I’d like to clarify a couple of things for those who didn’t watch the video: 1) The divine mercy devotion is not currently banned. It was suppressed for almost 20 years from 1958 to 1978, since then it has not been under any sanction or suppression by the church and instead has been encouraged by the church’s authorities continuing to this day. 2) I am not in any way an opponent of the divine mercy devotion or of St Faustina’s writings, I frequently pray the chaplet of divine mercy and would encourage others to do the same. I apologize for putting redundant information in a pinned comment, but I was getting a little tired of people accusing me of lying about the church banning the devotion. If you don’t believe me, feel free to give it a google because it is not a disputed fact it was banned, the only disputed fact is why it was banned, hence the title of my video. Hope this clarification was helpful, and God bless.
Because of faulty translations from the original Polish, St. Faustina Kowalska's writings were considered doctrinally suspect, and so the Holy See suppressed the Divine Mercy devotion arising from those writings for about twenty years. Once the translations were corrected, the ban was lifted. The Chaplet of Divine Mercy is from God. Sr Faustina is a saint and has been canonized. Please read her diary. It has many quotes from Jesus. God is merciful and loving and wants all to go to heaven with Him. The evil one wants to mislead people away from God and will do anything to cause people not to believe in this beautiful devotion May God bless all humanity🙏🏼♥️📿
The image of the Divine Mercy, of Jesus without wounds and without the image of His sacred heart, with lights of ray from His chest, was banned too. Did they mistranslate the image?
Horsefeathers. Because Faustina and John Paul were both polish that's why it was pushed. There are many off things in this diary. She said Jesus dsaid she was a saint. NO SAINT WHILE LIVING.
@@sarihendershot3728 Her first vision of Jesus came when she was lamenting the fact they didn't have a Saint in her convent. The vision appears to her and tells her plainly "You are that Saint". It's 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 a little too convenient.
I am a possessed woman During my praying of the divine mercy the demons in my body would shout they dont like the prayer they are in pain just like when i pray the rosary 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 I know they are in pain because they would shout and In tremble in fear and get out So dont be afraid of praying it Let us all call on to jesus mercy
You should seek out the help of the local Bishop, who can delegate an exorcist to start liberating you from oppression. I will pray for you, be strong. The Saviour is with you, always.
Me too, I am undergoing through rough times. I'm currently possessed by demons. They don't like these prayers in particularly the Holy Rosary and especially the part of the Divine mercy chaplet, the last part, Holy God, Holy Mighty One, Holy Immortal One, Have mercy on us and on the whole world (3x) I will continue to trust my Lord Jesus ❤ Mama Mary, our Lady, our Queen.
Praying Divine mercy and confession has greatly increased my resilience against habitual harmful sins. I intend to keep going to fight all the demons until The Mercy of Jesus fills us and those around us so much it causes a tsunsmi of Mercy that wipes out sin and covers the whole world if it is God's will. Let it be done.
Pope John Paul 2 obeyed his advisers and disobeyed the Blessed Virgin Mary on the issue of the consecration of Russia. He could've made corrections in the Novus Ordo mass liturgy but did not. He could've brought back communion rails by an edict. This would've facilitated the practice of reception of communion on the tongue. The pope did not bother to do that. He also endorsed the introduction of altar girls at mass whereas altar boys were a preparation for a vocation to the priesthood. Then there was the fiasco of permitting worship from various religions at the Assisi shrine. The tabernacle was desecrated by Buddhists. The pope also watered down the canonisation process. Where was the heroic virtue in Pope John Paul 2? He has been subjected to a lot of whitewashing by his supporters. There are many in heaven but they do not get the honours of the altar. It's not necessary. Only very, very special souls should get that honour.
I completely disagree with your theories. For one St. John Paul ll did not have to name Russia by name, that Our Lady commanded it, is a lie. Sister Lucia corrected the conspiracy theorists in saying. "OUR LADY NEVER GAVE A FORMULA FOR THE CONSECRATION" where does this lie that Our Lady said the Pope must mention Russia by name come from?. Sister Lucia said that, "by the fact that Russia was explicitly implied. HEAVEN ACCEPTED IT."
@@JohnJones-qy5ko not the details of communion (in the hand vs on the tongue). Dogma isn’t the proper choice of words on my part, but papal infallibility applies when the pope, in consultation with the bishops, makes a formal statement. Pope John Paul II did not make any statements ex cathedra. At his 1994 declaration on the ordination of women to the priesthood did meet all the requirements for a dogmatic definition. An ex cathedra statement is a teaching made by a pope on a matter of faith or morals that is considered infallible. The phrase "ex cathedra" is Latin for "from the chair" and was originally used to describe decisions made by popes from their thrones. The last time a pope made an ex cathedra statement was in 1950, when Pope Pius XII defined the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Canonization doesn’t fall under dogma, and certainly the Divine Mercy devotion is itself most definitely not dogma. I would tend to agree with you that canonizations are led by the Holy Spirit though, therefore cannot be in error, but I’m not sure since they do not fall under ex cathedra statements.
I pray and recite The Chaplet Divine Mercy Novena every Good Friday for 9 days and it is a very powerful prayer. I had experienced miracles quite few times. And my sister in law prayers and my Novena at the same times when a tornado was coming directly to the property miracles happened, the house covered with a bright lights with like a rainbow , it was the bright lights Rays . I also saw the 2 Rays up in the sky .......✝️✝️✝️ When we pray the Chaplet of Divine Mercy we are saving soul, Jesus said. A very powerful prayer✝️🙏
Sister Faustina had severe psychological problems and a thirst for the grandeur. The early Church rightly condemned Sister and her diary. It wasn't until another Pole who incidentally became the Pope, that she regained traction and eventually was canonized. What else did this Pope do? Well he kissed a Quran, he worshiped with Jews, he totally submitted to Lutherans, he took away the requirements for Sainthood that had withstood centuries worth of scrutiny, he published the Code of Canon Law of 1983 which was a watered-down version of Canon Llaw of the earlier part of the century. And finally he added five more decades to our Mother's Holy Rosary who specifically mentioned 15 Decades of the Holy Rosary not 20. The bottom line, the Chaplet of the Divine Mercy is not of God but of a Great Deceiver. Protect yourself. Ave Maria!
Agreed. Catholics must be informed on these issues. Communion in the hand is a huge issue. The particles of Christ in the Eucharist falls and are possibly trampled on by parishioners. Most do not believe in The real presence in the Holy Eucharist.
You are right. There are theological errors in the diary. I did not know the details concerning Faustina and her writings and all the rest until it was pointed out and explained. I used to follow this devotion until I read about it. I have paused following it. The rosary is the way to go. I hope Faustina is in heaven, can never wish someone to be lost. But even priests and nuns can be deceived.
@@mts0628 agree 100%. JP II doesnt have faith. He is not catholic. He is surely in hell right now. Divine mercy is devil in the lamb’s clothing. If catholics want true devotion then it is the “Sacred Heart of Jesus”. No way sister faustina
Not really. The problems lie with the Chaplet of Divine Mercy itself. First, I will write about the theological issue. As priest Prof. Wincenty Granat wrote: "In the above prayer, there are essential theological errors: first, the Divinity of the Son is the same as that of God the Father, and therefore it cannot be offered to the Eternal Father; second, it is not permissible to offer the Divinity as a sacrifice in any form; third, it cannot be an atonement for sins, because the Divinity, and specifically God, forgives sins but is not a sacrificial atonement; it is in the human nature of the Savior that He is an atonement for our sins." Sister Faustina's chaplet contains three serious and fundamental errors, which are also interconnected: - the negation of the identity of the Divinity of the Son and the Father, - the blasphemous offering of the Divinity, - the blasphemous degradation of the Divinity to an atoning sacrifice for sins. And every Catholic will confirm that this is a theological contradiction. They must. Even a defender of the chaplet, such as priest Różycki, did not deny that "the Divinity cannot be offered to God the Father" (he tried to give a metaphorical context, defending the form, not the content). Interestingly, the original version of this chaplet, which Sister Faustina's earlier confessor, priest Józef Andrasz SJ, heard, did not contain words about offering the Divinity.
Intelligent and thorough explanation, thank you. The chaplet is a favourite prayer of mine, the accompanying meditations are absolutely in the Catholic spirit of praying for mercy for all.
I pray the Devine chaplet of Devine with Donna cori Gibson ( with the blood & water prayer),sometimes 10 or 12 times a day!! When I wake up at 3am, I pray it 3,4,5,times in a row,along with lots of hail Mary's!!!
JESUS DOES NOT LIE. WHATEVER HE TOLD ST. FAUSTINA COMES OUT OF A GOD MAN WHO IS ALL RIGHTEOUS AND CANNOT LIE. I BELIEVE JESUS. I DON'T BELIEVE MAN/CHURCH 100%, ALL THE TIME, BUT JESUS 120% OF THE TIME! PRAISE BE TO GOD!!! WHATEVER JESUS SAYS IS TRUTH, THE ONLY TRUTH.
It is not currently banned, but it was suppressed for about 20 years, as stated roughly 30 seconds into the video. I am a supporter and defender of the Divine mercy chaplet.
