@@brewed_for_success As a Conservative, I believe in law and order, so I want to fund the police, enforce the law, secure the border and prosecute criminals.
The difference between "lawmakers" and the mob is that when you dealt with the mob you got your money's worth. You kept up your end of the deal, they kept up theirs.
Ugh. I don’t think most people want to keep “law abiding citizens” from owning guns, they just want to figure out how to keep the ones who aren’t from having them. If you’re law abiding, what’s the problem with getting a background check, or get training, or a license, or wait a few days? These same people are the ones who say “what’s so bad about requiring ID to vote?” If you can create hurdles for someone to exercise that constitutional right, then a few hurdles for gun ownership shouldn’t be such a problem, right?
Gun ownership is a constitutional right, they do a full background checks including the occasional conversation with the FBI for gun purchases! And I'm not paying somebody less qualified than me to certify me. If it requires a license then it's not a right! So borrowing the ridiculous stuff everything you ask for already exists.
Using your logic we should go ahead and require a full federal background check ID verification proof of address fill out a short form just a couple pages and don't worry if the FBI is going slow they'll get back to you within 3 days so you can vote. It's just the hurdles that someone goes through to buy a gun. Why not to vote? THAT'S YOUR LOGIC!
@@chain-breakingsageBackground checks and waiting periods are not required in all states. Oklahoma does not have a waiting period, nor are there mandatory background checks. The Oklahoma shooter purchased his 3 hours before the shooting. Each state has its own regulations. A waiting period may have given him some time to cool off, or given someone the opportunity to notice that something was wrong to stop him. If background checks were a requirement equally, why would lawmakers be discussing background checks right now? It is because it is not universal.
I agree with you 100%. I can’t buy a 22 without a back ground check in my republican state. I believe a waiting time for high powered rifles should be a law.
I agree with you , but when it comes to REPUBLICAN lawmakers it's comes down to them getting the money from the NRA. If the Republican politicians would stop getting paid off from the NRA , their votes and gun laws would make common sense. VOTE VOTE VOTE BLUE 💙💙💙🌊🌊🌊🌊
They don't, that's actually on the surrounding Community including Parents, Teachers, and School Administrators; but it'd be nice if that could be Guaranteed and Enforced as a Constitutional Right.
Prairie dog? Really? You're saying that with a straight face? A high powered air rifle/BB gun will do the trick! At least make an effort to make a sensible argument
The arguments have been made and SCOTUS has ruled on them. The second amendment is there for two reasons, as a safeguard against tyranny, and for personal self defense. Some people just don't like it but it seems many more do. The number of gun owners keeps growing and the number of States lifting restrictions keeps growing. No matter what you hear from the main stream media, no matter how doggedly the politicians try to pass unconstitutional laws, it's very clear. Gun control is dieing.
An ar isn’t really a high powered rifle. It’s made for killing small things like the prairie dogs you talk about, and rodents. Not that any of it matters cuz I don’t need a reason to own one.
@@Godlim17 Clearly you don’t know what a 5.56 round does. You’ll need something much more powerful to “vaporize” it. It’s crazy how people as ignorant to guns as you want to regulate them.
@@JustMaples You can kill a prairie dog with an airsoft gun I was making the point that it was overkill. I also was trying to be funny. My education or lack thereof has no bearing on the fact automatic and semi-automatic weapons were initially manufactured for war and they kill at rates meant to do so. If my not knowing everything about a gun makes you sleep better at night knowing harmless children have died more power to you.
After the 2nd amendment what will be the next part of constitution will they take and how will we fight it ,no more gun control we have more than 20thousand laws on the books now,no more we need politician control!!!!!!
Everyone in the household has to approve of the person and pass background checks for anyone getting firearms also. Must take a firearms class. Must register all weapons in state and federal database.
Not only the well regulated militi, but that this was ratified in 1790 and the gun at the time was a MUSKET! Damn, I DESPISE Republicans who can't give a straight answer!! "It's their constitutional right to bear arms." This is getting OLD!
I love how when libs cannot effectively argue ..the RIGHT of the people....SHALL NOT be infringed....that they then try to make hay out of a meaningless preamble that changes NOTHING about the right of the people. Playing to their terminally ignorant base.
Oh look, another "constitutional scholar" parroting that same nonsense that they don't understand. Gosh, never seen THAT fault line of reasoning before.
The second amendment is why we haven't been attacked by other countries with full assault. Countries like Russia and China. Best reason ever to keep the second amendment. 2nd best reason is our own government taken over by banks on Dec. 23 1913 with the federal bank reserve act.
Are you still drunk? You actually think we haven’t been invaded by Russia or China because 32% of Americans own guns? I just erased half of what I typed because honestly it was just mean & I would probably be wasting my time because you are insane and/or wouldn’t know the meaning of most of the words I used. Unfreaking believable.
These weapons were designed specifically to kill humans and are remarkablely efficient . Other weapons designed for hunting are more efficient at hunting animals. I am a Marine armorer ( gunsmith) there are no need for weapons designed to kill humans to replace more efficient hunting weapons. True hunters choose the most effective tools for their sport.
Weapons designed to kill humans are the reason the bill of rights exist in the first place. wtf are you talking about? *THAT* is the point. *To kill Tyrants!* Hunting is for people who like killing and has nothing to do with any rights discussed here.
@@sburgos9621 The Second Amendment wasn't made to protect the people from the government or criminals. It was written as a way for the government to raise an army (militia) when they needed one as there was no standing army in the US when the Constitution was written. The 2nd was also a requirement by the southern states so that they could put together an armed militia to hunt down escaped slaves. Without the 2nd the slave states would not have signed onto the Constitution.
As a 65 yr old from the UK who has probably seen a couple of guns in the whole of his life and maybe heard gunshot once on a farm. The question should be: Why do YOU need a gun at all. If the answer is to protect myself against all the other people with guns, “point made” get rid of them and the carnage will stop.
if u look at the bigger picture, this is why republicans have been trying the hardest to defend school to keep Americans dumb af so they can be easily manipulated and vote republicans. also the dumber they are, the more guns they'll buy. grofit!
they "need" them BECAUSE they have mental health disorders, specifically paranoia and probably grandiose delusions with a god complex. They need to feel like they could be a hero one day.
“The right to bear arms.” Should we be allow to buy our own individual rockets, chemical or nuclear weapons too? Where does that limit to bear arms starts and end? Who decides the limits of that “right to bear arms.”?
Entirely correct. Although idk if you noticed, but there's a wacky interpretation of the 2A going around that says apparently, when it was written, it meant a civilian could own a cannon as well as a musket. Like ok Jimbo. I'm sure your average Continental enlistee could even afford that. The nerve of these ammosexuals...
I’d draw the line at Indiscriminate weaponry. something like nuclear, biological or chemical weaponry can’t be controlled. Mortars, artillery, rockets. Sounds awesome. Could never afford such, but would be a blast to use.
When the Gov Stood down in 2020 riots and allowed cities to burn, and police did nothing, you think the peple did not have the right to have arms to protect them selves. We stood as angry mobs headed towards our neighborhood, police did nothing, no militartry called, buildings cars destroyed... are we supposed to allow our gov to do nothing and accept it and remain defenseless... No.. we had at least 40 people armed with ar-15's, assault pepperball weapons surrounding our homes.... We needed them... The large invading hostile mob decided it was not worth the risk to enter out residential area and businesses because they saw the firepower and knew we could shoot more than 10 rounds at a time.... The second ammendment gives us that right... If we put our faith in our gov to protect us in 2020, we would have lost everything... but we have a second ammendment that kept us safe... Not 1 Rifle was raised.. we stood, guns pointed down.... I am glad you think the gov will protect you... but wait for the day when a mob is headed towards your family and home... you will wish you and your neighbors were trained and had weapons to take care of the situation !
Great comment ! I love USA , married American live in Melbourne , Australia but these shoutings get bigger in atrocity and younger in age the massacre ! It’s heartbreaking , I made my own shrine in honour of those 19 children , 2 teAchers . I teach ballet / jazz to 10 yrs and up so I put myself in that school , I would never recover if I survived . Sending ships filled with. Love , hugs , common sense in politics ! Bless you 🙏
LOL? When you are so ignorant on firearms, you think you can shoot 3 buildings down! LOL!!!! You are an expert in ballistics!!! Seriously not even joking!!
You have to be 25 to rent a car. But only 18 to buy a high powered rifle. It's not about taking away guns from people, it's just being smarter with a vary obvious problem.
Is renting a car constitutional right? we should also raise the voting age to 21 I think that's more important. And you shouldn't be able to join the military till you're 21.
Why do you have to be 25 ,to rent a car ,, because Thai what the people that own them want,it also makes Thier insurance premiums less, and 25 year olds are more experienced at driving , driving car ,and owning a gun has nothing to do with each other,car rental companies are out to may money, and need Thier cars return in good condition,
@@chasthanhburns123 completely agree! All those children dying from 19 year Olds getting married is a huge issue. All these other issues can by ALL means be discussed and debated at another time and place, but people have to be able to live to voting age to make it a worthwhile argument.
What sporting event requires a weapon of war? And, I would argue that anyone who would use an assault weapon to kill a prairie dog needs a mental assessment. Good lord!
Just going to try and honestly answer your questions I'm not attacking you. First it should be said that AR15's have never been used in a war. The M16 is a similar looking weapon but it's not the same. So calling an AR a weapon of war is not accurate. 2nd the most common sporting event AR's are used in is called a "3 Gun" course where participants navigate and shoot three different guns those being a pistol, a shotgun and a rifle. The rifle used is usually an AR. As to varmint control the AR shoots the .223 caliber cartridge which is based on the .222 cartridge which was originally designed as a varmint cartridge. Today the .223 has taken over and is actually the most common cartridge used in varmint control.
@@growlikethewind5788 buddy with all due respect, because you are also respectful, my question is. Is it worth having guns so readily available, is it worth the lives that are taken by a gun. I agree it is not the guns. Here in Canada we are avid hunters, every one had a gun for shooting game, yet we do not have near the amount of violent gun crimes. The stats are clear. If you feel it's worth the lives of innocent children then I guess your going to have high gun crime and mass shootings.
"The constitution does not say that the government shall decree the right to bear arms , the constitution says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed." - president Regan
@David Wang The second ammendment was created not for hunting, not for self defense, but to keep the public armed commensurate to that of the military incase if a tyrannical government. The founders were in favor of private citizens having artillery and any wepon available to the military.
@David Wang the founders were enthusiastic about the most new and modern weapons of the time there were guns that weren’t muskets that can shoot a decent amount of time in a minute. There were multibarreled guns, breech loading guns, and other types of weapons that the founder owned.
It's not a Constitutional right! READ IT! 2A allowed Govs to provide a militia before the National Guard was established. It never gave rights to private citizens. #DoneWithGunsRepeal2A
Agreed, it's a State right, not an individual right "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
All 2 million that was divided between the Senate and House. The NRA is dead, we former members moved to other gun rights groups dedicated to the removal of all Federal firearms laws.
