Fastest Passenger Aircraft of All Time Top Speed Comparison 3D

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 чер 2023
  • How fast is Taylor Swift private jet ?
    How fast is Elon Musk private jet ?
    Fastest Passenger Planes of All Time Top Speed Comparison 3D
    𝗙𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗚
    Lockheed L-2000
    Boeing 2707
    Tupolev TU 144
    Concorde
    Boom Supersonic
    Aerion AS2
    Douglas DC8
    Airbus A380
    Cessna Citation X+
    Gulfstream G650
    Boeing 747-100
    Dassault Falcon 7X
    Boeing 787
    Bombardier Global 6000
    Dassault Falcon 900
    Boeing 747 8
    Dassault Falcon 900
    Boeing 777
    Boeing 727
    Bombardier CRJ 1000
    Convair 990 Coronado
    Boeing 747-400
    L-1011 TriStar
    Convair 880
    Tu-154
    Boeing 737-800
    Hawker-Siddeley Trident 2
    Gulfstream G550
    Vickers VC10
    Airbus A330-200
    BAe 146
    Cessna Citation CJ3
    Ilyushin IL-62M
    Tu-204
    BAC One-Eleve
    𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂
    Whitesand - Vision- Inspirational Piano Music
    Whitesand - Fireflies 2
    Whitesand - My Spirit Is Free
    Check out Whitesand Channel
    / whitesandcomposer
    𝟑𝐃 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬
    - own creations
    - 3D Warehouse (Awesome)
    Per section 1.B.ii of the 3D Warehouse TOC - "Combined Work"
    Like, Share and Subscribe to 𝗔𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗩𝗶𝘇
    www.amazingviz.net/​
    Help me Grow this Channel
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 149

  • @dotdashdotdash
    @dotdashdotdash Рік тому +75

    Concorde was the most successful SST

    • @adastra7939
      @adastra7939 Рік тому +8

      Though it wasn’t as economical or fuel efficient.

    • @georgevavoulis4758
      @georgevavoulis4758 Рік тому +2

      It was the OY one built and put into actual service. If American Congress allowed Boeing 2707 and Lockheed L-2000 it would be a much better world today . Lockheed had better easy to build and less expensive design

    • @mythicscientific7326
      @mythicscientific7326 Рік тому +2

      Super Sonic Travel?

    • @spazzey0
      @spazzey0 Рік тому

      @@georgevavoulis4758
      "...and that's where Lockheed" has never been more fitting, *they get things done* .

    • @Emi_LDA
      @Emi_LDA Рік тому +1

      ⁠@@adastra7939 It was glamorous

  • @mikemines2931
    @mikemines2931 Рік тому +28

    The VC10 was much quicker than that even at 45,000 ft in a cyclone over Java.

  • @tjhomie728
    @tjhomie728 Рік тому +36

    I didn't even know the DC-8 flew supersonic

  • @simonsv9449
    @simonsv9449 11 місяців тому +8

    5:45 Who could have known that the DC-8 was this fast!

    • @Altenholz
      @Altenholz 7 місяців тому

      Provided, that it was!

  • @user-sl9ni9xv5y
    @user-sl9ni9xv5y Рік тому +9

    Боинг 2707 и Локхид 2000 никогда не существовали и не летали. Так что я думаю ту 144 был и остается самым быстрым пассажирским самолетом.

  • @VietnamLemone
    @VietnamLemone Рік тому +3

    First! Also really nice vid

  • @leeoldershaw956
    @leeoldershaw956 Рік тому +6

    Hardly anything in this video is correct and many were never built. Claptrap!

  • @atilllathehun1212
    @atilllathehun1212 Рік тому +10

    A380 -Mach 0.96.... What drugs are you on.......

    • @sierra6993
      @sierra6993 Рік тому +1

      The A380 can go 1185.41 km/h, which is roughly mach 0.96. You’re the one on drugs here

    • @atilllathehun1212
      @atilllathehun1212 Рік тому +1

      @@sierra6993 Official Aitbus figure Mach 0.85

    • @sierra6993
      @sierra6993 Рік тому

      @@atilllathehun1212 that’s the cruising speed, this video is about max speed

    • @greenesyt563
      @greenesyt563 Рік тому +3

      ​@@sierra6993 1185.41 kmph is just the ground speed you're the one with drugs

    • @greenesyt563
      @greenesyt563 Рік тому

      ​@@atilllathehun1212 0.85 is the normal cruising speed and 0.89 is the mmo.

