Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Napoleon - All Clips From The Movie (2023) Joaquin Phoenix
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 сер 2024
- Watch our clip compilation for Napoleon! In theaters now.
A personal look at the French military leader’s origins and swift, ruthless climb to emperor, viewed through the prism of Napoleon’s addictive, volatile relationship with his wife and one true love, Josephine.
Watch NAPOLEON for free with a trial subscription ➤ AppleTV.yt/Nap...
Apple TV+ is a streaming service with content exclusively produced by Apple, the Apple Originals. Watch Apple TV+ in the Apple TV app on all your Apple devices or streaming platforms and smart TVs.
© Sony Pictures
The problem with a lot of these battle scenes is there's no weight, no context. Austerlitz, Borodino, Waterloo, we never see the politics behind each battle and why each battle is so important. It undermines the effectiveness of the battle scenes imo, yes they're epic but ultimately they have no emotion or tension.
STUFF THE POLITICS......... GIVE ME THE ACTION.
@@deangreenhall3762 For people like you, there are shooting games for android...
You are a deep thinker and like history. However, as a movie, there are many reasons why it is difficult to describe the purpose and cause of these battles.
It's more of a recap on his big moments probably assuming you know enough about him going into it but I hope there is a long directors cut ...there's a rumor there is a long cut 4 hrs of footage
Its not difficult they just need to give screwn time to lost and lost of more characters, like watching actual history unfold nost just one guy's story.
There is too many wonderful and superbly done documentaries on UA-cam, or books to waste time on Hollyweird's interpretation of Napoleon Bonaparte.
I'm an amateur historian yet not a purist. This movie carries a great deal of the dramatic spirit of the age. Napoleon is too complex and titanic a character for any one movie to do him full justice.
They made napoleon look sad and week, the guy was a straight if conqueror.
I saw the film last week. It was undermined by the emphasis on his relationship with Josephine. Instead, it should have concentrated on the political power struggles and intrigue with the royalists. The action sequences themselves seemed curtailed in parts - the Egyptian bit for example, heralded in the trailer but of little impact - instead, him worrying about the absence of letters from Josephine! His American accent was also annoying. The persistent use of "the English" then sometimes, "the British". The war was with Britain, not England.
TRUTH
The Director was British though
Thus, he should have known better!@@bigbake132
yes, u right.....i dont think its a good movie....the actor is weak, nothing characteristic
You had to be a real piece of work to fight a war in a captain crunch outfit.
Well back in the day soldiers dressed the part…you could differentiate them from civilians. Unlike in modern times, where Islamists hide behind women and children.
Next step: Exile Ridley Scott to the island of St. Helena for character assassination on a great historical figure, and just plain terrible moviemaking.
Ridley Scott is a has been. This was a missed opportunity and would have been better served as an HBO series.
This is a Netflix TV mini series with one hour cut out to make a movie out of it .
Hopefully the TV series with the missing one hour added back in will improve things .
Phoenix seems to play the character like he's on handfuls of Xanax.
Ridley Scott's Napoleon (2023) was historically inaccurate in the extreme. I understand movies aren't always supposed to be historically accurate, that'd almost be impossible, and I understand that there's dramatic license for the sake of storytelling, but at least a movie should get the big picture more or less right. Napoleon (2023) falls far short of that. Lots of what's depicted in this movie is speculation at best and lots of important events in Napoleon's life were simply left out. And that's besides Joaquin Phoenix's depiction of Napoleon, which makes removes all the graces - especially his charisma - that the real Napoleon had, as a military commander beloved by his troops and as a populist leader beloved by the people of France for most of his life where Napelon was akin to someone like Julius Caesar in terms of popularity among the people (though of course the monarchists and other traditionalists in France and outside of France hated Napoleon and in the end defeated him). Indeed, the entire movie makes it seem like Napoleon was an incel or simp who obsessed over Josephine and who as military commander won as often as he lost, even though in reality Napoleon it was something like 46 out of 60 battles won throughout his life, tied 7 battles, and lost 7 battles. And as Wellington said about Waterloo - it was a close run thing and could've gone either way. Anyway, it's a shame that the movie is so historically inaccurate. The reality of Napoleon is actually far more interesting than Scott's fiction. That said, I've heard there's a 4+ hour director's cut of Napoleon that will be released in the future. I hope this director's cut fixes most of the blatant historical inaccuracies in the movie. I hope it's like the director's cut of Kingdom of Heaven which was far better than the theatrical version of Kingdom of Heaven.
Thanks, I would like to see the director's cut of Kingdom of Heaven. I'll look for it. I think, to do Napolean, would require a 4 part 8 or nin hour epic film. People today aren't interested in details, or the back story.
Waterloo, 1970 is on UA-cam, it's very good.
Agreed. Napoleons life WAS a movie in and of itself. They really missed out on educating people about the political scene at the time. All the kings and royalty against one man. They literally declared war on Napoleon, not France after he came back from Elba.
