Chess but I have to spin the wheel each move...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2022
  • 🧔🏽 Play Martin Here www.chess.com/play/computer?r...
    Get my 5 most popular courses in one discounted bundle⏩chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
    Links are affiliate links and help support the Chess Vibes channel via a commission.
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 750

  • @user-kn3gn3if7y
    @user-kn3gn3if7y Рік тому +969

    In fact, Martin spins a similar wheel for his moves. It has 9 "blunder" and 1 "move"

    • @pi_man3
      @pi_man3 Рік тому +62

      Unless it's mate in one.

    • @MrMinecraft5578
      @MrMinecraft5578 Рік тому +10

      It's ". . . Martin spins* a . . ." Mr. Ivan Vasl'yev.

    • @user-kn3gn3if7y
      @user-kn3gn3if7y Рік тому +4

      @@MrMinecraft5578 ok, I redacteds

    • @MrMinecraft5578
      @MrMinecraft5578 Рік тому +4

      @@user-kn3gn3if7yOk but, *reacted. Also did I get the name right?

    • @uunholyy_
      @uunholyy_ Рік тому +5

      ​@@MrMinecraft5578 ngl u sounding like a nerd but alr

  • @Supergoon1989
    @Supergoon1989 Рік тому +2006

    OMG, you should have put a MUCH larger percentage of the pie as 'move' - This went exactly as I expected with these segments.

    • @Anewedition2024
      @Anewedition2024 Рік тому +13

      you have 2 comments on this video

    • @Supergoon1989
      @Supergoon1989 Рік тому +133

      @@Anewedition2024 Actually it's closer to 5. Maybe 6. I sometimes watch a bit, then make a comment, then watch a bit more. Then 1 more final comment at the end when i'm done watching.

    • @harrycop7944
      @harrycop7944 Рік тому +9

      @@Supergoon1989 smart

    • @RubyPiec
      @RubyPiec Рік тому +37

      @@Supergoon1989 i'm always scared of doing that because it makes me look like a spammer and annoying

    • @chaosbuilder1531
      @chaosbuilder1531 Рік тому +6

      @@RubyPiec same

  • @Cyrus79979
    @Cyrus79979 Рік тому +43

    “What’s the best blunder” never thought I would hear that from him 😂

  • @lindabeckley6382
    @lindabeckley6382 Рік тому +340

    I think if you land on an option you can’t do, you should re spin the wheel. Each time you land on something you can’t do (blunder, check or capture), it’s like having 3 extra slices that mean giving Martin a Queen. The odds of you giving Martin a Queen are a lot higher than they appear, making it a lot more difficult to win!

    • @nwoDekaTsyawlA
      @nwoDekaTsyawlA Рік тому +10

      While I agree with the assessment, I think that the second was very interesting because Nelson had to adjust his strategy to be able to perform the actions in order to avoid giving Martin the queen.

    • @KororaPenguin
      @KororaPenguin Рік тому +3

      Or omit the add-a-piece complex altogether. Roll a d12. An even number means move like normal. A 5, 7, or 11 means capture if possible. A 3 or 9 means check if possible. And a 1 means play a move that is, to the best of your knowledge, a blunder. A result you cannot obey means re-roll.

    • @mistytrussell642
      @mistytrussell642 Рік тому

      @@KororaPenguin L

    • @mistytrussell642
      @mistytrussell642 Рік тому

      Oops I didn’t want to type😂

    • @arishnicoff2621
      @arishnicoff2621 Місяць тому

      Rats I just commented the exact same thing

  • @quentind1924
    @quentind1924 Рік тому +637

    Here are my suggestions for next time :
    Replace "give martin a queen" to "give martin a random piece" (and spin another wheel with all 5 pieces with equal pfobability)
    Add some rules to where you can place pieces. I know you do it fairly, but you should add some contidions. Like you can’t place one of your pawns in the 7th rank (even 4th rank is too high) nor place it where it can capture a piece (so 11:00 should have not be legal). And for the opponent’s pieces you add, same thing you can’t place it where you can capture it
    The "move" should have 50% to get rolled i think, and maybe rename it to "no conditions" (so that there is no ambiguity for if a capture/check is legal when you roll this)

    • @MartinHabovstiak
      @MartinHabovstiak Рік тому +15

      Maybe rather make the piece probability inverse of their value.

    • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
      @user-sl6gn1ss8p Рік тому +8

      @@MartinHabovstiak that's probably too weak then

    • @Ishaan419
      @Ishaan419 Рік тому +1

      Maybe queen to rook next time

    • @MartinHabovstiak
      @MartinHabovstiak Рік тому

      @@user-sl6gn1ss8p there's literally infinite number of functions and their parameters, I think it's possible to find sweet spot.

    • @user-sl6gn1ss8p
      @user-sl6gn1ss8p Рік тому

      @@MartinHabovstiak yeah, definitely, I just think being 9 times more likely to give a pawn than a queen is kind of too weak. But yeah, that does depend on the other parameters as well

  • @Supergoon1989
    @Supergoon1989 Рік тому +438

    10:25 How about Knight to G5? It blunders the knight because his knight or Queen can just take it, and you have it undefended.

  • @shanoc5902
    @shanoc5902 Рік тому +118

    One of the tweaks I think you could make, is that after 'Give Martin a Queen', you shouldn't have to roll the spinner again, you just automatically get a 'move' afterwards. This could also apply to giving yourself a pawn but doesn't need to, it's mainly so that the game doesn't get locked down by giving Martin pieces over and over again as I feel that sometimes it got bogged down by that without advancing the game state. Adding some rules to how the free pieces/pawns are allowed to be given out might also be a good idea, as while in this I feel you did it pretty fairly, having a bit more structure might be nice so that you can't say place a pawn on the 7th rank for a free queen on the next move.
    Another thought is that maybe instead of just 'Give Martin a Queen', you have it so that there's a 'Give Martin a Rook', 'Give Martin a Bishop', and 'Give Martin a knight' and you have all 4 of these options have 1/4th the chance of being chosen relative to everything else (non-valid rolls like 'check' when you can't give one just result in a re-roll). You could also potentially replace one of the 'Move' options with something like 'Push', where you have to move a piece/pawn but are not allowed to capture.

    • @toww2246
      @toww2246 Рік тому +1

      I agree then if he spins the wheel and it lands on like give Martin a queen he should just move and give Martin a queen, and same if he can’t give a check or capture he should still be able to move after those options

  • @user-gm8qm8dv4u
    @user-gm8qm8dv4u 8 місяців тому +9

    4:26😂 right when he said the queens don't help he just got another one

  • @bsmoov7
    @bsmoov7 Рік тому +83

    Only 3/8 choices actually let you move. Also you could be more aggressive with pawn placement when you get a free one. Use the pawn to fork his pieces. Or put one on the 7th rank

  • @calculuslover2078
    @calculuslover2078 Рік тому +28

    It's such joy when he gets a pawn, even if it's a mere pawn, and Martin has the ability to get a whole queen.

  • @Dubanx
    @Dubanx 10 місяців тому +2

    I could have told you from the start this would go horribly. Having a 50% chance of something going wrong in a game with dozens of moves is going to mean a stupidly large number of bad things happening.

  • @lillithplays6514
    @lillithplays6514 Рік тому +9

    The truth is Martin's been using this wheel the entire time

  • @ProKameron
    @ProKameron 11 місяців тому +4

    7:05 If you play this clip near a Google Home, it'll think he said "Ok Google"

  • @anamealastname607
    @anamealastname607 Рік тому +4

    Nelson asking whats the best blunder, was the funniest thing I’ve seen in chess

  • @blomman1719
    @blomman1719 Рік тому +22

    I think it'd be interessting with one option being "tag out". That swiches opponant from martin to stockfish and back.

