Brian Greene, Frederick Lepore and Thomas Levenson: The Genius of Einstein

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 бер 2015
  • What made Albert Einstein one of the greatest scientific geniuses the world has ever known?
    His scientific breakthroughs revolutionized the way we understand the universe. The World Science Festival, in partnership with the 92Y’s 7 Days of Genius Festival, presents an in-depth look into the genius of Einstein. Join physicist Brian Greene, neurologist Frederick Lepore and author and filmmaker Thomas Levenson for a lively and informative conversation on the science, the brain and the life of one of history’s most fascinating men.
    Subscribe for more videos like this: bit.ly/1GpwawV
    Facebook: / 92ndstreety
    Twitter: / 92y
    Tumblr: / 92y
    Instagram: / 92ndstreety
    On Demand: www.92yondemand.org

КОМЕНТАРІ • 196

  • @excambo
    @excambo 2 роки тому +9

    I learned about physics from these UA-cams in age 65 years. It is the best way of spending senior years.

  • @makor2817
    @makor2817 5 років тому +80

    it must be exhausting to explain everything you understand everyday to everyone. Impressive patiente and attitude from Brian Greene.

    • @klausantitheistbolvig8372
      @klausantitheistbolvig8372 3 роки тому +2

      I think it would make it a lot more easy! And who on earth wouldn’t like this celebrity status he achieved .

    • @maan1511
      @maan1511 3 роки тому +1

      Teachers do this every day?

    • @katiekat4457
      @katiekat4457 3 роки тому +2

      It could be worse. You could be Einstein and everyone you ever talked to was stupider than you.

    • @simonramos485
      @simonramos485 2 роки тому

      @@klausantitheistbolvig8372 on this short video here i easily explain 'the shape of earth' with real mainstream science.., lol and it is not a globe...
      🧐
      ua-cam.com/video/XgiO8L2WZgc/v-deo.html

    • @simonramos485
      @simonramos485 2 роки тому

      @@maan1511 on this short video here i easily explain 'the shape of earth' with real mainstream science.., lol and it is not a globe...
      🧐
      ua-cam.com/video/XgiO8L2WZgc/v-deo.html

  • @Dr10Jeeps
    @Dr10Jeeps 5 років тому +37

    Brian Greene is a master at explaining very complex physics. I truly enjoy listening to him. He is both informative and engaging.

    • @twstf8905
      @twstf8905 4 роки тому +1

      Well then, why don't you MARRY him?!?

    • @simonramos485
      @simonramos485 2 роки тому

      @@twstf8905 on this short video here i easily explain 'the shape of earth' with real mainstream science.., lol and it is not a globe...
      🧐
      ua-cam.com/video/XgiO8L2WZgc/v-deo.html

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 2 роки тому

      Ask political Brian Greene 💰 about Frank DiMeglio. He's lying about physics. It's acceptable among them, as it is a game of maximum money making agenda "physics".

    • @DavidStJames11
      @DavidStJames11 2 роки тому

      @@twstf8905 we

  • @greginfla7211
    @greginfla7211 Рік тому

    Thanks for the link to the full video

  • @theresachung703
    @theresachung703 Місяць тому

    I so respect your wonder too!

  • @sydneymorey6059
    @sydneymorey6059 4 роки тому +2

    We live and learn, thanks, you tube.

  • @fvckinfool101
    @fvckinfool101 5 років тому +8

    It amazes me how many theories are based off one mans theory and equations! What a legacy. General Relativity.
    Inflation
    Black holes
    The Big Bang
    Time
    Matter energy equivalence
    I’d even go as far as to say it led to speculation of a multiverse.

  • @innosanto
    @innosanto Рік тому +1

    Niels Bohr and Max Planck, two of the founding fathers of Quantum Theory, each received a Nobel Prize in Physics for their work on quanta. Einstein is considered the third founder of Quantum Theory because he described light as quanta in his theory of the Photoelectric Effect, for which he won the 1921 Nobel Prize.

  • @user-td6zp9gj9m
    @user-td6zp9gj9m Місяць тому

    Thats discussion was a Fantasic and Benefical for every readers .i knew a lot of informations about this debate.

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому +2

    Our jobs is to be in a nature’s, I have a friend who’s building engineer, one day he asked me what you’re doing, my answer to him was , I’m a nature’s engineer, because, I’m walking and watching the buildings, so both of us doing the same job in a different ways!