The CHURCH; the Roman Catholic Church instated divine mercy Sunday and certainly did NOT ban it, the nun who received the Divine Mercy messages is a Catholic Saint and this video is misleading. The crowning achievement of Saint Pope John Paul II is this devotion!
I agree that the divine mercy devotion was one of St Pope John Paul II’s crowning achievements. It was thanks to his efforts that the faulty translations were corrected, and the ban on divine mercy was lifted by Paul VI. I would encourage everyone to incorporate the divine mercy chaplet into their spiritual life!
the holy office is the keeper of orthodoxy. since revelation ended with the death of john the apostle, apparitions or messages of whatever nature must be suppressed until it satisfies rome. if the message or apparition is contrary to doctrine or against the magisterium of the church, then it is not from God, it is that simple
There are a ton of problems .. here is a nugget, the Lord calls those who love him brothers and sisters, but refers to us as creatures in her writings? The whole thing has the same flair as Maria Valtorta .. it completely re interprets the Catholic doctrine of salvation. I stay far away from it ..
But aren’t we creatures? a “creature” is simply one who has been created, and we were created in Gods image and likeness. If you don’t find it spiritually fruitful then by all means stick to other devotions, but this particular objection doesn’t sound quite right to me. God bless you brother!
It is approved by the Catholic church. Yes, Maria Valtorta is fake. But this one is approved, after long deliberation. Don't go making up your own church.
I think this video is confusing by its title. as far as I know, the church has not come out and band Divine Mercy devotion. I’m getting really tired of all of these people making things more confusing. I think you intended to clear things up, but I think too many of us don’t watch the whole video at the statement on the front of the video. There’s a lot going on in the world today and we don’t have time to focus on things that are confusing. Simply state that we are able to participate in divine Mercy devotion. It took many years to get it going at my church, but thankfully, there are people that are participating in it to some degree. Too many people out there still don’t know how important divine mercy Sunday I wish people would focus on that more. It’s pretty darn powerful and I wish more people knew about it.
Toward the end of your video you make the comment twice : WE ARE ALL DEPRAVED. I'll challenge you on that. You sound like John Calvin. Better to say WE ARE ALL WEAKENED, AND HAVE A FALEN NATURE DUE TO ORIGINAL SIN. DEPRAVED means "totally useless/corrupt. The Orthodox have a good view of our fallen nature: THOUGH WE ARE IN A FALLEN STATE, GOD'S DIVINE SPARK IN US IS ALWAYS, IN SOME WAY, ALWAYS AFLAME.
This is a good clarification, obviously I was not trying to express the Calvinist notion of total human depravity but rather to express the immense gravity of our sins and therefore the infinite mercy and kindness of God that overcomes even the worst of our sins to make us actually righteous as opposed to Calvin who believed that humans are so rotten that Gods mercy could never actually sanctify us and that it’s really just a coating that makes us seem righteous. I definitely could have worded it better so I appreciate you helping to clarify the true Catholic teaching!
There are many ancient and modern devotions to, for example, The Sacred Heart of Jesus, and a wealth more that are not in question. We must discern to receive guidance regarding where we enter devotion.
It took a long time to make Saint Sister Margaret Mary a Saint, like at least 300 years. Those who commit calumny against St. Faustina ought to find out about Sister Margaret Mary.
The problems lie with the Chaplet of Divine Mercy itself. First, I will write about the theological issue. As priest Prof. Wincenty Granat wrote: "In the above prayer, there are essential theological errors: first, the Divinity of the Son is the same as that of God the Father, and therefore it cannot be offered to the Eternal Father; second, it is not permissible to offer the Divinity as a sacrifice in any form; third, it cannot be an atonement for sins, because the Divinity, and specifically God, forgives sins but is not a sacrificial atonement; it is in the human nature of the Savior that He is an atonement for our sins." Sister Faustina's chaplet contains three serious and fundamental errors, which are also interconnected: - the negation of the identity of the Divinity of the Son and the Father, - the blasphemous offering of the Divinity, - the blasphemous degradation of the Divinity to an atoning sacrifice for sins. And every Catholic will confirm that this is a theological contradiction. They must. Even a defender of the chaplet, such as priest Różycki, did not deny that "the Divinity cannot be offered to God the Father" (he tried to give a metaphorical context, defending the form, not the content). Interestingly, the original version of this chaplet, which Sister Faustina's earlier confessor, priest Józef Andrasz SJ, heard, did not contain words about offering the Divinity.
I've NEVER been drawn to that chaplet. Her diary is totally wacka-doodle. Sacred Heart of Jesus chaplet, the trad rosary as reitered by the Blessed Mother at Fatima [NO, NO, NO luminous mysteries!], Holy Face of Jesus chaplet, and St. Michael Chaplet. Those cover 100%.
@@user-zo2ge3oe8d So your plan is to "look the other way"? V2 has created a counterfeit church full of endless scandals and abuses. By their fruits....
Wow. This presentation was awesome. Very insightful, well thought-out, precise, spiritual in the best sense of the word and thorough. New sub here. Keep up the good good work! 👌🥰
It's incredibly unlikely the Church put a living person's unpublished private diary she was currently writting in on the index. Sedes need a reality check, it doesn't even make reasonable sense.
You are not a theologian!! We must obey the church!! To disobey causes devision!! Jesus christ said he wants unity in his church!! Go to God for answers and don't be apart of deciding the church!!
Other than the Holy Bible, the Divine Mercy Diary written by St. Maria Faustina Kowalska is the most important book ever written. Please read the Divine Mercy Diary.
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide Interesting discussion. As someone who tries to say the devotion daily, I confess I've always felt vaguely put off by the prayers attached( start and finish, novena) to it. Even as someone devoted to St Therese of Lisieux, I find them as something more "emotional female" than divinely inspired. I don't find anything heretical in them, so am fine saying them. But I appreciated your discourse on them. Btw not suggesting she isn't a legitimate saint either. Just something Im missing. I can understand (absent the conspiracy theories) why some question.
There is a difference in thepu😢m I Church between banning and suppression. The Church is always, always, always always the arbitror of any private devotion, as to whether it worthy of belief or not. That takes time.
09:52, Col.1:24: YES, Christ's sufferings are lacking something, much pertaining to this video. They are lacking our repentance and the crucifixion of our flesh/will in order to be applied to our souls! "...I offer Thy Majesty all the works I shall ever do, steeping them in the Blood of Jesus, my Redeamer..." -part of a prayer to be said every day from the book "The Great Means of Salvation and Perfection" by St. Alphonsus
The Divine Mercy in its' essence offers prayers to The Blessed Mother and call for penance and The Holy Rosary. That in itself is good. Believing the seer is another issue. The Divine Mercy should not replace The Most Sacred Heart of Jesus Devotions. The Catholic Church is in a crisis now. Catholics need to be educated on what they are doing. Would a Catholic participate in The adoration of The Pachamama? Kiss the Koran? pray before statues of the heretic Martin Luther? and other heresies? Take heed on what you do and do not do. Most Catholics are ignorant on these issues. Study them~
11:01 I think you just did what you were saying not to do with others writings...interpret in the most uncharitable way possible. Constant penance can and should be performed even on feast days and times of not fasting. Although you tried to address this, I question this work mainly because it has been presented as mercy without the normal conditions. Scripture, Church Fathers, Church teachings, and writings of the Saints have written extensively on in order to obtain mercy (in the form of forgiveness of sins) from God we need to do something (with God's grace) such as Fear the Lord, have true repentance, forgive others as God forgives us. People who follow the divine mercy have trouble believing that anyone goes to hell because, as they say, God is all mercy. But our Faith tells us repeatedly that God is also all just and that every sin must be punished and every unrepentant sinner who dies must be punished for eternity. To gain access to his mercy He requires us (with the help of His Grace) to do certain things...and then He restores innocence to sinners' (Holy Saturday Mass reading). For things like the brown scapular that is all there. First there are conditions and more to the promise but it has been abbreviated to a prayer on a is literal 2 sq-in cloth! The flip side of the brown scapular promise is that you probably will not die with the scapular on if you are not doing those things. Even if there were not other conditions (which there are) there is little to hope for to someone trying to manipulate the gift giver! I don't think it is the right thing to talk about God speaking hyperbolically because that is to exceed the realms of truth. In scripture an alternative explanation to what may seem hyperbolic is to properly understand the context of what is being said.
I believe that the divine mercy chaplet was probably given by the holy spirit to Saint frostina. But I find it hard to Believe some of the stuff in that diary. I love the divine mercy chaple it. And I have said it many times and received graces from it. But I can't honestly say that. I believe everything that is in that diary. Another thing I would appreciate you checking on. Is something that bothers me a lot. And that is, why do we call the mass a sacrifice? Why do we just not call it? A remembrance of the sacrifice of Christ. What exactly are we sacrificing on the altar? I have asked this question many times and never received an answer from priest. Jesus said do this in memory of me. Why do we just not say the celebration of the mass? The remembrance of the sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ. But that is not what we say. We we say, may the Lord accept our sacrifice. What are we sacrificing?
