I did and I wanted to shoot myself from comprehending and mentally and physically visualizing the 4th dimension. Currently writing a book titled "How I Nearly Broke The Current Universe"
Just a suggestion: Turn on the Phase Reverse on your Preamp/ DAW for your microphone to eliminate the "underwater" out-of-phase sound, and turn your compressor to at least 4:1 to level out the constant change in distance from the mic. The presentation itself is good.
@@lackokalman Yeah we cancel out the background hum that would bother no one to completely mess up the voice of the speaker while adding weird underwater noises.
If it were true, your 'shadow' would invert itself inside out every time your real body rotated... I don't think most people sleep normally until they turn over and have all of their innards pop out and wrap around them! But those are still the right types of questions to ask
Ralsei, have you been to those “4D cinemas” if you haven’t, it’s basically 3D but your chair shakes and when there is like a water effect on screen, they will spray water on you
I read a book called Hyperspace by Michio Kaku once. There was a passage where someone proposed thinking of a cube, unfolding it into a 2d series of squares, making the squares into cubes and then refolding them into a cube as a means of picturing a hypercube. Also, I may be misinformed but I thought spacetime was a dimension.
@you tube Because he's making up theories - which is fine - and pretending that they relate to reality - which, unless that is proven, is not fine. In my humble opinion, anyway. I want proof, or at least very strong circumstantial evidence that can be demonstrated in repeatable and potentially-falsifiable experiment.
@@jonb6417 how tf are u supposed to prove that? its obviously all h theories cos we will never ever be able to prove the existence of other dimensions (why? we can’t even see them, our minds cannot even imagine how they look like)
This was by far the best explanation I’ve seen. So good that I scoured the internet to find it again. Now if you can just get me to understand 11 dimensions
@@Waerom1 Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. (Notice the associated black “space” of WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) WHAT IS E=MC2 is gravity. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. INDEED, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON ON BALANCE; AS it IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. LOOK at what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!(THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) Consider what is the ORANGE AND setting Sun. Magnificent. Notice that, ON BALANCE, the curvature or shape of WHAT IS THE MOON matches that of WHAT IS THE EARTH/GROUND. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is THE SUN along WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE (ON BALANCE). Magnificent. I have CLEARLY proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
I really like how you rotate the tesseract to show that all squares inside are the same size, that really gives me a better understanding of its nature
Here's fuel for thought: as 3D beings, we can fully perceive anything and everything on a 2D plane (as demonstrated by the circle-in-the-box scenario), however due to the lack of the third dimention, a (theoretical) 2D person would find it impossible to look "up" and see us, as we simply exist above their dimension. Taking this one step further - if a 4D person was to look at a 3D plane, they too would be able to perceive everything at once - you, the house you're in, the plumbing of the house, your organs digesting your last meal... anything. And the scary part is, as we exist on a 3D plane, we would be completely unable to look "out" to see these 4D people. They could exist, and be watching you read this, right now, but you wouldn't be able to tell. ;)
That's the kind of thoughts Lovecraft pleasured himself to on lonely nights. Also, if you ever encounter a color you've never seen before, don't go near it.
@@cb1671 Would you though? Go back to the example I gave about a 2D plane - how would a 2D human be able to look "up", and see us? They simply can't, as they're restricted in what they can see by the plane on which they exist. They could probably see our shadow, if we were to cast it over them, but that's about it. In terms of 3D observing 4D, I see no reason as to why we wouldn't be able to see the shadow of a 4D person, but we wouldn't be able to directly observe them.
It's interesting because we can't see 4D objects because we live in a 3D universe, however, hypothetically speaking, we could see the 3D shadows of 4D objects if we found some.
@@Loo_Kah no. The 4th dimensional cube that we all call "tesseract" is the equivalent of a glass box in our dimension. It is made for us to understand how cubes work on 4 dimensions. The real terrasact is a "closed" object in our perspective, we will still be able to see all it's sides but we will need to walk around the box to see it. However, as for 4d beings, they will be able to see it's "shadow" as a 3d object, but will still be able to see all it's sides even if they looked at it in one perspective. Basically, it's similar on how "glass" cubes are made for nursery students to understand how a box works, and how the shadow of a box works, we will be able to see all sides of it as a line at an upper perspective, but 2d beings will need to walk around to see all of it's sides. I hope your mind doesn't shut off simultaneously after reading this...
The idea of 4th dimension beings can see inside the box is not correct. If there's actually a fourth dimension then there could be another part of the box that we didn't know which could block the view to see the sphere.
Just discovering this video now, but it definitely helped me understand 4 dimensional space better. The revolving/rotating tesseract was most helpful! Thank you!
The 3D image of the moving tesserac really helped me understand things a lot better. It's like life blooms around you. You can open 3d objects up and around and back into themselves. Think flipping a doughnut inside out and back again.
You're explaining 4D to me In my 3D world On my 2D screen And I'm trying to understand with my 1D brain... and this comment is original in 0 dimensions.
Imagine the horror Mario felt, being controlled by someone to smash objects with his heads, and can only see lines along his way, the horror is giving me anxiety.
4:30 this part is one of the most useful visualizations I've ever seen. I don't know why they aren't showing the 4D shadows rotating like this in every video about the 4th dimension!
4D is time doesn't rly make sense every demension has time in it, being able to go in the past when you existed let's say exactly 10seconds and then you go in the future also exactly 10seconds does not make sense if you think about it like there should be a difference even so close to zero that could be considered negligible so well you didn't exist in that time. When we take 4d as time you existing in the past present and future doesn't really make sense since 4D is just 3D with more perpendicular lines or more planes that makes the 4D somewhat special so just so you know time is not 4D
@@rioksek8930 The way I see it, just because an object can only move on a 2D plane, does that magically mean the third dimension doesn’t exist for it? Of course not, just because you can’t observe something from one perspective doesn’t nullify it’s existence. And your example relies heavily on time TRAVEL, instead of what time is supposed to be: a measurement system. Just like length, width, and distance. Sound familiar? Let’s try something, say we have a ball and a box. You take the ball and put it in the box. Where’s the ball? In the box, of course. You watched it go in there, you remember it. You can envision it in there. Hell, here’s an extremely convenient visual for what you’re probably thinking of: 3:35 . This is a little something called object permanence, the one thing we use to identify intelligence in organisms, and surprisingly ignore it everywhere else. Honestly, I’m just tired of seeing these geometry buffs insisting that anything “4D” has to still be something you can see, taste, and put your dick in. These are just 3D constructs that can be inverted on themselves, get your head out of the tessaract.
