At the exact moment he felt he was losing control he asked you to step out of the vehicle. That was a pathetic attempt I assert himself, he thought you would just jump out 😂 bless him
They want you out of the vehicle and into there's. The psychology behind it, is you feel like a prisoner. You will say and do anything they ask, to get back out of there vehicle.
@@Ai_Mindz Thats why i wrote that it is the start of one - to start to enter into an agreement that they are in charge is to start to contract with their "authority"
About time!! An auditor who won’t put up with shite. A few of the new guys are far too friendly with them so why bother.....please please please go after the gang badge thugs...it's disgusting and divisive......Wayne Couzens wore his badge with pride.. Go for it.... Good Luck and Respect.
Couldn’t agree more. They are FAR too friendly and don’t seem switched on enough to pick up on the covert manipulation tactics UK police use which is always passive aggressive, victim blaming, copsplaining and if all that fails, intimidation. I often find myself cringing when they don’t pick up on it or so quickly forget and forgive how badly they were just being treated once the officers start trying to minimise their actions by being all matey matey with them. It’s embarrassing and I feel does more damage than good.
One of the first rules when trying to help someone ( the old man ) is not to endanger yourselves or others. Driving down the wrong way on a one way street is dangerous.
Any amount of money that is paid to the police is already too much. The police is the enforcement arm of the State and the State has no right to exist.
Yeah, as per usual, what they are going to is so important they feel justified in endangering the public, but then someone hurting their feelings takes priority? The only conclusion to be made is they think their feelings are more important than the suicidal person 😢
"Never argue with idiots, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". - Mark Twain. In this case you managed to bruise the most delicate item in the world, a Policeman's ego.
They don't know the law and they certainly don't care about it and think they are above it as well. They hate answering questions but love to repeat themselves. Of course I have subbed and belled and I'll be sure to share your channel. Loved it how you shut that first copper down.
Exactly. Acts, stautes and legislations that have no connection to actual laws, which are a natural state, are nothing more than man made rules. As long as you dont violate rights, nor cause harm or loss, or threaten harm or loss to person or property without consent, you have broken no law, only breached a man made rule. And there is NO LAW which states that, as free human beings, we have to obey any rule created by another
Way too many Police think they are above the Law , driving in a dangerous fashion without further care and attention is still a offence even for the Police
True but the Courts have ruled in their favour that are able to lie to the members of the public the shit they belt is disgusting to even listen to this is why people have to video record these bastards they make up rubbish as they go along they are literally pathological compulsive bullshitters there are reasons why no member of the public trusts them they make examples of them going after people or looking for people like they go on about is the most utter bollocks I have heard in a million years they come when a person is half dead or buried and the incident has long happened and the perpetrator has long gone and disappeared my friend's neighbour had his house burgled not about half a year ago and not one police officer came out to assist his neighbour they came a week after the incident had happened and his possessions were long gone and taken
@@stuartappleton2158 Can a police officer be the victim of a public order offence? In DPP v Orum [1989] 1 WLR 88, [1988] 3 All ER 449, [1989] 88 Cr App R 261 the Divisional Court confirmed that police officers are not unable to be victims of section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 caused by swearing and other abusive/threatening behaviour
DPP v Orum states behaviour( excessive), they the police are not used to being subjected to. The word "excessive " is the key, all the precious little wall flowers have to say is,"boo hoo, I was mortally offended", the act( DPP /Orum) , built them a back door escape route......
Never hand ya license over mate. They are only entitled to view it mate. Keep ya windows closed and hold ya licence up to the window and don’t answer any questions they ask you at all. Good video.
We should educate people to not be scared of humans in uniform and never talk to them. That means by telling it very polite to them: I`m not discussing my day and I˙m I free to go. Keep them accountable, from Slovenia.
yep , 3 helmets in a row ! something that a few of us are trying to kick back on ,is the fact the plod are armed with tazers and cs gas ,which is a breach of our peace ! Looking into that problem ! as there was no public dissoder !Cheers ! from Cornwall !!