Next your going to tell me Inglorious Bastards was inaccurate lol.
No kidding,…
@@rockhardrockhounds9970 "Next your going to tell me Inglorious Bastards was inaccurate lol. No kidding,… "
I mean, Inglorious Basterds never marketed itself as a historically accurate movie, whereas Napoleon did market itself that way.
We just hat down to waterloo 1970 is the best napoleon movie 🎉
映画館にて視聴いたしました。
面白かったけど、やはり3時間ではナポレオンを語るのには短すぎたのかなあと思います。
約５０年前の名作「ワーテルロー」では、最終決戦のワーテルロー会戦のシーンだけで２時間近く
費やしてましたし。
せめて、2部作に分けてくれたら・・・
I wish i had saved my money and three hours of my life by watching this 6 minute clip for free. What a potentially epic film, alas it was a 3 hour mushfest. I couldnt care less about his relationship with Josephine.....
A Roman Emperor ❤
The pain of my ears but I'm safe now for now...
The canons!!!!
Rather watch Waterloo
This is a Netflix TV mini series with one hour cut out to make a movie out of it .
Hopefully the TV series with the missing one hour added back in will improve things .
The only part I like is the end when the sound goes “BWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO” right before the title is shown. :)>
This movie was badass. Idc what anyone says
Same
If we compare Napoleon with Hitler and the French with the Germans the distance is from Mount Everest to the bottom of the sea.
I felt I would have liked to see more history and less sex
Same
in. 1798 Napoleon was 29 years old, he didn't look at all like this old actor. It is a huge mistake.
Wait for the Ridley Scott 4 hr directors cut on 4k
Imagine what Napoleon could have achieved had he not gotten tangled up with Josephine.
As moovie was nice to spend your time.. But the battle of austerlitz... Such a joke...... 😂 i laught a lot
vive napoléon vive la france
Absolutely crap Hollywood movie that ignores history. Best wait to watch it on some streaming service you have.
Give. Me. A. Break. On top of all the inane battle sequences and historical nonsense maybe next time pick an actor who isn't twice the figure's age. Rod Steiger was far, far superior. Sad.
Excellent movie and superbly both directed and acted !
I know Phoenix isn’t a French actor but I feel like that could’ve at least got a French actor to play Napoleon-the dialogue isn’t even authentic French…not that I’m complaining, but WTF???
They’re called subtitles for a reason…🇫🇷
I have been studying Bonaparte for more than 30 years and read hundreds of books. This is one of the most inaccurate and unreal film. It is a Hollywood movie, where it only focus his relationship with the Josefine. It was bad done. It is impossible to describe his history in 2 hrs... The young generation does NOT deserve this bad quality movie.
This is a Netflix TV mini series with one hour cut out to make a movie out of it .
Hopefully the TV series with the missing one hour added back in will improve things .
The Napoleon 2002 movie is closer to the reality show ! : O))
napoleon - father of Great Britain, German Empire, Austrian Empire and Russian Empire 🥸🥸
This was the most boring waste of 2 hours I could ever imagine.
Burning Moscow scene is great.
Well, "Napoleon" is to the real history as "The Godfather" trilogy is to the real mafia.
This is the trash that I knew it would be. Watch Waterloo which was filmed in 1970 starring Rod Steiger who gives an excellent portrayal of Napoleon. No CGI either. Fantastic movie.
такое впечатление, что опять бедных французов жестоко убивали, а то что их никто не звал - это другое
Surely all clips from the movie means the whole movie?
I just watched this movie yesterday and it was amazing well its good their's a video on it because it's the best movie this year!!!
It's utter rubbish; it concentrates far too much on his love life and skims over 30 years of history, the battle scenes, while being historically laughable, are on a tiny scale, and JP is far too old and tired to play the part of Napoleon. As a comparison I rewatched Waterloo, now that is how you make a film about Napoleon.
@@knightsnight5929you're dumb and your analytical skills are embarrassing. The Battles which you call "tiny" had thousands of extras in them, all practical effects, real costumes and weapons, and your comment is already trash by this point. "Waterloo" only depicts 1 battle in the entire movie, Napoleon depicts 5 battles in 2hr30min. Pseudo-tiktok-historians of my balls 😂 laughable to say the least.
@@knightsnight5929Waterloo (1970) will always remain to be the best napoleonic movie
@@_1_05_ I'll second that, although Bondarchuck's 'Voyna i Mir' runs it a close second.
Not as good as the five part TV Movie from 2002!
Check out the Able Gance film from the 1920s. Or Sergei Bondarchuk’s 1970 epic Waterloo.
All the hype in the world. But this dud never got off the runway. The script and the cast were both totally unconvincing. What a waste , it could have been a contender , Charlie.
An epic film.
...the army cannot march with the empty stomach...Another genious?
