You Won't Believe What's in the Original King James Bible!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 чер 2022
- This is for my fellow brothers and sisters who are confused about the original 1611 King James Bible. The current KJV that people have is the 17th edition of the KJV since the year it was published in 1611.
YOU CAN SUPPORT US: pay.cornerstone.cc/wordsfromt...
Listen to our Podcast: open.spotify.com/show/3WBSSFO...
Any translation is useless without the true translator. The Spirit of Truth!
Amen
Amen 🙏
Amen 🙏
Yes , The Holy Spirit of Truth.
Interpretor, not translator, but yeah. And yes of course the Holy Spirit also provides translation too (like "speaking in tongues") but in the case you were making you meant "interpreter"
I was 16 , sitting alone in a cell on Christmas eve in 1999. I was consumed by rage and in a dark place, though the lights never turned off. We were visited by a Christian group bearing gifts, of which I was given two. The first was a beanie baby kangaroo, which I was not allowed to take back to my cell, but I got back upon my release and have to this day. The second was far more valuable. As I sat there, some tough kid with a plushie, I was given compassion and a message of God's love for us all. That night, I knelt over my block of a bed, and I prayed to God for forgiveness of my sins. It felt silly at first to think of myself doing this, but as I prayed aloud I felt this indescribable feeling. All the darkness within was gone, and I felt uplifted. I had given myself to God and accepted Jesus as savior in the wee hours of Christmas morning. I was forever changed before I stepped into 2000. All the blessings I have in my life, from that day to this and as many more as I may see, I owe to the glory of God, who has set a path for me and provides all that I need to walk it.
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Welcome to the fold, my brother!
The best testimony I ever heard! 🕊️
God is so good! So happy you found him. Praise the Lord!
If you get confused just come to Jesus as your Lord and Saviour,come as you are,knock and it shall be opened unto you
Can’t wait to just be on the other side. Tired of the disputes I just want Truth.
I hear that.
ive been to all kinds of churches and seen some of the most juvenile behavior and insane doctrinal views imaginable.
At this point we only go to church for fellowship ONLY. I dont allow my wife to be taught by people I dont trust.
She's reading the bible for herself, thank goodness. about half way thru the OT as Im typing this.
U can get truth now, he is trying to deceive but all one have to do is read some of the apocrypha and u will see it doesn't sound like the rest of scripture like somebody just inserted it there. God gives us this time on earth to seek the truth. It will be too late on the other side
@@OneChurch-cg6xwyou're a little crazy equally as someone whos too much interested and attracted to looking for aliens which are demons.
Amen the debates are tiring! Protestants can't agree with each other. Now imagine how all Christians debate. That's why the. Catholic Church is true to dispense authority when needed!
Define truth please
Calm down everyone, reading the apocrypha won't make you the devil
😂😂 For Real
why would i want to read it
@@kimba8953why wouldn't you?
@@kimba8953because it is the original translation, the first book brought overseas until the Catholic Church took books out.. what you mean
not interested then 😂
Jesus is the only way...Amen
Amen
🤔LUKE-4-8😮
Yes indeed..Amen..🙏
@@legionsarecoming4-u371
Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
1John 2:23 KJV
Big facts
I have a 1611. I am a Christian, awesomely saved by Jesus Christ and born again- Hallelujah. Praise God for His grace and for wildly saving people like me who had not been in His church, had not read His word, and had not sat and talked with His kids. How awesome He is. I recommend seeking out testimonies from those who were saved straight out of darkness like me- the good hand and power of God. There is revelation and clarity revealed in these testimonies and they will tell you about the workings of the devil's deceptions and about the religions, dividing the good truth from what is not. They will tell you things that those who grew up in even the christian church might not have had eyes for. Testimonies are always so awesome. See the things that God has done. : ) Bless the Lord who is good. Bless Jesus who is coming again - Hallelujah.
Unfortunately the christian religion created by constabtine denounces everything the messiah and torah stands for. Have you read constantines creed? Christianty is derived from catholocism.. which in no way follows the commands of Yahuah.. the elohim mans traditions are what condems men. You may want to find truth Yah bless
Christianity is not in any way to write derived from Catholicism are you insane @@ew332
@@JesusDiedForYou-7 God is a pagan term for the greek sun god. Most people dont know Yahuah. Who is the creator and Yahusha.. the son and messiah. Psalms 68 bares his name Yah. The letter j was created in the 1500's.. and jesus is a name of iesus. A greek pagan god.
The 1611 KJV contains no letter J .
The BYNV is corrected scripture with the correct names.
Yah bless
@@ew332 Congrats. I don’t really care. I speak English, God is all powerful. I don’t worship Allah who can’t have his book translated. Thanks. Don’t push that on people, that weird niche theology/doctrine that doesn’t matter. Keep it to yourself, it’ll be okay.
@@ew332 King James Bible is perfect, thanks. Watch “Truth is Christ” UA-cam channel. The term “King James Bible” adds up to 119 in ordinal English gematria. 119 is the heart of the Bible. You can’t refute the King James. The harder you try, the worse it will be for you.
1 Corinthians 2:2 “For I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.”
Let me tell you why the original 1611 KJV contained the Apocrypha:
The King James Bible was put out _(officially speaking)_ by the Anglican Church of England. It was translated by 54 Anglican scholars; half of which were Bishops, and half of which were Puritans. So what did the Church of England believe concerning the canon of inspired Scripture? Take a look at this paragraph in the sixth article of the Anglican _Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion:_
*VI. Of the Sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for Salvation.*
"And the other Books (as Hierome saith) the Church doth read *_for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine;_* such are these following:
The Third Book of Esdras The Fourth Book of Esdras The Book of Tobias The Book of Judith The rest of the Book of Esther The Book of Wisdom Jesus the Son of Sirach Baruch the Prophet The Song of the Three Children The Story of Susanna Of Bel and the Dragon The Prayer of Manasses The First Book of Maccabees The Second Book of Maccabees"
You can read the entire sixth article online if you want. But as you can see, the Church of England did NOT accept the Apocrypha as inspired Scripture. This is why the translators placed the Apocrypha _IN BETWEEN_ the Old and New Testaments. They did _not_ place the Apocryphal books in the Old Testament canon as the Catholic Church does. Therefore, the Apocrypha was never actually printed _IN_ the King James Bible, it was printed _WITH_ the King James Bible.
So in conclusion: the translators printed the Apocrpyah with the King James Bible simply because it has historical value and good wisdom in it. Nobody believed it was inspired Scripture.
But what really matters the most is... _what do the Scriptures say about the Apocrypha?_ Let me show you:
Luke 24:44 (KJV) And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the *_law of Moses,_* and in *_the prophets,_* and in *_the psalms,_* concerning me.
In this verse, Jesus Christ lays out the official canon of the Hebrew Bible the same exact way the Jews do:
_The Law of Moses = The Torah._
_The Prophets = The Nabhim._
_The Psalms = The Kethubim._
These three sections of the Hebrew Bible make up the entire 39 books of the Hebrew O.T. _(the Apocrypha is not included)._
It is also worth noting that the Apocryphal books were never quoted by Jesus Christ or the Apostles.
Also, the Septuagint, being a collection of corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts and the *_only_* manuscripts that the Apocryphal books are found in, is dated to be from around 350 A.D. at the very earliest, which is well after the entire New Testament was completed.