@@paullancaster7066 They need to follow, and it usually is part of the 163 protocol to obtain them Stasi style, with Section 164 which demands details under law.
*groans at pun* Unfortunately, they are allowed to. They can break road traffic rules without their blues and twos, in the duty of their job, IF it would be counter productive to use the lights and sirens. So if they were covertly following someone they could break rules to stay with them without their lights on because obviously turning them on would draw attention. My guess is that a suicidal person is the go to answer for them in this situation as they can say the lights/sirens would panic them and cause them to jump off the bridge. They were probably rushing to Mc D's.
They could if it wasn't a danger. They aren't limited by the law saying not too, but they are limited by their obligation not to cause a danger to others or themselves. Wrong way down a 1 way street is hard to justify because people won't be expecting it.
All auditors take note, a prerequisite of conducting any successful audit is rapid fire response by maintaining questioning until answered, do not waver, hold them accountable until they "confess".
Why does everyone always think we Scots are “aggressive”. We’re assertive and forthright, that doesn’t make us aggressive. Love your work TLA, one of my many inspirations for starting my own auditing channel.
Once again, they don't know the laws they're supposedly upholding and suffering from bruised, fragile egos that make them think that no laws apply to them. Personally, I would've been tempted to drive straight into them.
Spot on my man. ALL blue light training teaches every single blue light vehicle has to operate within the law of the roads. Fire engines and ambulances travel at the speed for the road with lights on it allows progression through traffic. Police are not exempt regardless of excuse. The only idiots to do as they please
We still live in a free country and have freedom of speech. You can use any type of colourful language you like and your right to use it is protected. It only becomes a public order offence when threatening words or behaviour are use which are likely to cause fear, harassment or alarm to a member of the public, not a police officer. Police are "supposed" to be highly trained professionals, who are expected to deal with the most unsavoury of our society. They are presumed to be able to cope with foul language, criticises of their behaviour and even verbal threats, without getting their panties in a bunch!!!!
fictitious they make up so much shit and garbage I don't believe for a second they were looking for anyone if they were they wouldn't have stopped the driver they would have gone after the guy they were looking for
Even though the police are in the wrong here and was made aware of that by a member of public, it seems like winning an argument against a member of the public and to intimidate and dominate them is much more self rewarding for their day than to save a man, who in their words not verbatim, is 'suicidal on that bridge'.
The law is that you have to PRODUCE your license, NOT give it to them. I've held my license up to the window before and there's nothing they can do as you've produced your license for them to see.
@@leeumney7675 don’t try argue your “sticking to the letter of the law” when it is just you unnecessarily making what could be a very short encounter even longer by being difficult. What difference does it make for you not to hand your license to the officer, other then wasting your own time?
@@user-co9ye6yl4v Yes, sticking to what I'm legally required to do, unlike the police what think they can tell you to get out of the car, etc. Or better still, start demanding answers to questions like where are you going, where have you come from, etc. If only they stuck to the letter of the law, that would make them sooo much better.
After this i wouldn't be surprised if you are repeatedly stopped for some reason or another, a 'marker' will appear along side your registration on the ANPR
Only minor criticism I have is you handing the license over instead of showing it against the window but fully understandable under the circumstances. Everything else spot on. Nice work with the public order the moment you said where's the complainant he gave up.
There is no law that says that a member of the public can't be rude or aggressive towards a police officer if an officer or officers have acted outside the boundaries of the law then there is ample reason why a person might become irate hostile aggressive and agitated and aggrieved they all stick together and make shit up as they go along that is why there are people who are aggressive hostile towards them if you have been overly targeted and blackmailed by these fraudulent people on numerous occasions I can understand why members of the public are aggressive towards them none of them know what it is like to be in a position at the time of being harassed abused targeted and every member of the public has been targeted by these individuals at certain intervals including myself where intimidation threats of kidnap abduction imprisoning someone is there to see they aren't any of your friends they are in tandem and in favour of the prosecution they want people to coerce themselves or incriminate themselves into wrongdoing so no one should feel sorry for these sad low verminous scum
Don't forget RTA163 is constable in uniform can stop a vehicke, you do not have to give details under that stop. It's RTA164 or RTA165 that you must produce licence insurance etc., like many other things they frequently get this wrong.
