It was a year of profound loss in so many ways. At the Academy, we remember these accomplished filmmakers and artists. #Oscars #InMemoriam #AcademyAwards
@@trinaq keep in mind though, this is on live TV, right before they announce best picture, and they don’t want people to leave their couches and change the channel.
This beautiful segment was ruined by the fact that it was going too fast that we can barely finish the names of some of the people who passed away. Disrespectful.
Wow, calling a clip like this disrespectful. So you are suggesting this clip should be 10 minutes for the next award show? Or should they remove some "less important" names to have some others be visible longer?
How is this too fast? And how is it disrespectful. The dead are dead and gone, and the oscars are about honoring film people while they are relevant and alive. I think that it is very tasteful to have a quick (3 min) of silence and remembering of those who died. If you want more, watch one of their movies or visit their grave.
This is a disgrace to their memory. To have such a long path in the industry, to have made such a wonderful service to the world through your art, only to appear in an “in memoriam” video in the academy awards for a quarter of a second. This is a shame and it hurts me deeply.
@@diogenestheshadow-banned2322 yes some of them are actors, others are directors, cinematographers etc. It's very disrespectful to their memory and to what they did, building up Hollywood the way they did, speeding through them as if they were cast credits after a movie.
@@oscarandria But you are talking about another show. A show that is about those who died in hollywood this year. This is an awards show and I think it is beautiful that they take time to show this segment every year. I can't see how people wants to turn it into disgrace. If honoring people is disgrace, I think you have bigger issues why you react the way you do. Or why not create your own annual clip and upload to youtube where you honor these people?
@@Jon-xd7ng ok you’re actually totally right. I agree. But I still find it a bit disrespectful when you’re honouring their legacy and you don’t even have time to read their names. That’s my only complaint
@@oscarandria I can absolutely agree with you that it goes by fast there in the middle of the clip. My main frustration is with people who express themselves without any respect. And this is not toward you but like when people say it is a disgrace, they are apalled and so on. So you can't even make a celebration clip anymore to honor the deaths of big stars without spoiled people spreading hate? I kinda hope they cut this segment out next year and don't honor the ones who died, and then all haters has nothing to complain about. Oh wait then they will say that it is a disgrace that they cut the segment out. Lol.
Two time Academy Award winner Dame Olivia de Havilland pretty much ended the studio system, at least she weakened it A LOT, just to get a 1 second slide in the Oscars in memoriam :/
@@jostockton3291 English is not my first language either, but I know from the sentence structure that that was not what he/she meant by the comment. Otherwise, he/she would have phrased it that way. So I did a little research. True enough, Ms. de Havilland took Warner Bros. to court, challenging her talent contract. She won, and this landmark case not only weakened the studio system but influenced the labor environment in the entire state of California at the time.
@@boredstranger7522 The De Havilland Law is the common name of _De Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures_ , a published judicial opinion interpreting California Labor Code Section 2855, a California law which prevents a court from enforcing specific performance of an exclusive personal services contract (i.e., contracts creating a non-delegable duty on the part of an individual to another party, and no other, to render certain services) beyond the term of seven calendar years from the commencement of service. The section was first enacted as part of the new Labor Code in 1937. It was a recodification of an older statute, Civil Code Section 1980, which had been enacted as part of the original California Civil Code in 1872. The statute had originally provided for a two-year limit on specific enforcement, but the limit was amended in 1931 to seven years. Hollywood industry lawyers in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s took the position that an exclusive personal services contract should be treated as suspended during the periods when the artist was not actually working. Since no artist could be working every single day (that is, including holidays and weekends), this interpretation meant that two, or later seven, years of _actual_ service would be spread over a much longer _calendar_ period, thus extending the time during which the studio system had complete control of a young artist's career. In response, actress Olivia de Havilland, backed by the Screen Actors Guild, filed a lawsuit on August 23, 1943 against Warner Bros. Warner Bros. had typecast de Havilland as an ingénue, but she strongly preferred the other kinds of roles she had been given when she had been able to convince the studio to loan her out to other studios. The lawsuit resulted in a landmark decision of the California Court of Appeal for the Second District in de Havilland's favor on December 8, 1944. In a unanimous opinion signed by Justice Clement Lawrence Shinn, the three-justice panel adopted the common sense view that seven years from the commencement of service means seven calendar years. Since de Havilland had started performance under her Warner annual contract on May 5, 1936 (which had been renewed six times pursuant to its terms since then), and seven calendar years had elapsed from that date, the contract was no longer enforceable and she was free to seek projects with other studios. De Havilland's legal victory reduced the power of the studios and extended greater creative freedom to performers, starting with herself. The Court of Appeal's decision in De Havilland's favor was one of the most significant and far-reaching legal rulings in Hollywood. The decision came to be informally known, and is still known to this day, as the "De Havilland Law". Her legal victory, which cost her $13,000 (equivalent to $190,000 in 2019) in legal fees, won de Havilland the respect and admiration of her peers, among them her own sister, Joan Fontaine, who later commented, "Hollywood owes Olivia a great deal." While today's film and TV actors have enjoyed the higher compensation and greater creative freedom intended by Section 2855, music artists have not. Jared Leto and Shannon Leto of the band Thirty Seconds to Mars credit the De Havilland law with resolving their music contract issue in 2009, which sets a precedent for music artists and Section 2855. In 2015, British singer Rita Ora also cited the De Havilland Law in her complaint while seeking release from her American label. They eventually reached a settlement. Johnny Carson, then host of _The Tonight Show_ , used the De Havilland law to break his contract with NBC and began aggressively considering a bid from rival network ABC; his use of the law, although he ultimately decided to remain with NBC, allowed him to extract major concessions from the network, including a reduced workload, increase in pay and ownership of the show.