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429 but what if time isn't a dimension. What if an atom is a 3dimensional representation of a higher dimensional object. As explained by Da Shi, a cigarette filter is a small thing, but if you were to unroll it and spread it out as a 2d object, it would fill a whole room. As dimensionality rises, physical presence would diminish. Earth, unfolded entirely into a 2d plane would be infinitely larger, but as the speed of light is a constant, on this hypothetical 2d plane, light would take longer to cross the same distance, so time would also move relatively slower due to absolute constraints.
I liked seeing the 2D shadow of a rotating cube behaving exactly the same way as the 2D shadow of the 3D shadow of the rotating tesseract. It really isn't as strange as it's usually claimed to be.
This was actually a really good visualisation of the 4D shape through shadows...the weird animations they throw at us for tesseracts without any real explanation never made sense until I watched this, so thanks! Another one I really liked was an interactive experience someone made of 4D objects slicing (the best way to describe it I think) 'into' 3D space, much like how a 3d object would look to a 2D space person if it went through their space. You were talking about time and space, do you know if people have looked at time as it's own dimensions? A point in time (1D), linear time (2D) and probability (3D)? If so, know any good links?
You got it slightly wrong... A point in time is 0D just like it is in space you can't move. linear time is 1D since you can move forward. Probability is 2D so there are multiple simple timelines parallel stacked one over the other. The question is... what is the Third dimension in time? Theory about the 2nd dimension of time : The laws of physics in the world remains same. It is the natural selection factors that differs. Let's say in a world you toss a coin. No matter how many timelines you see the outcome will be the same if the surrounding conditions are. Now let's say there is another Earth where dinosaurs aren't dead. Why? Because of the law of natural selection. There is always a tiny randomisation in every world. For example, you can have a new element in some other world. Now let's say the meteor that was supposed to hit Earth was made up of a certain element but it doesn't exist in another universe, how will there be a meteor then? Or what if the meteor was made up of some other element and it never came to Earth due to that. Therefore, we can conclude that probability can only be altered by factors such as chemical reactions and the randomness of consciousness....
@@PunamKumari-rc7md If i imagine 2d time as a sheet of paper, and i can move freely up and down, forward and (possibly) back, that means if i move up and down its like a multiverse thing? It would be pretty awesome..
@@PunamKumari-rc7md it’s almost 1 am, the night before my exam and due to not having able to sleep, I have in the rap understanding the fourth dimension and dimension of time. Also i’m thinking that the 3D dimension of time could be the different probabilities that can make 1 y 2 happen
My main take-away was that if you could see in 4d, then no clothing could ever hide sweet bazongas from my view..... I now have a new dream. Ironically, this line of thinking is basically how life perpetuates itself and facilitates evolution. You are all very welcome.
Imagine being on a plane (graph paper, or even just plain old line paper), and you are a line on the 2-D surface X,Y. The paper represents where (You) are and what (You) can percive. If, let's say we have a circle on the paper as well, it would look like a line, save for when it moves either farther, or closer, on the two planes of existence. If we took a shpere, a 3-D object and tried to move it on said 2-d plane, it would be confined to the rules of said dimensional plane. Since the Shere would be able to move in three different dimensions, X,Y,Z The object would appear to be 2-D to you. As the object moves side to side on the x and y scales, it would look normal. Things get weird when you start moving on an axis that doesn't exist. The shpere, while moving on the Z axis passing through the 2-D plane would appear to shrink until it looks like nothing is there, before suddenly popping back up and growing in size. This is a really compact version of things I've been thinking about and am not really sure if its correct.
I watched a similar like 10 video years ago. I'm just now starting a undergrad math degree. Cool stuff. In mathematics, something in dim 4 depends on how the coordinate system vectors and variables are defined. A function of 2 vars is a 3D surface essentially where z = f(x,y). One application is apparent temp as a function of windspeed vs actual temperature. Then in machine learning its even more flexible, where any coordinate vectors / variables can be defined as anything. Different ML algorithms will optimize the higher dimension equations. However, in basic Physics, vectors are restricted to the 3 spatial dimensions, time, or noncontact field forces. And every law of conservation is essentially both a scalar potential function and composition of functions. So there can be different force fields embedded in 3D space. And a higher dimension function can model the system.
so 4D is being able to see the front and back of something, like a medical scan. that kinda makes sense cause you don't see them at the same time but time isn't a spacial dimension. when you see a shape you are always seeing a max of three sides (ex. top, left, right, in isometric), but a cube has 6 sides so you need to see the other three sides to see the full shape ( += bottom, back-left, back-right). So having a fly-through/walk-around image scan is another dimension than a regular "3d" jpeg image.
Okay but i feel like stuff like ghost orbs is fourth dimensional (or higher) beings passing through this dimension so we only see what we can perceive.
i agree, i sometime think that ghosts are 4 dimension beings where we can't see it clearly but can sense them in our 3d senses only... and when we see them, the image is scary because the distortions and errors in our 3d senses ...
Interesting but wouldn’t the 4d being have mass? You can’t clearly see them but you would know something is there because you hit them but wouldn’t be able to determine what it was. Similar to the ball and box in the 2d plane. You see a line but couldn’t see that it is a box with a ball inside but you know it is something because you hit the box. Maybe you could determine there is something in the box because of experiments like banging on the box and hear that it is hollow.
I've been watching a lot of these videos where ppl explain the 4th dimension and in every single one the top comment always is "You're explaining a 4D in 2D to my 1D brain" lmao everyone thinking they original
Most transit systems are set up in a way that if you were to walk to the escalator exiting the platform that you're on. You will be next to the escalator exiting the platform that you arrive at when you reach your destination. It is done that way to move people more efficiently. The one that came up with that didn't know it at the time but he was thinking fourth dimensionely.
What if 4th dimension isn’t a spatial dimension but a literal mirror dimension of our world where things are similar but different, that means stranger things is 4d and stuff, but it would make sense as a 4th spatial dimension couldn’t fit in with the other three and it’s not time because we live in a 3D world with xyz coords but we also have time so obviously that can’t be it so maybe it’s a literal dimension that’s mirrored or something of our world?
I got close once, I attempted to visualize wormholes connecting 2 points in 3D space I started with the 2D projection of a gravity well and slowly expanded that out in to 3 dimensions (this is already hard enough, as an accurate 3D portrayal of gravity wells requires an inside out sphere) then I spent half an hour trying to move that into some form of 4D approximation I reached a point where I swear I almost had it, only to suffer a sudden headache (which went away just as suddenly) and lose it That was a few years ago, I have not been able to reach that point since
Maths explain them, we on the other hand visualize things with respect to other things we have seen before, there is nothing for reference when visualizing 4th dimension hence we fail to understand it visually.
