No one said that. They are not committing genocide in Gaza. There is a definition for genocide & the conflict does not in any way meet that definition. In fact, the casualty ratio is lower than any other asymmetric urban conflict. Facts matter.
That didn't stop Morning Joe from using the ADL numbers in this report. Anti-semitism on college campuses is up 700%. Does everyone know the ADL has their own UA-cam channel where you can like and subscribe and get clips of Morning Joe? This very clip is on that channel, don't forget to like and subscribe for more bonus content.
Doesn't matter -see my comment where I explain why "methodological bias" and "unreliability" are two different things on Wikipedia. I'm guessing you don't edit Wikipedia and aren't aware of this distinction.
ADL has officially stated any US "Pro Palestine" demonstrations are antisemetic. What is antisemetic about not wanting to watch a genocide take place? Why is it so hard to separate those things?
"Why is it so hard to separate those things?" Because making that valid distinction means running up against a well-established propaganda machine. As is evidenced in this reporting.
It´s not a genocide. Ridiculous notion. It requires intent. The number of palestinians have grown every year. Israel has over 2 million arab citizens most of them from that area. The israeli warfare is brutal, some argue they have no choice, if they ever wanna defeat Hamas, because of the human shield strategy of Hamas and how densely populated the area is, but they do a lot to save civilians, provide aid, let aid in, warn the civilian population etc. It´s a far cry from wanting and trying to wipe out all arabs in that area who identify as palestinians. In the sixties they only identified as arabs, in their own official papers in peace treaties and whatnot. I hope Palestine gets their own democratic country, but it doesn´t hurt to try and understand the other side.
Have u seen the demonstrations? There is no dignity or respect for social boundaries, thus they must be addressed as they are, not as they purport to be.
There isn't any evidence of a 'genocide' and merely shouting something every day doesn't make it true. What the ADL is arguing is that the naive acceptance of every anti-Israel narrative, with or without evidence, is linked to antisemitism, not that everyone shouting "genocide!" or "free Palestine!" is an antisemite.
Never Again means Never Again - genocide is wrong no matter who is committing it. I learned that from the ADL and other Jewish organizations and people.
No one ever said that Israel critic is per se anti semitism. The most critical thinkers about Israel are Isarelis themselves... As in probably every real democracy.
@@henrykmozman144Let's say that's true for the sake of your argument. "Very frequently" is insufficient to hamstring individual freedom of political speech. The fact that Jews are so spun up about criticism of Israel should tell you two things: That Israel is indeed an apartheid ethnostate with bad intentions toward anyone who doesn't fall in line with their agenda, and that the Jewish people, by and large, know that what Israel has done since its inception is indefensible absent ridiculous straw man arguments intended to silence Israel's critics.
While i'm not prepared here, to dispute what Jonathan has to say; I came in here, because i have to tell Folks, i was literally chilled to the BONE, with the tone bebe used when he talked about needing our Weapons to deal with the Gaza conflict; it sounded like he planned to raze GAZA to the ground or something!
@@themaskedman221Many of them are extremely skilled editors, some with many featured articles under their belt. Not saying that their opinion is ”more important” for that, but it grinds my gears when Greenblatt or other groups say that it’s a small number of biased editors who came to the decision in an un-due process…
@@microitos9754 But it was a small group of editors -I edit on Wiki also and I'm aware of most of the editors who were involved in this process. Yes, they're mostly skilled editors, but they also have a long history of editing almost exclusively in this I-P space and their political views of the conflict are well-known. It's not even a matter of whether the process was 'undue' (I read the Rfcs and noticeboard and it was a fairly typical deliberation) -but more so the fact that they were applying standards to the ADL that could easily apply to the Gaza Health Ministry or Al Jazeera. My rule of thumb in these cases is to determine whether other reliable sources consider ADL reliable, and for the most part that seems to be the case.
@@themaskedman221 What we consider reliable or not is whether a source aligns with the concensus of reliable sources, and the ADL doesn’t meet this standard. Their positions, such as conflation of criticism of the state and antisemitism, is in complete misalignment with the scholarly consensus of either of these topics. The Gaza Health Ministry, even though they’re run by that one group, is reliable because any third-party sources who investigated them have consistently confirmed and found their numbers to be surprisingly accurate and uninflated. Also, regarding ”biased editing”, it is not biased at all. Wikipedia is a summary of reliable secondary sources, not opinions. Just because these editors happen to make additions critical of a state doesn’t mean they or the sources are biased. Are we ”biased” for not adding any pro-Russia info in any Russia-Ukraine topic?