Funny how in an apparent emergency that required them to do something as dangerous as driving the wrong way down the road, potentially risking the lives of pedestrians and motorists alike but was somehow not enough of an emergency to require emergency lights, they still found time to immediately abort that mission to pull you over and harass and reprimand you instead. Unmatched police logic.
Bravo, handled perfectly and it would have been both safe and easy for them to turn their lights on. As you say they could easily have caused an accident.
For the cop to suggest he is above the law is pathetic. If they were actually looking for a missing person they should not have abandoned that search because they were shouted at.
Driver: "Why did you pull me over?" Officer: "Because you were hurling abuse at me" Driver: "That's because you were driving the wrong way up a one way street" Officer: "We are looking for a bad guy" Driver: So why are you pulling me over instead of looking for the bad guy you just mentioned?" "Officer: I guess you hurling abuse at us is now our number 1 priority" Am I missing something here? They were looking for a bad guy and just decided to call off the search to pull over a driver who gave them the finger?
Retaliation. Met police abusing the public AGAIN. Let's hope the 'special measures' weed out these rogue cops who have been put on the list for further scrutinising and possible dismissal. Big task for those in charge of finding the rotten apples. I'm not going to hold my breath.
Brilliant work🔥🔥🔥 I loved your video on how you deal with them Bully’s well done to you🤝👌❤️ is it ok for me use part of your video as a educational video please?? Like we all need to get this information out that we the people also have human rights🤝 ❤️
And also if you do give me permission to use part of your video, I will also tag your page in my description so it will be free advertisement for you my friend🤝
'step out the vehicle' intimidation fail
Obviously, there is NO crime in London to be solved!!
Oh, but there was a crime. A policeman got offended.
Nobody was reading my tweets then 😂😂😂
Snowflakes 😢
None they want to solve. Theres plenty to solve though they're just in untouchable communities
It's the City of London police not Khans Metropolitan lot
The reason they pulled you over was because you hurt their egos.
New subscriber 👍
Retalliation, no more, no less. One law for thee, another law for me.
NARCISSISTS. I.e.,: little bitches.
Lol. You little sycophant.
I am pretty sure that there is no legal requirement to like the Police.
Not even other Police like London City Police!
Too many dirty 🐽People In Gang Suits🐽, makes for a filth stye. Met and London are the filthiest. 👍
there is no legal requirement to like anyone
@@oddjobtriumph1635 , that is true.
Still earning the hate every single day.
At the exact moment he felt he was losing control he asked you to step out of the vehicle. That was a pathetic attempt I assert himself, he thought you would just jump out 😂 bless him
They want you out of the vehicle and into there's. The psychology behind it, is you feel like a prisoner. You will say and do anything they ask, to get back out of there vehicle.
@@jimmybhoy6438 Also you have started to contract with them by agreeing to exit the vehicle
@@simonsmith6158 I know the police can stop any vehicle on the road. But they still need probable cause to search it. They can't just search your car
@@simonsmith6158😂 it’s not contracting with them agreeing to get out of the vehicle, there are components to a contract that have to be in place.
@@Ai_Mindz Thats why i wrote that it is the start of one - to start to enter into an agreement that they are in charge is to start to contract with their "authority"
Remember....police officers are NEVER wrong....even when they are.
...for amoment i thought you were talking about jews ? lol
About time!! An auditor who won’t put up with shite. A few of the new guys are far too friendly with them so why bother.....please please please go after the gang badge thugs...it's disgusting and divisive......Wayne Couzens wore his badge with pride..
Go for it.... Good Luck and Respect.