I agree, I'm glad he put some stuff into simple terms for my simpleton mind to understand. Great idea of using commonalities from a lower dimension to help visualize a higher dimension.
@@bigwig2659 CARL SAGAN USED THE SAME VISUALS THATS WHAT HE COPIED. I mean ffs go watch the Carl Sagan 4d explanation and come back and tell me I'm wrong. This guy is a rip off artist
pyrotechnick Agreed! And not only that, Carl Sagan based his explanation on the book by Edwin Abbot called, “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions” and gives Abbot the properly deserved credit, because Sagan was a gentleman and a scholar and respected the scientific community.
For anyone wondering, the difference between a true 4D Klein bottle vs. the 3D facsimile is: The 4D version doesn't need to pass through itself in order to connect its inside surface to its outside surface.
I agree, it's hard to wrap my mind around too. We don't have the mental capacity to directly visualize 4D objects, because our capacity for visualization is learned from what we can see in the outside world. (hence why people born blind have non-visual dreams.) But the concept is similar to this: A figure-8 is the 2D facsimile of a Moebius strip, but a real 3D Moebius strip doesn't need to pass through itself to connect its two ends together like a figure-8 does, because a real 3D Moebius strip has that extra degree of freedom provided by the Z axis. Similarly a real 4D Klein bottle has an extra degree of freedom provided by the W axis, allowing the little connecting tube to wrap around its main body instead of having to pass through it.
This made a lot of sense to me, the one thing I defend understand though was that a difference between 1d and 2d and 2d and 3d is that it involves stacking infinite of themselves in a new direction, so this doesn’t relay have that. I have not looked into this before so I don’t relay know what I’m doing.
First time seeing @The Science Elf channel and I'm impressed because I feel adding time as the 4th dimension is a ruse to halt imagination of higher dimensions. I have seen examples of these kinds of roadblocks in chemistry, electronics, physics, medicine, and more. I love Your explanation of why; mine simply is that, time also exists in 2D space, as well, and in 4th, and no doubt, in 5th, 6th, etc. Great work Friend! Subbed 👍👍
@@seanleith5312 not really. We just can't understand it. If we pick something up from a 2d world, a 2d being would witness it disappear right in front of them since they can't see up or down. You can't explain how it happened to a 2d being. If a 4d being was to move an object to the extra dimension that they have access to, we would witness it disappear. For us it's impossible, but for them its not.
@@seanleith5312 because 4d is not spacial, when 3d is already space. 2d is time, and 1d is a single atom. 4d must be something else, I'd say spiritual, in other words: GOD.
I imagine 4 or more dimensions as connecting two parts of the room that do not normally connect in 3 dimensions but can also connect in 3 dimensions. It is also like having an invisable space directly next to you that you can't see but you know is there. Almost like seeing something out of the corner of your eye but when you look at it it is gone. Also I imagine 4 or more dimensions almost like a room of mirrors where the reflected images actually connect even though an image reflected through two mirrors does not touch the image still appears in the second mirror. Now imagine that a 4th dimensional object can pass through what would seem like a solid object in 3 dimensions and be viewed as a 3 dimensional object. What would happen if you touched a 4 dimensional object passing through a 3d plane? Well I imagine it would feel like "pins and needles" since this object does not actually exist in 3 dimensions. However it would be very interesting to note how 4th dimensional objects can interact with 3 dimensional objects in unseen ways like from the invisible space that I mentioned earlier. For example if you knock an object off the table it falls to the floor. In this example if you were to knock an object through 4 dimensions it would disappear, bump your arm from an unseen direction and then land in the corner of the room. Hypothetically speaking of course 😅😅😅
This is 6 years ago and I just figured this out on my own without even seeing this video. I also tried solving time travel, but it seems no one has got to that yet, so I will have to await my predictions. 4D is basically like a void. you cant hide anything, nor collide with anything. you did a good job on explaining it.
THIS IS THE ONE. THIS IS IT. after watching 5 other videos (not kidding) at my work desk trying to understand what the fuck a “4D” is, I came across this last video. And now I finally understand. I finally understand how 4D would or should work and why we can’t comprehend or access this “space”. This was a perfect video. Truly educational thank you for dumbing it down for us whom don’t understand
When you die, you go to the 4D plane. There, you will be able to perceive everything in the 3D plane still, just as we can perceive anything in the 2D plane. However, just as anything in the 2D plane would not be able to perceive anything in the 3D plane (us), we are unable to perceive anything in the 4D plane. When you die, you become less of an astral being and more of a light source able to see everything. To take it one step further, maybe we're all already dead while our relatives from the 2D plane continue to mourn us... idek what im saying
@DJ FX Even in 0-dimensional space, there remains to be a point! It is not pointless, especially in higher dimensions! Please correctly perceive my comment as a joke.
This video really helped by understanding of the fourth dimension however, When you were showing the differences between the dimensions with pencil like a graph where would the pencil for the fourth dimension go?
Man I used to watch 4D dimension videos on youtube since my 15 years old, im 22 years old now still watching 4D dimension videos and i still don't get it.. lmfao
this is actually a good explanation. i really cant imagine a 4d before because we clearly cant perceive 4d things in our 3d world but this vid helps me a lot to understand. Thank u so much. and no, this isnt for my science project. i just love learning new interesting things wieeee
Sosig Not the ghost as we know it, you know the way people think it’s a spirit from a dead body that’s stuck between worlds because those things don’t exist in science, but instead ”ghosts” would be 4D entities that we somehow can sense but not see. But in instances when we do see them would probably be because they somehow got into our 3D world and my personal explaination based on theories of when people hear ”ghosts talk” is that sound can bounce through levels of different dimensions so it passes though our level sometimes, so we can’t see the entities talking because they exist on another level, however, we can hear the sound waves made by them because it bounces to our level
Ian Alojado “People like us”? Please, just speak for yourself. This video is a plagiarism from the late Carl Sagan’s video on the 4th dimension based on Edwin Abbott’s novel from the late 1800s on Flatland.
@@ianalojado699 not really a troll. I'm just amazed you think this is actual science to the degree you feel compelled to make a comment. You're a fool and you should know that.
It is amazing when you realize you can see through things. And the 3d shadows are amazing. And actually seeing the world in real 3d is spectacular!! The most beautiful sight ever.
1:11 that 4D tesseract diagram on a 2D plane is the most neat i have ever seen. Plus it baffles my mind in the sense that we already see 3D objects on our 2D screens or pages. But here, we are seeing a 2D representation of a 4D object on a 2D plane inside a 2D screen!
Imagine 4d creatures using 3 dimensional screens to convey theories on 5 dimensions
Oh boi
Hahahah 😂
My head hurts
Well that's a good one
Etc
fun fact:
If you watch all of the dimension videos on UA-cam, you become crazy and still don't get it.