0:34 Unacknowledged conflict. Hillel is independent of ADL, but uses ADL's definition of what an antisemitic incident is. And ADL very recently broadened its definition of antisemitism to include anti-Zionist chants and slogans. That 700% increase could very well be explained entirely by that change, coupled with pro-Palestinian protests on campus.
But we shouldn’t listen to people when they say “Killing that many women and children really looks like genocidal practices,” right? Like there’s no excuse for antisemitism. So this isn’t about Jewish people. This about THE STATE of Israel committing genocidal acts. Netanyahu has spent his entire time in office trying to wrap Israel in the Torah so any criticism of the state somehow means you’re criticizing the religion. He’s been trying to do the same thing with the Torah and himself too.
The entire Zionist project itself is antisemitic in that the goal of Christian’s is to create the rapture by returning Jews to Israel. The entire thing is insane. Netanyahu himself has even engaged in holocaust denial
It's actually more about "film students" who've all of a sudden become experts in international law and "genocide" by reading some things on the internet. There is an open case in an international court that will be deciding this question some time in the future. Based on the rulings so far, it is quite clear the case is far more complicated than people like you seem to believe.
@@themaskedman221 it’s pretty clear cut. If you’re murdering and killing as many women and children as the IDF have since the start of this leg of the conflict (meaning since Oct 7 since this issue goes back decades), you’re committing genocidal crimes. Literally culling the birth givers and future of the people. That is textbook genocidal maneuvers. Also “the masked man” my profile is over a decade old and you can’t change your @. So it’s graduated, working professional who is actually clued in. Tell me, do you think what I said in my previous comment was antisemitic?
While the number of civilian casualties is high and horrible a number alone does not constitute grnocide (nor does the military occupation of the westbank constitues apartheid which is quite interesting given that Israel is the only state in that region in which arabs participate in a free democracy and don't have to suffer from muslim dictatorships). While the death toll still is horrible it is compared to other battles in urban areas lower than expected. The hamas caused this war and they are very happy that everyone now yells "Stop Israel" and now one cares about the ISIS-like organisation Hamas.
Because they use fake names and stay anonymous. There is nobody to appear on any tv program -one of the ringleaders of that Rfc was Iskandar 323. I mean, "he" was featured in news reports about the downgrade, but he is just a moniker and text on a screen.
Maybe the ADL could ask what Israel really wants. Where does Israel want her borders to be. Does she want peace with her neighbors or is she trying to take the whole region. The money spent, and lives lost is very expensive. That money could build a new canal from AQABA to the Mediterranean sea. From the river to the sea, two states, and very difficult to tunnel beneath a canal. But, are both sides tired of this constant killing?
We should listen to Palestinians & South Africans when they tell us what genocide & apartheid is. Also there’s NEVER been corruption at an organization that has “quarterly board meetings” 😂😂😂🤡
You cant just edit anyone you like though. There are a lot of pro European activists that wikipedia, oy vey, permanently libels and lies about, and there nothing those people can do to change that.
Newcomers diving into a hotbutton topic like I/P (Israel/Palestine) are not apt to have a fun experience. It's like telling people "Anybody can play volleyball!" and sending them into a mine field to start a game...
@@TheMacJew they care about food prices too. If you care about Jewish people you would dislike Biden. He has done the bare minimum to help and assist Israel.
This might draw attention to Wikipedia's practice of favouring liberal and left-wing sources over right-leaning and conservative sources. Russian, Chinese and Iranian state media like RT, CGTN and Press TV are also blacklisted.
The notion or "reliability" or "unreliability" of sources isn't a matter of something being "acceptable" or "banned." People can use ADL material all they want - although if it is being inserted in a tendentious manner about a controversial assertion regarding the Israel/Palestine situation and an editing arm-wrestling match follows, the ADL material is going to wind up on the cutting room floor. University press books and journal articles have the most clout; reportage from big news-gathering organizations like the New York Times nearly as much. Then we have smaller news organizations, with "unreliable" partisan material allowed the least clout. This WP decision affects only ADL material related to I/P. If the ADL smears someone as "anti-Semitic" for opposition to Israeli policy in Gaza, for example, that is not going to have much traction if the assertion is challenged. This decision is narrowly focused on Israel/Palestine and came about only because ADL has devolved into advocacy.
