Well you see he is a man of faith. That he will one day be able to retire in West Palm Beach. He is a believer in the Almighty dollar. But really he is a useful idiot. The book shows that - the rich will explode his ideas to delay delay delay - justice delayed is justice not given.
Japanese children spend their first 2 years of school just learning manners and social norms, would it hurt for western children to do with at least a years worth of civics.
Yes!!! Great point ! We cannot have liberty without self-restraint and informal guides to social cooperation that tradition, customs, and morals provide.
@@kristenbell6196 Learning morals and religion as well as customs are a vital part of a child's education. It's not just the parents' responsibility. But we certainly don't want those whom we oppose on religion and ethics to have anything to do with the education of our children.
I was driving home and this randomly came up on the radio and it captivated my attention immediately. What an interesting book and an interesting talk.
As an independent voter, im done with the democratic party. I hate to say it. Its not what it used to be. Theres so much hatred, and disingenuous people coming at me simply for stating my stance! Republicans never treated me that way! We need UNITY!
Indeed. I too am independent and now see the Democrat party as the greatest threat to the liberty, prosperity & future of Americans. And most Democrat voters have no clue the tyranny and subversion they vote for because they’re propagandized, low-information people who often believe in their moral superiority.we need sophisticated citizens who recognize propaganda, marketing & advertising w/ basic understanding of psychology and logic. And we need a society that values virtue & decency.
So you are OK with a president who breaks the law being to go free. What happened if the president stood up & laughing & said because of the SC giving me complete immunity I sold the nuclear codes to Russia.
@@Mike-cr5ez Depends on the statutes. Not all statutes = lawlessness because not all statutes are unconstitutional but many are. If the world suffers from too much law then its because of too much government since government is the reason for law. Constitutionally Congress should only be convened and in session by the times given in the Constitution. Representatives were never meant to be career politicians. They were meant to be with their constituents in their home states, not in the Capitol except at times given in the Constitution. The nation is almost always better off when Congress is not in session making more unconstitutional laws we don't need and never making Constitutional laws that we do need.
Lawlessness is the greater threat to liberty. When the social order breaks down, then order must be imposed by any means necessary. We saw this in the French Revolution. The breakdown in the social order set the stage for Napoleon. Lawlessness breeds tyranny. Self-control and social custom breeds true and sustainable liberty and freedom.
@prometheusrex1 the explanations of our justice system, the process of law, over regulation, the importance of civics classes (which it seems you might benefit from) the examples etc etc.. tho ibama did over regulate an appointment lib judges/DAs, all while remiv7ng some regs so he could strip us of our Bill of Rights.. but yah.. maybe listen to it again..
We are a constitutional Republic; Article 4 section 4 of the Constitution for the united States of America. All states are guaranteed a government Republic in form.
Gorsuch is saying alot more here then the surface. He is saying that things have been done wrong and are being done wrong. He saying only The People can fix and have been instructing him to Tell via Judicial Notices. He is saying judges are acting like judges....woah. he is saying administrative Tribunals are NOT Judicial Tribunals. Thats huge People. He is saying they took your stuff and they have to give it back.....Life,Liberty, Property has to have Due Process and they were Not. The Paradigm has flipped !!!! God is good.
Laws do not necessarily restrict liberty. They can protect and enhance liberty as well as freedom (which is the ability of a community to define itself). If people control themselves and pursue worthwhile goals within moral constraints then there is less of a need for statutes enforced by the government. If people lack virtue then there is more of a need to impose constraints on people. The Founders made liberty conditional on people's willingness and ability to direct their energies appropriately and respectfully of other people.
Learn the fundamental of law… the constitutions…(50+1) we have been burdened by statutes and codes which are SUPPOSED to be in pursuance of the constitutions or they are null and void
Any of those rich people take up a collection for the families and individuals discussed by Justice Gorsuch to make them whole, perhaps buy them a house that they lost litigating these B.S. claims? (Nope).
Justices (and judges too a lesser degree) need to rule on the issue before them by applying the Constitution, precedent, and legislatively passed laws, and not expand the scope of the case so they can legislate from the bench, especially when they are not bound by an ethics code, have lifetime appointments, and are completely sheltered from the electorate
Unfortunately that has always been part of the role of the courts even if it makes no sense for it to be that way. The system was in fact never very good. And so that kind of nonsense has often been needed to make the machine work. Because Congress is too dysfunctional to be able to be as responsive as it should be.