I did and I wanted to shoot myself from comprehending and mentally and physically visualizing the 4th dimension. Currently writing a book titled "How I Nearly Broke The Current Universe"
What if you get it and you become crazy ?
@@That_One_Guy... I guess I would want that because I didn't get it and I feel kind of dumb
Oh god thank you ! i still dont get it too i feel stupid ...
We can’t comprehend it, don’t even try. It makes me sick the more and more i try to get my brain to see it. I’ll just stick to 3D thanks.
I've watched many videos trying to understand 4D and this one has gotten me the closest. Well done.
the shadow example made so much sense. never seen that comparison before
You should give credit to the creator 9f flatland.
x2
There is no 4th dimension. It doesn't exist.
@@Gamefan86 but you can imagine it
Just a suggestion: Turn on the Phase Reverse on your Preamp/ DAW for your microphone to eliminate the "underwater" out-of-phase sound, and turn your compressor to at least 4:1 to level out the constant change in distance from the mic. The presentation itself is good.
Bro that's good advice but this video is 5 years old, this guy has improved dramatically
Flipping phase on a single source of audio ahieves nothing lol phase is only relative when listenin to 2 different sources simultaneously.
@@thecianinator 😂 my first time finding this channel ever
Actually, this is from using a stupid noise cancellation plugin.
@@lackokalman Yeah we cancel out the background hum that would bother no one to completely mess up the voice of the speaker while adding weird underwater noises.
Are we shadows of our 4d selves ?
Good question
If it were true, your 'shadow' would invert itself inside out every time your real body rotated... I don't think most people sleep normally until they turn over and have all of their innards pop out and wrap around them! But those are still the right types of questions to ask
Question blew my mind
When i thought i finnally understood it. I could almost interact with 4d in 3d imaginary
But it just got so complicated
Btw what dimension is light
to make 4d just add water, some shaking and air.
(Cinemas would agree)
Took me 2 seconds too long to get the joke lol
Ralsei yeah i dont get it too
Ralsei, have you been to those “4D cinemas” if you haven’t, it’s basically 3D but your chair shakes and when there is like a water effect on screen, they will spray water on you
@Augusto Cejas nah your iq is just too high to belive that the cinema fakery is acctually 4D
@Augusto Cejas Don't be so tough on yourself mate, it's alright :)
I read a book called Hyperspace by Michio Kaku once. There was a passage where someone proposed thinking of a cube, unfolding it into a 2d series of squares, making the squares into cubes and then refolding them into a cube as a means of picturing a hypercube.
Also, I may be misinformed but I thought spacetime was a dimension.
I’ve watched many videos explaining 4D, some very good. This explained things I haven’t heard before.
I love it when the smart people talk to the rest of us like we are people.
Maybe so, on different subjects - but this guy is not smart. He's talking trash, I'm afraid.
👽 hmmmm
@you tube Because he's making up theories - which is fine - and pretending that they relate to reality - which, unless that is proven, is not fine. In my humble opinion, anyway. I want proof, or at least very strong circumstantial evidence that can be demonstrated in repeatable and potentially-falsifiable experiment.
@@jonb6417 how tf are u supposed to prove that? its obviously all h theories cos we will never ever be able to prove the existence of other dimensions (why? we can’t even see them, our minds cannot even imagine how they look like)
@@jonb6417 he just explained it using the logic of math
is there a beginners guide for this beginners guide this shit too confusing for me
It's trapped in the fourth dimension. Go ahead, rEacH iN
I'll explain it
Shit
Shit
Shit shit shit
This was by far the best explanation I’ve seen. So good that I scoured the internet to find it again. Now if you can just get me to understand 11 dimensions
I have no idea but could it be the ability to perceive the entirety of the multiverse at once
@@Waerom1 Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. (Notice the associated black “space” of WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) WHAT IS E=MC2 is gravity. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. INDEED, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON ON BALANCE; AS it IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. LOOK at what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!(THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) Consider what is the ORANGE AND setting Sun. Magnificent. Notice that, ON BALANCE, the curvature or shape of WHAT IS THE MOON matches that of WHAT IS THE EARTH/GROUND. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is THE SUN along WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE (ON BALANCE). Magnificent. I have CLEARLY proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Great.
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
I really like how you rotate the tesseract to show that all squares inside are the same size, that really gives me a better understanding of its nature
Here's fuel for thought: as 3D beings, we can fully perceive anything and everything on a 2D plane (as demonstrated by the circle-in-the-box scenario), however due to the lack of the third dimention, a (theoretical) 2D person would find it impossible to look "up" and see us, as we simply exist above their dimension.
Taking this one step further - if a 4D person was to look at a 3D plane, they too would be able to perceive everything at once - you, the house you're in, the plumbing of the house, your organs digesting your last meal... anything. And the scary part is, as we exist on a 3D plane, we would be completely unable to look "out" to see these 4D people. They could exist, and be watching you read this, right now, but you wouldn't be able to tell. ;)
@@datashe yup, more random unique data is better for them
Blessed are those who cannot see and still believe!
That's the kind of thoughts Lovecraft pleasured himself to on lonely nights.
Also, if you ever encounter a color you've never seen before, don't go near it.
Well, you'd see something, right? You'd see a 3d cross section of them. Although we wouldn't really be able to know what the true shape is
@@cb1671 Would you though? Go back to the example I gave about a 2D plane - how would a 2D human be able to look "up", and see us? They simply can't, as they're restricted in what they can see by the plane on which they exist. They could probably see our shadow, if we were to cast it over them, but that's about it.
In terms of 3D observing 4D, I see no reason as to why we wouldn't be able to see the shadow of a 4D person, but we wouldn't be able to directly observe them.
Fourth Dimension: Spectator Mode
Fax😂😂😂
But 5th dimension?
@@charlotttej that's where Sci Craft come in
@@MrSirSquishy lmao
@@charlotttej noclip
Not sure if I completely understand the fourth dimension yet but I feel like this video has gotten me closer to it. Thank you.
This is soooooo exciting. Especially when on considers using quaternions for rotations in higher dimensional spaces.
It's interesting because we can't see 4D objects because we live in a 3D universe, however, hypothetically speaking, we could see the 3D shadows of 4D objects if we found some.
No we can't. because there are no 4D objects.
I get you, your logic is same as how we view 3D objects in 2D (Front, Top and Side View) but the thing is we haven't really seen a 4D object.
@@anuragsingh9847 we can see what the shadow of the of a 4d object in a 3d universe
@@jonb6417 maybe there are andour eyes cant
@@elnurgadirli1013 I agree that is a possibility; you make a good point!