This proves that the Apocrypha is not inspired Scripture.
Fantastic Information. Thanks for sharing.
If you can read Sirach and Wisdom of Solomon and think that there are not almost exact paraphrases of statements and themes from these writings found in the words of Christ, Paul, and James, then your ability to render meaning and substance from text is severely limited. But you are confident. I’ll give you that.
@@tonywolfemusic5920 Wrong. Neither Jesus Christ nor the Apostles quote the Apocrypha. It's the other way around, the Apocrypha is what quotes Jesus Christ and the Apostles.
As I stated in my comment, the Apocrypha is only found in the Greek Septuagint. Contrary to popular belief, the Septuagint is NOT from B.C. The earliest Septuagint we have is from 350 A.D.
On top of that, the Greek Septuagint is a collection of false, satanic Alexandrian manuscripts. They are the exact same manuscripts that the modern corrupt Bibles are translated from.
But aside from all of that, there are SEVERAL reasons why neither Jesus Christ nor the Apostles would have used the Septuagint. I can get into that if you want me to, and I can also show you some contradictions found in the Apocrypha if you want me to, but as for this comment, I'll end it here.
@AnthonyTuminello - Thank you for the blessing that you are for writing this. You are certainly are workman needing not to be ashamed. May the Lord our God continue to bless you and others through your knowledge, discernment, and understanding of our Lord’s perfect word.
@@KingJamesBibleSword I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,
Romans 9:1 KJV
Thank you for the kind words, I really appreciate that. To God and his perfect word - _the King James Bible_ - be the glory!
What KJV 1611 translators wrote : "Apocrypha"
What the KJV critique read : "Deuterocanonical".
Thank you. I'm looking through the comments for people correcting the ignorance on this. 😅
@CynHicks
Can't all be as brilliant as you, right?
@@christinemiller1946 Sure you can; and much more so. Just put the effort in and be open to edification. Thanks for the compliment by the way. I don't consider myself to be brilliant but I'm definitely intelligent because of the gifts God gave me, including a desire to learn. God also humbled me back when I was an atheist such that I'm willing to accept my ignorance instead of defending it or becoming haughty once it's pointed out. I used to become prideful when someone pointed out my ignorance but I cherish it now.
You're right. They proof read it for typos in 1769. The KJV is also the translation to English. All these other translations add or subtract words to water down The Truth
@@CynHicksHalleluYah 🔥 👑 🕊
I, Gary Hall profess with my lips to love and worship Our Lord Jesus Christ,The Holy Spirit and The Almighty God forever and ever amen 🙏🙏💖💖🙌🙏🙏🙏💖🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙏
Hallelujah
You forgot the Father but I’m glad to hear it
Did you know Jesus is not his real name . Look it up in the Greek Bible . For in the Bible it tells us his children will know my name . When we say Jesus we are worshipping a false God . His almighty name is Yahuah , Yahusha. When he walked in this earth he was called by his true name Yahuah.
@@doreenacord2458 Jesus/Greek = lesous. Jesus/Hebrew = Yeshua, translates to English Joshua. Yahweh/Yahuah/Hebrew = the only name of the only God. I like to use the name God told Moses, Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh/Hebrew "I AM THAT I AM" Exodus 3:14 KJV.
@@doreenacord2458 yes I know His real name is YESHUA and I'm English and not Greek. Is it a problem to you ? My name is Gary and everyone that knows me calls me whitey ( nickname)
Most people can't even follow the simple guidance:
Micah 6:8 KJV
"He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?"
The Lord our God can take any evil and turn it around for the good of His own and most of all, for the glory of Jesus Christ. That goes for flawed translations of His Word. He speaks His pure Word right into the hearts of His elect. Holy, Holy, Holy is the Most High. Hallelujah
💯🗣️
Best comment here!
Amen
The 1611 KJV uses textus receptus manuscripts, not the majority text. But, besides that, it is not more accurate than other manuscripts.
For example the KJV Bible which removed several manuscripts by a sect created because aman wanted to divorce his wife and then liked several of his wives. Rejecting the Bible that had been established for over a thousand years.
Those who are caught up in legalism will not enter the pearly gates. It is only by grace you are saved.
What you mean ?
Faith without work is dead@@sergiomissaglia6380
Paul said "what then, shall we do away with the law? Heaven forbid! We should establish it".
Also from Paul "it is bot the hearers of the law who will be righteous, it is the doers of the law".
Also Paul "live in the spirit, not the flesh".
Also Paul "the law is spiritual".
Jesus "not one jot or one tittle from the law will be changed, until heaven and earth ceases to exist".
Also Jesus "if you love me, keep my commandments".
Also Jesus "and ALL OF THE LAW is attached to these commandments".
@@-kepha8828 true... the more you keep the commandments and the more you begin to hear from the spirit
@@-kepha8828 , true but has nothing to do with our salvation...its a free gift
Originally, the Apocrypha was removed because it was never considered divinely inspired by GOD, therefore it was not accepted as part of the original canon of Holy Scripture.
It was included in that KJV, placed BETWEEN the OT and NT, STRICTLY BASED ON ITS HISTORICAL VALUE BY SOME.
HOWEVER, further study proves the Apocrypha not only contradicts the Bible, but even contradicts itself.
Other reasons it was rejected include: The books were not originally written in Hebrew as was the OT. None of the writers claimed "divine inspiration." They were never accepted by the early Jewish Church. Etc.
The Catholic Church is the only denomination that fully accepts it.
Calling the Apocrypha part of Scripture is like saying BECAUSE the INDEX is CONTAINED IN the Bible, it is divinely inspired by GOD.
In case you wonder, NO, IT IS NOT! And neither was the Apocrypha.
Be careful what you "believe" on UA-cam. Most people do NOT take the time to research and confirm what they post.
I've been a Christian for 54 years, and have heard it all. The difference is, I DO THE RESEARCH from multiple sources and do CONSIDER THE SOURCE.
The things I've seen and read...😱
Thank you for this!
Martin Luther was the one to decided that the apocrypha wasn't inspired. So who the hell gave him that right.
IDK about that. I think it was removed to reduce the cost of printing. To produce a Bible for the masses you need to make it as cheap as possible. Considering that all the church fathers believed it was a good idea to read the Apocrypha I’m not sure your explanation makes any sense.
Been a Christian for 54 years, and hasn't come to the knowledge of truth.
AMEN....!
Jesus Christ has risen. 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 } The Catholics do idolatry
That was a dumb statement.
@@jesuschristsaves9067
Only 2 a 🤡like you.
@@jesuschristsaves9067
Your icon emoji says, { Jesus Christ Saves }
Sadly you have no idea about the risen Christ at all. Sigh*
@@jesuschristsaves9067
You must be a Deceiver, I bet you are.
@@bentheredonethat-lx6nh dumb assertion.
Exactly! And I'm not claiming that it is divinely inspired, but they are a great historical and great insight to what others who lived in that time experienced or the stories they knew. Pray for discernment.
Nobody’s surprised. The translators did not consider the apocrypha scripture, and included those books between the testaments, not mixed into the Old Testament.
None of its scripture😂Christianity is just like any other religion just a cult
Wrong.@@nickt2559
@@nickt2559 you, as an unbeliever, know nothing about what is or is not Scripture.