    • @DaTimmeh
      @DaTimmeh Рік тому +11

      @@arandomgamer3088I love the image of Stockfish seeing a mate 5, executing the initial move(s), then gets tagged out and Martin blunders mate in 1 immediately somehow.

    • @ArCgon
      @ArCgon Рік тому +4

      @@DaTimmeh Usually even Martin is able to see mates in 1 (as he did in both games here).

    • @DaTimmeh
      @DaTimmeh Рік тому +4

      @@ArCgon he sees when he has mate in 1, but he ofc still blunders mate in 1 opportunities for the opponent, that’s what I was referring to. Like stockfish seems m5, plays the first 3 moves till m2, then Martin does something stupid and blunders m1 against him.

    • @Mr.StealYourGirl81
      @Mr.StealYourGirl81 Рік тому

      Oh wow I guessed where you were going to place every queen you gave Martin and every pawn you gave yourself 😅 I’m feeling pretty smart

  • @szihamidt6611
    @szihamidt6611 Рік тому +2

    You dont need to blunder piece, you can blunder position. Saving ur pieces against martin is the best solution

  • @azarlgor
    @azarlgor Рік тому +2

    The best parts were when you rolled capture or check, because sometimes it made you blunder sometimes it allowed you a good move and you could set yourself up for better options.
    Maybe the wheel could have options like this:
    1: Move
    2: Move (no capture)
    3: Capture
    4: Check
    5: Push a pawn
    And if you roll something, you can't do you skip your turn or respin

  • @genericusername-qq1du
    @genericusername-qq1du Рік тому +15

    I loved the idea of a regenerating pawn storm versus the queen army! As other commenters have said, this would work beautifully with a slightly larger portion of the wheel being 'move'

  • @grimreaper7854
    @grimreaper7854 Рік тому +8

    Here is my idea. Feel free to modify it as you see fit or discard it entirely Nelson. I welcome any suggestions from anyone in the replies :). Also, if you have a way to send this to Nelson so that he may be more likely to see it, I have no problem with that, but please try to simplify it(or improve it) first if you can and don’t mind. Now onto the LONG idea, bare with me. When you roll an option you can’t do, you can use the eval bar to determine who gets what. [0.0 or Nelson’s advantage: (martin gets a queen). An advantage of 2-5 for Martin: (Martin gets a rook). An advantage of 6-9 for Martin: (Martin gets a knight). An advantage of 10-12 for Martin: (Martin gets a bishop). An advantage of 13-19 for Martin: (Martin gets 2 pawns). An advantage of 20-25 for Martin: (Martin gets 1 pawn). An advantage of >25 for Martin: (the system reverses in favour of Nelson per 5 advantage added on). Eg. 30 for Martin: (Nelson gets 1 pawn), 35: Nelson gets 2 pawns, 40: Nelson gets a knight or bishop (his choice), 45: Nelson gets the piece he didn’t choose from bishop or knight, etc. For M2 in favour of Martin: Nelson can move one of his pawns to any square (can only be done once every 5 moves, so if in cooldown, Nelson has to move one of his pawns one square backwards except any pawns in adjacent files to the moved pawn.) For any forced mate that nelson has < 7, Nelson must must move one of his pawns(including en Passant) first then for 2 rolls, Nelson can make any legal move.] Finally, if Nelson cannot do his eval-based move, Nelson must roll again. EASTER EGG: if Martin uses en Passant, Nelson gets a queen or to re-roll the roll after the en Passant (his choice).

  • @codypierce5196
    @codypierce5196 Рік тому +2

    My kids love it when you challenge Martin. They are always asking if there is another Martin video.

  • @nintendonerdsvideos4727
    @nintendonerdsvideos4727 Рік тому +8

    I'd like to see a match with 2 grand masters playing both with the wheels

    • @KororaPenguin
      @KororaPenguin Рік тому +2

      THAT would be very interesting indeed!