Couldn’t agree more. They are FAR too friendly and don’t seem switched on enough to pick up on the covert manipulation tactics UK police use which is always passive aggressive, victim blaming, copsplaining and if all that fails, intimidation. I often find myself cringing when they don’t pick up on it or so quickly forget and forgive how badly they were just being treated once the officers start trying to minimise their actions by being all matey matey with them. It’s embarrassing and I feel does more damage than good.
One of the first rules when trying to help someone ( the old man ) is not to endanger yourselves or others. Driving down the wrong way on a one way street is dangerous.
True, if only they had disco lights and bells and whistles, to alert us, like emergency vehicles do. 🤔
Also illegal, in Romania your driving license is suspended if u do so.
And suddenly the concern for the old man just disappeared !!!
Whatever we pay the police it is FAR too much.
Ironically, we pay them to fine us.🤬
@@nokianige they wouldn't come.
Any amount of money that is paid to the police is already too much. The police is the enforcement arm of the State and the State has no right to exist.
We pay them to protect criminals.. especially London city cops, they protect the banking mafia "apparently"
The problem is they cut the pay in 1994, since then the quality of people joining has dropped dramatically
The old man they were looking to help made a miraculous recovery as soon as someone bruised their little egos.
true
Exactly - not so much of an emergency if they can do a u-turn immediately and stop TLA
Good point
Yeah, as per usual, what they are going to is so important they feel justified in endangering the public, but then someone hurting their feelings takes priority? The only conclusion to be made is they think their feelings are more important than the suicidal person 😢
Never ever hand your licence to them hold it against the glass.
Absolutely smashed them.
"Never argue with idiots, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". - Mark Twain.
In this case you managed to bruise the most delicate item in the world, a Policeman's ego.
The "You're racially profiling me because ofy Scottish accent" made me crack up 😂😂😂😂😂
It was a totally idiotic thing for him to say :)
They don't know the law and they certainly don't care about it and think they are above it as well. They hate answering questions but love to repeat themselves. Of course I have subbed and belled and I'll be sure to share your channel. Loved it how you shut that first copper down.
Handled those corrupt scumbags perfectly.
Let them know who pays their wages and who they work for.
Any acts of law need the publics consent
Exactly. Acts, stautes and legislations that have no connection to actual laws, which are a natural state, are nothing more than man made rules. As long as you dont violate rights, nor cause harm or loss, or threaten harm or loss to person or property without consent, you have broken no law, only breached a man made rule. And there is NO LAW which states that, as free human beings, we have to obey any rule created by another
We live by COMMON LAW rule only.
The police and government are sh1tting their pants, because people are waking up now
@@mijimonmaster 👍👏🎯🙋♀️🇬🇧
So they decided the search for the presumably vulnerable man can wait while they pull a motorist over .. Clowns
🤣 I nearly peed myself when you said …. ‘I don’t take advice, jog on see you later’ 😂😂😂
But what happened after that, do we know?
Way too many Police think they are above the Law , driving in a dangerous fashion without further care and attention is still a offence even for the Police
True but the Courts have ruled in their favour that are able to lie to the members of the public the shit they belt is disgusting to even listen to this is why people have to video record these bastards they make up rubbish as they go along they are literally pathological compulsive bullshitters there are reasons why no member of the public trusts them they make examples of them going after people or looking for people like they go on about is the most utter bollocks I have heard in a million years they come when a person is half dead or buried and the incident has long happened and the perpetrator has long gone and disappeared my friend's neighbour had his house burgled not about half a year ago and not one police officer came out to assist his neighbour they came a week after the incident had happened and his possessions were long gone and taken
Mate your awesome, you’ve stumped them on every bend , hope to see more
Now raise complaints against them for their driving and retaliatory stop.
If they fail to intimidate you their in a bit of a hole. Then it's "pass me that shovel mate."
The courts have actually ruled the opposite of what this officer claims.
No they haven’t.
@@stuartappleton2158 dickhead argument bot
@@stuartappleton2158 Can a police officer be the victim of a public order offence?
