Yes, Established Titles Is A Scam*

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 чер 2024
  • ⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
    It's worse than you thought. 🎗legaleagle.link/givewell Get your $100 donation matched with Givewell (a LEGITIMATE charity)! legaleagle.link/givewell
    Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
    🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
    👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
    GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
    MY COURSES
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
    Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
    SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
    Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
    Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
    Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
    Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
    Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
    OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
    Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
    BUSINESS INQUIRIES
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Please email my agent & manager at legaleagle@standard.tv
    LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
    Special thanks:
    Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
    Music provided by Epidemic Sound
    Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)
    Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21 тис.

  • @LegalEagle
    @LegalEagle  Рік тому +5632

    ⚖ Ugh, the *UK* legal system, not the *English* legal system! I know that, d'oh!
    🎗 Get your GiveWell donation matched up to $100! legaleagle.link/givewell

    • @tfordham13
      @tfordham13 Рік тому +44

      Didn't you do a video with them before?

    • @danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307
      @danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307 Рік тому +6

      They claim you own the land in the adverts THIS IS FRAUD!
      also in the non UK adverts they say "YOU LEGALLY BECOME A LORD"
      You can call yourself anything you want! Its not illegal!
      Signed Danial Quayles The HIGH KING, EMPEROR, PHARAOH, KUBLAI, SHAH, KOHMEINI, KING OF THE ANDALS, THE RYOYNAR AND THE FIRST MEN, Immortal ruler OF SCOTLAND, THE WORLD , THIS UNIVERSE AND ALL OF THE MULTIVERSE and owner of the "peasant lords of scotland" FOR ETERNITY!

    • @cresscelesta
      @cresscelesta Рік тому +85

      That's a nice 10 million dollar studio you have there.

    • @tobiwonkanogy2975
      @tobiwonkanogy2975 Рік тому +38

      I'm of the mind the land is held in trust , much as you described, only under loose contract to record your name , honorarily title you laird or lady and not develop the land . Selling legal name changing is just wording that needs to be changed , a mistake that can be remedied without nuking the whole operation that is presumably to actually protect Scottish lands as forests .

    • @ziggystardog
      @ziggystardog Рік тому +13

      No.

  • @skd
    @skd 10 місяців тому +1461

    They contacted me 4 times (I just double checked) about a sponsorship. And I asked if I can tell my subscribers that this is just for fun, not a real title and they said NO. So yeah, they are a scam.

    • @Naokarma
      @Naokarma 8 місяців тому +171

      Honestly, THIS is what distinguishes them from a scam and just a "gag gift" type of company. If they wanna be taken seriously, then that's what they'll get.

    • @justaguywithapowerpole
      @justaguywithapowerpole 8 місяців тому +10

      why woudl they tell u its not real lol thats a lie ujust told they are a scam but wh ywoudl they tell u they are

    • @grahamreece519
      @grahamreece519 8 місяців тому

      what?@@justaguywithapowerpole

    • @MadnessIncVP
      @MadnessIncVP 7 місяців тому +1

      What did you gather as to the actual locations, of the scammers behind it?

    • @jack-a-lopium
      @jack-a-lopium 6 місяців тому

      Ummmm... I'm sure NO product would want you to describe a product like that... your 'paymaster' can tell you to say or do anything (legal). Yeah, it's not a scam... you're just an uneducated UA-camr.

  • @notoverlyacerbic9574
    @notoverlyacerbic9574 Рік тому +16191

    the fact that an attorney is not worried about using the word scam anywhere in the vicinity of a company is very telling.

    • @TheHorrorDevotee
      @TheHorrorDevotee Рік тому +1855

      Not just an attorney, specifically a civil defence attorney. THAT'S telling

    • @thekidfromcanada
      @thekidfromcanada Рік тому +88

      @@TheHorrorDevotee how does that work across countries?

    • @liammcgrath6184
      @liammcgrath6184 Рік тому +51

      SLANDERR !!😂😂😂

    • @Val.Kyrie.
      @Val.Kyrie. Рік тому +33

      That was my first thought 😅

    • @dancooper6002
      @dancooper6002 Рік тому +14

      Eh not really. People get away with everything these days.

  • @magikot
    @magikot Рік тому +3423

    I'm so glad you pointed out that these are basically land NFTs, because that's exactly what they are. It's like the "buy a star" companies back in the 90s and early 00s, none of which still exist.

    • @DeathnoteBB
      @DeathnoteBB Рік тому +353

      At least the star ones were kind of common sense. Like you can’t visit it, and obviously nobody else knows it’s “your” star. But it’s a cute and romantic gift. But this is just a scam.

    • @GalacticalHistorian
      @GalacticalHistorian Рік тому +173

      They actually still do exist. Some friends of mine “bought a star” around a year ago

    • @tylerkay825
      @tylerkay825 Рік тому +61

      Damn what am I going to do with all the collected stars?

    • @thishandleisalreadytaken449
      @thishandleisalreadytaken449 Рік тому +35

      THANK YOU! As soon as I saw this stuff the first thing that popped into my head was those star certificates.

    • @nuvotion-live
      @nuvotion-live 11 місяців тому +11

      What are you talking about lol. The stars are still there.

  • @lizfisher1234
    @lizfisher1234 7 місяців тому +1042

    Funny Story. My co-worker had an established titles purchased for her for her birthday. She had already planned a big trip to Ireland with her best friend, so they decided to use GPS to go find her "plot of land". When she got there all she found was a big garbage can. There was a pub nearby so they thought perhaps the GPS was wrong and thats where the established titles was based out of. So they went in and they asked about the GPS coordinates. The first thing the bartender said was "Bought you a plot o'land, did ya?". Her heart sank as she said yes. He said that they get people just like her in there every so often with the same GPS coordinates looking for their 1 foot plot of land. He doesn't know why they chose his coordinates, but they did, and there's nothing there and he's not affiliated in any way with them. She asked if she's at least a lady, and he said no lol. So she asked for a beer and he said that he could give her.

    • @notme222
      @notme222 6 місяців тому +139

      Well that's awkward. (For her. Funny for the rest.) Their competitor Highland Titles - who I haven't bought from yet but I'm considering it - openly invites visitors. They are a nature reserve and will not only direct you they sometimes have guided tours. Obviously you're still not legally a Lord or Lady, but if you're doing it for a laugh they're doing about as responsibly as you could hope.

    • @non_brewed_condiment
      @non_brewed_condiment 6 місяців тому +70

      ​@@notme222so the thing I don't understand is: If you're doing it for a laugh why does that have to be a purchase? Why does a company have to be involved at all? If everyone knows it's not true and it's just for fun why not just print out a piece of paper that says "you are a.." and then fill in whatever you want? You could even frame it. People mention the conversation effort, but if you donated everything you'd spend on one of these companies directly to conversation it would help a lot more than a dollar.

    • @non_brewed_condiment
      @non_brewed_condiment 6 місяців тому +13

      @@notme222 lmao oops. Conservation

    • @Julia-lk8jn
      @Julia-lk8jn 5 місяців тому +36

      Wait a second, a trip to Ireland? I thought Established Titles is playing around with Scottish 'land' ?

    • @Julia-lk8jn
      @Julia-lk8jn 5 місяців тому +3

      @@notme222 That's interesting to know. Are they doing this "You can call yourself XY" shpeel or do they stress the nature reserve aspect?

  • @zedeeyen30
    @zedeeyen30 Рік тому +11040

    As a Sottish person, I rolled my eyes at their ad the very first time I saw it. Not only is it an obvious scam, it's not even a new scam. I first heard of someone selling this stuff, via magazine ad, back in the 80s.

    • @anthonyhiggins7409
      @anthonyhiggins7409 Рік тому +532

      Had the same response. Become a Laird? Aye, ‘cause it’s that simple. Lol
      And that lot are on the road to abolishment soon too…

    • @Xylia-lynn
      @Xylia-lynn Рік тому +345

      Tbh I am not even skottish and I knew of this thing before they started advertising but i always knew of it as a stupid scam and joke thing.. was confused when so many youtubers started advertising it.

    • @Hans-gb4mv
      @Hans-gb4mv Рік тому +383

      It's the same as selling pieces of land on the moon. Good luck getting anyone on Earth to recognize that ownership...

    • @jenphillips3212
      @jenphillips3212 Рік тому +97

      The first time I saw a vid with sponsorship from these charlatans it made me cringe, as someone of Scottish birth it made me cringe even more. Thank you for the debunk.

    • @eTiMaGo
      @eTiMaGo Рік тому +67

      I vaguely remember the same kind of pitch in the 90s/early 2000s internet...

  • @Francesc2000
    @Francesc2000 Рік тому +20041

    When companies have to explain why they are not a scam, they usually are a scam.

    • @lolmanboss
      @lolmanboss Рік тому +334

      Unless they slap down the legal code where its written. Then its ok.

    • @suspectedstar
      @suspectedstar Рік тому +138

      Bragging about Trustpilot is usually an indication. Using Trustpilot at all is a red flag.

    • @MrSnakekaplan
      @MrSnakekaplan Рік тому +98

      Maybe by the strict definition of a scam, but really you didn't lose anything. Instead of been loophole lord that has no power, you are a novelty lord that has no power...
      I didn't buy into it because like most people, i have other shit im saving for. I just can't imagine anybody buying in with any legitimate intentions in mind.

    • @tomgl6684
      @tomgl6684 Рік тому +174

      @@MrSnakekaplan So this company is selling something that isn't what it first appears to be and the customers are the shady ones for buying it? Er, okay...

    • @HasufelyArod
      @HasufelyArod Рік тому +3

      This comment as well as the memes teaches me so much.
      Thank you.

  • @plannein
    @plannein Рік тому +2377

    They consistently say "if you buy this, you can refer to yourself as a Lord or Lady." I can refer to myself as whatever I want in most cases.

    • @Inky3417
      @Inky3417 11 місяців тому +83

      I refer to you as @plannein

    • @biggiganticbones
      @biggiganticbones 11 місяців тому +33

      I know how people can call you lord.
      Other people call me lord, but,
      I only inherited from my dad.
      You may need to buy land and have people live there.
      By taking money from people living on your land*,
      you become a landlord.
      Haha
      *Ofc do it with necessary permits

    • @Franky566
      @Franky566 11 місяців тому +32

      in the USA there is legaly no distinction between a baron and anyone els... all royal and noble titles are banned in the USA.

    • @Middle-Road.Kim.K
      @Middle-Road.Kim.K 11 місяців тому +24

      My thoughts as well. I can legally change my first name to "Lady" and my middle name to "Kim". If I use the first-middle name thing like Billy-Joe or Ann-Marie and people interpret my first name as a title, well, what can I do? 😂
      Heck, I don't even have to do it legally, just have a nickname. Simple, free, done.

    • @doc_vader2776
      @doc_vader2776 11 місяців тому +21

      In the age of variable pronouns, why buy land when you can legally change your pronouns to lord or lady.

  • @ashurean
    @ashurean Рік тому +1261

    When I was a kid, I saw stories about people paying to "buy" stars and land on the moon or Mars. It was such an obvious scam that even back then I realized it was silly. Then these ads started popping up and I was like "here we go again"

    • @genio2509
      @genio2509 Рік тому +43

      I think there I heard once that a Spanish woman "Bought the Sun" and was going to court to claim it 😂
      But yes, that is just too silly to believe, really surprising people actually bought stars and Mars land.

    • @aceoflights.
      @aceoflights. Рік тому +42

      Yeah. As a kid I always thought. Okay, well I can just point at a star and say "that one's mine" and it has the exact same effect.

    • @Balotovi
      @Balotovi Рік тому +24

      @@genio2509 So let's just assume the judge was very drunk or whatever and confirmed her claim to the sun (and also nobody contests that verdict) - what the hell was she gonna do with it? Sell it to the next person to have a senseless claim to it as if the sun was some dumb NFT-pic? Or was she going to start building real estate on the sun? Just what do you do with an enormous, unreachable, burning ball in your possession? xD

    • @genio2509
      @genio2509 Рік тому +12

      @@Balotovi idk, maybe build a house in there?
      Or another good idea is, like two years ago there was this meme here in Mexico about the president wanting to put a tax on solar energy. So maybe she can charge money for using the Sun, so just seeing it's light 😂

    • @genio2509
      @genio2509 Рік тому +21

      @@Balotovi I just searched for some news and apparently she went to court to indeed CHARGE for using it, like it can't get more stupid than that 🤣
      Edit: You should probably research because I found things like a notary signing a paper saying she owned the Sun and people charging her for sun burns and skin cancer since she owned the Sun that cause those 😂

  • @JABRIEL251
    @JABRIEL251 Рік тому +11893

    "They're basically making Land NFTs". He has a point.