Liberman: Netanyahu sent Mossad head, general to Qatar, ‘begged’ it to pay Hamas Yisrael Beytenu party leader says the pair were sent by PM two weeks ago to convince Doha not to end its money transfers to the Gaza-based terror group By TOI STAFF 22 February 2020, 9:46 pm
Never be so lazy and complacent as to accept one source before you meditate upon the issue and think for yourselves. I'm for any watch dog group. After all, they should know. I trust the Southern Poverty Law Center, too. This organization was co-founded by the Great Julian Bond, civil rights activist, we don't talk about his contributions to the enforcement of civil rights legislation. What good is it if only stays on the "books" and there were no enforcement? "Faith without works is dead." This is activists on the part of information streaming, so definitely, they should be unbiased. Staying neutral. 😐 I don't agree with every position this group takes, but we have a 🧠 brain. Use it. Everyone must make up their own minds. At the end of the day, this is an attack against free speech. 💬 By "Wikipedia."
@@MrScotttraynor Nice attempt to put a spin on reality there, chief but putting Frozen Joe on the world stage more often lately to prove his cognizance has not gone as planned. You can't deny that...
ADL has become a joke under Greenblatt. It's really sad.
Under Greenblatt?! Its evil. It has always been evil. Just ask Mary Phagan about these people.
It was always demonic to those paying attention.
It always has been. Know how and why it was created? Look up Mary Phagan
I dunno “Jewish people can’t commit genocide” seems a little sus to me.
No one said that. They are not committing genocide in Gaza. There is a definition for genocide & the conflict does not in any way meet that definition. In fact, the casualty ratio is lower than any other asymmetric urban conflict. Facts matter.
@@SN-sz7kw Yes they can and already have! 60 million in USSR! Maby 100 million!
@@SN-sz7kw Then you got what America has done in Iraq all the wars for Israel! About 1 million dead in Iraq!
@@SN-sz7kw they probably committing something worse than genocide
@@SN-sz7kw What Israel is doing fits that definition! 🤦♂
They use a definition that equates criticism of Israel to antisemitism which is highly disputed.
Because it's highly ridiculous.
That didn't stop Morning Joe from using the ADL numbers in this report. Anti-semitism on college campuses is up 700%.
Does everyone know the ADL has their own UA-cam channel where you can like and subscribe and get clips of Morning Joe? This very clip is on that channel, don't forget to like and subscribe for more bonus content.
@@theamericanopry morning Joe is a conservative.
Doesn't matter -see my comment where I explain why "methodological bias" and "unreliability" are two different things on Wikipedia. I'm guessing you don't edit Wikipedia and aren't aware of this distinction.
@@themaskedman221 I am not but I believe you. I have noticed a bias that is beyond method
ADL has officially stated any US "Pro Palestine" demonstrations are antisemetic. What is antisemetic about not wanting to watch a genocide take place? Why is it so hard to separate those things?
"Why is it so hard to separate those things?"
Because making that valid distinction means running up against a well-established propaganda machine. As is evidenced in this reporting.
It´s not a genocide. Ridiculous notion. It requires intent. The number of palestinians have grown every year. Israel has over 2 million arab citizens most of them from that area. The israeli warfare is brutal, some argue they have no choice, if they ever wanna defeat Hamas, because of the human shield strategy of Hamas and how densely populated the area is, but they do a lot to save civilians, provide aid, let aid in, warn the civilian population etc. It´s a far cry from wanting and trying to wipe out all arabs in that area who identify as palestinians. In the sixties they only identified as arabs, in their own official papers in peace treaties and whatnot. I hope Palestine gets their own democratic country, but it doesn´t hurt to try and understand the other side.
Bc they support hamas maybe
Have u seen the demonstrations? There is no dignity or respect for social boundaries, thus they must be addressed as they are, not as they purport to be.
There isn't any evidence of a 'genocide' and merely shouting something every day doesn't make it true. What the ADL is arguing is that the naive acceptance of every anti-Israel narrative, with or without evidence, is linked to antisemitism, not that everyone shouting "genocide!" or "free Palestine!" is an antisemite.
The ADL says people need to listen to Jews about what antisemitism is but they will call any Jewish person antisemitic for criticizing Israel.
That is the problem the adl wants you to listen to the 'right' Jewish people. Aka the ones that agree with them
only the jews that fit there narative
You listen to Black people to know what racism is, don't you? - Why use a different standard when it comes to Jews ? - Jews don't count ?
YEP
How many PHD's don't matter if you're one sided in your beliefs.
Never Again means Never Again - genocide is wrong no matter who is committing it. I learned that from the ADL and other Jewish organizations and people.
I learned that they only care about themselves.