    • @oZqdiac
      @oZqdiac 7 місяців тому

      Magnum Carlos vs hikaru

  • @ethancampbell245
    @ethancampbell245 Рік тому +5

    I think that the second set of settings is actually really good and that the best way to go forward is to develop some better strategies to help give you “bad” options without losing your advantages
    Practicing for a few games off camera while allowing extra time to analyze may help to get an idea for which moves to make that are very different from normal strong moves

  • @robertmasek9978
    @robertmasek9978 Рік тому +4

    I think placing the queens differently could help a lot, like placing them where you can capture them

  • @alexandrucirtu6506
    @alexandrucirtu6506 Рік тому +2

    nothing I love more than seeing your martin saga!

  • @franklinturtle9849
    @franklinturtle9849 Рік тому +4

    Try this ratio:
    20% Any Move You want
    20% Martin Queen
    20% Pawn or minor piece for you
    20% Blunder
    20% Skip your turn

  • @prim16
    @prim16 Рік тому +5

    I love this idea! But it's best to incorporate more normal moves in there. How about something like...
    -Move or Capture (2)
    -Move Only (2)
    -Capture Only (2)
    -Blunder (2)
    -Give Martin A Queen (1)
    -Give Nelson A Pawn (1)
    70% of the moves are beneficial for you, but it's also challenging because 20% of them have a forced capture, which means you have to strategize to make sure one is available. Since Martin only gets a queen 10% of the time, you won't run away into this runaway queen nightmare

    • @newmeta2668
      @newmeta2668 Рік тому

      Might make it a bit too easy but definitely better than the current wheel

  • @schan2975
    @schan2975 Рік тому +1

    8:07 "Ahh! Nelson gets a pawn!😏"
    LMAO

  • @Supergoon1989
    @Supergoon1989 Рік тому +38

    Change it so that 'Move' has to actually be a move, not a capture. But it takes up more space of the pie than it already does. Capture should change to 'capture or give Martin a Queen' and is also slightly larger in pie-area. Maybe do a couple of very thin pie segments for 'give martin a bishop', 'give martin a knight', etc. ....And Maybe one very small segment for 'Nelson gets a knight'. Maybe it'l come up at crucial moments and save you ;)

    • @Supergoon1989
      @Supergoon1989 Рік тому +3

      Added to this, maybe have some segments that are 'Move or Capture' so if you roll that, then you do get to choose and do exactly what you want. - This was how you were playing 'move' in this version.

  • @dancingwithyourghost9087
    @dancingwithyourghost9087 Рік тому +3

    You should be able to move every turn, and the spin is just a modifier. If you land on "move" on the spinner, then you just don't have a negative modifier

  • @tobylovesart6115
    @tobylovesart6115 9 місяців тому

    “I have to blunder my queen when he could blunder his knight

  • @BorisGamingChannel
    @BorisGamingChannel Рік тому

    This video was very fun! I would love if you rematched Martin, maybe giving yourself some extra chances like not giving him a queen if lands on capture or check and you can't, maybe a rook would work.

  • @CgVibin
    @CgVibin Рік тому +16

    At 10:35 you could have blundered knight on G5

    • @okok72277
      @okok72277 Рік тому +1

      I was screaming this at my screen 😭😭

    • @PermY988
      @PermY988 Рік тому +1

      @@okok72277 same

  • @sh3lol520
    @sh3lol520 Рік тому +2

    this is the best! please do part 2

  • @christopherheckman7957
    @christopherheckman7957 Рік тому

    4:26 "How do you like those five queens, Martin? They don't help you!" * "Give Martin A Queen" comes up on the spinner.
    (Eventually, there won't be any blank squares.)
    8:35 Martin plays the Grob!

  • @yairone9920
    @yairone9920 Рік тому

    even his blunders are brilliant

  • @dawnnightinger3025
    @dawnnightinger3025 8 місяців тому

    You had to give him a queen, but where you put the queen was entirely up to you. So just put the queen in a spot where unless you get a blunder, you can remove the queen from the board. When you get pawns, put them as close to the other side of the board as possible so you can get free queens yourself. It's your move after all. You can even use pawns to take the opposing king.

