There should be NO permanent members. There should be no unilateral VETO power. Also, how does the Russian Federation get to legally sit in what is technically the seat held by the former Soviet Union.? It would seem that chair would have been opened up to make way for a different member state upon the dissolution of the USSR. Instead, the Russian Federation ASSUMED the seat of the USSR. It seems quite clear that the USSR still occupies the seat after all.....only by a different name placard: Russian Federation.
There should be NO permanent members. There should be no unilateral VETO power. Also, how does the Russian Federation get to legally sit in what is technically the seat held by the former Soviet Union.? It would seem that chair would have been opened up to make way for a different member state upon the dissolution of the USSR. Instead, the Russian Federation ASSUMED the seat of the USSR. It seems quite clear that the USSR still occupies the seat after all.....only by a different name placard: Russian Federation.
Zero sounds about right
ZERO?
Yes Zero. You have Russia and China as permanent members of the security council on one side and US France and Britain as member on the other side