    • @basteala525
      @basteala525 Рік тому +266

      Yeah as soon as he got into the digital certificate that thought jumped to mind. Glad I wasn't alone.

    • @descendency
      @descendency Рік тому +122

      I almost died laughing at that notion.

    • @Leviathanlight
      @Leviathanlight Рік тому +41

      Makes sense though. If parts of business can be bought and sold why not land. It isn't rent you would own your plot. But you would be on a larger plot owned by a private owner.

    • @mattpotter8725
      @mattpotter8725 Рік тому +56

      Which would be fine if that was what it was advertised as, but it isn't!!!

    • @agin1519
      @agin1519 Рік тому +11

      Is there a wild gambling market with Established Titles certificates? That seems almost…misleading Legal Eagle!

  • @insane_troll
    @insane_troll Рік тому +6745

    The legal loophole is that you can title yourself practically anything you want. Whether anyone else is going to agree to call you that is another question entirely.

    • @rmyoung87
      @rmyoung87 Рік тому +315

      True, they only said you can refer to yourself as X. You can indeed refer to oneself as anything! Whether or not there will be legal recognition of that identity or anything inherent that follows with that identity is another thing altogether. [Off topic: this is why many trans people go through the efforts of legally changing their official sex on paper. You can call yourself a man or woman all you want, but you have a legal identity of one or the other assigned at birth which retains itself unless you successfully go through the process of changing.]

    • @-Dazai-
      @-Dazai- Рік тому +7

      Well they have to

    • @iafozzac
      @iafozzac Рік тому +358

      Actually, you might run into trouble if you do that in Europe, as some countries do have laws regulating noble and knighthood titles

    • @names_are.uselessyt7908
      @names_are.uselessyt7908 Рік тому +97

      hmmm, that sounds like preferred pronouns

    • @Divergent_Integral
      @Divergent_Integral Рік тому +334

      @@iafozzac Academic titles too. Here in the Netherlands it's illegal to call yourself Dr. or PhD if you're not actually one.

  • @CorentinRBR
    @CorentinRBR 10 місяців тому +225

    The crazy thing is that they may have never bought any plot of land in Scotland for Established Titles as they don't need to show any proof of it and they seem to never run out of plots to sell.

    • @damien678
      @damien678 10 місяців тому +46

      Right??? Scotland has such a small amount of land, this would have been an incredibly finite 'product' if it was legit

    • @ussinussinongawd516
      @ussinussinongawd516 4 місяці тому

      They're selling 1x1 feet Scotland has enough land for that 😂😂​@@damien678

    • @anonanon8057
      @anonanon8057 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@damien678 A 1 sq foot plot is tiny. 1 acre which gives 43560 sq feet in some remote part of the highland would cost very little.

    • @TellURide447
      @TellURide447 Місяць тому +1

      They said they have 200 acres. That’s more than 8.7 million sq ft. Sounds like a lot but there’s a lot of people out there that came across this pitch and fell for it. Weather or not it’s right or wrong. The owners of established titles are the ones that have to hold it within their conscience of what they’re doing

    • @anonanon8057
      @anonanon8057 Місяць тому

      @@TellURide447 This may just be because I'm Scottish but I'm struggling to see how this can actually scam anyone. What they're buying is bs that only a vain moron would get but they do still get the meaningless bit of paper they pay for. And even if they're dumb enough to think owning any land in Scotland makes you a lord then there are 2 million plus lords including me just from Scottish people who own a house. So it wouldn't be of any significance.

  • @edenjung9816
    @edenjung9816 Рік тому +621

    If you want to support reforestation in Scotland, consider supporting Trees for life.
    My former highschool has worked with them since 2010 and we always had groups of students go there during the school year for 2 weeks to help them out.
    Was quite nice.

    • @snekysneks
      @snekysneks Рік тому +44

      Mossy Earth is the one I support. They are helping reforest Scotland and many other places. They are also doing many other projects like reintroducing animal species and restoring rarer ecosystems. They have a channel on UA-cam so you can see everything they do.

    • @JayCares
      @JayCares 11 місяців тому

      @@snekysneks ok.

    • @thepinkestpigglet7529
      @thepinkestpigglet7529 14 днів тому

      Don't think that's why anyone is buying this stuff

  • @jeddjoseph237
    @jeddjoseph237 Рік тому +1181

    The problem that Establish titles has is that the disclaimers ONLY CAME OUT AFTER the video trashing them came out. The way back machine was used to check if the disclaimers were there before, they were not. That's the problem, they were only trying to cover their tracks

    • @MaestroKatProductions
      @MaestroKatProductions Рік тому +119

      Welp, the wayback machine once again saves the day!

    • @Julia-lk8jn
      @Julia-lk8jn Рік тому +80

      Hurray for the Way Back When machine, I'll have to donate them 10 bucks this year for their work. (Sorry, I know it's not much! Neither is my income.)
      Just them pulling the rug from under thus "but look, disclaimer!!!!" stunt is worth it.

    • @reddragon7762
      @reddragon7762 Рік тому +79

      Yep. I bought it 2 years ago. Read terms and conditions, website, and all fine print I could find. They even directly said I could legally have my driver license name changed to include Lord.
      There wasn't anything saying or even hinting that I couldn't whilst they directly said I could.
      Result: I couldn't. Couldn't get refund either.

    • @matthewgillies7509
      @matthewgillies7509 Рік тому +45

      Meanwhile, I've been reporting their ads as fraud on Google and Facebook since day one.

    • @christinebenson518
      @christinebenson518 Рік тому +5

      @@reddragon7762 So you believe that you can actually buy a title? That's on you.

  • @corvusdove874
    @corvusdove874 Рік тому +2385

    As a friend who runs an occult shop once told me, "Whenever you hear about something 'ancient' or 'forgotten' in advertising, it's crap. People like me have been using it to sell glass spheres and cheap pewter necklaces for centuries as crystal balls and talismans to tourists and rebellious teenagers. We keep the real stuff in the back."

    • @Marta1Buck
      @Marta1Buck Рік тому +2

      Charlatans

    • @gamecokben
      @gamecokben Рік тому +367

      Spoiler alert: there is no "Real stuff"

    • @Bubbles99718
      @Bubbles99718 Рік тому +198

      @@gamecokben no duh, kinda missed the gag Captain

    • @Earthstar_Review
      @Earthstar_Review Рік тому +7

      I'm pretty sure I heard this too. I miss him.

    • @dzhellek
      @dzhellek Рік тому +60

      Ancient I can see as possible but if it's forgotten how does anyone know about it?

  • @subsonicatomic6853
    @subsonicatomic6853 11 місяців тому +493

    I've run into at least one person who took it very seriously. She got legit offended I didn't recognize her as an actual lady lol

    • @Cat-sf1mi
      @Cat-sf1mi 8 місяців тому +16

      one of my old middle school teachers i ran into didn’t take it seriously but he was so proud of his and his wife’s adjoining plots or whatever 😭😭 i did not have the heart to tell him i knew it was a scam even though i learned of it months ago

    • @npip99
      @npip99 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Cat-sf1mi If he didn't take it seriously then it's not a scam. Esp if they have neighboring plots.

    • @MadnessIncVP
      @MadnessIncVP 7 місяців тому

      Please tell me you offed them. Anybody taking this seriously, cannot be allowed to reproduce.

    • @Cat-sf1mi
      @Cat-sf1mi 7 місяців тому +8

      @@npip99 he didn’t make us call him a lord or anything but he didn’t get the title that was advertised for him which is why it’s a scam

    • @imMalpa12455
      @imMalpa12455 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Cat-sf1miMy old middle school teacher did too haha

  • @camellia8625
    @camellia8625 Рік тому +716

    I completely agree with your description of it as NFTs.
    My ex fiancé was a “Lord”- he had bought the title through a scheme such as you describe and then used the title to give him credibility for organised crime purposes for which he was on parole from a 10 year jail sentence. He was predictably dubbed Lord Fraud by one newspaper. I literally had no idea about the “Lordship” or the criminal background as I met him through a dating site.

    • @DrSpaceman69
      @DrSpaceman69 Рік тому +62

      Wtf

    • @tylerontopfrfr
      @tylerontopfrfr Рік тому +34

      💀💀💀

    • @kyh148
      @kyh148 Рік тому +69

      crime lord ☠️☠️

    • @RedFail1-1
      @RedFail1-1 11 місяців тому +45

      Some part of this isn’t true. Just can’t figure out what.

    • @anyexpat
      @anyexpat 10 місяців тому +14

      Are you Lady Gullible ?

  • @RossetaStoned91
    @RossetaStoned91 Рік тому +1335

    This is literally the same scam the "Buy a Star" people pulled. They would send a certificate with a listed dedicated star, but it isn't recognized on any registry other than the company's. And since they are essentially selling nothing but a piece of paper and frame, they could pour all their money into advertisements.

    • @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368
      @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 Рік тому +48

      People are dumb. They will derive life meaning and self-worth through their purchases.
      We all do it. We're programmed to.

    • @commandblocktech9698
      @commandblocktech9698 Рік тому +18

      He does mention it in the video...

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior Рік тому +11

      Yes, I've sold the Brooklyn Bridge at least 100 times, now. (not really)

    • @chuckfilming
      @chuckfilming Рік тому +10

      i mean is that a scam? who actually believes they own a star haha

    • @ThePurpleCheesecakeZebra
      @ThePurpleCheesecakeZebra Рік тому +29

      @@chuckfilming i was brought this as a kid who was into spacey stuff. it was a nice gift and atleast came with a bunch of cool booklets of info and a map where you could plot out where your non existent star was. i doubt id ever come accross someone with the same gift and the same star assigned to them so its atleast a fun gift idea.
      with the established titles id be really pissed off because the only thing you get is a fake certificate and it means nothing. atleast in my delusion as a kid i could dream about going to the equator and finding my star. if i went to scotland to find my foot of land to discover its a lake or other unusable piece of land id be pissed

  • @josephconnelly7939
    @josephconnelly7939 Рік тому +2019

    At least with the pet rock I purchased in the 70's, you got the actual rock, the packaging that doubles as it's nest and the extremely hilarious hand book for care of said rock.

    • @MrCh0o
      @MrCh0o Рік тому +255

      You also technically own a former piece of land represented in that rock

    • @josephconnelly7939
      @josephconnelly7939 Рік тому +255

      @@MrCh0o I guess that makes me a Rock Lord then.

    • @manictiger
      @manictiger Рік тому +151

      @@josephconnelly7939
      Stoned lord

    • @carlam6669
      @carlam6669 Рік тому +57

      Original Pet Rocks are available on eBay for buy it now price of $50. Make sure you get the handbook and cardboard box; that’s where the value is.

    • @notdoot9941
      @notdoot9941 Рік тому +21

      I would rock that pet infront of everyone

  • @MindZye
    @MindZye Рік тому +296

    22:05 - "I don't think anyone is earnestly purchasing Established Titles thinking they now own land are literally a lord." And yet, this is the exact impression I got from all of the UA-cam plugs ET paid for.

    • @averysspookshowspectacular6205
      @averysspookshowspectacular6205 10 місяців тому +27

      RIGHT? The ones I was most upset with were the ones that talked about putting lord or lady on checks, passports, credit cards, that sort of thing. They were either stupid or scummy and either way was very disappointing.

    • @MrCmon113
      @MrCmon113 10 місяців тому +14

      That's the exact thing they were claiming. That was literally the entire point of their product. Owning land in Scotland and becoming a lord in Scotland.

    • @masterdeetectiv9520
      @masterdeetectiv9520 10 місяців тому +9

      Yeah to anyone unfamiliar with how nobility works it can look legit

    • @daledullnig1778
      @daledullnig1778 7 місяців тому +13

      Absolutely. All the comments about "you're an idiot if you believed the advertising" are mildly infuriating; we've had voting rights of all things legally tied to land ownership, an empty title is highly plausible.
      Easily could have been a law passed in 1493 by a bunch of people in power who wanted to be called lords and then as the nobility stopped being relevant, the law also stopped being relevant.

    • @ChibiPanda8888
      @ChibiPanda8888 6 місяців тому +1

      Yeah, i got duped by this.
      Learned my lesson.