@@RaymondHng I'm not going to read what is obviously a copy paste info; it's too long anyway. As I've previously mentioned, I already did a research on the matter. But thanks anyway.
RIP Dame Olivia de Havilland. She was one of the few remaining of the old Hollywood world and the one who ended the studio’s invasive control of their stars. She deserves more than half a second!
She definitely deserved more including an actual clip. Makes my blood boil the way she was skimmed over in this and the SAG memorial tribute. Thank heaven's for TCM properly concluding theirs with Olivia.
How could you have given Olivia de Havilland, a two time Oscar winner, and a legend who lived until she was 104, 1.5 second on screentime??? She deserved so much more. This was very disrespectful, not to just her but also to everyone in this segment.
I'm sorry but this is the worst 'In Memoriam' segment by far, giving every icon who contributed their whole lives to the cinema a 1-second tribute come on now! And Olivia de-Havilland who won 2 Oscars and was nominated a further 3 times, lived to be 104, and was part of one of the most iconic films in cinema history getting a 1-second nod is so sad.
Some names that could have been remembered: Jessica Walter, Stuart Gordon, John Saxon, Michael Lonsdale, Honor Blackman, Tanya Roberts, Jose Mojica Marins, Naya Rivera.
I can remember when the Oscars took the time to show actual movie clips of the actors and actresses in the Memoriam segment - to see them performing in a famous scene, saying a famous line or funny line, and often times smiling one last time on the silver screen eased the pain of sorrow. I hope they bring that back some day.
Ennio Morricone but have Connery and Diana Rigg get a few bars of the James Bond Theme instead at the end. Put Boseman at the beginning to accommodate.
It's something how some of these actor and actresses have been in the entertainment industry for 60 to 80 years, and they gave them 3 seconds to honor their legacy.
"50 years in show business and they gave her 2 seconds" It might be true that "Feud" by Ryan Murphy was very fictional but this line really sums up how badly Oscars treat people of the business who have passed away despite years of work in the industry
They needed to be SUPER WOKE this year with everything even with the In Memorium segment by having a black woman to start it off and a black man to end it.
Connery and Diana Rigg should have appeared one after the other to the James Bond theme dammit. Fucking idiots... James Bond and Tracy Bond should have been one after the other with the Theme music...
Helen McCroy died 2 weeks ago and is most remember by her character Narsisa Malfoy in the Harry Potter series (Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince and the Deathly Hawllos part 1 & 2)
@@ramonsanchez2694 she appear in this video, her name and her photo appear before Ennio Morricone and after Kim Ki-Duk. Watch again the video and you see Helen McCroy's name and pic.
I didn't knew about Mr. Morricone! Long live to all these amazing and talented people! We thank them for the grace of their craft and it's influence in our appreciation of the art of film.
In the middle of this fast paced clip, the pictures go just as fast as the beat of the song, I believe a computer put this in memoriam together. When you wanna celebrate your peers you should call the best possible peers for the job. Computers are not peers and they are not artists.
Idk tbh, I was happy to see his name. But I don't think that they had any special segment to commemorate Il Maestro's memory or his music. I really wanted the Academy to do something cuz after all it's Ennio Morricone we're talking about, one of the greatest film composers of all time and my favourite!❤️
@@betocole Yes of course, very few young people today are actually aware of Morricone's contributions to film, however the death of Boseman seemed to have impacted everyone much more.
Ya'll really tried to make Chadwick at the end seem more important than everyone else with that extra time. Wow. Disrespectful. And for the people saying "Oh! There were so many people that died so it makes sense!" Yeah you know what makes sense? A 10 minute icebreaker that has nothing to do with the Oscars in the middle of the ceremony. I guess people are too lazy to watch a 3 minute memoriam. Maybe watch the Bafta one & get back to me on how this was a good approach to honoring the passing of some wonderful artists.
Hopefully someone can upload an edited version of this where it’s at an appropriate pace where the viewers can read the names and look at the faces and give their condolences.
Olivia De Havilland and Sean Connery should have been left for the beginning and the end as they made more of an impact on the history of cinema than anyone else on that list. Disrespect !!!
@@frankiehoskyn3948 totally agree. Especially for Olivia, two oscars, one of them for the unforgettable film The Heiress, and many nominations including for Gone With The Wind. They should've ended it with Christopher Plummer, then Sean Connery, then the most important Olivia De Havilland.
