Channel Islands Twin Pin Surfboard Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @colemandupont7502
    @colemandupont7502 2 роки тому +8

    I recommend getting the board a few inches shorter than your normal short board, long rail outline, I’m 6’0 riding a 5’9, I get the same step up feel as it’s around 30L. This board DOES NOT work in anything under 4 foot to be honest. Honestly, wouldn’t ride it in any conditioned he rode it in, rails catch in fat surf.

  • @StephenBeale
    @StephenBeale 2 роки тому +6

    That glass job is worrying. Not a good sign for longevity. Thanks for the honesty 👍

  • @J_Smith7
    @J_Smith7 2 роки тому +1

    thank you for the detailed review.

  • @zacklee6169
    @zacklee6169 3 роки тому +2

    Love it! I'm considering to get 5'11 or 6'1" at this moment. yew!

    • @SkipperSurfReview
      @SkipperSurfReview  3 роки тому

      Thanks for watching. Yew, go fo it! I don't regret though. We're getting a solid tropical swell this weekend. Can't wait to put it in work!!

  • @MarkFeng
    @MarkFeng 3 роки тому +7

    Killer review as usual bro! your surfing is looking really smooth! I have a 5'11 twin pin and can attest to the glass job :( very weak compared to all my other PU boards and pretty disappointed. I honest am debating whether I should keep this board. I find myself surfing my 5'7 seaside and 5'10 inferno 72 a lot more, and it's hard to find a place in between for the twin pin. Are you planning to keep it?

    • @SkipperSurfReview
      @SkipperSurfReview  3 роки тому +3

      Thank you, bro! I'm planning on keeping it for sure. I can't wait to try it on some solid 4-6 ft day. The wave range and count would definitely be lower if I was on 5'11" with less volume. Do you surf more mellow break? If so, I can see how it would be harder to get on waves. The Twin Pin needs more steeper waves to get going🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @MarkFeng
      @MarkFeng 3 роки тому +4

      @@SkipperSurfReview I surf small but punchy beach close outs in Santa Monica haha. I find it fine to catch waves, but l find it lacks drive compared to the seaside and doesn’t turn as well as the inferno 72. Kind of a awkward middle ground. We rarely get big waves these days so maybe I should wait till winter and try on actual nice waves before deciding to let it go. There are already pressure dings on it so I won’t get much money for it anyways haha.

    • @SkipperSurfReview
      @SkipperSurfReview  3 роки тому +1

      It’s definitely not sparky as the Seaside but I like how holds through the turns. I’d try it on bigger days. May be the wave is too fat for it. I can see how slow it would go.

  • @Mrcarlosfeyder
    @Mrcarlosfeyder 3 роки тому +4

    great review! still not sure about this board though, looking to complement my seaside and beyond with board that has a bit more of a thruster feel, thought this was a good option but looking at the lost crowd killer round I think, a bit more user friendly and suited to varying waves.

    • @SkipperSurfReview
      @SkipperSurfReview  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you, Carlos! The crowd killer goes more like a mid length and will definitely cover more conditions with less work😁 The Twin Pin just gives you more freedom on a wave with great flow. I gotta see how it performs in 4-6 ft.. i bet its gonna work.. it works for Mikey February😂😂😂

    • @79pejeperro
      @79pejeperro 3 роки тому +3

      If this board is generously sized it will outperform the crowd killer without much effort. 6'1 with 35 litres is already on the fat side of board volume

    • @SkipperSurfReview
      @SkipperSurfReview  3 роки тому

      @@79pejeperro if I was surfing in Indo or even in CA some solid South swells, I wouldn’t go that high in volume for sure.
      However bigger size would give me more chances to get waves in a crowded lineup. It doesn’t feel bulky to struggle with the duck dives.

    • @79pejeperro
      @79pejeperro 3 роки тому

      @@SkipperSurfReview 5'10 84 kg and ordered a 6'1. Will go in good and worse waves. I don't want to carry two boards.

  • @cthp
    @cthp Рік тому +3

    I have a twin pin also and I honestly think 4ft is the smallest u should take it out in

  • @79pejeperro
    @79pejeperro 3 роки тому +3

    I ordered 4+6+4 glassing

  • @zandakaskieva2349
    @zandakaskieva2349 3 роки тому +1

    Great and honest review!

  • @ChadAtkinson
    @ChadAtkinson 3 роки тому +4

    Channel Islands boards are geared more towards serious surfers that value performance over durability
    So, expect depressions from day 1

    • @SkipperSurfReview
      @SkipperSurfReview  3 роки тому +7

      Well, the CI Mid came out in great quality. It seems like the boards are in high performance zone are lack of quality. I didn't get depressed yet but if the waves don't arrive soon, it may happen LOL

    • @charleshawk6668
      @charleshawk6668 24 дні тому

      Nope. The mids have g glassing

  • @adryanyork3581
    @adryanyork3581 3 роки тому +1

    good stuff mate, from Australia

  • @tomasgesu
    @tomasgesu 3 роки тому +1

    Yeeeeew! Sick review dude ✌🏼

  • @adamwaz5615
    @adamwaz5615 2 роки тому +1

    Gee you're able to describe the differences a lot considering your ability. Well done.

  • @michaelono7335
    @michaelono7335 2 роки тому +1

    If you were to buy it again, would you get the same dims? Thinner?

    • @SkipperSurfReview
      @SkipperSurfReview  2 роки тому +1

      So, If I surfed better waves with more power, I would go thinner.. like 5'11". The 6'1" does cover smaller conditions in my backyard but I would rather surf other boards like Mini Simmons or Fish. Hope this helps!

  • @mrmr314
    @mrmr314 2 роки тому +5

    These board makers have to stop using 444 glass. They must be 644 or 664 or they can't charge what they are charging for these throwaway boards. It's a rort and a ripoff.