'I Think We All See The Problem Around Us': Justice Gorsuch Discusses Book Decrying 'Too Much Law'

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 138

  • @danielarinard8327
    @danielarinard8327 2 місяці тому +21

    Thank you, Justice Gorsuch, for speaking the truth and bringing us back to the fundamental principles ♥️ I got your book today ♥️

  • @mammothworks
    @mammothworks 2 місяці тому +2

    This was such an enjoyable talk! Thank you Justice Gorsuch, I'll be looking forward to this read and so thankful to have some mindful, caring, small government minded judges in our SCOTUS. We would be totally screwed without yall. It shouldn't be weird to hear Justices talk to Americans..we need more of it.

  • @Anna-uu2fw
    @Anna-uu2fw 2 місяці тому +28

    All Justices should write more books and speak to the public. THANK YOU

    • @sevom89walker86
      @sevom89walker86 2 місяці тому

      I think they def need to speak publicly more so the lefties could see that they actually care about America and are good people

  • @gjv001
    @gjv001 2 місяці тому +9

    We all owe Neil Gorsuch a big thanks for bringing this issue out into the open. Thank you Neil.

  • @briancross6820
    @briancross6820 2 місяці тому +14

    POSITION of TRUST 🙏 LIVE and LET LIVE 💖

  • @martaupward5992
    @martaupward5992 2 місяці тому +3

    This was such a treat.
    Thank you Justice Gorsuch for a lifetime of integrity. We appreciate your service.

  • @danielarinard8327
    @danielarinard8327 2 місяці тому +8

    And thank you to the hosts for hosting ♥️

  • @timothycowdrey1327
    @timothycowdrey1327 2 місяці тому +4

    This was a very pleasant view considering the subject of our present society

  • @paulbunion1244
    @paulbunion1244 2 місяці тому +3

    A brilliant, compassionate man who has fortified the SCOTUS.

  • @andreamoon5534
    @andreamoon5534 2 місяці тому +3

    About time! good to remember what the Pledge of Allegiance says!!!

  • @livetohash6152
    @livetohash6152 2 місяці тому +4

    What a great man💯👍🏻👍🏻

  • @teambz9166
    @teambz9166 2 місяці тому +43

    If you dont like Gorsuch, try reading some of his case opinions, will give you a better insight than just listening to what others say about him.

    • @yepyep340
      @yepyep340 2 місяці тому +5

      The more I read him the more I am able to affirm I do not like him.

    • @joshhawkins2765
      @joshhawkins2765 2 місяці тому +1

      @@yepyep340read Harrington v. Purdue Pharma

    • @Adam1_7_7_6
      @Adam1_7_7_6 2 місяці тому +5

      @@yepyep340Then you are in the WRONG country because he follows constitutional law. You will adhere to it as well or there will be problems. He’s following the orders of our founding fathers and that will be adhered to.

    • @007kingifrit
      @007kingifrit 2 місяці тому

      @@yepyep340 what have you read that you don't like?

    • @yepyep340
      @yepyep340 2 місяці тому +2

      @@007kingifrit Frozen trucker case. +
      He dose not think workers should make decisions concerning their own health or life. Especially collectively. He is an enemy of human liberty.

  • @edbrophy4602
    @edbrophy4602 2 місяці тому +11

    Justice Gorsuch was talking about "Alexis De Tocqueville's" quotes about early America: 'The greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults. But a democracy can only obtain truth as the result of experience, and many nations may forfeit their existence whilst they are awaiting the consequences of their errors.” (More of Tocqueville's book quotes at Goodreads)

  • @SonjaShindler
    @SonjaShindler 2 місяці тому +14

    This was such great fun to watch. I loved it. Thank you.

  • @motordaddyjl
    @motordaddyjl 2 місяці тому +1

    Must watch!

  • @huntersmillie00
    @huntersmillie00 2 місяці тому +3

    His story of that commercial fisherman is scary. My question is, how did we get to this point?

  • @mitzilangpitman4491
    @mitzilangpitman4491 2 місяці тому +24

    I love our Supreme Court. Total respect. ❤

  • @jazumi7798
    @jazumi7798 2 місяці тому +5

    This is the guy the libs hate so much??? Kind thoughtful and caring. IMO.

    • @Andygarrett357
      @Andygarrett357 2 місяці тому

      They don't have Justice Scalia anylonger.