Boseman's impact on cinema has been exaggerated somewhat. To be fair he's really only known for playing one role, prior to that hardly anyone had ever heard of him.
No Boseman should have never been the last one shown. His "impact" on movies has been greatly exaggerated, he made a handful of good movies and played a super hero.
@@plutoshearer3650 , Not only for her Oscar wins and long and distinguished career but she also broke the studio system with her court case victory. This victory gave more power and control to the careers of screen actors.
Naya Rivera??? Disrespectful R.I.P Naya Marie Rivera (1987-2020)💔🇧🇷 she was part of the industry as a whole! She was actress, Singer, dancer, director (1time)and voice actress!
@@sketchpansy concordo plenamente! O pior é ver gente falando que ela era de tal coisa e tal... A indústria fala tanto de representação e é a primeira a separar. Palhaçada! Ela era atriz de cinema, tem um último trabalho recém lançado como dubladora, era cantora e etc... Não foi lembrada no Grammy, Oscar...
Why the rush? 😠 More than three hours of an event is not enough to properly pay tribute to these artists? This is as fast as disrespectful. Plain disgusting.
it was sad so many talented artists are gone, but some of them had a long life, even sadder when some of them still had so much life ahead, in the middle of their successful career and need to leave us, just too soon. one, in particular, Chadwick Boseman ,,, his were making the movie while he was with cancer.. it did not stop him from continuing...
I swear every time the chorus of that lousy song came up the tempo sped up so fast. the faces flew by so fast you couldn't tell who was there. Too many great and talented people were given the bum's rush.
Lousy song? This is Stevie Wonder’s masterpiece. I thought it was a great song choice, because they chose to celebrate their lives rather than be somber about their deaths. The lyrics say “I’ll be loving you always” throughout the song because we will love these actors always. Yea they really screwed up with some of the slides being way too fast, but the choice of song was great
Lousy song??? This song is a classic written and sung by a living legend! Yes, the Academy clearly screwed up this year’s In Memorium but that had nothing to do with the song. I truly hope you’ll take the time to listen to As by Stevie Wonder in its entirety, I promise you will not regret it!
I was here for cicely tyson Christopher plummer Olivia de havillan kelly preston fred willard diana rigg sean connery helen mccrory dmx and chadwick r.i.p. 😭 and too all of the others yall Legacy live on through yall works
Went by way too fast at the end. But there were very few omissions this year. Only ones that come to mind are David Prowse, Jeremy Bulloch, and Hugh Keays-Byrne
The person who was in charge of putting this segment failed the families that lost someone in the business! Music was a wrong choice, and the speed of segment could only be followed by someone on speed!
They fittingly chose photos of Ian Holm and Yaphet Kotto in their character roles as Ash and Parker from the classic "Alien", probably their best known parts in long careers.
I have to make a suggestion. With all the comments about this segment going by too quickly, which I agree with, why not double the length of the “In Memorium” segment. I think this segment is one of the most beloved segments of an awards show (for those who watch awards shows). You wouldn’t have to rush the honorees and could get more of them. I’d take adding 4 minutes of In Memorium over watching Glenn Close dance The Butt any day.
I second that. This one almost felt like they knew they needed to do it but squeezed as many in as possible on the usual time limit. They deserve so much more and there was some heavy hitters that year who died and got a 1 second clip. and so many others left out also.
Disappointing speed scrolling in places. One should dwell for the whole duration of this memorandum and remember the individual we have lost and not speed it up in places just to fit the rhythm of the music. So a little disrespectful I felt.
Total lack of respect to all who were featured in this. You would think that the Oscars would think a little more of their fallen stars than to give some of them less than one second of screen time. The names flashed by so fast that they could barely be read. Pitiful, they deserved better.
I always wait for this segment of the Oscars. To know who passed the year prior or see who the Academy had missed to include. Well, I hope Betty White will make the list on this year's Academy's In Memoriam segment. Or provide a separate tribute to Betty like what they did with Bob Hope and Katharine Hepburn in 2004 ceremony. Betty was the oldest member that had been added to the AMPAS in 2017 at age 95...
Here is my brilliant idea. The person in charge of the archive direct the IT guy who puts this together. That way there is someone in the room who realizes who these people are and what they added to this industry. Also, inform the Oscar broadcasters that just showing the slide show with background music is all people want to see. We don’t need the latest “hip-artist-of-the-moment” to out shine the memorial with their hit song of the week.
Did anyone know what video glas prism light overlay // Prism Light Leaks// Light Leak Overlays this is ? ❤ I love this very much - Cool also the mirror effects here ! :-)
This is not just on The Academy. Stacey Sher, Jesse Collins & Steven Soderbergh are equally responsible for this disgrace. It's like The Academy listened to every complaint ever made about the In Memoriam segment & then deliberately set out to make the worst one ever out of spite.
Don't play it with 20 minutes left in the show. Don't have a live musician. Don't have a presenter. Don't pick an upbeat dancing song. Take enough time to show each person for a few seconds. I mean, that's the model that every good Oscars in memoriam segment has taken. The speed of this one was nuts.