Josh "sporting events" Hawley. Good one, Senator. Did you see that one in Uvalde or Buffalo recently? Almost like a sport, isn't it? Where is your mind? Do you have a conscience?
i hope politicians have kids that don't answer them when they ask a question, so they know how aggravating it is when someone dances around a simple question.
In Canada, we seperated God from our laws and our schools in the 70's. Then we worked on gun laws that only thought about the Canadians, not the lobbies, then we enforced our rights to women and protected the right to abortion, free and safe. Last month our government passed an anti assault and anti handgun law across the country. Canadian people applauded this decision, and as we the Canadian people look at our southern neighbors, we don't believe that deep down inside, you actually care for human life. So, my message is to any family that believes in free health care for all, and safe schools, equal chance and very open hearted country to immigrate to, think of Canada. But don't forget to leave your guns behind. You won't need them here.
Brilliant. In summary, America’s right is bat-shit crazy and has zero respect for human life when it doesn’t keep their pockets lined and power full filled.
Good for you but I think I’ll pass martial law could be introduced at any moment and you’d be screwed. I don’t think it’s smart to put my safety in the government’s hands.
Prarie dogs are a problem if building townships on your land they destroy the grasses attract rattlesnakes and cattle and other livestock break their legs in the holes also prairiedogs carry the black plague. Their is a need to control populations but weapons for murdering in war is not necessary to control populations there is alot easier ways to handle the situation
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Despite the linguistic nightmare that is the second amendment, it does not: 1. say you have a right to any and all weapons 2. say all adults or specify an age 3. say anything about regulations or background checks It also implies that the the right to bear arms is within the context of participating in a militia (as the ideas are within the same sentence...). Therefore you could make all guns illegal except for single shot muskets supplied by congress to state-run militias that are only deployed against rebels and bandits (as was the definition of militia in the rest of the constitution) and not violate the second amendment.
Read James Madison. He was a Virginian who wrote the Amendments. The well regulated militias were to run down escaped slaves besides, our 18th century ancestors were using muzzle loaders
1 KillerDoc42 Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ua-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/v-deo.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - It's interesting that the language - a well regulated militia - does not seem to come into play in any discussions around gun control.
The right according to the founding fathers was invested in the individual because in times of need the militia is the people. It only comes into play from people trying to ban guns who don't understand what the term means. In general, as you sort of show, liberals should have no say on guns.
That's because the founding fathers mentioned that specifically. At the time there wasn't a standing army. Now there is which is why the NRA only count the part after the comma. That's why cannons aren't in there as well. Constitutionalist will agree, however that doesn't play well for the gun lobbyists peace
Ok buuut no one is saying they are try to take away their 2nd Amendment rights. We are saying we need stricter gun control laws. From the people who would abuse the 2nd Amendment. People who have a criminal background, not mentally all there etc. I'm not seeing what's the problem.
Apparently more precious to them than our dozens of dead children. Shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting on into infinity. But don't take away their guns! How freaking selfish is that?
There are single shot rifles that are just as good at killing varmints. That's just a stupid reason. What do these varmint hunts look like? Do they just spray and pray that they hit there target...and technically the second amendment refers to a well trained militia. So unless these people are part of the reserve or standing military, I'm pretty sure the second amendment doesn't actually apply to them. It's only a single sentence long and people have still managed to misinterpret it for there own nefarious reasons. Stupid, just plain stupid.
Why do people think that just because an AR5 can have a 30 round mag, that they can't also have a 5 round mag? And why do you think a hunting rifle that normally has a 4 or 5 round mag, can't also have a 30 round mag? The only difference between AR15s and other semiautomatic firearms is that they are modular, configurable. You can change out an AR15 from .223cal to .300 Blackout or 350 Legend or several other calibers in a minute without tools, many use the same magazine. And no you have a rifle with very different ballistics. You can change your rifle from a plinker shooting .22LR, to a varmint rifle shooting .233, to a deer rifle shooting .350 Legend, to a defense rifle in .300 Blackout. Furthermore, our State National Guard and Reserve Component forces are not militias, the people are militias. If the thinking of the framers was that only our Military, controlled by the Government, needed a right to keep and bare arms, then what was the point of a Right being laid down to begin with? Explain how you think that was the logic behind it, that only Government "well regulated" militias should have firearms, so we need to enshrine that in the Bill of Rights, which protects the rights of the citizenry? But while I can easily speak to why people like the AR15 so much, and why you are completely off base about the meaning of the 2A, I must also explain more of the obvious. That the 2A was written to ensure that the People would be able to resist an oppressive government, our government, not just foreign governments. The fact that our government continues to try to disarm our people is proof of exactly why the 2A exists. There is nothing nefarious about the bill of rights, or the nd Amendment. Guns don't kill people, people kill people, with or without guns. And long ago people figured out better ways to kill large numbers of innocent people without using guns, so exactly what are you thinking you will accomplish? If you really want to fix this problem, then actually deal with it, and help keep families together and strong, make sure children grow up with good values in safe secure homes, learning how to treat other people. Do this and you'll have fewer young people going off the rails and doing these things. And keep thinking that getting rid of firearms or restricting their ownership is going to fix the problem because as soon as firearms are no longer available, they'll rediscover just how easy it is to just use fire or some simple chemical combinations for a toxic gas and then you'll see a scale of tragedy that makes these shootings pale in comparison. You really need to stop thinking that an inanimate object is the problem or that eliminating it is the solution.
you don't spray and pray with a semi auto. One trigger pull one shot. The vast majority of ARs are .223 caliber. It's a big 22. They are light weight, low recoil and a small round that can reach out 200 yrds. Perfect for varmints.
Oh, Jay, they are wrong on so many issues. They blame these mass murders on mental illness then rule to cut funding for mental health programs. They've hated the Affodable Care Act since its inception, but in over a decade have not offered one single, solitary idea to replace or improve it. They complain that police are underfunded or defunded and then vote down the American Rescue Plan that would have increaed funding for police departments all across the country. And now they're working feverishly to preserve the rights of anyone and everyone to own semiautomatic assault-style weapons designed to kill many humans very quickly.
@tom hook asked _"If Americans don't want guns, how could their representatives be pro guns? "_ - Easy answer slick. It's called the NRA, and gun lobbyists. Warren Berger, chief justice during the Nixon administration, said this in 1991. Listen carefully. ua-cam.com/video/f1pd7FcQ7tI/v-deo.html
In my country, where firearms are illegal, our total annual murder stats (by any means) are in mere triple figures (809 last year), whilst your gun stats alone are 5 figures (20,982). Adjusted for population size, our total annual rate is 1.2 per 100,000, compared to the US's 6.3 per 100,000. And that pattern is consistent in nations where they're banned.
I think your numbers are inflated. Take out suicides and crimes with handguns. Then what do you get? No one in the US cares about foreign opinions on our constitutional rights. Sorry you have none
The relationship between gun deaths and mass gun ownership in a population has been proved statistically. There is no other explanation for Americas totally excessive deaths by gun.
Vote against politicians whose campaign ads look like they are preparing for battle, with flax vests and multiple weapons being discharged. But steadfastly refuse to discuss any reasonable gun regulations! And if you prefer to view it as a mental health issue, vote against politicians who are not strongly pushing a well funded, let me emphasize WELL FUNDED National mental health program. No we can't afford it! WHAT WE CAN NOT AFFORD, IS ALLOWING THE INCREASING MORE FREQUENT MASSACRES TO CONTINUE!
A better education system, promotiong of family values, and more rigourous mental health help for kids 1-18 AND adults, could bring down shootings significantly. Every kid that shot up their school was not mentally okay.
1 Just Me Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ua-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/v-deo.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Without guns, it would be like South Korea In South Korea, the police are the king Men should bring money to the police Women should give a body to the police
If you need an AR-style assault weapon to kill game or varmints you should immediately be disqualified from purchasing or owning one. It's like using a bazooka to kill a fly. A moderately-skilled user of firearms can do the same job with a bolt action rifle and it's a lot cheaper to use as well as far less dangerous if it falls into the wrong hands.
Thank you I thought I was an idiot for believing that a hunting rifle would be a better choice for hunting but if I may ask what would you say an AR-15 should be used for?
An AR15 is a great weapon for dealing with feral hogs and other vermin en masse. What does hunting have to do with owning an AR15 anyway. Some folks just like shooting them. Also, it’s the premier weapon for self/home defense.
As you may have noticed before, reasonable arguments or common sense are not a part of American politics. Money and power are, the rest doesn't matter.
if you enjoy or feel the need to shoot prairie dogs with an ar type rifle using the 5.56 ammo that the mass killers are using, you need to be red flagged as having dangerously serious mental health issues. a prairie fog would literally explode into oblivion. the rounds travel at 3 times the speed of a handgun, and begin 'yawing', or turning sideways and then backward, in midair. entering flesh, there is a percussion wave that destroys tissue and shatters bone not even directly hit, and implodes a human body like a building being demolished with explosives.
I see a few of you have never dealt with a few hundred wild pigs destroying your property, and if that's not good enough for ya then take this.. "it's none of your business what I own or why I own it"
When the first amendment was passed were there any newspapers? Radio? Television? and Internet? Do the rights in the Constitution only apply to the 18th century?
In 1804 when Lewis and Clark came to Louisiana, they had a semi automatic rifle that held 47 rounds. The gun they had held alot more rounds than a 25 round AR15.
Why is traitor ...bunker baby seditionist #hitler ...josh holly still making laws for humans?? Just GO through the NRA donations to these Monsters!! And whats with #manchin and the coal donations??
Keep this divisive culture war crap going and there's going to be an untrained civilian army on our streets real soon. Well, perhaps not so much an army as roving bands of maruaders.
So Biden says a 9mm blows the lung out the body but he endorses shotguns for self defense? You know how much more devastating a shotgun blast is to a 9mm? These people try to make these laws and have no idea what they are talking about
This is NOT a constitutional issue. I am so old that I remember when it was illegal to own "weapons of war". This means you could have a normal hunting rifle. Bolt action was the most accurate (not semi-automatic). No one was allowed to own a machine gun, cannon, bazooka or anything like that. No one considered this an infringement of their constitutional right to a gun.
When the Constitution was penned private citizens could own a cannon, by law. Until 1938 felons could still own firearms. I think that's when they banned machine guns, as well, but that might have come a bit later. Whether they could afford it, or not, is an entirely different story. Furthermore, semi-automatic rifles are not weapons of war, or they are, depending upon what your definition of "weapon of war" is. For example, at one point on time weapons of war consisted of rocks and sticks and inn other times it was knives, swords, arrows and axes. During those times, citizens still had access to those same "weapons of war" for self-defense and hunting. Now, in today's time, no military on Earth uses the AR-15 in its arsenal, therefore the militaries of the world have deemed the AR-15 to not be a weapon good for waging war. I would say they're wrong, just on the fact that any weapon is better than no weapon, but that's just me. Lastly, to ban semi-automatic weapons would make every pistol, most revolvers and the majority of rifles illegal. Semi-automatic means the weapon, and yes it's a weapon, loads one round for every trigger pull and one round only. You can't just hold down the trigger and keep firing.
