiple times. It mostly feels like people who wrote the game didn't play previous games but skimmed wiki page about them and rolled with it (elven role got retconned so badly I wanted to cry). Also yeah. They are trying to be funny. But. Em. It's not really working. So like what's happening might be serious but the characters have like... Zero braincells. I feel like a teenage me that had been there for every MCU premiere might have been more forgiving but 25yo me, who writes as a hobby is like... They seriously got paid for this? So far, the closest this game falls for me, is literally Hogwarts Legacy (which was fine, I had fun, didn't have much expectations, and really liked like one plotline) where I didn't pay much attention to dialogue, but was there to enjoy the views. That and like fanfiction, but the ones I open and close 5 pages in, because it just... so meh.
11:50 I strongly disagree with this take. From a gameplay perspective it soft locks you with the same party the longer you play, because you don't want to "loose" levels by switching up partymembers. From a storytelling perspective, it tells the players that people outside his party are not doing anything noteworthy without him around to see it, which (at least in my eyes) is bad storytelling.
To put the some 70,000 people playing Veilguard into perspective: that's about the same number that Baldur's Game 3 has at the same time. A game that came out over a year ago, is supposed to have the same target audience and peaked well over 800,000.
baldurs gate 3 had a looooong early access period. People already knew the game would be absolutely amazing well ahead of time. Comparing this to BG3 is disingenous. Also, The internet has aleady decided to hate this game well before release because its EA and bioware. It never had a shot. And that's too bad. it's actually a really solid game.
@@frankhemstra634 If you believe anyone out there would hate a game simply because it is from BioWare, you have to be extremely new to video gaming (definitely post-2014). In this case, I might get an understanding of why you would consider something like Veilguard a "really solid game".
There's a lot of things I have that I can complain about with this game. A lot. But one thing is chief amongst them. Why the hell are art directors so afraid of making dwarves look like goddamn dwarves? What's wrong with massive bedazzled beards? Who gives a shit about some minor clipping, I want to feel like a DWARF. I'm getting tired of only having Vermintide 2 to fulfill my dwarf-beard-to-the-ground experience. Get a grip and make a fucking dwarf!
I've just been watching someone play this and omg, straight line, follow the leader who never stops talking absolute drivel. Did an AI write the dialogue? Quest markers are literally pointed out like you're a five year old and have to be hand held all the way.
The quest markers is a setting so.. if you are going to talk shit about something please know what you are talking about. Love or hate the game idc but Jesus Christ it’s ridiculous how people can talk shit but be so unaware of what they are talking about.
it should bother in every way its pretentious and agenda pushing cause its a echo chamber company that hires based on if they tow the line, leading to no push back on any idea leading to dialogue where everything is super kind and no push back language except when it suits them
What happened to writers? Where are you? Why are they so captured with just bad dialogue and stupid world views and shoving them into storylines? Who is hired and who are they writing for? I just don’t get it
An issue in a lot of entertainment nowadays is writers writing for themselves, things they wanna see/play, not as a product to be sold. Then they'll say "it's not for you" whilst simultaneously blaming you for not buying it.
@@RumblesBettr Well so we have an interesting conundrum on our hands. Since you agree it's JUST a comment, why you telling the op to relax? It was just a comment. The op must be relaxed then.
I think what makes me cynically chuckle about the trans questline is the fact that even black identity issues can't get a questline this authentic in a AAA game. Even Rockstar refused to do it with RDR2. It really illuminates where the priorities lie in the industry.
This cringey, YA and fanfic-influenced sludge writing has been forced into the ears of players (and viewers, when including TV and movies) for YEARS. WE DO NOT WANT IT ANYMORE. I know writers like to exclusively endear themselves to people that are like them, but do companies realize that general audiences are sick of this current trend?!
This man is talking about the game in hr speak my god the game is BAD if you can’t role play in an RPG which is the whole POINT of the game and series especially if the writing is so ass and so not in the world this was one of my favorite game series cause of the world and characters and story and they completely ripped it all away and disrespected us and the series as a WHOLE this really upset me this was one of my childhood games I beat all three games on each console it’s one of the reasons I LOVE RPGs so much and got me into the genre and seeing it like this broke my heart and spirit and after hearing about what’s going on in the studio I’m not surprised and definitely have no hope for mass effect which sucks even more
Objectively i agree it looks fine ish. Subjectively i hate the character design, the tone shift, and the pivot away from dragon age's rpg roots. definitely not a game i care to play through personally, but would definitely still be interested to see a full review.
My biggest issue, as someone who played and enjoyed all 3 games and their DLC's, is that only three of my choices are going to count in the game. I get it is sort of a soft reboot that also wraps up the storyline but instead of Mass Effect 3 level of your past choices coming back and being acknowledged it's a game that really is not going to recognize my world state. It makes it feel like the last 3 games were for nothing and I don't really hear people complain about it.
Baldur's Gate 3 feels like it was written by people who love their craft and have spent years working on it. Dragon Age feels like it was written by people who don't love their craft as much as they have things to say. They should stick to the forums and leave writing to actual writers.
I will say from the looks of it they certainly populated areas with enough random NPC's and such. Hate when games have a city or town with like... ~50 people in it.
@Saulgoodman94 no bro only watched skillup video and Lukes video i wanted to make sure if its a game worth my 70 dollars hard earned money and now I know it is not worth it but good for you if you liked it have fun ✌️
@@Dooger414 as if your single purchase has any affect on the games performance or even your comment can dissuade people who were gonna originally buy the game. If you don’t like something just stfu and move on. Simple as that. Do you go to every single movie theater and whine at the entrance about how you didn’t like a certain movie?
for comparison Black Myth: Wukong had 2,415,714 concurrent players on launch. Cyberpunk had 1,054,388 concurrent players on launch. Elden Ring had 952,523 concurrent on launch. Hogwart's Legacy had 879,308. Baldur's Gate 3 had 875,343 on full release. Starfield had 330,723.
Yeah 70k is super super weak for a AAA game with a massive budget, by a major well known developer, and an established well known franchise with a fairly sizable fanbase. 70k is atrocious. I’ll be surprised if it breaks 125k on steam at any point in the whole launch weekend
I disagree with it selling well. If you compare it to triple A mega titles like Witcher 3, Baldur's Gate 3, Cyberpunk, Elden Ring, Ghost of Tsushimitata... even Double As like Helldivers 2 and Space Marines 2... it sold comparatively worse. While having a larger budget. WHILE the prior Dragon Age titles out sold all the prior titles of the games I just brought up. It's not good, man.
having only the companions you bring with you gain EXP is a terrible idea. what fucking year is it, that's PS2 game design. What if you start with a character realise you hate them so you want to change but now the level difference makes you feel like you cant. In BG3 I used lae'zel for awhile because I felt like I needed a fighter. The second I found karlach I decapitated Lae'zel.
Easy skip for me. Artstyle, Character models, and most importantly dialogue and role playing elements are very important to me when it comes to an rpg. I dont play Bioware games for their gameplay. I play for the companions, story, and immersing myself in the world. And it seems that is the weakest part of Veilguard.