Thank you so much for your comment, I’m sorry that no priest has been able to answer this question for you because it is such an essential part of the nature of the priesthood. A detailed explanation may be found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church in paragraphs 1362-1372, which is available for free online. But to answer your question briefly here: the sacrificial offering at the mass is actually Christ. We believe that the mass is the re-presentation of Christ’s crucifixion. Which is to say that Christ’s death on the cross is made present at that time and place when the priest says the words of consecration, so at the mass, we not only remember Christ’s death, we actually witness it as well. As CCC 1367 puts it: “1367 The sacrifice of Christ and the sacrifice of the Eucharist are one single sacrifice: "The victim is one and the same: the same now offers through the ministry of priests, who then offered himself on the cross; only the manner of offering is different." "And since in this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the Mass, the same Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross is contained and is offered in an unbloody manner. . . this sacrifice is truly propitiatory."” I hope this clarifies things for you, let me know if you have any other questions!
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide I thank you very much. And I appreciate you responding to my comment and trying to explain the sacrifice of the mass. But I still have questions because when you say unbloody sacrifice. I always believe that there is no sacrifice without blood. So how can you have an unbloody sacrifice? This ISIS why the protestants say that we are sacrificing Christ. Every time we say the Mand if that is true then it's not good when Jesus instituted this sacrament. Of the Holy eucharit was in the upper room and it was before he was sacrificed. Once he was sacrifice, he said it is finished. So I still have many doubts about that word sacrifice. I even find it hard to say at mass. I I truly feel Bad in my heart when I say that word sacrifice sacrifice.I believe so much in the sacrifice of christ I .feel I am at the foot of the cross all day long
@@suzieroberts2203 thank you so much for following up! It’s very understandable that you’d have some confusion about the “unbloody form” of the mass because it can be a bit confusing if you don’t understand the Aristotelian categories the church is using here. To put it simply, when we say that the mass is presented in an unbloody form we don’t mean that the mass has no blood or isn’t a bloody sacrifice, when the priest says “this is my body” and “this is my blood” Jesus’s body and blood actually become present and so the when priest is holding the chalice, it’s not filled with wine, it’s filled with the precious blood of Christ shed for our sins, but still retains the “accidents” (taste, smell, color, etc) and the “form” (shape and structure) of wine, but the “substance” (the thing that it is) has become blood. And it’s a similar situation with the mass as a whole, where the substance of the mass is the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross which is of course a bloody sacrifice, but the accidents and form of the mass are not bloody. So it’s a bloody sacrifice in an unbloody form. It is so wonderful to hear that you have such a deep faith and care for the sacrifice of Christ, but of course don’t forget to focus on his triumphant resurrection as well! The fast and the feast! Please don’t hesitate to follow up if i wasn’t clear enough or you have additional questions, God bless you!
I don’t like this video. The Catholic Church approves of Divine Mercy Sunday and the Divine Mercy and forgiveness of corporal punishment that we can receive on that day. Gods mercy is poured forth for us on that day. Your arguments are a waste of time. Have faith in the holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church’s teachings.
The Divine Mercy Picture has bled And oil marks comes on the image when we gather in prayer and praise and worship God for his mercy . This guy has no God experience and so his talk is empty .
You need to make sure that you are not confusing Maria divine mercy the false prophet. You definitely need to change the cover picture of your video because it is misleading and you don’t want to be held accountable for that.!!!! While the appearances to St Faustian and the Chaplet of the divine mercy is the true appearances and massages and the divine mercy Chaplet is true devotion and it is very important to these times that we are leaving at because before God’s Justice there is God’s mercy which is represented in Confession because whomever doesn’t pass through God’s mercy he or she will have to pass through His justice and that’s what the Lord said to St Faustina.
LISTEN PEOPLE, THE CHAPLET OF DIVINE MERCY, WAS GIVEN TO ST. FAUSTINA BY OUR LORD JESUS HIMSELF. A PHOTO OF HIMSELF WITH THE CHAPLET OF DIVINE MERCY HE TOLD HER CHAPLET MUST BE SAID AT 3:PM
The CHAPLET OV DIVINE MERCY WAS GIVEN TO ST. FAUSTINA BY OUR LORD JESUS HIMSELF, IN 1938 OR MAYBE A LITTLE BEFORE. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT, UNTIL ST.FAUSTINA INFORMED THEM TELLING HOW OUR LORD VISITED HER GAVE HER THE CHAPLET ALONG WITH A SELF PHOTO OF HIS TRUE SELF, AND THE CHAPLET SHOULD BE SAID AT 3:PM EVERYDAY IN MEMORY OF HIS PASSION ON GOOD FRIDAY. AMEN
Were you there? The devil can do great miracles, the great deceiver.I stick to the ancient Faith of my forebearers who have always trusted in Divine Mercy.
Our Lord is outside of time and her Sainthood is ever present to Jesus. Jesus is only saying that she will not go to purgatory which is a Divine Judgment. Why can’t theologians see the obvious. Some within the Church are evil in so many ways.
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide well, all of this - Church Reasons to Condemn the Divine Mercy Devotion by Msgr. Patrick Perez. You quoted from it - partially. That's called taking it out of context.
@@andrewdaniels9698 no, that’s called a citation, it’s not taking it out of context unless I misrepresent what is being said or the omitted portions of the text would change the meaning of the cited portion. By this logic Fr Perez would also be taking St Faustina’s diary out of context simply because he does not include the full text of the diary in his article. So what portion of the article did I omit which was important context for understanding the portions I cited?
@@petercole5858 John Paul also worshipped with Heretics an pagans, placed Buddha on the altar and did quite a few questionable things. Just because someone is canonized doesn't mean we have to believe it. If Faustina had not been from Woytila's homeland she would have been just one among many unknown nuns, definitely suppressed.
I wold love to see a defence video like this one on the pentelcostal heretical "charismatic renewal" movement and it's practices like the baptism in the holy spirit.
Don't trust this kid. Trust Christ and His Church. Keep in mind, the Novus Ordo is just that. A New Order of things. The post-concilliar "Church". The "Church" of the New Advent. The "Church" of the New Pentecost. The names are monicers that they use to describe themselves. They are not my words.
Blessed Mary is in heaven and Devine!! St.faustina was a mortal !! There is no contradiction!! Jesus christ said He United himself with a Moral creature!! Again blessed Mary is in heaven and not mortal anymore!!
This devotion was condemned twice, the strongest condemnation by Cardinal Ottaviani in 1959 who was the head of the Holy Office. There is a document with this condemnation, but I wasn’t able to download it. It was placed on the Index of Forbidden Books, do better research and you will find it. The argument for those who have a cult like attachment to this devotion always refer to the lack of accurate translation from Polish, what a bunch of nonsense. This is a modernist ploy to try to validate the validity this terrible devotion. You don’t need more than good catechesis to see the errors in her writings. There are a couple of gentlemen who have done great research into Faustina and they totally destroy any credence to her writings. You mock the true devotion by Our Lady by diminishing their importance to the salvation of souls. The children of Fatima did tremendous penance especially little Jacinta. You can see the lives of some of the saints who did daily penance for the salvation of souls. All grace necessary for salvation comes through Our Lady, if you leave her out of the equation you cannot save your soul.
@@roexvt630 What am I reading wrong? You literally said that grace from God alone won't save you - "All grace necessary for salvation comes through Our Lady." Does that coincide with the scriptures? Are you familiar with the scriptures?
Another popesplainer justifying the obvious heresies in the Diary. Why does the image of Jesus in the divine mercy painting lack the wounds in His hands? That alone shows that this devotion should not have been approved.
This strikes me as a very silly objection, A simple explanation for why the divine mercy image lacks the wounds of the cross is because it is a depiction of Jesus prior to the crucifixion. The church has routinely depicted Jesus without wounds for centuries. For example, manger scenes also depict Jesus without wounds, should they be condemned as well?
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide Yes a very simple explanation for simple minds. Read your Gospel and see that Jesus told everyone not to tell about His miracles until AFTER His resurrection. Jesus did not want to be known outside of His suffering, death and Resurrection. Jesus's wounds are His GLORY! Read what St. Paul said: "For I judged not myself to know anything among you, but Jesus Christ, and him CRUCIFIED." 1 Cor 2:2 I also noticed that your explanation of the heresies in the Divine Mercy are basically attacks on other approved apparitions. As if to say, if you believe in this approved apparition, then you have to believe in the Divine Mercy because they are both essentially heretical. Shame on you.
@@ChristopherMarlowe yesterday I was praying the rosary at St Peter’s and I noticed a mosaic of Jesus appearing to St margarita maria alacoque, and I noticed that in that image, Jesus was also depicted without wounds. The mosaic was made in 1925 under the reign of St Pope Pius XI, so I guess he’s a modernist heretic too right? Or maybe it’s something totally normal that the church has done for over a century; there is nothing wrong with depicting Jesus without wounds, if you were correct that Jesus never wanted to be to be known other than for His suffering, Death, and resurrection, then we could never depict Jesus’ birth, or ministry. As Catholics, we do not just focus on his death and resurrection (even though it’s most important) but His entire LIFE, death, and resurrection. As for my other arguments, I’m not attacking other approved apparitions, I simply explain a simple interpretation of St Faustina’s words which would be in line with the Church’s teachings, and point out that if you insist on the most uncharitable interpretation of almost any saint’s words, you will find heresy everywhere, it is not reasonable to give St Simon Stock, and blessed Alan De Rupe the benefit of the doubt when they claim to have heard promises that could be interpreted in a heretical way, whilst refusing to do so for St Faustina, your holding her work to a different standard, and it is not reasonable to do so. Peace be to you.