  • @michaelmcguire9749
    @michaelmcguire9749 Рік тому +4

    Convair 880 did not have pods on top of the wings, only the 990 did.

  • @monsieurchevrebois9811
    @monsieurchevrebois9811 Рік тому +3

    The DH.121 Trident was introduced with a Mno of 0.88 with a critical Mach number of 0.93. The VC10 normally cruised at .84 however in RAF service, 0.94 was achievable if you were not concerned about fuel consumption.

  • @rcinpact4480
    @rcinpact4480 Рік тому +1

    That’s cool!

  • @MrIlia-xc5kx
    @MrIlia-xc5kx Рік тому +5

    Concorde❤

  • @coconuttyyy
    @coconuttyyy 6 місяців тому +1

    Some people here seem confused let me clear this up, most of the fastest that these planes have flown is because of crashes, steep stalls, etc.

  • @user-if4cz1uv6n
    @user-if4cz1uv6n Рік тому +2

    很👍的影片🎉🎉😊😊

  • @pleyades1711
    @pleyades1711 Рік тому +3

    The A330-200 and the G550 MMO (top speed)is 0.86 and 0.88 respectively and even the 737-800 it’s one I fly irl and it’s 0.82. stopped to watch the video at that point

  • @moshermw
    @moshermw Рік тому +2

    At least because it set several speed records, the 707 should be mentioned and it cruised at Mach 0.9ish, putting it in the second highest tier as shown.

  • @wrhw3340
    @wrhw3340 Рік тому +2

    the video was good but I missed the embraer planes.

  • @ravejet8763
    @ravejet8763 Рік тому +4

    A330-200's cruise speed is Mach 0.82.

  • @OlizerVanAntoninus
    @OlizerVanAntoninus Рік тому +4

    The convair and vc10 were two of the fastest non supersonic jets.

  • @rajkumarsharma4927
    @rajkumarsharma4927 Рік тому +1

    Nice 😍 video

  • @raymondttompson2638
    @raymondttompson2638 Рік тому

    You might want to check the passenger figures on the Trident 2e.

  • @vagneresteves1945
    @vagneresteves1945 Рік тому +2

    where are embraer models?

  • @therealiroquoisball
    @therealiroquoisball Рік тому +2

    So it seems the Tupolev Tu-144 is the fastest passenger plane to date.

    • @busofmauritius8306
      @busofmauritius8306 Рік тому +3

      Concorde reached a top speed more than that, but it was only during tests. They limited the speed to mach 2.04 for maximum efficiency and save on fuel over trans-atlantic crossing. TU-144 only wanted the first place on the top speed list but Concorde aim was to maximise efficiency. Boeing 2707 could've been faster but they found that it was not going to be a sustainable investment and invested the money in the 747 program which has been a great success and that was one of the best decisions they ever made.

    • @concordegaming5037
      @concordegaming5037 11 місяців тому

      @@busofmauritius8306And I’d assume that because the 2707 was originally proposed to have swing wings, it would be a maintenance nightmare similar to the F-14, but several times larger

  • @YULspotter2
    @YULspotter2 11 місяців тому +1

    The Bombardier Global 8000 is missing. It's the fastest business jet to date. It's capable of cruising at MACH 0.94. In flight testing it went beyond MACH 1.

  • @mukulpanwar1046
    @mukulpanwar1046 Рік тому +4

    Just like all of your other videos this one's amazing and i really got to learn more about the fast airliners!!! But you forgot to include the Ye-115 (MiG-25 business jet)

    • @masol3726
      @masol3726 Рік тому +1

      Can you please include real life pictures next to the planes or beside the text??? Pleaseee

    • @APerson-fj6yx
      @APerson-fj6yx Рік тому

      @MASOL you can’t put pictures on UA-cam comments

  • @fbello18
    @fbello18 11 місяців тому +1

    The subsonic passenger ever bulir plane was the Convair 990A Coronado
    My father always told the story he once was crusing at high altitude, and the plane - in a particular circunstance - aproached very close to sound speed. The plane start shaking !! - those planes are not projected to do it - the structure eventually colapse. He had to slow the throtles

  • @Thurgosh_OG
    @Thurgosh_OG Рік тому +1

    The top row only has three real operational aircraft. The others are proposed or cancelled projects, so not valid entries on this list.