@@s0la.scr1ptura first off you don't know me, and you are proving my point when I said Christians are the most judgemental people in the world 🤦 I used to be an indoctrinated brainwashed Cultist Christian like you until I actually started doing research instead of just believing what I was told to believe. And trust me I spent over 10 years of doing extensive research so I probably know more about your man written scriptures than you do 👌
@@s0la.scr1ptura👍🏼Hopefully he knows when to change his big boy, pull-ups.
Yes, but it is clearly labeled as apocrypha which is helpful in discerning what is God breathed scripture and what is not. One can gain insight from the apocrypha as well as other texts that aren’t canon. The RCC, on the other hand, presents the apocrypha as inspired. It isn’t.
Exactly, dishonest for him not mentioning that little fact.
Apocrypha was a man made label. Which began the aid of hiding books which are and aren't. Many were Yah's ordained scriptures. But the Fauccis which elevated themselves above the Father told us "Don't worry trust us, we are the word" ("churchianity")
@@SometimeAgo65 I already have.
Did God tell you He breathed that? Or do you trust the church to tell you that?
@@theurbanthirdhomestead 2 Timothy 3:16 (KJV)
[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
[17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
The Old Testament is the same exact books as the Jewish Bible. The books found in the Apocrypha claim to be additional books that are not in the Jewish Bible, they therefore were rejected and are not Canon.
When the Jewish canon was being assembled two different versions emerged. One was the Hebrew Tanakh as we know it today and the other, used by Hellenized Jewish communities outside of 1st Century Palestine, was the Greek Septuagint. Early Christian leaders included many from the Hellenized Jewish community, so when the Church was assembling the official canon that would become the Christian Bible, they decided to use the Septuagint. Later on, Protestant theologians decided, in order to render a faithful translation of Scripture, to go back to the source languages only to find that the texts that have come to be known as the Apocrypha had no extant Hebrew texts available to translate them from, so they came to be disregarded in Protestant churches.
JESUS loves you. JESUS died for our sins. He wants to have a closer relationship with you. JESUS is coming soon. you can have a closer relationship with JESUS by becoming a born-again Christian and also by reading your Bible daily. Heaven and hell are real. Personal relationships with Jesus will help make heaven
Yahuah
“You are my friends if you do what I command.” John 15,14
Born again means doing what God wants us to do.
@@LandaverdeJR and what does scripture tell us to do?
Keep the sabbath and feasts and obey the commandments.
It doesnt tell tell you to follow mans traditions.
@@LandaverdeJR
John 6:28 (KJV) Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
John 6:29 (KJV) Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
I have that Oxford University press 1611 that you are pointing to.
The Hendrickson 1611 is the same text as that Oxford University press you have.
Finally someone else understands that not all KJVs are created equal.
Yeah, it's an 1833 retypeset by Oxford, which Hendrickson reprints.
@fnjesusfreak the reprint is perfect because most people can't read Gothic black letter.
@@Mr-pn2eh The only problem is that some people don't realize (like, duh, honestly) it's a retypeset from 1833.
Good information for anyone who doesn’t know this. Nothing wrong with this being presented to people for knowledge and reference.
the OLDES Christian Bible is the Ethiopian Bible, older than the oldes King James, and no books were removed from the Ethiopian Bible
Any word on how it differs from KJV?
I loved the Apocrypha! I had it! But years ago the WatchTower of Jehovah’s Witnesses came through my home (I was a newly baptized JW and quite young) and made me get rid of it, saying “demons” worked through it. It was a work of Art in the Douay Catholic Bible I had been given as a gift from my parents on my 21st birthday. I regret my listening to or ever have being involved with WT.
Just ask God to remove all regrets by HIS HOLY BLOOD. 1 John 1:9.
Iam sorry you are lost. Jehovah witnesses !! It is a cult
Yeah, I had a clarinet, too; somebody said I should get rid of, so they sold it for peanuts at the flea market, BUT (as much as I DID enjoy that old clarinet) it is GONE! and the SALVATION, the understanding, the closeness to Jesus I encountered and the LIFE I have been able to live since, are - in no way - "worthy to be compared" with what reading and memorizing parts of ONLY the Book of John have given me.
The "...spirit maketh alive..."
That ole clarinet, much as I liked holding it in my hands, is, long since, water under the bridge ... like so many OTHER things I have needed to let go of: (Luke 14:33, KJV)
Now, with a guitar, I can SING and play, at the same time. That is EXACTLY what I plan to do, even if my voice maybe "croaky": keep on singing 🎶"of the mercies of the Lord, With my mouth...🎵", till I, myself, croak.
@@reyhudson563 you are so Beloved of God!
Cult of Watcht👁wer
You have a Recreation 1611. Therefore, you don't have a 1611 King James Bible either. You have a Recreation. 😉
Hello Santiago this is not a re-creation this book was printed before is bn's were even issued I am 70 years old and this Bible belong to my great-great-grandmother but I do not have a re-creation
Technically isn't that every bible in the world even other versions the only original is the first one made the author and all the others are copies.
The oldest kjv 1611 I have is only from 1975
I think that's what he said. 'I have a 1611 recreation'.😳
They do print the 1611 KJV untouched and the Geneva Bible. I plan to grow my library and Get both! Great for deeper studies.
The apocryphal books were included in between the testaments. They were never held as Canon by the translators or the early church fathers which is why they were removed in 1885 I believe .
I went to Bible college and learned that it was in the original King James Bible, because it was required at the time. King James simply paid the translators. The translators wanted to honor him. King James was in love with only his wife. There was a man who worked with the translators early on and either left or was fired I don't remember. This man claimed in 1650 that King James was a homosexual. King James died in 1625.
People have, and always will, look for ways to discredit the Bible. For them, it's a full-time job.
Just as GOD works through people, so does Satan.
We must read the Bible for ourselves, and listen to and read the writings of those who have proven to line up with Scripture. We must be ready in season to defend the TRUTH of the ONE WHO IS TRUTH!!!
King James was not a homosexual!
@@Linda-sk9hlAMEN sister!🙏🕊️
We know that, youll be surprised to know that kjv took the apocrypha books out of the inpired sections and put them in the middle of old and new testament when those books were written chronologically
The Bible IS NOT in chronological order in the first place, even without the apochrypha. Good Grief😂
😁 i have an original 1611 the pages are crumbling and The Binding has worn it was my great-grandmother's
That’s extremely rare.
would you plz photocopy it and distribute to those who need it the most
@@theodoratesha7065 you can buy photo copies.
@@jerrylisby3440 off course dear
NO, YOU DO *NOT* HAVE AN ORIGINAL 1611 KJV BIBLE!!!!!!!
OMG! People! The word “apocrypha” means questionable or of doubtful origin. The KJV translators were simply being honest when they included it.
These books are accepted by the High Episcopal denomination, too.
The only difference is that their priests are permitted to marry. (As opposed to Roman Catholic priests)
I must say, I use the NIV.
I am quite surprised to find the apocrypha in the 1611 KJV
@@georgemurphy2579 There's not blanket ban on priestly marriage. Eastern Rite Roman Catholics and clergy that convert to the Latin Rite (for example, married Anglican priests) are allowed to marry as long as they do so before taking holy orders.