@@I_Am_Neitherso easy to say from your keyboard, all while offering no solution .. its the best system on the planet, and the USA is the most generous nation on earth.. capitalism has benefited more people on the globe since we hav existed as a human species.. so back up your negative claims with some substance, instead of just wasting pixels and O2..
@@I_Am_Neither...I think SCOTUS is back on Track with a strict adherence to Fundamental principles and the law as Written. Text, History, Traditional is what they use now. Chevron is RIP...so all that "president" and "case law" stuff is all done. It was a hoax. Not Lawful. Judges don't make law. Now he is saying Agency's don't make law. SCOTUS affirms, confirms or reaffirms the law as Written. That's it.
The power of brisk walking will change your physicality, your countenance, your mind and quite possibly your life. Practice the art of daily brisk walking for the mathematical benefits that payoff like compounding interest.
@@NoName-ge6wc Luck? May I respectfully suggest that thete is no such thing as luck? America is BLESSED to have such a man. As you say God gave him to us! He is a Blessing!
I’m still hearing that you have to sacrifice your entire life to try and fight a singular issue and maybe you will be successful. But you will for sure be broke and living in a mobile home.
I been an American for 75 years and this is the first time in my life I've been disappointed with the highest Courts in the land because they are not with the majority of America, the American people are not wrong about the United States Supreme Court Justices of today.
I've been an American my whole life, so right there we're not the same. The SCOTUS isn't right or left. The courts only job is to test the constitutionality of a case. What is disappointing about that?
In the Name of Jesus , Why can This Man threaten And Why can he be on my phone????? In the Jesus I am crying because He is Abusing me…. This My phone. I . No C I am not a B dumb Nixon 2024. What Wedding?????? What is a C?????? What is B?????????
Yeah. Unfortunately I think the tides of history show that we are likely heading to the complete collapse of society, and a reversion to violence. Hearing someone this reasonable is almost depressing because many of the problems he is describing are as much symptoms of our declining society as much as they are an additional factor that is rectifiable.
It's unfortunate that we reward those that damage our republic with flashy interviews and notoriety. All his words are empty, especially those references to the founding fathers. He wouldn't know founding values if they were tattooed to the back of his eyelids. He should have to confront his failure to the Constitution every waking hour of every day. They all should.
@@RAW_GHC02 Anyone that dissented on the immunity ruling. Barrett didn't completely fail the republic either tbh. I appreciate that she only agreed in-part, her issue being the most egregious part of the ruling. Though if she had dissented in-part, she'd be much more faithful to our founding texts. The opinion itself was very poorly thought-out. The founding texts they reference ("strong executive") have absolutely nothing to do with anything. If you've read the Federalist Papers then you know exactly what I'm talking about. The text refers to a multi-headed executive branch. When they say a "strong executive" they mean they only want a single person in the highest office as to act decisively rather than two executives wasting time bickering about what to do. It has nothing to do with the powers of the office nor their consequences. The Nixon references were all about civil law and they used it as a way to apply criminal law in a 1:1 manner, as if they are one and the same. It's an objectively bad opinion, even if you agree with the result. When you read and research this ruling, it becomes painfully clear that they made a political decision first and then tried to find any historical and legal justification for it, no matter how weak that justification is. Look, we created the republic because we wanted a nation of laws and not men. Well now we have a President who cannot even be questioned about a crime, so long as they use official means to execute that crime. If you're a historically keen American and you love our founding ideals, there is just no way that this sits right with you.
You need to cite the grievances you have with him or a specific ruling so we know what your objections are rather than just virtue signaling your indignation....
Agreed, he is an American in name only. A kingmaker cannot be American in their values. That said, it's drivel not dribble! And that is the perfect word for it.
Justice Gorsuch js the biggest advocate and proponent of indigenous rights that has ever sat on the court. You clearly have yet to read one of his opinions outside of Dobbs. Even then, I doubt you read any of it.
