US To Arm Zumwalt-Class Ships With Hypersonic Weapons Amid Tensions With Putin’s Russia & Xi’s China

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 бер 2022
  • The US Navy has decided to repurpose the troubled Zumwalt-class destroyers by retrofitting them with hypersonic missiles. Hypersonic missiles will be installed on three US destroyer-class ships this month, according to a report in Asia Times.
    With this move, Pentagon aims to increase its capabilities at sea and counter possible Chinese and Russian threats. The Zumwalt-class destroyers would be the first US naval platform to be armed with hypersonic weapons.
    #USSZumwalt #HypersonicMissile #USNavy
    00:00 INTRODUCTION
    CHANGES LIKELY IN ZUMWALT-CLASS DESTROYERS
    ISSUES WITH ZUMWALT-CLASS DESTROYERS
    HOW US FARES AGAINST CHINA & RUSSIA IN HYPERSONIC WEAPONS
    CRUX is your daily video news guide to the big events that are shaping our world. We track news, geopolitics, diplomacy and defence strategies and explain how they shape national policies. Crux makes sense of global developments, and analyses their impact on daily lives.
    Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
    Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
    #GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
    Also watch:
    Crux Decode: bit.ly/3MjzIoG
    Crux+ : bit.ly/35mm97B
    Crux Most Watched: bit.ly/3KhJ8iX

КОМЕНТАРІ • 817

  • @stellaohenhen2365
    @stellaohenhen2365 2 роки тому +13

    Good It is about time I was starting to worried about the delay of US ability to get their own hypersonic missiles, however I do believe that United States will do better than the Chinese and Russia when it comes to hypersonic missiles.

  • @supriokonar9584
    @supriokonar9584 2 роки тому +117

    Isn't this the same zumwalt destroyer that doesn't have any ammunitions for it's originally planned main railguns? Because the US navy deemed the cost of firing all of it's rounds in a single battle would be twice the cost the of the vessel itself?

    • @julienjeanmuller
      @julienjeanmuller 2 роки тому +28

      Lol! US military are trolls. Exactly bro. And I guarantee you, them saying that means they been had hypersonic missiles the whole time they were denying it on TV.

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому +21

      It's all bluff and lie 🤥 america with hypersonic missiles is so far from reality, now they are more delusional than ever.

    • @Aryan-nv9kd
      @Aryan-nv9kd 2 роки тому +9

      Basically a trash unproven design which can be sunk by the high waves of the ocean itself xD.
      The US has long proven it's corrupt over funded weapons programs which do not work as advertised.
      They only send these so called "exceptional" weapons to poor countries with 1960s weaponry and then thump their chests in victory for a while before tucking their tails and running out of the country with their failed invasions.
      Their stealth jets have been downed in Siberia by decades old Russian SAM missiles and the new F35s face so many issues that there have been multiple crashes within months of induction.

    • @GangsterAD
      @GangsterAD 2 роки тому +3

      @@Chunkylover. "U.S ARMY HYPERSONIC MISSILE CHECK IT OUT YO"!!..

    • @Hi0613
      @Hi0613 2 роки тому +2

      bro realgun an hypersonic messle it is bad ass

  • @yourmomismywaifu4274
    @yourmomismywaifu4274 2 роки тому +18

    waiting the us to arm with hypersonic missles is like waiting for russia to done with fixing the kutuzov and replace new destroyers

    • @user-co8mk1px4j
      @user-co8mk1px4j 2 роки тому +1

      "Адмирал Нахимов" с вчерашнего дня в строю🤣🇷🇺

    • @yourmomismywaifu4274
      @yourmomismywaifu4274 2 роки тому +5

      @@user-co8mk1px4j good luck with that rusty oversized cruiser

    • @jasondong9721
      @jasondong9721 2 роки тому

      So true lol

  • @phantom_rantom8489
    @phantom_rantom8489 2 роки тому +16

    Everyone here complaining about if the US have hypersonic missiles or not while I'm here thinking of what kind of tank design the US army choose

  • @trade1713
    @trade1713 2 роки тому +15

    Since when The US have hypersonic missiles??
    Have I missed something about them becoming operational?

    • @raymondsarvarian9074
      @raymondsarvarian9074 2 роки тому +5

      No my friend you haven’t miss anything even the latest US hypersonic test was a failure and US dose not have hypersonic weapons. Even Chinese hypersonic is not as fastes Russian missiles, Chinese only hypersonic is a anti ship missile just over the minimum speed of a hypersonic speed. Which it’s still better then US failure after failure tests.