  • @user-td6zp9gj9m
    @user-td6zp9gj9m Місяць тому

    Frederick Leopore Completely explained about Brain How brain is based on and when i saw i informed Crucial Situation and i took advantage of discussion .

  • @stephanienirenberg7426
    @stephanienirenberg7426 2 роки тому

    I adore you. I am passionate for your way of teaching and learning from you is the highlight of my day. Thank you.

  • @billdecat855
    @billdecat855 Рік тому

    It's taken more than a decade for me to figure this out,🤔 but I think I finally got it.🥳 Brian sounds like Richard Dreyfus doing a James T Kirk impression. 😂😂

  • @sherlockholmeslives.1605
    @sherlockholmeslives.1605 8 років тому +2

    I understand Plato's ( 429bc - 347bc ) Wax Tablet Hypothesis. I think there is perhaps far more depth and truth to it in terms of cognitive neuroscience than is easily obvious.

  • @ancientpoet6958
    @ancientpoet6958 4 роки тому

    Interest in sounds first and how everything else works 🧐

  • @innosanto
    @innosanto Рік тому

    It is also motivation and interest which is not anatomy, it is environment and way of thinking and way of enjoying and experiencing.

  • @ss-mx2ob
    @ss-mx2ob Рік тому

    Loved Brian gave a look to his wife and having a great moment:)

  • @srothbardt
    @srothbardt 2 роки тому

    Space and time begin to exist when creation begins. It may begin continuously. Time happens when duality happens (becoming aware of space).

  • @kevincasson9848
    @kevincasson9848 Рік тому

    Greatest scientust ever! Sir Isacc Newton. I mean invented Calculas in the 17th century! Now that is genious!!

  • @tomaims
    @tomaims 8 років тому

    To Peter Faust:
    yes he did but Einsteins theory and writings on photo, electric and light clarified and confused the subject. He stirred the stew so to speak and served the stew to others so they could move forward. But yes, you are correct. Max Planck was a key figure in the Quantum stew theory, good observation sir!

  • @venkatbabu186
    @venkatbabu186 5 років тому +2

    There are always bigger and bigger objects and denser and denser and just never ending. We cannot see entirety even if you travel at speed of light. Universe is just like a dust on Saturn rings.

  • @seemlyme
    @seemlyme 4 роки тому +1

    36:46 his eyes 👁 are missing ? Not cool

  • @erebus79
    @erebus79 8 років тому +39

    Not a good choice of moderator. Still, pretty interesting talk.

    • @kylesingh7439
      @kylesingh7439 5 років тому +1

      Archaik85 He did this cool interview on this channel recently it’s called Brian Greene: A life in physics it was great!

    • @gorrezgorrez6450
      @gorrezgorrez6450 3 роки тому

      one thing about einstein, he proved gravity affects light

    • @simonramos485
      @simonramos485 2 роки тому

      @@gorrezgorrez6450 on this short video here i easily explain 'the shape of earth' with real mainstream science.., lol and it is not a globe...
      🧐
      ua-cam.com/video/XgiO8L2WZgc/v-deo.html

    • @simonramos485
      @simonramos485 2 роки тому

      @@kylesingh7439 on this short video here i easily explain 'the shape of earth' with real mainstream science.., lol and it is not a globe...
      🧐
      ua-cam.com/video/XgiO8L2WZgc/v-deo.html

  • @karenstudley2311
    @karenstudley2311 3 роки тому

    No one knows it all however bright they shine

    • @andrewbenn2701
      @andrewbenn2701 3 роки тому +1

      I must have missed the part when anybody said they “know it all...” Did you catch that?

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому +2

    Science will teach us how to believe the things which let us to know about the truth , based on evidences.

  • @pogtuber5146
    @pogtuber5146 5 років тому +4

    Gotta go look and see if Hawking's brain was dissected!

  • @ModernSunlight
    @ModernSunlight 3 роки тому

    I think one of the most overlooked conversations was the fact that the Michelson Morley experiment's 'failure' to detect an Ether in the cosmos was perhaps a heavy influence on Einstein's ability to let go of the fact that light does not behave in the way that the rest of science could not let go of....that light might actually travel without the need for a medium and, in fact, remain constant. Instead, the experiment, which was as expensive and as significant as CERN work today searching for the "God" particle, was considered flawed or lacking in ability by most all of the scientific community. Letting go, of past attachments is always required to move forward.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 роки тому +1

