The 4th Dimension Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
  • #4thdimension #4d #dimensions #space #time #explained #science #sciencefacts #spacetime #relativity
    Is 4th dimension real? What even is 4th dimension? Can we see in 4D? In this video I explained 4th dimension and most common concepts that would let us understand it. Other than additional dimension, we could also consider parallel universes, alternate timelines and multiverse theory as 4D. Connections between space, time and gravity may suggest that the 4th dimension is closer to us than we think. General relativity and quantum physic may some day turn theories into reality.
    Subscribe and like for more videos about technology, science and memes from an engineer's point of view.
    0:00 Intro
    0:20 Establishing some things
    1:42 Next dimension
    5:03 Parallel universes
    6:14 Gravity
    7:53 Time
    9:32 Additional questions
    10:25 Closing thoughts
    _________________
    Blender models:
    Spongebob's Bedroom by Yanez Designs
    sketchfab.com/3d-models/spong...
    Casting couch by Sashka_Shekhirow
    open3dlab.com/project/35025/
    Amongus by Framed51
    sketchfab.com/3d-models/among...
    ________
    Music:
    Intro and outro - LEMMiNO - Cipher
    • LEMMiNO - Cipher (BGM)
    Atoms. They always make things up. Am I right?
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @romanjanek5283
    @romanjanek5283 3 місяці тому +7

    EM Field is shaped as 4D sphere, everything with charge creates EM field. So 4D imprint/behavior in our 3D is everywhere nonstop, interacting, stable and obeying same laws as everything. A bit mind bending topic

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  3 місяці тому +5

      It is quite fascinating how many phenomena seem to be connected on some deeper level. It makes me wonder what new things humanity will discover in the future.

    • @aluisious
      @aluisious Місяць тому

      @@AzurePrint It won't matter unless we can discover we shouldn't torch our own home.

  • @zanis4444
    @zanis4444 23 дні тому +3

    10 thousand views + talking about such an interesting topic with only 245 subscribers, how?? You deserve so many more

  • @aarondavis8943
    @aarondavis8943 3 місяці тому +6

    It's interesting that the tesseract contains 8 cubes: The internal, external, and the 6 that join between the inner and outer cubes.

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  3 місяці тому +2

      That's how it looks to us. In theory, there are no internal or external cubes, because all cubes are the same size. They are connected in the 4th direction, but we can't see it.

  • @GonzoRTO
    @GonzoRTO 13 днів тому +1

    This channel will get bigger in no time 🎉

  • @petersamu8248
    @petersamu8248 8 днів тому

    That blue amogus looked really sus to me. The way he moved was beyond "cursed".🤣

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  8 днів тому +1

      He is a higher being. We cannot comprehend the sussy way he operates.

  • @hannahclapham5280
    @hannahclapham5280 3 місяці тому +2

    I really enjoyed your different interpretations of the 4th dimension, as mam would say "you're a good egg"

  • @amirbest1318
    @amirbest1318 3 місяці тому +7

    i dont know whats harder to comprehend
    the fourth dimension
    or
    how you've only got less than 50 subscribers

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  3 місяці тому

      We can only guess 🤔

  • @musicanayop
    @musicanayop 3 місяці тому +3

    Very nice explaination

  • @VolumetricTerrain-hz7ci
    @VolumetricTerrain-hz7ci 3 місяці тому +2

    Awesome video!
    Here's a youtube video title I will share to you all.
    The title is:
    "Is there a dimension between third and fourth?"
    Feel free to share it with other.
    :-)

  • @halfniak
    @halfniak 11 днів тому

    The sentence at 2:05. That's all you need to know really.

  • @aluisious
    @aluisious Місяць тому +1

    Every dimension is a holographic projection on its boundary in the lower dimension. Or that's what people who are better at math than I am tell me.

  • @heatherbelanger5466
    @heatherbelanger5466 27 днів тому +1

    How I like to images a 4 dimensional object is Imagine a 2d space beside a 3d space and then make make the 2d space 1 dimension bigger and the 3d space gets bigger with it

    • @halfniak
      @halfniak 11 днів тому

      yes just like that, except i can't imagine the 3d going to 4d.

  • @Rekunance
    @Rekunance 3 дні тому

    I think gaining Enlightenment like the Buddha will allow you to access the higher dimensions and up. I got Enlightenment last May 2024 and I think I now know why Buddha was so ahead of his time where even Einstein was amazed by Buddhism

  • @swampgod8244
    @swampgod8244 3 місяці тому +5

    TO A 4D BEING OBSERVING A 3D CUBE TO ITS PERSPECTIVE ITS OBSERVING A 0D CUBE. BASICALLY TO A 4D BEING WE ARE THE DOT

  • @jean-francoiskener6036
    @jean-francoiskener6036 25 днів тому

    I can visualize 4D and 5D. 0D is a point, 1D a line, 2D a plane and 3D a cube. Therefore, you duplicate and displace the vertex to create a new dimension, easily visualizable. Intuitively, 4D is time and 5D multiple timelines, possibly with different beginnings or laws. 6D is just more timelines. If you keep increasing dimensions, you remove degrees of freedom of the equation, and the maximum dimension represents the universe as a static picture, where every possible succession of events is represented. It's obvious to me. Time is not a lie, it's just incomplete to see it as where everything ends.