@chomskysfavefive How are indigenous rights and our ethical obligation of upholding treaties not "relevant?" Some would argue respecting these very basic rights is imperative to a functioning republic and true to our founding principles. You obviously feel it is not significant and have whitewashed the issue.
Can somebody, ANY BODY
Tell me why Democrats hate this man! Chuck Schumer, tell us why you hate with vitriol this man?
He disagrees with T. Woodrow Wilson, and they do not. In fact, they love his ideas.
Well you see he is a man of faith. That he will one day be able to retire in West Palm Beach. He is a believer in the Almighty dollar. But really he is a useful idiot. The book shows that - the rich will explode his ideas to delay delay delay - justice delayed is justice not given.
@@davidweihe6052 then my question becomes, why do the dumbest people on earth think there the smartest?
@@ronammologist16because it interferes with dems getting bribes from soros and arabella..
Japanese children spend their first 2 years of school just learning manners and social norms, would it hurt for western children to do with at least a years worth of civics.
Yes!!! Great point ! We cannot have liberty without self-restraint and informal guides to social cooperation that tradition, customs, and morals provide.
The parents are in charge of that. We create our children, we are responsible for their upbringing.
@@kristenbell6196 Learning morals and religion as well as customs are a vital part of a child's education. It's not just the parents' responsibility. But we certainly don't want those whom we oppose on religion and ethics to have anything to do with the education of our children.
I was driving home and this randomly came up on the radio and it captivated my attention immediately. What an interesting book and an interesting talk.
The later part of his talk is very relevant. What is wrong with teaching civics and having civil discourse?
Agreed, but Neil Gorsuch was very interesting from start to finish.
Trump did a good job with this appointee!
The more laws you make the more criminals you create
Laws on corporations posing as personhood can be unlimited. They have no feelings.
As an independent voter, im done with the democratic party. I hate to say it. Its not what it used to be. Theres so much hatred, and disingenuous people coming at me simply for stating my stance! Republicans never treated me that way! We need UNITY!
There are no political parties in our constitutions… praise God
Indeed. I too am independent and now see the Democrat party as the greatest threat to the liberty, prosperity & future of Americans. And most Democrat voters have no clue the tyranny and subversion they vote for because they’re propagandized, low-information people who often believe in their moral superiority.we need sophisticated citizens who recognize propaganda, marketing & advertising w/ basic understanding of psychology and logic. And we need a society that values virtue & decency.
So you are OK with a president who breaks the law being to go free.
What happened if the president stood up & laughing & said because of the SC giving me complete immunity I sold the nuclear codes to Russia.
*The world suffers from too much law, not lawlessness*
The world suffers from too many statutes.
Constitution = Law of the Land
Too many statutes = Lawlessness.
@@Mike-cr5ez Depends on the statutes. Not all statutes = lawlessness because not all statutes are unconstitutional but many are. If the world suffers from too much law then its because of too much government since government is the reason for law. Constitutionally Congress should only be convened and in session by the times given in the Constitution. Representatives were never meant to be career politicians. They were meant to be with their constituents in their home states, not in the Capitol except at times given in the Constitution. The nation is almost always better off when Congress is not in session making more unconstitutional laws we don't need and never making Constitutional laws that we do need.
@@Mike-cr5ez More laws, less liberty, more costs, less innovation. The idea of law is about preserving liberty equally.
Lawlessness is the greater threat to liberty. When the social order breaks down, then order must be imposed by any means necessary. We saw this in the French Revolution. The breakdown in the social order set the stage for Napoleon. Lawlessness breeds tyranny. Self-control and social custom breeds true and sustainable liberty and freedom.
@@christophergraves6725 We aren't against all laws. Only laws to preserve liberties should remain.
13:15 is the actual start.
Thanks much
Thank you
it all matters.. start at the beginning 0:01
A veeeeeeeery good video. Very eye opening. 👍
Lol, no detail for why that is so.
@prometheusrex1 the explanations of our justice system, the process of law, over regulation, the importance of civics classes (which it seems you might benefit from) the examples etc etc..
tho ibama did over regulate an appointment lib judges/DAs, all while remiv7ng some regs so he could strip us of our Bill of Rights..
but yah.. maybe listen to it again..
@@prometheusrex1 ^^^
Thanks!