  • @originalgangsta794
    @originalgangsta794 2 місяці тому +5

    Great interview

  • @ileanafedo8196
    @ileanafedo8196 2 місяці тому +1

    This was beautiful , thank you

  • @MK-iy7im
    @MK-iy7im 2 місяці тому +2

    Amazing

  • @Christian_w_Logistics
    @Christian_w_Logistics 2 місяці тому +3

    Refund policy. Dave Jose is the og we the people by God learned the law. Now Gorsuch telling. Amen. God is mighty. REFUND POLICY. GIVE IT ALL BACK THAT WAS TAKEN WITHOUT LAW.
    THE PEOPLE ARE COMING!

    • @007kingifrit
      @007kingifrit 2 місяці тому

      what on earth did you try to right here. refund policy is not a sentence on its own.

  • @mnavidadlares9519
    @mnavidadlares9519 2 місяці тому +3

    Gorsuch is correct that the population of the United States, is the one that needs to solve the problems in this country. However, the problem lies not in an excess of laws but in the fact that executive branch agencies are enacting regulations without explicit congressional authorization. These administrative courts are unconstitutional and better said, their laws are a nullity. Gorsuch should explicitly state in this interview that agencies lack the authority to create laws, since it is not granted by the people in any constitution, not in the state nor the US constitution.

    • @007kingifrit
      @007kingifrit 2 місяці тому +1

      well we fixed that problem with the recent decision

  • @crevecouer6772
    @crevecouer6772 2 місяці тому +3

    There are so many pinheads in law enforcement and prosecutors today it’s a fact. Just as the Justice reported.

    • @WeRunderSeige
      @WeRunderSeige 2 місяці тому

      Lot of lawfare. Lot of political attacks against opponents. America is in a great decline. And one political party doesn't approve of Supreme Court rulings so they want to destroy the constitution and the Supreme Court and make it full of judged who are bought and paid for who will always vote for one political party whether it's the fact of law or not. Americans cannot allow this to happen. Our country is under attack.

  • @Alkhciosbihadal
    @Alkhciosbihadal 2 місяці тому +9

    "And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them. Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres. Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute: That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation; From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation. Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered" - Luke 11:46-52

    • @cherylfitch3183
      @cherylfitch3183 Місяць тому

      Excellent! Thanks for putting this out there…..

  • @SirChucklenutsTM
    @SirChucklenutsTM 2 місяці тому +1

    They're trying to build a prison for you and me to live in.
    I know the prison system.

  • @buckiemohawk3643
    @buckiemohawk3643 2 місяці тому +4

    The problem is that they make laws to go after people and then use those laws against regular people. Stop making new laws

    • @WeRunderSeige
      @WeRunderSeige 2 місяці тому +1

      Thats in congress and senate

    • @tulaloo6526
      @tulaloo6526 2 місяці тому

      So there should be no laws regulating AI, social media or any new technology on the horizon?

    • @WeRunderSeige
      @WeRunderSeige 2 місяці тому +1

      @@tulaloo6526 there def should be on AI. And social media should not be allowed to be bullied by fbi cia politically to shut down free speech period.

    • @tulaloo6526
      @tulaloo6526 2 місяці тому

      @WeRunderSeige funny that you think free speech is guaranteed in a business. Free speech is guaranteed not to be infringed upon by government only. I own my own business and your speech in my establishment might get you booted from my business.

  • @kimber0256
    @kimber0256 2 місяці тому +11

    Gorsuch was a great hire!

  • @lanhmartel5655
    @lanhmartel5655 2 місяці тому +11

    we love our supreme court!!