@@johnpatrick1647 actually no a regular Joe could not have weapons of war, these were designed for that specific, from swords to axes, to pikes it was illegal, but you could have hunting weapons and tools, these could be used for war, big difference. The AR 15 is the company name for the weapon, the military designation is M 16, their the same weapon.
@@johnpatrick1647 So you are under the impression that 0 gun owners modify their AR-15? Ever heard of bump stocks? Hell, there are wheels you can put in the triggers to make them gattling guns.
@@JoaoSoares-rs6ecClose, but no cigar. The AR-15 is civilian model of the M-16 but they're fundamentally different in the fact that the M-16's lower receiver can be switched from semi-automatic to 3-round burst to full auto. The AR-15 has no such ability. It is semi- auto only.
do you honestly think that ''right to bear arms'' was intended for the likes of AR15'S whenthe arms they refer to in the 19th century were no where near the technology of today.
If they wanted “right to bear muskets” they could have said such. They said arms, pretty generic. They like us understand technology advances. There were already prototype weapons that could fire without needing to reload in between each shot. Expensive but they existed
Do you honestly think that “right for the free speech” was intended for the likes of Internet and Twitter when the free speech they refer was no where near the global level of today.
I'm living in central Europe, I am 60 now and have never seen a gun in person. I'm living my life without having the thought that I have to defend myself on a daily basis with some weapons. I know nobody who thinks her/his life depends on carrying a weapon. All these discussions to me sound extremely strange and unreal. Can you imagine that?
Um 2020 Chicago, Police ordered not to stop hundreds burning cars and buildings heading towards us as police watched... Yea.. it sucked knowing our own gov would not help, it sucks that we do need these weapons to survive, it sucked it took 40 of us with ar-15's to deter an angry mob from entering our area... but that was our only option.. Sucks but it is a reality in Chicago ! The gov let them destroy anything they wanted... Us armed citizens didn't
@@Madmen604 sad truth but reality none the less. Its better to have the means to defend yourself and what’s important to you than to be at the mercy of those who intend to do you harm. It’s been that way for the longest.
SECOND AMENDMENT A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Sure Josh for "sporting events" that sounds like a legitimate reason. Hell in that case let's make RPG's/grenades available to the general public for "sporting events".
Call your senators and Congressmen let them know that if they don't protect us and our children because they are beholden to nra, they need to be voted out. Make it very clear
I just wish one of them could be honest and say that the gun trade is a huge part of the economy and that people need guns to salve their fragile egos.
When your constitution was written, the majority of these guns weren’t even thought of. The is nothing wrong with updating laws etc. If you don’t, America deserves whatever happens
You don't think the founding fathers who wrote one of the greatest documents in this history of the world didn't think that their muskets/blackpowder rifles wouldn't modernize as the years went by? Highly doubt it. AR-15 is only responsible for 1% of gun deaths In this country which is 48,000 gun deaths a year and handguns are responsible for 80% of these deaths. FBI statistics show that hands and feet kill more people than all rifles and shotguns combined including the AR-15.
@@12_3__i8 Haha. I think before that even. Lever action rifles started around 1837, pump action around 1887. Sure you can use a single shot still to this day, but who would?
@@jaymass1178 Of course! But I think it seems logical to offer a special Varmint permit to those who really need an AR to blow apart prairie dogs. Maybe they are useful to cull feral hogs, but not necessary for smaller critters.
The U.S. Military took a oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution as did the President and Vice President. Law Enforcement took the same oath too. Set down...get back in your seat!
Make stricter laws for using guns in a crime, for murder, etc. and enforce them. America's laxxed judicial system favors criminals vs victims. If you knew you'd get the death or life sentence and more importantly laws being enforced maybe we'd get more criminals off the streets.
How is a Stricter Law going to PHYSICALLY stop anyone? A Criminal is a person caught AFTER they committed the crime. They already did what they wanted to do.
In the old west towns like Dodge City, Abilene, and Wichita, in Kansas, just to name a few, Towns like Tucson, Bisby and Tombstone AZ. All these towns passed laws saying you had to check your fire arms in town, you were not allowed to carry weapons with in city limits, Now you want to pass laws saying pretty much anyone can carry a concealed weapon. Do you remember how lawless those old west towns were? The gunfight at the OK corral had the good guys trying to disarm the bad guys. Remember how that turned out!!Before you had to check your guns the bad guys where usually better armed then the good guys. There is a reason we study history. It is so we don't make the same mistakes as we have in the past. Passing Back ground checks, red flag laws; and raising the age to own a gun is common sense. But because of greedy politicians and corporations, you won't even protect our own children?
Good luck. Cognizant reasoning with Republicans or Nazis are the confederacy had its limits no I didn’t it?. They have put a chip on their shoulder and they are daring “law and order“ to knock it off. We are dealing with assholes, and all we get is an unspoken “fuck you”.
The guns did not make them lawless, the sorts of people packed together shitfaced drunk with seeing no women for months at a time created a lot of tension. The most lawless old west towns look like a rest home compared to a weekend in Chicago.
@@skippyify No, America is not much worse. Certain urban areas in America are much worse and carry almost all of the gun violence (and violence in general) problems. Maybe we can take a look at those things and instead of complaining about symptoms, start getting to causes.
@@jaymass1178 are yoou serious? can anyone just say "bring your gun to the event"? thats just stupid i wouldnt feel safe as an obserer especially in the US with those loose gun laws
@@Maxcraft-1000 What? It's a gun competition! If you don't want to go don't. I could care less how you "feel". I carry everywhere I go. I feel perfectly safe.
The AR 15 comes in caliber choices, and has nothing to do with the damage done. The bullet is primarily responsive for that. It looks intimidating, which is supposed to be a plus, but Democrat stupidity has turned it into a negative! A shotgun blast will do 10x the damage of an AR 15! But, trying to explain this to people who aren't interested in learning the truth, is really useless!
Not my AR15, like the constitution has a provision for semi autos. They said well regulated militia at a time they had muzzleloaders. All else is a lie.
@@cajunstacker1376 The expedition was in 1804, that's 216 years ago, and those repeating rifles were lever action repeating rifles, not semiautomatics.
Right wing democrats take money from the nra too, not just republicans. Rich right winger pelosi just campaigned for a corrupt gun lobby incumbant in texas
I decide what firearm is rite for me not the dam government. The way things are going in this country more citizens should by guns to protect the little freedom we have left. Personally I have had it with this dam administration and want them taken out of office yesterday
If they want to get themselves killed being stupid, unarmed and unprepared, I say let it be. Don't try to tell me or us what "we need or don't need" though. It's none of their GD business!
The radical left wing extremist not acknowledging the Constitution and 2ND Amendment is total BS. That is a impeachable offense and should be prosecuted for it.
its a big business and these politicians need money from those business to keep their position. this is how i understand why they will never make changes about gun laws..
no civilian needs a car that goes faster then 75...that also seems to be a problem...also theres no need for a civilian to decide their diet and die from health related issues...thats also a problem...y dont u care about crash victims or over weight people? are they not people who deserve justice as well and do these people not die just as frequently as gun violence victims...seems like theres just as equally bad issues out there and ur not calling for reform on...why?? not informed? dont care? just forgot?
The obstacle with Red Flag laws is lack of funding. If the court deems a person mentally unfit to own a gun, there is no place for that person to get the healthcare treatment they need. For the past 10-15 years, since the Great Recession of 06-07, states started cutting spending on mental health. And those levels didn't increase when the tax revenues increased. Instead, the state cut corporate and individual taxes.
Short of a zombie apocalypses, I fail to understand how any one would need an AR-15 for anything. It doesn't take one to kill small rodents unless you're a horrible shot... and then maybe we should question if you need a gun at all.
Didn't matter. The AR15 is not the problem. You can do just as much damage with a 22 handgun. Control is the issue. Control and the stupidity of voters that keep voting in idiots like Cruz, Greene, and Trump.
@@boost77071 if you knew anything you would know that ar style rifles are used in self-defense more than any other firearm. That's why we need more than one shot
@@MistedMind ar 15 style rifles is the most common rifle used in self-defense. Tell me what you would rather have in a home invasion situation a bolt action or a semi auto rifle?
In the military we are taught “one shot, one kill”. Its very rare we would go from semi to burst. If you’re doing that you’re in a world of shyt. No reason for civilians to have these weapons.
1 mac scrambles Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ua-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/v-deo.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
This is the biggest load of crap excuses I have ever heard. The only reason to own a semi automatic weapon is to hunt people or destroy property. You do not hunt with these. If you shoot a prairie dog with one of these there will be nothing left of the prairie dog. If you are so sick that demolishing a prairie dog gets you off enough to pay for the ammo to do this then you have no business owning any weapon. I worked as an on site scale operator and nightwatchman out in the middle of the desert. Every weekend drunks, their kids and dogs would come to our gravel pit and blow the windows out of our heavy equipment with semi automatic weapons while their kids were crawling all over the equipment the drunks were firing at. Semi automatic weapons do not belong in the hands of civilians period. End of freaking discussion.
@Tanya Strieff , not hardly. I know about guns. I know how semi autos work I know what kind of of damage they do ,how fast they fire and I am very likely a much better shot than you will ever be. Semi automatic weapons do NOT belong in the hands of civilians.
@Teutonic Nordwind ,people with childlike mentality like you are the least people that should have access to any gun. You can´t handle guns! You would be a danger to other peoples lives if you were equipeed with a pop gun,if your mother will ever risk buying you one!!!
@@jimmyjames6487 ,yeah,that´s fair enough. But TVs don´t massacre 19 children in their schools! TVs and cellphones also doesn´t cause 1900 mass shootings that America has had only in the last 8 years! Taste that number! One can´t get everything one wants, all the time!
The Gop's stance on gun safety laws are absurd and unjust. “If you can convince a man to believe absurdities you can convince him to commit atrocities.” Voltaire
If any of these politicians knew anything about guns, they offer to trade some meaningful legislation to get ride of the NFA which restricts suppressors and SBRs. The length of a barrel and a reduction of 15-20db does nothing for safety and gun owners hate the hassle.
"Constitutional right to bear arms" So why can't ordinary American citizens bear rocket launchers? Surface to air missiles? Tanks? Fighter jets? Because they happen to be weapons of war. For military use only.
Govt officials have power,, and they use it ag trusting, busy, distracted, or naive citizens? Illogical brush off answers given, defending indefensible need for citizens to own AR 15, easily converted full auto rifles. Hunting? Hardly a sport, to mow down defenseless animals w machine guns? Why do responsible grown up need more than, say, semi auto, 8 round rifle for hunting or defense, same as ordinary soldier of WW11?. Gun manuf, and lobbyists have to be morally accountable?