@@nunyabizness9955 YEP
Sanction 🇮🇱
The ADL equating anti-Zionism and/or criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism.
Very frequently it is.
No one ever said that Israel critic is per se anti semitism. The most critical thinkers about Israel are Isarelis themselves... As in probably every real democracy.
@@henrykmozman144Let's say that's true for the sake of your argument. "Very frequently" is insufficient to hamstring individual freedom of political speech. The fact that Jews are so spun up about criticism of Israel should tell you two things: That Israel is indeed an apartheid ethnostate with bad intentions toward anyone who doesn't fall in line with their agenda, and that the Jewish people, by and large, know that what Israel has done since its inception is indefensible absent ridiculous straw man arguments intended to silence Israel's critics.
People are not anti-semitic or pro-hamas. They are anti-genocide.
I reserve my right to criticize regardless of ADL and Congress trying to ban any criticism of Israel...
Same here 👍
How much they got paid to advertise for ADL?
$787.5 million.
You're right. This isn't news/journalism. This is an ad paid for by the ADL
Same owners
The whole panel is bullsh!t
While i'm not prepared here, to dispute what Jonathan has to say; I came in here, because i have to tell Folks, i was literally chilled to the BONE, with the tone bebe used when he talked about needing our Weapons to deal with the Gaza conflict; it sounded like he planned to raze GAZA to the ground or something!
I agree with Wikipedia, in this country should take note because our Congress and government keeps cuddling up to these snakes
It isn't "Wikipedia" -it was a group editors involved in that particular Rfc.
An overwhelming majority of editors*
@@themaskedman221Many of them are extremely skilled editors, some with many featured articles under their belt. Not saying that their opinion is ”more important” for that, but it grinds my gears when Greenblatt or other groups say that it’s a small number of biased editors who came to the decision in an un-due process…
@@microitos9754 But it was a small group of editors -I edit on Wiki also and I'm aware of most of the editors who were involved in this process. Yes, they're mostly skilled editors, but they also have a long history of editing almost exclusively in this I-P space and their political views of the conflict are well-known. It's not even a matter of whether the process was 'undue' (I read the Rfcs and noticeboard and it was a fairly typical deliberation) -but more so the fact that they were applying standards to the ADL that could easily apply to the Gaza Health Ministry or Al Jazeera. My rule of thumb in these cases is to determine whether other reliable sources consider ADL reliable, and for the most part that seems to be the case.
@@themaskedman221 What we consider reliable or not is whether a source aligns with the concensus of reliable sources, and the ADL doesn’t meet this standard. Their positions, such as conflation of criticism of the state and antisemitism, is in complete misalignment with the scholarly consensus of either of these topics. The Gaza Health Ministry, even though they’re run by that one group, is reliable because any third-party sources who investigated them have consistently confirmed and found their numbers to be surprisingly accurate and uninflated.
Also, regarding ”biased editing”, it is not biased at all. Wikipedia is a summary of reliable secondary sources, not opinions. Just because these editors happen to make additions critical of a state doesn’t mean they or the sources are biased. Are we ”biased” for not adding any pro-Russia info in any Russia-Ukraine topic?
0:34 Unacknowledged conflict. Hillel is independent of ADL, but uses ADL's definition of what an antisemitic incident is. And ADL very recently broadened its definition of antisemitism to include anti-Zionist chants and slogans. That 700% increase could very well be explained entirely by that change, coupled with pro-Palestinian protests on campus.
But we shouldn’t listen to people when they say “Killing that many women and children really looks like genocidal practices,” right?
Like there’s no excuse for antisemitism. So this isn’t about Jewish people. This about THE STATE of Israel committing genocidal acts.
Netanyahu has spent his entire time in office trying to wrap Israel in the Torah so any criticism of the state somehow means you’re criticizing the religion.
He’s been trying to do the same thing with the Torah and himself too.
The entire Zionist project itself is antisemitic in that the goal of Christian’s is to create the rapture by returning Jews to Israel. The entire thing is insane. Netanyahu himself has even engaged in holocaust denial
It's actually more about "film students" who've all of a sudden become experts in international law and "genocide" by reading some things on the internet. There is an open case in an international court that will be deciding this question some time in the future. Based on the rulings so far, it is quite clear the case is far more complicated than people like you seem to believe.
@@themaskedman221 it’s pretty clear cut. If you’re murdering and killing as many women and children as the IDF have since the start of this leg of the conflict (meaning since Oct 7 since this issue goes back decades), you’re committing genocidal crimes.