There's a reason lots of reviewers didn't get review codes, don't be naive. They knew how divisive the lackluster writing and modernity would be and they tried to hide it to protect their pre-orders. It's really not that hard to understand.
My main issue with how the game performs overall is both from narrative standpoint and a gameplay standpoint. Think of the previous game dragon age acquisition the very beginning of the game main menu has emphatic, ambience, music powerful accord, a symbol, a new journey, a new strange time you see marches of crowds of soldiers walking to the chantry. The voice acting in the game is some of the best for dragon age. Overall, each of the characters put emphasis on what they’re saying, the strength of the urgency of the direness of the situation when Cassandra tells you that there’s a giant fucking hole in the sky and that all hell is breaking loose people are losing faith and you’re the only one you have the inquisitor not at point mentioned, but you’re the only one who can solve it. Then you have Liliana the spymaster trying to logic reason you are met with a wonderful cast at the start each independent each strong of their own right and it doesn’t matter about the wellness of an agenda or what not I could care less about any of that. Hell you could bang anyone and have relations with same-sex characters and otherwise but they were well written well loved well received. Sure Veilguard looks good. It’s the best series has ever looked graphically and atmospherically that can’t be denied but all that fall flat if there’s no good writing behind it, all the characters seem more one-dimensional one painstakingly brushstroke after another. You had much much more exploration in dragon agent acquisition the whole of the southern status was yours to explore. You could keep going to places checking out different little bits of location trying out new characters to see what new reactions you could do a lot of things. Every small decision you made even getting the logging camp for the starting area basically changed the ability for you to do certain things later on in the game if you hadn’t done it, you wouldn’t have gotten certain upgrade that you needed it. I’m sure it’s nice to see some fan favorite characters return however there is a massive disregard to everyone that was part of the biggest force assembled for a single villain. I will give the new game kudos to improving the ability and passive system as opposed to dragon age inquisition, and making the combat more streamlined and more fun. Veilguard going the route of a linear story with linear areas to explore really diminishes the overall field of what dragon age had. I mean, we as a community halfway to 10+ years since the trespasser DLC to finally get a resolution to the dread wolf the new game takes all of our choices from the past other three titles and throws them into obscurity saying fuck it. Eight years happened since the last big event times have changed whatever move on and that is it there could’ve been a better implementation of the new team in new characters new styling new ways to make them feel more alive, but everyone is so one dimensionally focused. And don’t even get me started on the fact that the new game basically takes the Mass Effect two loyalty system and puts it into basically the magic version gameplay of Mass Effect and Andromeda all that for the final resolution to dragon age is a hole. I’m 26 right now, if you had told me when I was 16, 10 years ago when inquisition launched that this is what I would have to be looking forward to I wouldn’t want it in the first place I would’ve never even asked for it simply because it’s just not worth it at all. There’s no substance. It’s more so a jelly filled donut that’s filled withonly half the jelly sure there’s some things you like here in there but realistically it’s an empty game it’s a shell of whatever it should’ve been. The most I’m willing to realistically give the new game is a 5.5 out of 10. and the rest of the story of kills off for me in the end.
Luke... Just one request... Do a straight comparison of Baldur's Gate 3 and this game in every aspect. Even wanted to associate their game with something similar to BG3. Please do one and all things will be clear...
@@Yuuki_Asuna not sure about that lol but this game is going to make it “not a massive IP”. They keep burning bridges game after game. Ubisoft and BioWare need an overhaul of personnel or they will go by the wayside.
(8:28) With respect dude, they're not "more linear levels", they ARE linear levels.. There is NOTHING open world or even semi-open world about these levels.. quit blurring the truth. This game is SO obscenely far from what anyone would expect from a dragon age game in almost every single way, that we may as well not call it one.
7:30 I started the game where enemies have less health but deal more damage and that balance worked great for me. Made it a interactive with combat and kept it short
20 minute video just for this dude to sidestep any real thoughts or critique is just a waste of my time. I won't watch anymore of Lukes videos since he seem to be more about being neutral than having a damn opinion about something.
TLDW:
I think the game is just... fine... so far at least.
- The game is SUPER well optimized on PC. Great to see.
- The multiplayer origins of the level design is pretty evident and often leads to small levels and awkward transitions between scenes.
- In terms of Roleplaying it feels much closer to Fallout 4 than Old School Dragon Age... I'm told it's way more impactful later in the game, but we'll see.
- Combat-wise, it's definitely spongey at times, but I don' think it's bad if you're spending enough time tweaking your build. Loot makes a difference and ability coordination is cool.
- In terms of writing, THIS is the weakpoint. I think Jayvee and SkillUp are right in their estimations, but I also just think the energy is too low in most conversations. All the characters act like they've been awake for days, and it sucks the energy out of most conversations.
- The cringe levels are much lower than I was braced for, but I'm sure I'll find more later in the game. Right now it's not a deal breaker at all despite what Twitter/X says.
All in all, it's fine. It's not a masterpiece imo and it's not going to beat out 'Metaphor Re Fantazio' for GOTY for me, but I'm still having a good time. I'll keep playing and I hope it picks up!
TLDR the TLDW:
It's a junk food game. There's a lot of it, it all kinda tastes the same as other stuff you've eaten, it's not going to give you any sustenance, but you can easily munch until you get sick of it.
i tend to agree with this TLDR in a vaccum, and in a stand alone game i think i'd be willing to accept it. Its got the Dragon Age name attached to it though, and with that comes a certain expectation of quality. Not only that, but a certain expectation of respect for the name and world and lore of Dragon Age, and from what i've played it just doesn't have that.
in a vacuum i'd probably even enjoy the game, but for every retconned or butchered theme/character that appears on screen from the old games, it just fills me with revulsion. its almost like a caricatured parody of what Dragon Age is.
Yes sir Metaphor for the W!
Kinda sad tho I was expecting more from dragon age veil guard....in part 4 or chapter 4 currently and its just okay
Didn't even break 80k players on launch day.......for comparison
Black Myth: Wukong had 2,415,714 concurrent players on launch. Cyberpunk had 1,054,388 concurrent players on launch. Elden Ring had 952,523 concurrent on launch. Hogwart's Legacy had 879,308. Baldur's Gate 3 had 875,343 on full release. Starfield had 330,723.
The problem is simply that in one of the biggest RPG FRANCHISE in Gaming that the Dialogue/Wiriting (which is literally one of the most important for this genre) is horrible. I would rather have the combat be horrible and the writing be amazing, honestly. It really does just seem like a junk food game and makes you wonder whether Andromeda is any better than this
I would love a full review, I don’t particularly trust anyone else with their opinions of the game
I'm in my mid 20's. When I get home I just want to play a game. I don't want to hear the insufferable people I work with in my video games.
Add 20 more years, and it’s much worse😂😂
And nowadays you have to put up with that bullshite in games, movies, tv shows, novels... It's maddening.
You're telling me you don't want to hear a character lecture you on how you should punish yourself and perform a humiliation ritual because apologizing is not enough? Blasphemy!
Play Metaphor. Amazing game.
@@jimmymurphy898yep
You know, it's like going to a family owned Italian Restaurant for years, only to find out one day the place was bought and turned into McDonalds.
Damn, that's the closest anyone has come to putting my feelings into words. Cheers.