    • @williamsherman1942
      @williamsherman1942 2 роки тому +2

      We had supersonic missiles in the cold war, we stopped using them for the same reason we didn’t focus on anti-air defense. We focused on the air force and navy really, didn’t believe that missiles alone could win the war. If any missiles were to be fired it would be nuclear warheads

    • @bright5801
      @bright5801 2 роки тому +3

      @@raymondsarvarian9074 that's just one program there are so many hypersonic projects going on. the weapon used here will be very similar to the LRHW (dark eagle) which has already started to deliver fire control systems and training has started

    • @apex_blue
      @apex_blue 2 роки тому

      They probably had them operational for a while. I mean it isn’t that hard it’s literally putting wings on a ballistic missile. the space shuttle regularly came into the atmosphere at Mach 20.

    • @t.yiachan869
      @t.yiachan869 Рік тому

      ​@@raymondsarvarian9074 no Buddy the u.s has hypersonic was machine since the 60s they just didn't put it to use,,also there's many hypersonic program so keep praying because we already ahead.

  • @user-dl3nc4jx7k
    @user-dl3nc4jx7k 2 роки тому +28

    only the USA does not have hypersonic missiles themselves, but Russia today used a hypersonic Dagger missile at targets in Ukraine

    • @jamram9924
      @jamram9924 2 роки тому +2

      They’re testing it to see it’s efficacy. What a better place to do this test!

    • @onedivineone
      @onedivineone 2 роки тому

      They claimed to use a hypersonic.. I say B.S

    • @kenshields7922
      @kenshields7922 2 роки тому

      @@jamram9924 yer i agree on your house boomed .🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @juancarlospayan4671
      @juancarlospayan4671 2 роки тому +2

      Russian military is a joke...

    • @jamram9924
      @jamram9924 2 роки тому +2

      @@juancarlospayan4671 their lack of fighting experience makes them appear weak. They didn’t have luxury of fighting in many foreign interventions like the US did in Vietnam and the Middle East. As a combat veteran having lost brothers in arms, our experience came it at a great loss in people and national treasure. They’ll gain a lot of experience in this “operation” and so far it appears they’ve lost many more soldiers than the US did when we returned to Iraq in 2003. Let the body count increase

  • @liewwilliam4334
    @liewwilliam4334 2 роки тому +63

    US is talking about supersonic missiles because they misspelt supersonic to be hypersonic.😁🤣

    • @BorntoYeet
      @BorntoYeet 2 роки тому +30

      Haha good one hilarious great haha.
      Not as funny as dead Russian soldiers though

    • @d.1262
      @d.1262 2 роки тому +6

      @@BorntoYeet Even less funny than dead American volunteers who didn't get the paycheck yet

    • @marya7057
      @marya7057 2 роки тому +2

      @@BorntoYeet Hahahaha

    • @roastingminer6919
      @roastingminer6919 2 роки тому +4

      @@BorntoYeet but its not funnier then all the dead American soldiers in the middle east 🤷

    • @yyperi
      @yyperi 2 роки тому +9

      @@d.1262 Volunteers aren't mercenaries. Ukraine doesn't have to pay them to fight. Russia has to import thousands of Arabs from Syria because his own troops are dead or don't want to be in war. It's quite pathetic for a "superpower".

  • @_XPEHOPE3_
    @_XPEHOPE3_ 2 роки тому +117

    Yes, the United States will deploy hypersonic weapons on Zumwalt-class ships, but with a caveat, this will happen in about 10-20 years and not earlier.

    • @ulyssesbinoya1134
      @ulyssesbinoya1134 2 роки тому +5

      zomwalts only used for parade and advertisements of ships and weaponry...

    • @stephenchen9701
      @stephenchen9701 2 роки тому +2

      That's assuming Biden doesn't divert the funds to his not as urgent infrastructure plan

    • @user-ok2iy6tz3p
      @user-ok2iy6tz3p 2 роки тому +14

      as always: proposed to have lots of capability with low cost. end up with less capability at more than proposed cost.

    • @kenshields7922
      @kenshields7922 2 роки тому +5

      @@stephenchen9701 his son needs the money along with the money he got from ukraine

    • @alexanderheling2057
      @alexanderheling2057 2 роки тому +8

      Ukraine has no control over their country they are a western satellite country since 2014 at least. Western military advisors and geopolitical counselors are in full control not Ukrainian gov/military/citizens.

