Labour got 33.7% of the vote 😮but if you count every adult in uk over 50 million labour got less then 10 million votes so only 1 in 5 adults bothered to vote labour 🙄
The lesson to be learned here is to understand about time, place and circumstance in connection to intention and outcome. For example if Natos purpose all along was to do more than keep Ukraine on standby as a runway to Ps trap door, the understanding was that Ukraine was already being assisted in self defense and training and should already be capable to sustain for a day like that day in Feb 2022. Further, the intention behind natos primary objective will be revealed given outcome where the moves given the begining to its verifiable end (outcome) will reveal these intentions. And so far it sounds like job abandonment by nato is already underway, especially if the members are thinking of going rogue and regrouping from side to side. (Hungary one way in Ps favor while France another.) And considering the nature of 'pacts' like the ones that existed that led to the events of WW1 we are witnessing a repeat given the failures here. SIM analysis: Given player 1 cause 1 primary objective we see another alignment and one that fits their declaration given a verifiable opponent. And it isn't the EU, its player 3. And it isn't about a land grab (though through the ages given the cause securing land given a cause was the verifiable result of the agreement among the players given the win-lose factors in testimony of the victor. And the UN will back that up for the sake of peace despite the right-wrong factors given Ps efforts already as long as Z signs on the dotted line as 'loser.' (And we know that the player that loses has to take the blame given the Victor's action. As evidenced given the majority of testimony coming from the spectators over the assumption of Zs impending loss and what he must do. 😉) But if that day come he will not be along when it comes to accomplices (those who were making the moves for him despite being ranked #1) ACCOMPLICES WHO WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EXCUSE THEIR WAY BACK OUT HIS TRAP DOOR. 😉
Worthwhile analysis - and shows up the dominant delusions circulating at the moment.
In WW2 it was 10,000 a day for the USSR, so this is small fry.
Labour got 33.7% of the vote 😮but if you count every adult in uk over 50 million labour got less then 10 million votes so only 1 in 5 adults bothered to vote labour 🙄
Yeah, and even fewer bothered to vote Conservative, so what's your fucking point?
GO RUSSIA!!
The lesson to be learned here is to understand about time, place and circumstance in connection to intention and outcome.
For example if Natos purpose all along was to do more than keep Ukraine on standby as a runway to Ps trap door, the understanding was that Ukraine was already being assisted in self defense and training and should already be capable to sustain for a day like that day in Feb 2022.
Further, the intention behind natos primary objective will be revealed given outcome where the moves given the begining to its verifiable end (outcome) will reveal these intentions.
And so far it sounds like job abandonment by nato is already underway, especially if the members are thinking of going rogue and regrouping from side to side. (Hungary one way in Ps favor while France another.) And considering the nature of 'pacts' like the ones that existed that led to the events of WW1 we are witnessing a repeat given the failures here.
SIM analysis:
Given player 1 cause 1 primary objective we see another alignment and one that fits their declaration given a verifiable opponent. And it isn't the EU, its player 3.
And it isn't about a land grab (though through the ages given the cause securing land given a cause was the verifiable result of the agreement among the players given the win-lose factors in testimony of the victor. And the UN will back that up for the sake of peace despite the right-wrong factors given Ps efforts already as long as Z signs on the dotted line as 'loser.' (And we know that the player that loses has to take the blame given the Victor's action. As evidenced given the majority of testimony coming from the spectators over the assumption of Zs impending loss and what he must do. 😉)
But if that day come he will not be along when it comes to accomplices (those who were making the moves for him despite being ranked #1)
ACCOMPLICES WHO WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EXCUSE THEIR WAY BACK OUT HIS TRAP DOOR. 😉