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide It's funny that the scandalous Cardinal in charge of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith takes the same tack as you do. The Vatican was popesplaining some new confusing attitude towards the obviously heretical Medjugorgie apparitions, and did so by questioning previous apparitions. You can see that he doesn't have the Faith because he doesn't try to justify what he is doing on its own merits, but rather attacks other articles of faith. No one can justify Medjugorgie's heretical statements that supposedly came from the Blessed Mother, and no one can justify the heresies in Faustina's diary. So they popesplain them away by attacking other Catholic things. I can't speak to the mosaic you are referring to, but I know that Pope Pius X condemned modernism in 1907, so the modernists were already well established at that point. The point that you are missing about Jesus' suffering and death is that afterwards he entered into His Glory. He only revealed His Glory to Peter, James and John on Mount Tabor. But notice that He told them: "Tell the vision to no man, till the Son of man be risen from the dead." He did not want His Glory revealed outside of His suffering, death and Resurrection. The MODERNIST trend is to have the Christ with no wounds. It is the happy Christ that forgives everything. There is no penance and no fasting. It is Christ without the Cross. It is not I who insist on the most uncharitable interpretation of Faustina's Diary, it is the Church. Her Diary was thrice condemned by the holy office, and then brought back by the Polish Pope. The excuse was that it was a "bad translation" but the current translation is still heretical. The only change is the the Vatican is being run by modernist heretics. There is much, much more to condemn the Faustina Diary. If you are curious, go to the Ascent of Mount Carmel channel. He has MANY videos on the divine mercy devotion: ua-cam.com/video/yI5_4Pi0e8w/v-deo.html
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide I should also add that the painting of the divine mercy was approved by Faustina who selected the artist and dictated how it should look. The mural you mentioned is by an artist commissioned by the Vatican, who was completely removed from St. Margaret Mary Alocoque. So you are comparing apples and oranges, like your buddy Tucho Fernandez.
@cipriano yo estoy completamente de acuerdo con Ud En mi opinión humilde y de pecador , todos los papas, excepto por el papa Benedicto XVI que trató de concervar la MISSA TRIDENTINA , NO son válidos para nada 😢🎉
@JoyToTheWorld-v2f i totally agree with you that as time progress there were many changes in the church. But These actions are unacceptable: 1. Changing the mass into protestant inspired novus ordo which clearly violated the Quo Primim of Pius V in 1570 that no man or no pope can change the mass until forever 2. “Pope” JPII kissing the koran which clearly denies the Divinity of Jesus Christ 3. False Ecumenism 4. Humanist Religion as taught by JP II that man is the way, man is the truth & man is the life 5. Europe is back to paganism 6. Bergoglio is worshipping pagan gods like pachamama 7. Cardinal bergoglio allows his cathedral to be used for jewish worship 8. many sexual abuses from clergies 9. Interfaith prayer with other pagan religions organized by jp II in assisi. This is blasphemous act. And many many more heritic teaching in vatican II religion
Catholics best not speak I'll of the elected Pontiff regardless of how they perceive him. Jesus said to his Disciples, 'Anyone who listens to you listens to me; and anyone who rejects you rejects me, and those who reject me reject the one who sent me. Luke 10: 16 so the pope, Bishop's etc. are still the one's who have apostolic succession, we need to respect and pray for them, to be guided by the Holy Spirit, and lead the Church through these extraordinary time's. If we don't support them with our prayers, then we can't criticize, it's like being critical of a senior family member, instead of supporting them. Prayer can move mountains. 🙏🙏🙏 Jesus said Love one another as I have loved thee. ✝️
@@arnoeeuwigheid4499I am very catholic because i believe all the Catholic Doctrines which is taught by the founder Jesus Christ to His Apostles and handed down the Sacred Scripture & traditon to the Church Fathers, to the Popes (until Pius XII who died in 1958), to all faithful Bishops & Priest who is validly ordained and preach the true Catholic Faith until today!
There is no salvation outside the catholich church. But true traditional catholic church. NOT vatican II church with Francis Bergoglio Who is not even valid priest
I’d like to clarify a couple of things for those who didn’t watch the video:
1) The divine mercy devotion is not currently banned. It was suppressed for almost 20 years from 1958 to 1978, since then it has not been under any sanction or suppression by the church and instead has been encouraged by the church’s authorities continuing to this day.
2) I am not in any way an opponent of the divine mercy devotion or of St Faustina’s writings, I frequently pray the chaplet of divine mercy and would encourage others to do the same.
I apologize for putting redundant information in a pinned comment, but I was getting a little tired of people accusing me of lying about the church banning the devotion. If you don’t believe me, feel free to give it a google because it is not a disputed fact it was banned, the only disputed fact is why it was banned, hence the title of my video.
Hope this clarification was helpful, and God bless.
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide Finally!!! Thank you for having the DECENCY to write this additional comment!!!!🙏💒🇳🇱
But the title is at least misleading. Why don't you rephrase to say, "Why did the Church ban the Divine Mercy Devotion from 1958 to 1978?"
Brother, please update the title of this video by adding "from 1958-1978" to avoid confusion or misleading to other people. Thank you.
🎉why not choose d true devotion w.o controversy.?
Beware of antikrist manipulating d popes n side vatican. They wage war against holy saints.. faustina didnt talk about this.see d vicar now.
Because of faulty translations from the original Polish, St. Faustina Kowalska's writings were considered doctrinally suspect, and so the Holy See suppressed the Divine Mercy devotion arising from those writings for about twenty years. Once the translations were corrected, the ban was lifted.
The Chaplet of Divine Mercy is from God.
Sr Faustina is a saint and has been canonized.
Please read her diary. It has many quotes from Jesus. God is merciful and loving and wants all to go to heaven with Him.
The evil one wants to mislead people away from God and will do anything to cause people not to believe in this beautiful devotion
May God bless all humanity🙏🏼♥️📿
I seek a passage from her diary after meditating on daily scripture readings, which has greatly enhanced spiritual growth.
I saw a few videos portraying sr faustina as being higher than the Blessed Mary herself as such are advising people to not be deceived.
The image of the Divine Mercy, of Jesus without wounds and without the image of His sacred heart, with lights of ray from His chest, was banned too. Did they mistranslate the image?
Horsefeathers. Because Faustina and John Paul were both polish that's why it was pushed. There are many off things in this diary. She said Jesus dsaid she was a saint. NO SAINT WHILE LIVING.
@@sarihendershot3728 Her first vision of Jesus came when she was lamenting the fact they didn't have a Saint in her convent. The vision appears to her and tells her plainly "You are that Saint". It's 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 a little too convenient.
I have prayed the chaplet of Devine Mercy for a couple of years now and am greatly blessed by it.
Devotions are not supposed to be "rewarding" materially! They are for penance ~
@@richardimon468 And thats exacltly how I use them.
Then please spell it correctly.
I am a possessed woman
During my praying of the divine mercy the demons in my body would shout they dont like the prayer they are in pain just like when i pray the rosary 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
I know they are in pain because they would shout and In tremble in fear and get out
So dont be afraid of praying it
Let us all call on to jesus mercy
You should seek out the help of the local Bishop, who can delegate an exorcist to start liberating you from oppression. I will pray for you, be strong. The Saviour is with you, always.
Me too, I am undergoing through rough times. I'm currently possessed by demons. They don't like these prayers in particularly the Holy Rosary and especially the part of the Divine mercy chaplet, the last part,
Holy God,
Holy Mighty One,
Holy Immortal One,
Have mercy on us and on the whole world (3x)
I will continue to trust my Lord Jesus ❤ Mama Mary, our Lady, our Queen.
So did they get out?
@@estherbelleza7125 You are saying the prayers, but you are still possessed? It seems the rosary and the chaplet may not be effective.
Praying Divine mercy and confession has greatly increased my resilience against habitual harmful sins.
I intend to keep going to fight all the demons until The Mercy of Jesus fills us and those around us so much it causes a tsunsmi of Mercy that wipes out sin and covers the whole world if it is God's will.
Let it be done.
Pope John Paul 2 obeyed his advisers and disobeyed the Blessed Virgin Mary on the issue of the consecration of Russia.
He could've made corrections in the Novus Ordo mass liturgy but did not. He could've brought back communion rails by an edict. This would've facilitated the practice of reception of communion on the tongue. The pope did not bother to do that. He also endorsed the introduction of altar girls at mass whereas altar boys were a preparation for a vocation to the priesthood.
Then there was the fiasco of permitting worship from various religions at the Assisi shrine. The tabernacle was desecrated by Buddhists.
The pope also watered down the canonisation process.
Where was the heroic virtue in Pope John Paul 2?
He has been subjected to a lot of whitewashing by his supporters.
There are many in heaven but they do not get the honours of the altar. It's not necessary. Only very, very special souls should get that honour.