Mc PIzza
I don't care how good the combat is or how good it looks. If I gotta listen to hours of bad voice acting and worse writing, it's not worth my time.
This is where I'm at.
I play Bioware games for the writing. If that's not here in Vailguard. If I'm not excited to play every side quest.
Ya... No.
but we have to read your worse writting, too
I bought Andromeda on sale for like 5 bucks, years after it came out, because I was told "at least the combat is fun". I quit the game about midway through because the writing could not carry it. Was not even worth that 5 bucks.
Go watch the Godfather
@@jesseM138 your own mistake ;)
I mean they said the story is boring, what did you expect? Btw, do you have any constructive criticism?
- you can't be mean
- your choices aren't impactful
- the dialogue is dry and annoying as fuck
How exactly are you supposed to role play at all ?
Sounds like most other RPGs, Bioware never much more choice than a telltale game, but like telltale, they used to write really good stories.
You can be mean though
@@CherryJuli Being 'mean' would imply you could insult your companions (until they leave/attack you); I don't want Taash/Bellara in my group as they're both incredibly obnoxious characters. In a 'real' RPG we would, for example, have the option to tell Taash we don't care about pronouns & that she can deal with it or leave...or tell Bellara she's incredibly irritating, and ask if she can stop her endless prattling.
For Taash, seems the 'best' you get is ignoring their side quest = they 'heroically-unalive' in act 3...for a bad ending ofc - if you want the good ending you have to affirm the 'they/them' in their side quest.
@@HS-ze4ywWait, they unalive themselves because you won’t affirm their pronouns?
🤣🤣🤣 sorry, that’s f-ing hilarious
You don't, It'a not an RPG.
You mention that "as long as you're not looking for the super intense roleplay, you'll be fine" when this is Dragon Age, from Bioware.
That roleplay is supposed to be the damn point.
It's like saying - the story is not that good and choices don't matter too much for a telltale game. Yeah that's like the majority of dragon age...
I get what you're saying, but I'll take what they have given because of the complete shit show this game went through behind the scenes.
If this is successful as it seems to be, hopefully Bioware can make the next Mass Effect game the way they want to instead of having to remake the game twice because of EA's meddling.
Yeah but this game is a "return to form".
@@VampireKa1n apparently, it's not that "form" we all remember from DAO. But then again, how long ago was that? Dragon Age changed directions in 2011 with DA2, it was so obvious which route they are going with this franchise that the complaints about the new game not being like Origins are weird.
@@GreyMagee74 No a lot of this silly ideological nonsense comes directly from bioware itself, so the same team will still produce the same garbage writing for a mass effect.
Look how they massacred my boy... Quinari have been destroyed
I am interested to see what this new type of thinking will do with ME.
At this point I just look forward to my franchise’s burning. The money has to drop-down to a new Phoenix to get born at this rate.
Isabel had some massive budget cuts too
The qunari have sucked since dragon age 2
@@Mkrause762
Right. People need to get real.
"Quinari" Yeah, you and the guy commenting that they've sucked since DA2 have never played the franchise before.
I think I just need to accept that I'm not the target audience for this new dragon age. Seems more like it's aimed at the same audience as a young adult novel.
Not even. The only audience for this is game journalists, Reddit, Resetera and Twitter. The same audience as Dustborn, if that's not clear.
I accidentally made my character trans and then saved. I can’t undo it. I didn’t mean to convert my identity. But now my character that I designed to be masculine is now a trans woman. Am I able to undo this? Hopefully a mod? Ug
@@maddawgzzzz Just make a new character...
I need to clarify that I don't agree with any of the transphobic rhetoric that these games tend to attract online. I only meant that the writing is meant to be on grade level for people in 6th-8th grade.
@@maddawgzzzz You deserve this.
Am I a bit salty that THIS is what Dragon Age has now become? Yes. Yes I am.
same, game is pretty fun otherwise. the dialogue is a lot better than people say. Some characters suck others don't. Definitely glad I got it.
@@terrythegnome2408 i dunno terry, i watched a stream for 2 hrs yesterday and the dialogue was pret-ty bad. Glad you're enjoying it though. I'm not so salty that I don't want other people to have a good time!
@@terrythegnome2408 bioware dev spotted
@@terrythegnome2408 Yeah two characters are probably the only real culprits thats the veil leaper and the mage you start with.
Can u be doing something better yes yes you can
"Man I've just had a really rough day..."
"That fucking sucks. Wanna go get drunk and talk about it?"
THAT seems like it would fit very well here. People being real and also giving you a shoulder to lean on. Platitudes are platitudes for a reason, don't overuse them or they become cliche'd. We wanna connect with NPCs and enjoy talking with them.
Imagine making a Dragon Age game where the target demographic is specifically NOT the Dragon Age audience.
Its like Slipknot released a boy band album.
@@conorgillespie7832At least that would be hilarious
No idea why every entertainment company just has this as their credo. I don’t get it.
@@SlothmanTV There is alot of fully grown adults that go to Disney land without any kids.
I mean, it worked? Expanding your audience by dumbing down mechanics and generalising content sells better.
I think the "HR" talk is the big problem in many games today. It immediately makes you roll your eyes and keeps things boring. I hope the industry can go away from this to make games more interesting in the future. The rest of the game looks decent (outside some cringy scenes I've seen). I get a Hogwarts Legacy vibe with combat every video I see which isn't a bad thing.
Meanwhile, I'm playing BG3 and Red Dead Redemption 1 on PC now, and that dialogue and writing is just... hardcore. It holds no punches, dilutes nothing down for soft people. Doesn't push agendas down your throat and lecture you. Actually has a decent ark, with decent antagonists etc.
@@jonny-b4954 "agendas" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
@@FullMetalB What do you mean?
It's either that or dying slang. I almost just walked out of black panther when they dropped the what are those.
@@FullMetalB surely the "safe space" writing of the game was something totally planned and spontaneous right?
i don't think i've ever seen something so purple before. zero hyperbole; it's bizarre. like i sincerely wanna know how the hell they were able to make it look purple even when it.. doesn't seem to look purple? IT'S SO PURPLE!
I don't really get why people think 75-77k peak players for a AAA major franchise RPG from a major studio that's been in development for 7-10 years is impressive. It's likely going to peak at 100k over the weekend, which is almost half of what Dragon's Dogma achieved on Steam, and that's a more obscure mainly Playstation title. It's one third of Starfield, which was on game pass, and one eighth of BG3.
They can invent all kinds of PR lingo such as "Most successful Bioware Steam release!" but if it caps out at 100k over the weekend that's just a major disappointment and I can't imagine the studio or publisher will be happy with that.
Calling the long-awaited fourth installment of freaking Dragon Age a "junk food game" isn't the glowing recommendation you think it is. We need to expect more or studios will keep on churning out mediocre slop.
I want this to be a good game and succeed if only because the future of Mass Effect 5 hinges on it. What I've seen doesn't give me much hope at all.
The game is also on EA Play tbf so we won't have an accurate number for a while. The only comparison is likely Starfield which still had 300k players, I dunno if 1/3 of Starfields number will be seen as a success.
@@dr_diddy Correct, but I doubt EA Play is remotely as popular as Game Pass.