  • @areyouwelldoyouhavebrainda2023
    @areyouwelldoyouhavebrainda2023 9 місяців тому +121

    I'm such a cynical and sceptical person that when I read "You may choose to title yourself as lord/laird/lady", I just immediately knew it was a scam. If something I'm buying or signing doesn't explicitly say what I am providing the company and what they are providing to me in definite terms, then that is a hugeeeeee red flag.

    • @daledullnig1778
      @daledullnig1778 7 місяців тому +1

      One might assume that any of the three become valid depending on your gender or spelling preference. Seems reasonably definite to me.

    • @areyouwelldoyouhavebrainda2023
      @areyouwelldoyouhavebrainda2023 7 місяців тому +4

      @@daledullnig1778 You misunderstood. The problematic bit is the part that says "You 'may choose'(...)".

    • @teathesilkwing7616
      @teathesilkwing7616 6 місяців тому

      @@areyouwelldoyouhavebrainda2023
      To be fair I’m sure real lords can also choose whether or not they want to be referred to as lords, I doubt they’re forced to call themselves one.

    • @areyouwelldoyouhavebrainda2023
      @areyouwelldoyouhavebrainda2023 5 місяців тому +5

      @@teathesilkwing7616 I agree with that, but the problem is in the language of the contract imo. Imagine if we signed a contract that says "you give me a thousand dollars after which you may choose to title yourself as owner of my house". It doesn't say you're the owner of my house, and it doesn't give you any exclusive legal right that you didn't have before. You can call yourself the owner of my house at any moment of your choosing, and it's completely free too! If you do wish to give me money for that, I would still be grateful 😂

  • @DeadInDenton
    @DeadInDenton Рік тому +4809

    As a Scot, every time a UA-camr launches into an Established Titles sponsorship ad, my eye starts to twitch uncontrollably.

    • @PonyGirl004
      @PonyGirl004 Рік тому +78

      You really shouldn't -I think most people know this for what it is but sadly most people will never get the chance to go anywhere near Scotland. It's all we have for our love of Braveheart, the bagpipes and the kilts.

    • @mhenderson7673
      @mhenderson7673 Рік тому +108

      Yeah it's so blindingly obviously a scam

    • @kennethferland5579
      @kennethferland5579 Рік тому +91

      Well consider this, atleast people LIKE Scottland enough to want to be a lord of it, that something you can thumb in the nose of the English.

    • @kennethferland5579
      @kennethferland5579 Рік тому +1

      @@michaelmurdock4607 That's not really all that unreasonable that your decended from so family that had lands and seals and all that stuff. Remember not everyone inherits the wealth or keeps it if they do. Prior to contraception and modern medicine the elites of society consistently had more children then peasants, every few generation the peasant class had been completly replaced by disinherited and failed nobility.

    • @LordPhantom1305
      @LordPhantom1305 Рік тому +10

      By reading your comment I got a cough attack that almost caused my death.

  • @readyforlol
    @readyforlol Рік тому +2522

    "Implications are not necessarily false advertising"
    And this is why so many scams are legal in the US.

    • @p_mouse8676
      @p_mouse8676 Рік тому +235

      What blows my mind the most, is how common it is to talk down on competitors. In some cases pretty harsh and damaging. Also when it comes down to political ads.
      In many countries that's legally an absolute no-no.

    • @TheAwesomeTolga198
      @TheAwesomeTolga198 Рік тому

      Thank goodness.

    • @cgi2002
      @cgi2002 Рік тому +164

      ​@@p_mouse8676in many countries political ads themselves are barely legal and come with some extremely harsh requirements, spending allowances, and clear notification of who paid for them and who they support, oh and attack ads are just basically forbidden.

    • @deleted-something
      @deleted-something Рік тому

      Ye

    • @Seoul_Soldier
      @Seoul_Soldier Рік тому +150

      @@p_mouse8676 People honestly don't realize how much of a hellscape America from a law standpoint. Political attack ads alone shouldn't be legal.

  • @cereal_chick2515
    @cereal_chick2515 Рік тому +115

    Another dimension to consider is that if Established Titles really were selling titles of nobility, they would have been committing an crime under the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925. You can actually go to prison for it! When Toby Blair was Prime Minister, he was questioned by the police when it was alleged that he had been selling peerages, although he wasn't charged in the end.

    • @faithlesshound5621
      @faithlesshound5621 10 місяців тому +13

      That odd thing about this is that most of the people capable of actually selling you a title (as opposed to taking your money and then not coming up with the goods) are too influential to be prosecuted: prime ministers, party chairmen, etc. The history of people becoming very rich and somehow acquiring a title without a background of good works or political activity strongly suggests that money does change hands. It's just unclear who gets the money, and how much. Only Lloyd George had a scale of fees that we know about. Currently a Russian oligarch wishing to become a Lord would have to cough up at least a million pounds.
      The most flagrant historic example must be the Grosvenor family, who own formerly agricultural land in Mayfair. They ascended the levels of the peerage over several centuries and the current Duke of Westminster may be the richest man in England. Many brewers became barons in the 19th century: they formed the "beerage." Fortunes made from slaves in the West Indies or the India-China opium trade bought landed estates, parliamentary seats ("pocket boroughs") and titles of nobility.

    • @katrinabryce
      @katrinabryce 6 місяців тому +4

      @@faithlesshound5621 It costs £3m in party donations to become a Lord, allegedly.

  • @livesouthernable
    @livesouthernable Рік тому +143

    If you have to put disclaimers on lemon dish soap telling people not to drink it, then we shouldn’t assume everyone knew this was fake. I’ve seen all the ads, and this was never marketed as a gag gift. The CEO is still trying to walk the line by saying she’s selling a title really but not really.

    • @teathesilkwing7616
      @teathesilkwing7616 6 місяців тому +19

      They’re just trying to keep that delicious soap for themselves. I’ve drank for bittls an feel fine. It all a big conspdjiwjwnrnsm

    • @livesouthernable
      @livesouthernable 6 місяців тому +6

      @@teathesilkwing7616 thank you for your comment. I’m still giggling 😆 😂

    • @teathesilkwing7616
      @teathesilkwing7616 6 місяців тому +8

      @@livesouthernable *muffled groan of agony*

    • @missvidabom
      @missvidabom 4 місяці тому +1

      This is perfectly put.

  • @sophiophile
    @sophiophile Рік тому +5697

    The most hilarious part of ET, that I didn't see in any video, was that you could not purchase the item if you are in *Scotland*.

    • @maggiepie8810
      @maggiepie8810 Рік тому +120

      😂😂😂

    • @waroftheworlds2008
      @waroftheworlds2008 Рік тому +857

      That screams scam by itself. (You can't buy this if you most likely know its a scam.)

    • @richardpike8748
      @richardpike8748 Рік тому +96

      wow i didnt know that either lmao

    • @SRQBID
      @SRQBID Рік тому +554

      So you can't ask or make attempts to go see your "land"... 🤫

    • @timothylopez8572
      @timothylopez8572 Рік тому +103

      From the tv show "boondocks"
      "It's 'A Pimped Named Slickback', you say the whole thing"

  • @DEFxRECON
    @DEFxRECON Рік тому +12555

    The tonal whiplash of LegalEagle being all professional and using legal terms, and then referring to himself as “your boy” is something lol

    • @wildfire9280
      @wildfire9280 Рік тому +326

      It’s like if Guzma went into law school instead of a gang.

    • @imperatorvult
      @imperatorvult Рік тому +409

      who better to report on these very serious allegations than YA BOI LEGALEAGLE.

    • @TheVikingKing125
      @TheVikingKing125 Рік тому +237

      It's my favorite part of LegalEagle. It shows that lawyers are still just people too. Makes them feel more approachable.

    • @viderevero1338
      @viderevero1338 Рік тому +26

      Caught that too. Honestly threw me off guard XD.

    • @NativeTexMexican
      @NativeTexMexican Рік тому +23

      I like it...😐👍

  • @kurtru5selcrowe607
    @kurtru5selcrowe607 Рік тому +147

    I have never once heard Established Titles sold as a novelty or gag gift.

    • @YaoEspirito
      @YaoEspirito 10 місяців тому +16

      Those words were added to their promos only after all the revelations of their scam arose. Those words were not initially in their ads.

    • @MsLucyJayne
      @MsLucyJayne 8 місяців тому +3

      They’re running lots of ads on Facebook currently (October 2023) & nowhere do they say it’s a novelty or gag gift!

  • @minechatz
    @minechatz Рік тому +25

    This is especially funny because developing in Scotland (maybe the UK writ large, idk) is VERY DIFFICULT. The gov makes getting planning permission hard as hell. So the contract not to develop on the land is literally just. "Give me $50 and I won't go through zoning hell." lol

  • @ArJayDM
    @ArJayDM Рік тому +969

    everytime I saw this ad on youtubers videos; I always thought to myself, "you can't even visit the land, they can literally just re-sell the same plot to multiple people and no one would know or care."

    • @Zanza007
      @Zanza007 Рік тому +94

      They advertised last year that you could visit the land if you were in Scotland. It was on the FAQ page. The claim was you could have a picnic there but that you'd want to buy a larger piece of land, or it might get cramped. Apparently that was just a straight up lie.
      Edited - Turns out I purchased from Highland Titles, not Established Titles...easy to see how I'd be confused though all things considered.

    • @Theproclaimed
      @Theproclaimed Рік тому +36

      And wouldn’t their whole premise mean every single landowning Scotsman is a lord or lady?

    • @marjuska9833
      @marjuska9833 Рік тому +11

      @@Theproclaimed Yes. I was thinking that too. There is lots of Lords and Ladys

    • @SuperSlimshady1
      @SuperSlimshady1 Рік тому

      Exactly

    • @cordeliaface
      @cordeliaface Рік тому +16

      And don't most land owners have taxes to pay? The concept of "you pay once and never again!" for land baffles me.
      Signed,
      An American

  • @theologyincinema3208
    @theologyincinema3208 Рік тому +2055

    My family is aggressively proud of their Scottish Heritage, and are also easily duped by anything on the internet. My gullible father was heavily duped by a predecessor of this company, and actually gave up thousands of dollars to them, all while thinking he was "rebuilding our family legacy." These scams can actually hurt people pretty bad.

    • @rhetoric5173
      @rhetoric5173 Рік тому +97

      Lmao the hubris!!!

    • @lordremy1291
      @lordremy1291 Рік тому +55

      When I bought mine, I was under the assumption of building something. After learning a nitty gritty as far as laws and titles. I thought better of it luckily. Was almost in a similar predicament as your father.

    • @Albinojackrussel
      @Albinojackrussel Рік тому +187

      It's mildly amusing that your dad things his heritage is of a lord. I'm assuming you're in America, Canada, New Zealand or Australia? If so your heritage is likely extreme poverty. That's why so many Scott's left. It's why large parts of my own family (coming from a coal mining family in Edinburgh) now live in New Zealand. The only reason my own grandma didn't leave was because her father got sick and she decided to stay to look after him.

    • @pascalsimioli6777
      @pascalsimioli6777 Рік тому +1

      It's not the scams that hurt people in my opinion. It's having your identity so strongly tied to the place where your mother pushed you out of her vagina. As if the spec of dust where you were born is somehow part of your merits.

    • @sussybawka9999
      @sussybawka9999 Рік тому +107

      @@Albinojackrussel do you mean to say wealthy lords didn't just pack up their entire lives and move to the American frontier? That's wild, man.

  • @chyde8099
    @chyde8099 Рік тому +168

    I always thought the "name a star" thing would somehow get registered into an official star registry or something, not just a private nobody list. I also assumed that the advertising for Established Titles did exactly what it said on the tin. I'm so gullible...

    • @E12345E
      @E12345E 11 місяців тому +25

      hi! you’re definitely not gullible! just give me all your personal info and i will prove that to ya! (totally!) (definitely not a scam!)

    • @averysspookshowspectacular6205
      @averysspookshowspectacular6205 10 місяців тому +14

      That's how they get you. I don't think it's something to really be ashamed of because these companies use tricks that are known to work. They make it look like this fun thing so you don't think too hard about what they're saying.

    • @MrCmon113
      @MrCmon113 10 місяців тому +7

      No, you're simply acknowledging what they actually claimed.

    • @chetanphoenix
      @chetanphoenix 10 місяців тому

      @@E12345E how can I trust you? do you even have a pen?