I completely disagree with your theories. For one St. John Paul ll did not have to name Russia by name, that Our Lady commanded it, is a lie. Sister Lucia corrected the conspiracy theorists in saying. "OUR LADY NEVER GAVE A FORMULA FOR THE CONSECRATION" where does this lie that Our Lady said the Pope must mention Russia by name come from?. Sister Lucia said that, "by the fact that Russia was explicitly implied. HEAVEN ACCEPTED IT."
So much for papal infallibility, huh?
@@JohnJones-qy5kopapal infallibility doesn’t apply to those situations. Only dogma.
@@GymGuy817JasonEuless Communion and cannonization aren't dogma?
@@JohnJones-qy5ko not the details of communion (in the hand vs on the tongue). Dogma isn’t the proper choice of words on my part, but papal infallibility applies when the pope, in consultation with the bishops, makes a formal statement. Pope John Paul II did not make any statements ex cathedra. At his 1994 declaration on the ordination of women to the priesthood did meet all the requirements for a dogmatic definition.
An ex cathedra statement is a teaching made by a pope on a matter of faith or morals that is considered infallible. The phrase "ex cathedra" is Latin for "from the chair" and was originally used to describe decisions made by popes from their thrones.
The last time a pope made an ex cathedra statement was in 1950, when Pope Pius XII defined the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
Canonization doesn’t fall under dogma, and certainly the Divine Mercy devotion is itself most definitely not dogma. I would tend to agree with you that canonizations are led by the Holy Spirit though, therefore cannot be in error, but I’m not sure since they do not fall under ex cathedra statements.
I didn't hear or read that it has been banned. I still pray to St. Faustina on a regular basis
❤❤❤❤❤ Love St Faustina
Very well said. Thank you for that defense of Divine Mercy. God bless your mission
I pray and recite The Chaplet Divine Mercy Novena every Good Friday for 9 days and it is a very powerful prayer. I had experienced miracles quite few times. And my sister in law prayers and my Novena at the same times when a tornado was coming directly to the property miracles happened, the house covered with a bright lights with like a rainbow , it was the bright lights Rays . I also saw the 2 Rays up in the sky .......✝️✝️✝️
When we pray the Chaplet of Divine Mercy we are saving soul, Jesus said. A very powerful prayer✝️🙏
When did Jesus ever mention the Chaplet of Divine Mercy?
Thanks for your explanation. Very clear. God bless you!
Sister Faustina had severe psychological problems and a thirst for the grandeur.
The early Church rightly condemned Sister and her diary. It wasn't until another Pole who incidentally became the Pope, that she regained traction and eventually was canonized. What else did this Pope do? Well he kissed a Quran, he worshiped with Jews, he totally submitted to Lutherans, he took away the requirements for Sainthood that had withstood centuries worth of scrutiny, he published the Code of Canon Law of 1983 which was a watered-down version of Canon Llaw of the earlier part of the century. And finally he added five more decades to our Mother's Holy Rosary who specifically mentioned 15 Decades of the Holy Rosary not 20.
The bottom line, the Chaplet of the Divine Mercy is not of God but of a Great Deceiver. Protect yourself. Ave Maria!
Agreed. Catholics must be informed on these issues. Communion in the hand is a huge issue. The particles of Christ in the Eucharist falls and are possibly trampled on by parishioners. Most do not believe in The real presence in the Holy Eucharist.
You are right. There are theological errors in the diary. I did not know the details concerning Faustina and her writings and all the rest until it was pointed out and explained. I used to follow this devotion until I read about it. I have paused following it. The rosary is the way to go. I hope Faustina is in heaven, can never wish someone to be lost. But even priests and nuns can be deceived.
@@mts0628 agree 100%. JP II doesnt have faith. He is not catholic. He is surely in hell right now. Divine mercy is devil in the lamb’s clothing. If catholics want true devotion then it is the “Sacred Heart of Jesus”. No way sister faustina
The diary contains statements that are false and also heretical. That Pope JPII pushed for it's approval is a disgrace
what is wrong with the devotion
Thank you for this video it has helped me and you explained about this caplet which is a favorite of mine God bless you
Not really.
The problems lie with the Chaplet of Divine Mercy itself. First, I will write about the theological issue. As priest Prof. Wincenty Granat wrote:
"In the above prayer, there are essential theological errors: first, the Divinity of the Son is the same as that of God the Father, and therefore it cannot be offered to the Eternal Father; second, it is not permissible to offer the Divinity as a sacrifice in any form; third, it cannot be an atonement for sins, because the Divinity, and specifically God, forgives sins but is not a sacrificial atonement; it is in the human nature of the Savior that He is an atonement for our sins."
Sister Faustina's chaplet contains three serious and fundamental errors, which are also interconnected:
- the negation of the identity of the Divinity of the Son and the Father,
- the blasphemous offering of the Divinity,
- the blasphemous degradation of the Divinity to an atoning sacrifice for sins.
And every Catholic will confirm that this is a theological contradiction. They must. Even a defender of the chaplet, such as priest Różycki, did not deny that "the Divinity cannot be offered to God the Father" (he tried to give a metaphorical context, defending the form, not the content).
Interestingly, the original version of this chaplet, which Sister Faustina's earlier confessor, priest Józef Andrasz SJ, heard, did not contain words about offering the Divinity.
It WAS banned, but RESTORED!! And you KNOW it!
Please CHANGE the INCOMPLETE TITLE of your video!!!!
I guess that you pray with The Holy Father in adoration of The Pachamama as well?
@@richardimon468 Another hater ?
Did you even watch the video?
@@3ggshe11s It's about that disgusting CLICK BAIT!!!
@@3ggshe11s The owner had the decency to finally EXPLAIN himself.👍
Intelligent and thorough explanation, thank you. The chaplet is a favourite prayer of mine, the accompanying meditations are absolutely in the Catholic spirit of praying for mercy for all.
I pray the Devine chaplet of Devine with Donna cori Gibson ( with the blood & water prayer),sometimes 10 or 12 times a day!! When I wake up at 3am, I pray it 3,4,5,times in a row,along with lots of hail Mary's!!!
Great reflections!
JESUS DOES NOT LIE. WHATEVER HE TOLD ST. FAUSTINA COMES OUT OF A GOD MAN WHO IS ALL RIGHTEOUS AND CANNOT LIE. I BELIEVE JESUS. I DON'T BELIEVE MAN/CHURCH 100%, ALL THE TIME, BUT JESUS 120% OF THE TIME! PRAISE BE TO GOD!!! WHATEVER JESUS SAYS IS TRUTH, THE ONLY TRUTH.
The thing is there are false apparitions.
@@anacardoso9822I get that. But St. Faustina IS an approved apparition though....
@@lukasandisaaktime9147 By the Vatican 2 sect, which also elevated to Sainthood Status total apostates like Mother Theresa.
@@lukasandisaaktime9147 But it was banned by two previous Popes.
@@lukasandisaaktime9147 Who can approve an apparition? This is occult stuff!
Not true it is not banned we pray the Divine Mercy at 3:00 pm. The devil hates it and afraid of it.
It is not currently banned, but it was suppressed for about 20 years, as stated roughly 30 seconds into the video. I am a supporter and defender of the Divine mercy chaplet.
The CHURCH; the Roman Catholic Church instated divine mercy Sunday and certainly did NOT ban it, the nun who received the Divine Mercy messages is a Catholic Saint and this video is misleading. The crowning achievement of Saint Pope John Paul II is this devotion!
I agree that the divine mercy devotion was one of St Pope John Paul II’s crowning achievements. It was thanks to his efforts that the faulty translations were corrected, and the ban on divine mercy was lifted by Paul VI. I would encourage everyone to incorporate the divine mercy chaplet into their spiritual life!
Absolutely true!!!
Thank you for your post!!
Agree 💯
John Paul II is definitely NOT a SAINT! He is anti Pope & not valid pope
John Paul II is NOT a saint. He is in hell right now for the sins he is committed. Vatican II is not Catholic Church
the holy office is the keeper of orthodoxy. since revelation ended with the death of john the apostle, apparitions or messages of whatever nature must be suppressed until it satisfies rome. if the message or apparition is contrary to doctrine or against the magisterium of the church, then it is not from God, it is that simple
There are a ton of problems .. here is a nugget, the Lord calls those who love him brothers and sisters, but refers to us as creatures in her writings? The whole thing has the same flair as Maria Valtorta .. it completely re interprets the Catholic doctrine of salvation. I stay far away from it ..
But aren’t we creatures? a “creature” is simply one who has been created, and we were created in Gods image and likeness. If you don’t find it spiritually fruitful then by all means stick to other devotions, but this particular objection doesn’t sound quite right to me. God bless you brother!
We are creatures
It is approved by the Catholic church. Yes, Maria Valtorta is fake. But this one is approved, after long deliberation. Don't go making up your own church.
We are creatures - why do you find it offensive?
Except God and Jesus we are all creatures. Can't see the issue-
Why would it be evil? thats ludicrous.
Thank you. I have often wondered about this.
Excellent! Thank you!
I think this video is confusing by its title. as far as I know, the church has not come out and band Divine Mercy devotion. I’m getting really tired of all of these people making things more confusing. I think you intended to clear things up, but I think too many of us don’t watch the whole video at the statement on the front of the video. There’s a lot going on in the world today and we don’t have time to focus on things that are confusing. Simply state that we are able to participate in divine Mercy devotion. It took many years to get it going at my church, but thankfully, there are people that are participating in it to some degree. Too many people out there still don’t know how important divine mercy Sunday I wish people would focus on that more. It’s pretty darn powerful and I wish more people knew about it.