And didn’t black myth wukong peak over 1 million players?
Yup..... Look at BG3's yesterday's 24 hour peak....its 61000. This game is cooked if it gets similar concurrent players to a one year old game...
Wouldn't be bad numbers if it didn't take 7-10 years to make how many times has this game had to restart development from scratch or scrape ideas it's budget is probably way more than then starfield and bg3 combined
You basically said it was bad 3 different ways then said it was an okay game. Optimization isnt a plus games should at bare minimum run perfectly
"Doing pretty well?" Games of half the budget had 8x times that number on launch..wth
If the writing was just mediocre I could handle it, because the rest of the game is fairly serviceable, I’d say 6-7/10 ish. But the writing is aggressive in its lack of quality and preachiness and the lack of any real choice is antithetical to the BioWare I grew up with
I always played DA for the story and the writing. There is no point in playing and fighting trough levels if the "reward" is bad writing and just sucks.
Yeah the lack of genuine choice is shocking. I was watching a stream and was amazed at how little agency the player had over events in the game. Even small events.
I don’t want to be preached to EVER by a game or by weirdos who don’t even like themselves.
Yea, the lack of choice is what breaks it for me, the rest I can get used to. Bioware was known for AAA games with real choice and consequences until they watered it down starting from ME2.
I really like Luke Stephens's videos. She really gives a lot of insight...
...Aw shit... time to do 20 pushups...
Don't forget the obligatory sermon, otherwise you aren't truly sorry.
The cringiest scene in gamer history. Just… no words. Too much.
@@65firered You're right. I need the next 20 minutes talking about how I don't want to make this about me.
Pull a barf… sorry barv
hahahahahaha
how did we go from dragon age origins to this
This is how I feel when my favorite books, comics, musicals get made into movies... It's like they don't want to stick with a winning formula.
@@shawnnyp5686 i 100% agree. what amazon did to the wheel of time was disgusting
Because we aged and there's plenty of good games now. We're not 16 year old, easy to impress middle schoolers anymore.
@leidenschaftfaul tell me you have blue hair without telling me you have blue hair
Downhill
Luke..... if you're "having a good time", and it's "fine", why are you even considering not finishing the game? C'mon man, it sounds like you're trying reeeeeeally hard to be diplomatic.... when what you really think is : all in all mediocre.
He is a hater that monetizes popular hate for money and views....this is just another normal video for luke siht*ng on a game like he always does....even if it is in a "diplomatic " way!
kinda hyprocritical LOL
ya the problem with turning a UA-cam hobby into a full career, you feed your family with that money you sometimes cant afford to lose sponsors or connections. which in turn gives us inaccurate info (not that he is here). same with gaming journalism kind of, its a rough cycle. thats why id never rely on it 100%.
Not about this game, but the point itself is not that hypocritical. Sometimes the game is objectively good, but not to your taste, that's why you can have some time in-game, but not finish it.
@@Jpcraque you need your head checked by a professional
Some people say that we shouldn't hate on mid/slop games because they are not terrible and people can find fun in them, but if you work on a game for like 5-6 years and spend 200+mil on it then don't be satisfied with just slop "junk food" quality. This game could have been Baldur's Gate 3 level, and captured a new audience who never played Dragon Age or any RPG before, but its just meh like Andromeda was (at least its not broken and riddled with bugs like that game was), yeah there probably are new people trying it but there are also old fans of the franchise who will never even try it, based on the perceived quality of it and the way they handled this sequel.
The first thing that came to my mind with this game was : " Oh yeah, I remember Sacred 3, someone did it again..." , now I'm going to cry and reinstall DA:O
I've said it before and i'll say it again.
Every Character interaction in this game feels like its straight up from a Scooby Doo episode. Rooks natural response should be "Zoinks" or "Jinkies" for all the good the actual dialogue tree gives you.
Writing is that bad?
We talking like Saints Row, Justice League bad?
@@Ahmed24-tt9owI’m playing it and it not like that at all
The in game comments from the companions sound like someone talking to a 7yr old
@@Ahmed24-tt9ow Actually worse 😭😔 atleast the character in SR cusses, here none does, so that it doesn't to offend
Adding laugh tracks to this game surprisingly makes the writing/dialogue better.
Luke is misquoting Matt and Ralf. It wasn’t that they turned down the difficulty later because they got spongy later, they turned it down and wished they turned it down earlier saying all the enemies were spungy.
wasnt it because they thought the combat was boring and repetitive as shit rather than spongy enemies?
@ they said the combat felt like both, but the reason specifically they turned down the difficulty was because spongy enemies artificially made the combat longer. They said at no point was it hard.
Ralf said he didn't like the combat and just wanted to get through it as fast as possible. Not a good sign if you're trying to make combat "fun"
I tried it, but the story, dialogue, and retconning of the world at large just made me request my first ever refund. The voice acting was god awful and the tone a bit too chipper.
Fake review
I don’t know that I’d say the tone is chipper. Idk how far you got but the game still has a lot of that darkness to it. That hopelessness and that despair that innocent people are dying. But still has a little bit of that snarky sarcastic attitude that is very common in marvel movies. I like it so far. I think a lot of people are expecting origins again and that’s just never going to happen. If people look at it as a hope of old school BioWare revival then you’re going to be disappointed.
@@nathanfortun5768dawg, it literally is guardians of the galaxy tone and dialog it isn't dark at all
@@saintjames1995 I’m going to assume you haven’t played the game cause there is an entire town covered in blight and you can hear sounds of people getting suffocated and people being stabbed through their chests and hung. So yes there is a dark theme too it. The game doesn’t have to be constantly dark and depression to have a darker tone.
@nathanfortun5768 literally one dark area doesn't make the tone dark. And my wife got to that area and they were still making quips the whole fucking time
Every time I see Varic or Solas I’m like, “Oh yeah, this is Dragon Age.”
I keep thinking I’m playing the new Fable or Kingdoms of Amalur
In fairness Fable (1+2) and kingdoms of Amalur are good games... but yeah what is this Fortnite madame tussauds nonsense?
Yet another brave fence sitting "my wife liked this game'' take from Luke
Gotta keep the wife happy. Gotta try and keep that corporate access.
Wouldn't be surprised if the mild ass critique he gave when he went to the preview event blacklisted him from getting the review copy.
I mean, he has to review things fairly and review a game for the game. As a fan of previous dragon age titles, I'm not impressed by the game. But many people seem to like it.
If he just shit on the game for 20 minutes, with a biased view, that would defeat the point of such a video.
Yeah, Luke you should do a follow up review. I want to see your in depth thoughts on this. I just think it would be interesting.
I agree!
He wants to get the codes next time so he will never outright say its bad
@@malcolmdouglasmichaluk8263 He'll be waiting another 10 years probably. I think he has a chance to be brutally honest without hurting his income.
Not big on the fortnite-ification of the art style
I couldn't figure out what this looked like but fortnite pretty much nails it
It's crazy because the environments in this game can look really good. They got that, but missed bad with the characters
Yes. Dragon Age is supposed to be dark, rough, death everywhere. I'm really sad that I'm not gonna play this title and this probably ends my Dragon Age "fanatism".