This in memoriam felt like a teacher going through the PowerPoint too fast before you could take notes
True
Precisely, it might have been more impactful if we were actually allowed to see the tributes for longer than five seconds each!
@@trinaq keep in mind though, this is on live TV, right before they announce best picture, and they don’t want people to leave their couches and change the channel.
@@Callium248 yep... very disrespectful. But that's a fact. People just don't care
@@trinaq MORE LIKE 1 SECOND ....TOTAL DISGRACE
This beautiful segment was ruined by the fact that it was going too fast that we can barely finish the names of some of the people who passed away. Disrespectful.
Way too fast.
Precisely, by the time you actually get to read the names, it flips onto the next person!
Wow, calling a clip like this disrespectful. So you are suggesting this clip should be 10 minutes for the next award show? Or should they remove some "less important" names to have some others be visible longer?
@@Jon-xd7ng this went by so quickly. They just needed a different song. I've never seen them rushed like this, and I've seen many of these ..
how is it disrespectful? smh
It was too fast. Disrespectful.
How is this too fast? And how is it disrespectful. The dead are dead and gone, and the oscars are about honoring film people while they are relevant and alive. I think that it is very tasteful to have a quick (3 min) of silence and remembering of those who died. If you want more, watch one of their movies or visit their grave.
@@svante1994 This is grade A trolling my friend. You are certainly a pro
I played it with 0,5 speed and it works. Gonna do that and add Ennio Morricone’s score on top of that. Voilà!
The dislikes are the disrespectful.
Oh stop complaining!
This is a disgrace to their memory. To have such a long path in the industry, to have made such a wonderful service to the world through your art, only to appear in an “in memoriam” video in the academy awards for a quarter of a second. This is a shame and it hurts me deeply.
They're actors, this is an award show. If this hurts you deeply, you need help.
@@diogenestheshadow-banned2322 yes some of them are actors, others are directors, cinematographers etc. It's very disrespectful to their memory and to what they did, building up Hollywood the way they did, speeding through them as if they were cast credits after a movie.
@@oscarandria But you are talking about another show. A show that is about those who died in hollywood this year. This is an awards show and I think it is beautiful that they take time to show this segment every year. I can't see how people wants to turn it into disgrace. If honoring people is disgrace, I think you have bigger issues why you react the way you do. Or why not create your own annual clip and upload to youtube where you honor these people?
@@Jon-xd7ng ok you’re actually totally right. I agree. But I still find it a bit disrespectful when you’re honouring their legacy and you don’t even have time to read their names. That’s my only complaint
@@oscarandria I can absolutely agree with you that it goes by fast there in the middle of the clip. My main frustration is with people who express themselves without any respect. And this is not toward you but like when people say it is a disgrace, they are apalled and so on. So you can't even make a celebration clip anymore to honor the deaths of big stars without spoiled people spreading hate? I kinda hope they cut this segment out next year and don't honor the ones who died, and then all haters has nothing to complain about. Oh wait then they will say that it is a disgrace that they cut the segment out. Lol.
Two time Academy Award winner Dame Olivia de Havilland pretty much ended the studio system, at least she weakened it A LOT, just to get a 1 second slide in the Oscars in memoriam :/
What do you mean with the studio system?
@@jostockton3291 And what did Ms. Olivia de Haviland do to "end" or "weaken" this studio system?
@@jostockton3291 English is not my first language either, but I know from the sentence structure that that was not what he/she meant by the comment. Otherwise, he/she would have phrased it that way. So I did a little research. True enough, Ms. de Havilland took Warner Bros. to court, challenging her talent contract. She won, and this landmark case not only weakened the studio system but influenced the labor environment in the entire state of California at the time.
@@boredstranger7522 The De Havilland Law is the common name of _De Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures_ , a published judicial opinion interpreting California Labor Code Section 2855, a California law which prevents a court from enforcing specific performance of an exclusive personal services contract (i.e., contracts creating a non-delegable duty on the part of an individual to another party, and no other, to render certain services) beyond the term of seven calendar years from the commencement of service. The section was first enacted as part of the new Labor Code in 1937. It was a recodification of an older statute, Civil Code Section 1980, which had been enacted as part of the original California Civil Code in 1872. The statute had originally provided for a two-year limit on specific enforcement, but the limit was amended in 1931 to seven years.
Hollywood industry lawyers in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s took the position that an exclusive personal services contract should be treated as suspended during the periods when the artist was not actually working. Since no artist could be working every single day (that is, including holidays and weekends), this interpretation meant that two, or later seven, years of _actual_ service would be spread over a much longer _calendar_ period, thus extending the time during which the studio system had complete control of a young artist's career.
In response, actress Olivia de Havilland, backed by the Screen Actors Guild, filed a lawsuit on August 23, 1943 against Warner Bros. Warner Bros. had typecast de Havilland as an ingénue, but she strongly preferred the other kinds of roles she had been given when she had been able to convince the studio to loan her out to other studios. The lawsuit resulted in a landmark decision of the California Court of Appeal for the Second District in de Havilland's favor on December 8, 1944. In a unanimous opinion signed by Justice Clement Lawrence Shinn, the three-justice panel adopted the common sense view that seven years from the commencement of service means seven calendar years. Since de Havilland had started performance under her Warner annual contract on May 5, 1936 (which had been renewed six times pursuant to its terms since then), and seven calendar years had elapsed from that date, the contract was no longer enforceable and she was free to seek projects with other studios.
