Yes, its a very capable and well known system. But the title is misleading...compared to what? M109? MSTA-S?... Looks like someone wrote the title without any notice about Artillery Systems in Europe.
I live a few kilometers from a trainingground where they fire this beast, it's freaking LOUD! I can hear the rooftiles ratteling. What's the main purpose for the machinegun on the roof?
An automated, AI controlled drone likely is being worked on. These are expensive, sophisticated weapons platforms. You can't allow a multi-million dollar weapons platform to be taken out by $500 - $5,000 drones. Only better, smarter, AI controlled drones can --- from meters of feet above, in the clearance --- spot on-coming cheap but deadly drones. And, then, you have to have actual anti drone shells (singles or bird-shots) to take them out, as they zero in on your expensive equipment, whose focus is tens of miles away... Tanks & other self propelled artillary all will have to adopt counter measures against drones or you simply can't produce enough of them to be effective in the front line, as shown in Ukraine, by the less powerful Ukrainians, against thousands of old but deadly WW2 Russian tanks and light armored vehicles.
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Först får du hitta en drönare som har en räckvidd upp till 5 mil. Om drönaren gör ca 50 km i timmen tar det en timme för drönaren att nå fram då hittar den inte ett spår efter Archern.
ميزانية حلف الناتو الاوروبي العسكرية لعام ٢٠٢٥ يجب ان تكون ترليون يورو وتعتمد وتركيز على سداسية هي صواريخ الفرط صوطية والغواصات النووية والقاذفات الشبحية والدفاعات الجوية والليزر وحاملات الطائرات اصاطيل والوقاية لمواجهة حرب نووية من خوذ مضادة واماكن محصنة خصوصا لهذه الحروب كما قاعدة البشرية متعددة المهام تعدادها مليونيين عسكري كما ميزانية اميركا وكندا واستراليا واليابان وكوريا الجنوبية ترليون دولار ايضا لنفس التعزيزات العسكرية الاستراتيجية بحث
Due to the glide wings of the precision-guided Raytheon/Bofors M982 Excalibur rounds, the range of the gun is extended to more than 50 kilometres (31 mi). The Excalibur shell is corrected in flight towards a pre-programmed trajectory by a GPS guidance system.
I will be kind to you and include the Latest M109, the M109A7. older M109 Weight 27.5Ton. later versions (M109A7) up to 50 Tons. top speed 56km/h. range 350km. max lateral lean 40%. Vs (SE) Archer 33Ton. Top speed 70km/h. range 650km. Max lateral lean53.2% (28.0°). And (UK) top speed 90 km/h. Range 800 km. Max lateral lean 34.5% (19°). The archer is just better in Every single aspect. a bit more weight does not matter what so ever if the ability to traverse terrain is proven as good or better than the M109. just the fact that they can go more than dubble the distance, 50-90% faster with much faster fireing. *Archer fires 3 rounds in 15 seconds, 20 rounds in 2.5 minutes.* while the latest *M109 A7* only does a maximum of *4 rounds per minute.* Archer *480* rounds per hour. M109A7 *240* rounds per hour. It's night and day. Archer just outclasses M109 in just about all aspects.
That's why it is on a hauler chassis. That stuff works on dumpers in mines, so it goes anywhere. Would not surprise me if it is a Haldex 6WD either but not sure.
(SE) Archer 33Ton. Top speed 70km/h. range 650km. Max lateral lean53.2% (28.0°). And (UK) top speed 90 km/h. Range 800 km. Max lateral lean 34.5% (19°). Compare it to the M109, Weight 27.5Ton. later versions (M109A7) up to 50 Tons. top speed 56km/h. range 350km. max lateral lean 40%. The archer is extremely manuverable and stable. with great ability to treverse all kinds of terrain.
Right! UK gets half of the credit. Much of the Swedish military industry is co-owned by the UK, and a lot of the Swedish designed hardware is produced in the UK.
Not a lot of the Swedish Designed hardware is produced in the UK. And I wouldn't say much is co-owned by the UK either, SAAB for example is not co-owned by the UK.
Most is not co-owned and most is not produced in the uk. It's good that we work together. But Do not let it diminish the Work the Swedes do and the inovations they have made.