One of my first observations
Don't buy this game for 60$. An ice cream cone is about 5 dollars, go buy 12 ice cream cones instead. Def a better experience
$5? What ice cream cone is $5?
@@KenLinx A good ice cream. Not like this bad game!
I love ice cream cones. This, not so much.
Hmmmmmmmmm
Icccccce Creeeeeeeeeaaamm
It's 70$
70k concurrent is not that great, either. Elden Ring, Cyberpunk, hell, the Monster Hunter Wilds Beta all released on a workday. Elden ring had almost a million concurrent players on release, Cyberpunk had one million, and the Wilds beta had 450k playing it yesterday. Cyberpunk is probably the most applicable. It was not an established IP when it came out, unlike Dragon Age, and it absolutely crushes Veilguard's numbers. To say it seems to be doing pretty well is not really evaluating the situation. If you do not want to pan it, fine, but do not say it's doing well when it clearly is not.
"Its not my game of the year.. so far.."
No shit, Sherlock
I cannot fathom out why some large gaming publications say that dragon age: veilguard is the best game bioware has ever made! What the hell??
Bceause its not about actual gameplay...its about ideology
@@FlxKomp To an extent yes, but also not wanting to burn bridges with BioWare/EA and lose early access to their games. Gotta play nice or no review codes or event invites for you.
Because all of the gaming publications are owned by 3-4 companies behind the scenes... at most.
@@jesseM138 If that was the case then they could have just said that it is "good 7/10". Saying "best something" is a stance, not appeasement.
I am doubtful that anyone who said that actually thinks that. Surely it's impossible to actually think that.
So much copium I keep seeing in every review. "It's fine. It's not Dragon Age nor an RPG, but it's fine. It doesn't crash and it works. It's fine. The graphics are nice, but the art sucks, but it's fine. The overall story is good, but all the dialog in an RPG game sucks. It's fine."
Because all of them bought by EA sooner or later. They are all soulless hipocrytes.
a balanced take isn’t “copium” what is wrong with you people? it’s like having a lukewarm/mild opinion isn’t okay anymore, why do you see the world so myopically?
@@cutenihilist He craps all over other games that are 6 to 7.5 level games. Makes me wonder why he's so forgiving of this one. Paid off or just afraid to offend the wrong industry people?
It's copium when you're lamenting how it isn't anything like the game you wanted and you keep saying, "it's fine, it's fine." It's not fine, it's not a balanced take. And who said anything about it not being okay to have a lukewarm opinion? Why do you see the world like a victim?
@cutenihilist that's an interesting take from someone with nihilist in their name.
This is like his third video not counting the livestreams talking about this game that is just "fine".Something is clearly not fine and it's not the same thing for Luke and the audience.
No one comes to a 20 minute review expecting no substantive opinions. He even uses innuendo to cover the controversies instead of just reporting the facts. He's clearly a shill trying to cope.
If Luke was the only guy I went to for game info, I wouldn't know half of what was going on around this game.
THAT drama is actually super immersion breaking, which is a critical factor in valuing an rpg.
cry more
You should value being successful more than a video game
Valid criticism 'cry more' behave@@Yuuki_Asuna
@@Yuuki_AsunaWeeb detected. Opinion invalid
How exactly is it immersion breaking? It's just a quest. Yall crying like the whole game is built on it.
I had it pre-ordered, but was waiting for reviews to make a final decision. After everything I saw from the day reviews went up to release, I ended up canceling it. If I ever do pick it up, it would be when it's heavily on sale. At the very least I was able to move the money I spent on pre-ordering to getting Metaphor ReFantazio , which I've heard good things about.
20:05 we know why they did it. Pretend you can't put 2 and 2 together if you want, be we all know why they did it. Play ball with them if you want to keep your access, but you're not fooling anyone.
Thank you.
Another shill to add to the list.
The modern day conversation does bother me, not in a way that other people are bothered by, but it just breaks immersion, I mean nobody talks like that in ancient times! Unless you are Marty McFly
That was abandoned in Inquisition but this is SIGNIFICANTLY worse.
yes, i remember the use of the word "stuff" common... really... it's true it breaks immersion constantly earing modern words that don't belong in a medieval fantasy universe
I mean, nobody really talks like that right now.
Yeah but that's why people are mad, even if they don't realize it. Nobody would care if the game was good. I watched "Hackers" the other day and like half the characters in that were some form of LGBTQ but nobody complained because it contributed to the story, it didn't bring the plot to a screeching halt. Make a good game with a good story, then add whatever ESG stuff you want. Some will still complain, sure, but you will make all the money.
Modern day conversation?
DA veilguard is not bad only because it's kind of so-so, it's bad because it comes as a final nail in the coffin of what the dragon age franchise could have been, and what everyone was expecting since origins. inquisition was not bad either, it was just disappointing as it was supposed to come as a healing for the franchise after DA2 which weirdly start to get some recognition as more and more other episodes release.
No dragon age game is "bad". They just increase or decrease in value as people get disappointed by new opus, which today put Origin as a legendary status
Have you tried playing Inquisition lately it's really bad
Since origins? That game came out in 2009. Imagine waiting for something like that, which you clearly werent going to get, for almost 15 years.
@@Mkrause762I loved inquisition so can't wait to buy the best package for veilguard
Dragon age was always trash.
@@Mkrause762 I liked it at the time. In hindsight (I'm talking since ME Andromeda), it had some telltale signs of where BioWare was going in the near future. Kind of taints my perception of the game.
Totally got to disagree with you on the art style. Show me one person that has played a previous Dragon Age game and likes the look of the new Qunari. Every single one looks awful and like megamind with horns
I like the art style and I’ve played them all. Am I looking forward to mass effects return to realism sure. You can like both. It’s possible.
Yea both the character style choices and the overall graphics presentation. The characters are not only rough on the eyes but look like they're made out of plastic or hard rubber. Very Pixar/Fortnite. The environments look pretty good for the most part though I'll give them credit there.
But literally no one plays qunari anyway 😂
🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫
I actually like the new style more, but obviously it's a personal taste thing - I only played the OG dragon age for a handful of hours back on 360 on a CRT and it looked like mud so it's not like im a hardcore fan or anything.
12 minutes in and you're still being too lenient on the game. A whole lot of word salad with pretty much no meaning here. If we go by that, then either you like the game and don't want criticism for it, your friends/family like the game and don't wanna piss them off or you'd rather pander to corporations for early access to games.
No, I don't expect you to just rip the game a new asshole, I just expected you to get to the damn point instead of beating around the bush. It seems everyone who's talking about the game is either like you or just flat out shitting on it because "PrOnOuNs" and surgery scars are an option in it... don't know why I bother watching independent discussions or reviews on games anymore when you all are getting to the low levels of journalists that are affiliated with the likes of IGN and whatnot.
It's a mix of therapy careful speak and corpo HR speak. It's excruciatingly AWFUL dialogue.
I almost feel bad for the writers because they're going to be getting shit on for years to come because of it. But yeah, they do not understand how to write human beings.
@@universe1225 Then, they need to learn how to write (and in the meantime suffer us), bc they should not have a writer's job if they cannot do the job. This is really incompetent work, sadly.