"You can see all sides of the box and the sphere inside. Now doesn't that freak you out?"
Glass boxes: *am I a joke to you*
Anything Transparent: am I a joke to you?
@@TheWeen344 so transparent thimgs are 4D?
@@Loo_Kah no. The 4th dimensional cube that we all call "tesseract" is the equivalent of a glass box in our dimension. It is made for us to understand how cubes work on 4 dimensions. The real terrasact is a "closed" object in our perspective, we will still be able to see all it's sides but we will need to walk around the box to see it. However, as for 4d beings, they will be able to see it's "shadow" as a 3d object, but will still be able to see all it's sides even if they looked at it in one perspective. Basically, it's similar on how "glass" cubes are made for nursery students to understand how a box works, and how the shadow of a box works, we will be able to see all sides of it as a line at an upper perspective, but 2d beings will need to walk around to see all of it's sides. I hope your mind doesn't shut off simultaneously after reading this...
The idea of 4th dimension beings can see inside the box is not correct.
If there's actually a fourth dimension then there could be another part of the box that we didn't know which could block the view to see the sphere.
@@Noobnormality thx now i can finish my science project
Just discovering this video now, but it definitely helped me understand 4 dimensional space better. The revolving/rotating tesseract was most helpful! Thank you!
The 3D image of the moving tesserac really helped me understand things a lot better. It's like life blooms around you. You can open 3d objects up and around and back into themselves. Think flipping a doughnut inside out and back again.
Now watch what happens when it starts spinning
Me:it's not already spinning
mr wadledee 😂😂
mr wadledee lmao right 😭😭
Exactly 😭😭😭
You're explaining 4D to me
In my 3D world
On my 2D screen
And I'm trying to understand with my 1D brain... and this comment is original in 0 dimensions.
😂
Same
How overused is this
@@siabang9731 I see it too many damn times
It means they are all connected with conciousness
I couldn't wrap my head around regarding this matter until now. Thank you! You've gained another subscriber.
Definitely one of my favorite explanations of the fourth dimension!
i always imagined 4d as being able to perceive things from all directions at once in and out, if that makes sense.
No in and out exits in 3D. If you take their components out it would only be in X Y and Z axis there is no extra axis.
@@someone-en1gg he said abt 4d not 3d
@Wither take a look at Carl Sagan explaining the 4th dimension. It’s perfect.
View of a fly?
Looked like a rotating taurus field.
Imagine the horror Mario felt, being controlled by someone to smash objects with his heads, and can only see lines along his way, the horror is giving me anxiety.
@@ItsMeMissV369 holy shit stfu
If 3D beings see in 2D
2D being in 1D
And 1D being in 0D
Then are 0D beings blind?
Edit: btw mario hits blocks *with his fists.*
100th like
@@ItsMeMissV369 the stars and planets don't affect your life in any way. Astrology is stupid and pointless.
@@trickzclipz5910 you aren't wrong
This has been the best video to explain 4 dimensions thank you my dude
4:30 this part is one of the most useful visualizations I've ever seen. I don't know why they aren't showing the 4D shadows rotating like this in every video about the 4th dimension!
I appreciate the way you explain it but the audio is giving me a migraine.
True
Same
true bro..
!
Audio is from the 4th dimension. He is on a whole another level of existence...
Me too. Sounds like a bad Skype call
"I know what some people are thinking, couldn't you consider time a dimension?"
No, my dumb ass was not thinking that at all.
4D is time doesn't rly make sense every demension has time in it, being able to go in the past when you existed let's say exactly 10seconds and then you go in the future also exactly 10seconds does not make sense if you think about it like there should be a difference even so close to zero that could be considered negligible so well you didn't exist in that time. When we take 4d as time you existing in the past present and future doesn't really make sense since 4D is just 3D with more perpendicular lines or more planes that makes the 4D somewhat special so just so you know time is not 4D
@Infamous Comment Stealer add *Me Incredible meme here*
Dimension is dimension
@@rioksek8930 The way I see it, just because an object can only move on a 2D plane, does that magically mean the third dimension doesn’t exist for it? Of course not, just because you can’t observe something from one perspective doesn’t nullify it’s existence. And your example relies heavily on time TRAVEL, instead of what time is supposed to be: a measurement system. Just like length, width, and distance. Sound familiar? Let’s try something, say we have a ball and a box. You take the ball and put it in the box. Where’s the ball? In the box, of course. You watched it go in there, you remember it. You can envision it in there. Hell, here’s an extremely convenient visual for what you’re probably thinking of: 3:35 . This is a little something called object permanence, the one thing we use to identify intelligence in organisms, and surprisingly ignore it everywhere else.
Honestly, I’m just tired of seeing these geometry buffs insisting that anything “4D” has to still be something you can see, taste, and put your dick in. These are just 3D constructs that can be inverted on themselves, get your head out of the tessaract.
time Is 2d. space is 3d. a single atom is 1d. 4d might be spiritual realm but not spacial because space is already at 3d. Deal with it.
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429 but what if time isn't a dimension. What if an atom is a 3dimensional representation of a higher dimensional object. As explained by Da Shi, a cigarette filter is a small thing, but if you were to unroll it and spread it out as a 2d object, it would fill a whole room. As dimensionality rises, physical presence would diminish. Earth, unfolded entirely into a 2d plane would be infinitely larger, but as the speed of light is a constant, on this hypothetical 2d plane, light would take longer to cross the same distance, so time would also move relatively slower due to absolute constraints.
I liked seeing the 2D shadow of a rotating cube behaving exactly the same way as the 2D shadow of the 3D shadow of the rotating tesseract. It really isn't as strange as it's usually claimed to be.
What a splendid and spot on explanation! Your every was matching with my present state of mind
This was actually a really good visualisation of the 4D shape through shadows...the weird animations they throw at us for tesseracts without any real explanation never made sense until I watched this, so thanks! Another one I really liked was an interactive experience someone made of 4D objects slicing (the best way to describe it I think) 'into' 3D space, much like how a 3d object would look to a 2D space person if it went through their space.
You were talking about time and space, do you know if people have looked at time as it's own dimensions? A point in time (1D), linear time (2D) and probability (3D)? If so, know any good links?
You got it slightly wrong... A point in time is 0D just like it is in space you can't move. linear time is 1D since you can move forward. Probability is 2D so there are multiple simple timelines parallel stacked one over the other. The question is... what is the Third dimension in time?