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  25 днів тому +1

      How is 6D different from 5D in this case? If it is just more timelines, it is still 5D. Also, if you understand how a 0D point to a 3D cube analogy works, then how does 4D being time fit there?

  • @DougMarv
    @DougMarv 10 днів тому

    Did the engagement 👍💪

  • @joedoe3688
    @joedoe3688 3 місяці тому +2

    good job!

  • @brianbavington5344
    @brianbavington5344 Місяць тому

    wouldn't a good articulation be if 3DXinfanite is like frames of a film 4D can see the entire film spread out but to us we are living the movie 1 frame at a time.

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  Місяць тому +1

      Yes, that is a good analogy.
      The question is, if you would go through those frames, would you see different points in time or entirely different realities?

    • @brianbavington5344
      @brianbavington5344 Місяць тому

      @@AzurePrint I am certainly no expert. I'm only an electrician. But with troubleshooting, I believe the next step would be to try to grasp the concept of seeing all the frames at once instead of one after another. Quantum physics and quantum entanglement is the buzzword right now. It's a little bit of a stretch, but that's kind of what time is. That's just my crazy little theory. So if time is nothing but a calculation of sorts. We just simply know it as a measurement for our lifespan. So if that's just a calculation then the multi-dimensions would be the laid out strips of film. I nerd out on this stuff. I love it

  • @kevincreed6715
    @kevincreed6715 2 місяці тому +1

    Try a 45 degree rotation instead of a 90 degree ; )

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  2 місяці тому

      That's 3D and a half of 4D

    • @kevincreed6715
      @kevincreed6715 2 місяці тому

      @@AzurePrint Emm so if the fourth dimension acts like a boundary then the missing 45 degrees would naturally revert back to the third dimention predicting a partical limit within the universe! Maybe?
      🙃

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  2 місяці тому +1

      In theory it doesn't matter if it is 45 or 90 degrees. What matter is where it is. In analogy to how you can expand from 2D to 3D, you should be able to go in a next, theoretical direction to expand to 4D. As in XYZ coordinate system, all axis are prependicular to each other. So the next coordinate should also be perpendicular to all previous ones.

    • @kevincreed6715
      @kevincreed6715 2 місяці тому

      ​@@AzurePrintHi Azure this is a great topic for a video so thanks for posting and replying too. To continue the thought form... its possible that the third dimension is perpendicular to its self and that is the fourth dimension what do you think does that describe tessellation? Thx you've prospered my thinking on the subject : )

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  2 місяці тому

      Yeah, same as 3D space can be described as infinite 2D spaces, stacked on each other in a 3rd perpendicular direction, the 4th dimension could be an infinite number of 3D spaces stacked in a 4th perpendicular (it has to be perpendicular to all previous directions at the same time) direction. It is kind of like tesselated tiles, but we can't see and comprehend how they are stacked, because we only know and understand our 3D world.

  • @DougMarv
    @DougMarv 10 днів тому

    You know what's crazy? It's exactly as I always believed angels to be and see, much before 4D being a thing.
    I also believe seeing in 4D would give us the vision of the spiritual world, as it existence proved to me been real, só I don't expect you to believe lol

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  10 днів тому

      If the 4th dimension even exist, then maybe. Spiritual stuff, soul, consciousness, all may just be a part of physics/science that we can't explain yet.

  • @INFINITESYKOSIS
    @INFINITESYKOSIS 18 днів тому +2

    u guys didnt master the higher dimensions yet 🙄

  • @JadeHelm_15
    @JadeHelm_15 Місяць тому

    Iykyk 😂

  • @marcelmolenaar5684
    @marcelmolenaar5684 Місяць тому +1

    4th dimension is time.

  • @mojakaunt6637
    @mojakaunt6637 Місяць тому

    4d is time

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 15 днів тому

    The 4th dimension is Time.

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 15 днів тому

      You cannot see time; you experience its passing.

  • @fy7589
    @fy7589 Місяць тому +1

    4th dimension is time. Everything else is just BS.

  • @Pair-O-Bulls
    @Pair-O-Bulls Місяць тому

    I get so tired of seeing this so called "tesseract" image of a cube inside another cube with the vertices connected by line segments.
    I understand it's merely intended as a visual representation for people to comprehend. But it gives a very inadequate conception. That form is quite clearly still a 3d object. Just the same as drawing a cube on a sheet of paper does not change it from being 2d object into a 3d object. We cannot understand a fourth spatial dimension anymore than the folks in flatland can understand a 3rd one. But we need to stop using this visual. Its not 4d

    • @AzurePrint
      @AzurePrint  Місяць тому +2

      Yes, it is a projection of 4D shape in 3D. We can't visualise a 4D object in our 3D reality, so we need some kind of simplification.