      Michaelson-Morley was certainly nowhere near as expensive as what CERN does, today. It was also nowhere near as significant. That all physics is relative was already known since Galileo and there was little doubt about that. The ether hypothesis was, if anything, a step back in the sophistication of physical ideas. Did it have to be ruled out explicitly? Not really. One can derive special relativity from nothing else than geometry and the relativity principle. It's a very simple algebraic derivation that leaves no room for anything else than Galileo and Lorentz transformations as the fundamental symmetries of the vacuum. Galileo invariant physics, while simple, doesn't explain electromagnetism and matter, at all. It is restricted to the high school level toy model of Newtonian motion with no explanatory power for any other phenomena. That alone is enough to eliminate it as a fundamental solution to physics (and it's trivially included as a limiting case for v

    • @badoem5353
      @badoem5353 Рік тому

      @@schmetterling4477 chill you're overestimating us apes, science has only existed for like 400 years actively+- imagine what another 200000 year+- might discover.
      Perhaps we're sensory limited still

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому

    The information that we have about human brains, is same as the information that we have about our spaces and universes, and we have long ways to find out more.

  • @kylesingh7439
    @kylesingh7439 5 років тому +1

    He did this cool interview on this channel recently it’s called Brian Greene: A life in physics it was great!

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому

    There’s more to come

  • @innosanto
    @innosanto Рік тому

    Lets clone 100 Einsteins.

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому

    This phenomenon, called friction and can effected time’s, and related to the powers of gravity !

  • @tomaims
    @tomaims 8 років тому +1

    To Ivory Frost:
    I think you are wrong Einstein was not involved with the atomic bomb (at least not directly) he warned of the power it would unleash. However, like many creative people he, as Dr. Greene stated may have gone down the (at the time, future history my prevail) wrong mathematical road. Think of music, say the Beatles, they shot there wad of creative juice and moved on. Never to be as good individually or even as a group after the 3 great albums: the last was "Abbey Road"', "Rubber Soul" and "Revolver", (perhaps snippets of the White Album). I am using this example as it is easiest for me. I hope you can follow my allusion about creative juice, amount available, and time to use it in.

    • @sherlockholmeslives.1605
      @sherlockholmeslives.1605 8 років тому +2

      +Thomas Aims
      My favourite Beatles' albums are the British albums Please, Please Me and Beatles For Sale, and Let It Be.

    • @terrywbreedlove
      @terrywbreedlove 5 років тому

      Albert was a very pacifist anti war man Yes his work eventually led to the A bomb but science does that sometimes. Not desired maybe not wanted but you open doors that lead to places you never originally intended.

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому

    During his time, which was 2 nd worlds wars on going’s , so all the enemies, was seeing by he’s eyes, but , during our time’s the enemies are invisible,

  • @LeonardoCosta-hy7pt
    @LeonardoCosta-hy7pt Рік тому

    25:09

  • @innosanto
    @innosanto Рік тому

    Einstein didnt even know the nuclear force when he tried to unify so he did not know all forces.

  • @izaccy
    @izaccy 9 років тому +20

    Wtf ! All 3 guests are like "okay!!" In the end she had to inject GOD into the discussion
    at 1:14:00.. jeez not a good moderator she seem completely off beat

    • @luckan20
      @luckan20 8 років тому

      +Zacky you are right and John X you are wrong. We are discussing of a man credentials and knowledge and who cares what his beliefs or his personal food/sex habits. The forum discussing Einstein whether a genius ?
      God, is a word used by people who fails to think and use it as a clause to escape from any meaningful discussion.

    • @david-joeklotz9558
      @david-joeklotz9558 4 роки тому

      @@luckan20 You are exactly the other side of the same coin of those who accuse non-believers. There are enough eminent physicists and those in physics who have no conflict or contradiction where there is faith in God. In fact it is remarkable that anyone studying physics, especially at the higher levels at university don't see God's work and prefer to declare that existence is an "accident" of good fortune

    • @04m6gto
      @04m6gto 4 роки тому

      @Language and Programming Channel No matter how many times you type it out, you can't make Einstein a theist.

  • @navpreetnoorie275
    @navpreetnoorie275 8 років тому +1

    Love you Brian

  • @nassert212
    @nassert212 8 років тому

    Science needs men like Brian Greene to present it to the world. I made this song using parts of a TED Talk by Greene: soundcloud.com/knobserve/distinctive-fingerprint

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому

    The quantum mechanics, is the key to unknown worlds! and works likes parallel worlds, in the real worlds!

  • @jimmylbarker13
    @jimmylbarker13 5 років тому

    He also had more glia.