De Havilland's legal victory reduced the power of the studios and extended greater creative freedom to performers, starting with herself. The Court of Appeal's decision in De Havilland's favor was one of the most significant and far-reaching legal rulings in Hollywood. The decision came to be informally known, and is still known to this day, as the "De Havilland Law". Her legal victory, which cost her $13,000 (equivalent to $190,000 in 2019) in legal fees, won de Havilland the respect and admiration of her peers, among them her own sister, Joan Fontaine, who later commented, "Hollywood owes Olivia a great deal."
While today's film and TV actors have enjoyed the higher compensation and greater creative freedom intended by Section 2855, music artists have not. Jared Leto and Shannon Leto of the band Thirty Seconds to Mars credit the De Havilland law with resolving their music contract issue in 2009, which sets a precedent for music artists and Section 2855. In 2015, British singer Rita Ora also cited the De Havilland Law in her complaint while seeking release from her American label. They eventually reached a settlement.
Johnny Carson, then host of _The Tonight Show_ , used the De Havilland law to break his contract with NBC and began aggressively considering a bid from rival network ABC; his use of the law, although he ultimately decided to remain with NBC, allowed him to extract major concessions from the network, including a reduced workload, increase in pay and ownership of the show.
@@RaymondHng I'm not going to read what is obviously a copy paste info; it's too long anyway. As I've previously mentioned, I already did a research on the matter. But thanks anyway.
RIP Dame Olivia de Havilland. She was one of the few remaining of the old Hollywood world and the one who ended the studio’s invasive control of their stars. She deserves more than half a second!
She definitely deserved more including an actual clip. Makes my blood boil the way she was skimmed over in this and the SAG memorial tribute. Thank heaven's for TCM properly concluding theirs with Olivia.
With half a second, she's still one of the privileged. Incredible and unworthy, this fast-track
@@marckunz5197 false
1 year of Irrfan khan sir passed
One of the greatest actor ever produced
We miss you sir
Rip 💔
@MousikeDB i know 💔💔
His passing was a shock...
How could you have given Olivia de Havilland, a two time Oscar winner, and a legend who lived until she was 104, 1.5 second on screentime??? She deserved so much more. This was very disrespectful, not to just her but also to everyone in this segment.
And they gave Boseman more than 4 seconds.
I'm sorry but this is the worst 'In Memoriam' segment by far, giving every icon who contributed their whole lives to the cinema a 1-second tribute come on now! And Olivia de-Havilland who won 2 Oscars and was nominated a further 3 times, lived to be 104, and was part of one of the most iconic films in cinema history getting a 1-second nod is so sad.
Some names that could have been remembered: Jessica Walter, Stuart Gordon, John Saxon, Michael Lonsdale, Honor Blackman, Tanya Roberts, Jose Mojica Marins, Naya Rivera.
Thanks by remember for also José Mojica Marins The Coffin Joe, from Brazil.
Naya Rivera 💔🇧🇷
Yes so true
Also James Hampton.
Also Haya Harareet. She was in Ben-Hur (1959) and she was great in it.
If you play back at 0.5x, you can actually read the names
Thanks.
x25
I can remember when the Oscars took the time to show actual movie clips of the actors and actresses in the Memoriam segment - to see them performing in a famous scene, saying a famous line or funny line, and often times smiling one last time on the silver screen eased the pain of sorrow. I hope they bring that back some day.
Watch the BAFTA ones. They're atleast smart about it.
libs took too many vaxxs
The music should have been something from Ennio Morricone.
Like Here’s To You from Metal Gear Solid 4?
Cinema Paradiso
Hi, Will, ; your suggestion is excellent.
AGREED
Ennio Morricone but have Connery and Diana Rigg get a few bars of the James Bond Theme instead at the end. Put Boseman at the beginning to accommodate.
The Oscars trying to appeal to a younger audience with "IN MEMORIAM SPEEDRUN in 3:01"
@@jackdonohue7893 R/Woosh
@@notchuckproductions5029 r/im14andthisiswoosh
How young?
Actually in 2:48, cause almost 10sec. are blank at the end. Disrespectful. And I didn´t find the music appropriate as well.
If these ratings keep up, we can add the Oscars themselves to these memoriam segments.
OMG 😂😂😂
OMG
Hysterical!!!!
@@kellycraig1144 At this point though it's getting sad.
Hahahaha, a nearly 60% audience drop. Get woke, go broke! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
This is disrespectful that they didn't mention Jessica Walters and naya rivera
And Natalie Diselle
And then John Lewis
I didnt know that Naya Rivera made films. Actually the only thing i know she did was Glee
@@TheProtagonist2020 They don't include politicians, only celebrities.
@@TheProtagonist2020 He didn't the cut.
