While this breakdown achieves the objective that it pursues i.e, bypassing the trifles of small talk to get into the stuff one cares about is charming. At least that's how I interpreted it. And I must say, the articulation was clean and the presentation crisp. But my grouse is with how the clip implies that small talk being boring makes it less desirable or useful. Case in point - Around 3:25, the interviewer sets the premise to a question and it's answered before it's completed. Due credit to Shahid for being proactive, but thinking the question was yes-or-no and not open-ended, to me, seems misguided. I'm a newbie cricket journalist and from the little I can tell, asking why the question was asked is often more revealing than the answer provided. Shahid did change the direction of the question but to think that addressing the point or providing closure is the key feature or outcome of the method he uses discounts the fact that the question, about transition, did facilitate introspection. The comfort that the boredom of small talk opens up avenues to connect. And with practice, its methods too, will attract the audience that one desires. That's the point-of-view stuff done. If something isn't clear or there are errors, please let me know. And I'd love to hear your opinions too, anywhere in the spectrum of total agreement to total disagreement. Cheers
By any chance do you also follow or know Charisma on Command ? It's always good to see the same template brought into the Bollywood scene. Charisma on Command did the same for the Western World. After watching 5 videos, if we can pick at least one technique from each one, the job is done.
You cannot mimic him. That's his personality. You can take these tips, but in the end you need experience to be comfortable like him
Amazing work dude ❤
Wonderful inside.
Thanks
What a video brother 🎉❤
Keep up the amazing work 👍❤️
great one
While this breakdown achieves the objective that it pursues i.e, bypassing the trifles of small talk to get into the stuff one cares about is charming. At least that's how I interpreted it. And I must say, the articulation was clean and the presentation crisp.
But my grouse is with how the clip implies that small talk being boring makes it less desirable or useful. Case in point - Around 3:25, the interviewer sets the premise to a question and it's answered before it's completed.
Due credit to Shahid for being proactive, but thinking the question was yes-or-no and not open-ended, to me, seems misguided.
I'm a newbie cricket journalist and from the little I can tell, asking why the question was asked is often more revealing than the answer provided.
Shahid did change the direction of the question but to think that addressing the point or providing closure is the key feature or outcome of the method he uses discounts the fact that the question, about transition, did facilitate introspection.
The comfort that the boredom of small talk opens up avenues to connect. And with practice, its methods too, will attract the audience that one desires.
That's the point-of-view stuff done. If something isn't clear or there are errors, please let me know. And I'd love to hear your opinions too, anywhere in the spectrum of total agreement to total disagreement.
Cheers
By any chance do you also follow or know Charisma on Command ? It's always good to see the same template brought into the Bollywood scene. Charisma on Command did the same for the Western World. After watching 5 videos, if we can pick at least one technique from each one, the job is done.
I used to do research/outlining for the videos at CoC till late 2023
Still waiting for ranveer singh video