  • @cerevor
    @cerevor 8 років тому

    Infinite stupidity is not just a figure of speech, but exists, and can be objectively proven by intent and actions. It is not just in big events, but people actively seek it out on an everyday basis (e.g. proving themselves by ultimately disproving). Yes, trolling, but even whole "lives", with the internet as a prime facilitator.

  • @fidlaf1
    @fidlaf1 9 років тому +3

    I still believe that geniuses are made not born. Every child born has the greater potential that Leonardo DaVince had. I stick to this theory because I know of a few kids that from birth had been mold to be geniuses. Stay tune about the future of those kids. They are still to young to see what is going to happen to this kids in years to come. Right now everybody that observe this kids, think they are different super intelligent, highly capable. This kids before the age of 2 years old they knew how to read, write amazing skills on math. By the age of 3 years old. They know biology like a high school students. They know physics and chemistry. Have you seen a 3 year old that knows all the 118 elements of the periodic table with their atomic number. Well this kids know it all. This kids have been in an enrich environment full of love, with lots of fun activities. We use music lots of music to open, expand and make connections with every part of their brain. So far this theory is working for this kids. So yes we still believe that geniuses are made.

    • @scarletandsheba1
      @scarletandsheba1 8 років тому +1

      +FIDIA Lafaurie "By the age of 3 years old. They know biology like a high school students. They know physics and chemistry. Have you seen a 3 year old that knows all the 118 elements of the periodic table with their atomic number." Knowledge is not the same as intelligence. I know plenty of people that know a lot, but are as dumb as a stump.
      But I do agree, intelligence can indeed be nurtured. But some form of intelligence must be genetic, or else why are most of us smarter than chimps? This would also imply a spread in baseline intelligence amongst humans.

    • @greyalien826
      @greyalien826 8 років тому

      +FIDIA Lafaurie yeah... no. It's both nuture and nature. People most likely have a capability, that they can either maximize or not. and yes, as scarlet said, knowledge =/ intelligence. that's basically just memorization, almost anyone can do that.

    • @FlockOfHawks
      @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому

      And ? Three years later now . Stay tuned you said . So ?

    • @817svijh
      @817svijh 5 років тому +1

      The kids turned to cannibalism and ate him. Funny how life works out !

  • @matterasmachine
    @matterasmachine 2 роки тому

    photons are between sun and earth, not space.

  • @venkatbabu186
    @venkatbabu186 5 років тому

    Energy in its pure form is a flat stretch of surface sheets. They usually are separated by about the size of a photon. A little disturbance can create shock waves which travel in the form of light. Say when an electron jumps from an upper sheet to a lower sheet it just gives light. Once they are given sufficient energy to fall through the layers it is just like higher spin to a lower spin which gives particle emissions. Space always create these kinds of particles.

    • @venkatbabu186
      @venkatbabu186 5 років тому

      Ex vitalink.

    • @venkatbabu186
      @venkatbabu186 5 років тому

      You look different. I have all the photos of you when you were young guys. But now you look different. Ex vitalink.

  • @mehdibaghbadran3182
    @mehdibaghbadran3182 3 роки тому

    Brains is the brains, depending how to used your brain, doesn’t matter how big or small is your brain, but the quantity of your neurons is the same with the others.

    • @corydinsmore1117
      @corydinsmore1117 Рік тому

      You sound like the dumbest person alive. English not your first language is it?

  • @izaccy
    @izaccy 9 років тому +3

    "Lets be honest, A lot of his best known quotes have to do with god" - WTF !!

  • @jacqueslutia6996
    @jacqueslutia6996 8 років тому

    Yes, Dr. Brian! Space-Time at the fundamental level is made of Vibrating Springs called "NUMBERS". This is a revelation from a brand New discovery. It simply means that Numbers are real entities which make all the visible and invisible stuff in the universe. If you want to know more, please ask me.

  • @thatslifethatswhatpeoplesa7434
    @thatslifethatswhatpeoplesa7434 2 роки тому +1

    Can the lady get some coffee?

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Mali chlapec hviezdy ✨ videl blízko nízko maličké chcel som dotknúť prstom tuším mali hlas a povedal zmeň mňa chcela otočiť hviezdu

  • @krass11able
    @krass11able 8 років тому +3

    Quantum theory was discovered by Max Planck.

  • @rgsliwa8298
    @rgsliwa8298 4 роки тому

    Photons have no mass. Time is conscious thought. Light moves in one direction? Interesting.