Literally culling the birth givers and future of the people. That is textbook genocidal maneuvers.
Also “the masked man” my profile is over a decade old and you can’t change your @. So it’s graduated, working professional who is actually clued in.
Tell me, do you think what I said in my previous comment was antisemitic?
you are criticizing israel you are a anti semite
While the number of civilian casualties is high and horrible a number alone does not constitute grnocide (nor does the military occupation of the westbank constitues apartheid which is quite interesting given that Israel is the only state in that region in which arabs participate in a free democracy and don't have to suffer from muslim dictatorships). While the death toll still is horrible it is compared to other battles in urban areas lower than expected. The hamas caused this war and they are very happy that everyone now yells "Stop Israel" and now one cares about the ISIS-like organisation Hamas.
being Pro-Palestine, doesn't mean being anti-Semitic.
Of course not… but there definitely are a ton of antisemitic people who are also pro Palestine
ZERO PUSH BACK GREAT JOURNALISM
@marjoe32 After all this is the Morning Joe show, bottomline Joe Scarborough is an self proclaimed Zionist.
Don't say anything bad about Israel. UA-cam won't like it
@@travcat756 True
they delete your post
ADL = youtube. Same thing, same people, same cabal.
Why isnt wikipedia being asked to reply on air TOO???
Because Wiki editors are open source...
Because they use fake names and stay anonymous. There is nobody to appear on any tv program -one of the ringleaders of that Rfc was Iskandar 323. I mean, "he" was featured in news reports about the downgrade, but he is just a moniker and text on a screen.
Maybe the ADL could ask what Israel really wants. Where does Israel want her borders to be. Does she want peace with her neighbors or is she trying to take the whole region. The money spent, and lives lost is very expensive. That money could build a new canal from AQABA to the Mediterranean sea. From the river to the sea, two states, and very difficult to tunnel beneath a canal. But, are both sides tired of this constant killing?
The adl has done some good, but i am sorry to say that they have dug their own grave here. They have no one to blame but themselves.
What good have they done?
What? They have never done any "good" to anyone but themselves for the whole zog agenda!
Zog is not good.
Poor metaphor.
Amalek have a right of self defence!
You're not Amalek
@Rambo88568 Well according to Bibi the Gazans are.Regards Rambo!
We should listen to Palestinians & South Africans when they tell us what genocide & apartheid is.
Also there’s NEVER been corruption at an organization that has “quarterly board meetings” 😂😂😂🤡
Cry me a river adl
Why do ppl talk about free services like wiki, UA-cam, Twitter, etc., like they're institutions that owe them anything.
They're not free
They take your attention and time
They use this to profit with advertisers
The users make the platform profitable
Hey, MSNBC, tell me you don't know how wikipedia works without telling me how wikipedia works.
I edit on Wikipedia and know how it works. What's your issue?
Its not Antisemitism to call out Gews for what they do wrong.
I agree with Wikipedia... for once 🙄
I guess he's got a Wikipedia problem on top of a tik tok problem. Poor guy.
Thank you Wikepedia, there is no more room for propaganda.
🇮🇱 bots have flooded the comments section!
thanks for announcing your arrival. Lets stay away from you then.
@@adlisjsupremacy3318 SANCTION 🇮🇱
oi vey shut it down
No one's buying their victim card anymore. Own up and take some responsibility for your actions. NOTICE IT'S ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT. 🙄🤮
Anyone can become a Wikipedia editor. I have been. Just register to edit go to that offensive page and edit it to reflect the facts.
What have you edited?
Good for you the truth matters
You cant just edit anyone you like though. There are a lot of pro European activists that wikipedia, oy vey, permanently libels and lies about, and there nothing those people can do to change that.
Newcomers diving into a hotbutton topic like I/P (Israel/Palestine) are not apt to have a fun experience. It's like telling people "Anybody can play volleyball!" and sending them into a mine field to start a game...
Even the Bible talks about the ADL's awesome reliability.
Look it up.
We need PHDs who speak the truth and provide facts on the issues, like Dr. Norman Finkelstein, Dr. Rashid Khalidi, Dr Ilan Pappe, etc
Honestly who cares, groceries are expensive and I need to go to Costco today.
Ask your Jewish friends. I guarantee they care.
That's an easy $400.
Thank Joey from Scranton !!!
@@TheMacJew they care about food prices too. If you care about Jewish people you would dislike Biden. He has done the bare minimum to help and assist Israel.
This might draw attention to Wikipedia's practice of favouring liberal and left-wing sources over right-leaning and conservative sources. Russian, Chinese and Iranian state media like RT, CGTN and Press TV are also blacklisted.