  • @NiggaWat03
    @NiggaWat03 11 місяців тому +2

    Martin not using his queen's wisely

  • @mattcavallaro8617
    @mattcavallaro8617 11 місяців тому

    "giving him a queen is significant" lmao

  • @tomsgamer985
    @tomsgamer985 Рік тому

    Like your videos ... watch them as a diversion from my main gaming interest in historical conflict simulations (wargames). Your teaching style seems very natural and relatable.
    In wargames, luck is usually a factor because most things in life are not 100% certain. In those games, it's important to be able to make decisions in the face of uncertainty. But in Chess and other similar abstract games, luck shouldn't be part of it, and this thing with Martin and spinning the wheel is just for laughs to mix things up.

  • @WalacaVencano
    @WalacaVencano Рік тому +16

    10:40 You could have blunder your knight on h3 with Ng5.

    • @hugo57k91
      @hugo57k91 Рік тому +1

      Glad someone else noticed it too, he's being too harsh on himself with the blunders. Just cause he has to blunder doesn't mean he has to do the worst one

    • @Godkiller3145
      @Godkiller3145 11 місяців тому

      Yes

  • @jsohi0082
    @jsohi0082 Рік тому +2

    This is such a clever idea. I actually kind of like random chance in strategy games like this. I am wondering if anyone has suggestions for abstract strategy games with some input randomness/luck involved.

  • @etopowertwon
    @etopowertwon Рік тому

    Tweak by using random org (or dice; or wheel) to decide position where new piece lands. For pawns - limit to rank 2,3,4. For queens - 1,2,3,4. Add "give martin a rook/bishop" to distill amount of firepower he gets.
    Add "move a pawn"/"move a bishop"/etc(each piece) so you have more chances to move, but you lack a freedom to choose what to move in doing so

  • @Laezar1
    @Laezar1 Рік тому

    I feel like everything should come with a move like "give martin a queen then move" so you're still making progress. And probably have more moves on the wheel too. Maybe like, one more move aswell as a "move your king" tile. Maybe also a "frenzy" tile where the last piece you moved that isn't the king has to move until it's captured (or maybe a piece of your choice that has the lowest value among your remaining pieces (not pawns cause they can get stuck) so you don't get to just rampage with the queen everytime ). I'm sure there are other possible ideas, but yeah that sounds more fun

  • @Sianistic
    @Sianistic Рік тому

    Idea for another match against Martin
    Chess, but you can never leave a any piece unprotected

  • @koala_connor4060
    @koala_connor4060 Рік тому +1

    10:34 The H3 Knight to G5 was a blunder

  • @fadingintent
    @fadingintent Рік тому +6

    I think you need to move every turn. Change "Give Martin a Queen" to "Move, then give Martin a Queen". If you can't execute an action, "Move, then give Martin a Queen". "Move, then get a Pawn". That will make the game moving and that should give you more control and feel more like chess (but with a wheel).
    I guess you will have a problem that after you Move, Martin will immediately make a move. So maybe if you want to give a Queen: Move, Martin Moves, give him a Queen, then spin again...

    • @meissmart6678
      @meissmart6678 Рік тому

      how about “Give Martin a Queen, then Move”

    • @fadingintent
      @fadingintent Рік тому +1

      @@meissmart6678 Then there is the problem that you always place the queen in a spot where you take it immediately so the queen isn't really there - you would just place it on a spot where you want to reposition your knight, for example. Unless you would make a rule that you can't take the new queen immediately after you place it. Then it would work.