@@WC3isBetterThanReforgedthere should not be a ban on marriage between a man and a woman, regardless of their chosen profession....including Catholic priests.
@@georgemurphy2579 Priestly celibacy comes from 1 cor 7 where Paul shows a preference for celibacy which echoes Matthew 19.
From what I recall Today we use the 1769 edition of the KJV. it’s mostly the spelling of the words that changed from the old English to the archaic. The same way the KJVs printed in the UK and USA are different to accommodate the different spelling of words.
Different denominations in the church are like everything else: political in nature.
These " " HOLY COUNCILS " " were fighting amongst each other and that's why these are no longer considered scripture by the holy ROMAN RELION OF HELL
it's still modern english and its' still arachic.. anyhow, the british spelling must stay.. or else, it's not a KJV.
Actually, they're not (with the exception of deviant printings like those of ABS). Most American-produced KJVs still use the UK spellings.
This is interesting to hear. Is there anywhere digitally I can look at the original 1611 text?
Reading the kjv Bible make your face shine like Moses. The kjv Bible makes me feel at peace when i read it. Compare Hebrews 4 kjv with the modern Bibles and see how the modern Bible have changed the Hebrews 4.
Sure buddy: because the Modern translations have corrected the misstranslations of the 1611 kjv and the problem of translating the Greek from the Latin and then to 1611 English which is backward because they didn't have all the manuscripts we have today.
KJV used greek and hebrew not latin. That's cahtolism@@davidjanbaz7728
the new bibkes are corrupted@@davidjanbaz7728
why are you reading translations? if you were religious you would be reading in the original languages to get the real text.
I only need the KJV
I just bought the last KJV 1611 Oxford print. So glad I stumble into your page .
Where did you get it?
I inherited my family’s 1611’s original KJV. I have had it tested. It’s been in my family for centuries.
So this isn’t true
That is awesome. 😊Happy inheritance
The apocrypha was found in the dead sea scrolls. The problem with society today is that they follow religion over the Bible. You can’t take or add anything to the scriptures.
Martin Luther removed the apocrypha because he said it wasn’t inspired by God
What makes him above an elder in Israel?
If you’re following a Bible, without Apocrypha, you are following protestant reformation “Calvinism“ “Lutheran doctrine“
I am not a Catholic for the record
Septuagint for the win! Codex Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, and Vaticanus also back up the Dead Sea Scrolls with that.
Jesus said only pray to God, Evan Jesus preyed, and it was to God, Jesus was not god
When it comes down to what book we should trust and believe we should all ask Jesus in Prayer about it..I prayed and asked Jesus myself and He answered me in scripture in the KJV Bible..Jesus showed me Truth in the KJV Bible that all other translations do not have..in the Book of Luke for example..when Peter is walking on the Road to Emmaus and Jesus is a resurrected and Peter and the other disciple are sad and pouting and have given up hope..Jesus winds up back at their house and breaks bread with them to eat..and their eyes are opened and they realize it's Jesus..and He disappears then reappears to Thomas and all the disciples in the upper room and Here's why King James .Jesus says I am not a Ghost..do Ghosts eat?? Have Ye anything to eat? They say yes Lord..Broiled Fish and Honey Comb..this Honey comb and broiled fish is very important and is not found in other texts.. the broiled fish and honey comb is what he eats with them to prove to Thomas and all that He is not a Ghost..and remember He first breaks bread with Peter to open Peter's eyes that it is Him (Jesus) and He is Risen and is Alive..there is a great mystery and lesson hidden here..and those 2 foods (broiled fish and honey comb) are very important and they give credit to other texts and other books being Validated in this story in scripture..book of Enoch and Jude.. brothers and sisters ask and seek and Pray and talk to Jesus..and remember to hear from and have communion with The Lord you have to first have 100 percent solid Faith in Him in order to hear from Him on certain levels..but always talk to Jesus before man!🙏💯
Lol. You dont even know what biblical truth is. So let me help you, with the word of God:
Psalm 119:142 "My LAW is the TRUTH".
@@-kepha8828 lol? What's funny? What would be funny about someone not knowing biblical truth if they didn't? What would be funny about another being jealous of the man and accusing that man of not knowing biblical Truth simply because the accuser wants attention and wants to discourage the true man of God who hears from and talks to God.. nothing funny about it . All I Know comes from The True Word of God...Jesus Christ...I pray you too will hear from Him and turn to Him..and be led by His Spirit and His Word...no need to attack or insult the brethren..unless you are of the devil and not of the brothers and sisters and body of Christ...in that case I pray you turn to God..if you're a devil then I pray the Lord Rebuke you.
@@thephil.e.mintcoinclub quit acting like a clown
Funny he told me to go with the orthodox bible 😂
The book of Enoch is not inspired Scripture, it teaches flat earth and 10 levels of heaven. Neither of which are in line with Scripture nor are they scientifically and geographically correct. Are there 6 gates to heaven in the East and 6 gates to heaven in the West where the sun, moon and stars all rise and set on earth? No. There's not. Enoch is not inspired.
The KJV translated the shorter version of Tobit. And it’s also missing the Third and Fourth Maccabees.
Jesus died for our sins, was buried, then rose from the dead 3 days later so that we may have eternal life. If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord & believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. (Repentance & baptism are also important!!) I pray & ask for eternal life, living water, & holy olive oil over you & your family bloodline; in Jesus' name, Amen. 🙏🏻🖤✝️
It’s amazing to me that people think some guys in the 1600’s who actually wrote many different versions of the King James Bible before they finally settled on one think they have the most accurate book in the world. Yet they ignore the translators today who are much better educated with resources they didn’t have 400 years ago. It’s almost like people can only believe what they are told to believe in echo chambers called churches.
I agree. Many of our translations today are far truer to the original text based on extant manuscript evidence. I attend a Baptist church that is KJV and I carry a LSB and actually read it when scripture is read. Many times the meaning is totally different between the two and many times it’s basically the same. Nevertheless I love reading what is most accurate and truest to the original.
The Majority Text manuscript was not used in the King James New Testament, it was the Testus Receptus. The Masoretic Hebrew text was used for the Old Testament and the Greek Septuagint was used to translate the Apocrypha.
It's an HONEST translation... wanna blow your mind? Read Isaiah 45:7, then look at Genesis at the (2) accounts of man's appearing... one says 'created' (God) and the other 'formed' (LORD God). This is the 'us' in Genesis, and the basis for my ministry, the DOUBLE EDGE SWORD and how to RIGHTLY DIVIDE the 'Word'. Shalom!!
What's your point?
'Created' could imply you were just put on a mantel to display as vanity before guests. 'Formed' insinuates that the affection is brought to life to speak of his/ her own conviction of said-Word, as inspired by the Handler of The Body.
@@cantneygessner691 or it could simply be telling us how life started, who started life and the method used. Created implies intelligence, order and design etc. God created implies authority and ownership, and God formed implies something more personal, physical and direct, purposefully and intentionally interacting with.
Formed like the potter and his clay also dictates precision & dexterity@@squeaksohko5863
@ChrisMusante I still ask for answers about those two verses in Genesis, seems the first one says both were created equally, the second Eve by a rib.
Great discussion.
