Generalized linear consumption function | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @beawulf9
    @beawulf9 11 років тому +19

    Mr. Khan. You are always there for me when my professors don't explain something thoroughly enough. I would thank you in person, but I don't think I could handle the voice of god face-to-face.

  • @montytanner966
    @montytanner966 9 років тому +10

    thank you for these videos !!!! my current professor does nothing! "read this chapter, go to aplia and do your homework!" online class is B.S. i would fail if not for this and i made the deans list last semester. thinking about transferring to a new school because of this experience.

  • @shivadevkota602
    @shivadevkota602 3 роки тому +2

    At time 10:38, why you have assume Co-c1T as a constant? When you have zero income you are not going to pay any taxes and when you have variable income the taxes amount will change so does C1T component !

    • @princeemo4800
      @princeemo4800 3 роки тому

      In economics, either the person will make a loan because taxes are payable nontheless or they will sell their assets for that income to occur. Depending on the laws of that particular country, the revenue services(taxmen) will seize those assets themselves. Its only in the case, I believe when someone is within the poverty line where they are not taxed but again, its dependent on that country's laws. Hoped it helped! Remember Economics is an assumption and study based on models of the activities in the economy and its outcomes. So it is also assumed that even if there's no income, taxes must still be paid.

  • @yuvrajbhandari3993
    @yuvrajbhandari3993 4 роки тому +4

    me: captain jacksparrow what do you say
    jack: 11:08

  • @iam774526
    @iam774526 10 років тому +3

    why is tax constant here?

  • @redioactiv
    @redioactiv 2 роки тому

    Why don't we subtract as well autonomous income from aggregate income to find the disposable income?

  • @oldJimmyWales
    @oldJimmyWales 12 років тому +1

    Income taxes are a function of individual income. Y is aggregate income.

  • @zebaali2529
    @zebaali2529 2 роки тому

    Hi I have a doubt, how can Marginal propensity to consume *taxes ie C1 *T is constant, because as income increases , our tax amount increases(even if tax rate is constant ) and hence that portion(that you are calling constant ) would increase right ?

  • @Darius1295
    @Darius1295 10 років тому +1

    Consumption function for Margaret Thatcher's poll tax.

  • @kevalvichare4759
    @kevalvichare4759 7 років тому

    awesome professor khan you are great👏👏👌✌

  • @01username001
    @01username001 12 років тому

    I love these videos.

  • @bhavyadhingra2997
    @bhavyadhingra2997 7 років тому

    Nice

  • @iPhone3GSCase
    @iPhone3GSCase 12 років тому

    make a vid on how to make your momory better....mines crap

  • @MrTugwit
    @MrTugwit 7 років тому +1

    Khan Academy, you're talking nonsense.
    At 3:24 you have the equation:
    C = Co + c1 (Disposable income)
    C = Co + c1 Yd
    where you say c1 is the marginal propensity to consume [mpc].
    That's nonsense.
    The marginal propensity to consume, uses INCREMENTS of consumption and disposable income:
    ΔC/ΔYd = mpc
    ΔC = mpc ΔYd
    It's the average propensity to consume, that uses consumption and disposable income:
    C/Yd = apc
    C = apc Yd
    Your consumption function does NOT use increments, it uses consumption and disposable income:
    C = apc Yd
    C = Co + c1 Yd
    therefore c1 is the AVERAGE propensity to consume: C/Yd
    C = Co + c1 Yd
    C = Co + (C/Yd) Yd
    C = Co + C
    0 = Co
    Your consumption function actually says:
    C = C
    and Co must equal zero.
    Anybody knows that the MARGINAL propensity to consume
    applies to an increment of disposable income: ΔYd
    NOT to disposable income: Yd

  • @ibrahim9296
    @ibrahim9296 12 років тому

    i completely agree with nilsor1337

  • @2leet2cheet
    @2leet2cheet 12 років тому

    Your trying to complicate an already complicated equation. Why?