Toward the end of your video you make the comment twice : WE ARE ALL DEPRAVED. I'll challenge you on that. You sound like
John Calvin. Better to say WE ARE ALL WEAKENED, AND HAVE A FALEN NATURE DUE TO ORIGINAL SIN. DEPRAVED means "totally useless/corrupt. The Orthodox have a good view of our fallen nature: THOUGH WE ARE IN A FALLEN STATE, GOD'S DIVINE SPARK
IN US IS ALWAYS, IN SOME WAY, ALWAYS AFLAME.
This is a good clarification, obviously I was not trying to express the Calvinist notion of total human depravity but rather to express the immense gravity of our sins and therefore the infinite mercy and kindness of God that overcomes even the worst of our sins to make us actually righteous as opposed to Calvin who believed that humans are so rotten that Gods mercy could never actually sanctify us and that it’s really just a coating that makes us seem righteous. I definitely could have worded it better so I appreciate you helping to clarify the true Catholic teaching!
A mistake in the translation which Cardinal Wyotia fixed . Not sure of that spelling
You are funny. I appreciate your dry humor. Thank you for looking into this. I loved your conclusions.
Haha thanks! I’m glad someone other than me thinks I’m funny too!
Can you discuss about why St. Expeditus was not recognized by the Church for a while and his influence on Europe and Latin Colonized countries?
There are many ancient and modern devotions to, for example, The Sacred Heart of Jesus, and a wealth more that are not in question.
We must discern to receive guidance regarding where we enter devotion.
It took a long time to make Saint Sister Margaret Mary a Saint, like at least 300 years. Those who commit calumny against St. Faustina ought to find out about Sister Margaret Mary.
The problems lie with the Chaplet of Divine Mercy itself. First, I will write about the theological issue. As priest Prof. Wincenty Granat wrote:
"In the above prayer, there are essential theological errors: first, the Divinity of the Son is the same as that of God the Father, and therefore it cannot be offered to the Eternal Father; second, it is not permissible to offer the Divinity as a sacrifice in any form; third, it cannot be an atonement for sins, because the Divinity, and specifically God, forgives sins but is not a sacrificial atonement; it is in the human nature of the Savior that He is an atonement for our sins."
Sister Faustina's chaplet contains three serious and fundamental errors, which are also interconnected:
- the negation of the identity of the Divinity of the Son and the Father,
- the blasphemous offering of the Divinity,
- the blasphemous degradation of the Divinity to an atoning sacrifice for sins.
And every Catholic will confirm that this is a theological contradiction. They must. Even a defender of the chaplet, such as priest Różycki, did not deny that "the Divinity cannot be offered to God the Father" (he tried to give a metaphorical context, defending the form, not the content).
Interestingly, the original version of this chaplet, which Sister Faustina's earlier confessor, priest Józef Andrasz SJ, heard, did not contain words about offering the Divinity.
The church says it’s a go.
I've NEVER been drawn to that chaplet. Her diary is totally wacka-doodle. Sacred Heart of Jesus chaplet, the trad rosary as reitered by the Blessed Mother at Fatima [NO, NO, NO luminous mysteries!], Holy Face of Jesus chaplet, and St. Michael Chaplet. Those cover 100%.
Exactly!
I pray the Divine Mercy Chaplet everyday and my faith grows stronger . I do not follow man. I follow the Holy Trinity . Jesus Christ is my savior 🙏
"Heretics, Hypocrites and Fanatics will never received the mercy of GOD!"
Doesn’t everyone receive god ‘s mercy???
I didn’t hear or read it’s banned.
All good teachings which help for the soul the devil is so scared.
Because it's not banned. It was at first for numerous reasons and the ban was lifted once Rome cleared all and understood the roots of this devotion.
It's because the Polish bishops were against it and the Holy Office based its opinion on this, along with its own review.
3 Popes condemned St. Faustina's diary. V2 came along and you know the rest.....
🤦♂🤦♂
So the plan is to just complain about V2 forever? Get over yourself.
@@user-zo2ge3oe8d
So your plan is to "look the other way"?
V2 has created a counterfeit church full of endless scandals and abuses. By their fruits....
Sor Faustina said God united with her as with no other create (what about the BVM??) 🙄🙄
she moved around from cconvent to convent, and you cannot see the original Diary. Why? Why cant you see the original diary??
We should not second guess the decisions of the Holy Office, but obey them
EXACTLY!!
The church reinstated it& Devine mercy Sunday is the week after Easter!!
That says volumes!!
👍👍
It is not ban, you are wrong
Wow. This presentation was awesome. Very insightful, well thought-out, precise, spiritual in the best sense of the word and thorough. New sub here. Keep up the good good work! 👌🥰
It's incredibly unlikely the Church put a living person's unpublished private diary she was currently writting in on the index. Sedes need a reality check, it doesn't even make reasonable sense.
You are not a theologian!! We must obey the church!! To disobey causes devision!!
Jesus christ said he wants unity in his church!!
Go to God for answers and don't be apart of deciding the church!!
All that matters is what happened, and you can easily verify that by doing quick research.
Other than the Holy Bible, the Divine Mercy Diary written by St. Maria Faustina Kowalska is the most important book ever written. Please read the Divine Mercy Diary.
no it is not
Sorry, it's evil.
So the Nazis and Communistscould not stop it. Good luck!
This is the company of those critical.
Let us recite the Divine Mercy Chaplet for his salvation 🙏🏻
I am a supporter of the divine mercy chaplet, so thank you for praying for me and I will do the same for you!
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide Interesting discussion. As someone who tries to say the devotion daily, I confess I've always felt vaguely put off by the prayers attached( start and finish, novena) to it. Even as someone devoted to St Therese of Lisieux, I find them as something more "emotional female" than divinely inspired. I don't find anything heretical in them, so am fine saying them. But I appreciated your discourse on them. Btw not suggesting she isn't a legitimate saint either. Just something Im missing. I can understand (absent the conspiracy theories) why some question.
There is a difference in thepu😢m
I Church between banning and suppression. The Church is always, always, always always the arbitror of any private devotion, as to whether it worthy of belief or not. That takes time.
The Chaplet of Divine Mercy is included in my 1962 Traditional Missal (Baronius) edition
09:52, Col.1:24: YES, Christ's sufferings are lacking something, much pertaining to this video. They are lacking our repentance and the crucifixion of our flesh/will in order to be applied to our souls!
"...I offer Thy Majesty all the works I shall ever do, steeping them in the Blood of Jesus, my Redeamer..."
-part of a prayer to be said every day from the book "The Great Means of Salvation and Perfection" by St. Alphonsus
The Holy Spirit will guide you into all TRUTH! We are to Test the spirits to make sure they are from GOD!
The Divine Mercy in its' essence offers prayers to The Blessed Mother and call for penance and The Holy Rosary. That in itself is good. Believing the seer is another issue. The Divine Mercy should not replace The Most Sacred Heart of Jesus Devotions. The Catholic Church is in a crisis now. Catholics need to be educated on what they are doing. Would a Catholic participate in The adoration of The Pachamama? Kiss the Koran? pray before statues of the heretic Martin Luther? and other heresies? Take heed on what you do and do not do. Most Catholics are ignorant on these issues. Study them~
This was great!
Wonderful video from a small creator!
Thank you so much!
11:01 I think you just did what you were saying not to do with others writings...interpret in the most uncharitable way possible. Constant penance can and should be performed even on feast days and times of not fasting.
Although you tried to address this, I question this work mainly because it has been presented as mercy without the normal conditions. Scripture, Church Fathers, Church teachings, and writings of the Saints have written extensively on in order to obtain mercy (in the form of forgiveness of sins) from God we need to do something (with God's grace) such as Fear the Lord, have true repentance, forgive others as God forgives us. People who follow the divine mercy have trouble believing that anyone goes to hell because, as they say, God is all mercy. But our Faith tells us repeatedly that God is also all just and that every sin must be punished and every unrepentant sinner who dies must be punished for eternity. To gain access to his mercy He requires us (with the help of His Grace) to do certain things...and then He restores innocence to sinners' (Holy Saturday Mass reading).
For things like the brown scapular that is all there. First there are conditions and more to the promise but it has been abbreviated to a prayer on a is literal 2 sq-in cloth! The flip side of the brown scapular promise is that you probably will not die with the scapular on if you are not doing those things. Even if there were not other conditions (which there are) there is little to hope for to someone trying to manipulate the gift giver!
I don't think it is the right thing to talk about God speaking hyperbolically because that is to exceed the realms of truth. In scripture an alternative explanation to what may seem hyperbolic is to properly understand the context of what is being said.
Truth.
I believe that the divine mercy chaplet was probably given by the holy spirit to Saint frostina.
But I find it hard to Believe some of the stuff in that diary. I love the divine mercy chaple it. And I have said it many times and received graces from it. But I can't honestly say that. I believe everything that is in that diary. Another thing I would appreciate you checking on. Is something that bothers me a lot. And that is, why do we call the mass a sacrifice? Why do we just not call it? A remembrance of the sacrifice of Christ. What exactly are we sacrificing on the altar? I have asked this question many times and never received an answer from priest.