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 2 роки тому

      The page Nexus of Physics has now given the following two writings the thumbs up on their page. ALSO consider this: E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE UNIVERSAL AND MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE SUN AND THE EARTH are described and represented by BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational (IN BALANCE). Objects fall at the same rate (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS the SPEED OF LIGHT is RELATIVELY CONSTANT AS WELL. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. In fact, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. So, THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are not "falling" in what is "curved SPACE" in RELATION to what is THE SUN. This is nonsense. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY DERIVED FROM F=ma. This truly explains PERPETUAL MOTION. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. By Frank DiMeglio EINSTEIN NEVER UNDERSTOOD PHILOSOPHY, MATHEMATICS, AND PHYSICS, AS HE HAS BEEN TOTALLY OUTSMARTED BY SIR FRANK MARTIN DIMEGLIO: The balance of being AND EXPERIENCE is ESSENTIAL. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE. Dream experience is/involves true/real QUANTUM GRAVITY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. MOST IMPORTANTLY, in dreams, BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE. IMPORTANTLY, dream experience is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. THE EYE is ALSO the body. Dreams improve upon memory AND UNDERSTANDING. Indeed, there is no outsmarting the GENIUS of dreams. OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/with what is THE EARTH. NOW, get a good LOOK at what is the translucent, SEMI-SPHERICAL, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE sky. Excellent. The DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. THE EARTH IS also BLUE (as water). F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that, why, and how ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, and describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, it is NECESSARILY a matter of precisely how these equations are understood in a BALANCED, EXTENSIVE, AND INTEGRATED fashion in RELATION to/with WHAT IS THOUGHT. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), as the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Get a good LOOK at what is THE EYE. POINTS are points. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. F=ma AND E=mc2 PROVE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. OPEN your EYES. NOW, LOOK at what is the FLAT, SETTING, AND ORANGE SUN (with the SPACE around it THEN going invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE). This ORANGE SUN manifests or forms at what is EYE LEVEL/BODY HEIGHT as well. This ORANGE SUN is manifest ON BALANCE as what is NECESSARILY the BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE of THE EARTH/LAVA. The viscosity of LAVA IS BETWEEN what is manifest as WATER AND THE EARTH/GROUND. ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY electromagnetic/gravitational IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. F=ma AND E=mc2 do provide absolute, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, and CLEAR proof that ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THEREFORE, the rotation of THE MOON MATCHES it's revolution. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent with/as what is F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It ALL makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) are NOT "falling" in what is "curved SPACE". In fact, this is nonsense. It is PROVEN. By Frank DiMeglio

  • @Sharperthanu1
    @Sharperthanu1 Рік тому

    After Einstein learned a lot about Quantum Mechanics he no longer thought of God as being someone ELSE .He began to think of God as being more like US creating the illusion of reality.Einstein reveals this viewpoint when he says" Reality is an illusion albeit a persistent one."

    • @innosanto
      @innosanto Рік тому

      He founded Quantum mechanics. He is one of 2,3 founders.

  • @hebegebes1785
    @hebegebes1785 4 роки тому

    one thing about einstein, he proved gravity affects light

    • @innosanto
      @innosanto Рік тому

      There are alot of things about Einstein, but what you wrote is very important point.

  • @tomaims
    @tomaims 8 років тому +1

    To Zacky:
    If you are going to allude to a curse word and use symbols instead of letters use the correct number. The word you alluded to has 4 letters, hence 2 symbols (as you used the first and last letters) not 3 symbols, Intelligence anyone? Also, she did not dismiss the comments by the speaker, she stayed with the subject, a subject alluded to many times by Einstein himself throughout his life. I thought the moderator did a good job especially with the breadth and width of the topic-from neurological to philosophical through hard science. Kudos to all of the panel!

  • @Gunz911
    @Gunz911 2 роки тому +2

    Wow if this doesn’t encapsulate the average intelligence of a main stream journalist nothing will

    • @innosanto
      @innosanto Рік тому

      This is also the talent of a journalist, to respeesent the ineducated people and press the knowledgeable people to say in simpler and repetitive way for benefit of bigger mass of audience.

    • @nextinstead
      @nextinstead 10 місяців тому

      She has a nice beaver

  • @philjamieson5572
    @philjamieson5572 4 роки тому +1

    I think there is so much to admire about Einstein - so many wonderful ideas and mind-bending concepts that he introduced to the world. So, why do we keep seeing that dreadful cringe-making tongue protruding picture all the time? It's just awful.

    • @corydinsmore1117
      @corydinsmore1117 Рік тому

      It's a fucking photograph there's only so many.