When I hear the word 'reliability', my first thought is invariably 'ADL'
Stop the Lies! ⚠️🚫⚠️🚫⚠️🚫
Same old story at web publications like wikipedia, when they allow dis-info (deceptive information) and prop up mis-info (mistaken information).
Well, fortunately you won't be using it any more, so good for you.
The notion or "reliability" or "unreliability" of sources isn't a matter of something being "acceptable" or "banned." People can use ADL material all they want - although if it is being inserted in a tendentious manner about a controversial assertion regarding the Israel/Palestine situation and an editing arm-wrestling match follows, the ADL material is going to wind up on the cutting room floor. University press books and journal articles have the most clout; reportage from big news-gathering organizations like the New York Times nearly as much. Then we have smaller news organizations, with "unreliable" partisan material allowed the least clout.
This WP decision affects only ADL material related to I/P. If the ADL smears someone as "anti-Semitic" for opposition to Israeli policy in Gaza, for example, that is not going to have much traction if the assertion is challenged. This decision is narrowly focused on Israel/Palestine and came about only because ADL has devolved into advocacy.
Liberman: Netanyahu sent Mossad head, general to Qatar, ‘begged’ it to pay Hamas
Yisrael Beytenu party leader says the pair were sent by PM two weeks ago to convince Doha not to end its money transfers to the Gaza-based terror group
By TOI STAFF
22 February 2020, 9:46 pm
I get the ADL’s argument, but flagging advocacy groups as potentially misleading is the right idea
Whenever I get asked "Who do you believe more? Your own mother? Or the ADL?", I always say "ADL".
It's a no-brainer.
😅
Wikipedia can edit based in biases, another fake source.😆
Bingo!
Not 100 % reliable to be certain BUT wickepedia is a good startin point on research.
All this may be true but it's also true that antisemitism is on the rise...and that's a problem.
Source?
(ADL I bet)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Never be so lazy and complacent as to accept one source before you meditate upon the issue and think for yourselves. I'm for any watch dog group. After all, they should know. I trust the Southern Poverty Law Center, too. This organization was co-founded by the Great Julian Bond, civil rights activist, we don't talk about his contributions to the enforcement of civil rights legislation. What good is it if only stays on the "books" and there were no enforcement? "Faith without works is dead." This is activists on the part of information streaming, so definitely, they should be unbiased. Staying neutral. 😐 I don't agree with every position this group takes, but we have a 🧠 brain. Use it. Everyone must make up their own minds. At the end of the day, this is an attack against free speech. 💬 By "Wikipedia."
Everyone knows about Wikipedia being unreliable 😂
When Google asks for a donation I've always given one. No more.
Womp womp
Wikipedia is not a trusted source 😮
Neither is MSNBC
@@Dingleberry777 you mean fox news
@@MrScotttraynor No, he clearly said "MSDNC".
Derp
@@MrScotttraynor
Yeah pretty sure I said MSNBC there chum.
@@phokingdouscheFox News owes a billion dollars for getting the news wrong.
Sue them
Wikipedia has always been dead wrong on so many things.
Julian Massage, THERUMP, they love wakileak!
In my experience errors are rectified fairly promptly.
@alanwatterson2850 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Anyone criticizing the Biden administration is now "right wing". 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@djjones5715 Apart from his policy failure in Israel, that's obvious.
boycott wikipedia
It's not. It's clearly biased
Hahaha
I will stop using wikipedia effective NOW!
how nice for you
Wow, that hurts. Be sure you shut down your Alexa & Siri and don't use any AI products.
Lol
Wikipedia calling others unreliable is just😆😆😆
I was a monthly donor to Wikipedia until I realized they allow and protect activists writing their articles.
Jocelyn Nungaray...say her name because if you voted for biden, what happened to her is your fault.
ADL diddles little boys. I read it on wikipedia
That is hilarious Wikipeds claiming to be reliable in the first place. Ahahaaha!
Good for Wikipedia
When you digest news from a " tapeworm" expect a little discomfort. Oh and that's not spaghetti from last night 😅😅😅
Frozen Joe has got to GO!!!
TRUMP 2024!
don the con is way worse. watch any speech when hes off teleprompter sharks...
@@MrScotttraynor Nice attempt to put a spin on reality there, chief but putting Frozen Joe on the world stage more often lately to prove his cognizance has not gone as planned. You can't deny that...
Frozen? Oh right, the edited footage that left out Biden waiting for others to sit down first.