Jesus said do this in memory of me.
Why do we just not say the celebration of the mass? The remembrance of the sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ. But that is not what we say.
We we say, may the Lord accept our sacrifice. What are we sacrificing?
Thank you so much for your comment, I’m sorry that no priest has been able to answer this question for you because it is such an essential part of the nature of the priesthood. A detailed explanation may be found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church in paragraphs 1362-1372, which is available for free online. But to answer your question briefly here: the sacrificial offering at the mass is actually Christ. We believe that the mass is the re-presentation of Christ’s crucifixion. Which is to say that Christ’s death on the cross is made present at that time and place when the priest says the words of consecration, so at the mass, we not only remember Christ’s death, we actually witness it as well. As CCC 1367 puts it: “1367 The sacrifice of Christ and the sacrifice of the Eucharist are one single sacrifice: "The victim is one and the same: the same now offers through the ministry of priests, who then offered himself on the cross; only the manner of offering is different." "And since in this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the Mass, the same Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross is contained and is offered in an unbloody manner. . . this sacrifice is truly propitiatory."”
I hope this clarifies things for you, let me know if you have any other questions!
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide I thank you very much. And I appreciate you responding to my comment and trying to explain the sacrifice of the mass. But I still have questions because when you say unbloody sacrifice. I always believe that there is no sacrifice without blood. So how can you have an unbloody sacrifice? This ISIS why the protestants say that we are sacrificing Christ. Every time we say the Mand if that is true then it's not good when Jesus instituted this sacrament. Of the Holy eucharit was in the upper room and it was before he was sacrificed.
Once he was sacrifice, he said it is finished.
So I still have many doubts about that word sacrifice. I even find it hard to say at mass. I I truly feel Bad in my heart when I say that word sacrifice sacrifice.I believe so much in the sacrifice of christ I .feel I am at the foot of the cross all day long
@@suzieroberts2203 thank you so much for following up! It’s very understandable that you’d have some confusion about the “unbloody form” of the mass because it can be a bit confusing if you don’t understand the Aristotelian categories the church is using here. To put it simply, when we say that the mass is presented in an unbloody form we don’t mean that the mass has no blood or isn’t a bloody sacrifice, when the priest says “this is my body” and “this is my blood” Jesus’s body and blood actually become present and so the when priest is holding the chalice, it’s not filled with wine, it’s filled with the precious blood of Christ shed for our sins, but still retains the “accidents” (taste, smell, color, etc) and the “form” (shape and structure) of wine, but the “substance” (the thing that it is) has become blood. And it’s a similar situation with the mass as a whole, where the substance of the mass is the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross which is of course a bloody sacrifice, but the accidents and form of the mass are not bloody. So it’s a bloody sacrifice in an unbloody form.
It is so wonderful to hear that you have such a deep faith and care for the sacrifice of Christ, but of course don’t forget to focus on his triumphant resurrection as well! The fast and the feast!
Please don’t hesitate to follow up if i wasn’t clear enough or you have additional questions, God bless you!
Sr. Faustina~Or are you being disrespectul?
@@richardimon468 I wish you could elaborate on what you just commented to me.Because I do not understand why you would call me disrespectful
Pls dont banned the Divine Mercy
All I'll say is, don't quote or explain what will lead you to hell. Somethings are best left the way they are
@achechecelezco8749 And you know this will lead to hell, are you wiser than the rest of humanity ? Or don't you know what you're writing ????? 🤔😊😎
I don’t like this video. The Catholic Church approves of Divine Mercy Sunday and the Divine Mercy and forgiveness of corporal punishment that we can receive on that day. Gods mercy is poured forth for us on that day. Your arguments are a waste of time. Have faith in the holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church’s teachings.
I’m a bit confused as to why you don’t like this video, because we seem to be in agreement, which argument did you object to?
This is fake news. The Church has not banned Divine Mercy. This kind of lies needs to end ,Satan! In Jesus name
The Divine Mercy Picture has bled
And oil marks comes on the image when we gather in prayer and praise and worship God for his mercy . This guy has no God experience and so his talk is empty .
I think it should be assumed that Our Blessed Mother is a given.
You create UA-cam channel to make money online?
Saint John Paul II made St. Faustina a saint and promoted the Divine Mercy. pray for us ST. POPE JOHN PAUL II .
Paul 2 kissed the Koran.
St faustina plz pray for me i nid ye prayer urgently plz Amen 🙏🙏
I think you should change The Title of your video
I agree, it was misleading, click-bait even.
Which ban Divine Mercy?
You need to make sure that you are not confusing Maria divine mercy the false prophet.
You definitely need to change the cover picture of your video because it is misleading and you don’t want to be held accountable for that.!!!!
While the appearances to St Faustian and the Chaplet of the divine mercy is the true appearances and massages and the divine mercy Chaplet is true devotion and it is very important to these times that we are leaving at because before God’s Justice there is God’s mercy which is represented in Confession because whomever doesn’t pass through God’s mercy he or she will have to pass through His justice and that’s what the Lord said to St Faustina.
LISTEN PEOPLE, THE CHAPLET
OF DIVINE MERCY, WAS GIVEN
TO ST. FAUSTINA BY OUR LORD JESUS HIMSELF. A PHOTO OF HIMSELF WITH THE CHAPLET
OF DIVINE MERCY HE TOLD HER
CHAPLET MUST BE SAID AT 3:PM
Yes 3-6am is hour of mercy in the Spiritual world
The CHAPLET OV DIVINE MERCY
WAS GIVEN TO ST. FAUSTINA BY OUR
LORD JESUS HIMSELF, IN 1938 OR
MAYBE A LITTLE BEFORE. THE ROMAN
CATHOLIC CHURCH HAD NOTHING TO
DO WITH IT, UNTIL ST.FAUSTINA INFORMED THEM TELLING HOW OUR LORD VISITED HER GAVE HER THE CHAPLET ALONG WITH A SELF PHOTO OF HIS TRUE SELF, AND THE CHAPLET SHOULD BE SAID AT 3:PM EVERYDAY
IN MEMORY OF HIS PASSION ON GOOD FRIDAY. AMEN
Were you there? The devil can do great miracles, the great deceiver.I stick to the ancient Faith of my forebearers who have always trusted in Divine Mercy.
@@weissblau Amen to that!!
Good Luck with your Private Revelation. We don't need the church's approval is it. Now a days everybody's a theologian.🤔
Our Lord is outside of time and her Sainthood is ever present to Jesus. Jesus is only saying that she will not go to purgatory which is a Divine Judgment. Why can’t theologians see the obvious. Some within the Church are evil in so many ways.
Sounds like heresy to me~
It’s funny how you embelish Faustina’s revelation while taking other things out of context to make your points.
What did I take out of context?
yes, definitely a self-serving bias, right down to the click-bait.
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide well, all of this - Church Reasons to Condemn the Divine Mercy Devotion by Msgr. Patrick Perez. You quoted from it - partially. That's called taking it out of context.
@@andrewdaniels9698 no, that’s called a citation, it’s not taking it out of context unless I misrepresent what is being said or the omitted portions of the text would change the meaning of the cited portion. By this logic Fr Perez would also be taking St Faustina’s diary out of context simply because he does not include the full text of the diary in his article. So what portion of the article did I omit which was important context for understanding the portions I cited?
IT WAS BANNED.
SHES NOT A SAINT.
READ WHAT SHE WROTE.
TOTAL BS.
JESUS WOULD NEVER SAY WHAT SHE ' SAID" HE SAID!
The Catholic Church canonized her and Pope St John Paul 2 approved it.
@@petercole5858 John Paul also worshipped with Heretics an pagans, placed Buddha on the altar and did quite a few questionable things. Just because someone is canonized doesn't mean we have to believe it. If Faustina had not been from Woytila's homeland she would have been just one among many unknown nuns, definitely suppressed.
@@petercole5858 That does not mean anything anymore with The Novus Ordo.
is the face og Jesus similar to that of the shroud of Turin.
When was it banned?
It was banned November 19, 1958, by St Pope John XXIII and the ban was lifted by St Pope Paul VI on April 15, 1978.
From what you presented she obviously encountered the devil posing to be Jesus. It's quite obvious
I wold love to see a defence video like this one on the pentelcostal heretical "charismatic renewal" movement and it's practices like the baptism in the holy spirit.
Where do u get your info that happen when it first came out what are u trying to pull here
Don't trust this kid. Trust Christ and His Church. Keep in mind, the Novus Ordo is just that. A New Order of things. The post-concilliar "Church". The "Church" of the New Advent. The "Church" of the New Pentecost.
The names are monicers that they use to describe themselves. They are not my words.
The TITLE of this video is misleading. It made me angry and so I almost didn’t listen to it. But I am glad that I did. It’s well said. Thank you.
I thought so, mtoo; but I don't trust anyone who has tried to deceive with such click-bait, so I stick to my orthodoxy.
This is wrong information
What information did I get wrong?
This is not true.
Nice job dude 👍
Thumbnail should add, ..for a time.