  • @Seeker2834
    @Seeker2834 2 місяці тому

    Martin literally had a harem on his first match against Nelson 😅

  • @LounoirRecords
    @LounoirRecords Рік тому

    do the wheel again, but with each file from a to h where you have to move either from that file or to that file
    against martin ofc

  • @tpd1864blake
    @tpd1864blake Рік тому +1

    You should do a session where you try to speedrun checkmating Martin as fast as possible. See how low you can get your time down to

    • @venexo1434
      @venexo1434 Рік тому +2

      That wouldn’t be very interesting since we already know the fastest way to checkmate. He would just need to be lucky.

  • @anitagofradump5195
    @anitagofradump5195 Рік тому

    Chess against Martin but every 'x' turns one of your pieces/pawns defects to Martin's side

  • @nassir565
    @nassir565 Рік тому

    Nelson not knowing that he can put martin’s queens on an area where they can be captured immediately

  • @concernedcommenter8258
    @concernedcommenter8258 Рік тому

    You spun the wheel, gave him a queen, and SPUN THE WHEEL AGAIN! Just move after!

  • @paristhewabbit
    @paristhewabbit 6 місяців тому

    Nelson vs Martin is the best series on the internet (behind Guess the Elo)

  • @erikstephens6370
    @erikstephens6370 Рік тому +1

    Another challenge idea: Play against Stockfish with the wheel of luck.
    In 4 out of 5 wheel slots, you play a move.
    If you land on the 5th one, you get to remove one of Stockfish's pieces: use another random number generator to decide which piece type you can remove, based on how many of each piece is left. For example: if there are three stockfish pawns and two knights remaining, the number generator should have a 3/5 probability of choosing pawn, and 2/5 of choosing knight. If you land on pawn, you can pick which pawn you want to remove (you'll need as much agency as you can get).

    • @danielbrown001
      @danielbrown001 Рік тому

      I thought of this as well! Have the wheel be mostly good things for the player. Could even have slots for giving yourself a piece. Or a slot for “Martin makes Stockfish’s next move” etc. Would be fun!

  • @JDMLCO
    @JDMLCO Рік тому

    Suggestion: original wheel, but change all instances of “Give Martin a Queen” to “Give Martin one of his captured pieces back”

  • @Shape1425
    @Shape1425 Рік тому

    Here is a suggestion for the next challenge:
    chess but everytime Martin blunder, you blunder.

  • @LindaLooUK
    @LindaLooUK Рік тому +12

    When you have to give or receive a piece you shouldn't be spinning again IMO: it should be Martin's move next. This was fun by the way. 🤩

    • @apolo7178
      @apolo7178 Рік тому +1

      He can’t do that: that is not how that site works

    • @grubbygeorge2117
      @grubbygeorge2117 Рік тому +1

      @@apolo7178you sure? Can’t you decide who moves next when making a custom position?

    • @therandomone9419
      @therandomone9419 Рік тому +1

      @@grubbygeorge2117 either way its a bad idea, nobody moves you just give martin extra material theres no reason to make it his turn

  • @ulfjohnsen6203
    @ulfjohnsen6203 3 місяці тому

    If you want a random roll, set it to be random piece instead. Make sure to leave some part to be your choice.
    However it might be an idea to roll multiple ones, so that you can actually strategize through the randomness.

  • @exist0142
    @exist0142 Рік тому

    Wow this variant is amazing!
    You could maybe add a "skip your turn" to the wheel (and if you are in check, Martin gets a Queen instead).
    Another idea is starting with a one-time use Coin item, which can be used to negate one spin of the wheel and allow you to re-spin.
    Looking forward to more videos like this!

  • @Enderia2
    @Enderia2 Рік тому

    I love how he never notices knight blunders

  • @Dragon.gaming_
    @Dragon.gaming_ Рік тому

    Nelson gets a pawn.
    Puts the pawn in eighth rank.

  • @dylanjax9754
    @dylanjax9754 Рік тому

    "we're gonna take THE queen". It must be the chosen queen.