That is not the original. I have the facsimile 1611 with gothic writings. That's the original copy
He said it's a re creation of the original. But he's confused himself by how he said it.
Wow! Can i have one too?
@@moseskajina117
You can find plenty of free digital copies online.
I’d love to find a copy of this.
A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favour rather than silver and gold.
I love my Thompson Chain Bible & also my parallel one!
the KJV translators did not believe the Acropyhal was inpsired. they jsut put it there for historical uses.
For a second I thought it was in the testaments. Good try though 👍 the words given by inspiration are found “in” the testaments
Is this inspired? 2 Corinthians 11:8
“I robbed other churches, taking wages of them, to do you service.”
@@martinkono2001 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
I knew those were in the original KJV. Those books were taken out in about 1880.
Those books was catholic that is why it wasn't in the king james Bible
@@davidinchcliff4560
1880s. 1880s. They were in the 1611 KJV.
@@americanswan do you have a 1611 from 1611 or a reprint? Did you get it
@@davidinchcliff4560The books are scriptural, they were always in the Bible.
@christsavesreadromans1096 in the catholic Bible. Not in the king james 1611
Question: You do realize in 1611 British citizens still spoke Engelische and not English therefore this book would have been used by government officials.
Church was government at that timeline.
Holy in English is Health and Bible in English is Books and this is a Religious Bible "Law Books".👍
Put just as much effort into Democracy as you do with Christianity because that system collapsed a very long time ago and is no longer the ruling party.
It was put BETWEEN the two testaments, but NOT listed as part of either.
If you inherit a used '97 Cherokee but someone left their empty soda cans and food wrappers in it, when you clean all the garbage out you don't have a used 97' Cherokee anymore.
What I want to know is if the king James isn’t the perfect word of God then where is it? Are they saying it isn’t in the English? I know nobody is dumb enough to say it’s the NIV 😂
Really just called parts of the Bible trash.
Why should we trust a church created by a murderous divorcer to say whose parts do the already 1000s year old Bible that was established by the early church.
@@Kevin-io4qmthe Vulgate, or I believe there is own down right before it that was 100% Greek.
@@Kevin-io4qm, yes. Translations of the Bible from the original languages (Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic) aren’t inspired. Only the original texts are.
The Ethiopian bible has the Apocrypha, Enoch and Jubilees.
Says who ?
Christians don't care about the actual history of there religion they just care about Jesus, sad but true.
@@basedbane787Probably Ethiopians
@@CybermanKing because they're so trustworthy. A nation of people who can't read talking about books
@@basedbane787 Yeah, their literacy rate is kinda low at 49% but the Ethiopian Bible was created at a time when global literacy rate was just over 5%. That’s such a bizarre reason to be skeptical that they have the Apocryphal et al. It’s not hidden knowledge either you can look it for yourself.
Making a quick response.. to all my KJV brothers and sisters. The Apocrypha was removed because it's from the Catholic type religion which is not from God, not biblical, a bunch of side note that were added by man. Not God. The KJV Bible is the closest we get to true Scripture written and carried by the Holy Ghost. Apocrypha was not part of God's word so King James had it removed.
Yep not inspired
What's even crazier is that nearly ALL bibles had the "Apocrypha" in them prior to the 1611 KJV, and were considered Deuterocanonical. They were mixed in with the other books, and not separated and labeled "Apocrypha." I wonder does Sola Scriptura still apply, considering that our earliest Bibles had these books in them?
Can confirm the vulgate has the apocrypha. Why is this an issue for people?
@@Otome_chan311 Protestant... That is the issue, they have disconnected themselves from the roots and some of their denomination are doing really weird stuff for since there is almost no limits.
Some have gay/women priests etc etc (not saying that gays cannot worship or believe in God but isn't allowed as leads)
@@KRFrostFire1Remind me again how much blood the Catholic church is responsible for letting? Also don't forget about all those altar boys.
@@Rjwyer So do we follow the faults of man or do we follow the doctrines of God and the Holy Spirit?
If you're a bad person and Christian, do I judge the Christian doctrines or do I judge you as a person?
@@KRFrostFire1 I follow Jesus
The older Christianity becomes, the more the faith splinters into different faiths, each new one stripping away more & more Abrahamic texts from the Canon. The fewer texts each faith has, the more fanatical their hatred grows of other Christians
About 2016, the Lord spent months teaching me Aramaic was the original NT. Eventually I found a Aramaic translation into English. In Colossians it equivocates being sick to being a fornicator. Another book, it says "nothing is difficult for God". And, I didn't ask to be a prophet.
The Restoration of the Fulness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ
A Bicentennial Proclamation to the World
The First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints This proclamation was read by the Prophet, Seer, Revelator and Church President Russell M. Nelson as part of his message at the 190th Annual General Conference, April 5, 2020, in Salt Lake City, Utah.
We solemnly proclaim that God loves His children in every nation of the world. God the Father has given us the divine birth, the incomparable life, and the infinite atoning sacrifice of His Beloved Son, Jesus Christ. By the power of the Father, Jesus rose again and gained the victory over death. He is our Savior, our Exemplar, and our Redeemer. Two hundred years ago, on a beautiful spring morning in 1820, young Joseph Smith, seeking to know which church to join, went into the woods to pray near his home in upstate New York, USA. He had questions regarding the salvation of his soul and trusted that God would direct him. In humility, we declare that in answer to his prayer, God the Father and His Son, Jesus Christ, appeared to Joseph and inaugurated the “restitution of all things” (Acts 3:21) as foretold in the Bible. In this vision, he learned that following the death of the original Apostles, Christ’s New Testament Church was lost from the earth. Joseph would be instrumental in its return. We affirm that under the direction of the Father and the Son, heavenly messengers came to instruct Joseph and re-establish the Church of Jesus Christ. The resurrected John the Baptist restored the authority to baptize by immersion for the remission of sins. Three of the original twelve Apostles-Peter, James, and John-restored the apostleship and keys of priesthood authority. Others came as well, including Elijah, who restored the authority to join families together forever in eternal relationships that transcend death. We further witness that Joseph Smith was given the gift and power of God to translate an ancient record: the Book of Mormon-Another Testament of Jesus Christ. Pages of this sacred text include an account of the personal ministry of Jesus Christ among people in the Western Hemisphere soon after His Resurrection. It teaches of life’s purpose and explains the doctrine of Christ, which is central to that purpose. As a companion scripture to the Bible, the Book of Mormon testifies that all human beings are sons and daughters of a loving Father in Heaven, that He has a divine plan for our lives, and that His Son, Jesus Christ, speaks today as well as in days of old. We declare that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, organized on April 6, 1830, is Christ’s New Testament Church restored. This Church is anchored in the perfect life of its chief cornerstone, Jesus Christ, and in His infinite Atonement and literal Resurrection. Jesus Christ has once again called Apostles and has given them priesthood authority. He invites all of us to come unto Him and His Church, to receive the Holy Ghost, the ordinances of salvation, and to gain enduring joy. Two hundred years have now elapsed since this Restoration was initiated by God the Father and His Beloved Son, Jesus Christ. Millions throughout the world have embraced a knowledge of these prophesied events. We gladly declare that the promised Restoration goes forward through continuing revelation. The earth will never again be the same, as God will “gather together in one all things in Christ” (Ephesians 1:10). With reverence and gratitude, we as His Apostles invite all to know-as we do-that the heavens are open. We affirm that God is making known His will for His beloved sons and daughters. We testify that those who prayerfully study the message of the Restoration and act in faith will be blessed to gain their own witness of its divinity and of its purpose to prepare the world for the promised Second Coming of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
The creators and Inspiration of the KJV did not believe that the apocrypha was inspired but due to political reasons had to put it in thus its take out today in KJV bibles.