It's something how some of these actor and actresses have been in the entertainment industry for 60 to 80 years, and they gave them 3 seconds to honor their legacy.
Not everyone was lucky enough to even get a full one second..
The pacing was totally disrespectful. Death is death. You made it feel like some of them counted more than others.
Funny bc it seems like they normally show preference
RIP The Oscars' ratings.
Exactly Rip the future of the acadamy awards they say due to lack of audience interest this ceremony could be eventally axed completely
There’s one more show for the Oscars.
"50 years in show business and they gave her 2 seconds"
It might be true that "Feud" by Ryan Murphy was very fictional but this line really sums up how badly Oscars treat people of the business who have passed away despite years of work in the industry
You f it up twice.
First by changing the order ASSUMING the votes in the best actor category, and by not putting Sean Connery as the last photograph.
They needed to be SUPER WOKE this year with everything even with the In Memorium segment by having a black woman to start it off and a black man to end it.
Connery and Diana Rigg should have appeared one after the other to the James Bond theme dammit.
Fucking idiots... James Bond and Tracy Bond should have been one after the other with the Theme music...
At least I can pause this on UA-cam and read the names of those who have passed. Academy: what were you thinking? Much to fast and disrespectful.
Irfan khan forever❤️
It's like the Academy felt ashamed for those who died so they just rushed it!
Full of straight white men and women..... That's why.
Not diverse enough for them anymore!
Damn. Why don’t you play “Flight Of The Bumblebee” for next year?
Or the Benny Hill theme
@@deniserodas6848 😂
HAHAHA
The lyrical content is quite appropriate for this context
I'm relieved that they kept this part short so we can get a segment of Glenn Close twerking. Thanks, Soderbergh.
Watch at 0.5 for a respectful In Memorium. Editing to the music where names fly by felt so disrespectful.😔
Just realized that Christopher Plummer died...
Rest in peace.
Connery hit me the most
Yes I felt the same having grown up watching his films, Connery should have been last.
Yeah. He was a huge icon for me
It ruined Halloween finding out he died. It just hurt so much losing such a wonderful person.
Helen McCroy died 2 weeks ago and is most remember by her character Narsisa Malfoy in the Harry Potter series (Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince and the Deathly Hawllos part 1 & 2)
She will appear in memoriam’s next year
@@ramonsanchez2694 she appear in this video, her name and her photo appear before Ennio Morricone and after Kim Ki-Duk. Watch again the video and you see Helen McCroy's name and pic.
And yet they failed to mention Felix Silla, the original Cousin Itt, who died on the 16th
Here she is: 1:00
@@LoneWolfProdNY I don't think so, guys. Sorry.
I didn't knew about Mr. Morricone! Long live to all these amazing and talented people! We thank them for the grace of their craft and it's influence in our appreciation of the art of film.
In the middle of this fast paced clip, the pictures go just as fast as the beat of the song, I believe a computer put this in memoriam together. When you wanna celebrate your peers you should call the best possible peers for the job. Computers are not peers and they are not artists.
2:38 Sean Connery: One of the greatest actors ever. A legend. RIP
Y'all are setting yourselves up by posting this AND leaving comments on💀
You just paid their next bill by crying
For a second I thought I had it set to 2x speed 🤣
I haven't watched the oscars but please someone tell me that this wasn't the only tribute to the life and work of the master Ennio Morricone
Idk tbh, I was happy to see his name. But I don't think that they had any special segment to commemorate Il Maestro's memory or his music. I really wanted the Academy to do something cuz after all it's Ennio Morricone we're talking about, one of the greatest film composers of all time and my favourite!❤️
Yup, that’s all they did. 600 works, over 60 years of career, 1.5 seconds of the In Memoriam.
@@rnnboom Actually he got lucky since someone is there for a quarter of a minute
unfortunately, Chadwick Boseman seemed to have more influence..... >:(
@@betocole Yes of course, very few young people today are actually aware of Morricone's contributions to film, however the death of Boseman seemed to have impacted everyone much more.
Why my youtube is playing this on 2x speed? Oh wait...
Connery + Rigg + James Bond Theme.....
Much better way to memorialize those two right there.
Ya'll really tried to make Chadwick at the end seem more important than everyone else with that extra time. Wow. Disrespectful. And for the people saying "Oh! There were so many people that died so it makes sense!" Yeah you know what makes sense? A 10 minute icebreaker that has nothing to do with the Oscars in the middle of the ceremony. I guess people are too lazy to watch a 3 minute memoriam. Maybe watch the Bafta one & get back to me on how this was a good approach to honoring the passing of some wonderful artists.
how I hated Chadwick over expose
Some of these went by at Fancam/ Dungeon Dragon speeds
R.I.P. Any respect the Oscars may have had in the past.
Hopefully someone can upload an edited version of this where it’s at an appropriate pace where the viewers can read the names and look at the faces and give their condolences.
The legacy and inspiration they leave behind.
They are all missed. May the all rest in peace.
Bless you, someone with something different and nice to say
Hopefully TCM gives them a better memorial...
Whoever created this “memoriam” should be fired.