  • @peterthompson6651
    @peterthompson6651 2 місяці тому +2

    It sounds as if he does not know what the word "Justice" is rooted in by its etymology dictionary definition.
    Justice, who "Lady Justice" really is, the first Roman Emperor and who he worshipped, was the "goddess Iustitia/Justitia" whom we get as the first "Lady Justice," and the Second Roman emperor Tiberius built temples for her which we call today "Justice Centres" and where that "goddess Iustitia/Justitia" still sits today as "Lady Justice." That is why judges wear robes in courts, as they are
    "Representing" a woman (Lady Justice), and they copy the UK, In the UK at the State Opening of Parliament those senior judges still wear knee breeches, two pairs of stockings (So their leg hairs do not protrude through, very unladylike), a robe and a wig (very unladylike to have a bald head) portraying "Lady Justice," and they know precisely who they are "Representing "The goddess Iustitia/Justitia." It means they have turned their backs on God, in favour of a female god.
    When we go into those courts it is not before the one true God, our creator, the Father in Heaven, a man/woman is not allowed to be seen or heard unless they do so as a "Corporate Person."
    This man cannot be ignorant not to know this is true, he cannot plead nescience only ignorance, both mean "Lack of knowing" for two very different reasons. Nescience is "Not knowing" the knowledge because they have never been taught in the first place as it is not their trade, but someone who should know their trade is "Willfully disregarded, and Refusal," of the truth, is completely "Ignorant" and that carries the "Blame." How can he not believe the system is not corrupt, he should know it inside out: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told a Senate hearing when asked why the Constitution does not apply in court replied "It simply doesn't," and not one of them senators asked a follow-up question, "Why."
    He knows why the constitution does not apply, as it only applies to men/women, those courts only allow the"Person" to be "PreZ-ent/Pre-Zent," and not a man/woman as they have no authority over any man/woman as they were created by the Father in Heaven, and only he sit in judgment of what he created.
    Whereas Stae and Federal State, sit in judgment of what they created the "Person" called a "Corporate Person," the all-caps letters that do not conform grammatically to correct English grammar and are saying nothing in English, the people do not know this is true. If the all-caps lettering is not English, then what language is it?
    Have you ever been asked, "What manual style of English, do you use?" Most people look at you gone out because they have never even thought about it, The legal system uses what?
    The State/Federal governments are not subrogated to the constitution because people subrogate themselves by becoming the corporate person that the State/federal governments created the "Decedent," in the all-caps name (SURNAME and TITLE) the name of an estate, the estate is only made for the decedent (Dead Person), so they created the fictional name in the all-caps, and it is not truly dead, it is not living, it an entity like a business name (Corporation). We "Represent" it by giving it life by breathing life into it and giving it life to exist, and fall into dishonour because we never created it, and that theft. We cannot say we are it, as it was created by someone else, and they own what they made: the 16th edition, and earlier copies of the "Chicago Manual Style of English" would tell us on pages 664, 665, and 666 it is Sign Language.
    664: ASL (American Sign Language) is used by the Deaf and Mute to communicate.
    665: The Sign Language of the illiterate, who use all kinds of signs and symbols, "Indicators, Arrows for straight on, turn left and right, picture for roundabouts, T-junctions, crossroads, pub signs...
    666: The language of corporations that have "signs" above and outside of all commercial business, those placards are even called "Signs," why because that is the language they are written in "Sign Language."
    Confucius: "Signs and Symbols rule the world, not rules and law."
    Confucius: "We all have two lives, the second one begins when we realise we only have one."
    The legal System is for the dead, the ignorant that have consented to Represent something the State/Federal government has created that is controlled by corporations that are owned by the "Few."
    What languages use the all-caps letters Hebrew without the vowels, Ancient Greek and Latin, and who still uses Latin, if not the "legal system and the Church of Roman" that was joined by the Roman Emperor Constantine 1700 years ago. Most people do not know that English is the hidden six romance language believing it is a Germanic language but how many words come directly from Latin, or through French especially used in the legal system.
    The Father in Heaven created, the man in his image both male and female, that lives, not something on paper, plastic, and a computer screen that represents the dead (The man in the mirror).

  • @JA51711
    @JA51711 2 місяці тому +1

    Crooks might. It have been the only one involved

  • @petehoney1
    @petehoney1 2 місяці тому +1

    democracy ... why not try 'harmony' .. Harmony is certainly under threat in US ?

  • @america9546
    @america9546 2 місяці тому +5

    God is speaking through his people!

  • @originalgangsta794
    @originalgangsta794 2 місяці тому +1

    I respect the True ownership of doing unpopular things. As well as any important thing. Hard unpopular for few is essential for God (governance of diversity) for the better good of We;

  • @dawnshire2069
    @dawnshire2069 2 місяці тому +1

    The difference between law and regulations is law is about path of universal conduct regulations is about limitations. The crux of law is orders or should i say how a principal of system works for example the constitution or 10 commenment. We should make people dont want to commit crime instead of held suspicions accountable. I would suggest change it to fine instead of jail for unintentionally convictions. Too much regulation limits the freedom of people to judge wisely for overall goods.

  • @tracyshoemake9686
    @tracyshoemake9686 2 місяці тому +1

    2 Many,anything Government.

  • @abgzulkifli
    @abgzulkifli 2 місяці тому +2

    its done

  • @RachelJoyceAllen
    @RachelJoyceAllen 2 місяці тому +2

    Vote for Rachel Joyce Allen for President of the United States of America I am The one that holds the light for The Tree of Life.