  • @taylormjolsness7480
    @taylormjolsness7480 Місяць тому

    Real fight simulator should add the DC-8

  • @solarroller09
    @solarroller09 11 місяців тому +1

    Amazing man
    That was awesome bro coool
    Thanks

    • @AmazingViz
      @AmazingViz  11 місяців тому

      Thank you too! 😁

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 11 місяців тому

      @@AmazingVizthis video you made is complete BS. Most of the speeds are completely incorrect.

  • @waineyteixeira
    @waineyteixeira Рік тому +3

    I didn't like. Embraer aircraft are not present 🇧🇷. And look, there are many models...

  • @batterypacks
    @batterypacks 11 місяців тому +2

    0:24 did they just copy the 757

  • @vistalite-ph4zw
    @vistalite-ph4zw Рік тому

    I wish the SST programs stuck around, would have been interesting to see other SST entries in operation. Maybe by 2030 a new generation of SSTs will be in operation...

  • @APerson-fj6yx
    @APerson-fj6yx Рік тому +2

    The reason there is not any Embraer models here (I saw the comments) is most likely due to them being small and or being of similar and same speed. It wouldn’t make sense if they were included. That’s like including every single jet aircraft in this vid, just too much content for this quick video

  • @larrybremer4930
    @larrybremer4930 Рік тому +1

    the SCA (747-100) pictured could not do M 0.92, it was actually significantly slower than a standard 747-100 which I believe had a maximum cruise speed of M 0.83 in pretty much every variant. Are these figures the max design speeds or the critical mach number (not to exceed speed)?

  • @dvx4861
    @dvx4861 Рік тому +2

    👍

  • @Ilovethe737
    @Ilovethe737 3 місяці тому +1

    Convair 990A

  • @soloperformer5598
    @soloperformer5598 11 місяців тому +1

    I presumed you meant planes which were or had been in service and not just someone's idea.

  • @geoffreyking4515
    @geoffreyking4515 Рік тому +1

    V C 10 ,elegant fast ,class

  • @oscaramorim7234
    @oscaramorim7234 Рік тому

    🚀

  • @tarcisofrancisco1391
    @tarcisofrancisco1391 Рік тому +3

    Convair 880ft !!! O Elvis Presley sabia disso...😂

  • @arashramezani8535
    @arashramezani8535 Рік тому

    How about the 747SP?

  • @Evanster1212
    @Evanster1212 2 місяці тому +1

    I came here for Concorde

  • @user-wj6wk6db6h
    @user-wj6wk6db6h 11 місяців тому

    Fun fact: air Koryo is the last airline to use the ilyushin il-62M

  • @matthiasweidmann8135
    @matthiasweidmann8135 11 місяців тому +1

    By far the fastest is the Concorde. It was the safest way to travel super sonic.

  • @99ZondaS
    @99ZondaS Рік тому +1

    The Convair 990s actual top speed was mach 0.87

  • @scottphillipson5315
    @scottphillipson5315 11 місяців тому +1

    Surely a passenger plane needs to have carried fee paying passengers ?? Otherwise by the definition of a plane and a passenger the shuttle would be the fastest passenger plane as it flew, had wings and carried passengers other than the pilot ? Some of these are concepts

  • @busofmauritius8306
    @busofmauritius8306 Рік тому +2

    Where is Boeing 720? Quicker than DC-8. For DC-8 you included the top speed ever reached. Concorde top speed ever reached was mach 2.19.

  • @robjustil8722
    @robjustil8722 Рік тому +2

    French air force presentation?

  • @Perich29
    @Perich29 4 місяці тому

    I wish Boeing 2707 SST would have took flight, it would be a passenger F 14 tomcat.

  • @abeljr9197
    @abeljr9197 Рік тому

    It's missing several other airplanes, such as some regional jets.

  • @beijingbond
    @beijingbond Рік тому

    Why include aircraft that were never built? It makes no sense when the title is 'Fastest Passenger Planes of All Time' and not 'Fastest Passenger Planes of All Time including those never built'.

  • @ricardogutierrez2006
    @ricardogutierrez2006 6 місяців тому

    How fast is the Tupelev Tu-104

  • @taopinairlinesmathindustry9144

    is this measured by airspeed or groundspeed

  • @RickS2R
    @RickS2R 11 місяців тому +1

    You show a 990 for the 880 image and the 990 is faster than the 727...where did you get your data and fact checking?

  • @gzk6nk
    @gzk6nk 11 місяців тому

    Several of these were paper aeroplanes that never flew so did M0.0 (e,g, Boeing SST). Concorde was M2.02, not 2.04. And the DC8 supersonic? Don't be silly! What about the Trident and VC10?