    • @leaffinite3828
      @leaffinite3828 6 місяців тому

      ​@@MrCmon113 yeah thats what being gullible is. Falling for obvious lies

  • @bryanbreadstick
    @bryanbreadstick 4 місяці тому +26

    a scam asking a lawyer to promote them is hilarious

  • @Lil_Puppy
    @Lil_Puppy Рік тому +1473

    I always just considered things like this a novelty item instead of something that could be legally upheld. Like the "buy a star" and "buy property on the moon" ones too. They're just a "I don't like you enough to buy you something useful for your birthday" type of gifts.

    • @dharkann
      @dharkann Рік тому +113

      Well yes and no. Some people are actually aware of this is not actually giving you titles as you assumed, but you'd be surprised how gulliable/stupid/naive most people are to actually believe they are a lord/lady after a mere purchase of 30 bucks.

    • @demontferrat
      @demontferrat Рік тому +90

      A lot of people think this gives them the title, mostly because how the marketing is done, most UA-camrs I watch said explicitly that you officially become a Lord/Lady and when they state the Scottish costume of naming assigning the title as long as you own land, it contributes to that.
      And let’s be honest, how many people read terms and conditions?

    • @3nertia
      @3nertia Рік тому +1

      Welcome to capitalism - most of it is a scam ;)

    • @solinjrgensen2540
      @solinjrgensen2540 Рік тому +33

      Novelty item and legally upheld are not mutually exclusive. It's obviously a gimmick and a reasonable person wouldn't except to be able to rule, but if you pay 80 dollars to "become a lord" and they say "LOL u can call urself a lord now thanks for the money", it seems just scummy

    • @3nertia
      @3nertia Рік тому +6

      @@solinjrgensen2540 That's their entire business model though ...

  • @olivia5k25
    @olivia5k25 Рік тому +2488

    It is endlessly entertaining to me that their main legal defense about their product boils down to "it's just a prank, bro".

    • @helluvagooddrawer2027
      @helluvagooddrawer2027 Рік тому +10

      That tracks

    • @saoirsedeltufo7436
      @saoirsedeltufo7436 Рік тому

      On a similar level to Fox News defending themselves for lying by saying they were technically for entertainment not news...

    • @zackarybaker9159
      @zackarybaker9159 Рік тому +24

      They say their briefs for advertisers are clear in that they are just a novelty gift. It's on the creators who advertise. People have the wrong idea because of multiple ill-informed advertisements.

    • @daddysenpai408
      @daddysenpai408 Рік тому +86

      @@zackarybaker9159 and the same creators advertising it are claiming that they were never told it was a gag gift which I kinda believe since I watch a few youtubers with good reputations that promoted it

    • @drleal
      @drleal Рік тому +1

      Like the pepsi commercial.

  • @malbochstudios3593
    @malbochstudios3593 7 місяців тому +18

    As an English student of law - the UK legal system slander was an ouchie 🤣🤣

  • @CubanPanda
    @CubanPanda Рік тому +97

    I instantly knew Established Titles was a scam when I heard that a tree would be planted on your "plot of land". That is simply because trees need empty space around them to actually grow. If two people got a plot of land directly next to each other the trees would struggle to grow.

    • @damien678
      @damien678 10 місяців тому +13

      That, as well as the fact that Scotland has a very little amount of space in it, so if it were real it'd be quite the finite product to sell. And they were aggressively advertising.
      And what legaleagle says, if anyone that owns land is a 'lord' or 'lady' that would actually be kinda ridiculous in modern times. So many people would be that in Scotland which would probably be a well-known thing if it was true but it's not

    • @patrickhackett7881
      @patrickhackett7881 6 днів тому

      ​@@damien678 200 acres is not much land-- well under one square mile

  • @jlj2169
    @jlj2169 Рік тому +1687

    I feel bad for people who bought this for a loved one for Christmas thinking how cool it was going to be to explain to them what they got, and now there are dozens of videos explaining how they got scammed.

    • @benm3382
      @benm3382 Рік тому +61

      Meh, don't feel bad. We all at some point have to learn how blatantly other will lie and scheme, and if you haven't learned by a certain point then you can't be helped

    • @FirstNameLastName-il8ev
      @FirstNameLastName-il8ev Рік тому +70

      Really should've learned after the "name/buy a star" thing lol

    • @Sporkmaker5150
      @Sporkmaker5150 Рік тому +30

      @@FirstNameLastName-il8ev I bought a star and named it LV262831.

    • @manictiger
      @manictiger Рік тому

      These primates have another interesting scam, wherein, they have starving children pull compressed pieces of carbon out of the ground and sell them for thousands or millions of their currency... On a carbon-rich planet...

    • @n00blamer
      @n00blamer Рік тому +28

      I'd buy one for laughs if it's couple of tenners.. who cares.. people buy pet rocks and other useless trinkets too.. fools and their money don't have everlasting love affair.. =P

  • @LeSarthois
    @LeSarthois Рік тому +774

    A French UA-camr bought a title from a different website, months ago. He didn't detected the fraud (tho he emitted doubt over the legitimacy of the process) but more importantly, his certificate gave the location of the tree he planted.
    While the website advertized a "Blackwood" land/forest in Scotland, the tree was planted... in Pakistan.

    • @pdpgb
      @pdpgb Рік тому +111

      That's probably the part where they're "dedicating" the land in Scotland to you whatever that means, and the tree is being planted separately by another company. Which I guess was in Pakistan.

    • @Siberius-
      @Siberius- Рік тому

      Trees were probably being planted in Pakistan there anyway as part of a routine cycle.

    • @yiqingtan4079
      @yiqingtan4079 Рік тому +42

      Well, at least he knows sort of for sure that a tree was planted somewhere, I guess

    • @elpretender1357
      @elpretender1357 Рік тому +64

      Id' be hillarious if that tree planted in Pakistan is actually palm to use for palm oil or another for-profit crop

    • @Jeremy-ql1or
      @Jeremy-ql1or Рік тому

      You know that "plant a tree" is slang for anal sex in Pakistan, right? And "Black wood" is slang for...well, you can probably guess. I hope that French UA-camr knows what he was really paying for.

  • @dansheppard2965
    @dansheppard2965 Рік тому +29

    Many years ago, British Airways had a dropdown which listed titles in alphabetical order. The top one, "Air Vice-Marshal" was selected in the form by default. Could have saved myself a few minutes if I didn't have to scroll all the way down to M---, if I'd known I could just have left it set to Air Vice-Marshal. I think Archbishop was the second option.

    • @weijuw
      @weijuw Місяць тому

      Was there ever King or Queen or something on there?

  • @SollowP
    @SollowP 11 місяців тому +10

    It does break down the more you think about it.
    As it would mean that literally everyone who owns a house in Scotland, is considered a lord. As when they bought their house, they also bought the land it's attached to.
    Which would mean that an extremely large part of the population would be Lords/Ladies

  • @peterlewis2178
    @peterlewis2178 Рік тому +660

    What baffles me is why a scam company (or at the very least a dubious one) would approach a lawyer for a sponsorship...

    • @CrunchyBaguette
      @CrunchyBaguette Рік тому +160

      If the lawyer says yes then it makes it seem all the more legitimate.

    • @bradley3549
      @bradley3549 Рік тому +72

      If anything to me it demonstrates to me they have confidence that their gag novelty product isn't a scam. Which frankly is fair. Best anyone can tell people got exactly what they were guaranteed when they purchased. Whether they got what they THOUGHT they were buying is another topic - but caveat emptor! (Learn to read, people.)

    • @thechugg4372
      @thechugg4372 Рік тому +32

      It's the same as when nord vpn approached mutahar and he accepted, he's a channel who talks a lot about internet security so having him promote their scummy business is all the better for them.

    • @Gwyrddu
      @Gwyrddu Рік тому +19

      @@thechugg4372 So what Nord's VPN deal then? What makes them a scummy business?

    • @A_Random_Nazuna_Fan
      @A_Random_Nazuna_Fan Рік тому +13

      @@Gwyrddu in general its prices are rather outrageous, multiple cases have shown NVPN accesing rather unnecesary info and other such stuff

  • @Sylv0swe
    @Sylv0swe Рік тому +1947

    I am so happy that you brought up the fact that they use "environmental conservation" as a defense when it is clear that only a small fraction of their income actually goes to it. I feel like both defenders and critics have been really bad at mentioning it, when in my eyes it is the most important point. It seems better to just give the money directly to charity and skip having trees cut down for a bogus piece of paper.

    • @hefoxed
      @hefoxed Рік тому +34

      I'm really hoping a more environment focused channel comes out with a video on this (and I assume, green washing), as those still defending it use that as a defense, when considering the net effect including that possible the tree planting is being used to offset/tax deduct for their other brands... it's probably not overall good for environment?
      The videos keep getting wrong amount for the 2million trees, it's 25 average cents a tree as that's the amount for the charity that number is from, so even less going... :/ Someone else looked into the land claim/records and only found 55.7 acres.

    • @the98themperoroftheholybri33
      @the98themperoroftheholybri33 Рік тому +46

      It's worse, the areas they plant trees are grasslands where endangered birds like Grouse live, it also doesn't help that a lot of these charities plant Spruce which causes acidity in the soil which leech into nearby water sources killing any aquatic life in them also.
      You'd do more good paying game keepers to go on a deer or grouse shoot, because they humanely kill a sick one and the money goes into preserving their habitat and health.

    • @vario6492
      @vario6492 Рік тому +5

      But mooooom i want the bogus piece of paper!!! 😭

    • @andrewdiaz3529
      @andrewdiaz3529 Рік тому +21

      We should also talk about the charities themselves and how all these "Mass plant a tree/carbon offset charities" also have big issues; Researchers from various environmental scientific journals have found that not only are there no proven benefits of these mass tree planting groups, they actually carry significant negatives and often worsen the environment. 90% of saplings planted die due to poor care and improper conditions and due to how they are not local trees and thus unsuited to the environments they are being put in, the lands these mass plantings take place on are often stolen from native and indigenous peoples as well as nomadic groups and rural poor minorities and these plots are used to criminalize them, many times actual adult forests have been CLEARED so farmers can plant these saplings for credit with the charity or their government thus defeating the purpose, and its really just a long part of the over emphasis of forests over every other ecosystem that is actively causing important marshes and plains and other ecosystems being destroyed to plant more soon to be dead saplings. These plant a tree carbon offset "charities" prey on people's desire to do good, help the environment, without actually having TO DO ANYTHING OR MAKE ANY CHANGES which would actually help the environment; It's why big pollution companies and the companies most responsible for mass deforestation love them and talk about how much money they give to offsets.

    • @Galaxy001
      @Galaxy001 Рік тому +5

      31:05 sort of covers the point

  • @jaroslavdzurilla5103
    @jaroslavdzurilla5103 Рік тому +159

    It's a shame/embarrassing how many content creators let themselves get roped to that. Ads will get pulled down and forgotten, but their content will circulate in the UA-cam algorithm forever. Though it's refreshing to know that they are just as fallible human as anyone.

    • @averysspookshowspectacular6205
      @averysspookshowspectacular6205 10 місяців тому +9

      There were a couple of creatos I ended up not watching anymore after this (granted, my interest was probably already waning and ET was just the last straw). I saw a TV commercial once and knew it was a scam, it was clear these people didn't do any real research before taking it. The ones who would pride themselves on how thorough they were hit the hardest. Fallability is one thing, this case was just...bad.

    • @danieltobin4498
      @danieltobin4498 10 місяців тому +3

      This is why I skip most ads on creator channels

    • @LuluTheCorgi
      @LuluTheCorgi 6 місяців тому

      Money
      Thankfully Sponsorblock exists

    • @leaffinite3828
      @leaffinite3828 6 місяців тому

      Idk, i mean unless your content is aimed at kids i dont see how different it is from tv ads, and you see scams/musleading ads all the time on tv. I cant find it in me to be mad at a youtuber for getting their rent money. Especially bcuz its kind of obvious

  • @gumdrop_gaming2076
    @gumdrop_gaming2076 Рік тому +533

    “Is established titles a scam?”
    “Yes.”
    “Let’s figure out if it’s a scam.”

    • @writershard5065
      @writershard5065 Рік тому +109

      Thesis Statement, followed by working out and presenting the logic in justifying that answer. That's a very good video right there.

    • @adiaphoros6842
      @adiaphoros6842 Рік тому +48

      "Let's discuss how it's a scam." FTFY

    • @FictionWriter95
      @FictionWriter95 Рік тому +46

      State an argument/claim, present evidence supporting that claim, conclude with a summary. Literally Persuasive Writing 101.