  • @mr.austin8007
    @mr.austin8007 Рік тому

    I feel like Martin is a student of mittens and he secretly hides his true skill

  • @nerdytom6881
    @nerdytom6881 6 місяців тому

    I think the way to make this work is to use the first wheel and whenever you cannot obey give Martin a pawn.

  • @wjs5875
    @wjs5875 Рік тому

    You should add a slice where any piece you move gets turned into a pawn after you move it

  • @pinakabayani9845
    @pinakabayani9845 Рік тому

    When you give Martin a queen, put it where you can capture it.

  • @xcorrelation
    @xcorrelation Рік тому +2

    Make it so that when you get a pawn / give Martin a queen, you should just be allowed to move whatever you want automatically

  • @hungthanh580
    @hungthanh580 Рік тому

    Make a Martin series, these are so funny to watch

  • @sefun129
    @sefun129 Рік тому

    For the next spin the wheel each move video what I was thinking is that you could play stockfish and there would be 6 sections on the wheel 1. Give stockfish a pawn 2. Take away a pawn from stockfish 3. Nelson gets a pawn 4 take away a pawn from Nelson 5. Move 6 capture

  • @byronwindhorst3220
    @byronwindhorst3220 Рік тому

    Chess but you can't move to or capture or move through the four center squares d4 d5 e4 e5.. The bots can use them normally.. Knights can move around the edge of the mountain for example N from d3 is allowed to move to f4 . .
    ..
    Special rules about Checks and Checkmate = Checks which go through the center squares are not allowed.. You are not allowed to do a check that relies on a piece to defend it through the center even if it's checkmate.. . For example: Black K on c8, ..White B on h2. and White Q on f7. The White Q can't move to c7 because the B on h2 is NOT defending the Q. on c7, because the Bishop can't defend the Q through the center squares, so you can't make that Q move (unless some other piece not working through the mountain can defend). (Why? The Computer would think the Bishop is defending the Q for checkmate.)
    ..
    Play against Nelson. You can call it "She'll be coming round the mountain when she comes." These variations are neat. I'm not great on explaining things so please ask for clarification. Would really like to see how you work without being able to access the center squares or go through them.

  • @Rufus1524
    @Rufus1524 Рік тому

    You should spin the wheel every other turn, that would make it way more interesting.

  • @Yellow434
    @Yellow434 Рік тому

    He could blunder his knights multiple times yet he still blunders his queen

  • @Shadowwand
    @Shadowwand 11 місяців тому

    I think changing it to ban yourself from certain moves is a more interesting idea than giving Martin a queen.
    Any Move.
    Must Capture
    Must Check
    No capture or Check
    Blunder

  • @MsNosis
    @MsNosis Рік тому

    play against Martin, but randomly decide which kind of piece you can move: queen, knight etc. if that kind of piece is no longer available, you must move your king. If in check, you must if ever possible block the check with the piece you are allowed to move, if not possible, you must move your king.

  • @Imaperson1020
    @Imaperson1020 Рік тому

    he can never see when he can blunder his knight, happened like twice

  • @konoveldorada5990
    @konoveldorada5990 Рік тому +1

    I recommend these type of videos.

  • @semideus5008
    @semideus5008 Рік тому

    I didn't even know you could castle from the other side.. I gotta start watching/playing more chess

  • @chessarchitect812
    @chessarchitect812 Рік тому

    if played correctly I feel like giving nelson a pawn should be enough to counter giving martin queens.

  • @rishirajbaul3727
    @rishirajbaul3727 8 місяців тому

    There were opportunities to be cheeky with Queen placements. For instance, at 12:29, Q@h3 was an idea.

  • @iloveallah5960
    @iloveallah5960 Рік тому +1

    1:31 d5 is a blunder of a pawn since the e pawn is pinned after exd5
    10:33 c4 is a blunder as well

    • @faststar1239
      @faststar1239 Рік тому

      I think a blunder is considered a terrible mistake. Hanging a pawn is bad, but the position is still winable or drawable so it isn't a blunder.