  • @pauld.9856
    @pauld.9856 2 роки тому +10

    Doesn't the area that is declared as Hypersonic only start at Mach 6? I vaguely remember the F14 Tomcat having long-range air-to-air missiles at Mach 5 about 30 years ago. Then they would have had Hypersonic rockets back then.

    • @marshawk9766
      @marshawk9766 2 роки тому

      I think that category is only supersonic, we are talking of HYPER - > Mach 5 above. But Russia has Mach 20 above.

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 2 роки тому

      Mach 5 +1mph . Anything above mach 5. The thing is that missiles have a high speed at some point along their path but not the whole way. Air to air missiles generally have an initial burn, glide to their target on inertia and some save just a lil bit of fuel to make manuvers at final approach. Aa missiles are mach 3+, 4+, 5+ etc, but not for long so they don't count

    • @apex_blue
      @apex_blue 2 роки тому

      Also ballistic missile and any space rockets goes hypersonic. The space shuttle regularly enters the atmosphere at Mach 20. So we had the technology for years it just was not needed until Russia and China started weaponizing them. ua-cam.com/video/rSPoF7IIefU/v-deo.html

  • @makauonesmus7357
    @makauonesmus7357 2 роки тому +7

    Where will they get hypersonic missiles from,import from China or Russia

  • @pratikdharanep.d.8938
    @pratikdharanep.d.8938 2 роки тому +6

    *Realized first time that US doesn't have hypersonic weapons and not even thier navy has it!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣*

    • @trentlandon9033
      @trentlandon9033 2 роки тому +8

      FYI.. Usa was the first country to test hypersonic.. Just that it doesn't require them... The day it does.. It would be available..
      India should properly feed its hungry homeless people first...your army has weapons from west and Russia.. Lol

    • @pratikdharanep.d.8938
      @pratikdharanep.d.8938 2 роки тому +2

      @@trentlandon9033 *KEEEP BARKINGGG....we r a growing economy and a growing super power....our econony and our public are coming out of poverty!!! In next 10 years china and india will strat ruling the world! Keeep barking!!!*

    • @krizzyDeleon1850
      @krizzyDeleon1850 2 роки тому +3

      @@pratikdharanep.d.8938 in your dreams. Don't worry, being friends with china will make you rich......in debts lol.

    • @humorousshorts739
      @humorousshorts739 2 роки тому

      @@pratikdharanep.d.8938 are bhai kya ch#tiyapa kar rahe ho USA ke pass nahi hai hypersonic missle toh humare pass kaunsa hai.

    • @nischaltyagi8672
      @nischaltyagi8672 2 роки тому +1

      @@trentlandon9033 Brahmos 2 is being jointly developed (world's fastest hypersonic missile) by Russia and India. If you have guts, make your own missile jointly, lmao with another country. Even Brahmos is much better than useless AGM- 86🤣

  • @floydrandol2731
    @floydrandol2731 2 роки тому +4

    Yes, that’s the Weapon our Enemy’s have and claim we don’t. What about the Laser Systems that downs Hypersonic missiles. The Ships were way over on costs and we need to get better for money spent.

  • @dschoas
    @dschoas 2 роки тому +5

    Did they mention a year, when they will have the hypersonic weapons ready to be installed in the ship? 2030 maybe? What do they expect the costs for the fitting of these weapons, magazin, loading mechanism and launch system to be? As much as the already existing hull?

    • @dwanemarsh4378
      @dwanemarsh4378 2 роки тому

      Yes, they have hypersonics. Here is the easier question; We see the Russian Air Force can't even control the skies above Ukraine; what the hell do you think the massive U.S. Air Force would do to them? It would get very ugly, quickly, for Russia. And then, just bring in the A-10's to take out all the hypersonic launchers. The U.S. already knows exactly where they all are (it's called satellites!).

    • @jjt229
      @jjt229 2 роки тому

      Hahaha did you actually believe that Russia is ahead of US in any military technology with a budget more than 10x lower and a lot bigger corruption ? The reason why US is not caring about hypersonic missiles too much is that they are pretty much useless. I bet you read how accurate they are. Only miss target by 10-20 miles xDD When the rocket goes so fast, it is impossible to for it to communicate with any other technology due to plasma it creates, so long range accurate hypersonic missiles for moving targets are a joke :D

  • @juliomenendez5164
    @juliomenendez5164 2 роки тому

    They gotta send 1000 fishing boats and one zumwalt

  • @deven6518
    @deven6518 2 роки тому +7

    There is a bit of iff. Most ballistic and high altitude missiles ate hypersonic at some point along the flight path. Hypersonic missles as defined in the east, can maintain this for the majority of the flight, and some not even at particularly high altitudes. You see, ICBMs are hypersonic and they can be intercepted so Its not just a matter of terminal stage velocity. If they can't achieve and maintain it along the entire path, they'll be useless. It remains to be seen with some "properly independent" information.
    Casue last I remember they had a successful test, but not a successful missile, if that makes sense.