    • @DPowered2
      @DPowered2 11 місяців тому +13

      Definition of hearing words but not understanding the meaning or context

    • @candylide
      @candylide 11 місяців тому +8

      I mean, it's better to give arguments supporting that statement other than "It just is"

  • @JBrander
    @JBrander Рік тому +1592

    Their whole "call yourself a Lord or Lady" deal is basically using the "Can I go to the bathroom? - I dunno, CAN you?" logic.
    _You will not become a Lord or Lady if you pay us +$50, but you CAN call yourself one. Also here's a paper in a frame that says you CAN call yourself a lord or lady. We don't know if others will agree, but between you and me- since you pay us. Sure kiddo, you're a lord or lady. :)_
    Basically, you are paying for a paper in a frame. That's it. You don't own any land, you don't own any official titles, you only own that paper in a frame. They forwarded your $1 to the group that does plant trees, but the rest of your money is in their pockets now.

    • @aaronlee2810
      @aaronlee2810 Рік тому +8

      Well you can visit the plot of land if you buy a large enough plot

    • @suburbia2050
      @suburbia2050 Рік тому +64

      @@aaronlee2810 land that you don't l own?

    • @B-Man-69
      @B-Man-69 Рік тому +83

      @@aaronlee2810 yeah, technically you can visit the tiny plot of land you don't own.

    • @HitodamaKyrie
      @HitodamaKyrie Рік тому +16

      While it's probably better to just donate to a charity directly if that is your goal, I don't think it's that big of a deal for some other company or whatever to profit from such a system if it means those charities receive money they never would've otherwise.
      The whole lord thing is dubious at best, and no one should be tricked, but beyond that, meh. I wouldn't buy such a thing myself.
      They could also donate more money for sure, but I don't run their checkbook and have no idea how any of that money is invested.

    • @lordcommandernox9197
      @lordcommandernox9197 Рік тому +8

      people know that, it's about the forest conservation and the planting of the trees, the certificate is just as good as "the greatest dad in the world" mug.

  • @MedlifeCrisis
    @MedlifeCrisis Рік тому +207

    Did you just call me a...cardiatric surgeon?! Lawyers just be making words up again

    • @goncalovazpinto6261
      @goncalovazpinto6261 Рік тому +15

      FIGHT!

    • @ktakashismith
      @ktakashismith Рік тому +20

      So you're telling me you're not *actually* a cardiatric surgeon like Devin says? And here I was, believing this lawyer when he told me that you were at the cutting edge of heart-reduction surgery - resecting 80% of the unnecessary heart muscle so prone to ischemic attacks, and simply fusing the perfectly adequate left atrium and right ventricle to cut down on the meaningless cardiac activity of the pulmonic circuit. Never mind the "blood dumping syndrome", that's only a side effect you have to worry about when you have the procedure done by a cardiatric surgeon less prestigious than the Greatly Titled Scottish Lord Rohin. But alas, this too is a lie.

    • @lyndsay80
      @lyndsay80 Рік тому +5

      @@ktakashismith So glad that I had a bariatric surgeon carry out my gastric sleeve surgery earlier this year, and not a cardiatric surgeon.

    • @thenathanimal2909
      @thenathanimal2909 Рік тому

      Don't have a heart attack man

    • @jeanmarkd12345
      @jeanmarkd12345 Рік тому +1

      @@ktakashismith underrated comment right there. Lmao

  • @jj4l
    @jj4l 10 місяців тому +8

    35:41 bro became coffeezilla and adopted his voice cadence and hand movements... crazyyyyyyyyy

  • @hunterchristian8372
    @hunterchristian8372 6 місяців тому +38

    He literally pulled the best coffeezilla impression and no one is even talking about it.

    • @jdog-ukapprentice7660
      @jdog-ukapprentice7660 4 місяці тому +2

      so true

    • @haidhinaqi
      @haidhinaqi 4 місяці тому +2

      That part legit looks like coffeezilla deepfake as him (this is a compliment), it’s surreal to watch. Also thank you for posting this I’ve been looking for this

    • @HalcyonRemnant
      @HalcyonRemnant 4 місяці тому +2

      I was scrolling and shocked nobody else said this lmao

    • @db_524
      @db_524 Місяць тому +1

      I know right? It was brilliant.

    • @GuardianNamick
      @GuardianNamick Місяць тому

      I didn't notice until this watch through, and honestly its so well done!

  • @Oneofakind123
    @Oneofakind123 Рік тому +4832

    The fact that a lawyer outright says "It is a SCAM" says a lot 😂

    • @espressogirl68able
      @espressogirl68able Рік тому +28

      What exactly would the scam be?
      You actually thought you'd be able to fly to Scotland and start throwing your weight around because you spent $50 on a square foot of land? Were you planning on building a castle on that square foot?? A Lord or Lady is LITERALLY what we call a Landlord or Landlady here in the US.
      But I bet you a guy can buy some fake cha-chas and become a Lady. Or a woman can buy a fake hoo-ha and become a guy. That's all legit, right?
      🤣

    • @Mostbee
      @Mostbee Рік тому +105

      @@espressogirl68able it's not fake just because it isnt natural, sintetic is the right word, a fake substantial land is a land where you can't lordify, if I rent a house the lord i talk to is the landlord because he's the lord of that substancial land, but his mom call him "son". You aren't called a Lord by someone who isn't your tenant lmao.

    • @borger298
      @borger298 Рік тому +152

      @@espressogirl68able ah yes, trans rights, very important in relation to Scottish land ownership laws.

    • @johnkingbad
      @johnkingbad Рік тому +95

      @@borger298 I can't escape the anti trans crybabies! Wherever I go, they follow! PLEASE HELP ME!!!

    • @Oh_the_humanity
      @Oh_the_humanity Рік тому +2

      ​@Cheryl Fischer being intentionally dense, really? What are you accomplishing rn?

  • @pulchrare2
    @pulchrare2 Рік тому +597

    I have one of these titles from a different company, Scottish Laird. They list publicly that it's a decorative title, not an actual peerage, the money goes towards restoring a historic castle, and you're entitled to a tour of the property if you ever go out there.

    • @acester86
      @acester86 Рік тому +106

      See that I could get behind. 😏

    • @HTx78
      @HTx78 Рік тому +4

      i do not see this… just that it is a novelty thing

    • @thetinykid4169
      @thetinykid4169 Рік тому +87

      @@HTx78 I mean it offers a pretty upfront idea of what it is and the function of what your doing. You are helping restore a castle by buying this and there's just a fun gimmick that goes it that doesn't mean anything. It's more like marketing for the real purpose and what you pay for.
      Also it offers a pretty good deal if you are going to Scotland or in Scotland because just buying guarantees a tour of a historic site. Which would be quite valuable for a tourist.

    • @cgygflkj
      @cgygflkj Рік тому +8

      That seems way better.

    • @jjcymbolic
      @jjcymbolic Рік тому +17

      Honestly, if I was guaranteed allowance to tour a castle if I visited upon purchasing, I'd be more willing to purchase. That would especially be the case if I had a visit to Scotland planned.

  • @corbinbarrett1920
    @corbinbarrett1920 Рік тому +61

    The whole scheme of Established Titles sounds like the whole idea of "naming a star" when its almost impossible to do so as well. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @eeriewaffle3938
    @eeriewaffle3938 11 місяців тому +3

    "A fun gift for a good laugh," is not a piece of paper costing me 100$.

  • @bloomnights
    @bloomnights Рік тому +649

    Established titles is basically doing the same thing my mom did when I was 5 and she gave a nasa certificate that said i was the most beautiful person in the planet lmao

    • @rickastley3033
      @rickastley3033 Рік тому +38

      Sounds like you have a good mom :)

    • @marjuska9833
      @marjuska9833 Рік тому +23

      I was thinking the same, why would you buy that Lord/Lady certificate $50 or framed certificate $100 (or whatever the prizes is) when you can easily make one basically free or buy frames less than $10?
      Btw, do you still have your nasa certificate? I'm curious😊

    • @bloomnights
      @bloomnights Рік тому +17

      @@marjuska9833 yeah... I'm sure it's... somewhere in my house lmao

    • @marjuska9833
      @marjuska9833 Рік тому

      😄

    • @espressogirl68able
      @espressogirl68able Рік тому

      I think your mom might have been scammed by NASA. No offense.
      I am now questioning that Crown I got for my birthday at Burger King.

  • @LiamRappaport
    @LiamRappaport Рік тому +1216

    I always love the “no reasonable person would actually believe what we’re saying to be true” defense.

    • @laurencebrown3822
      @laurencebrown3822 Рік тому +126

      If it's good enough for Tucker Carlson, it must be good enough for this!

    • @freddogrosso9835
      @freddogrosso9835 Рік тому +236

      Blaming the victim is an all time classic.

    • @adamjung5470
      @adamjung5470 Рік тому +113

      Pepsi, where’s my jet?

    • @CharlieQuartz
      @CharlieQuartz Рік тому +30

      It is a legitimate defense against idiots so I think it’s alright.

    • @Algebruh2407
      @Algebruh2407 Рік тому +34

      @@freddogrosso9835 I mean it is an actual defence in actual cases. Just look at the case with the guy who sued Pepsi for a fighter jet in the 90s.

  • @NateTheScot
    @NateTheScot Рік тому +259

    I honestly NEVER thought for a second that Established Titles' whole "lordship title thing" was serious. I always assumed it was a joke gift and that everyone else knew that you can't become a lord just from that and the whole thing was dumb on the face of it, so it should just be treated as such. Like when there used to be loads of those "buy a star and have it named after someone!" companies too. I was really confused when people started acting like they were being conned or something and i was like "wait, you actually took it seriously this whole time??". Maybe it's just because i'm scottish, i studied law here, and i was also friends with our local Laird until he passed (his daughter owns half of Scotland and is the 3rd largest landowner after the MoD and the Church). The whole idea was so insanely silly to me that i was flabbergasted anyone actually believed any of it xD
    Edit: LOL i just got to the part you bring up the star thing too... yep. Exactly the same deal. Just a gag gift that is supposed to be seen as such and not taken at all seriously imo.

    • @LAK_770
      @LAK_770 Рік тому +10

      Being Scottish and educated in law isn’t necessary, it’s obvious to any reasonably intelligent adult that this can’t possibly work, and honestly I think this is their best defense. Obviously they’re *implying* to rubes that they can literally become a noble, but they always have the “no reasonable person would actually believe this” defense

    • @davemedispa5107
      @davemedispa5107 11 місяців тому +6

      At this point, just go 100% meme. I friend of mine gifted me a title for Christmas as a baroness in the principate of Sealand. And I am a male. Lol.

    • @redwitch95
      @redwitch95 11 місяців тому +18

      This sort of scam has long been known as a joke in the UK, it's just a novelty gift over here. I can absolutely see it tricking Americans who have zero idea of how the aristocracy in the UK works, though, since they're used to being able to buy almost anything. Why wouldn't you be able to buy a lordship?

    • @HetaClaude
      @HetaClaude 11 місяців тому +6

      damn i thought youtubers were just promoting novelty gifts, i didn't realize people actually believed they'd be lords 💀

    • @kylewarne1265
      @kylewarne1265 11 місяців тому +10

      It comes from an American point of view of understanding nobility to be "silly figureheads" anyway.
      Like, the logic goes that lords and lady's dont actually do anything, and have no actual power or rights, they just hang around and call themselves nobles.
      I've never looked into any of these companies because it's an obvious waste of money, but at zero examination it seemed reasonable it was "legit" in that your name would be put in some legitimate legal record that you were a lord not because in bought land but because *the peerage was effectively worthless, and the state would sell anyone the title as a novelty*
      No one thought they were buying real power. They did think they were buying "legitimate" peerage which they understood to mean belonging to an archaic group which had lost enough prestige that anyone with $50 could join as a novelty.

  • @CliftonHamilton
    @CliftonHamilton 4 місяці тому +3

    Even the $8 a month recurring payment- that has nothing to do with your original novelty purchase, and is at least 83% profit. They could even give half the money to tree planting. That's absurd.

  • @annapruitt5546
    @annapruitt5546 Рік тому +1099

    In the same statement, they warned that people should NOT go to the bank and try to get a loan using their new title, but then said you could title yourself and go to the bank and get a credit card (and a plane ticket) with your title in front of your legal name. Even the company couldn’t give a clear explanation without contradictions and corrections lol

    • @MuzzyBarker
      @MuzzyBarker Рік тому +62

      Customizing your credit card is very different from establishing a line of credit.