Theory about the 2nd dimension of time : The laws of physics in the world remains same. It is the natural selection factors that differs. Let's say in a world you toss a coin. No matter how many timelines you see the outcome will be the same if the surrounding conditions are. Now let's say there is another Earth where dinosaurs aren't dead. Why? Because of the law of natural selection. There is always a tiny randomisation in every world. For example, you can have a new element in some other world. Now let's say the meteor that was supposed to hit Earth was made up of a certain element but it doesn't exist in another universe, how will there be a meteor then? Or what if the meteor was made up of some other element and it never came to Earth due to that. Therefore, we can conclude that probability can only be altered by factors such as chemical reactions and the randomness of consciousness....
I figured 4D dimensional vision is very similar too having the vision of an MRI machine.
@@PunamKumari-rc7md If i imagine 2d time as a sheet of paper, and i can move freely up and down, forward and (possibly) back, that means if i move up and down its like a multiverse thing? It would be pretty awesome..
here is the example how can your own mind be your biggest enemy
@@PunamKumari-rc7md it’s almost 1 am, the night before my exam and due to not having able to sleep, I have in the rap understanding the fourth dimension and dimension of time. Also i’m thinking that the 3D dimension of time could be the different probabilities that can make 1 y 2 happen
"Let's just dip our toe in"
Shows picture of cursed bathtub
How is it cursed
@@vvioIet how's it not
How is it cursed?
Most psychopaths will kill in them
Time stamp
My main take-away was that if you could see in 4d, then no clothing could ever hide sweet bazongas from my view..... I now have a new dream.
Ironically, this line of thinking is basically how life perpetuates itself and facilitates evolution. You are all very welcome.
Thank you! As a 12 year old I never understood much of this, and now as a 15 year old, I did through this video. Thank you, thank you.
The 4 dimensions:
D1: Length
D2: Width
D3: Depth
D4: ERROR 307:
PHYSICS NOT FOUND.....
Actually dimensions are
1:length
2:width
3:how high is the object
4:in and out of it self
No
The 4 dimensions:
D1:length
D2:width
D3:height
D4:trength
@@Kuma_zou what is the trenth
x I.R.G_HERO x look it up in Google
"Here's where things get tricky."
me who didnt understand most of the stuff he talked about beforehand: *_IT WAS ALREADY TRICKY_*
I really do want to understand this stuff but its driving me crazy 1d,2d,3d,4d,and 5d how far do these Dimensions go is there a 1d
@@reneejohnson6944 yes, there is a 1d, its called a line
and yeah, this is driving me crazy too 😵
Imagine being on a plane (graph paper, or even just plain old line paper), and you are a line on the 2-D surface X,Y. The paper represents where (You) are and what (You) can percive. If, let's say we have a circle on the paper as well, it would look like a line, save for when it moves either farther, or closer, on the two planes of existence. If we took a shpere, a 3-D object and tried to move it on said 2-d plane, it would be confined to the rules of said dimensional plane. Since the Shere would be able to move in three different dimensions, X,Y,Z The object would appear to be 2-D to you.
As the object moves side to side on the x and y scales, it would look normal. Things get weird when you start moving on an axis that doesn't exist. The shpere, while moving on the Z axis passing through the 2-D plane would appear to shrink until it looks like nothing is there, before suddenly popping back up and growing in size.
This is a really compact version of things I've been thinking about and am not really sure if its correct.
don't worry, it's bs anyway, so you didn't miss out on anything
this raised more questions than it solved and now i am interested good job
I watched a similar like 10 video years ago. I'm just now starting a undergrad math degree. Cool stuff.
In mathematics, something in dim 4 depends on how the coordinate system vectors and variables are defined. A function of 2 vars is a 3D surface essentially where z = f(x,y). One application is apparent temp as a function of windspeed vs actual temperature. Then in machine learning its even more flexible, where any coordinate vectors / variables can be defined as anything. Different ML algorithms will optimize the higher dimension equations.
However, in basic Physics, vectors are restricted to the 3 spatial dimensions, time, or noncontact field forces. And every law of conservation is essentially both a scalar potential function and composition of functions. So there can be different force fields embedded in 3D space. And a higher dimension function can model the system.
This is the closest I've come to getting my head around a tesseract. Thank you.
Me too. I've seen a hundred videos about them, but never the shadow analogy. That was great.
Wdym "closest you've come?" A tesseract is probably the easiest 4d object to understand.
U are explaining 4D in this virtual 3D world on a 2D sceen and im trying to understand through my 1D brain... 😂😂😂
Which you see thanks to your 1D brain.
Sciencephile the A.I.
Oh so somebody actually knows him here
Maksymilian Król hey
HELLO
so 4D is being able to see the front and back of something, like a medical scan. that kinda makes sense cause you don't see them at the same time but time isn't a spacial dimension. when you see a shape you are always seeing a max of three sides (ex. top, left, right, in isometric), but a cube has 6 sides so you need to see the other three sides to see the full shape ( += bottom, back-left, back-right). So having a fly-through/walk-around image scan is another dimension than a regular "3d" jpeg image.
This might be the best explanation I've seen. Brilliant.
Here's a fun thought: what if "shadow people" are just the 3D shadow of a 4D being chilling out around you???
Okay but i feel like stuff like ghost orbs is fourth dimensional (or higher) beings passing through this dimension so we only see what we can perceive.
i agree, i sometime think that ghosts are 4 dimension beings where we can't see it clearly but can sense them in our 3d senses only... and when we see them, the image is scary because the distortions and errors in our 3d senses ...
Interesting but wouldn’t the 4d being have mass? You can’t clearly see them but you would know something is there because you hit them but wouldn’t be able to determine what it was. Similar to the ball and box in the 2d plane. You see a line but couldn’t see that it is a box with a ball inside but you know it is something because you hit the box. Maybe you could determine there is something in the box because of experiments like banging on the box and hear that it is hollow.
@@bigpapa21tx1 I'm wondering if a 3D being could even physically interact with a 4D entity.
@@abbiepancakeeater52 that is exactly what goes on in my mind every day
I've been watching a lot of these videos where ppl explain the 4th dimension and in every single one the top comment always is "You're explaining a 4D in 2D to my 1D brain" lmao everyone thinking they original
Im the original creator of that phrase. You may now give me praise.
@@princeofallnegros4035 TK Kirkland?
not everyone. its the same person typing same text in a different dimensions lol
Ssophiax Well they did say they have a 1d brain
@@dunkdunkin669 lol
Most transit systems are set up in a way that if you were to walk to the escalator exiting the platform that you're on. You will be next to the escalator exiting the platform that you arrive at when you reach your destination. It is done that way to move people more efficiently. The one that came up with that didn't know it at the time but he was thinking fourth dimensionely.