In DPP v Orum [1989] 1 WLR 88, [1988] 3 All ER 449, [1989] 88 Cr App R 261 the Divisional Court confirmed that police officers are not unable to be victims of section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 caused by swearing and other abusive/threatening behaviour
@@michaelcollins6973 they are expected to have a higher tolerance to it, but they can still be victims of public order offences.
DPP v Orum states behaviour( excessive), they the police are not used to being subjected to.
The word "excessive " is the key, all the precious little wall flowers have to say is,"boo hoo, I was mortally offended", the act( DPP /Orum) , built them a back door escape route......
Never hand ya license over mate. They are only entitled to view it mate. Keep ya windows closed and hold ya licence up to the window and don’t answer any questions they ask you at all. Good video.
Police haven't got a clue. Auditor firm but fair response
Screw the old man then to pull somebody over for hurting your feelings. Speaks volumes.
well done, police arrogance stopped in its tracks
Why don't you like us? Cop has just displayed why we don't like them.
We should educate people to not be scared of humans in uniform and never talk to them. That means by telling it very polite to them: I`m not discussing my day and I˙m I free to go.
Keep them accountable, from Slovenia.
The attitude these police officers have. Whether your City police or Metropolitan police you have to follow the law and rules.
You handled that brilliantly. They knew you caught them out on not following correct procedures.
Very well handled 👏
Unfortunately, thugs never like to admit that they are wrong.
Funny how their priorities changed from looking for someone when their feelings got hurt and all of a sudden that was more important.
yep , 3 helmets in a row ! something that a few of us are trying to kick back on ,is the fact the plod are armed with tazers and cs gas ,which is a breach of our peace ! Looking into that problem ! as there was no public dissoder !Cheers ! from Cornwall !!
Yes you can use that language to old bill. Keep pushing on Bro, your subscribers will Rocket 👌
Under 163 you were only required to stop, you were under no obligation to converse with these twats at all, great vid.
Is that absolutely correct? It's great to be educated by watching these vids. I've learned so much. 👍
@@paullancaster7066 They need to follow, and it usually is part of the 163 protocol to obtain them Stasi style, with Section 164 which demands details under law.
@@TheBrawlBox cheers 👍
Yeah i didnt think they were aloud to break the law in the process of conducting their business
They're definitely not "aloud" to but they can do it on the quiet.
*groans at pun* Unfortunately, they are allowed to. They can break road traffic rules without their blues and twos, in the duty of their job, IF it would be counter productive to use the lights and sirens. So if they were covertly following someone they could break rules to stay with them without their lights on because obviously turning them on would draw attention. My guess is that a suicidal person is the go to answer for them in this situation as they can say the lights/sirens would panic them and cause them to jump off the bridge. They were probably rushing to Mc D's.
If he was looking for some one , why did he do a u turn .
section 6 of the public order act read and learn there is not a blanket ban on swearing in public
Well bloody done mate
They can't be offended.
Yes they can, very easily in fact.
@@witchwaynow7572 I meant in a legal way, so they can arrest him
But you can be offensive😂😅😊
@@dearnapst Yes they can. That has been proven in court.
They can, but the threshold for being offended is higher than the public's.
Great stuff mate ,treating them with the contempt they deserve
You sent him away with his ego bruised& Battered 😂. well done you are Awesome
I'm not Scottish, but when ever I hear Scottish accent I'm proud to be Scottish 😁
im pretty sure the police cannot drive the wrong way down a one way street that's why they do not follow cars the wrong way round a roundabout
They could if it wasn't a danger. They aren't limited by the law saying not too, but they are limited by their obligation not to cause a danger to others or themselves. Wrong way down a 1 way street is hard to justify because people won't be expecting it.
All auditors take note, a prerequisite of conducting any successful audit is rapid fire response by maintaining questioning until answered, do not waver, hold them accountable until they "confess".
The terminology you’re looking for is during the course of the employment! Coppers are argumentative and forever reaching! 😂
Why does everyone always think we Scots are “aggressive”. We’re assertive and forthright, that doesn’t make us aggressive.