Way too fast and too short.. 😪 RIP to all of the hardworking creatives we have lost.
In memoriam means you are honoring the ones who died but this slideshow is just unacceptable. The pacing was very disrespectful.
Saving Chadwick for last. Respect!!
Speeding through the whole thing. Disrespect!!!
Olivia De Havilland and Sean Connery should have been left for the beginning and the end as they made more of an impact on the history of cinema than anyone else on that list. Disrespect !!!
@@frankiehoskyn3948 totally agree. Especially for Olivia, two oscars, one of them for the unforgettable film The Heiress, and many nominations including for Gone With The Wind. They should've ended it with Christopher Plummer, then Sean Connery, then the most important Olivia De Havilland.
Boseman's impact on cinema has been exaggerated somewhat. To be fair he's really only known for playing one role, prior to that hardly anyone had ever heard of him.
No Boseman should have never been the last one shown. His "impact" on movies has been greatly exaggerated, he made a handful of good movies and played a super hero.
@@plutoshearer3650 , Not only for her Oscar wins and long and distinguished career but she also broke the studio system with her court case victory. This victory gave more power and control to the careers of screen actors.
RIP Chadwick Boseman
Wakanda Forever!
Naya Rivera???
Disrespectful
R.I.P Naya Marie Rivera (1987-2020)💔🇧🇷 she was part of the industry as a whole! She was actress, Singer, dancer, director (1time)and voice actress!
NAYA RIVERA.💔♥
@Rammenstein95 Naya was in last year’s 72nd Primetime Emmys In Memoriam.
achei uma palhacada nao colocarem ela, independente se ela era de tv ou filme.
@@sketchpansy concordo plenamente! O pior é ver gente falando que ela era de tal coisa e tal... A indústria fala tanto de representação e é a primeira a separar. Palhaçada! Ela era atriz de cinema, tem um último trabalho recém lançado como dubladora, era cantora e etc... Não foi lembrada no Grammy, Oscar...
@@Chambinho4.0 uma pena mesmo.. mais tbm, a industria é muito podre, infelizmente. Ela esta num lugar otimo agora!
Why the rush? 😠
More than three hours of an event is not enough to properly pay tribute to these artists?
This is as fast as disrespectful.
Plain disgusting.
it was sad so many talented artists are gone, but some of them had a long life, even sadder when some of them still had so much life ahead, in the middle of their successful career and need to leave us, just too soon. one, in particular, Chadwick Boseman ,,, his were making the movie while he was with cancer.. it did not stop him from continuing...
It's been a year since cinematographer Allen Daviau died at the age of 77 due to complications of COVID-19.
Fantastic ~ too many to count, but I appreciate they tried to get folks in. So many young ones that year.
Rest in paradise. 🦋✨
Always return to this for Stevie Wonder's beloved "As" from "Songs in the Key of Life" (1976).
Some people don’t even get a second on screen! They just run through them like “Get it over with”
Too much talent -and such a tragic year- to cram into 3 minutes.
96 people in less than 180 seconds is disrespectful. Less than 2 seconds a person during a 3 hour awards show. That’s criminal.
Perfectly said.
Its OK. We got to see a ghetto music quiz segment that included Glenn Close twerking. Totally worth cutting short the In Memoriam for it. 🤣 🤣 🤣
In Memoriam is right! 1998 - 57 million viewers, 2014 - 43 million viewers, 2020 - 23.6 million viewers, aaaaand 2021 - 9.8 million viewers! 😅😂🤣
🤣😂🤣😂👍🏾
I swear every time the chorus of that lousy song came up the tempo sped up so fast. the faces flew by so fast you couldn't tell who was there. Too many great and talented people were given the bum's rush.
Lousy song? shows what you know
Lousy song? This is Stevie Wonder’s masterpiece. I thought it was a great song choice, because they chose to celebrate their lives rather than be somber about their deaths. The lyrics say “I’ll be loving you always” throughout the song because we will love these actors always. Yea they really screwed up with some of the slides being way too fast, but the choice of song was great
Lousy song??? This song is a classic written and sung by a living legend! Yes, the Academy clearly screwed up this year’s In Memorium but that had nothing to do with the song. I truly hope you’ll take the time to listen to As by Stevie Wonder in its entirety, I promise you will not regret it!
Not a lousy song.
I almost lost the incluiding of Cloris Leachman, but she was at the begining after Max Von Sydow two amazing legends 😭
WAKANDA FOREVER ✊
Wakanda Forever✊
@@alissoncordeiro4555 yes 😞
I still can't believe he is gone
In Memoriam editor: you know what? many people died last year. I'll just speed it up.
Academy: BRILLIANT
Irrfan and Chadwick made me tear up.
Especially Irrfan.. I remember how I cried with my friends when I got the news of his loss...
So disrespectful.
What a shame
Rip to all the great legendary movie stars who have worked and contributed a lot for the world cinema. May their soul rest in peace. 🙏🙏🙏
It's a shame that neither Naya Rivera nor Jessica Walters were included!
Jessica played in tons of moves the classic The Group and Play Misty for Me
Weren't they more known for TV?