They are great for hunting they are fun to ,shoot, ammo is cheap and they aren't a MILITARY weapon, they have never been used on the battle field And they aren't getting banned/confiscated 😊
@@Doc_Holiday really never understood how anyone gets pleasure from killing wild animals. One of the indicators of a psychopathic personality is a history of torturing and killing animals. The American obsession with teaching their children to hunt, may go a long way to explaining why so many American children exhibit psychopathic tendencies. It is a lack of compassion, and empathy, for the potential victim that allows a teenager to shot a young child at point blank range in the face. Americans are reaping what they sow.
This morning I heard one of the people who were first in the classroom at Uvalde. He said the cell phones on the dead bodies were still ringing from parents trying to reach their kids. All so someone can plunk prairie dogs and feel all tingly at the gun range?
even the idea of hunting anything with these guns is absurd, as the meat would not be edible. it's kind of like throwing a bomb, from what i'm understanding.
@@jamtommy6446 You do have to honor them responsibly. As a split party ticket voter, meaning I vote candidate and issues -- not party affiliation, I say, I began hunting in the 1970s...hey, you, don't be a dumb-as$. Support responsible laws and regulations regarding gun control. An 18 year old doesn't need an AR- or AK-.
@@faithnelson6069 depends on the ammo, but the 5.56 ammo the mass shooters are using works like a bomb inside a body, causing shock waves that do much of the very extensive damage.
Right to bear arms! so the GOP is okay with me buying a rocket launcher? oh wait the NRA doesn't promote it so it's not okay but an AR-15 is a necessity? Both are categorized as a weapon of war and shouldn't be in the hand's anyone especially not a young man that just turned 18. Ask yourself why don't patrol officers carry such weapons like an AR-15? But the SWAT team does, an escalation unit specializes in using it so why would that privilege go to regular citizens without any training and special handling? The GOP logic and rationale are beyond incomprehensible!
“I need an AR-15 because there are guys out there running around with AR-15s and I need to protect myself from guys with AR-15s”…part of the problem not part of the solution.
@@thomasjohn6041 You’re right. Both the AR-15 and the Glock only have one function, to kill people. It doesn’t matter who’s hands they are in, sane or psycho, that function doesn’t change.
My nephew who basically grew up in the country with guns had an opportunity to go to New York with my son and was really concerned that he couldn't bring a gun with him because he believed that New York was a very unsafe place and during his visit without a gun of course said that he was surprised how safe and beautiful the city was and didn't need his gun and that was 5 years ago and simple perception is amazing how it makes people act
LIAR, PROVE THIS really happened! And if it did tell us EXACTLY where and WHEN he went. Going from his hotel room to the hotel bar does not count! Nor does walking down main street during the day...
When seconds count, police are only an hour away, hiding outside.
Also its called the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs.
so much for the "good guys with guns" con-job the rightwing loves so much
@@brewed_for_success find a new talking point ...only a few politicians believe that not everyone.
Keep telling yourself that, nobody else believes your lies
@@brewed_for_success As a Conservative, I believe in law and order, so I want to fund the police, enforce the law, secure the border and prosecute criminals.
If those people are called lawmakers who needs the mob?
Vote them out 😠
The difference between "lawmakers" and the mob is that when you dealt with the mob you got your money's worth. You kept up your end of the deal, they kept up theirs.
Ugh. I don’t think most people want to keep “law abiding citizens” from owning guns, they just want to figure out how to keep the ones who aren’t from having them. If you’re law abiding, what’s the problem with getting a background check, or get training, or a license, or wait a few days?
These same people are the ones who say “what’s so bad about requiring ID to vote?” If you can create hurdles for someone to exercise that constitutional right, then a few hurdles for gun ownership shouldn’t be such a problem, right?
Gun ownership is a constitutional right, they do a full background checks including the occasional conversation with the FBI for gun purchases! And I'm not paying somebody less qualified than me to certify me. If it requires a license then it's not a right! So borrowing the ridiculous stuff everything you ask for already exists.
Using your logic we should go ahead and require a full federal background check ID verification proof of address fill out a short form just a couple pages and don't worry if the FBI is going slow they'll get back to you within 3 days so you can vote. It's just the hurdles that someone goes through to buy a gun. Why not to vote?
THAT'S YOUR LOGIC!
@@chain-breakingsageBackground checks and waiting periods are not required in all states. Oklahoma does not have a waiting period, nor are there mandatory background checks. The Oklahoma shooter purchased his 3 hours before the shooting. Each state has its own regulations. A waiting period may have given him some time to cool off, or given someone the opportunity to notice that something was wrong to stop him. If background checks were a requirement equally, why would lawmakers be discussing background checks right now? It is because it is not universal.
I agree with you 100%. I can’t buy a 22 without a back ground check in my republican state. I believe a waiting time for high powered rifles should be a law.
I agree with you , but when it comes to REPUBLICAN lawmakers it's comes down to them getting the money from the NRA. If the Republican politicians would stop getting paid off from the NRA , their votes and gun laws would make common sense. VOTE VOTE VOTE BLUE 💙💙💙🌊🌊🌊🌊
Children have a constitutional right to survive grade school.
If you cared about kids you wouldn't support abortion which takes the lives of millions of small babies every year.
Children should be safe at school, so lets do that by making schools hard targets.
They don't, that's actually on the surrounding Community including Parents, Teachers, and School Administrators; but it'd be nice if that could be Guaranteed and Enforced as a Constitutional Right.
gun nuts are willing to sacrifice all of them in order to keep their ammosexual fantasies
From the GoP point of view that only true if the children is not born yet. After that they dont care.
Just shows who the Republicans are working for and it's obvious that they are not doing the people's work!!
Prairie dog? Really? You're saying that with a straight face? A high powered air rifle/BB gun will do the trick! At least make an effort to make a sensible argument
The arguments have been made and SCOTUS has ruled on them. The second amendment is there for two reasons, as a safeguard against tyranny, and for personal self defense. Some people just don't like it but it seems many more do. The number of gun owners keeps growing and the number of States lifting restrictions keeps growing. No matter what you hear from the main stream media, no matter how doggedly the politicians try to pass unconstitutional laws, it's very clear. Gun control is dieing.
Maybe you want to vaporize the prairie dog lol
An ar isn’t really a high powered rifle. It’s made for killing small things like the prairie dogs you talk about, and rodents. Not that any of it matters cuz I don’t need a reason to own one.
@@Godlim17 Clearly you don’t know what a 5.56 round does. You’ll need something much more powerful to “vaporize” it. It’s crazy how people as ignorant to guns as you want to regulate them.
@@JustMaples You can kill a prairie dog with an airsoft gun I was making the point that it was overkill. I also was trying to be funny.
My education or lack thereof has no bearing on the fact automatic and semi-automatic weapons were initially manufactured for war and they kill at rates meant to do so. If my not knowing everything about a gun makes you sleep better at night knowing harmless children have died more power to you.
Guess what? Our guns isn't going anywhere!
After the 2nd amendment what will be the next part of constitution will they take and how will we fight it ,no more gun control we have more than 20thousand laws on the books now,no more we need politician control!!!!!!
No semi-automatic guns for anyone under 21 unless affiliation with military or law enforcement.
No voting for people under 21 either.
Almost EVERY gun is semi auto.
Everyone in the household has to approve of the person and pass background checks for anyone getting firearms also.
Must take a firearms class.
Must register all weapons in state and federal database.
Then what happens when a 21 year old commits a mass shooting?
Because banning drugs was such a resounding success!
"A well regulated militia", amazing how these "lawmakers" just breeze past the first part of the amendment when it means money for them.
They'll oppose anything if it's going to mean losing money.
@@indio2935 and pissing off the insane and violent base they've cultivated.
Not only the well regulated militi, but that this was ratified in 1790 and the gun at the time was a MUSKET! Damn, I DESPISE Republicans who can't give a straight answer!! "It's their constitutional right to bear arms." This is getting OLD!
I love how when libs cannot effectively argue ..the RIGHT of the people....SHALL NOT be infringed....that they then try to make hay out of a meaningless preamble that changes NOTHING about the right of the people. Playing to their terminally ignorant base.
Oh look, another "constitutional scholar" parroting that same nonsense that they don't understand. Gosh, never seen THAT fault line of reasoning before.
its not the right to bear arms its the right to earn money of manufacturers and legislators
Let's be Honest we knew
ua-cam.com/video/Af4CzHlvN50/v-deo.html
The second amendment is why we haven't been attacked by other countries with full assault. Countries like Russia and China. Best reason ever to keep the second amendment. 2nd best reason is our own government taken over by banks on Dec. 23 1913 with the federal bank reserve act.
Are you still drunk? You actually think we haven’t been invaded by Russia or China because 32% of Americans own guns? I just erased half of what I typed because honestly it was just mean & I would probably be wasting my time because you are insane and/or wouldn’t know the meaning of most of the words I used. Unfreaking believable.
These weapons were designed specifically to kill humans and are remarkablely efficient . Other weapons designed for hunting are more efficient at hunting animals. I am a Marine armorer ( gunsmith) there are no need for weapons designed to kill humans to replace more efficient hunting weapons. True hunters choose the most effective tools for their sport.
Oh geez another pog trying to ack like he knows something 😂
The 2nd Amendment wasn't made to protect hunters and you know that.
Weapons designed to kill humans are the reason the bill of rights exist in the first place. wtf are you talking about? *THAT* is the point. *To kill Tyrants!* Hunting is for people who like killing and has nothing to do with any rights discussed here.
@@sburgos9621 if the Russians or Chinese invade the U.S. They're dropping nukes not troops.
@@sburgos9621 The Second Amendment wasn't made to protect the people from the government or criminals. It was written as a way for the government to raise an army (militia) when they needed one as there was no standing army in the US when the Constitution was written. The 2nd was also a requirement by the southern states so that they could put together an armed militia to hunt down escaped slaves. Without the 2nd the slave states would not have signed onto the Constitution.
As a 65 yr old from the UK who has probably seen a couple of guns in the whole of his life and maybe heard gunshot once on a farm. The question should be: Why do YOU need a gun at all. If the answer is to protect myself against all the other people with guns, “point made” get rid of them and the carnage will stop.
if u look at the bigger picture, this is why republicans have been trying the hardest to defend school to keep Americans dumb af so they can be easily manipulated and vote republicans. also the dumber they are, the more guns they'll buy. grofit!
I dunno. I talked to several women who own a Firearm. They claim they are not giving up their firearms. They carry for protection when walking alone.
they "need" them BECAUSE they have mental health disorders, specifically paranoia and probably grandiose delusions with a god complex. They need to feel like they could be a hero one day.
I thought we kicked you Redcoats out in 1776 so we wouldn't have to hear your thoughts on anything any longer.