BEST MOVIE OF THE YEAR hands down. I've also watched Oppenheimer and Killers of the Flower Moon, which are also masterpieces, but they really felt SMALL in comparison with this Napoleon. Not here to discuss about history, this is pure CINEMA! No BS.
Bruh, pheonix made him feel like childish depressed old man, nowhere near the supposed charismatic leader than men laid their lives for.
It also felt way too rushed and focused way to much on his sex life.
@@loyalpiper Partly true, thats why im waiting for the 4hr directors cut, it is not accurate but it was a joy for the eyes nonetheless and i enjoyed Joaquin alot.
Napoleon Is a masterpiece
@@sabbia81 person is, film ain't
WRONG!
Nice film, good quality expensive made. But I'm disappointed in the battles! Historically inaccurate! Especially the battle of Austerlitz! I also miss the battles of Borodino and Ulm! Perhaps also paying more attention to battles of the Nile and Gibraltar instead of all those unnecessary sex scenes! 🤮🤢 Half the film to much focus on sex between Napoleon and Josephine!!! 😓😓😓
This movie had spectacle, but no soul. The visuals and production value were great, but the plot, the writing, all of it fell short. It felt like a disjointed movie.
masterful
wasnt this guy a roman emperor
1:55
Does anyone think *rump has the same complex?
TDS.
This movie sucked, people like Ridley Scott need therapy not praise
Joaquin phoenix was not the right person to play Napoleon. Bad casting decision plain and simple.
He’s a good actor, but he surely didn’t fit the role of napoleon
Only saw 20 sec and i totally agree!!!
Ok other nobody.
@@CenizasdePecador donde esta el baño?
@@TheRealForgetfulElephanten el biblioteca
Gladiator was incredible But Ridley should not have made a film off this awful script ! Josephine sections should have all been cut. True disappointment
Le film est vraiment passable, je m'attendais à beaucoup mieux de RS, c'est le plus mauvais film que j'ai pu voir sur Napoléon !
Why don’t use any French accent in the movie it sounds so American lol
looks like he miscast Napoleon. With thousands of options too. Not terribly smart.
This film "Napoleon" starts with a wrong cast in the lead role and is without content and boring! - no depth, no story! - superficial in its progression and lackluster in its presentation! - A pity! - What brought the director there? Most of the roles are wrong and no one has fun! It's a shame for the director, who could have used the time better! - Incomprehensible disaster!
Phoenix is too old to play Napoleon. Even more troublesome is the film is not in French.
lol was that first battle seriously that short? it just seems so cheap honestly
Highly inaccurate.
Исторически толерантная чушь. Веяние времени. Но качественно красиво снятая. Разовое кино.
Mumumumumumumu
I’ll pass.
Terrible movie in every respect.
Napoléon was never the same after that ass whooping from the Haitians.
napoleon feels so bland in this movie, he has no charisma ... was so boring to watch....he was a general, emperor, yet in this movie he is dulll...
что за вымышленная битва? Зимой Наполеон бежал из России.
Поменьше верьте псевдоисторическим картинкам-комиксам. Читайте настоящую историю.
This movie was so horrible waterloo 1970 was so much better
I watched the film in the cinema. Complete nonsense. Wasted my time and money.
The more mediocrity left bad reviews the more this movie gets more tickets sold out in the theater. Good marketing but helped by the stupidity. History always repeat.
The scenes with Josephine in them were ridiculous and pointless. Her foolish comments and her contributions in the film, helped to poison this movie. Josephine was not necessary. That is what happens when you take a footnote and try to make it the star of the show. Disaster.
Pluss they butcherd the napoleonic wars 😢😢😢😢
As always hollywood ruins another potential good war/history movie.
This is a Netflix TV mini series with one hour cut out to make a movie out of it .
Hopefully the TV series with the missing one hour added back in will improve things .
러시아 원정 떠났다 개털린 나폴레옹 역사상 겨울에 러시아를 정복한 국가는 몽골...
W filmie bzdury są
Need a bit more meat on the bone: how bout his rise from a mere artillery officer, his army burned and raped Europe, more on Borodino, Waterloo, etc...
non mi e piacuto nella mia opinione molti errori di storia militare purtroppo
Napoleon has been described as a megalomaniac. That Phoenix chappy seems to have been born for the part. He seems attracted to weird, psychotic characters. Not an actor I enjoy.
Id suggest watching some of his more wholesome roles like Johnny cash In walk the line
In which he played a moody drug-addicted bully. About par for the course.
i dont think its a good movie
What if you were a script writer and you used political cartoons as your source info? What if the director and lead actor never read a book about Napoleon. You would get this movie. It is one of the worst historical movies I have ever seen. They didn’t even get the battle scene correct. I am a military and Napoleonic historian. I figured it would be bad, but not worthless.
Stupid movie.
Absolute rubbish movie, wasted time I will never get back.