    • @jakep8921
      @jakep8921 Рік тому +10

      Why would you even think of using this title to get a loan? Did you think having an "established title" would impact your credit or something?

    • @AKbaby89
      @AKbaby89 Рік тому +14

      You can put any name on a credit card, that is nowhere near the same thing as getting a line of credit in a made up name.

    • @Darknesssleeps
      @Darknesssleeps Рік тому +24

      Because you can put whatever you want on your credit card. It’s your card. You can put Dr on your card if you want with no proof. It’s just personalization. Securing a loan would be falsely identifying yourself. I could put poopy pants on my CC if I wanted to

    • @bigbubba0439
      @bigbubba0439 Рік тому +5

      Literally one of the daily wire people said you could put "Lord" on your PASSPORT. I like the Daily Wire, but man they messed up on this one

  • @badrequest5596
    @badrequest5596 Рік тому +381

    The problem here is those statements on the site were recently added AFTER the video came out exposing them. Before that, there was no mention of it being a novelty and not legally binding. You can see this in the "way back machine" website.

    • @NickBosshard
      @NickBosshard Рік тому +21

      reply to boost this comment

    • @FairZack
      @FairZack Рік тому +14

      Was going to comment this too. A lot was indeed added after they were called out, which is very very shady.

    •  Рік тому +17

      Let's bump this up. This is a scam just like when someone says something and people get mad and as defense that person says 'I was kidding'. It's just a coward scammer who got caught and now keeps repeating "I never meant it like that".

    • @Contrajoe
      @Contrajoe Рік тому +1

      That's ludicrous

    • @Fresco272
      @Fresco272 Рік тому +1

      Exactly!

  • @brad1ey50
    @brad1ey50 Рік тому +55

    If Established Titles confuses youtubers into saying what they’re implying then Established Titles must be in the wrong.

  • @Dariu_5
    @Dariu_5 11 місяців тому +12

    To be honest, I'm the saltiest to learn about how cheap it actually is to plant trees. I figured they aren't just throwing an acorn in the woods and calling it a day, so I assumed it would cost at least a few dollars. I knew going in I would have no real title claim, and that although I could drive up to the coordinates they give me and take pictures next to some dirt, it didn't belong to me in any meaningful sense. Both me and my husband still proudly hang the stupid certificate and call each other 'your lordship' from time to time. But ultimately, I wouldn't have bought it if it wasn't supporting a creator and planting some trees so... yeah.
    Also little heartbeat skip when you pulled your tie out, where's the PG-13 warning?

  • @taitbanksproductions9105
    @taitbanksproductions9105 Рік тому +614

    Great video as always! As a Scottish lawyer, one thing to note is that the 1979 Act has since been mostly repealed by the Land Registration etc. (Scotland) Act 2012. Don't worry though, Section 22 of the 2012 Act still bans "souvenir plots" in the same way as the 1979 Act. Also, a quick look at the Land Register of Scotland confirms Established Title's land as not being the beautiful Highland paradise it implies, but a patch of boggy roadside ground around 20 miles from the English border. False Advertising for sure!

    • @showingthelinks8441
      @showingthelinks8441 Рік тому +6

      Same with the Anne of Green Gables one not to long ago, it was just some side plots.

    • @queeny5613
      @queeny5613 Рік тому +12

      Ahahah that’s what I assumed it was, I just thought it was some moterway verges

    • @nancyzehr3679
      @nancyzehr3679 Рік тому +6

      That said, re the bog, so maybe one buys the foot of bog, and the trees are reforesting some other lands. It's not stated where the trees are planted.

    • @roguedeathangel
      @roguedeathangel Рік тому +1

      Came to the comments to say exactly this!

    • @BarryHWhite
      @BarryHWhite Рік тому

      Git it up them. Mair money than sense.

  • @LittleGreenSoldier
    @LittleGreenSoldier Рік тому +440

    One of their competitors, Scottish Laird, is quite a bit more honest about their purpose. There's a historic building (Dunan's Castle, a small residence that was built up into a mock castle in the 1860s) that was destroyed by fire in 2001 and they're rebuilding and restoring it. Buying a "Lairdship" (which they state up front is only a decorative title) also gets you a guided tour of the building and grounds, and you can camp and fish there if you decide to actually fly out.

    • @xolotlnephthys
      @xolotlnephthys Рік тому +49

      You can camp there even if you haven't bought anything. It's legal to in Scotland anyway

    • @KasumiRINA
      @KasumiRINA Рік тому +1

      @@xolotlnephthys The other catch seems to be is that people donating feel they're getting a tour but most won't actually come there... so it's more of an invitation coupon. I'd pick an actual fund to donate instead... like Come Back Alive. Their Black Box project guarantees explosions on russian strategic airfields, saving a world from nuclear war by, well, helping Ukrainian army destroy russia. Best investment ever!

    • @thomasdillon6001
      @thomasdillon6001 Рік тому +16

      @@xolotlnephthys This would depend on how close to the building you want to camp.
      The 'Right to Roam' in Scotland excludes camping on the 'curtilage' around buildings. This generally means the immediate area necessary for use and enjoyment of the building itself, so roughly where a moderate private garden might be. The grounds on a house like this are probably big enough that this isn't an issue, but it's worth bearing in mind.
      (Otherwise the Right to Roam is a very generous law which I think other countries should copy! They have it in Sweden as well.)

    • @Caffeine.And.Carvings
      @Caffeine.And.Carvings Рік тому

      @@thomasdillon6001 problem is, in Sweden most places are actually private property and the spots that are free to camp are packed full of campers starting 3pm. It sounds good on paper, but in reality a good free camping spot is really hard to come by

  • @elisamedina5068
    @elisamedina5068 Рік тому +9

    I honestly thought that the "buying of the land" wasn't ACTUALLY owning the land but like, because they talked about trees and the environment and stuff, that it meant that I was paying for someone to plant trees on that foot of land or whatever, and the certificate was more of a souvenir, like, I don't know much about international law, but both my parents are lawyers so when my dad heard one of the UA-camrs I watch sponsor established titles thought there must be a misunderstanding somewhere cause it didn't make sense

  • @jon_j__
    @jon_j__ 6 місяців тому +3

    @35:00 Waitaminute... Coffeezilla let you record in his million dollar studio?!

  • @Silvercrypto-xk4zy
    @Silvercrypto-xk4zy Рік тому +815

    The biggest problem is they made the claim that you “legally” become a Lord. Also, all of those disclaimers came AFTER they got exposed. The “fun novelty product” part especially was explicitly added in the last week

    • @BigJay039
      @BigJay039 Рік тому +88

      Yup. I saw a few UA-camrs make the legal claim, including that it could be used on government documents.

    • @ParodyWhitney
      @ParodyWhitney Рік тому +2

      Exactly!

    • @ParodyWhitney
      @ParodyWhitney Рік тому +2

      @@BigJay039I did too

    • @davidrich27
      @davidrich27 Рік тому +12

      I guess they mislead people somewhat. But did anything really think this was anything other than a gag gift? That seemed pretty clear through the advertising to me.

    • @tihomirrasperic
      @tihomirrasperic Рік тому +11

      it is a bigger problem if such a "Lord" comes to a country that is a monarchy
      Claiming a title you don't actually have is playing with own life, if the locals get offended and think you're humiliating them because you called yourself Lord
      the consequences can be very painful for such a "false lord"

  • @naolmstead
    @naolmstead Рік тому +287

    I remember once as a kid my dad telling me about a novelty plot a land on the Jack Daniel's distillery property he had. And he explained he didn't really own the land and that it was all just for fun, so I knew from the start what the Established Titles thing was. As I recall the Jack Daniel's one got him a calendar and a funny newsletter about the happenings on his plot that year such as a tree falling on it or a family of raccoons moving in near by.

    • @daemonspudguy
      @daemonspudguy Рік тому +49

      So technically it was something, and therefore is a better use of money than Established Titles.

    • @m0L3ify
      @m0L3ify Рік тому +40

      That actually sounds like a fun one

    • @Kimberly_Sparkles
      @Kimberly_Sparkles Рік тому +16

      I feel like people are really being dumb here. Did you really think you could buy a title for $50 bucks? Sensibly, it doesn't sound likely.
      I've actually looked at the purchase before a few years ago for a friend who would have thought it was a hoot. The fine print on the actual purchase is pretty clear that this is essentially a donation to support the tree planting charity they are pulling the land information from. Unless they've changed everything when you go to make the purchase, it's pretty clear what you are actually getting during the transaction. No one would think they have a legitimate title when the document saying you are a Laird or Lady says you aren't actually.

    • @-oiiio-3993
      @-oiiio-3993 Рік тому +14

      Your memories are accurate.
      My dad was also a Jack Daniels 'Squire'. It's not hereditary, I checked.

    • @snowangelnc
      @snowangelnc Рік тому +8

      @@daemonspudguy With Jack Daniel's he got a calendar and a funny newsletter. With Established Titles there's a tree planted and a funny certificate. Sure, you can have a preference, but you can't say that one is objectively better than the other.

  • @kaileymo
    @kaileymo 10 місяців тому +6

    I assumed it was obvious it’s just a novelty gift. The “I wanted to get you something that wasn’t just more stuff, but was more than a card” gift. It sucks that they’re lying though.

  • @surfercr3339
    @surfercr3339 Рік тому +11

    That last segment transformation to Coffeezilla was EPIC! Hahaha! I loved it!

  • @absolvitor3541
    @absolvitor3541 Рік тому +1117

    I'm a Scottish Advocate and, apart from wincing when you referred to the English legal system in the context of Scots law (they're very separate, very distinct and it's almost certain to rile any Scots lawyer), this was a genuinely excellent video. The issue of souvenir plots comes around several times a year, and especially around Christmas. The companies themselves are generally much more careful in how they word things than those they get to sponsor them. The only way to officially become a Lord or a Lady is by Letters Patent from His Majesty The King (and even then, it's more complex than that because of the various ranks of peerage that exist). Laird is still widely used in Scotland, but does only apply to those who own large and historic Scottish estates. My own personal view is that these companies taint whatever good work that they do with these gimmicks.

    • @aff77141
      @aff77141 Рік тому +34

      Pretty sure since so many customers are Americans any lawsuits would be done under American law, and ET itself was from what I can tell established in hong kong so who knows how that will go, but Scottish law may not even be involved other than who's legally a laird

    • @kylethomas9130
      @kylethomas9130 Рік тому +14

      Assuming they're doing any good with a portion of their proceeds, can't say being misleading about the lordship makes them sound dedicated to conservation efforts.

    • @paladro
      @paladro Рік тому +9

      at least he didn't call you Scotch ))

    • @ewanrae7893
      @ewanrae7893 Рік тому +20

      @@aff77141 Scots and English law student here, it’s ultimately a private international law issue. I think claims could be brought in American courts with jurisdiction to do so but they may apply Scots law (lex loci rei sitae) relating to the transfer of corporeal immoveable property (land) and the incorporeal hereditaments (titles) accruing from them.

    • @MrEiniweini
      @MrEiniweini Рік тому +26

      Fun stuff. I had a girlfriend buy me a "Coat of Arms", not knowing that if you produced one as a commoner after 1400AD you would be executed. What I have is something with two pigs on a blue field. Both of my fathers brothers were cops, pigs in blue is a talking point.

  • @Gwx480
    @Gwx480 Рік тому +1490

    Thank you! As a person from Scotland, I wish people would pay more attention to many fantastic conservation charities we have instead of giving their money to companies that sell fake titles. They do very little actual good apart from keeping the land undeveloped. People wishing to help with conservation should give to charities involved with habitat preservation and restoration.

    • @JeremiahDouglas
      @JeremiahDouglas Рік тому +4

      Nah they are all scams

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 Рік тому +4

      They plant trees on the land you buy apprently

    • @monhi64
      @monhi64 Рік тому +80

      You’re getting at the single fact that made me most angry in the entire video but no one has talked about. ET only even owned 200 ACRES of land to potentially preserve, which is such a painfully small amount of land to “preserve” makes me genuinely angry. That’s how math works tho, you sell land a square foot at a time you can fit damn near an infinite amount in 200 acres. Why were they even selling in square feet in the first place, Scotland uses metric

    • @DrDOOM-xs8jm
      @DrDOOM-xs8jm Рік тому +19

      @@melody3741 not really

    • @binbows2258
      @binbows2258 Рік тому +1

      @@monhi64 its because they are selling it to Americans

  • @kris8606
    @kris8606 10 місяців тому +5

    I bought one of these for my dad as a silly little gift since he loves trees and already has a reagle sounding name (x y the third) so even though it was most def a scam, it made my dad smile
    adding on that I only kept the monthly subscription for about three months.