Is this inspired? 2 Corinthians 11:8
“I robbed other churches, taking wages of them, to do you service.”
@@martinkono2001 2 Tim 3:16 KJV
@@martinkono2001 The first verse of that chapter holds a rather important bit of context.
Paul did do nasty things. that's facts.
I have the 1611 , rewritten Bible with the King James disclaimer sort of statement in the front that says the due diligence that was taken to assure that every word was translated for what it was! I always check the Bibles that are given to me or that I buy to make sure they are accurate and as close as possible king James Verison is correct the new and the international change words change meanings! I use the King James Version. Yes my 1611 King James Verison has the apocrypha in it too.
For all these people that are saying that Apocrypha is not considered canon you need to do more research many people back in Jesus time, including Paul did consider those books to be canon. For example, the book of Enoch is mentioned in Jude, the book of Julibee was also mentioned. there is also other books that are mentioned, but they did not put it in. There are many many people in Jesus time, including Paul that did believe Enoch and others were canon, and they treated it as common knowledge even Flavius Josephus said that these books were Canon and were around at that time and after so for those people that’s trying to sound, smart and be experts saying oh this is proof that it’s not divine scripture. You need to stop it just because the apocrypha sounds all crazy doesn’t mean it’s not true. The reason why people are saying it’s not Canon is because it “sounds” ridiculous like the fallen angels mingling with humans and so on how was that ridiculous when Genesis 6 confirms it and there are other books that confirmed the Giants were a result of fallen angels and humans having relations
I have the 1611 King James. ❤
ALL of the English Bibles from 1382 Wycliffe , 1535 Coverdale, 1537 Mathew, 1539 Great Bible, 1560 Geneva Bible , 1568 Bishops and the 1611 KJB had the Apocrypha in it. The apocrypha was not part of the Hebrew Bible and first appeared in the Greek Septuagint. It has NEVER been consider canon , only a source of Jewish history. Study the 1618 Synode of Dort to discover the 4 tests applied to determine canon. The whole Apocrypha fails miserably at all 4 tests.
The kjv WAS an accurate translation UNTIL the english language it was translated into CHANGED . It has no become nessesary ether to translate the kjv English into modern English, or to simply use a modern translation. Its not just a style either. Some words have changed such that thier meanings are even oposite what they meant when kjv was new.
The apocrypha had its own section and it was removed because it wasnt deemed appropriate to have non cannonical scriptures between the new and old testament
Read the preface for the apocryphal books.
Hello Savage truth I will try to do that but keep in mind my 1611 King James Bible has brown crumbly pages so I do not want to keep touching it
He wasn't asking you!
@@j.j.8741 gee thanks for clearing that up for me.
@@savagetruth8009JJ 8741 wasn't replying to you, JJ was replying to Laura long replying to you! Lol
I have the 1611 and I have the apocrypha in it and even in the beginning it says we eject the apocrypha it’s full of errors and mistakes. That’s why it has its separate section. Back then it was Catholic law. Once Catholics had no rule they took it out. Through faith in His blood is what kind James said it takes to be saved.
AMEN and correct. the Blood stained gospel. the Translators knew the right gospel too.
No the Catholics still use the complete Bible as handed down to us by the early Church.
We certainly did not allow a printer to decide to remove the books in a board meeting.
@@PatrickSteil no sir. That’s why the men of the kjv 1611 wrote in their preface that it is a perversion and has errors and shouldn’t be considered canon.
@@JosephyJay-LisseMinistries So why in the world would they include the perverted book with errors in their printing of the Bible and for another 150+ years?
Is there somewhere that you know online where I can read that preface that makes this claim as you stated, I cannot find it.
Do you dispute that it was the Royal Bible society that decided to start printing Bibles without the Deuterocanonical books - without any type of "church council" to decide this?
All yall read 2nd Timothy 3:16 who dispute the Apocrypha, and have been brainwashed that we live out of the new testament, " NOW WHAT'S YOUR EXCUSE!!!!!!!
The aprocrapha is a Coooool read but just remember not to get to caught up in it. Jesus said “preach that the kingdom of heaven is at hand to the lost sheep of Israel” it’s at hand so focus on what you also must to do to enter the kingdom which is to be Christ like. Overcoming temptation after temptation, being a solider in Christ.
The apocrypha was literally just removed to make it cheaper to print. They technically aren’t scriptural, so they don’t HAVE to be there.
they are scripture and have always been scripture
They are canon. Protestants don't have the authority to decide what is Scripture. Only the Catholic Church was given that authority.
And who gave the Catholic Chirch authority?
@@JustinCase807 God
@@ReapingTheHarvest where is it written that he gave them authority?
You can get the re-issued KJV with the Apocrypha in it, or get just the apocrypha by itself in the KJV. But they’re never put in as OT or NT in either the 1611KJV or the newer print. There’s nothing wrong with those books. They’re just not inspired. I like the Maccabees very informative on Jewish vs Roman struggle.
Thank you for mentioning the Maccabees Book. 🕊️🌿 My name means Makabi, Maccabees in Hebrew. That also has ties to The Jewish 🕎 Menorah
Wisdom 2:12-20 is certainly inspired.
Actually there are things wrong with at least some of them. Tobit has howling inconsistencies in its dates; Judith confuses Babylon and Assyria. Wisdom of Solomon was considered a forgery even by Jerome. 2 Esdras is actually a Christian work, from the early 2nd century.
@@fnjesusfreak I just mean in general. it's not bad to read them. or use them as a historical documents; They're not inspired scripture is my point.
The kjv writers themselves wrote that the kjv must be corrected if correction is necessary. They did not claim to write a perfect translation. Nowadays we have much more information and many more findings of older script copies than the writers had in 1611
It was put in there to appease the Catholic, if it was considered true scriptures then it wouldn't have been placed in the middle of the book and it wouldn't have a special name " Apocrypha" they would just be scriptures like all the rest.
even martin Luther said those books were good to read I'm pretty sure,
Pretty sure he didn't.
@@joshportie Pretty sure he did
I love them too. I’ve learned A LOT from the apocrypha. They’re amazing books and I believe hold relevant knowledge too.
I have the original 1611 with the Apocrypha.
Well, Jesus Christ's words are in the KJV, and since His words are true and He is the way to life, John 14:6, then we are counting on Him, not the apocrypha.
1. They included the Apocrypha, although it wasn't canon, because they felt that it was still vaulable.
2. The final refined edition of the KJV is more correct than the raw 1611 version. You can see this by the evidence of the bible codes - see TruthIsChrist's video about the 1611 bible.
All Praises for doing unto others what we want done to us!!!
LOL. THAT statement/quote is from the Catholic Bible- or its catechism.
@@---zc4qt LOL even louder and the LOUDEST... Says one who is perpetuating lies added to the TRUTH of WHAT belonged to Who, and was stolen by who?