Love your work TLA, one of my many inspirations for starting my own auditing channel.
Just found your channel looking forward for more vids.
Let's click over to that well deserved thousand subscribers and here's to the next thousand. Brilliant stuff
Once again, they don't know the laws they're supposedly upholding and suffering from bruised, fragile egos that make them think that no laws apply to them. Personally, I would've been tempted to drive straight into them.
he obviously enjoys the word obviously, but its not obvious why he obviously uses it every other word, obviously ?
Obviously a fvcking illiterate worthless (unt
It's called nerves and a conscience from knowingly taking shit lol
"We pulled you over for what you said."
Seriously?! Feelings- Police.
Spot on my man.
ALL blue light training teaches every single blue light vehicle has to operate within the law of the roads.
Fire engines and ambulances travel at the speed for the road with lights on it allows progression through traffic.
Police are not exempt regardless of excuse.
The only idiots to do as they please
They misunderstood his Scottish accent.
No need to hand your licence over. Only to 'produce' it. Present it up against window.
We still live in a free country and have freedom of speech. You can use any type of colourful language you like and your right to use it is protected. It only becomes a public order offence when threatening words or behaviour are use which are likely to cause fear, harassment or alarm to a member of the public, not a police officer. Police are "supposed" to be highly trained professionals, who are expected to deal with the most unsavoury of our society. They are presumed to be able to cope with foul language, criticises of their behaviour and even verbal threats, without getting their panties in a bunch!!!!
Again, what happened to the guy they aere "looking for"??
fictitious they make up so much shit and garbage I don't believe for a second they were looking for anyone if they were they wouldn't have stopped the driver they would have gone after the guy they were looking for
“I don’t take advice, jog on, see you later” Timed to perfection 😂
lol one of my better ones
What a stupid policeman yet again thinking they can do what they like to the puplic ...
Even though the police are in the wrong here and was made aware of that by a member of public, it seems like winning an argument against a member of the public and to intimidate and dominate them is much more self rewarding for their day than to save a man, who in their words not verbatim, is 'suicidal on that bridge'.
Treat them with the same contempt they treat us !......they do this to justify what they do !.....but they're not very good at it !
Verbal abuse, really?
The law is that you have to PRODUCE your license, NOT give it to them.
I've held my license up to the window before and there's nothing they can do as you've produced your license for them to see.
Just unnecessarily difficult
@@user-co9ye6yl4v What is? Sticking to the letter of the law?
@@leeumney7675 don’t try argue your “sticking to the letter of the law” when it is just you unnecessarily making what could be a very short encounter even longer by being difficult. What difference does it make for you not to hand your license to the officer, other then wasting your own time?
@@user-co9ye6yl4v Yes, sticking to what I'm legally required to do, unlike the police what think they can tell you to get out of the car, etc.
Or better still, start demanding answers to questions like where are you going, where have you come from, etc.
If only they stuck to the letter of the law, that would make them sooo much better.
@@leeumney7675 they can ask whatever they want. Doesn’t make it illegal for them to ask questions about where you are going or stuff like that.
Brilliant!
You don't take prisoners do you. 😉
Who the hell is going to get distressed and alarmed at a few swear words?
After this i wouldn't be surprised if you are repeatedly stopped for some reason or another, a 'marker' will appear along side your registration on the ANPR
TLA is amazing at what he does! keep up the good work pal and keep them videos coming!
Only minor criticism I have is you handing the license over instead of showing it against the window but fully understandable under the circumstances. Everything else spot on. Nice work with the public order the moment you said where's the complainant he gave up.
Fairplay bro, handled like a pro 👌🏼
A retaliatory stop should earn them a lawsuit.