We are a constitutional Republic; Article 4 section 4 of the Constitution for the united States of America. All states are guaranteed a government Republic in form.
Sir , um , how can we get this problem to the rest of the country .
And I believe the world could benefit greatly too .
Gorsuch is saying alot more here then the surface.
He is saying that things have been done wrong and are being done wrong. He saying only The People can fix and have been instructing him to Tell via Judicial Notices. He is saying judges are acting like judges....woah. he is saying administrative Tribunals are NOT Judicial Tribunals. Thats huge People. He is saying they took your stuff and they have to give it back.....Life,Liberty, Property has to have Due Process and they were Not. The Paradigm has flipped !!!! God is good.
Laws do not necessarily restrict liberty. They can protect and enhance liberty as well as freedom (which is the ability of a community to define itself). If people control themselves and pursue worthwhile goals within moral constraints then there is less of a need for statutes enforced by the government. If people lack virtue then there is more of a need to impose constraints on people. The Founders made liberty conditional on people's willingness and ability to direct their energies appropriately and respectfully of other people.
8:29 makes me miss the Weather Channel in the 90s.
Huh?
Love the title
Neil Gorsuch's book says we have too many laws.
His decision on our current abortion issues just created 50 (states) individual laws.
I had forgotten about aaron swartz. He didnt deserve it.
Learn the fundamental of law… the constitutions…(50+1) we have been burdened by statutes and codes which are SUPPOSED to be in pursuance of the constitutions or they are null and void
I'll take...
Null and Void
For $500....Alex
…they raided the home of Nero Wolf? Unimaginable!
Were guns allowed in the venue?
Any of those rich people take up a collection for the families and individuals discussed by Justice Gorsuch to make them whole, perhaps buy them a house that they lost litigating these B.S. claims? (Nope).
Justices (and judges too a lesser degree) need to rule on the issue before them by applying the Constitution, precedent, and legislatively passed laws, and not expand the scope of the case so they can legislate from the bench, especially when they are not bound by an ethics code, have lifetime appointments, and are completely sheltered from the electorate
Except when appointed by the proper party, when they must rule as the Democrats want. At least, so say the partisans of that party.
Unfortunately that has always been part of the role of the courts even if it makes no sense for it to be that way.
The system was in fact never very good.
And so that kind of nonsense has often been needed to make the machine work.
Because Congress is too dysfunctional to be able to be as responsive as it should be.
Not everything is partisan. Your reply is precisely why everyone should agree that bipartisan reform of SCOTUS is long overdue.
@@I_Am_Neitherso easy to say from your keyboard, all while offering no solution .. its the best system on the planet, and the USA is the most generous nation on earth.. capitalism has benefited more people on the globe since we hav existed as a human species..
so back up your negative claims with some substance, instead of just wasting pixels and O2..
@@I_Am_Neither...I think SCOTUS is back on Track with a strict adherence to Fundamental principles and the law as Written.
Text, History, Traditional is what they use now. Chevron is RIP...so all that "president" and "case law" stuff is all done. It was a hoax. Not Lawful. Judges don't make law. Now he is saying Agency's don't make law. SCOTUS affirms, confirms or reaffirms the law as Written. That's it.
are you listening speaker of the house?
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch at the Nixon Library
The human toll of too much law is the result of too much government.
Yayyy🎉
All the more reasons for an article V Convention!
🎖️
The power of brisk walking will change your physicality, your countenance, your mind and quite possibly your life. Practice the art of daily brisk walking for the mathematical benefits that payoff like compounding interest.
Federal Judge should NOT have any party affiliations, period!!! And abolish the lifetime term of the supreme court judges.
...im not a crook... VV
America is lucky to have a brilliant patriot like Neil on the Court. God Almighty ordained that Garland would be shelved and Gorsuch would rise up.
@@NoName-ge6wc
Luck? May I respectfully suggest that thete is no such thing as luck?
America is BLESSED to have such a man.
As you say God gave him to us! He is a Blessing!
@@ronammologist16 agree. And it was also no luck when Ginsberg croaked.
Try the toll of misrepresenting justice!
Orchids...Russia
I’m still hearing that you have to sacrifice your entire life to try and fight a singular issue and maybe you will be successful. But you will for sure be broke and living in a mobile home.