Only the most recent Archer Version C (eg. Archer 8x8) is designed and procured partly by the UK department of BAE. The Archer Version A/B are Swedish.
First of all try to state your opinion in an understandable language, second make sure it's a intelligent statement, third we will then make your day to "goodbye cruel world" 😮😂😊😱👻👽
Archer always hits right on Target,just like a Well trained Sniper🇸🇪
In self defence the weapons station can be used a direct line of sight fire control for the gun including a laser range finder.
Proste rozwiązania są piękne. Dobry system! Idea haubicy działać z dystansu. Szybko strzelać a potem zmienić pozycję.
155mm砲弾の装填はさぞ大変だろうと思いきや、かなり自動化されているんですね。
アウトリガーの展開から砲身の可動、射撃、撤収までかなり素早い行動が可能のようですので、相手側からするとかなり厄介な榴弾砲で。
(そしてさらっと配備先にウクライナが)
I saw the unit patches on the uniforms. This unit is from A9 (9th Artillery regiment) wich is currently reestablishing in Kristinehamn.
Thank you 🙏 for sharing ☝️impressive and nice 👍 less stress for victory ✌️👍👋☮️
Sniper artillery 😮😎
Yes, its a very capable and well known system. But the title is misleading...compared to what? M109? MSTA-S?...
Looks like someone wrote the title without any notice about Artillery Systems in Europe.
I live a few kilometers from a trainingground where they fire this beast, it's freaking LOUD! I can hear the rooftiles ratteling.
What's the main purpose for the machinegun on the roof?
Defence against infantry
An automated, AI controlled drone likely is being worked on. These are expensive, sophisticated weapons platforms.
You can't allow a multi-million dollar weapons platform to be taken out by $500 - $5,000 drones. Only better, smarter, AI controlled drones can --- from meters of feet above, in the clearance --- spot on-coming cheap but deadly drones. And, then, you have to have actual anti drone shells (singles or bird-shots) to take them out, as they zero in on your expensive equipment, whose focus is tens of miles away...
Tanks & other self propelled artillary all will have to adopt counter measures against drones or you simply can't produce enough of them to be effective in the front line, as shown in Ukraine, by the less powerful Ukrainians, against thousands of old but deadly WW2 Russian tanks and light armored vehicles.
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Först får du hitta en drönare som har en räckvidd upp till 5 mil. Om drönaren gör ca 50 km i timmen tar det en timme för drönaren att nå fram då hittar den inte ett spår efter Archern.
ميزانية حلف الناتو الاوروبي العسكرية لعام ٢٠٢٥ يجب ان تكون ترليون يورو وتعتمد وتركيز على سداسية هي صواريخ الفرط صوطية والغواصات النووية والقاذفات الشبحية والدفاعات الجوية والليزر وحاملات الطائرات اصاطيل والوقاية لمواجهة حرب نووية من خوذ مضادة واماكن محصنة خصوصا لهذه الحروب كما قاعدة البشرية متعددة المهام تعدادها مليونيين عسكري كما ميزانية اميركا وكندا واستراليا واليابان وكوريا الجنوبية ترليون دولار ايضا لنفس التعزيزات العسكرية الاستراتيجية بحث
主持人加油加油加油加油加油🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
アーティキュレートダンプトラックに砲塔くっ付けた感じみたい
Well it is. It is based on the chassis of a Volvo dump truck.
To jest trabant wywrotka
Archer anti-arritola artillery a arritola's house
That's because it is....
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
maybe archer is a better joice than panzerhaubize 2000
wie weit ist die Schussreichweite vom Schwedisches Archer?
yes its swedish
@@Benderswe1 50km with Excalibur
@@andersmalmgren6528 k sry läste inte ordentligt 8-)
not sure you are accurate in your description certainly not by visual description i not even own one could do better talking about it
故障とメンテだけ気になりますが、後方での整備さえ出来るのであれば省力化、省人化が期待できますね。
Breakdowns? It's a Swedish product, the land of Volvo, and based on a dumper chassis. It won't breakdown that easy.
does it work with a radar system???
No...
@Koorvkungen then how does it work??? How do they determine the longitude and latitude of the desired target???