    • @BoomerKeith1
      @BoomerKeith1 2 роки тому

      I think a lot of people think that hypersonic ability is something brand new. Like you said, the US (and Russia and China, etc.) have had hypersonic technology for decades. There's so much more to the effectiveness of hypersonic missiles than just being able to do hypersonic speed. I'm not convinced that what was used in Ukraine was truly a hypersonic missile. Anyone can claim that's what it was. Like you, I've seen reports of tests that were successful in launch and flight, without success of the overall goal. The US DoD announced last year that he first hypersonic missiles would be put into service this year. So, that's not something that just got announced in light of what's happening in Ukraine.

    • @johnnyontar6058
      @johnnyontar6058 2 роки тому

      War in Ukraine

  • @starcraft2f2p77
    @starcraft2f2p77 2 роки тому +25

    US hypersonic cruise missile test failed. US does have other hypersonic weapons. The video didn't say which type of missile.

    • @GangsterAD
      @GangsterAD 2 роки тому +1

      "U.S ARMY HYPERSONIC MISSILE🚀HOMIE"!!..

    • @Hunterxrt
      @Hunterxrt 2 роки тому +6

      USAF AGM-183 failed.Not the US army Dark Eagle hypersonic weapon.US navy plans to equip Zumwalt destroyers with the naval version of the Dark Eagle.

    • @jeffrey4181
      @jeffrey4181 2 роки тому

      The most is subsonic 3.5 mach.

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 2 роки тому +4

      An operational hypersonic LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) missile battery has already been delivered to the Army since October last year. But it wont be until next year at earliest that they deploy it to the front lines. The Navy will soon follow but its to big to fitted on current Arleigh Burke destroyers. Hence, it will be fitted on existing Zumwalt class and Virginia class subs and the future DDG(x). The Airforce have their own versions but it will still take some time for them. What failed is the airforce one.

    • @starcraft2f2p77
      @starcraft2f2p77 2 роки тому +6

      @@Hunterxrt That is a hypersonic glide weapon not hypersonic cruise missile.

  • @Abhay-bz5qp
    @Abhay-bz5qp 2 роки тому +8

    I don’t think US has a hypersonic missile. They failed miserably in testing.

    • @rogerfaint499
      @rogerfaint499 2 роки тому +1

      Those trials conducted by US barely lasted 10 seconds before they exploded.

    • @cybercebuto
      @cybercebuto 2 роки тому +1

      maybe american stick to subsonic which stable than supersonic or hypersonic but late from the competitor

    • @wendelldig591
      @wendelldig591 2 роки тому

      4:45 lol

    • @joebrown1158
      @joebrown1158 2 роки тому +1

      @@wendelldig591 America as a super power can not tell the truth remember what happened in Afghanistan when America tested hypersonic it was all lies America has it before any country

    • @emersonwaminal9164
      @emersonwaminal9164 2 роки тому +1

      Maybe they can test it again in Afghanistan to prove it in some idiots

  • @arvindynr
    @arvindynr 2 роки тому +6

    US doesn't have any successfully tested hypersonic missiles, so what are they going to install in these destroyers? 😂😂

  • @pahtar7189
    @pahtar7189 2 роки тому +1

    FYI: Mach 27 is orbital velocity, so the Russian Avangard is basically equivalent to a launch vehicle, meaning it's very large and expensive. Don't expect Russia to field many of them.

    • @dejanzdravkovic9010
      @dejanzdravkovic9010 Рік тому

      For USA one Poseidon is enough. Nuclear tsunami if you know what I mean?

  • @sujoybarua3907
    @sujoybarua3907 2 роки тому

    Hypersonic is the next form of all missiles from all launchers

  • @timothydodson557
    @timothydodson557 Рік тому

    Strategic mental defence.