    • @innosanto
      @innosanto Рік тому

      Because it is amazing picture.

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    knihy Mojžiša je vidieť aj zmena času

  • @ronwood7029
    @ronwood7029 Рік тому

    The conversation started stating Einstein wanted to know Gods thoughts …
    This is what god says at Isaiah 55v8 …For my thoughts are not your thoughts
    And your ways are not my ways .
    For as the heavens are higher than the earth
    So my ways are higher than your ways and my
    Thoughts than your thoughts “
    Man will never know all about God

  • @platonmarsov6892
    @platonmarsov6892 3 роки тому

    Green still did not understand the main problem of the special theory of relativity, which is still open.

  • @sendercorp
    @sendercorp 4 роки тому

    Sendercorp we bring peace, to Multiverse .

  • @04m6gto
    @04m6gto 4 роки тому +5

    What a great 'documentary' on Einstein. How have I never seen this? That lady, though, and her goddamn god persistence. No, Einstein didn't believe in your mythical god. Drop it.

    • @04m6gto
      @04m6gto 4 роки тому

      @Language and Programming Channel Wrong. He subscribed to Spinoza's God. AKA: Nature. Not a supernatural deity that pulls strings. Einstein was an atheist, as much as he disliked the term.

    • @bibiayube677
      @bibiayube677 3 роки тому

      @@04m6gto this is a lie that the faith heads tell all the time anyone with that much education and intelligence can never belive in nonesence

  • @venkatbabu186
    @venkatbabu186 5 років тому

    Nerds are nudity appeals. People have always been reading others brain. People have brains because of thought of others and that frequency create the sparks in you.

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Veľmi rád som kreslil kreslil atóm ⚛ kvety stále bol som vo vedomí že kreslim len jednu 8 atóm
    na bielom výkrese nakreslil som modrú farbu jeden chlapec povedal že som zmienil celi vesmír nepamätám si stoho nič len jedno slovo kedy sa to stane

  • @FlockOfHawks
    @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому

    10:00 i finger left handed , so do i have a knob inside my brain now ?

    • @pippaknuckle
      @pippaknuckle 4 роки тому

      Paul Macartney also, and he had a decent career too.

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Dnes viem že vagón je veľmi ťažký aj keď je prázdny mali chlapec 🧒 vagón som videl ľahký a menší než dnes keď som veľký

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    tak ako keby niekto chcel aby som nakreslil na bieli výkres modrú farbu jeden chlapec povedal že som zmienil celi vesmír nepamätám si stoho nič len jedno slovo kedy sa to stane

  • @alishoghi9898
    @alishoghi9898 4 роки тому

    damn woody alen likes Einstein

  • @enlongchiou
    @enlongchiou 5 років тому

    God don't play dice is collect, from his GR equation, vacuum dark gravity field energy ch(4.9 time proton's mass per cube meter for cosmological constant) at atom scale E=chR=ch/(4*3.14*137*5.3*10^-11)=13.6 ev, at proton scale ch/(8.6*10^-16)=(1.13*10^28)*e^2/(4*3.14),e=1.6*10^-19, 1.13*10^28 is ratio of strong force to gravity(g=6.67*10^-11), also is square of ratio of proton to Planck scale ((8.85*10^-16)/(1.6*10^-35*4.18))^2*g, ch=1.98*10^-25=(2*3.14*1.6*10^-35)(2.17*10^-8*c^2)=(2*3.14)*gm^2(string theory), m=2.17*10^-8 Planck mass, c=299792468 , h=6.62*10^-34, gravity(ch) work until to Planck scale united QM with GR, Einstein get the last laugh.

  • @evilbondchick
    @evilbondchick 6 років тому +8

    09:33 omg, did that woman just make a comment to audience for laughing at a fine line? judging them for laughing? jesus. what is that "hey" of hers supposed to mean? plus her ignorant comment masquerading for funny "you're scientist, you're supposed to know". does she even have a basic understanding of how science works?
    i'm 10 mins into it, and she already irritates the hell out of me.

    • @FlockOfHawks
      @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому +2

      37 minutes and filled with bloodlust

    • @FlockOfHawks
      @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому +1

      53 mins , fueled up the chainsaw , waxed the mask , wondering what the hell is wrong with burqas . . .

    • @FlockOfHawks
      @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому

      69 mins , entering the building , checking the saw in the bathroom , accidentally decapitating a peeing 7 foot 2 guard , sorry .