@Real Aiglon 😂😂😂😂😂 If Americans are so qualified in talking about guns. Why do you have the gun violence/deaths per capita than any other nations???
“The right to bear arms.” Should we be allow to buy our own individual rockets, chemical or nuclear weapons too? Where does that limit to bear arms starts and end? Who decides the limits of that “right to bear arms.”?
@@JR3714 this logic of right to bear arms doesn’t make any sense and you are right.
Entirely correct. Although idk if you noticed, but there's a wacky interpretation of the 2A going around that says apparently, when it was written, it meant a civilian could own a cannon as well as a musket. Like ok Jimbo. I'm sure your average Continental enlistee could even afford that. The nerve of these ammosexuals...
I’d draw the line at Indiscriminate weaponry. something like nuclear, biological or chemical weaponry can’t be controlled.
Mortars, artillery, rockets. Sounds awesome. Could never afford such, but would be a blast to use.
When the Gov Stood down in 2020 riots and allowed cities to burn, and police did nothing, you think the peple did not have the right to have arms to protect them selves. We stood as angry mobs headed towards our neighborhood, police did nothing, no militartry called, buildings cars destroyed... are we supposed to allow our gov to do nothing and accept it and remain defenseless... No.. we had at least 40 people armed with ar-15's, assault pepperball weapons surrounding our homes.... We needed them... The large invading hostile mob decided it was not worth the risk to enter out residential area and businesses because they saw the firepower and knew we could shoot more than 10 rounds at a time.... The second ammendment gives us that right... If we put our faith in our gov to protect us in 2020, we would have lost everything... but we have a second ammendment that kept us safe... Not 1 Rifle was raised.. we stood, guns pointed down.... I am glad you think the gov will protect you... but wait for the day when a mob is headed towards your family and home... you will wish you and your neighbors were trained and had weapons to take care of the situation !
@@robertwadas pretty sad state of affairs when you believe you need military weapons to live a peaceful life.......U S A! U S A!🤪👍
Shall Not Be Infringed!!!
One person said he needed it for protection inside his apartment. I like his logic because if you miss you might still get somebody 3 buildings down.
Where did you get your ballistics degree from?
Great comment ! I love USA , married American live in Melbourne , Australia but these shoutings get bigger in atrocity and younger in age the massacre ! It’s heartbreaking , I made my own shrine in honour of those 19 children , 2 teAchers . I teach ballet / jazz to 10 yrs and up so I put myself in that school , I would never recover if I survived . Sending ships filled with. Love , hugs , common sense in politics ! Bless you 🙏
300 Blackout/subsonic ammo
Problem mitigated
Also, it was only one person, so don't take away the rights of millions of other law abiding people.
Who the hell did he piss off that he needs to protect himself from someone in his apartment?
LOL? When you are so ignorant on firearms, you think you can shoot 3 buildings down! LOL!!!! You are an expert in ballistics!!! Seriously not even joking!!
You have to be 25 to rent a car. But only 18 to buy a high powered rifle. It's not about taking away guns from people, it's just being smarter with a vary obvious problem.
If the age to carry arms is raised the age to marry, vote, and be drafted needs to be raised also.
It is 100% about taking guns from people.
Learn history and stop trusting politicians.
Is renting a car constitutional right? we should also raise the voting age to 21 I think that's more important. And you shouldn't be able to join the military till you're 21.
Why do you have to be 25 ,to rent a car ,, because Thai what the people that own them want,it also makes Thier insurance premiums less, and 25 year olds are more experienced at driving , driving car ,and owning a gun has nothing to do with each other,car rental companies are out to may money, and need Thier cars return in good condition,
@@chasthanhburns123 completely agree! All those children dying from 19 year Olds getting married is a huge issue. All these other issues can by ALL means be discussed and debated at another time and place, but people have to be able to live to voting age to make it a worthwhile argument.
What sporting event requires a weapon of war? And, I would argue that anyone who would use an assault weapon to kill a prairie dog needs a mental assessment. Good lord!
Just going to try and honestly answer your questions I'm not attacking you. First it should be said that AR15's have never been used in a war. The M16 is a similar looking weapon but it's not the same. So calling an AR a weapon of war is not accurate. 2nd the most common sporting event AR's are used in is called a "3 Gun" course where participants navigate and shoot three different guns those being a pistol, a shotgun and a rifle. The rifle used is usually an AR. As to varmint control the AR shoots the .223 caliber cartridge which is based on the .222 cartridge which was originally designed as a varmint cartridge. Today the .223 has taken over and is actually the most common cartridge used in varmint control.
It’s not about sporting. The 2nd amendment was specifically written to protect weapons of war.
@@growlikethewind5788
How many rounds can you shoot with a ar15 within a minute a serious question
@@jasonturner383
And you are still quite welcome to have an 18th century musket
@@growlikethewind5788 buddy with all due respect, because you are also respectful, my question is. Is it worth having guns so readily available, is it worth the lives that are taken by a gun.
I agree it is not the guns. Here in Canada we are avid hunters, every one had a gun for shooting game, yet we do not have near the amount of violent gun crimes. The stats are clear. If you feel it's worth the lives of innocent children then I guess your going to have high gun crime and mass shootings.
"The constitution does not say that the government shall decree the right to bear arms , the constitution says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed."
- president Regan
@David Wang The second ammendment was created not for hunting, not for self defense, but to keep the public armed commensurate to that of the military incase if a tyrannical government.
The founders were in favor of private citizens having artillery and any wepon available to the military.
@David Wang the founders were enthusiastic about the most new and modern weapons of the time there were guns that weren’t muskets that can shoot a decent amount of time in a minute.
There were multibarreled guns, breech loading guns, and other types of weapons that the founder owned.
He also made open carry in California illegal because of the black panther party he is still anti 2a by his bigotry and hate🤷🏾♂️
protection from cnn
The constitution needs to be updated for modern times both first and second amendment. Disinformation and ar15s werent rampant then
It's not a Constitutional right! READ IT! 2A allowed Govs to provide a militia before the National Guard was established. It never gave rights to private citizens. #DoneWithGunsRepeal2A
The Supreme Court has already decided that the right does apply to private citizens
And even if it didn't what are you going to do with the millions of people that already have guns?
Agreed, it's a State right, not an individual right "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
@@AmericanPatriot5 Money trumps Constitution, eh?
@@AmericanPatriot5 The supreme court is wrong just like they are on alot of things are you for over turning Roe vs Wade?
Start asking them about the NRA money they get. That exposes everything you need to know.
Can we ask about the REAL payola from Big Pharma while were at it?
All 2 million that was divided between the Senate and House. The NRA is dead, we former members moved to other gun rights groups dedicated to the removal of all Federal firearms laws.
Josh "sporting events" Hawley. Good one, Senator. Did you see that one in Uvalde or Buffalo recently? Almost like a sport, isn't it? Where is your mind? Do you have a conscience?
Democrats support thugs having guns but not regular American citizens
No. No compassion, no morals, no ethics, no soul. All greed @GOP
No conscience
@Communication Failure7600 Why do you live in a black and white world--a zero sum game of multiple choice?
Are you forgetting he is a card carrying member of the gun party?
i hope politicians have kids that don't answer them when they ask a question, so they know how aggravating it is when someone dances around a simple question.
ua-cam.com/video/ieqt9nYekkw/v-deo.html
most politicians are too old to have young children
This is why you need an ar ua-cam.com/video/TemPi-X9MV4/v-deo.html
In Canada, we seperated God from our laws and our schools in the 70's. Then we worked on gun laws that only thought about the Canadians, not the lobbies, then we enforced our rights to women and protected the right to abortion, free and safe. Last month our government passed an anti assault and anti handgun law across the country. Canadian people applauded this decision, and as we the Canadian people look at our southern neighbors, we don't believe that deep down inside, you actually care for human life. So, my message is to any family that believes in free health care for all, and safe schools, equal chance and very open hearted country to immigrate to, think of Canada. But don't forget to leave your guns behind. You won't need them here.
Lol yeah live under Trudeau's tyranny
Brilliant. In summary, America’s right is bat-shit crazy and has zero respect for human life when it doesn’t keep their pockets lined and power full filled.
@@Grimoire933 please give one example of living under tyranny
Good for you but I think I’ll pass martial law could be introduced at any moment and you’d be screwed. I don’t think it’s smart to put my safety in the government’s hands.
@@Chris-hupe No. They don't run our government. They put their hand in the back pocket of lawmakers so that they can subvert, twist our government.
Prairie dogs are actually extremely integral to the ecosystem, basically little home builders for other animals.
With the number of firearms in America it's a wonder there's any wild life left.
Prarie dogs are a problem if building townships on your land they destroy the grasses attract rattlesnakes and cattle and other livestock break their legs in the holes also prairiedogs carry the black plague. Their is a need to control populations but weapons for murdering in war is not necessary to control populations there is alot easier ways to handle the situation
@Jebus Hypocristos I agree and that's what I said also
Wild Hogs
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Despite the linguistic nightmare that is the second amendment, it does not:
1. say you have a right to any and all weapons
2. say all adults or specify an age
3. say anything about regulations or background checks
It also implies that the the right to bear arms is within the context of participating in a militia (as the ideas are within the same sentence...).
Therefore you could make all guns illegal except for single shot muskets supplied by congress to state-run militias that are only deployed against rebels and bandits (as was the definition of militia in the rest of the constitution) and not violate the second amendment.
Owning a gun is a privilege not a right 2nd amendment is outdated!
Nothing is absolute, especially the 2nd Amendment!
Read James Madison. He was a Virginian who wrote the Amendments. The well regulated militias were to run down escaped slaves besides, our 18th century ancestors were using muzzle loaders
Hahaha --- Keep coping, it's not going to change in this lifetime or the next.
@@indianapublicland7429 Your 1st is outdated. Goodbye.
For all of you against owning Ar15’s & want them banned. What will you do with 100’s of millions that is already in the public?
1 KillerDoc42 Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ua-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/v-deo.html
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - It's interesting that the language - a well regulated militia - does not seem to come into play in any discussions around gun control.
Probably because the Supreme Court ruled some time ago that the right to bear arms is not connected to militia service.
@@mr.bisley2748 Read the text: it's for people in the militia.
A bunch of half-cocked yahoo's running around with AR-15's shooting anything that moves does not constitute a well regulated militia.
The right according to the founding fathers was invested in the individual because in times of need the militia is the people.
It only comes into play from people trying to ban guns who don't understand what the term means.
In general, as you sort of show, liberals should have no say on guns.
That's because the founding fathers mentioned that specifically. At the time there wasn't a standing army. Now there is which is why the NRA only count the part after the comma. That's why cannons aren't in there as well. Constitutionalist will agree, however that doesn't play well for the gun lobbyists peace
Ok buuut no one is saying they are try to take away their 2nd Amendment rights. We are saying we need stricter gun control laws. From the people who would abuse the 2nd Amendment. People who have a criminal background, not mentally all there etc. I'm not seeing what's the problem.