Every Protestant Bible had the apocrypha until the 1800s; including Martin Luther’s Bible.
More like 1776 to be exact, but yea.
@@NathanH83
🙄
@@NathanH83 more like 1776? How about 1769 with the Blaney edition.
Not exactly- while the 1885 RV did not include the Apocrypha, it did not omit it. It was included in the second edition of 1895.
The Apocrypha wasnt in the bible, it was put in between old and new.
The apocrypha was place in between the old and New Testament as NON CANON
it was placed for historical reading only as it contradicts the old and New Testament in areas of it .
You can look up pages from the 1611 King James Bible. Try to read some of them, they’re very hard to read. You’ll understand what I mean when you try to read them. You will probably be able to read some of it but it won’t be easy. I have the same Bible but a 1769 version that is much easier to understand, it still has thee and thou and other things but at least I can read and understand it. It’s a very big first edition, 500th anniversary of the reformation 1517-2017.
protestants finding out that the original bible has more books moment
The reason the apocrypha was in the 1611 KJV was because King James had them inserted in the bible because at the time they was thought of as uninspired books however historically accurate, in 1880 they were found to be historically inaccurate, thus they was removed
It even has fantasy letters in each portion. The big artsy style letter always common in a fairytale fable especially first editions.
The original has a Calendar as well. It’s in old English before they changed the I’s to J’s. Many spellings are different but one can get used to it
You said it - The CATHOLIC CHURCH : No other religion has spilt more persecution blood than the Pope - God in His wisdom has preordained the current KJV to be the most accurate & the numbers don't lie - precise bible numerics have proved it - the other books were not inspired by The Holy Spirit but clever delusions designed to stumble - The Books of 'Enoch' , 'Apochcrypha' , 'Jasher' were excluded for the sake of those who are called to inherit eternal life 👆
AMEN! It's sad that Christians forget the atrocities committed by the Catholic Church during the Dark Ages. They forget that the Roman Catholic Church is responsible for changing the TRUE SABBATH!
But we have a King of Kings that will return to serve justice for what they have done...
Jesus, Paul, Peter, and Jude quoted and alluded to the book of Enoch.
i am very curious about the sixteen eleven bible i have one praying and seeking the truth new to all this understanding but i love God's word just joined
Be curious. Compare the kjv with any other so called bible and u will see it's superiority. New bibles remove verses and words like study, Calvary, godhead, Lucifer, and some like the niv even give Lucifer Jesus' title of morningstar in Isaiah 14 just to name a few of the hundreds of horrible and dishonorable changes they make to make it "easier to understand." They are satanic counterfeits. Every last one of them
The point is: "KJ only" bible readers believe that the KJ bible was a god inspired collection and arrangement of 66 books. When in fact, the so called "god inspired collection" also includes books beyond the 66 in the current load out. Which completely undermines their arguments and numerology.
It's clearly marked as Apocrypha too, because they always knew it was a study aid, and its authorship by God was _always_ contended.
In those days, the word "nice" for example, meant witchcraft, wickedness. That is now an obsolete use of the word "nice". So I'm seeking out this version, but I'm wondering if the obsolete meanings of some words may affect interpretation. Can you comment on this, possibly give me some feedback?
Become VERY familiar with your KJV. If you know your Bible, you’ll know what the 1611 is supposed to mean😌
yes the devil loves nice....the Father and CHRIST where not nice especially to evil.
Thank you for this information, I'll now be abstaining from the usage of the word 'nice'. Thank you
Get yourself an 1828 Noah Webster dictionary and a book titled "archaic words of the king James Bible". I've never heard of that definition of nice I'd double check on that but there are some words like conversation, let, and prevent that have much richer definitions. The language in general is a more exact language and was archaic even when the kjv was made. It's was chosen for use because it could better translate from the original languages. The kjv is perfect, don't settle for a counterfeit bible made for profit.
@@solomon7722If you refrain from saying words because their meaning used to be another meaning, you wouldn't talk at all. C'mon! Communication involves using words as people currently understand them! That's one reason why I don't speak Greek or Hebrew to an English speaking person. Your words mean nothing if nobody understands what you are saying!
Study more and don't get too excited.
The KJV is the PURE, PRECISE, and PERFECT words of God. All modern bibles are imperfect, deceitful, and fake bibles.
So does that mean my NKJV is fake!?👀
@@tashiavanpeltno, but if you buy the new King James Version you'll notice there is scriptures missing out of them there's a gentleman that compared the the newly printed to the ones that were printed before.
Actually, modern KJV are Scofield Bibles. They were added to in the 1830s by a charlatan, with the backing of the ZIONIST lawyer that gave us the Federal Reserve. They were then published by Oxford Publishing... The original doesn't have the Zionist agenda peppered into its pages.
What's your take on the 1599 Geneva Bible?
yup@@tashiavanpelt
The Septuagint is the version used by early Christians. The Deuterocanonical Apocrypha was used in the early church.
If you notice it is in the middle between the old and the New Testament. It was used for historical perspective, and was no canonical. No where in the Apocrypha does it say “the Lord said”, or “thus says the Lord”. Those are the marks of the inspiration of Holy Spirit.
The apocrypha is a good history book. That’s why it’s there. It’s not scripture it’s a history book.
It is scripture according to the early church
@@NathanH83wrong.
@@roberttassone7676
How so? Are you saying that not one single Christian in the early church accepted the Apocryphal books as scripture?
@@NathanH83one single Christian is not the church. The apocrypha was never part of the Hebrew Bible. It was added into the Greek Septuagint. Even St Jerome who translated the Latin Vulgate knew they were not canon. Study the 1618 Synode of Dort and you will discover the 4 tests to determine canon. The whole apocrypha fails miserably at all 4 tests.
@@roberttassone7676
The church councils of Rome, Hippo, and Carthage in the 380’s and 390’s consisted of multiple church fathers across 3 different regions, and these church leaders declared the Apocryphal books to be divine, canonical scripture. The Apocryphal books were in the original Hebrew Bible. The Jews authored them and added them to their own Hebrew Bible before the time of Christ. That’s why they were also included in the Greek Septuagint which the Jews translated before the time of Christ.
Do you have a link to that exact same 1611 Bible? I want to purchase it.
Hello Rocky I do have an original copy of the 1611 King James version I am 70 years old it belonged to my great-great-grandmother but I would never sell it because it is full of family entries starting in the 1800's
You can buy it from Hendrickson.
The book is written in Allegories it was never intended for English translation. For example "the land of milk & Honey"
When you Meditate your pituitary gland creates a Yellow fluid & your pineal gland creates a white fluid hence "The land of Milk & Honey. "Many shall come but few will be chosen" Meditation isn't easy you must practice to achieve the Christos,” meaning “anointed,”
One more
Numbers kjv 2:9 All that were numbered in the camp of Judah were an hundred thousand and fourscore thousand and six thousand and four hundred, throughout their armies. These shall first set forth.
it says that Judah had 186,400 people in its camp. Judah is referred to in the Bible as the people of light.
186,400 is the constant speed of light. Modern man learned the speed of light 350 years ago. As you can the they knew this 7 thousand years ago.