  • @glennquagmire3258
    @glennquagmire3258 2 роки тому +8

    The proliferation of weapons that can not be thwarted is an excellent idea in keeping the peace. Especially if you put on nuclear tactical warheads like the BB-16.

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 2 роки тому

      Well that was the first stake between the us and Russia, pulling out of a nuclear treaty. The concept of mAD was in that no state would develop anti ballistic missile defenses.....but well, yk. Now there is a nuclear arms race, not in quantity but in delivery methods. The idea of both sides having weapons that can't be defended against will bring peace if the quantities are also limited. Unfortunately, both Russia and china already have defenses against hypersonics so let the arms race continue

  • @BabbyCat3008
    @BabbyCat3008 2 роки тому +32

    I bet the Indo-Russian Brahmos supersonic missile is more effective than the American hypersonic missile.

    • @jirachi-wishmaker9242
      @jirachi-wishmaker9242 2 роки тому +5

      🙄bakwaas kyun karte ho jab malum nahi hain kuch v

    • @jtcarroll123
      @jtcarroll123 2 роки тому

      Only one way to find out!

    • @suvch5842
      @suvch5842 2 роки тому +1

      True

    • @khojendra8832
      @khojendra8832 2 роки тому +5

      That's not true. American missiles are faster and better than Brahmos even though they pale in comparison to Russian missile.

    • @CryneseCoronaParty-
      @CryneseCoronaParty- 2 роки тому +13

      There is a difference between SuperSonic and HyperSonic. You either didn't watch the video properly or dont know the difference between the two.

  • @kamoteph273
    @kamoteph273 2 роки тому +1

    isn't these the same ships with not fireproof bridges? one fire incident is enough to melt the bridge. they better be careful when firing missiles

  • @rockyfjord3753
    @rockyfjord3753 2 роки тому +3

    Can that boat dive below the surface or is that just my imagination? The Zumwalt, Litterol, and Sea
    Hunter were all ideas from a white paper with hand drawings sent to Darpa circa 1997 titled
    'The Organic Battlefield.' Darpa is still developing ideas from that paper. The author was a homeless
    man.

    • @markfrost1375
      @markfrost1375 2 роки тому

      Can only ‘dive’ once sunk…the bow is the new wave piercer design …keeps ship leveller

    • @rockyfjord3753
      @rockyfjord3753 2 роки тому

      @@markfrost1375 Ok, thanks. I somehow thought somebody would design a surface ship that could at minimum, sail below the surface, but I guess with modern radars, it wouldn't be that stealthy anyhow.

  • @sublimmadem6027
    @sublimmadem6027 2 роки тому +13

    We love peace and continue to expect that peace prevails over the world but there is some group of countries that have different and petit interests in bullying and forcibly dominating other countries. This is dangerous and likely to invite nuclear war but they are least concerned with it. It makes the world think of another strong superpower so that the balance can be maintained. Else, the world is doomed now or sometimes in the near future.

    • @primepatriotone2443
      @primepatriotone2443 2 роки тому +1

      Name and shame the devils will you? We just want to check if all our answers are correct. 😁😁😁

    • @amareshroy7732
      @amareshroy7732 2 роки тому

      USA is a democratic nation. Putin Xi pin can develop more weapons at the cost of welfare of citizens.

    • @TheNoblot
      @TheNoblot 2 роки тому

      in war main media always lies since the truth is the first casualty of war / however brainwashing😶‍🌫️😫😨🥵is the first advantage of governments, hope you lot survive otherwise welcome to animal farm version BORIS JHONSON 🤑🤐🤑🤐🤣🙈🙉🙊🐒🐕‍🦺

  • @sanricklim7185
    @sanricklim7185 2 роки тому

    Star Wars vibe! Sailor with light sabers.

  • @organicrobot4710
    @organicrobot4710 2 роки тому +23

    Lets not act like the US hasnt had hypersonic capabilities since the 60s...if the US mentions military tech, theyve likely had it in their inventory for 20 years already...look up the "Sprint" missile system...MACH 10.

    • @rockyfjord3753
      @rockyfjord3753 2 роки тому +4

      US hasn't has sh*t in terms of hypersonic missiles. Stop believing video games are reality.

    • @kornbob2665
      @kornbob2665 2 роки тому +3

      USA is still behind Russia and China in Hypersonic Missile technology. The USA still failed in their latest Hypersonic Missile tests.