Never never never give them your licence, they are entitled to see it, but if they have it, they can hold you as long as they want
“I am not being aggressive “you’re having a giraffe😂 you just keep shouting need a bit of anger management😅
There is no law that says that a member of the public can't be rude or aggressive towards a police officer if an officer or officers have acted outside the boundaries of the law then there is ample reason why a person might become irate hostile aggressive and agitated and aggrieved they all stick together and make shit up as they go along that is why there are people who are aggressive hostile towards them if you have been overly targeted and blackmailed by these fraudulent people on numerous occasions I can understand why members of the public are aggressive towards them none of them know what it is like to be in a position at the time of being harassed abused targeted and every member of the public has been targeted by these individuals at certain intervals including myself where intimidation threats of kidnap abduction imprisoning someone is there to see they aren't any of your friends they are in tandem and in favour of the prosecution they want people to coerce themselves or incriminate themselves into wrongdoing so no one should feel sorry for these sad low verminous scum
You need abit of god almighty and lord Jesus Christ with name like that. 🙏🙌👍
@@sebastianeisenberg3826 🎯👍👏🙋♀️🇬🇧
Super Dirty.
Laddie you crack me up 😂
I love it , boy you’re better than itching power ……..
Absolutely superb work.
Complaint made?
I think you have dented all of their egos.... Well done!!!
Don't forget RTA163 is constable in uniform can stop a vehicke, you do not have to give details under that stop. It's RTA164 or RTA165 that you must produce licence insurance etc., like many other things they frequently get this wrong.
Police: you've got my details.
Citizen: is that what you tell the judge?
I absolutely agree when they are bored they look for law abiding citizens to give them crap , instead of looking for criminals and rapist, pathetic
San Joaquin Audit sent me. Subscribed # 3.77K...Support from USA🇺🇸🌟
Funny how in an apparent emergency that required them to do something as dangerous as driving the wrong way down the road, potentially risking the lives of pedestrians and motorists alike but was somehow not enough of an emergency to require emergency lights, they still found time to immediately abort that mission to pull you over and harass and reprimand you instead. Unmatched police logic.
Nothing more satisfying than seeing dirty corrupt cops been EXPOSED for EVERYONE to see 🤳 BRAVO 👏👏👏👏
Bravo, handled perfectly and it would have been both safe and easy for them to turn their lights on. As you say they could easily have caused an accident.
Nicely done made it clear intimidation wasn't going to work then they melted
Three officers standing there,in no hurry,where is the old man ,that they should be looking for,
For the cop to suggest he is above the law is pathetic. If they were actually looking for a missing person they should not have abandoned that search because they were shouted at.
Love how they both use different reasons/excuses! They won't ever admit they are law breakers
Just found your channel after Watching audited Britain good on u lad
No bodycam deployed by the police. Outrageous!
Why do we pay for these useless public servants should be sacked
You don't need to give them your license, let them read it through the window.
Driver: "Why did you pull me over?"
Officer: "Because you were hurling abuse at me"
Driver: "That's because you were driving the wrong way up a one way street"
Officer: "We are looking for a bad guy"
Driver: So why are you pulling me over instead of looking for the bad guy you just mentioned?"
"Officer: I guess you hurling abuse at us is now our number 1 priority"
Am I missing something here? They were looking for a bad guy and just decided to call off the search to pull over a driver who gave them the finger?
Retaliation. Met police abusing the public AGAIN.
Let's hope the 'special measures' weed out these rogue cops who have been put on the list for further scrutinising and possible dismissal.
Big task for those in charge of finding the rotten apples. I'm not going to hold my breath.
Nice one mate.
Amazing audit you got a new sub
Brilliant work🔥🔥🔥 I loved your video on how you deal with them Bully’s well done to you🤝👌❤️ is it ok for me use part of your video as a educational video please?? Like we all need to get this information out that we the people also have human rights🤝 ❤️
And also if you do give me permission to use part of your video, I will also tag your page in my description so it will be free advertisement for you my friend🤝
please email directly at thelaughingauditor@gmail.com thanks
@@thelaughingauditor I emailed you have a look please🙏
Well done sir 👏
Swearing at someone isn't a public order offense even if the "victim" feels alarmed, harassed or distressed.
The act needs to go anyway, using feelings to control which is abuse.