    • @FlockOfHawks
      @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому

      84 mins , she yells "you're too late sucker" , kicks me in the groin and leaves with the three gentlemen . . .

  • @rineeshparai1780
    @rineeshparai1780 5 років тому +4

    Worst moderator ever.

    • @JH-ji6cj
      @JH-ji6cj 4 роки тому

      Yes! And I think either she chose the audience questions herself or maybe they were written by her friends and family. I hate always wondering if diversity strongarming is at play, but her contribution was a disturbance.

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Veľkú hviezdu videl malú nízko maličkú cez sklo okná mali chlapec 🧒 neuvedomil som si to videl cez dvojité sklo cez moje dva oči cez sklo podobné som sa prevrátil v tak ako Einstein v škole mali chlapec 🧒 kde som sa chcel dotknúť prstom ✨

  • @innosanto
    @innosanto Рік тому

    If Einstein was later maybe he would know the nuclear force to make the unified theory.
    Generally speaking, Einstein was great.
    Now humanity is to train the next Einsteins.
    And we could clone some Einsteins wehave the DNA.

  • @dmitryshusterman9494
    @dmitryshusterman9494 8 місяців тому

    A lot of eignshtien miracle is him just surviving the slaughter all around him. How many geniuses were murdered in the trenches

  • @ericsu4667
    @ericsu4667 3 роки тому

    Einstein graduated from college at 4th place in his class. There were only 5 students in the class. He was only better than his wife who failed to graduate.
    Click on "67. Error In Einstein's Calculation Of Perihelion For Mercury" on this website.
    sites.google.com/view/physics-news/gravitation

  • @balancedabundance70
    @balancedabundance70 5 років тому +2

    The moderator demonstrated that human stupidity is indeed infinite.

  • @dmitryshusterman9494
    @dmitryshusterman9494 8 місяців тому

    The moderator is very annoying, with her ignorant quips

  • @wojkoval7992
    @wojkoval7992 8 років тому +3

    Pretty sure the moderator is drunk.

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Na lúke som sa hral ako mali chlapec 🧒 a slnko rozsvietil lúku zem som videl zdvihnutu oblohu nižšie a čas zastavení mohlo to trvať menej 1 sekúnda 🌞

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Sam neviem čo som nakreslil na bieli výkres modrú farbu jeden chlapec povedal že som zmienil celi vesmír nepamätám si stoho nič len jedno slovo kedy sa to stane viem len jedno že veľmi rad som kreslil atóm ⚛ kvety 88 8 stále som bol vo vedomí že kreslim len jednu 8 atóm

  • @Sharperthanu1
    @Sharperthanu1 7 років тому +1

    No the UNIVERSE isn't infinite.The HYPERSPACE is infinite.

  • @archersterling5919
    @archersterling5919 5 років тому +1

    This discussion really went off the rails when they showed images of Einstein's brain. His idea are interesting to say the least, but I could do without the whole his brain was sliced into pieces and examined part.

  • @klausantitheistbolvig8372
    @klausantitheistbolvig8372 3 роки тому

    The topic is the greatest scientist! But unfortunately he’s is nearly as famous for his resistance against quantum mechanics! He has a point though. Nobody has ever understand the true nature of quantum mechanics! And we actually didn’t try before this century ( Poul Dirac did , and his equation might be a severe candidate to this quest ) but today it is string theory, multiverses etc- but how to test it- right now it’s a philosophical hypothesis- so in a sense not science! It has to be tested measured and predictable!

  • @jeffmacaskill7656
    @jeffmacaskill7656 3 роки тому

    "..Who among all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this? In his hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind." Job 12:9-10 (NIV)
    “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son, so that everyone who believes in Him will not perish, but have eternal life." John 3:16 (NASB)
    "You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart." Jeremiah 29:13 (NIV)
    Near death experiences show us there is an afterlife .. You can watch a video with John Burke here:
    ua-cam.com/video/Dq3xirn7te8/v-deo.html
    You can watch the Alpha film series here: ua-cam.com/video/Kf1TOTRCT1g/v-deo.html
    You can hear the gospel here: www.peacewithgod.net

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Posledná slová z výšky dole 1 v kruhu mali byť všeobecný platné pre celú planétu a ne len v Európe to je stara štruktúra kto kde kedy ktorý aké farby kde kedy sa narodil stále je na planéta Ježiša vo vesmíre mikro štruktúre podobné Einstan kde jedno slovo rozšíri po celom svete myšlienku kde sa z hlavy na hlavu ucha oči srdce a, to ne sú potrebné ani vysoké školy vojenské akadémie zabíjanie alebo prenos obrazu v televízie negatívny signál na mikro štruktúru zbrane filmy ktoré by nemali existovať pre to že sa to ani nemali stať