Prairie dogs, sporting events, or the lives of our children it seems very simple Republicans
which sports requires automatic assault weapons? is it basketball or baseball that requires it?
@@TheAllMightyGodofCod maybe that’s a question to ask Josh not me.
@I Am Retired don’t be so hard on yourself.
@@TheAllMightyGodofCod The right to a gun isnt for shooting as a sport or hunting it is to shoot humans in an invading army.
Apparently more precious to them than our dozens of dead children. Shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting after shooting on into infinity. But don't take away their guns! How freaking selfish is that?
There are single shot rifles that are just as good at killing varmints. That's just a stupid reason. What do these varmint hunts look like? Do they just spray and pray that they hit there target...and technically the second amendment refers to a well trained militia. So unless these people are part of the reserve or standing military, I'm pretty sure the second amendment doesn't actually apply to them. It's only a single sentence long and people have still managed to misinterpret it for there own nefarious reasons. Stupid, just plain stupid.
The militia is the people
@@dick8997 in defense of their state or their country
@@dick8997 and this isn't about honorable well-trained responsible gun owners. It's about everyone who isn't.
Why do people think that just because an AR5 can have a 30 round mag, that they can't also have a 5 round mag? And why do you think a hunting rifle that normally has a 4 or 5 round mag, can't also have a 30 round mag? The only difference between AR15s and other semiautomatic firearms is that they are modular, configurable. You can change out an AR15 from .223cal to .300 Blackout or 350 Legend or several other calibers in a minute without tools, many use the same magazine. And no you have a rifle with very different ballistics. You can change your rifle from a plinker shooting .22LR, to a varmint rifle shooting .233, to a deer rifle shooting .350 Legend, to a defense rifle in .300 Blackout.
Furthermore, our State National Guard and Reserve Component forces are not militias, the people are militias. If the thinking of the framers was that only our Military, controlled by the Government, needed a right to keep and bare arms, then what was the point of a Right being laid down to begin with? Explain how you think that was the logic behind it, that only Government "well regulated" militias should have firearms, so we need to enshrine that in the Bill of Rights, which protects the rights of the citizenry?
But while I can easily speak to why people like the AR15 so much, and why you are completely off base about the meaning of the 2A, I must also explain more of the obvious. That the 2A was written to ensure that the People would be able to resist an oppressive government, our government, not just foreign governments. The fact that our government continues to try to disarm our people is proof of exactly why the 2A exists. There is nothing nefarious about the bill of rights, or the nd Amendment. Guns don't kill people, people kill people, with or without guns. And long ago people figured out better ways to kill large numbers of innocent people without using guns, so exactly what are you thinking you will accomplish?
If you really want to fix this problem, then actually deal with it, and help keep families together and strong, make sure children grow up with good values in safe secure homes, learning how to treat other people. Do this and you'll have fewer young people going off the rails and doing these things. And keep thinking that getting rid of firearms or restricting their ownership is going to fix the problem because as soon as firearms are no longer available, they'll rediscover just how easy it is to just use fire or some simple chemical combinations for a toxic gas and then you'll see a scale of tragedy that makes these shootings pale in comparison. You really need to stop thinking that an inanimate object is the problem or that eliminating it is the solution.
you don't spray and pray with a semi auto. One trigger pull one shot. The vast majority of ARs are .223 caliber. It's a big 22. They are light weight, low recoil and a small round that can reach out 200 yrds. Perfect for varmints.
As a Republican, I am ashamed of Republican senators and representatives for the first time. They are totally wrong on the gun control issue.
THANK you!
You are not a Republican.
As a pro gun Democrat thank you!
And Trump didn't shame you though...Sarah palin being brought on the national scene, back in the day, was a harbinger of the nutbaggery to come
Oh, Jay, they are wrong on so many issues. They blame these mass murders on mental illness then rule to cut funding for mental health programs. They've hated the Affodable Care Act since its inception, but in over a decade have not offered one single, solitary idea to replace or improve it. They complain that police are underfunded or defunded and then vote down the American Rescue Plan that would have increaed funding for police departments all across the country. And now they're working feverishly to preserve the rights of anyone and everyone to own semiautomatic assault-style weapons designed to kill many humans very quickly.
These politicians make me sick.They love their power but don’t care about the people that voted them in
@tom hook asked _"If Americans don't want guns, how could their representatives be pro guns? "_
-
Easy answer slick. It's called the NRA, and gun lobbyists. Warren Berger, chief justice during the Nixon administration, said this in 1991. Listen carefully. ua-cam.com/video/f1pd7FcQ7tI/v-deo.html
The answer is "they don't". Its purely a "want".
There's no good reason. Certainly not a need.
Senator Thune has a screw loose. What the hell kind of a response is that?
In my country, where firearms are illegal, our total annual murder stats (by any means) are in mere triple figures (809 last year), whilst your gun stats alone are 5 figures (20,982). Adjusted for population size, our total annual rate is 1.2 per 100,000, compared to the US's 6.3 per 100,000. And that pattern is consistent in nations where they're banned.
With our failings in the educational system in the US, we don't have as many citizens here that understand statistics. Good try, though.
@diveunder If his name is an indication: Australia - 1997
What country?
I think your numbers are inflated. Take out suicides and crimes with handguns. Then what do you get? No one in the US cares about foreign opinions on our constitutional rights. Sorry you have none
The relationship between gun deaths and mass gun ownership in a population has been proved statistically. There is no other explanation for Americas totally excessive deaths by gun.
Vote against politicians whose campaign ads look like they are preparing for battle, with flax vests and multiple weapons being discharged. But steadfastly refuse to discuss any reasonable gun regulations!
And if you prefer to view it as a mental health issue, vote against politicians who are not strongly pushing a well funded, let me emphasize WELL FUNDED National mental health program.
No we can't afford it! WHAT WE CAN NOT AFFORD, IS ALLOWING THE INCREASING MORE FREQUENT MASSACRES TO CONTINUE!
And if politicians use dead children to push their agenda they need to be out
A better education system, promotiong of family values, and more rigourous mental health help for kids 1-18 AND adults, could bring down shootings significantly. Every kid that shot up their school was not mentally okay.
Why do people need electric cars when gas cars are proven to be more earth friendly? FJB!
1 Just Me Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ua-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/v-deo.html
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
"What we're talking about most is how to avoid the subject"
Without guns, it would be like South Korea
In South Korea, the police are the king
Men should bring money to the police
Women should give a body to the police
Food shortage is coming this Fall as planned. Check out the following site
operation
disclosure
official
18 year olds don't need an AR-15.
Nobody 'needs' an AR-15
@@jools2323 THANK YOU!!!
I'm not 18, but I want one... I like the way some of them look.
I was given an M-60, M-16 A2, .45 ACP, and fragmentation grenades by the U.S. government when I was 17 years old. So.....
@@warrengoss7547 did the Army train you on responsibility with those weapons? Yes. Can't say the same for an 18 yr old purchasing an AR can you pal?
If you need an AR-style assault weapon to kill game or varmints you should immediately be disqualified from purchasing or owning one. It's like using a bazooka to kill a fly. A moderately-skilled user of firearms can do the same job with a bolt action rifle and it's a lot cheaper to use as well as far less dangerous if it falls into the wrong hands.
Thank you I thought I was an idiot for believing that a hunting rifle would be a better choice for hunting but if I may ask what would you say an AR-15 should be used for?
An AR15 is a great weapon for dealing with feral hogs and other vermin en masse.
What does hunting have to do with owning an AR15 anyway. Some folks just like shooting them.
Also, it’s the premier weapon for self/home defense.
As you may have noticed before, reasonable arguments or common sense are not a part of American politics. Money and power are, the rest doesn't matter.
if you enjoy or feel the need to shoot prairie dogs with an ar type rifle using the 5.56 ammo that the mass killers are using, you need to be red flagged as having dangerously serious mental health issues. a prairie fog would literally explode into oblivion. the rounds travel at 3 times the speed of a handgun, and begin 'yawing', or turning sideways and then backward, in midair. entering flesh, there is a percussion wave that destroys tissue and shatters bone not even directly hit, and implodes a human body like a building being demolished with explosives.
I see a few of you have never dealt with a few hundred wild pigs destroying your property, and if that's not good enough for ya then take this.. "it's none of your business what I own or why I own it"
Last Sunday over 80 people slaughtered in a Nigerian church by Islamic Terrorists, Where is this story in CNN???? 🦗
when the second amendment was passed how many assault rifles were available?
There were plenty of cannons and grenades and warships lmao thats got to be at least the same as an AR15
Focus on the problem and that would be the criminal, thanks
Uhhh, none?
When the first amendment was passed were there any newspapers? Radio? Television? and Internet? Do the rights in the Constitution only apply to the 18th century?
In 1804 when Lewis and Clark came to Louisiana, they had a semi automatic rifle that held 47 rounds. The gun they had held alot more rounds than a 25 round AR15.
Even the police are afraid of these hard core military weapons. Seems like we want an untrained civilian army loose on the streets.
No they aren't. It's a single shot weapon, same as any handgun.
Why is traitor ...bunker baby seditionist #hitler ...josh holly still making laws for humans?? Just GO through the NRA donations to these Monsters!!
And whats with #manchin and the coal donations??
Lol dude you are too ignorant to have a say.
It's not a military weapon. Nor is it hard core.
@L Macdonald Stop spreading misinformation. If it is a military weapon then why doesn't the military use single shot AR's?
Keep this divisive culture war crap going and there's going to be an untrained civilian army on our streets real soon. Well, perhaps not so much an army as roving bands of maruaders.
I think almost all gun owners would agree to a double barrel shot gun and a bolt action rifle. It's too bad the NRA owns so many senators.
So now you know what 150 million people think?
So Biden says a 9mm blows the lung out the body but he endorses shotguns for self defense? You know how much more devastating a shotgun blast is to a 9mm? These people try to make these laws and have no idea what they are talking about
That's rly all you need. ARs are over powered and too high capacity for "legitimate hunting purposes"💀
@diveunder neither does my DDM4V7 Pro.
@@isaaccuster4329 Only you mentioned hunting. the constitution mentions standing against a government.
This is NOT a constitutional issue. I am so old that I remember when it was illegal to own "weapons of war". This means you could have a normal hunting rifle. Bolt action was the most accurate (not semi-automatic). No one was allowed to own a machine gun, cannon, bazooka or anything like that. No one considered this an infringement of their constitutional right to a gun.
When the Constitution was penned private citizens could own a cannon, by law.
Until 1938 felons could still own firearms.
I think that's when they banned machine guns, as well, but that might have come a bit later.
Whether they could afford it, or not, is an entirely different story.
Furthermore, semi-automatic rifles are not weapons of war, or they are, depending upon what your definition of "weapon of war" is.
For example, at one point on time weapons of war consisted of rocks and sticks and inn other times it was knives, swords, arrows and axes.
During those times, citizens still had access to those same "weapons of war" for self-defense and hunting.