    • @Adam1_7_7_6
      @Adam1_7_7_6 2 місяці тому +1

      Ummm NO! The only ONE that holds the light for “The Tree of Life” is Jesus Christ. No human being can even come close.

  • @sheppe4307
    @sheppe4307 2 місяці тому

    😊

  • @johnraber2486
    @johnraber2486 2 місяці тому

    😅we don’t go to church

  • @OhNo-u3v
    @OhNo-u3v 2 місяці тому +1

    Wrh is he babling about.

  • @LARRYANIEL-dz9zz
    @LARRYANIEL-dz9zz 2 місяці тому

    DEMS N.S.A. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

  • @thefunhouse-jayburchfinear7617
    @thefunhouse-jayburchfinear7617 2 місяці тому +3

    Vote for Bobby Kennedy. He will get rid of dumb laws.

    • @theresamckenna3176
      @theresamckenna3176 2 місяці тому

      He can’t do it by himself it takes democrats and republicans to agree on it first

    • @Adam1_7_7_6
      @Adam1_7_7_6 2 місяці тому

      No. ONLY Trump will do that. Trump got our SC flipped and now it follows constitutional law. We OWE Trump the WH for another run. He saved us and now we save him. Simple!

    • @skyangel6336
      @skyangel6336 2 місяці тому +1

      A vote for Kamala is all that will accomplish!

  • @adtiamzon3663
    @adtiamzon3663 2 місяці тому

    Lazyness?! 👽🧐 Self-interest?!🤔🤑 Instead of doing extensive research and interpretation of past and current laws and practices, why not just create, draft, and pass your own laws?! Why not!!? 🤐🤡🤑👹

    • @youn8e
      @youn8e 2 місяці тому

      #Maladministration is the State Constitutional Republic's approach to #Instructing the Men and Women who take an #Oath to Honor and Uphold all ARTICLES of those State Constitution and Bills of Rights. We the people are asked to #Instruct those Serving, thru their Oath of #Trust, to return to the Fundamental principles of #LAW ‼️Was that #MAXIMS that we are hearing from Gorsuch ⁉️Read your State Constitution and the Maxims of Law which are fundamental to our ability to use the proper form of #INSTRUCTION to Require, thru State Constitutional #NOTICE, our #LEGIS to move as the People have stated their wishes. We the people have put GORSUCH on NOTICE...just so you know ‼️We the people are learning fast to put the #SERVANTS on State Constitutional #NOTICE‼️💜🙏💜

  • @taterbites
    @taterbites 2 місяці тому

    Justice Gorsuch sounds like Jack Benny to me!

  • @dmfardenryan
    @dmfardenryan 2 місяці тому +5

    I am looking right into the face of what's wrong with America. How dare u lecture us on anything until u have the balls to clean up your own house Sir. I rest my case.

    • @franklincone4636
      @franklincone4636 2 місяці тому +7

      You didnt prove anything other than accuse him of a dirty house

    • @Adam1_7_7_6
      @Adam1_7_7_6 2 місяці тому

      He’s not lecturing you. It’s easy to spot the washed up liberals at this point. All emotion 24/7. Folks are tired of it. God bless this justice for standing and following the ORDERS of our Constitution.

    • @007kingifrit
      @007kingifrit 2 місяці тому +1

      yea we have no idea even WHAT you are accusing him of doing wrong. what a poorly written comment.

    • @tulaloo6526
      @tulaloo6526 2 місяці тому

      @@007kingifrit ruling that a President is above the law goes against our Constitution, let alone common F'ing sense. No man is above the law

  • @yepyep340
    @yepyep340 2 місяці тому +4

    STOLEN Seat!

    • @Adam1_7_7_6
      @Adam1_7_7_6 2 місяці тому +8

      Says the commie

    • @007kingifrit
      @007kingifrit 2 місяці тому

      we have no obligation to vote on a nomination, there is no law saying this has to be done.

    • @yepyep340
      @yepyep340 2 місяці тому

      @@007kingifrit okay Moscow Mitch. Keep your culture of losing STRONG👍

    • @JingJao
      @JingJao 2 місяці тому +1

      @@yepyep340 Let's not forget WHO CHANGED THE RULES. Democrat Harry Reid D-NV changed the rule allowing judges to be confirmed by a simple majority.
      YOU changed the rules. It's YOUR fault.

    • @yepyep340
      @yepyep340 2 місяці тому

      @@JingJao and we will change the rules again. duh