@@marconeves1979 I doubt it was actually the writers fault. As with the dialogue ingame, I bet "HR was in the room" most of the time and approved (or not) every line to be perfectly safe. Having to be a writer for such corporations must be a living hell.
Dragon age was always woke. And that was okay because the writing around those aspects weren’t insufferable. In fact they were done quite well. They handled gay and trans characters in a great way.
I’m a far left liberal but good god man I HATE this. Everything is shoved down your throat and I can hear the writers just thinking “me me me” with every word that comes out of the characters mouths
This is what people who scream “woke” are talking about. It’s cringy. It’s out of place. It’s hypocritical and, it’s so fucking annoying.
I’ve watched enough of the dialogue to know it is painfully cringeworthy. I can’t get through a RPG when I’m rolling my eyes every time they talk. This looks and sounds like a game made for teenage girls.
Lol it didn't even crack 100K players for a major release by a AAA studio
that numbers awful
It could have with console players as well
I thought that 70k was only steam users? Would like to know total sales vs just peak players because there may be people who’ve bought it and haven’t started yet
@@jordynlewis3865 thats each if it cant on steam the worlds biggest gaming platform FAIL the cope is real with this game
@@TheForbidden_1ne Steam is the biggest gaming platform by far
@@jordynlewis3865 My friend, most steam games like Black Myth Wukong which had over a million and even Starfield which had 300,000 players on launch which is what everyone talks about. Those numbers are even higher if we're counting sales outside of steam.
Lost me at 70k is a very good "mid week" number, my guy more people were playing mhw beta if you get outplayed by a beta it's not been a successful launch
Edit: well the weekend is here and the numbers are still shit lol
I unsubscribed, scared fence sitting reviewers are worthless.
BG3 peaked at 100k yesterday, veilguard couldnt get over 90k. a singleplayer game released well over a year ago having more concurrant players than a major AAA release on first weekend is terrible. especially concidering the budget.
The writers definitely went to therapy and based their writing around it lol
I just hate that my alleged dark fantasy series is now a pixar fantasy set in california
Pixar fantasy, that has sex and blood and demons
Dragon Age didn't really regress, I think. It's just that those of us who played Origins, Two and Inquisition when it came out matured. Like, Origins has a great world building but dialogue writing wasn't as good as we're all making it out to be now and very cringy at times.
I was a middle-schooler during Origins. Inquisition came out a decade ago. It's just that the games didn't age with us.
If their goal was to shrink the Dragon Age playerbase by more than half, then this game is a huge success, lol.
they just don't feel like writing mass effect 5, they are trying their hardest so it doesn't happen 😂
It's all about perspective mate lol
But there are currently more players on steam than inquisitions all time peak. So it would seem they didn’t shrink the player base by more than half. Cause it’s already bigger. Not even a dragon age fan but you guys just say anything.
@gabrielolsen2648 since gaming has expanded increasingly over the last 10 years it would say its still not that much
@gabrielolsen2648 Inquisition wasn't available on Steam until well after its initial release. I guarantee this game isn't going to even hit half the sales of Inquisition.
Inquisition's implementation of open world maps made most of the game feel like a chore. At least the map design has been significantly improved. The bits and pieces I've heard of the soundtrack make it seem as though the game has significantly improved in that department as well. Inquisition had some bangers but during most of the game all you hear is ambient music even if you're in combat. There seems to be some really solid combat music in this one. It's too bad the writing and gameplay mechanics seem to have either gone further in the wrong direction or remained the more or less the same.
I'm 31, I've played every bioware rpg since kotor. I'm about 20 hours into the veilguard and I just feel like some of the criticism has been a little bit hyperbolic. The writing to me has been quite engaging, the characters are fun and interesting (we will see where they go). I have not met the super controversial one yet. But everything else about the game has been absolutely superb. No bioware rpg has been some deep role playing experience outside of origins and even that game isn't bg3 levels of role playing. Not sure what people expected here. Feel like I'm playing a different game then some of these other folks lol. Different strokes for different folks I suppose. Gunna play metaphor after this.
Ps. Love you Luke! Your the best!
So this is how one of my favourite gaming franchise dies😢
It died with inquisition. People supporting the red flags all over that game resulted in a bioware that truly believed they were headed in the right direction, that's how we got Andromeda and now this abandoned corpse called veilguard.
Bioware died 3 games ago, they lost everyone good at the company years ago
@oldmanjesus9855 truer words were never spoken, friend
The franchise that had one good game?
@@randomguy6679 dragon age 2 was a good game. It suffered from a very limited set of scenarios and the combat was not as tactical as origins(which some people actually welcomed) but other than that the plot, pacing, structure, lore, characters designs, companions, quests and side quests were all great.
DA2 is definitely not a bad game, it has way more positives than negatives.
Oh and the initial lack of a dedicated archer character was idiotic.
69k peak players for a game with that budget with heavily mixed reviews is not going to be great for the tail of this games sales.
It could take a very long time to even approach breaking even on the balance sheet.
I'm torn as reviews are decent but all the clips I have seen are dull mcu style humour or strange social commentary. Please tell me most of the game is 'serious' in tone?
It's not. Many reviewers mentioned that DAVG doesn't really have deep, serious or dark moments with few shallow exceptions, but these exceptions are just cliches, like "It's really quiet here... Too quiet".
Don't trust the reviews from the gaming journalists. Watch YT videos of gameplay instead and decide by yourself. I saw enough clips to be sure that I will never touch this game
If u still rely on reviews from "game journalists", u are the target audience for this game. Never ever trust an official game review from the likes of IGN or Eurogamer or whatever and always look for content creators reviews on youtube.
Played about 3h yesterday (mostly of that in the character creator, so about an hour and a half of actual gameplay) and let's just say that the dialogue is very... em... got me eye rolling multiple times. It mostly feels like people who wrote the game didn't play previous games but skimmed wiki page about them and rolled with it (elven role got retconned so badly I wanted to cry). Also yeah. They are trying to be funny. But. Em. It's not really working. So like what's happening might be serious but the characters have like... Zero braincells. I feel like a teenage me that had been there for every MCU premiere might have been more forgiving but 25yo me, who writes as a hobby is like... They seriously got paid for this? So far, the closest this game falls for me, is literally Hogwarts Legacy (which was fine, I had fun, didn't have much expectations, and really liked like one plotline) where I didn't pay much attention to dialogue, but was there to enjoy the views. That and like fanfiction, but the ones I open and close 5 pages in, because it just... so meh.
ironically this first impressions of yours is as bland and safe as the dialogue
Yep, lost any respect of "their" opinion, it's sugar coated at best.
Last vid I ever watch.
@@KarlWinner-lc2wc😘😘😘😘😘
You could say he's... Lukewarm 😅
11:50 I strongly disagree with this take. From a gameplay perspective it soft locks you with the same party the longer you play, because you don't want to "loose" levels by switching up partymembers. From a storytelling perspective, it tells the players that people outside his party are not doing anything noteworthy without him around to see it, which (at least in my eyes) is bad storytelling.
To put the some 70,000 people playing Veilguard into perspective: that's about the same number that Baldur's Game 3 has at the same time. A game that came out over a year ago, is supposed to have the same target audience and peaked well over 800,000.