Yes I have the original King James, but what most people don’t know, it that the early Evangelical church had concluded (by their studies) that the Apocrypha was not “Anointed” by the Holy Spirit, because they give no references to any of the other scriptures of the Bible.
But then many “religious” people won’t have that discernment.
And yes I have studied it… but then I have also noticed that all other “versions”, were watered down and rewritten… instead of prayed over and re-read.
God showed me the errors of other versions, of which God commands…
Thou shalt not remove any of the words from this prophecy nor add…
But “other” versions have done both as by rewriting Gods Holy Word.
Ever 1000 years God raised a prophet to prove his word and truth… that time is near at hand!
12th century, there arose Three groups:
The Obligees, AnaBaptist, and one other, history recorded them as “heroics” and were all killed… where it is written… “thou shalt not kill”. “martyr” is the proper word.
Not long after came Martin Luther and the thesis he nailed to the Catholic Church door and ran for his life.
There is a difference between “religion” and actual in-depth study of the Bible…
2 Tim 2:15
Study to shew thy self approved unto God, a workman that needeth not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
When you understand the purpose of the Bible as well as the church in the earth, as well as God will… then you will understand “THE SHAME”.
Very nice. Love my KJV. I don't care for the apocrypha though.
You don't care for the true word of God?
@@truffeltroll6668 the apocrypha was not inspired. It was compiled many years after the apostles passed away.
@@truffeltroll6668 The Apocrypha is not God's word. Please see the comment I left in the comment section.
@@AnthonyTuminello who are you to decide?
The bible was writen by humans, who gave you the right to decide, what God wants us to believe?
Some paedophile pastor in your church?
I speak like a king because I use the king James bible. Repent! I know someone who died and came back to life. There is a kingdom for the righteous Christians. Every righteous Christian should preach the true gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ every week. Going to church every sunday is an abomination. If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha. 1 Corinthians 16:22. The everlasting gospel is to believe on the Lord Jesus, repent of your deeds, and keep the commandments of Jesus if you love him. We must abstain from (fornication, idolatry, blood, strangled things) the FIBS before we can say that we have turned to God. Do you love Judge Jesus the Almighty enough to respect each holy day, each new moon, and each sabbath? Colossians 2:8,16,18. Old King James Bible. Do you love the Lord Jesus enough to stop making yourself abominable, and to stop eating abominations like swine (pig/pork/bacon…), chicken, turkey, catfish, lobster, mouse, shrimp, cicada, etc? Revelation 21:8, Leviticus 11:43, Deuteronomy 14, Revelation 18:2. Now Romans 14 is clearly talking about fast days (not eating to the Lord) and the feast days of men like anniversaries, birthdays, graduations, weddings, promotions, dedications, etc. And Romans 14 also speaks about the people (biblitarian clean beast eaters) who may eat all things God said was clean, and the people who only eat herbs (herbivore vegetarians/vegans). Biblitarians are stronger, healthier and live longer than herbivores. God was the one who esteemed, blessed, sanctified, and hallowed the sabbath day. He also blesses each new moon, and holy feast day. He did NOT bless and does NOT esteem the first day sunday, turkeyday, Christmas, Easter, crossover (January 1st), Ramadan, friday, nor other heathen days. REPENT of your deeds and preach the true gospel to sinners in the streets. Jesus hates the deeds and the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes which is grace and the traditions of men. I pray that the Holy Ghost will open your eyes to the truth. Have a good residue of the year. Love others as Jesus loves you.
I was unfortunate enough to finally meet someone who maintained that the KJV was wrong to spell Jesus with a J because Hebrew did not have any J's. It's a good thing I didn't mention that the KJV did not in fact use a J when spelling Jesus' name (but rather an I) because I can imagine how long that argument would have gone on for.
Was he someone who says that the 1611 edition of the KJV is the only real and true KJV? If so, that's actually not that hard to explain to someone like him. The letter _J_ wasn't officially adopted into the English language until around 1634, so until then, the letter _I_ was used in place of the letter _J._
But the thing is, the letter _I_ _(where it was used in place of the letter _J),_ made the "J" sound, not the "Y" sound. So the name "Iesvs" was still pronounced as "Jesus".
Go look up the video _"From Yeshua to Jesus: How We Got the Spelling and Pronunciation of the Name Jesus in English"_ here on UA-cam. It's a very good video explaining the history behind it all.
@@AnthonyTuminello No, but he did use the Complete Jewish Study Bible in combo with the KJV.
@@derrickpurdy7011 Sounds likes he's one of those Hebrew roots guys trying to put himself back under the curse of the law.
Jesus is the correct way in English
@@AnthonyTuminello so God's Law is a curse? Sounds satanic
my kjv bible has maps that weren’t in the 1611. However i understand as the translators understood that reference materials can be helpful additions that no one will confuse with scripture. the etymology of the word apocrypha indicates it was for private reading and not scripture. The other differences they eliminated the horrible gothic font and standardized spelling and punctuation. modern kjv bibles roughly correspond to the blayney 1769 edition which was last major revision. There are thoughtful arguments to be made against the kjv this is not one of them.
My suggestion is get the original Ethiopian bible of 81 books 📚.
"You can read the apocrypha for history, just don't read it for theology."
1. The “Apocrypha” is actually a Protestant collection of books. It mostly correlates with the Roman Catholic Deuterocanon, but not exactly. The Protestant Apocrypha actually has MORE books in it than the Deuterocanon- yes, Protestant Bibles with the Apocrypha have books that aren’t even in Catholic Bibles.
2. The Protestant Apocrypha originated when Protestants removed the Deuterocanonical sections of the Roman Catholic Old Testament, and moved them to the middle of the Bible. In addition, Protestant included other ancient Jewish books they had which weren’t even part of the Catholic Deuterocanon. (The deuterocanon means “secondary canon” and is used by Catholics to denote those books which are in the Greek version of the OT - the Septuagint - but not in the Hebrew version).
3. All Protestant Bibles up until the 1800s had the Apocrypha. It was only then that some folks started to think they shouldn’t be printed with the canonical books and plus, it saved money not to print them.
4. Just because the Apocryphal books were printed with Bibles doesn’t mean Protestant back then accepted them as canonical. They didn’t. However, Protestants continued to read them just like we might read CS Lewis or some other Christian books. The Reformers and even the Puritans quote from them, but they didn’t consider them Holy Scripture.
What? the Orthodox Church hasn't changed it's books and still has all the books! The Orthodox Study Bible!!!
@@rigavitch Which “Orthodox” canon? The Greeks have one canon. The Armenians have another. The Ethiopians have another. etc etc…
The Orthodox Study Bible@@harpsichordkid
Eastern and Oriental Orthodox have the same. Sincere question? They are easy to find! @@harpsichordkid
I have to laugh at many of these arguments.
"We should read Bibles that contain the Apocrypha but we should not apply any divine importance to them."
WHAT!!???
😂We alteady knew it was in the 1611. It was also given a seperate section and was deemed to be non-inspired....which is why it wasnt included in following additions.
Jerome was COMMANDED to include the 7 additional books to his list, but he specifically added them as scripture APART from the other books, and he wrote about this. It was not until the council of Florence that they were declared part of the Canon with the other books, and reaffirmed at Trent.
There is nothing wrong with reading these books, but everything in them must be filtered through the other scriptures.
Where did St. Jerome write about this event?