    • @phantom_rantom8489
      @phantom_rantom8489 2 роки тому +4

      @@rockyfjord3753 "ah yes totally tell the public our capabilities in military terms, our enemies totally won't take notes" believe it or not but this guy is actually stating a fact

    • @organicrobot4710
      @organicrobot4710 2 роки тому +1

      @@rockyfjord3753 Look up the US "Sprint missle" and when the US first deployed it, tells you all you need to know about their level tech...MACH 10.

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому +5

      Hahaha looks like Us is desperate to make itself look tough, what a shame 🙂

  • @geraldlevin5141
    @geraldlevin5141 2 роки тому +5

    However great the probability of a Russian nuclear attack (2-50%), NATO intervention is appropriate. WHY? The probability of a repeat invasion, of another state, with the SAME nuclear attack risk, is above 50%. A no-fly buffer of 25KM beyond Poland & Romanian borders can be maintained; with stand-off missiles (from NATO area)

  • @ericme5715
    @ericme5715 2 роки тому +2

    Are phele bolo unko hypersonic missiles bana to le tab laga lena destroyer mein😂

  • @crusaderclarkplays5466
    @crusaderclarkplays5466 2 роки тому +3

    Who ever hear or watch a video about US failure of Hypersonic missile. It's a bait to everyone and it will reach to the enemy how US are failed to make hypersonic missile. But US is very good at schemes and very wise Super power.

  • @johnnylim641
    @johnnylim641 2 роки тому

    Yeah, yeah...if the hypersonic missiles can even work.

  • @URBAN_Resistance
    @URBAN_Resistance 2 роки тому +3

    Did US successfully produce a hypersonic missle? Last time i read is the 3rd attemp of firing it failed

    • @abith_peter4317
      @abith_peter4317 2 роки тому +1

      They have many unlike india or north Korea they didn't show up in public..because chinese waiting to copy their data's 😂

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 2 роки тому

      An operational hypersonic LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) missile battery has already been delivered to the Army since October last year. But it wont be until next year at earliest that they deploy it to the front lines. The Navy will soon follow but its to big to fitted on current Arleigh Burke destroyers. Hence, it will be fitted on existing Zumwalt class and Virginia class subs and the future DDG(x). The Airforce have their own versions but it will still take some time for them. What keeps failing is the airforce one.

    • @sharumalavemi9845
      @sharumalavemi9845 2 роки тому

      @@abith_peter4317 Whaaatt..
      Chinese waiting to copy usa...🤔
      You must be kidding.
      Best Joke .. 👌

    • @abith_peter4317
      @abith_peter4317 2 роки тому +1

      @@sharumalavemi9845 yes that's not big joke they copy Russian, israel and US and other Europe tech and do copy cat things..in military

    • @xtinedavis5119
      @xtinedavis5119 2 роки тому

      @@sharumalavemi9845 lol most of chinese technologies were US/Japan knock off

  • @davidreynoso8593
    @davidreynoso8593 2 роки тому +1

    Great News 👍

  • @thanosave7112
    @thanosave7112 2 роки тому

    My opinion: in order to intercept these type of missiles usa could build a missiles which explodes and released a cloud of tiny missiles a mile wide . That could stop a hyposonic missile. this could be a great defense.

  • @AmarSingh-vb7lo
    @AmarSingh-vb7lo 2 роки тому +5

    First make a hypersonic missile ... 😂

  • @rubensoria7457
    @rubensoria7457 2 роки тому

    Excellent idea do it now

  • @425HP
    @425HP 2 роки тому

    Good thing they don't reveal how many missiles it will carry. Some people would be stupid enough to announce all the specifications to our enemies.

  • @kunal25roy
    @kunal25roy 2 роки тому +3

    But they have to develop that first right???

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому +1

      Failed 4 times and more to come

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 2 роки тому

      An operational hypersonic LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) missile battery has already been delivered to the Army since October last year. But it wont be until next year at earliest that they deploy it to the front lines. The Navy will soon follow but its to big to fitted on current Arleigh Burke destroyers. Hence, it will be fitted on existing Zumwalt class and Virginia class subs and the future DDG(x). The Airforce have their own versions but it will still take some time for them. What keeps failing is the airforce one.

    • @salilpanwar6922
      @salilpanwar6922 2 роки тому

      @@djajzkjljjfzzf7372 x-51 is a testbed you need to properly guide it and weaponise it as will.... is testbeds are the criteria then India has hypersonic missiles and lasers to destroy whole planes....

  • @ishaks8152
    @ishaks8152 2 роки тому

    Getting crazier.