It can work together with artillery hunting radar. Otherwise you get coordinates from forward observers, drones etc.
Due to the glide wings of the precision-guided Raytheon/Bofors M982 Excalibur rounds, the range of the gun is extended to more than 50 kilometres (31 mi). The Excalibur shell is corrected in flight towards a pre-programmed trajectory by a GPS guidance system.
@@Koorvkungen it works with radar and artillery / sensor systems and satellite in real time sat link guidance.
🇸🇪👍👍👍👍💪💪💪💪👊👊👊👊🫡
ВаУУУУУУУ. 😮. 😳
おお、撤収が速い。
着弾のシーンも見てみたいですよね。
撮るのが発射の100倍面倒かと思いますが。。
この規模だし、車台が大型ダンプだからしょうがないっちゃしょうがないけど、33トンとか装軌のM109より重いって相当だなあ
Archer fires over 10 k further further more is not made in aluminum and is far easier in logistics and maintenance.
I will be kind to you and include the Latest M109, the M109A7.
older M109 Weight 27.5Ton. later versions (M109A7) up to 50 Tons. top speed 56km/h. range 350km. max lateral lean 40%.
Vs (SE) Archer 33Ton. Top speed 70km/h. range 650km. Max lateral lean53.2% (28.0°).
And (UK) top speed 90 km/h. Range 800 km. Max lateral lean 34.5% (19°).
The archer is just better in Every single aspect.
a bit more weight does not matter what so ever if the ability to traverse terrain is proven as good or better than the M109.
just the fact that they can go more than dubble the distance, 50-90% faster with much faster fireing.
*Archer fires 3 rounds in 15 seconds, 20 rounds in 2.5 minutes.* while the latest *M109 A7* only does a maximum of *4 rounds per minute.*
Archer *480* rounds per hour. M109A7 *240* rounds per hour.
It's night and day.
Archer just outclasses M109 in just about all aspects.
장점: 차륜형
단점: 차륜형
Advantage: Wheeled type
Disadvantage: Wheeled type
荷重が超後方なので、運転が大変そうだ。
That's why it is on a hauler chassis. That stuff works on dumpers in mines, so it goes anywhere. Would not surprise me if it is a Haldex 6WD either but not sure.
(SE) Archer 33Ton. Top speed 70km/h. range 650km. Max lateral lean53.2% (28.0°).
And (UK) top speed 90 km/h. Range 800 km. Max lateral lean 34.5% (19°).
Compare it to the M109, Weight 27.5Ton. later versions (M109A7) up to 50 Tons. top speed 56km/h. range 350km. max lateral lean 40%.
The archer is extremely manuverable and stable. with great ability to treverse all kinds of terrain.
@@lovehagglund3234 65 kms se sera déjà pas mal. 650 un peu de trop . Déjà qu’avant on nous parlait de 50 kms😮 5:49
Right! UK gets half of the credit. Much of the Swedish military industry is co-owned by the UK, and a lot of the Swedish designed hardware is produced in the UK.
Not a lot of the Swedish Designed hardware is produced in the UK. And I wouldn't say much is co-owned by the UK either, SAAB for example is not co-owned by the UK.
Most is not co-owned and most is not produced in the uk. It's good that we work together. But Do not let it diminish the Work the Swedes do and the inovations they have made.
Yes produced=ensamled in the UK , invented in Sweden.....
Only the most recent Archer Version C (eg. Archer 8x8) is designed and procured partly by the UK department of BAE. The Archer Version A/B are Swedish.
가장 큰 장약으로 쏴주세요
சீக்கிரம் கொண்டு வாருங்கள் எங்களுக்கு (ரஷ்யா) மேலும் ஒரு தீபாவளி நாள் கிடைத்தது 😂😂😂
Sweden here again.: Most of us do not understand the meaning, explain thank You.
First of all try to state your opinion in an understandable language, second make sure it's a intelligent statement, third we will then make your day to "goodbye cruel world" 😮😂😊😱👻👽
It is neither the fastest, the best or the most powerful howitzer! 🙄
🤣🤣🤣👎👎👎 Всё равно горит Слава России! ❤
✊🏻👍🏻