  • @pacajalbert9018
    @pacajalbert9018 3 роки тому

    Napríklad Stalin 100 kilometrov pred Moskvou vstal z mŕtvych a videl rozšírený obraz vojny nezáleží na armádu zbraní Stalinove slzy keď zlo zaútočí na niekoho kto nemá zbrane tak nevie sa brániť prehrá

  • @mmtindaro742
    @mmtindaro742 4 роки тому +6

    hardly have seen such incompetent lady

  • @mariaasombrada3964
    @mariaasombrada3964 4 роки тому +2

    The journalist is indeed very pushy, loud and annoying.
    Apart from that - great little discussion.

  • @janklaas6885
    @janklaas6885 2 роки тому

    🇺🇳58:53

  • @julietarojas7637
    @julietarojas7637 2 роки тому

    My darling brother and I like to eat rice and vagetable and food and drinks milk bread and eggs plans and peanut butter and because I love you so much to my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother and you understand me now my darling brother and my darling brother and I love you so much to my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother and I safe to my darling baby and my darling brother and I back again to my darling brother and If I finish take a break fast now my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother and I love you so much to my darling brother and my darling baby and my darling brother and I thank you for all understand me now and I love you at all in the name of Jesus Christ heaven a father Amem 😴☺️❤️🤗😘🥰🤩💖💕♥️🙏🙏

  • @ancientpoet6958
    @ancientpoet6958 4 роки тому

    Lol hahahahaha hahahahaha

  • @venkateshbabu5623
    @venkateshbabu5623 6 років тому

    They are murdered and slaughtered.

    • @FlockOfHawks
      @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому

      Who?

    • @venkateshbabu5623
      @venkateshbabu5623 5 років тому

      FlockOfHawks the churners of darkness.

    • @FlockOfHawks
      @FlockOfHawks 5 років тому

      +Venkatesh babu
      That's very sad . . . i think . But why ? And who will churn the darkness when the churners are all gone ? Does Mr Trump know this ? Should we nuke someone ?

  • @allenev.8765
    @allenev.8765 8 років тому +3

    Albert's view of 'god' was a long running joke. Having been forced to declare a religion in order fill in a blank on a form for university employment he was resentful of the imposition of an inferior theory. He invented his own religion and this has been his little joke on theists and atheists alike that he maintained to for the rest of his life. Ignore all his god talk and concentrate on the physics if you want to understand his thinking.

    • @tombeatty4792
      @tombeatty4792 7 років тому

      Einstein was a deist, or possibly a pantheist. He never believed in the God of religion - a God that listens and answers prayers.

    • @allenev.8765
      @allenev.8765 7 років тому

      Deist no. Pantheist yes. But pantheism is reviled by the religious and non-religious. If god is everything then god is nothing.

  • @jamesanonymous2343
    @jamesanonymous2343 4 роки тому

    there is nothing here for a person interested in "E" in a serious way.

    • @johnbremner4154
      @johnbremner4154 4 роки тому

      Why are they not mentioning the title of Einstein’s ‘Theory on the Photoelectric Effect', although they mention ‘the paper’ a number of times?

  • @julietarojas7637
    @julietarojas7637 2 роки тому

    You can not understand me now and you always disstroying me and to my darling brother and my darling baby and you can not understand me now and you always disstroying me my life and my body and I see you now you are shouting the Pana the heads of my teacher and to Tay Tay and I don't know we're I going and because I see my two eyes to see the teams members north point church?

  • @Sharperthanu1
    @Sharperthanu1 7 років тому

    The young Lady who got thrown out of the shopping mall because her sunscreen wouldn't turn clear...

  • @jamessabatini6727
    @jamessabatini6727 4 роки тому

    Please stop saying "right" after you make a point. You don't need to affirm your own point to yourself. It's moronic.

  • @richardfeynman9341
    @richardfeynman9341 4 роки тому

    " The bigger the size, the better is not applied when it comes to Central Nervous System" - Dr. Frederick Lepore
    {Asians approved that} XD

  • @mikejr.garza.7883
    @mikejr.garza.7883 3 роки тому

    Man has failed man.,

  • @tennislegendsonlineretrotennis
    @tennislegendsonlineretrotennis 3 роки тому +1

    The woman is beyond terrible!