  • @zen0432
    @zen0432 2 роки тому +13

    They don't even have a proper hypersonic missile😑

    • @thorodinson8755
      @thorodinson8755 2 роки тому +4

      last time I heard their hypersonic missile test failed... right?

    • @julienjeanmuller
      @julienjeanmuller 2 роки тому +2

      @The Original Hybrid says the Nation who denies almost every military assets they have. Only to declassify them 20 yrs later.

    • @amitmondal4976
      @amitmondal4976 2 роки тому +2

      Now they have when USA made a weapon it's looks very different from anyone it's like God mode on so I think USA made hypersonic missile will be better than china and Russ , that's my personal opinion though

    • @organicrobot4710
      @organicrobot4710 2 роки тому +1

      The US has had hypersonic missiles since the 60s...dont fool yourself.

    • @remohdude
      @remohdude 2 роки тому

      Gossipers in UA-cam is all over..Lol

  • @IAMAVIKJORDAN
    @IAMAVIKJORDAN 2 роки тому +2

    It isnt yet a couple of days that we got news of Russian using Hypersonic Missiles in Ukraine. USA did pick this up and now they are arming their ships with such missiles , Aren't they late ?

    • @dwanemarsh4378
      @dwanemarsh4378 2 роки тому +1

      Actually, they started "arming" some ships a few days after Russia attacked Ukraine. Some are already fully armed. But, they surely won't advertise it much!

  • @blackafrique3789
    @blackafrique3789 2 роки тому

    Ready to go

  • @modemstar7920
    @modemstar7920 2 роки тому

    Ok,but who is the manufacturer of the zumuwalt destroyers?

  • @spiritualawareness7736
    @spiritualawareness7736 2 роки тому

    The problem is that the PENTAGON says that they will have that capacity until at least 2025

  • @mukesh.r4043
    @mukesh.r4043 2 роки тому

    One is going to arm with hypersonic another is using it in battle field

  • @Truelust29
    @Truelust29 2 роки тому

    They have that?

  • @ricohernandez8800
    @ricohernandez8800 2 роки тому

    Is it the same that didn't work right? Couple times the NAVY tested and it was a failure

  • @malichase535
    @malichase535 2 роки тому

    I'm proud American, we're the best in the world in everything.

  • @seanavp
    @seanavp 2 роки тому

    *Most importantly - we have the missile technology.*

    • @GM-cq6ez
      @GM-cq6ez 2 роки тому

      So does russia.

    • @seanavp
      @seanavp 2 роки тому

      @@GM-cq6ez *And???*

    • @seanavp
      @seanavp 2 роки тому

      @@GM-cq6ez *Russia can't even handle Ukraine - how well will it do against all of Europe and the US?* *Russia is the dancing bear that will be tamed.*

  • @awequayzngs1780
    @awequayzngs1780 2 роки тому

    Still not in the pre- WW lll, when the WW III russian hypersonic missiles had its 1st shots !.

  • @silentwatcher1455
    @silentwatcher1455 2 роки тому +15

    Where will US get a real, working hypersonic missile?

    • @remohdude
      @remohdude 2 роки тому +12

      They never tell to their enemies. So sshhhhhhh..

    • @cv1683
      @cv1683 2 роки тому +2

      They already have although they say their under development or hve failed they may hold something u never know🤐

    • @cv1683
      @cv1683 2 роки тому +11

      Countries like india china north korea and russia having is ok but when u speak about usa country which is a step higher as always ... Keeps us thinking is usa really hiding something

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому +2

      Pffff very sad, west is full of lies👏🤡

    • @suvch5842
      @suvch5842 2 роки тому +2

      @@cv1683 AND INDIA OR RUSSIA CANNOT HIDE ANYTHING LOL......

  • @raishaferreira8099
    @raishaferreira8099 2 роки тому

    God bless ukania family and volunteers 🌎💛💙

  • @expertscreativity7571
    @expertscreativity7571 2 роки тому

    Make a video on US hypersonic missile tests.

  • @paoloangaroni1907
    @paoloangaroni1907 2 роки тому +1

    Against communism, United.. what a beautiful feeling..Beats!

  • @alexpalembang7665
    @alexpalembang7665 2 роки тому +2

    Wowwww so amazing. Would it be more lethal if the military equipments have Huawei 5G capability 😀

  • @sjv9147s
    @sjv9147s 2 роки тому

    All said, good. When?