  • @lilsprugga
    @lilsprugga 10 місяців тому +4

    I like the idea. They used to advertised that you change your first name to Lord or Lady. But in Australia, some states won't let you do that. Alas.

  • @leokastenberg800
    @leokastenberg800 Рік тому +330

    I saw a lot of those sponsorships, and I had no idea it cost that much. I assumed it was basically just a piece of paper you would print out after donating a few bucks to a conservation charity

    • @therabbithat
      @therabbithat Рік тому

      Ha! Similarly, I thought it was MORE of a scam than it is, I assumed when I saw it that they owned zero land in Scotland, kept 100% of your money, and never used (or payed forward) any money to plant trees.
      What it actually is:
      - take money off people who can afford it for a luxury item that they feel happy to own and will probably never realize they don't actually own. 130 dollars per person adding up to millions without anyone not being able to afford food / shelter / clothes / medicine because of it
      - redistribute this money into your own pocket and some youtubers
      - plant a few trees, not as many as you could or should, but certainly some.
      - make it very clear in the small print what you are actually doing
      This is actually awesome
      we never should have blown the lid off this

    • @thechickenwizard8172
      @thechickenwizard8172 Рік тому +22

      Yeah, after seeing those prices, there's no way that anyone with the preconceived notion that this is a silly "gag gift" would ever buy this

    • @whatisthat7874
      @whatisthat7874 Рік тому +1

      exactly, similar to 4ocean (though they are more legitimate than this), the price of "printing " a piece of paper and frame cost nearly $100, it's almost silly.

    • @haukenot3345
      @haukenot3345 Рік тому +1

      I was pondering getting this as a gag gift for a friend who likes to travel to Scotland. It was obvious to me that this was a novelty gift, but the same way you might gift someone an animal partnership at a local zoo or some other creative form of donation receipt, I thought that these lordship certificates were a fun idea if the money actually went to nature conservation. I decided against it after seeing the prices listed and realizing the intransparencies concerning charitable benefit vs. corporate profits. I personally don't mind the tongue-in-cheek attitute towards titles. What makes this unethical in my book is the (seemingly) false pretence of charitable intentions.

  • @Sharkey1208
    @Sharkey1208 Рік тому +410

    This kind of scam pops up every now and then under a different guise. From "Lordships" in other countries to "buying" stars and having them named after you or a loved one

    • @salazam
      @salazam Рік тому +53

      Are you saying I don't actually own a plot of moonland?

    • @vasilebandila2502
      @vasilebandila2502 Рік тому +11

      i would like a supernova please :)

    • @Skittenmeow
      @Skittenmeow Рік тому +10

      Yeah when I found out my neice got given a star named for her 21st I was sure it was a scam. Such a token gift, and bad idea for someone planning to be an astrophysicist. She knew it was a scam straight away.

    • @mhenderson7673
      @mhenderson7673 Рік тому +2

      @@Skittenmeow Haha that's like how all Scottish people can immediately tell Established Titles is a scam

    • @kaelandin
      @kaelandin Рік тому +5

      @@Skittenmeow My mother got me this, and the document had the location of the star and what do you know... There's no star where the coordinates indicate.

  • @jensbart
    @jensbart 11 місяців тому +5

    as someone who lives in the UK i've always found these companies super weird, inherited titles/granted titles are super weird and the idea of buying one/becoming a peer of the realm through is just... bonkers

  • @rhcp9009
    @rhcp9009 8 місяців тому +2

    The funniest part about all of this is that people actually looked into this. Once I saw these ads I thought it was consensual between both parties that one of those parties was okay with flushing their money down a toilet.

  • @Tetrumo
    @Tetrumo Рік тому +1524

    People need to understand that not every youtuber sponsoring a product is anymore immune to scams than themselves, in either believing the lies or the temptation of greed. As always, everyone should exercise a healthy dose of skepticism, when viewing any sponsorship, or anything for that matter.

    • @cymond
      @cymond Рік тому +66

      Yeah, but it certainly erodes trust in these "influencers" that they will promote something without doing a 5 minute Google search

    • @Tetrumo
      @Tetrumo Рік тому +3

      @@cymond true

    • @NestedQuantifier
      @NestedQuantifier Рік тому +68

      @@cymond Because a 5 min google search will definitely be able to tell you you are being scammed? Especially when everyone is already doing these kind of sponsorships and there are false info everywhere?

    • @ereder1476
      @ereder1476 Рік тому +28

      if you are taking 5 figures for your sponsorship, i'm sorry but you have no right to claim you didn't know as an excuse

    • @someone8323
      @someone8323 Рік тому

      I know it’s off topic but your English is dope

  • @aceofspades3018
    @aceofspades3018 Рік тому +910

    A couple months ago my dad was talking about he got a gift that he received a 1 foot of land in Scotland and is now a lord. So I can tell you in fact that what was advertised and conveyed. He even had a trip to Scotland planned and wanted to visit "his foot of land". After watching all of this I don't have the heart to tell him it was all false. I hope they do get sued.

    • @Imps603
      @Imps603 Рік тому +163

      just tell your dad. save him a trip to scotland. or like, have him take a vacation there or whatever

    • @markjohansen6048
      @markjohansen6048 Рік тому +85

      I don't know. If he showed up at Established Titles land, would they take him to his one square foot and let him stand on it and ... I don't know what he'd do after that. He presumably doesn't think he's going to build a castle on one square foot.

    • @penname8441
      @penname8441 Рік тому +4

      +

    • @private755
      @private755 Рік тому +112

      Uh tell him before he wastes his money on a flight lol that’s cruel of you to keep it from him. “Protecting” someone from their own emotions that you can’t even predict in the first place is manipulative as hell. He’s an adult who deserves to know he got ripped off.

    • @alyssarichardson2544
      @alyssarichardson2544 Рік тому +42

      @@private755 I second this. Tell your dad dude, he doesn't deserve to get ripped off like that.

  • @TalmidAndy
    @TalmidAndy Рік тому +4

    I find it interesting that most people who try to expose this scam skirt around the laws regarding use of such titles in many jurisdictions. Under both English and Scottish law you cannot just change your name to that of a title nor can you assume the title without significant legal problems.

  • @MarkSmith-xs4dz
    @MarkSmith-xs4dz Рік тому +74

    So as a real scottish heratige person, if I were to get officially recognized as a lord, then I'm going to start a competitor that adopts people so they can inherit my titles, which seems to me a more authentic approach to convey title that is legit. But for this honor I wouild charge an annual fee to keep the paperwork safe and available for legal purposes.

    • @ellotheregovna401
      @ellotheregovna401 Рік тому +8

      Intriguing…probably illegal somehow, but still a good idea

    • @GenkiGanbare
      @GenkiGanbare 11 місяців тому +6

      @@ellotheregovna401 If it's illegal then it is a racket as old as feudalism.

    • @averysspookshowspectacular6205
      @averysspookshowspectacular6205 10 місяців тому +3

      And amazingly would be more moral than Established Titles.

    • @mlg_dog420
      @mlg_dog420 6 місяців тому +1

      scottish heritage person 💀💀

    • @jeltje50
      @jeltje50 4 місяці тому

      ​@@mlg_dog420aka they are American

  • @thethomascobbgroup5001
    @thethomascobbgroup5001 Рік тому +712

    When a company I've never heard of suddenly advertisers on almost every video I watch, I'm immediately suspicious.

    • @EvileDik
      @EvileDik Рік тому +5

      It pretty much seems to be a rule across the board, if its a YT sponsorship, it's a borderline scam. Just look a the overpriced tat that appears in YT sponsorships, Manscaped, $30 of commodity hair clippers for $200. Nord VPN, the most untrusted VPN in IT security circles, with multiple data leaks and breaches. Raid shadow legends, micro transaction hell P2W. Vessi , massively overpriced footwear. Honey, massive data slurp that invades every action you carry out in your browser. Glasswire, repackaged open-source software (and often functions that already exist in your OS anyway).

    • @GrouRocks
      @GrouRocks Рік тому +23

      Now I'm getting curious about how legit that Japanese knife company is

    • @owenliu9235
      @owenliu9235 Рік тому +80

      @@GrouRocks shadiversity did a great video on kamikoto knives (Search kamikoto knives scam on youtube). He found that the knives they make are made of cheap steel and are equivalent to supermarket giveaway knife despite being sold for hundreds of dollars.

    • @runnercomet9191
      @runnercomet9191 Рік тому +45

      @@GrouRocks it's marketing company from Hong Kong reselling 10$ cheap chinese knives for 200$ (1000$ on permanent 80% sale)

    • @christosdoesthings
      @christosdoesthings Рік тому +13

      Suddenly curious about NordVPN, since i actually used it in the past.

  • @Sadarsa
    @Sadarsa Рік тому +531

    Another thing to keep in mind is that they are probably planting seeds, not actual saplings. Saplings costs varey, but generally are around $15-$50. They certainly don't cost $1. Seeds however DO, and often don't take root. I have 1000's of tree seeds fall from my tree each season, and only maybe 4-5 take root each year.

    • @hefoxed
      @hefoxed Рік тому +37

      So he actually used the wrong number, the 2million number trees planted is from trees for the future who's average is 25 cents a tree, they have a breakdown of costs on their website and they're counting seeds, labour, and planting iirc.. this is an extremely good point thou, lot of people's trees are likely not growing to trees.

    • @rabidbigdog
      @rabidbigdog Рік тому +10

      I purchased one for $partner amusement via Battleship New Jersey's insert (great channel) and was thinking this can't be real, but I would be super pissed to discover they AREN'T actually planting trees. That itself would seem to be deceptive. If it turns out they aren't planting trees, I'll be demanding my money back and I guess the law will catch them up eventually.

    • @hefoxed
      @hefoxed Рік тому +20

      @@rabidbigdog they are giving full refunds, I don't think even have to give certificate back so could refund and donate directly to the organizations to plant so many more trees
      Even their Scottish land protection thing is sus, from what some people have found it was already protected land and only 55.7 acres

    • @jordan_izza_wolf
      @jordan_izza_wolf Рік тому +5

      To be honesy i would have dozens of trees but u mow over all the saplings whenever I do yard work. I should let some trees grow next year along the fence line though.

    • @TheRealScooterGuy
      @TheRealScooterGuy Рік тому +10

      Trees that are only an inch or two tall can be purchased in bulk at prices under a dollar each. These are more than just seeds -- call them seedlings -- but their survivability is not assured.

  • @thomaslawson9808
    @thomaslawson9808 Рік тому +6

    "We planted trees so we can scam people" is a pretty funny thing to say

  • @SendFoodz
    @SendFoodz 4 місяці тому +2

    6:09 this makes me want a video on ownership of purchased mp3/ downloaded video games/ Funimation digital copy code from DVDs now Funimation is merging with Crunchyroll and disappearing.
    This would be a HOMERUN of a topic right now, and it's super relevant with new video game ownership debates and also Funimation merger

  • @jaxflash7793
    @jaxflash7793 Рік тому +148

    Imagine in the middle of the video he goes “anyways this video is sponsored by established titles”

  • @lorisreality8681
    @lorisreality8681 Рік тому +665

    There was a group in my town that had people buying a brick toward construction of a new school in the town. People were paying $80 for a brick in the new schools construction and your name would be memorialized on the wall in the new school. Turns out they put a printed chart on the wall with like eight hundred and some odd people printed in tiny 10 point font 😂.

    • @looksirdroids9134
      @looksirdroids9134 Рік тому +34

      Which font?

    • @Yukanhayt-Mhenow
      @Yukanhayt-Mhenow Рік тому +4

      Lol

    • @gianlucazinarof8617
      @gianlucazinarof8617 Рік тому +56

      To be quite honest if you donate to a school just because you have been told that you will get to see your name written somewhere, you're not a very good person to begin with

    • @thisismagacountry1318
      @thisismagacountry1318 Рік тому +2

      ​@@looksirdroids9134Watch Sheldon's Fun With Fonts

    • @gianlucazinarof8617
      @gianlucazinarof8617 Рік тому +21

      @@TheFrenchmanCooks Yes, my bad, I was a bit too harsh in my last comment but what I meant was that the main reason you should be donating (to anything) is because you belive in the project you are funding and not because of some kind of "promised glory"

  • @Mamaharps
    @Mamaharps 10 місяців тому +2

    It was a nice gift for my brother’s 60th birthday, as our ancestors are from Scotland. Honestly, he knows that it’s just a novelty and isn’t headed to Scotland to claim his land, but he has a nice certificate in memory of turning 60.