What if 4th dimension isn’t a spatial dimension but a literal mirror dimension of our world where things are similar but different, that means stranger things is 4d and stuff, but it would make sense as a 4th spatial dimension couldn’t fit in with the other three and it’s not time because we live in a 3D world with xyz coords but we also have time so obviously that can’t be it so maybe it’s a literal dimension that’s mirrored or something of our world?
Did you record this in the bottom of a full bathtub?
+Uriah Siner
How about you focus on the content of the video, you moron.
Its difficult to focus when it sounds like the info is being delivered via a spongebob-esk bubble system.
BRA YOU MADE MY NIGHT
Uriah Siner- I was thinking the same thing. Hard to focus on the info when it sounds like it was recorded in the 1930s
Hard to focus on something when an absurdly annoying voice makes you close the video
Who else is still trying to imagine the 4th dimension?
This is quantum rocket surgery sir. Five nobel prizes for you if you make it happen.
gave it up already
I got close once, I attempted to visualize wormholes connecting 2 points in 3D space
I started with the 2D projection of a gravity well and slowly expanded that out in to 3 dimensions (this is already hard enough, as an accurate 3D portrayal of gravity wells requires an inside out sphere) then I spent half an hour trying to move that into some form of 4D approximation
I reached a point where I swear I almost had it, only to suffer a sudden headache (which went away just as suddenly) and lose it
That was a few years ago, I have not been able to reach that point since
God, yes.. 🧠
I can do that
I like to watch videos like this from time to time to remind myself how dumb I am.
I really like this way of describing it visually, this is like a 3d interpretation on a 2d picture.
BOY, since when do I have this much interest in the fourth dimention!?
After about a hundred videos on 4D *I STILL DON'T GET IT!!!*
Really Now it s impossible..for humans think in 4d is not pissible we are in a 3 d world
then how are these people able to explain these things, did they just pull these out of their ass?
Maths explain them, we on the other hand visualize things with respect to other things we have seen before, there is nothing for reference when visualizing 4th dimension hence we fail to understand it visually.
same
just imagine a texture malfunction in a game that you can see through and not throug hat the same time
Your video is one of easiest to understand regarding 4d. Thanks for making it.
So, what would a 4 dimensional sphere look like?
Wow this video has the best explanation of the 4th dimension I’ve ever seen so far!
I agree, I'm glad he put some stuff into simple terms for my simpleton mind to understand. Great idea of using commonalities from a lower dimension to help visualize a higher dimension.
He literally copied the Carl Sagan explanation. Wtf?
@@pyrotechnick420 its way better. He used simple visual examples to explain it.
@@bigwig2659 CARL SAGAN USED THE SAME VISUALS THATS WHAT HE COPIED. I mean ffs go watch the Carl Sagan 4d explanation and come back and tell me I'm wrong. This guy is a rip off artist
pyrotechnick Agreed! And not only that, Carl Sagan based his explanation on the book by Edwin Abbot called, “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions” and gives Abbot the properly deserved credit, because Sagan was a gentleman and a scholar and respected the scientific community.
For anyone wondering, the difference between a true 4D Klein bottle vs. the 3D facsimile is: The 4D version doesn't need to pass through itself in order to connect its inside surface to its outside surface.
but does it hold more beer than regular 3D bottle?
If you're talking about normal 3D beer, then it would hold an infinite amount.
This is so hard to wrap my mind around.
That's the best explanation I've seen of this. Thanks!
I agree, it's hard to wrap my mind around too. We don't have the mental capacity to directly visualize 4D objects, because our capacity for visualization is learned from what we can see in the outside world. (hence why people born blind have non-visual dreams.) But the concept is similar to this: A figure-8 is the 2D facsimile of a Moebius strip, but a real 3D Moebius strip doesn't need to pass through itself to connect its two ends together like a figure-8 does, because a real 3D Moebius strip has that extra degree of freedom provided by the Z axis. Similarly a real 4D Klein bottle has an extra degree of freedom provided by the W axis, allowing the little connecting tube to wrap around its main body instead of having to pass through it.
This made a lot of sense to me, the one thing I defend understand though was that a difference between 1d and 2d and 2d and 3d is that it involves stacking infinite of themselves in a new direction, so this doesn’t relay have that. I have not looked into this before so I don’t relay know what I’m doing.
Very helpful. Thank you!
on magic mushrooms i witnessed more than the 4th dimension.
Nikole Ribeiro nigga you a 3rd dimensional object. It’s blastphemy to say you can comprehend what we will never comprehend in this 3D world.
One day, I'll build up the courage to watch a Tool music video. while I'm on shrooms
Damm high for sure
@@asuichan8436 r/wooshed
Dmt
The mic quality degrades the video
It really doesnt.
lol i was thinking the same
Max Kemp it's still awesome
The mic quality degrades women
It's a joke i'm not a feminist
If he just ran the entire thing through Audition's simple noise remover :o
First time seeing @The Science Elf channel and I'm impressed because I feel adding time
as the 4th dimension is a ruse to halt imagination of higher dimensions.
I have seen examples of these kinds of roadblocks in chemistry, electronics, physics, medicine, and more.
I love Your explanation of why; mine simply is that, time also exists in 2D space, as well, and in 4th, and no doubt, in 5th, 6th, etc.
Great work Friend! Subbed
👍👍
This will take my mind a while to digest what I just saw. Thank you for this.
Dude: "Explains 4d" like he has experience it and knows it A to Z
Same dude towards the end: This does things that we can't even imagine.
No matter how hard he tries, it is just not so convincing. There is something wrong in that 4D logic.
@@seanleith5312 not really. We just can't understand it. If we pick something up from a 2d world, a 2d being would witness it disappear right in front of them since they can't see up or down. You can't explain how it happened to a 2d being. If a 4d being was to move an object to the extra dimension that they have access to, we would witness it disappear. For us it's impossible, but for them its not.
@@seanleith5312 it’s just that us 3D humans are not in 4d.
@@seanleith5312 because 4d is not spacial, when 3d is already space. 2d is time, and 1d is a single atom. 4d must be something else, I'd say spiritual, in other words: GOD.
@@theplacebeyondthelies2429 omg
did you just assume my dimension?
I'm dead 💀⚰️🥀
Nooo! I'd give you a 2! But 1 is as high as you got!
.
.
#sarcasmtoo
cathal m 有点意思
One joke.
Yooooooooo....... you've destroy everyone with this comment... 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😭😭😭😭🧨💥
this is the best video introducing someone to the topic.
Very nice video..
Q: so a small ballon inside a big clear balloon is the 4th dimension?