You are quite a spiritual person who knows his faith well. Keep it up. Forgot the negative comments. Always Remain Blessed. Amen. Shalom.
Blessed Mary is in heaven and Devine!!
St.faustina was a mortal !!
There is no contradiction!!
Jesus christ said He United himself with a Moral creature!!
Again blessed Mary is in heaven and not mortal anymore!!
This devotion was condemned twice, the strongest condemnation by Cardinal Ottaviani in 1959 who was the head of the Holy Office. There is a document with this condemnation, but I wasn’t able to download it. It was placed on the Index of Forbidden Books, do better research and you will find it.
The argument for those who have a cult like attachment to this devotion always refer to the lack of accurate translation from Polish, what a bunch of nonsense. This is a modernist ploy to try to validate the validity this terrible devotion.
You don’t need more than good catechesis to see the errors in her writings. There are a couple of gentlemen who have done great research into Faustina and they totally destroy any credence to her writings.
You mock the true devotion by Our Lady by diminishing their importance to the salvation of souls. The children of Fatima did tremendous penance especially little Jacinta. You can see the lives of some of the saints who did daily penance for the salvation of souls.
All grace necessary for salvation comes through Our Lady, if you leave her out of the equation you cannot save your soul.
What? You are saying that Jesus cannot save your soul? HE died on the cross to save your soul! Mary did not! You are blaspheming!
@@JohnJones-qy5ko
You obviously can’t read or are just ignorant of Catholic teachings.
@@roexvt630 What am I reading wrong? You literally said that grace from God alone won't save you - "All grace necessary for salvation comes through Our Lady." Does that coincide with the scriptures? Are you familiar with the scriptures?
@@JohnJones-qy5ko
You need to understand the difference between From and Through
@@JohnJones-qy5ko
Our Lady of Fatima said “only I can help you”, she is the vessel Our Lord has chosen to save souls from damnation.
Another popesplainer justifying the obvious heresies in the Diary.
Why does the image of Jesus in the divine mercy painting lack the wounds in His hands? That alone shows that this devotion should not have been approved.
This strikes me as a very silly objection, A simple explanation for why the divine mercy image lacks the wounds of the cross is because it is a depiction of Jesus prior to the crucifixion. The church has routinely depicted Jesus without wounds for centuries. For example, manger scenes also depict Jesus without wounds, should they be condemned as well?
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide Yes a very simple explanation for simple minds. Read your Gospel and see that Jesus told everyone not to tell about His miracles until AFTER His resurrection. Jesus did not want to be known outside of His suffering, death and Resurrection. Jesus's wounds are His GLORY! Read what St. Paul said: "For I judged not myself to know anything among you, but Jesus Christ, and him CRUCIFIED." 1 Cor 2:2 I also noticed that your explanation of the heresies in the Divine Mercy are basically attacks on other approved apparitions. As if to say, if you believe in this approved apparition, then you have to believe in the Divine Mercy because they are both essentially heretical. Shame on you.
@@ChristopherMarlowe yesterday I was praying the rosary at St Peter’s and I noticed a mosaic of Jesus appearing to St margarita maria alacoque, and I noticed that in that image, Jesus was also depicted without wounds. The mosaic was made in 1925 under the reign of St Pope Pius XI, so I guess he’s a modernist heretic too right? Or maybe it’s something totally normal that the church has done for over a century; there is nothing wrong with depicting Jesus without wounds, if you were correct that Jesus never wanted to be to be known other than for His suffering, Death, and resurrection, then we could never depict Jesus’ birth, or ministry. As Catholics, we do not just focus on his death and resurrection (even though it’s most important) but His entire LIFE, death, and resurrection.
As for my other arguments, I’m not attacking other approved apparitions, I simply explain a simple interpretation of St Faustina’s words which would be in line with the Church’s teachings, and point out that if you insist on the most uncharitable interpretation of almost any saint’s words, you will find heresy everywhere, it is not reasonable to give St Simon Stock, and blessed Alan De Rupe the benefit of the doubt when they claim to have heard promises that could be interpreted in a heretical way, whilst refusing to do so for St Faustina, your holding her work to a different standard, and it is not reasonable to do so.
Peace be to you.
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide It's funny that the scandalous Cardinal in charge of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith takes the same tack as you do. The Vatican was popesplaining some new confusing attitude towards the obviously heretical Medjugorgie apparitions, and did so by questioning previous apparitions. You can see that he doesn't have the Faith because he doesn't try to justify what he is doing on its own merits, but rather attacks other articles of faith. No one can justify Medjugorgie's heretical statements that supposedly came from the Blessed Mother, and no one can justify the heresies in Faustina's diary. So they popesplain them away by attacking other Catholic things. I can't speak to the mosaic you are referring to, but I know that Pope Pius X condemned modernism in 1907, so the modernists were already well established at that point.
The point that you are missing about Jesus' suffering and death is that afterwards he entered into His Glory. He only revealed His Glory to Peter, James and John on Mount Tabor. But notice that He told them: "Tell the vision to no man, till the Son of man be risen from the dead." He did not want His Glory revealed outside of His suffering, death and Resurrection.
The MODERNIST trend is to have the Christ with no wounds. It is the happy Christ that forgives everything. There is no penance and no fasting. It is Christ without the Cross.
It is not I who insist on the most uncharitable interpretation of Faustina's Diary, it is the Church. Her Diary was thrice condemned by the holy office, and then brought back by the Polish Pope. The excuse was that it was a "bad translation" but the current translation is still heretical. The only change is the the Vatican is being run by modernist heretics.
There is much, much more to condemn the Faustina Diary. If you are curious, go to the Ascent of Mount Carmel channel. He has MANY videos on the divine mercy devotion: ua-cam.com/video/yI5_4Pi0e8w/v-deo.html
@@doctrinedogmaanddavide I should also add that the painting of the divine mercy was approved by Faustina who selected the artist and dictated how it should look. The mural you mentioned is by an artist commissioned by the Vatican, who was completely removed from St. Margaret Mary Alocoque. So you are comparing apples and oranges, like your buddy Tucho Fernandez.
A misleading video! Not true!!
What RUBBISH
This seems unworthy of time
See the Dimonds on this.
From John XXIII to Francis I are not valid popes. The chair of St. Peter is vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958!
@cipriano yo estoy completamente de acuerdo con Ud En mi opinión humilde y de pecador , todos los papas, excepto por el papa Benedicto XVI que trató de concervar la MISSA TRIDENTINA , NO son válidos para nada 😢🎉
🤦♂🤦♂
Log off bro
Who say this, you? With what authority?
@JoyToTheWorld-v2f i totally agree with you that as time progress there were many changes in the church. But These actions are unacceptable:
1. Changing the mass into protestant inspired novus ordo which clearly violated the Quo Primim of Pius V in 1570 that no man or no pope can change the mass until forever
2. “Pope” JPII kissing the koran which clearly denies the Divinity of Jesus Christ
3. False Ecumenism
4. Humanist Religion as taught by JP II that man is the way, man is the truth & man is the life
5. Europe is back to paganism
6. Bergoglio is worshipping pagan gods like pachamama
7. Cardinal bergoglio allows his cathedral to be used for jewish worship
8. many sexual abuses from clergies
9. Interfaith prayer with other pagan religions organized by jp II in assisi. This is blasphemous act.
And many many more heritic teaching in vatican II religion
Devotion to this from Faustina...you are all deceived.
😮
Should have remained banned.
Thank you for your thoughts, Pope Jeffrey
@@tomthx5804 yeah that's right. Bergoglio is about as much as a pope as I am.
💯🎯👍🏽
@@tomthx5804 👺🤥🤡
Catholics best not speak I'll of the elected Pontiff regardless of how they perceive him. Jesus said to his Disciples, 'Anyone who listens to you listens to me; and anyone who rejects you rejects me, and those who reject me reject the one who sent me. Luke 10: 16 so the pope, Bishop's etc. are still the one's who have apostolic succession, we need to respect and pray for them, to be guided by the Holy Spirit, and lead the Church through these extraordinary time's. If we don't support them with our prayers, then we can't criticize, it's like being critical of a senior family member, instead of supporting them. Prayer can move mountains. 🙏🙏🙏 Jesus said Love one another as I have loved thee. ✝️
Lies ….
It was never banded. Go home get a life
This kid is presumptuous...
Again, JP II is not a Saint!
What do you mean?
@@richardbethencourt1083 he means he’s a Protestant
@@richardbethencourt1083They mean they're just sedevacantist schismatic.
And "Cipriano Trajalala etc." is NOT a Catholic!!
@@arnoeeuwigheid4499I am very catholic because i believe all the Catholic Doctrines which is taught by the founder Jesus Christ to His Apostles and handed down the Sacred Scripture & traditon to the Church Fathers, to the Popes (until Pius XII who died in 1958), to all faithful Bishops & Priest who is validly ordained and preach the true Catholic Faith until today!
The producer of this video must be an enemy of God.
And you must carry devil's water.
He's a Modernist. Does that answer your question?
Nonsense demon protestant
How did you become evil?
I like more the Greek Orthodox church but also I like Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta as well.
There is no salvation outside the catholich church. But true traditional catholic church. NOT vatican II church with Francis Bergoglio Who is not even valid priest
🤡🤡