  • @theoneandonlypopsicle
    @theoneandonlypopsicle Рік тому

    4:35 , the 747-1 carried the space shuttle???

  • @warjacare
    @warjacare Рік тому

    Where are Airbus 320, Embraer, Bombardier etc....?

  • @BB-dp4kh
    @BB-dp4kh Рік тому

    The fast of all...the USS Enterprise NCC-1701D had a maximum speed of warp 9.2...

    • @concordegaming5037
      @concordegaming5037 11 місяців тому

      Yeah, but that’s not real. All of the ones in here are either real or proposed designs

  • @russellbenton2987
    @russellbenton2987 11 місяців тому

    I got fed up with this , so skipped forward , but I thought the VC10 and DC 8 had gone Supersonic or very close on dives . A;so weren’t the Convair Jetliners the fastest of their time Aldo approaching Mach 1

  • @skynorden
    @skynorden 11 місяців тому

    tu154m M0.82-0.83

  • @benredburn
    @benredburn 3 місяці тому

    the g550 flies way faster than mach 0.76. you have underreported most of these airliners speeds.

  •  11 місяців тому

    HS121 Trident only takes 19 passengers? It has more windows than seats.

  • @davigustavo5286
    @davigustavo5286 Рік тому +1

    Cadê o cace 370.

  • @bombud1
    @bombud1 Рік тому +1

    planes that never flew shouldn't be on the list.

  • @davigustavo5286
    @davigustavo5286 Рік тому +1

    Ops e cace 360, eu acho😅😅😅

  • @peterhoare3754
    @peterhoare3754 Рік тому

    Why include aircraft that never flew?

  • @mitchellgoetz8014
    @mitchellgoetz8014 3 місяці тому

    Evergreen 747 am I joke to you

  • @user-dt6xm6pt7r
    @user-dt6xm6pt7r 11 місяців тому +1

    Tu-154M ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹🤍

  • @MENSA.lady2
    @MENSA.lady2 Рік тому

    A DC8 mat Mach 1. Thats guaranteed to rip the wings off.
    Of academic interest as today speed is limited by ATC requirements. Only if your aircraft can cruise higher than 45000 feet can you exceed about M.84.

    • @monsieurchevrebois9811
      @monsieurchevrebois9811 Рік тому

      Not so, above 10,000 feet, you can go as fast as you are permitted by ATC. Even below 10,000 feet, 250 kts is "flexible" as you can be given an unrestricted departure. A DC-8 in a dive would experience mach buffet but the wings would probably keep pace with the rest of the aircraft.

    • @rtbrtb_dutchy4183
      @rtbrtb_dutchy4183 11 місяців тому

      There is no M.84 max speed. You can fly whatever u want above 10000 ft. (Subsonic speeds)

  • @stuartmiller7419
    @stuartmiller7419 Рік тому +2

    A few 'wishful thinking' planes in there at the top. Also, Concorde did the job;Tu-144 didn't. Great video, all the same. Thanks.

  • @sargentofoxy5487
    @sargentofoxy5487 Рік тому

    1:04 :..... 1771.....

  • @toriyshaov2245
    @toriyshaov2245 Рік тому

    Tu-154 - 0.86M

  • @edgarmurungi163
    @edgarmurungi163 Рік тому

    787 and A350?

  • @nanansema8741
    @nanansema8741 Рік тому +14

    Mach 1 for the DC-8 ? You smoke drug ?

    • @AmazingViz
      @AmazingViz  Рік тому +2

      Wikipedia 😂

    • @nanansema8741
      @nanansema8741 Рік тому +3

      @@AmazingViz on Wikipedia I see 946 km/h (Mach 0,77)

    • @datathunderstorm
      @datathunderstorm Рік тому +4

      The DC8 is the only passenger airliner known to have genuinely broken the sound barrier. This was an actual event, not a myth. True, this happened on a flight with no passengers and was achieved while the aircraft was in a shallow dive from a high altitude, the sound barrier was nonetheless broken and the aircraft flew faster than sound for 16 seconds before they pulled out of the dive and resumed normal flight parameters.

    • @nanansema8741
      @nanansema8741 Рік тому +3

      @@datathunderstorm not the only passenger airliner, they are Concorde and Tu-144. But this is the only who wasn't made for supersonic flight

    • @mofleh177
      @mofleh177 Рік тому +2

      @@datathunderstorm Most aircrafts can break the sound barrier in a dive. This shouldn't be considered in this list as other aircrafts here have their top speed that can be achieved consistently in a leveled flight under typical operational load and conditions!

