Gisele Bündchen talks spirituality and being ruled by the moon at Watches & Wonders 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 кві 2024
  • On the opening day of Watches & Wonders in Geneva, supermodel Gisele Bündchen visited IWC Schaffhausen at its booth. Speaking about her deep links and guidance from the moon, Gisele explained her theory about watches having an energy. During her visit, Gisele toured the booth, which this year is designed as “A Tribute to Eternity.” Reflecting the endless cycle of day and night, the booth showcased the new colours of Silver Moon, Horizon Blue, Dune, and Obsidian; each of which is uniquely reminiscent of parts of the endless cycle of day and night.
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @JasminaRistic-my3ez
    @JasminaRistic-my3ez 2 місяці тому

    Gisele you are so beautiful, natural and classy. IWC chose the right testimonial. Love it!

  • @edmonddantes1210
    @edmonddantes1210 2 місяці тому +1

    ❤💯👏

  • @Starstreak170
    @Starstreak170 2 місяці тому +2

    Paid to say whatever IWC want. Not a watch enthusiast.

    • @AlexanderWang689
      @AlexanderWang689 Місяць тому

      Not exactly, it is her who made them move, she runs the show

  • @HeyWattsUpCycling
    @HeyWattsUpCycling 2 місяці тому +3

    brave of iwc to put a disgusting, dishonest cheater as a brand ambassador right now...

    • @mattman237
      @mattman237 2 місяці тому +1

      Brave of you to troll so proudly with your ignorance.

    • @HeyWattsUpCycling
      @HeyWattsUpCycling 2 місяці тому

      @@mattman237 someones gotta stand up against the matriarchy

    • @commentarytalk1446
      @commentarytalk1446 2 місяці тому

      @@mattman237 "you" is not a valid counter-argument - it's resort to ad hom fallacy which is in most cases an admission of no counter-argument that is immediately obvious thus strengthening the original assertion.
      Due to the way celebrity and image rights operate, if someone conducts their personal life in a manner that could be interpreted as disreputable, that information is fair coverage in the public domain due to the way news-media operates to present information to entertain and inform the public that combines commercial revenue and draws public attention.
      The comment or argument put forwards: "Brave of iwc . . . [disreputable reputation of X]" can be said thus to be a valid argument whether or not someone personally likes or dislikes that fact.

    • @mattman237
      @mattman237 2 місяці тому

      @@commentarytalk1446 Fair retort, however, since the original post relies entirely on tabloid speculation and asserts opinion as fact, their argument is petty at best.

    • @mattman237
      @mattman237 2 місяці тому

      @@commentarytalk1446 If anything, I'm pointing out the OPs disreputation by spreading unsubstantiated rumors in a public forum.

  • @AlexanderWang689
    @AlexanderWang689 Місяць тому

    The very name of the brand is ambiguous, IPhone is phone but saying I is a bit different. Not everything that is created even in Swiss land is Swiss made. They have own fans too, however it seems more like forced love, not generated one as if someone said let’s build a car or let’s build a watch. It is like a sailor in sinking boat that discharges water every day to stay afloat. Anything cool about this and everything is you, nothing else matters. I believe you enjoyed a trip, hugs hugs.

    • @AlexanderWang689
      @AlexanderWang689 Місяць тому

      I use iPhone, but I am not a phone or am I?

    • @AlexanderWang689
      @AlexanderWang689 Місяць тому

      Another key point is when they share some share, it does not mean that you own, but rather the opposite, not always, sometimes in some cases it works that way.