No, sensor size does not affect exposure. Exposure is determined by the amount of light that hits a specific point on the sensor, not the total amount of light for the entire area. As long as the camera settings remain the same, the exposure of the final image will be the same regardless of the sensor size. For example, if a micro-4/3rd camera and a full frame camera are both set to 1/60 at f/2.8 and take a picture of the same scene in the same lighting, the exposure will be the same for both cameras.
@@VictorChu-n4d That is not the case. Light capturing area per pixel effects exposure settings significantly. It's the reason that an A7SIII produces brighter images than the previous A7S iterations. The new sensor is multi layer which increases the light capture area by ~15%. Same applies to comparing like sensors that differ in size but not resolution. A smaller sensor will need proportionally more time to have the same exposure when compared to a larger sensor at the same resolution.
i thought the x4 could go up to 6400 in 5.7k and only 1600 when in 8k? you might want to double check that.
You're right, it goes up to 6400 in 5.7K
Thanks!
I wonder if you'd get better results (less juttering) with a higher shutter speed and then brighten the footage in post?
That might be the case.
The 1" is actually over exposed using the same settings due to the larger sensor. I think the 1" won and would of won by a lot if the iso was reduced.
No, sensor size does not affect exposure. Exposure is determined by the amount of light that hits a specific point on the sensor, not the total amount of light for the entire area. As long as the camera settings remain the same, the exposure of the final image will be the same regardless of the sensor size. For example, if a micro-4/3rd camera and a full frame camera are both set to 1/60 at f/2.8 and take a picture of the same scene in the same lighting, the exposure will be the same for both cameras.
I agree that the 1" won though
@@VictorChu-n4d That is not the case. Light capturing area per pixel effects exposure settings significantly. It's the reason that an A7SIII produces brighter images than the previous A7S iterations. The new sensor is multi layer which increases the light capture area by ~15%. Same applies to comparing like sensors that differ in size but not resolution. A smaller sensor will need proportionally more time to have the same exposure when compared to a larger sensor at the same resolution.
1-inch guaranteed good picture quality, but it was heavy to shoot on a bike.
I guess the X4 is better in weight.
not that different in weight. that battery is bigger and heavier now for the X4.
@@DrunkPhotography he is right, its maybe 10% heavier
@@skytechone they’ll find out when the put it on that extended selfie stick and it bends it just like it does for the One RS
X4 200Mbps. One rs 120Mbps. On good light X4 od the winner
RS 1inch is better in dark. But let's be honest, most of us use action camera during the day. Both of cameras are great. But I have chosen X4. 😎
I think the edges of the X4 look terrible.
Just when I was ready to pull the plug on the X4 this RS one shows up. Didn’t even know it existed. Back to square one now : /
i would only get RS 1" if i was shooting in low light
@@skytechone Exclusively am interested in shooting starlit skys. Have you attempted any astrophotography with either?
@@saccaed i havent. but its possible: ua-cam.com/video/0Zy9nNdd1B4/v-deo.html