Monster Hunter Wilds has more players... That game isn't out yet.
baldurs gate 3 had a looooong early access period. People already knew the game would be absolutely amazing well ahead of time. Comparing this to BG3 is disingenous. Also, The internet has aleady decided to hate this game well before release because its EA and bioware. It never had a shot. And that's too bad. it's actually a really solid game.
Ok Grummz
@@frankhemstra634Reasoning with Grummz fans won't work
@@frankhemstra634 If you believe anyone out there would hate a game simply because it is from BioWare, you have to be extremely new to video gaming (definitely post-2014). In this case, I might get an understanding of why you would consider something like Veilguard a "really solid game".
There's a lot of things I have that I can complain about with this game. A lot. But one thing is chief amongst them.
Why the hell are art directors so afraid of making dwarves look like goddamn dwarves? What's wrong with massive bedazzled beards? Who gives a shit about some minor clipping, I want to feel like a DWARF. I'm getting tired of only having Vermintide 2 to fulfill my dwarf-beard-to-the-ground experience. Get a grip and make a fucking dwarf!
Deep Rock Galactic is recruiting Miners.
Hopefully, you can mine better than you can dance.
😂😂😂
Rock & Stone!
Rock and Stone brother !
I just can't be doing with the poor writing, it's insulting and condescending, I expect better from a studio with a pedigree like Bioware.
The Bioware you remember no longer exists
Early access content creators will always act as if HR is in the room with them
Look at the game director and lead writer. Explains everything
I've just been watching someone play this and omg, straight line, follow the leader who never stops talking absolute drivel. Did an AI write the dialogue? Quest markers are literally pointed out like you're a five year old and have to be hand held all the way.
The quest markers is a setting so.. if you are going to talk shit about something please know what you are talking about. Love or hate the game idc but Jesus Christ it’s ridiculous how people can talk shit but be so unaware of what they are talking about.
it should bother in every way its pretentious and agenda pushing cause its a echo chamber company that hires based on if they tow the line, leading to no push back on any idea
leading to dialogue where everything is super kind and no push back language except when it suits them
What happened to writers? Where are you? Why are they so captured with just bad dialogue and stupid world views and shoving them into storylines? Who is hired and who are they writing for? I just don’t get it
Look up a game called Dustborn real quick. There you'll find your answers.
it's all these gen z purple haired septum piercings they're hiring.
If you see the lead writer, you will understand everything.
An issue in a lot of entertainment nowadays is writers writing for themselves, things they wanna see/play, not as a product to be sold. Then they'll say "it's not for you" whilst simultaneously blaming you for not buying it.
DEI
Seems like the way they talk to each other very similar to the way corporate people talk in real life, lol
The idea of "not looking for an intense RPG" in DRAGON AGE from BIOWARE is appalling to me
Appalling? Relax bud lol its a game
@@RumblesBettr Relax bud, it's just a comment, lol.
@@ImmortalComposer yea so was mine bud
@@RumblesBettr Well so we have an interesting conundrum on our hands. Since you agree it's JUST a comment, why you telling the op to relax? It was just a comment. The op must be relaxed then.
@ lol relax man
14:29 i would like to hire Luke to be an extra in all my works going forward
refunded, spent the money on yarn
Hey, that's useful if you ever get trapped in a labyrinth!
way more productive
I think what makes me cynically chuckle about the trans questline is the fact that even black identity issues can't get a questline this authentic in a AAA game. Even Rockstar refused to do it with RDR2. It really illuminates where the priorities lie in the industry.
This cringey, YA and fanfic-influenced sludge writing has been forced into the ears of players (and viewers, when including TV and movies) for YEARS. WE DO NOT WANT IT ANYMORE. I know writers like to exclusively endear themselves to people that are like them, but do companies realize that general audiences are sick of this current trend?!
Speak for yourself? Why do you have to assume to speak for everyone? Dangerous trait, you should watch that.
@@CurtOntheRadioi agree with him
@@sol9059 fine. but do you imagine everyone agrees?
@@CurtOntheRadio did u also commenting like this on Concord video/forum?
Genuine question from me.
@@shocktriple no. i wouldn't be able to spot concord screenshots or say what it was about. no idea.
This man is talking about the game in hr speak my god the game is BAD if you can’t role play in an RPG which is the whole POINT of the game and series especially if the writing is so ass and so not in the world this was one of my favorite game series cause of the world and characters and story and they completely ripped it all away and disrespected us and the series as a WHOLE this really upset me this was one of my childhood games I beat all three games on each console it’s one of the reasons I LOVE RPGs so much and got me into the genre and seeing it like this broke my heart and spirit and after hearing about what’s going on in the studio I’m not surprised and definitely have no hope for mass effect which sucks even more
Writers and directors of this game are not even good enough to work in a school play, let alone a multi million project.
Objectively i agree it looks fine ish. Subjectively i hate the character design, the tone shift, and the pivot away from dragon age's rpg roots. definitely not a game i care to play through personally, but would definitely still be interested to see a full review.
I bet baldurs gate 3 has more players by the end of the month lol.
Baldur's Gate 3 as of right now has 73,000.
For a game like Dragon Age we shoud not be re-treading the same areas over and over again in new missions
Which was a big issue in Dragon Age 2 ffs.
@@randomguy6679 its been 13 years since that game came out, and its still a divisive entry
@@politkos5348 No, I meant that despite the fact that it was a common complaint in 2, they didn’t bother to fix that in Veilguard.
this is why i really like Luke's videos; he is honest and reviews games objectively. GREAT VIDEO, thanks
My biggest issue, as someone who played and enjoyed all 3 games and their DLC's, is that only three of my choices are going to count in the game. I get it is sort of a soft reboot that also wraps up the storyline but instead of Mass Effect 3 level of your past choices coming back and being acknowledged it's a game that really is not going to recognize my world state. It makes it feel like the last 3 games were for nothing and I don't really hear people complain about it.
Baldur's Gate 3 feels like it was written by people who love their craft and have spent years working on it. Dragon Age feels like it was written by people who don't love their craft as much as they have things to say. They should stick to the forums and leave writing to actual writers.
This should have been a tumblr fan fiction. Not an actual game.
I will say from the looks of it they certainly populated areas with enough random NPC's and such. Hate when games have a city or town with like... ~50 people in it.
I realize he’s got to pay his bills, but Video starts at 3:00 🙄
🙏
The main point in the video is at 18:40, basically you aren't sure if you are even going to finish this mess... tnx
For me the characters talking feels like they were lowkey high all the time
Nope, I don't waste my time with this game.👎
But wasted time watching videos about it I’m sure this isn’t the first video you’ve watched on it 😂
@Saulgoodman94 no bro only watched skillup video and Lukes video i wanted to make sure if its a game worth my 70 dollars hard earned money and now I know it is not worth it but good for you if you liked it have fun ✌️
True better waste your time watching videos on the game you hate, and commenting on them. Talk about having a game living rent free in your head
Better to waste time here than waste money and accidentally encouraging more video game sermons being published.
@@Dooger414 as if your single purchase has any affect on the games performance or even your comment can dissuade people who were gonna originally buy the game. If you don’t like something just stfu and move on. Simple as that. Do you go to every single movie theater and whine at the entrance about how you didn’t like a certain movie?