    • @damien678
      @damien678 10 місяців тому +1

      Consider getting him a book on Scottish Gaelic next to learn some words in the language

    • @mnschoen
      @mnschoen 2 місяці тому

      "Our ancestors are from Scotland" Oh lord, you're one of those. You're American, your brother is American, your great-grand-parents are American. "Scot" is not a genetic classification.

  • @Adam-pt3cb
    @Adam-pt3cb Рік тому +6

    From what you’ve described it sounds a lot like they might be essentially operating a land bank. This has been found to fall within the remit of the FCA as a collective investment and I don’t know if they have the necessary permissions or note, but if not it’s very likely they’re breaking the law.

    • @DrDimwit
      @DrDimwit 11 місяців тому

      Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but I'm not sure it'd really fall under that either. Under a scam land banking scheme, the marks are sold a plot of land under fraudulent claims of future worth or without appropriate control of the plots etc. etc., but (as far as I understand it) they do, in fact, own the plots.
      In these scams, they simply are not selling land. That's the rub of the whole change in the law on souvenir plots that they misrepresent and I don't think is explained super well here: they legally cannot be registered with the land registry, and as such, no sale has taken place. Despite the claims/implications of these companies, this doesn't mean the sales fall under contract law *instead* of having to go through the land registry, it just means no transfer of ownership can take place and no land has actually been sold.
      [note: I'm not a lawyer, but I know a lecturer at a Scottish university who specialises in Scottish Land Law who has been blocked on twitter by most of these companies for pointing out that their interpretations are wrong. I have yet to see any Scots Law experts in the relevant fields agreeing with the claims of these companies]

  • @bvingerh
    @bvingerh Рік тому +705

    Got a certificate from Highland Titles a few years ago. They're pretty straightforward about them selling you titles: "We cannot sell you a title. We are simply acknowledging your right to use the title of Laird, Lord or Lady of Glencoe, which is trademarked by Highland Titles." So you effectively only buy the right to use a trademarked phrase that just so happens to contain the word 'lord'.
    Anyway, I bought the certificate as a gimmick and added some upsells to my cart too, just for the fun of it.

    • @TheGrumpy01
      @TheGrumpy01 Рік тому +63

      same. i "purchased" the little plot of land which i know i don't actually own, but I'm happy. Highland Titles are far better and more honest than "Established Titles".

    • @LodinxHijinxPickleball
      @LodinxHijinxPickleball Рік тому +74

      @@TheGrumpy01 I'm so confused. What is the fun in paying some corporation to call yourself something that has no actual legitimacy (beyond trademark)? You could just call yourself something else that isn't trademarked. Neither makes you a lord, so why is the one that enriches some C-Suite stranger the fun one?

    • @TheOneEyedMac
      @TheOneEyedMac Рік тому

      @@LodinxHijinxPickleball its a good conversation starter, plus, it looks good if you hang it on your wall, makes you feel like your worth something.

    • @LodinxHijinxPickleball
      @LodinxHijinxPickleball Рік тому +6

      @@TheOneEyedMac You're gunna make me cry.

    • @ivytepes
      @ivytepes Рік тому +10

      You also planted trees to help clean the air. Thank you for that.

  • @JordanIdk
    @JordanIdk Рік тому +512

    Basically they used the “it's just a prank bro” defence to being called out on a very obvious scam. Kinda proves that you can sell absolutely nothing with enough advertising.

    • @Girlywolf-tl4ju
      @Girlywolf-tl4ju Рік тому +8

      there is a product on amazon called nothing

    • @allhopeabandon7831
      @allhopeabandon7831 Рік тому

      I think that they were surprised that anyone is stupid enough to actually think that buying a couple square inches of land makes you a Lord or Lady in real life. You can name a star after yourself, you can buy land on the moon...this is the same, good natured, jokish type thing as those two. I guess they haven't encountered the average American DemocRAT, who is dumber than a box of rocks, and who has been following this grifter through all the 'This time Donald Drumpf is really, really, really goin' to jail...cuz I'm uh liar, err, lawyer' content which enabled him to amass a sizable subscribership from the Dumb-o-cRATs who hate peace and prosperity bc they are idiots.

    • @dmitritelvanni4068
      @dmitritelvanni4068 Рік тому

      Well... do they plant trees as they claim tho? If so It may as well just be a "carbon offset". I can forgive the sketchy tactics if they're planting trees.

    • @TheMistyBlueLounge
      @TheMistyBlueLounge Рік тому +1

      @@dmitritelvanni4068 Even the idea of planting a tree to improve the environment is a scam most of the time, because they plant a single type of tree that limits biodiversity and isn't actually beneficial to the environment like a diverse natural forest. There's some studies that show these mono-crop forests actually make carbon emission worse and may further degrade the land they're on. They look nice on postcards but very little actually lives in these environments because there's not enough variety in the resources available. For this same reason they're very vulnerable to disease or any kind of environmental disruption and wont survive for long term like a real forest does.
      You're better off getting into Permaculture if you care about environmental sustainability, not paying someone half way around the world to pretend to do something beneficial.

    • @dmitritelvanni4068
      @dmitritelvanni4068 Рік тому

      @@TheMistyBlueLounge that's a fair criticism. But overall It is the best move forward I promise you. It could be done better for certain, but trees, not windmills... that's what will save the planet. In fact I'd argue it's the only option... that and nuclear energy...

  • @yaoifangirl39
    @yaoifangirl39 10 місяців тому +2

    Man turned into Coffeezilla at the end 😂

  • @DarkFrozenDepths
    @DarkFrozenDepths 10 місяців тому +3

    I'm reminded of Billy Mitchel's claim to be "Gamer of the Century" when I saw this.
    And he's probably in some legal trouble over that too when you look into the entire thing between him and Twin Galaxies. He might even get others like Namco involved due to this.

  • @annalaird8353
    @annalaird8353 Рік тому +1533

    I was pretty outraged when some of my favourite UA-camrs started shilling this scam. Scotland has some pretty hotly contested land ownership issues and some company selling off the land for profit is pretty offensive. After inspecting the website myself as well I found no evidence of the conservation efforts being made. Are indigenous species being planted? How are they being managed? The partner company didn't have any information on this and I couldn't even find their activity in Scotland. The whole thing stinks.
    And yes, the irony of my last name is not lost on me. Haha.

    • @faramund9865
      @faramund9865 Рік тому +134

      I really dislike these 'tree planting' companies anyways. As you say, usually they plant non indigenous trees as they buy trees or seeds rather than collect it nearby.
      Furthermore often this is on land where trees have just been cut down.
      If you really want to do something for forests. All you have to do is buy the land and then let nature do the work for you.

    • @historyandhorseplaying7374
      @historyandhorseplaying7374 Рік тому +10

      @@faramund9865 What's wrong with planting trees where trees were just cut down?

    • @nootnoot42
      @nootnoot42 Рік тому +87

      @@historyandhorseplaying7374 Well if land is used for wood, it is normal to plant trees after cutting an area down. So it is basically selling business as usual as regrowing forests...
      It is as if you'd be claiming to gift your hair to charity while actually just having your hair cut and "gift" the cutoffs (which are not useable ;) ).

    • @Jehty_
      @Jehty_ Рік тому +41

      @@historyandhorseplaying7374 there is no problem with doing that.
      The problem is with collecting donations to do that or advertising it as a honorable thing.
      Generally whoever profited from cutting down the trees should plant new trees.
      They should pay for it. Not private people who were lured in by "saving the earth" promises.

    • @leroyjenkins1249
      @leroyjenkins1249 Рік тому +33

      I knew it was scame once a YTber mentioned how "easy" you could just become a Lady/Lord. I know this basically from my family. In a nutshell, my family has some rumors about having an ancestor that is the bastard of a small European dukedome. No bigshot, some really local family.
      As a kid, I got really fascinated with that idea, because -let's be real. We all know the stories of "suddenly a princess?" where one day it's revealed your life is much more special than you knew.
      Anyway. My Ma quickly shot me down. In the way that -even if I had evidence - the bureaucracy would be tedious and hellish. And in the end the biggest thing I potentially would have, would be a posh title that only looks good on certain applications.

  • @derinedala5032
    @derinedala5032 Рік тому +541

    Favourite part of this whole 'official title with land' gimmick is that according to Established Titles' "legal loophole" claim, all Scottish homeowners are "official" Lords and Ladies.

    • @israellai
      @israellai Рік тому +5

      Well, considering that to many Americans, Scotland is a fantasy land with woods and fairies and freedom fighters but no actual living people....

    • @Alondro77
      @Alondro77 Рік тому +2

      @@israellai Nah, Scotland is populated by Critical Drinker clones who spend their days guzzling enough booze to fill the Pacific.

    • @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus
      @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus Рік тому +3

      @@Alondro77mostly buckfast or whatever they got for goon bags there

    • @michaelutech4786
      @michaelutech4786 Рік тому +18

      In Italy, all you have to do to earn the academic title "Dotore" is to wear a suit in the coffee shop. Laird sounds cooler, but having coffee in Italy has its own charm.

    • @taln0reich
      @taln0reich Рік тому +8

      had the same thought and then made a google search as to how many scots do own their homes. According to google it was 62% of scotish households living in property they own. So, I'm not sure whether owning a flat in a multi-family home counts towards this supposed loophole, but if it does, the majority of scots would be Lords or Ladies, and if it doesn't, and if it doesn't it would still very definetly be a double digit percentage of the population. Also, just imagine how obnoxious dealing with landlords would be if just about every landlord could demand being referred to as Lord or Lady.

  • @peterhansen5804
    @peterhansen5804 Рік тому +8

    The Estabished Titles scam reminds me of when you could buy a plot on the moon or could name a star - for a fee, of course :-)

  • @Chad_Losey
    @Chad_Losey 7 місяців тому +1

    It's hardly a novelty when you get nothing in return. Unless you view the certificate as a really expensive printing service...

  • @ultimateninjaboi
    @ultimateninjaboi Рік тому +367

    Glad to see you addressing the whole "people who fell for this are idiots and the problem," mindset. Its so frustrating to see it come up every time a major scam is discussed. Cuz it basically shifts blame away from the actual bad actors, in favor of victim-blaming. And usually for the sake of inflating the persons own ego.

    • @heathencaerus4046
      @heathencaerus4046 Рік тому +25

      I never bought it, but I was considering it... I have never in my life heard the term 'gag gift'... I did not even know that people buy fake gifts on purpose. Thus I was very gullible when I saw some of my favorite UA-camrs advertise this as a nice gift for your friends.

    • @MisterDimi
      @MisterDimi Рік тому +7

      ​@@heathencaerus4046 Yeah, I too was considering it. I like to spend my money on weird and silly stuff, and when I saw someone advertising it I went like "oh, this is so funny, I'll probably get it someday", the thought of it being a gag gift never even crossed my mind lol

    • @DM-zh2kt
      @DM-zh2kt Рік тому +14

      True. Especially for the part of "inflating the persons own ego", I can't recall reading a single comment where the person say that is the buyer fault without also stating "I would never do that" in some way. The most common being "It was so obvious" argument.

    • @honeyreyes4384
      @honeyreyes4384 Рік тому +10

      Not much to add but support for this comment. The internet gets so high and mighty about spotting scams and it’s victim blaming, sadly diverting where the true focus/disgust/judgement should be from the scammers to the consumers. It’s messed up.

    • @pyropulseIXXI
      @pyropulseIXXI Рік тому +13

      The only id**ts are the people that knew it was a 'gag gift' and still bought it. They went "Yeah, I'll spend $50 on a pdf file that is literally worthless. Totally worth it!"

  • @davidrichards9528
    @davidrichards9528 Рік тому +951

    Their website was edited to say it’s “a fun gift, meant for a good laugh” after Scott made his videos calling them out 😂

  • @wowRichtoad
    @wowRichtoad 9 місяців тому +2

    As a general rule, if it's too good to be true, it usually is and this definitely applies. Especially when you consider that the whole point of nobility is to exclude the rabble.