  • @Japan-in-N
    @Japan-in-N 11 місяців тому

    We’re you drunk when you collated these facts?

  • @Kertas_XD
    @Kertas_XD 11 місяців тому

    2:55 Ada maskapai indo ges 😮

  • @maxinfly
    @maxinfly 11 місяців тому

    BTW TU-154 M 0.88 not 0.77

  • @D.-wl3nu
    @D.-wl3nu 11 місяців тому

    Dc-8, hmmmmmmmm

  • @zaitonmat1026
    @zaitonmat1026 Рік тому

    787 leave the chat

  • @rubikfan1
    @rubikfan1 4 місяці тому

    There are slower classes than this with prop planes

  • @zaitonmat1026
    @zaitonmat1026 Рік тому

    787 mach 0.90

  • @BobMuskFan
    @BobMuskFan Рік тому +3

    America has the best passenger planes, Europe is not even close.

    • @sierra6993
      @sierra6993 Рік тому +2

      Bro is really expecting to be taken seriously💀

    • @tarikwildman
      @tarikwildman Рік тому +3

      That´s why Airbus is taking over. You forgot to mention the 737 Max btw

  • @user-qr7ex4rt1b
    @user-qr7ex4rt1b Рік тому

    ту 134 забыл

  • @monsieurchevrebois9811
    @monsieurchevrebois9811 Рік тому

    A380 Mach 0.96 and a Mach 1.0 DC-8 ???????????

  • @s-lowlife1452
    @s-lowlife1452 Рік тому

    Just comment

  • @AREMUP
    @AREMUP Рік тому

    I have a question,what is that MACH and 1Mach=? km 💀

    • @Bohdan_Medvedskyy
      @Bohdan_Medvedskyy Рік тому +2

      This is the true sonic speed at flight altitude. At see level 1224 km/h, at 11 000 m - 1062, up to 20000 m.

    • @keystonedriving8180
      @keystonedriving8180 Рік тому

      Interesting that you include 3 aircraft which have never existed, which renders the whole exercise a total waste of time.

  • @user-mx4qo6pq1m
    @user-mx4qo6pq1m 10 місяців тому

    Airbus is missing.

  • @khalidnazer3905
    @khalidnazer3905 Рік тому +1

    Some of these figures are not correct

  • @azkapradipta5792
    @azkapradipta5792 11 місяців тому

    ada indonesia cuyy

  • @AntonioRodrigues-nk3bq
    @AntonioRodrigues-nk3bq Рік тому

    Embraer??????

  • @the_professional_bros
    @the_professional_bros 10 місяців тому

    Technically the fake concorde won (you know which one i mean)
    Because the top 2 where never built

  • @tsr207
    @tsr207 16 днів тому

    Is the Boeing 2707 still in a church?

  • @dmansf49ers71
    @dmansf49ers71 11 місяців тому +1

    5:04 REALLY???!!!🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

  • @ChrisZoomER
    @ChrisZoomER 11 місяців тому

    I knew it, I knew the A380 is the fastest non-SST of all time! The DC-8 doesn't really count because it only broke the sound barrier while in a dive!

    • @emmanuelatiegha9049
      @emmanuelatiegha9049 11 місяців тому +1

      That is the theoritical structural speed; meaning at what speed the structure can withstand before it destroys itself. The true level flight speed is far lower, it shouldn't even be on the list

    • @ChrisZoomER
      @ChrisZoomER 11 місяців тому

      @@emmanuelatiegha9049 Then why do I see A380s on flight trackers indicating their "TAS" as those speeds for hours on end?
      Unless of course every flight tracker I've ever used was broken to the point that they nearly always glitched out.
      Wait, if my flight trackers are indeed faulty, then why do pilots and aerospace engineers always tell me that the A380 flies at those speeds when I ask them to give me its true specs?
      I guess they could all be blatantly lying to me, but why would they feel the need to lie?
      Okay, I could've just misunderstood what they said meaning that they weren't lying at all.
      So asked for very precise clarification and I asked if I was interpreting what they were saying correctly. They said I understood them spot on, some even said I got an A+ on my understanding of what they relayed to me.
      I just don't understand...

  • @Ultimate747CAT
    @Ultimate747CAT 11 місяців тому

    Dc-8 was that fast

  • @alex-bx7yj
    @alex-bx7yj Рік тому

    No Embraer in the list???