It 70k is pretty good for you, what about Wukong o W40K? For an IP like DA, 70k is at least weak.
for comparison
Black Myth: Wukong had 2,415,714 concurrent players on launch. Cyberpunk had 1,054,388 concurrent players on launch. Elden Ring had 952,523 concurrent on launch. Hogwart's Legacy had 879,308. Baldur's Gate 3 had 875,343 on full release. Starfield had 330,723.
@@alizaidi2893 Thanks for giving us them numbers, chum.
Yeah 70k is super super weak for a AAA game with a massive budget, by a major well known developer, and an established well known franchise with a fairly sizable fanbase. 70k is atrocious. I’ll be surprised if it breaks 125k on steam at any point in the whole launch weekend
Wow, they broke you Luke, I´ve never seen you being this boring and safe in your words with any other review of a bad game.
Also, yes, please do a full review. I'm interested to hear how much your opinion changes (if at all) after playing more of the game.
I disagree with it selling well. If you compare it to triple A mega titles like Witcher 3, Baldur's Gate 3, Cyberpunk, Elden Ring, Ghost of Tsushimitata... even Double As like Helldivers 2 and Space Marines 2... it sold comparatively worse. While having a larger budget. WHILE the prior Dragon Age titles out sold all the prior titles of the games I just brought up. It's not good, man.
having only the companions you bring with you gain EXP is a terrible idea. what fucking year is it, that's PS2 game design. What if you start with a character realise you hate them so you want to change but now the level difference makes you feel like you cant. In BG3 I used lae'zel for awhile because I felt like I needed a fighter. The second I found karlach I decapitated Lae'zel.
I agree with the sentiment but how dare you treat Bae'zel that way.
KOTOR 1&2 had EXP given to companions you didn't take with you. "BioWare" as we knew it, is dead.
Interestingly enough, abusive people who know "therapy language" and use it well are some of the most dangerous...
Easy skip for me. Artstyle, Character models, and most importantly dialogue and role playing elements are very important to me when it comes to an rpg. I dont play Bioware games for their gameplay. I play for the companions, story, and immersing myself in the world. And it seems that is the weakest part of Veilguard.
There's a reason lots of reviewers didn't get review codes, don't be naive. They knew how divisive the lackluster writing and modernity would be and they tried to hide it to protect their pre-orders. It's really not that hard to understand.
My main issue with how the game performs overall is both from narrative standpoint and a gameplay standpoint. Think of the previous game dragon age acquisition the very beginning of the game main menu has emphatic, ambience, music powerful accord, a symbol, a new journey, a new strange time you see marches of crowds of soldiers walking to the chantry. The voice acting in the game is some of the best for dragon age. Overall, each of the characters put emphasis on what they’re saying, the strength of the urgency of the direness of the situation when Cassandra tells you that there’s a giant fucking hole in the sky and that all hell is breaking loose people are losing faith and you’re the only one you have the inquisitor not at point mentioned, but you’re the only one who can solve it. Then you have Liliana the spymaster trying to logic reason you are met with a wonderful cast at the start each independent each strong of their own right and it doesn’t matter about the wellness of an agenda or what not I could care less about any of that. Hell you could bang anyone and have relations with same-sex characters and otherwise but they were well written well loved well received. Sure Veilguard looks good. It’s the best series has ever looked graphically and atmospherically that can’t be denied but all that fall flat if there’s no good writing behind it, all the characters seem more one-dimensional one painstakingly brushstroke after another. You had much much more exploration in dragon agent acquisition the whole of the southern status was yours to explore. You could keep going to places checking out different little bits of location trying out new characters to see what new reactions you could do a lot of things. Every small decision you made even getting the logging camp for the starting area basically changed the ability for you to do certain things later on in the game if you hadn’t done it, you wouldn’t have gotten certain upgrade that you needed it. I’m sure it’s nice to see some fan favorite characters return however there is a massive disregard to everyone that was part of the biggest force assembled for a single villain. I will give the new game kudos to improving the ability and passive system as opposed to dragon age inquisition, and making the combat more streamlined and more fun. Veilguard going the route of a linear story with linear areas to explore really diminishes the overall field of what dragon age had. I mean, we as a community halfway to 10+ years since the trespasser DLC to finally get a resolution to the dread wolf the new game takes all of our choices from the past other three titles and throws them into obscurity saying fuck it. Eight years happened since the last big event times have changed whatever move on and that is it there could’ve been a better implementation of the new team in new characters new styling new ways to make them feel more alive, but everyone is so one dimensionally focused. And don’t even get me started on the fact that the new game basically takes the Mass Effect two loyalty system and puts it into basically the magic version gameplay of Mass Effect and Andromeda all that for the final resolution to dragon age is a hole. I’m 26 right now, if you had told me when I was 16, 10 years ago when inquisition launched that this is what I would have to be looking forward to I wouldn’t want it in the first place I would’ve never even asked for it simply because it’s just not worth it at all. There’s no substance. It’s more so a jelly filled donut that’s filled withonly half the jelly sure there’s some things you like here in there but realistically it’s an empty game it’s a shell of whatever it should’ve been. The most I’m willing to realistically give the new game is a 5.5 out of 10. and the rest of the story of kills off for me in the end.
Luke... Just one request... Do a straight comparison of Baldur's Gate 3 and this game in every aspect. Even wanted to associate their game with something similar to BG3. Please do one and all things will be clear...
Lmao im still waiting for someone to make that
Itll be absolute massacre thats so hit bcs itll be used everytime to dunk on the shill of the game 😂
@namelessone9941 so true!
If it wasn’t called “Dragon Age” it would flop.
Because it’s called “Dragon Age” BioWare has filled the grave they dug with past games.
It's a prop, that's not working.
nobody I know knows what Dragon Age is, it's not a massive IP at all, so no
@@Yuuki_Asunawdym its not massive IP at all lmao, are you hanging out with minors that haven't even exists yet when the first three released?
@@Yuuki_Asuna not sure about that lol but this game is going to make it “not a massive IP”. They keep burning bridges game after game. Ubisoft and BioWare need an overhaul of personnel or they will go by the wayside.
@@Yuuki_AsunaThat's like saying TES isn't a massive IP
(8:28) With respect dude, they're not "more linear levels", they ARE linear levels.. There is NOTHING open world or even semi-open world about these levels.. quit blurring the truth. This game is SO obscenely far from what anyone would expect from a dragon age game in almost every single way, that we may as well not call it one.
exatcly what he says every bit of dialogue ive seen is voiced with the same amount of energy. theres no anger, no shock, no surprise, no sadness.
7:30 I started the game where enemies have less health but deal more damage and that balance worked great for me. Made it a interactive with combat and kept it short
Having RPG elements and dialogues like HZD is an offense to a BioWare game. End of story.
20 minute video just for this dude to sidestep any real thoughts or critique is just a waste of my time. I won't watch anymore of Lukes videos since he seem to be more about being neutral than having a damn opinion about something.
It has the lowest peak playercount out of every AAA RPG on Steam
Please do a full review would be interested to get your full opinion when you finish the game