0:52 that animation alone deserves a like ;-)
I imagine 4 or more dimensions as connecting two parts of the room that do not normally connect in 3 dimensions but can also connect in 3 dimensions. It is also like having an invisable space directly next to you that you can't see but you know is there. Almost like seeing something out of the corner of your eye but when you look at it it is gone. Also I imagine 4 or more dimensions almost like a room of mirrors where the reflected images actually connect even though an image reflected through two mirrors does not touch the image still appears in the second mirror. Now imagine that a 4th dimensional object can pass through what would seem like a solid object in 3 dimensions and be viewed as a 3 dimensional object. What would happen if you touched a 4 dimensional object passing through a 3d plane? Well I imagine it would feel like "pins and needles" since this object does not actually exist in 3 dimensions. However it would be very interesting to note how 4th dimensional objects can interact with 3 dimensional objects in unseen ways like from the invisible space that I mentioned earlier. For example if you knock an object off the table it falls to the floor. In this example if you were to knock an object through 4 dimensions it would disappear, bump your arm from an unseen direction and then land in the corner of the room. Hypothetically speaking of course 😅😅😅
This is 6 years ago and I just figured this out on my own without even seeing this video. I also tried solving time travel, but it seems no one has got to that yet, so I will have to await my predictions. 4D is basically like a void. you cant hide anything, nor collide with anything. you did a good job on explaining it.
Hello
Fantastic video, best I've seen on the topic.
Is your voice trapped in the fourth Dimension?
It's trapped in a 1992 floppy disk.
A 4D tesseract is basically a net made from cubes, like a 3D cube is made from a net of 2D squares.
Simply clever way of SEEING it. Thanks!
Kranti S : Interestingly enough, we can only visualize the 4d version of the 3d cube in 2d. Strange, isn't it?
Cubeception
No. It’s not like that at all.
This was the best explanation of th 4th dimension I have ever heard
THIS IS THE ONE. THIS IS IT. after watching 5 other videos (not kidding) at my work desk trying to understand what the fuck a “4D” is, I came across this last video. And now I finally understand. I finally understand how 4D would or should work and why we can’t comprehend or access this “space”. This was a perfect video. Truly educational thank you for dumbing it down for us whom don’t understand
this is like the only video that helps me understand 4d. it's such a mystical concept and i love it
So... we could be the shadow of a 4-dimensional universe?
Eobard Ferguson Thats...pretty deep when you think about it.
Or we could be holograms.
No. Shadows are not made of matter.
It's a metaphor, Any Old Biscuit.
Why can't I travel thru time? Or why hasn't the person I'm shadowing for travelled through the fourth spatial dimension
one of the best 4d explaination i've seen
Very simple and thorough explanation. Good educating
When you die, you go to the 4D plane. There, you will be able to perceive everything in the 3D plane still, just as we can perceive anything in the 2D plane.
However, just as anything in the 2D plane would not be able to perceive anything in the 3D plane (us), we are unable to perceive anything in the 4D plane. When you die, you become less of an astral being and more of a light source able to see everything.
To take it one step further, maybe we're all already dead while our relatives from the 2D plane continue to mourn us...
idek what im saying
Holy shit this makes sense in a way.
Makes sense but you have no physical power in 3D plane after death
You may have just created a religion
What if you die when you're in the 4D plane
@@siyacer well you go to heaven
You think this is confusing. Try watching a video called "imagining the 10th dimension."
That's not spatial that's talking about time
those videos are ghey
@DJ FX Even in 0-dimensional space, there remains to be a point! It is not pointless, especially in higher dimensions!
Please correctly perceive my comment as a joke.
One step at a time buddy!
Let me work my way up, man
that was the best explanation to 4th dimension that i've ever seen
This video really helped by understanding of the fourth dimension however, When you were showing the differences between the dimensions with pencil like a graph where would the pencil for the fourth dimension go?
Man I used to watch 4D dimension videos on youtube since my 15 years old, im 22 years old now still watching 4D dimension videos and i still don't get it.. lmfao
Thank you for this.
I was finally able to leave this plane of existence and trancend.
If that's the shadow of a 4D cube, is it possible to deduce how it would look like in a 4D view?
Excellent video I think. Got lost not too far into the journey
this is actually a good explanation. i really cant imagine a 4d before because we clearly cant perceive 4d things in our 3d world but this vid helps me a lot to understand. Thank u so much. and no, this isnt for my science project. i just love learning new interesting things wieeee
Are ghosts shadows of 4D beings? 😮
A month late, but they could technically be 4D beings a shadow leaking over to our dimension
Tecnically a shadow of a 4d ghost should be a 3d object not a 2d
@@Juanmoneche could a ghost just be a 2d being breaking into our 3d world?
so you're just gonna assume ghosts actually exist
Sosig Not the ghost as we know it, you know the way people think it’s a spirit from a dead body that’s stuck between worlds because those things don’t exist in science, but instead ”ghosts” would be 4D entities that we somehow can sense but not see. But in instances when we do see them would probably be because they somehow got into our 3D world and my personal explaination based on theories of when people hear ”ghosts talk” is that sound can bounce through levels of different dimensions so it passes though our level sometimes, so we can’t see the entities talking because they exist on another level, however, we can hear the sound waves made by them because it bounces to our level
i like the concept that we are shadows of a 4 dimension , like ancient greek filosophers thought
Good job you did such a good job explaining it all just makes sense to me
I am in awe of how amazing you are in explaining and making it more understandable for people like us with less background on spatial dimensions!!
Ian Alojado “People like us”? Please, just speak for yourself. This video is a plagiarism from the late Carl Sagan’s video on the 4th dimension based on Edwin Abbott’s novel from the late 1800s on Flatland.
@@doclee8755 labot ba diay ka? hahaha atimana imong gipang sulti oy, hilabtanon. di puede ma amaze lang? di man gani ka kabalo mag explain ani psh
It's not real science. stop acting like it is.
@@bigdaddynero3497 I don't waste my energy on trolls, sorry.
@@ianalojado699 not really a troll. I'm just amazed you think this is actual science to the degree you feel compelled to make a comment. You're a fool and you should know that.
The best Explanation I've found yet on the Tesseract on youtube.
I have a question, is it possible to view any 2d objects like paper or screens in a 4d world?
Recommending this to my teacher
It is amazing when you realize you can see through things. And the 3d shadows are amazing. And actually seeing the world in real 3d is spectacular!! The most beautiful sight ever.
1:11 that 4D tesseract diagram on a 2D plane is the most neat i have ever seen.
Plus it baffles my mind in the sense that we already see 3D objects on our 2D screens or pages. But here, we are seeing a 2D representation of a 4D object on a 2D plane inside a 2D screen!
i remeber watching this when i was new to the 4th dimension now i look back and see how far ive come
Does the 4th dimension need light?
And what is before the 2 and 1 dimension?