  • @joepiazza3756
    @joepiazza3756 Рік тому

    He blundered his queen when he could have blundered his knight.

  • @Yuhirodo
    @Yuhirodo Рік тому

    bro could just spawn his pawn at the end of the board and get a free any piece

  • @its210pm2
    @its210pm2 Місяць тому +1

    1% chance to give Nelson a gun

  • @rosskgilmour
    @rosskgilmour Рік тому

    I feel like you discovered Martin’s original programming

  • @UniTheNstall
    @UniTheNstall Рік тому

    Quite simple way to make it easier. When check or capture cannot be fulfilled, you have to give martin a rook, two knights or two bishops, whatever you like more, instead of a queen.

  • @incrediblebat
    @incrediblebat Рік тому

    martin never misses mate in 1!

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 Рік тому

    "it defaults to give Martin a queen"
    Well, considering that a piece is as strong as the hand that holds it, this shouldn't be too dangerous.

  • @thomasderksen8784
    @thomasderksen8784 Рік тому

    Instead of giving Nelson a Pawn.....make Martin lose the lowest value piece

  • @joshthoughts6177
    @joshthoughts6177 Рік тому

    i think you should do it again but default to move normally instead of defaulting to giving a queen

  • @waltercampbell9787
    @waltercampbell9787 Рік тому

    When you give him a queen, you should be able to do any move after

  • @caseydeis9715
    @caseydeis9715 Рік тому

    When he added Nelson gets a pawn, just put it at the then side of the board, and promote😮

  • @Hi-rw8vr
    @Hi-rw8vr Рік тому

    When you said “give nelson a pawn” I thought you meant the bot nelson for a second 😭

  • @aaronscott7467
    @aaronscott7467 Рік тому

    Make it so that whenever a piece is added, you get to make a move as normal instead of just skipping your turn then.

  • @dentonyoung4314
    @dentonyoung4314 Рік тому

    Change it to "Give Martin a Knight" and make it "Nelson gets a Bishop".

  • @shiva-ji-777
    @shiva-ji-777 9 місяців тому +1

    Bro got a knight to blunder but blundered ...one and only......
    'The Queen' !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..
    !!...!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!

  • @egg4956
    @egg4956 10 місяців тому

    "Just put the queen where it can get captured and put ur pawn on martins back rank"

  • @cattanitruong4181
    @cattanitruong4181 10 місяців тому

    Bro could of blundered his knight instead of his queen lol

  • @argyem6688
    @argyem6688 Рік тому

    Having read some of the other comments, I endorse the following ideas:
    1. 'Move' (at least half of them) should be 'Move (no capture)'.
    2. If you are in check, don't spin. You automatically get a 'move (capture allowed)'.
    3. Instead of 'Give Martin/Nelson a Queen/Pawn' a secondary spinner for 'Somebody gets material' with equal segments for 'Martin gets a Q/R/B/K/P' and one segment for 'Nelson gets a pawn'. That would give you back the Nelson gets a pawn slice, and would allow two each of Move (no capture) and Move (capture allowed). You would spin this if you have no legal moves too.
    4. There should be placement rules, e.g.
    MQ: Goes on the queen's starting square. If she can't go there, she goes anywhere next to the king (they just got married). If she can't go there, she goes anywhere on the rearmost available rank.
    MR/B/K: Goes on the starting square for the piece, or if it can't go there, anywhere on the rearmost available rank. If Martin gets a bishop when he only has one, the new one must go on the opposite colour.
    Pawn (either side): Must go on rank 3/6 if possible, else rank 4/5 or rank 2/7.
    5. Don't re-spin after you add material - the adding of material buys you a 'Move (no capture)', or a 'Move (capture allowed)' if generated by 'Move (no capture)' with no legal moves.

  • @lillithplays6514
    @lillithplays6514 Рік тому

    You should make a wheel that decides what piece you move

  • @toyis123n
    @toyis123n Рік тому

    Its funny that since hes a titled player spotting blunders is hard for him😂