Now, in today's time, no military on Earth uses the AR-15 in its arsenal, therefore the militaries of the world have deemed the AR-15 to not be a weapon good for waging war. I would say they're wrong, just on the fact that any weapon is better than no weapon, but that's just me.
Lastly, to ban semi-automatic weapons would make every pistol, most revolvers and the majority of rifles illegal.
Semi-automatic means the weapon, and yes it's a weapon, loads one round for every trigger pull and one round only. You can't just hold down the trigger and keep firing.
@@johnpatrick1647 actually no a regular Joe could not have weapons of war, these were designed for that specific, from swords to axes, to pikes it was illegal, but you could have hunting weapons and tools, these could be used for war, big difference.
The AR 15 is the company name for the weapon, the military designation is M 16, their the same weapon.
It's illegal to hold such weapons in several countries, to have munitions in your possession is very serious by itself.
@@johnpatrick1647 So you are under the impression that 0 gun owners modify their AR-15? Ever heard of bump stocks? Hell, there are wheels you can put in the triggers to make them gattling guns.
@@JoaoSoares-rs6ecClose, but no cigar. The AR-15 is civilian model of the M-16 but they're fundamentally different in the fact that the M-16's lower receiver can be switched from semi-automatic to 3-round burst to full auto.
The AR-15 has no such ability. It is semi- auto only.
do you honestly think that ''right to bear arms'' was intended for the likes of AR15'S whenthe arms they refer to in the 19th century were no where near the technology of today.
The govt is becoming more controlling and oppressive. Citizens have the right to bear arms because one day they will come for us
If they wanted “right to bear muskets” they could have said such.
They said arms, pretty generic. They like us understand technology advances. There were already prototype weapons that could fire without needing to reload in between each shot. Expensive but they existed
Do you honestly think that “right for the free speech” was intended for the likes of Internet and Twitter when the free speech they refer was no where near the global level of today.
Yes.
@@The_SmorgMan yeah, they also thought coke was medicine and that children should work and eat radon. Grow up.
I’d love to see a Josh Hawley “sporting event”
I didn’t realize grifting off the right wing mentally challenged required an AR 15
Watch them on youtube fool!
He’s a goofball
I'm living in central Europe, I am 60 now and have never seen a gun in person. I'm living my life without having the thought that I have to defend myself on a daily basis with some weapons. I know nobody who thinks her/his life depends on carrying a weapon. All these discussions to me sound extremely strange and unreal. Can you imagine that?
Same point I made too. So to those puzzling over it. Why is this?
Exactly, what are all these people so afraid of that they think they have to have guns, especially rapid-fire ones.
When you need a gun to defend your own home, you are living in a broken culture. In a war zone, yes. If not, you live in fear and that's sick.
Um 2020 Chicago, Police ordered not to stop hundreds burning cars and buildings heading towards us as police watched... Yea.. it sucked knowing our own gov would not help, it sucks that we do need these weapons to survive, it sucked it took 40 of us with ar-15's to deter an angry mob from entering our area... but that was our only option.. Sucks but it is a reality in Chicago ! The gov let them destroy anything they wanted... Us armed citizens didn't
@@Madmen604 sad truth but reality none the less. Its better to have the means to defend yourself and what’s important to you than to be at the mercy of those who intend to do you harm. It’s been that way for the longest.
SECOND AMENDMENT
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
1799 was a long time ago. Do you need more targets, because outlawing abortion will have that side effect?
@@douglemay7989 🤣 you a mindless bot
@@impulse2create What part of the militia are you? DUH!
@@douglemay7989 why did u delete your other comment
Sure Josh for "sporting events" that sounds like a legitimate reason. Hell in that case let's make RPG's/grenades available to the general public for "sporting events".
They are available stupid!
Sounds good to me
.....RPG's are available to the general public
Call your senators and Congressmen let them know that if they don't protect us and our children because they are beholden to nra, they need to be voted out. Make it very clear
AMEN!
Congress doesn't care. They are gerrymandered to the point they don't have to care.
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
Call, write, email EVERY DAY.
Make our elected officials our new pen pals.
Kids are to be protected! Stand up for them instead of yourselves!
Did that gentleman say , "good faith " in the same sentence as republican? There lies the problem.
u sound like a complete goofy.
I just wish one of them could be honest and say that the gun trade is a huge part of the economy and that people need guns to salve their fragile egos.
You just wish one of "who" ? could be honest ?
I guess over 60k defense uses a year of firearms is irrelevant to you...
that's literally just your opinion
When your constitution was written, the majority of these guns weren’t even thought of. The is nothing wrong with updating laws etc. If you don’t, America deserves whatever happens
You don't think the founding fathers who wrote one of the greatest documents in this history of the world didn't think that their muskets/blackpowder rifles wouldn't modernize as the years went by? Highly doubt it. AR-15 is only responsible for 1% of gun deaths In this country which is 48,000 gun deaths a year and handguns are responsible for 80% of these deaths. FBI statistics show that hands and feet kill more people than all rifles and shotguns combined including the AR-15.
That is the most coherent and wisest statement I've heard from Manchin in over 3 years.
Sadly, Will Joe hold this view tomorrow??? He flips and disappoints so frequently that you just can't take him at his word.
He won't support filibuster reform to make it happen, so he just lied to you.
Manchin is a two faced prick. He doesn't give af about anything except his mining business.
Like there's a buttload to choose from...
Let's be Honest we knew
ua-cam.com/video/Af4CzHlvN50/v-deo.html
A .22 single-shot used to be the standard Varmint gun.
Long gun
In what year was that?
@@jaymass1178 1939🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@12_3__i8
Haha. I think before that even. Lever action rifles started around 1837, pump action around 1887. Sure you can use a single shot still to this day, but who would?
@@jaymass1178 Of course! But I think it seems logical to offer a special Varmint permit to those who really need an AR to blow apart prairie dogs. Maybe they are useful to cull feral hogs, but not necessary for smaller critters.
The military has more restrictions on weapons than this shit out here.
How can we continue to allow this shit to happen to our children...
The U.S. Military took a oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution as did the President and Vice President. Law Enforcement took the same oath too.
Set down...get back in your seat!
Make stricter laws for using guns in a crime, for murder, etc. and enforce them. America's laxxed judicial system favors criminals vs victims. If you knew you'd get the death or life sentence and more importantly laws being enforced maybe we'd get more criminals off the streets.
That's a false.
How is a Stricter Law going to PHYSICALLY stop anyone? A Criminal is a person caught AFTER they committed the crime. They already did what they wanted to do.
In the old west towns like Dodge City, Abilene, and Wichita, in Kansas, just to name a few, Towns like Tucson, Bisby and Tombstone AZ. All these towns passed laws saying you had to check your fire arms in town, you were not allowed to carry weapons with in city limits, Now you want to pass laws saying pretty much anyone can carry a concealed weapon. Do you remember how lawless those old west towns were?
The gunfight at the OK corral had the good guys trying to disarm the bad guys. Remember how that turned out!!Before you had to check your guns the bad guys where usually better armed then the good guys. There is a reason we study history. It is so we don't make the same mistakes as we have in the past. Passing Back ground checks, red flag laws; and raising the age to own a gun is common sense. But because of greedy politicians and corporations, you won't even protect our own children?
Well said.
Good luck. Cognizant reasoning with Republicans or Nazis are the confederacy had its limits no I didn’t it?. They have put a chip on their shoulder and they are daring “law and order“ to knock it off.
We are dealing with assholes, and all we get is an unspoken “fuck you”.
THAT IS ABSOLUTELY ACCURATE.
The guns did not make them lawless, the sorts of people packed together shitfaced drunk with seeing no women for months at a time created a lot of tension. The most lawless old west towns look like a rest home compared to a weekend in Chicago.
@@skippyify No, America is not much worse. Certain urban areas in America are much worse and carry almost all of the gun violence (and violence in general) problems. Maybe we can take a look at those things and instead of complaining about symptoms, start getting to causes.
guns for sporting events? I think in every country that has sporting events including guns has a some organisation to manage those guns, No?
YES.
No. Anyone can do 3 gun events. Pistols, AR, shotgun.
@@jaymass1178 are yoou serious? can anyone just say "bring your gun to the event"? thats just stupid i wouldnt feel safe as an obserer especially in the US with those loose gun laws
@@Maxcraft-1000
What? It's a gun competition! If you don't want to go don't. I could care less how you "feel". I carry everywhere I go. I feel perfectly safe.
The AR 15 comes in caliber choices, and has nothing to do with the damage done. The bullet is primarily responsive for that. It looks intimidating, which is supposed to be a plus, but Democrat stupidity has turned it into a negative! A shotgun blast will do 10x the damage of an AR 15! But, trying to explain this to people who aren't interested in learning the truth, is really useless!
And a ar 15 will fire 10 bullets by the time U shoot a shotgun once or twice. Your truth is negative. 🙃
Not my AR15, like the constitution has a provision for semi autos.
They said well regulated militia at a time they had muzzleloaders.
All else is a lie.
Lewis and Clark had 25 shot repeating rifles back 300 years ago. Look it up in the history books
Well trained it means, not limited. It means good working order.
@@cajunstacker1376 The expedition was in 1804, that's 216 years ago, and those repeating rifles were lever action repeating rifles, not semiautomatics.
Republicans getting Paid big bucks and not giving a hoot about kids slain by this type gun. One day they will care
Right wing democrats take money from the nra too, not just republicans. Rich right winger pelosi just campaigned for a corrupt gun lobby incumbant in texas
I guess it should be a right to carry a small thermonuclear weapon under the second amendment if right wing readers of the constitution had their way.
I can see a new organization on the horizon. National Hand Grenade Association. "Grenades for personal safety."
(Said in sarcastic voice)
@Matt Manning man,that’s right on point. Carting a semi-auto on a subway??? Really.
@@mariegarside8830 I prefer the NNA - National Nuclear Association ;)
I decide what firearm is rite for me not the dam government. The way things are going in this country more citizens should by guns to protect the little freedom we have left. Personally I have had it with this dam administration and want them taken out of office yesterday
If they want to get themselves killed being stupid, unarmed and unprepared, I say let it be. Don't try to tell me or us what "we need or don't need" though. It's none of their GD business!
The radical left wing extremist not acknowledging the Constitution and 2ND Amendment is total BS. That is a impeachable offense and should be prosecuted for it.
“Stumbling over their words” says it all.
its a big business and these politicians need money from those business to keep their position. this is how i understand why they will never make changes about gun laws..
Yes, the NRA lobbyists who give them piles of money.
Maybe no civilian needs a military assault rifle.... Maybe that might be the problem 🙂
Let's be Honest we knew
ua-cam.com/video/Af4CzHlvN50/v-deo.html
maybe.... it is possible.... but I think they still arent sure and need more that...
no civilian needs a car that goes faster then 75...that also seems to be a problem...also theres no need for a civilian to decide their diet and die from health related issues...thats also a problem...y dont u care about crash victims or over weight people? are they not people who deserve justice as well and do these people not die just as frequently as gun violence victims...seems like theres just as equally bad issues out there and ur not calling for reform on...why?? not informed? dont care? just forgot?