I been an American for 75 years and this is the first time in my life I've been disappointed with the highest Courts in the land because they are not with the majority of America, the American people are not wrong about the United States Supreme Court Justices of today.
"with the majority of America" vs. the Constitution of the USA?
I've been an American my whole life, so right there we're not the same. The SCOTUS isn't right or left. The courts only job is to test the constitutionality of a case. What is disappointing about that?
LAAA - Leave Americans Alone Again and MAGA will happen.
Tgis MAGA justice is not deserving of being called "your Honor"!
In the Name of Jesus , Why can This Man threaten And Why can he be on my phone????? In the Jesus I am crying because He is Abusing me…. This My phone. I . No C I am not a B dumb Nixon 2024. What Wedding?????? What is a C?????? What is B?????????
KEN N EDYS ASSASINATIONS IVE GOT NO MEMORY SYSTEM REALLY ONE PAGE READ NOW 2 SECONNDS MOVIE I SAW HERSPRINGFIELD TINA TURNER MERGE
Yeah. Unfortunately I think the tides of history show that we are likely heading to the complete collapse of society, and a reversion to violence. Hearing someone this reasonable is almost depressing because many of the problems he is describing are as much symptoms of our declining society as much as they are an additional factor that is rectifiable.
The United States should follow the High Court of Australia where judges must retire at 70 instead of lifetime appointments👨⚖️🤔👩⚖️⚖️🧑⚖️🇺🇲
you run your country.. we'll run ours..
Why i wrote the book - money please money me need money i need
He, along with others, were put on notice to declare what is written
Dixon or Nixon or whatever he is.....
It's unfortunate that we reward those that damage our republic with flashy interviews and notoriety.
All his words are empty, especially those references to the founding fathers. He wouldn't know founding values if they were tattooed to the back of his eyelids.
He should have to confront his failure to the Constitution every waking hour of every day. They all should.
Who on the court is not a failure to the constitution in your opinion and who is true to these "founding principles"
@@RAW_GHC02 Anyone that dissented on the immunity ruling. Barrett didn't completely fail the republic either tbh. I appreciate that she only agreed in-part, her issue being the most egregious part of the ruling. Though if she had dissented in-part, she'd be much more faithful to our founding texts.
The opinion itself was very poorly thought-out. The founding texts they reference ("strong executive") have absolutely nothing to do with anything. If you've read the Federalist Papers then you know exactly what I'm talking about. The text refers to a multi-headed executive branch. When they say a "strong executive" they mean they only want a single person in the highest office as to act decisively rather than two executives wasting time bickering about what to do. It has nothing to do with the powers of the office nor their consequences.
The Nixon references were all about civil law and they used it as a way to apply criminal law in a 1:1 manner, as if they are one and the same. It's an objectively bad opinion, even if you agree with the result.
When you read and research this ruling, it becomes painfully clear that they made a political decision first and then tried to find any historical and legal justification for it, no matter how weak that justification is.
Look, we created the republic because we wanted a nation of laws and not men. Well now we have a President who cannot even be questioned about a crime, so long as they use official means to execute that crime.
If you're a historically keen American and you love our founding ideals, there is just no way that this sits right with you.
You need to cite the grievances you have with him or a specific ruling so we know what your objections are rather than just virtue signaling your indignation....
Those that degrade what he says has no understanding of our highest law… the Constitutions (50+1)
@@rksocal2828 Presidential immunity of course, but obviously you already knew that.
Don't care to listen to this man's dribble. He should step down.
Agreed, he is an American in name only. A kingmaker cannot be American in their values.
That said, it's drivel not dribble! And that is the perfect word for it.
Justice Gorsuch js the biggest advocate and proponent of indigenous rights that has ever sat on the court. You clearly have yet to read one of his opinions outside of Dobbs. Even then, I doubt you read any of it.
@@RAW_GHC02 Not at all relevant.
@chomskysfavefive
How are indigenous rights and our ethical obligation of upholding treaties not "relevant?" Some would argue respecting these very basic rights is imperative to a functioning republic and true to our founding principles. You obviously feel it is not significant and have whitewashed the issue.
@@RAW_GHC02 The justice, endorsing an imperial presidency, and presidential immunity far outweighs his support of indigenous rights.