Generalized linear consumption function | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
- Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacadem...
Generalizing a linear consumption function as a function of aggregate income
Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacadem...
Macroeconomics on Khan Academy: Topics covered in a traditional college level introductory macroeconomics course
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy's Macroeconomics channel: / channel
Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...
Mr. Khan. You are always there for me when my professors don't explain something thoroughly enough. I would thank you in person, but I don't think I could handle the voice of god face-to-face.
thank you for these videos !!!! my current professor does nothing! "read this chapter, go to aplia and do your homework!" online class is B.S. i would fail if not for this and i made the deans list last semester. thinking about transferring to a new school because of this experience.
me: captain jacksparrow what do you say
jack: 11:08
At time 10:38, why you have assume Co-c1T as a constant? When you have zero income you are not going to pay any taxes and when you have variable income the taxes amount will change so does C1T component !
In economics, either the person will make a loan because taxes are payable nontheless or they will sell their assets for that income to occur. Depending on the laws of that particular country, the revenue services(taxmen) will seize those assets themselves. Its only in the case, I believe when someone is within the poverty line where they are not taxed but again, its dependent on that country's laws. Hoped it helped! Remember Economics is an assumption and study based on models of the activities in the economy and its outcomes. So it is also assumed that even if there's no income, taxes must still be paid.
I love these videos.
awesome professor khan you are great👏👏👌✌
Income taxes are a function of individual income. Y is aggregate income.
Nice
why is tax constant here?
Why don't we subtract as well autonomous income from aggregate income to find the disposable income?
Consumption function for Margaret Thatcher's poll tax.
make a vid on how to make your momory better....mines crap
Hi I have a doubt, how can Marginal propensity to consume *taxes ie C1 *T is constant, because as income increases , our tax amount increases(even if tax rate is constant ) and hence that portion(that you are calling constant ) would increase right ?
Khan Academy, you're talking nonsense.
At 3:24 you have the equation:
C = Co + c1 (Disposable income)
C = Co + c1 Yd
where you say c1 is the marginal propensity to consume [mpc].
That's nonsense.
The marginal propensity to consume, uses INCREMENTS of consumption and disposable income:
ΔC/ΔYd = mpc
ΔC = mpc ΔYd
It's the average propensity to consume, that uses consumption and disposable income:
C/Yd = apc
C = apc Yd
Your consumption function does NOT use increments, it uses consumption and disposable income:
C = apc Yd
C = Co + c1 Yd
therefore c1 is the AVERAGE propensity to consume: C/Yd
C = Co + c1 Yd
C = Co + (C/Yd) Yd
C = Co + C
0 = Co
Your consumption function actually says:
C = C
and Co must equal zero.
Anybody knows that the MARGINAL propensity to consume
applies to an increment of disposable income: ΔYd
NOT to disposable income: Yd
i completely agree with nilsor1337
Your trying to complicate an already complicated equation. Why?