@@Denis-89 that doesn’t matter, they should still be included.
💔🇧🇷
@@Denis-89 Yes!
Rest in peace, Max von Sydow and Ennio Morricone.
007 and Black Panther ❤️❤️
This version of As is awesome. Love and respect for all that were lost. 💐
So fast that I couldn't even read!!!!!
disrespectful to say the least
I was here for cicely tyson Christopher plummer Olivia de havillan kelly preston fred willard diana rigg sean connery helen mccrory dmx and chadwick r.i.p. 😭 and too all of the others yall Legacy live on through yall works
Christopher Plummer (1929 - 2021)
Chadwick Boseman (1976 - 2020)
Went by way too fast at the end. But there were very few omissions this year. Only ones that come to mind are David Prowse, Jeremy Bulloch, and Hugh Keays-Byrne
Naya Rivera
@@Chipster321 That's another one. I feel like they left her out because she was mainly known for TV
This was edited with way too fast pacing...sad
Is it possible that you could have gone a bit faster ???
They deserve more than...this thing
This is hearbreaking 💔
bring back the days when you at least saw a clip of each in a film most noted for.....and LESS time on dance numbers
Geeze!!!! was this rushed🙄🙄 great job hollywood 😡 that's how you respect Legends... Truly Awful and disrespectful. This needs more thumbs down.
Michael Lonsdale, Yuko Takeuchi, Ng Man-tat, Armen Dzhigarkhanyan, David Prowse, John le Carré, Jessica Walter.
Very quick and disrespectful to the honorees...
The person who was in charge of putting this segment failed the families that lost someone in the business! Music was a wrong choice, and the speed of segment could only be followed by someone on speed!
They fittingly chose photos of Ian Holm and Yaphet Kotto in their character roles as Ash and Parker from the classic "Alien", probably their best known parts in long careers.
This is disgraceful. Shame on them. Meanwhile they had a longer segment regarding guess that Oscar song....
I have to make a suggestion. With all the comments about this segment going by too quickly, which I agree with, why not double the length of the “In Memorium” segment. I think this segment is one of the most beloved segments of an awards show (for those who watch awards shows). You wouldn’t have to rush the honorees and could get more of them. I’d take adding 4 minutes of In Memorium over watching Glenn Close dance The Butt any day.
I second that. This one almost felt like they knew they needed to do it but squeezed as many in as possible on the usual time limit. They deserve so much more and there was some heavy hitters that year who died and got a 1 second clip. and so many others left out also.
Kelly Preston was my celebrity crush as a teenager. I cried my heart out when she died.
Disappointing speed scrolling in places. One should dwell for the whole duration of this memorandum and remember the individual we have lost and not speed it up in places just to fit the rhythm of the music. So a little disrespectful I felt.
Total lack of respect to all who were featured in this. You would think that the Oscars would think a little more of their fallen stars than to give some of them less than one second of screen time. The names flashed by so fast that they could barely be read. Pitiful, they deserved better.
I always wait for this segment of the Oscars. To know who passed the year prior or see who the Academy had missed to include. Well, I hope Betty White will make the list on this year's Academy's In Memoriam segment. Or provide a separate tribute to Betty like what they did with Bob Hope and Katharine Hepburn in 2004 ceremony. Betty was the oldest member that had been added to the AMPAS in 2017 at age 95...
She did. Jamie Lee Curtis did a special tribute for her. Tyler Perry did one for Sidney Poitier, and Bill Murray honored Ivan Reitman.
Both Terry Jones and Irrfan Khan were always remembered at the 2021 Oscars.
Great version by Stevie. Very nice.
Here is my brilliant idea. The person in charge of the archive direct the IT guy who puts this together. That way there is someone in the room who realizes who these people are and what they added to this industry. Also, inform the Oscar broadcasters that just showing the slide show with background music is all people want to see. We don’t need the latest “hip-artist-of-the-moment” to out shine the memorial with their hit song of the week.
Where is *Naya Rivera* & *Jessica Walter* ?
They were television actresses. Why would they be in the In Memoriam segment of an awards show about movies?
Did anyone know what video glas prism light overlay // Prism Light Leaks// Light Leak Overlays this is ? ❤ I love this very much - Cool also the mirror effects here ! :-)
wtf is this i just can’t believe this is too fast i-
It’s disgusting
In memorian of Haya Harareet (Actress Ben Hur 1959)
This is not just on The Academy. Stacey Sher, Jesse Collins & Steven Soderbergh are equally responsible for this disgrace. It's like The Academy listened to every complaint ever made about the In Memoriam segment & then deliberately set out to make the worst one ever out of spite.
Don't play it with 20 minutes left in the show. Don't have a live musician. Don't have a presenter. Don't pick an upbeat dancing song. Take enough time to show each person for a few seconds. I mean, that's the model that every good Oscars in memoriam segment has taken. The speed of this one was nuts.
若くして逝った人、人生を全うした人それぞれでも素晴らしい映画人たちに出会えて良かった。たくさんの夢をありがとう、そして安らかに
It didn’t move too fast at first but once it started to it was so painfully obvious