The MPC, the MPS and the Keynesian spending multiplier

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @mahiniqbalchowdhury6032
    @mahiniqbalchowdhury6032 6 років тому +21

    This was the best explanation of these topics I've ever heard. Thanks from Bangladesh.

  • @cnemenzo1122
    @cnemenzo1122 Місяць тому +1

    Thank you so much! This the most simple, detailed and cleaner video I have seen so far. The words you are using are easy to understand. ❤👍🏼🙌🏼

  • @SebiPoet
    @SebiPoet 3 роки тому +3

    yo this is hands down the clearest video I found on this, I gotta quiz tomorrow and this is godsend.

    • @xWilled
      @xWilled 8 місяців тому

      How's the quiz go

  • @ifnocanheiniken
    @ifnocanheiniken 5 років тому +4

    Thank you for clearing that cloud of confusion I had. Great video 👍🏽

  • @ethancbaker2002
    @ethancbaker2002 2 роки тому +2

    So if the mpc increase so does the Keynesian Spending Multiplier????

  • @weatherman40
    @weatherman40 4 роки тому +1

    and in 10 minutes I got it all well ..thanks for making me understand the multiplier and what it means

    • @emypatrickm.7602
      @emypatrickm.7602 2 роки тому

      I want a help to this question am still a student: (A given country has an investment expenditure rising from $125m to $160m, and it's MPS is 40%. Calculate the final change in an economy)
      I really need the answer of this

  • @dantheman4011
    @dantheman4011 5 років тому +2

    Doesnt saving cause GDP to expand with a multiplier, or does it only cause Money supply to increase? Banks increase money in circulation which therefore increases GDP I would assume?

  • @babitasalam8949
    @babitasalam8949 5 років тому +2

    This is the best explanation!👍Thank you .

  • @lindacarlen6250
    @lindacarlen6250 5 років тому +2

    Finally I got it! THANKS👍👍👍

  • @mymoodsetter
    @mymoodsetter 4 роки тому

    Looks really simple in this video than reading about it. Thanks a lot.

  • @wuutchillll
    @wuutchillll 4 роки тому +1

    I love the explanation!! thankyou soo much! now I understand more. God Bless!

  • @sandyexantus1179
    @sandyexantus1179 3 роки тому

    thank you so much for this, it was well explained, better than my professor

  • @emypatrickm.7602
    @emypatrickm.7602 2 роки тому

    I want a help to this question am still a student: (A given country has an investment expenditure rising from $125m to $160m, and it's MPS is 40%. Calculate the final change in an economy)
    I really need the answer of this

  • @yildiz6720
    @yildiz6720 5 років тому +2

    This video helped me alooooot
    Thankssss🙏🏻

  • @hariduttpanta4616
    @hariduttpanta4616 4 роки тому +1

    Thans a lot for your clear explanation easily.

  • @keitho35
    @keitho35 5 років тому +1

    Great video thank you for uploading

  • @yasmintinwala6463
    @yasmintinwala6463 8 місяців тому

    Thank you Jason for this

  • @greypersona4771
    @greypersona4771 6 місяців тому

    thank you, this was very clear 🙏🏼

  • @MyteeBumbleBee
    @MyteeBumbleBee 3 роки тому +2

    Your presentation was like a breath of fresh air amongst so many confusing, self-serving videos! My question to you is: how would you calculate the consumption value for the $1,100 income if you only had the initial $700 consumption from which to start work?

    • @emypatrickm.7602
      @emypatrickm.7602 2 роки тому

      I want a help to this question am still a student: (A given country has an investment expenditure rising from $125m to $160m, and it's MPS is 40%. Calculate the final change in an economy)
      I really need the answer of this

  • @MamoonaIqbal-lb3vi
    @MamoonaIqbal-lb3vi 2 роки тому

    thank you sooooo much its very helpfuland easy
    to understand

  • @tatyanagrossett8002
    @tatyanagrossett8002 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you man!!

  • @josesitocastorena341
    @josesitocastorena341 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much, you really helped me a lot.

  • @realdvgarg
    @realdvgarg 3 роки тому

    but if we're finding 'k' using the MPS, shouldn't we do [1/(MPS + MPT + MPM)]?

    • @Nealknowsnumbers
      @Nealknowsnumbers Рік тому

      I think this is a simplified version. But yes, that is correct.

    • @realdvgarg
      @realdvgarg Рік тому

      @@Nealknowsnumbers

  • @studyiaswithvikashranjan8456
    @studyiaswithvikashranjan8456 3 роки тому

    Good difination sir🙏🙏👍👍

  • @arien_afrina3073
    @arien_afrina3073 5 років тому +1

    thankyouu so much , very helpful 👍

  • @aliuzair2706
    @aliuzair2706 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks alot

  • @allysttms
    @allysttms 11 місяців тому

    you are my savior

  • @kiky.mp4
    @kiky.mp4 3 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @neugabi
    @neugabi 3 роки тому

    You are the best

  • @klam77
    @klam77 4 роки тому +2

    Why do you ignore the Business sector in this analysis? For example, they always tell us the economy is three parts: Y=C+I+G. So you cover the "C" in this video but miss the business savings, ie "profits", no? Companies "spend" on cost of goods sold which come from still other companies and so on and so forth and each company "saves" it's profits....so the profit rate is also like MPS, and your analysis completely IGNORES this, no?

    • @learnecon1539
      @learnecon1539 4 роки тому +2

      What is saved in financial institutions comes back to the simple model in form of an injection (investment) which is made by the private sector depending on the consumption behavior (MPC) of an economy.

  • @YouCanStartLateAndFinish
    @YouCanStartLateAndFinish 3 роки тому

    Omg thank you so much

  • @Charlie-hp2oh
    @Charlie-hp2oh Рік тому

    TOP

  • @nahumkemunto1003
    @nahumkemunto1003 Рік тому

  • @NALWANIKASamalie
    @NALWANIKASamalie 7 місяців тому

    Hmm

  • @veranyambura3194
    @veranyambura3194 Рік тому

    You are the best mwalimu🥹

  • @babitasalam8949
    @babitasalam8949 5 років тому +4

    This is the best explanation!👍Thank you .