It is not a military weapon. Even if it were your comment makes no since when the right to a gun is to fight against an invading military.
AR-15 is a civilian rifle not military. Learn the difference
The obstacle with Red Flag laws is lack of funding. If the court deems a person mentally unfit to own a gun, there is no place for that person to get the healthcare treatment they need. For the past 10-15 years, since the Great Recession of 06-07, states started cutting spending on mental health. And those levels didn't increase when the tax revenues increased. Instead, the state cut corporate and individual taxes.
Avoiding the killing of kids, not a priority.
Short of a zombie apocalypses, I fail to understand how any one would need an AR-15 for anything. It doesn't take one to kill small rodents unless you're a horrible shot... and then maybe we should question if you need a gun at all.
@@brewed_for_success As he mentioned: Which advantage would an AR15 give you over a, say bol-action rifle?
Right? Why would anyone even need a firearm with more than 1 round?
Didn't matter. The AR15 is not the problem. You can do just as much damage with a 22 handgun.
Control is the issue.
Control and the stupidity of voters that keep voting in idiots like Cruz, Greene, and Trump.
@@boost77071 if you knew anything you would know that ar style rifles are used in self-defense more than any other firearm. That's why we need more than one shot
@@MistedMind ar 15 style rifles is the most common rifle used in self-defense. Tell me what you would rather have in a home invasion situation a bolt action or a semi auto rifle?
There’s no mention of “need” in the second amendment. I decide what I need or want.
why do i need an ar 15? why do i need a car that can go 150 mph? a) because im allowed to own one b) you never know when youll need it
I think it's pretty simple. If you had a choice of what car to get; would you get a Ford Fusion or a Maserati? People get AR-15s because they can.
Let's be Honest we knew
ua-cam.com/video/Af4CzHlvN50/v-deo.html
could I get an Alfa Romeo or Citröen or can I just choose those two?
@David Wang The correlation is about choice. It’s not about cars versus guns. If you don’t get the analogy; that’s on you.
In the military we are taught “one shot, one kill”. Its very rare we would go from semi to burst. If you’re doing that you’re in a world of shyt. No reason for civilians to have these weapons.
Which weapons are you referring to?
Stolen Valor over here
Well then you were taught wrong little buddy
@@thehatefull1761 Oorah!
Citizens don't have 3 burst guns ( m-16;s)
nobody needs an AR-15s. But it looks so coooool.and makes the impotent feel potent
It's called the Bill of Rights... not the Bill of Needs.
Immature childless statement.
@@marks5336 why?I bet you take your AR-15s to bed
@@marks5336 why? i bet you take your AR-15 to bed
To deal with the violent thugs in front of Kavanaghs house.
1 mac scrambles Fuk what you saying it here 😠 ua-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/v-deo.html
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
These negotiations for so little change - pathetic and spineless. Makes me ill
This is the biggest load of crap excuses I have ever heard. The only reason to own a semi automatic weapon is to hunt people or destroy property. You do not hunt with these. If you shoot a prairie dog with one of these there will be nothing left of the prairie dog. If you are so sick that demolishing a prairie dog gets you off enough to pay for the ammo to do this then you have no business owning any weapon. I worked as an on site scale operator and nightwatchman out in the middle of the desert. Every weekend drunks, their kids and dogs would come to our gravel pit and blow the windows out of our heavy equipment with semi automatic weapons while their kids were crawling all over the equipment the drunks were firing at. Semi automatic weapons do not belong in the hands of civilians period. End of freaking discussion.
@@joea9608 And the republican party sounds exactly like hitler. Trump achieved his goal.
You know nothing about which you speak is it too late for you to be aborted
I dont know how to even respond to such abject stupidity
@Tanya Strieff , not hardly. I know about guns. I know how semi autos work I know what kind of of damage they do ,how fast they fire and I am very likely a much better shot than you will ever be. Semi automatic weapons do NOT belong in the hands of civilians.
Plenty of people hunt with the AR15. I took a 13 point Buck this past season with mine. AR's are perfect for hunting.
The plain answer is: they don´t need those!!
I don't need 3 TVs or a 1,500 cell phone either. But I want them.
@Teutonic Nordwind ,people with childlike mentality like you are the least people that should have access to any gun. You can´t handle guns! You would be a danger to other peoples lives if you were equipeed with a pop gun,if your mother will ever risk buying you one!!!
@@jimmyjames6487 ,yeah,that´s fair enough. But TVs don´t massacre 19 children in their schools! TVs and cellphones also doesn´t cause 1900 mass shootings that America has had only in the last 8 years! Taste that number! One can´t get everything one wants, all the time!
@@stonefree67 pretty sure if I drop a TV in a swimming pool full of people I can electrocute all of them.
Why do people need cars that go 160 mph ? For the same reason they want an AR-15
It's not the Government or radical extremists place to tell you what you can and can't buy with your own money.
The Gop's stance on gun safety laws are absurd and unjust.
“If you can convince a man to believe absurdities you can convince him to commit atrocities.” Voltaire
The right to self defense is the most basic of all human rights.
@@civilization57 i won't feel safe until i can take my assault tank to Walmart. Its our constitutional right
@@civilization57 what chance do school children have then.....😬
@@civilization57 And the best defense, is to take guns away.
@@ClassicGamingPortal but not your human right.
If any of these politicians knew anything about guns, they offer to trade some meaningful legislation to get ride of the NFA which restricts suppressors and SBRs. The length of a barrel and a reduction of 15-20db does nothing for safety and gun owners hate the hassle.
They make a lot of money by restricting them though.
"Constitutional right to bear arms" So why can't ordinary American citizens bear rocket launchers? Surface to air missiles? Tanks? Fighter jets? Because they happen to be weapons of war. For military use only.
American citizens CAN own rocket launchers, tanks, fighter jets, and almost everything else... even a canon, despite what Mr. Potato Head says.
Govt officials have power,, and they use it ag trusting, busy, distracted, or naive citizens? Illogical brush off answers given, defending indefensible need for citizens to own AR 15, easily converted full auto rifles. Hunting? Hardly a sport, to mow down defenseless animals w machine guns? Why do responsible grown up need more than, say, semi auto, 8 round rifle for hunting or defense, same as ordinary soldier of WW11?. Gun manuf, and lobbyists have to be morally accountable?
why the need to have military war rifle at home?no good for hunting or other thing than when you're in war situation..,
They are great for hunting they are fun to ,shoot, ammo is cheap and they aren't a MILITARY weapon, they have never been used on the battle field
And they aren't getting banned/confiscated 😊
@@Doc_Holiday And, dead kids are quite a turn-on for you, eh?
@@Doc_Holiday really never understood how anyone gets pleasure from killing wild animals. One of the indicators of a psychopathic personality is a history of torturing and killing animals. The American obsession with teaching their children to hunt, may go a long way to explaining why so many American children exhibit psychopathic tendencies.
It is a lack of compassion, and empathy, for the potential victim that allows a teenager to shot a young child at point blank range in the face.
Americans are reaping what they sow.
AR is NOT a military rifle. We don't send those to Ukraine.
@@dantepearl4186 too busy using them to kill each other at home I guess.
This morning I heard one of the people who were first in the classroom at Uvalde. He said the cell phones on the dead bodies were still ringing from parents trying to reach their kids. All so someone can plunk prairie dogs and feel all tingly at the gun range?
even the idea of hunting anything with these guns is absurd, as the meat would not be edible.
it's kind of like throwing a bomb, from what i'm understanding.
Yep. Cell phones do ring when someone is calling.
We don't have to explain our constitutional rights.
@@jamtommy6446 You do have to honor them responsibly. As a split party ticket voter, meaning I vote candidate and issues -- not party affiliation, I say, I began hunting in the 1970s...hey, you, don't be a dumb-as$. Support responsible laws and regulations regarding gun control. An 18 year old doesn't need an AR- or AK-.
@@faithnelson6069 depends on the ammo, but the 5.56 ammo the mass shooters are using works like a bomb inside a body, causing shock waves that do much of the very extensive damage.
Right to bear arms! so the GOP is okay with me buying a rocket launcher? oh wait the NRA doesn't promote it so it's not okay but an AR-15 is a necessity? Both are categorized as a weapon of war and shouldn't be in the hand's anyone especially not a young man that just turned 18. Ask yourself why don't patrol officers carry such weapons like an AR-15? But the SWAT team does, an escalation unit specializes in using it so why would that privilege go to regular citizens without any training and special handling? The GOP logic and rationale are beyond incomprehensible!
We have the right to protect ourselves, friends, family, our country, and overthrow tyrannical government
So....You can't do all that with a bolt action or pump or lever? You must be a terrible shot.
@@TJ-fe7rr it's easier to use a semi automatic rifle to do it than a fucking bolt action rifle
Nowhere in the construction says it has to be an AR-15 👀
Doesn't say it can't be either.
“I need an AR-15 because there are guys out there running around with AR-15s and I need to protect myself from guys with AR-15s”…part of the problem not part of the solution.
Guns don’t kill people. Psychos do.
Run around with a Glock. No difference.
@@thomasjohn6041 You’re right. Both the AR-15 and the Glock only have one function, to kill people. It doesn’t matter who’s hands they are in, sane or psycho, that function doesn’t change.
@@georgenewlands9760 sane people don’t go around killing other people.
So, yeah it does matter.
Why do people need ar 15s? Because its slightly less humiliating than asking for Viagra
🤣🤣🤣
@Teutonic Nordwind How did that work out when tRump was causing an insurrection? I didn't see many fighting his tyranny!
Give an inch and they will take a foot i see how they try to chip away your rights
Somebody needs round up these loons , lock them up and throw away the key.
Democrat = Domestic terrorist and National threat!
My nephew who basically grew up in the country with guns had an opportunity to go to New York with my son and was really concerned that he couldn't bring a gun with him because he believed that New York was a very unsafe place and during his visit without a gun of course said that he was surprised how safe and beautiful the city was and didn't need his gun and that was 5 years ago and simple perception is amazing how it makes people act
5 years ago lmao
Oh so he made it 5 days without getting mugged. So what about the other 360 days.
Yes, under Trump America was a much better place
LIAR, PROVE THIS really happened! And if it did tell us EXACTLY where and WHEN he went. Going from his hotel room to the hotel bar does not count! Nor does walking down main street during the day...
5 years ago….
Majority of people against "AR" don't even know what AR stands for or even the difference between a clip and a magazine.
The problem is New York does not consider self-defense a good enough reason when applying for a handgun permit. That's a fairly important omission...
Sporting events? What sporting event uses a AR15? Or any automatic rifle.
AR15s aren't a "automatic rifle'.....U.S. Military M16/M4s are.