@@Mr_HassellBy your logic, why explain anything at all? By my logic, the Hamiltonian is central to the entire theory, and therefore needs to be defined.
@@kirdref9431 No, by my logic if you attend a graduate level math seminar there is a minimum you should already know. What a Hamiltonian is, is one of the things you should already know.
@@Mr_HassellNo man, at time 5:00 the lecturer FINALLY gets around to saying that the Hamiltonian is the total energy of the system, as a function of the position and velocity of particles of the system. He should have stated that up front, right away. If everyone already knew, he wouldn't to have to say it at all. I knew, many knew, but clearly not even all seminar attendees knew. Jeez.
@@kirdref9431 What a rude comment. You're watching a graduate seminar. If you want to learn what a hamiltonian is, watch an introductory classical mechanics course. There are many on youtube.
2 answers.....one beyond the mind of man ........the other is 4__4... Or whatever that measurement might be ....4()4 it's just a saying for a giant brick that used to make the pyramids and other things ...... Just a big giant brick. ??? go figure 😢😮😂😊
Since any differentiable * function at a point is continuous, implying that zero and infinity are both recognized, isn't there a contradiction? * ∂ partial derivative generalizing Gallileo's speed = distance/time to the instantaneous rate of change of a dependent variable with respect to one of an independent multi-variable function by declaring the others unchanging constants, who's derivatives are zero.
Too much insight in just one hour. Thank you for sharing this amazing seminar, and kudos to the instructor!
Nice approach for a mathematics audience.
i like the seminar, but who loaded up the video with ads every couple of minutes? Too much
q looks the same as g, and T should be t (T is temperature and t is time)
This is a specific type of quantization probably Hamiltonian..
could use more words on table
Since any differentiable function at a point is continuous, implying that zero and infinity are both recognized, isn't there a contradiction?
sorry but that does not make any sense
It's lame to start babbling about the Hamiltonian without defining what it is.
This is a graduate seminar in mathematics, should he also explain what an equal sign means?
@@Mr_HassellBy your logic, why explain anything at all? By my logic, the Hamiltonian is central to the entire theory, and therefore needs to be defined.
@@kirdref9431 No, by my logic if you attend a graduate level math seminar there is a minimum you should already know. What a Hamiltonian is, is one of the things you should already know.
@@Mr_HassellNo man, at time 5:00 the lecturer FINALLY gets around to saying that the Hamiltonian is the total energy of the system, as a function of the position and velocity of particles of the system. He should have stated that up front, right away. If everyone already knew, he wouldn't to have to say it at all. I knew, many knew, but clearly not even all seminar attendees knew. Jeez.
@@kirdref9431 What a rude comment. You're watching a graduate seminar. If you want to learn what a hamiltonian is, watch an introductory classical mechanics course. There are many on youtube.
😮....what do you suppose
...we make PYRAMIDS
..... WHILE YOUR LIFE GOES ON
.. . ....😊 YOU'LL KILL US
....OR WE GET BAD ATTENTION
😂
Take your meds and go back to bed grandma
@@andrewwhite9302 I think thats a bot
Very poor performance..... Rubbish.
you're rubbish
😊.... You are not very compliant
Apeman, please go away.
2 answers.....one beyond the mind of man
........the other is
4__4... Or whatever that measurement might be
....4()4 it's just a saying for a giant brick that used to make the pyramids and other things
......
Just a big giant brick.
??? go figure 😢😮😂😊
are you a bot? or just a nut?
Since any differentiable * function at a point is continuous, implying that zero and infinity are both recognized, isn't there a contradiction?
* ∂ partial derivative generalizing Gallileo's speed = distance/time to the instantaneous rate of change of a dependent variable with respect to one of an independent multi-variable function by declaring the others unchanging constants, who's derivatives are zero.