  • @awequayzngs1780
    @awequayzngs1780 2 роки тому +2

    Escalation in the direction of the middle east as always !. History always repeat itself.

  • @yaboyed5779
    @yaboyed5779 Рік тому

    Didn’t they can the Zumwalts? Like they don’t even have ammo due to budgetary constraints.

  • @adambeaulieu6868
    @adambeaulieu6868 2 роки тому +1

    Put those destroyers at the bottom of the ocean. Problem Solved!

  • @againstviralmisinformation510
    @againstviralmisinformation510 2 роки тому +1

    First they have to successfully test one 😂😂

    • @williamsherman1942
      @williamsherman1942 2 роки тому

      We did, in the cold war. Merely a year and we’ll be in the top again

  • @andretempler
    @andretempler 2 роки тому

    Thank God 🙏

  • @skyemilk
    @skyemilk 2 роки тому

    Wow someone got spooked...

  • @WalkOverHotCoal
    @WalkOverHotCoal 2 роки тому +2

    It is my understanding that before this Zumwalt Class Destroyer could fire hyper-sonic missiles, it needs to have the missiles first. it is also my understanding that America doesn't have hyper-sonic missiles for quite some time yet. Two previous tests failed. my questions to CRUX are...
    (1). Where did it get the "exclusive" news?
    (2). Did America provide the "exclusive" news to CRUX?
    (3). If CRUX is indeed right, did America buy the missiles from Russia or China, or God forbidden, N Korea?

    • @waterof1465
      @waterof1465 2 роки тому +2

      i did some digging but the ones failed are US airforce hypersonic AGM-183 , currently the US has Dark Eagle for the army, they will probably turn that into a Navy Version. i maybe wrong tho.

  • @fadzilbastun392
    @fadzilbastun392 2 роки тому

    Zumwalt to get hypersonic weapons meaning DON'T HAVE THEM YET

  • @publictoilet7832
    @publictoilet7832 2 роки тому +1

    russia / china / north korea: showing our superpower every year parade..
    us: we dont need parade we allways win in every war 😂

  • @lshepherd5859
    @lshepherd5859 2 роки тому +1

    good , now send them immediately to the black sea for battle proven testing programme.

  • @lilacer6841
    @lilacer6841 2 роки тому +2

    they dont have these missiles yet apparrently?

  • @georgelewis2988
    @georgelewis2988 2 роки тому

    Yep, straight after they commission their Death Star.

  • @kafirmohallida8486
    @kafirmohallida8486 2 роки тому +3

    50 years from now...

  • @goodik4885
    @goodik4885 2 роки тому

    It's a good news. US- 💪💪

  • @LonWULF
    @LonWULF 2 роки тому +3

    I thought they (USA) don't have hypersonic missiles 🤔

    • @jabiraxmed7898
      @jabiraxmed7898 2 роки тому +1

      They dont have . War head is easy part dont spread a fake news

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 2 роки тому

      Virtual ones in MetaVerse.

    • @apex_blue
      @apex_blue 2 роки тому

      I mean look at the Sprint Missile. The US has had the technology for decades it just had no reason to until recently.

  • @ronaldrosen6472
    @ronaldrosen6472 2 роки тому

    The fitting of hypersonic missiles should have occured years ago. Russia didn't wait or ask the USA for permission to fit hypersonic missiles on its ships.

  • @karlsalomon1723
    @karlsalomon1723 2 роки тому +3

    I remember during Syrian war two Russian warships in the Caspian sea fire cruise missiles to hit target in Syria, the west were surprise and their media crunk up propaganda that some of this missile has fallen down somewhere in Iran that kill some goat,

    • @haroldbell213
      @haroldbell213 2 роки тому

      Damn those goats get in the way ever time

  • @colemeeker908
    @colemeeker908 2 роки тому

    Interesting. We have 2 zumwalts and the class was cancelled

  • @Mundo-bn2ho
    @Mundo-bn2ho 2 роки тому +1

    I didn' t know the US had any? Were they designed and manufactured in 1 week?

    • @williamsherman1942
      @williamsherman1942 2 роки тому

      We had them in the cold war, they were called minutemen III. They went very very fast, the Soviets were terrified of them,

    • @Mundo-bn2ho
      @Mundo-bn2ho 2 роки тому

      @@williamsherman1942 Minuteman were ICBM's

    • @williamsherman1942
      @williamsherman1942 2 роки тому

      @@Mundo-bn2ho It might’ve not been hypersonic missiles, but they were very fast and showed that we Americans knew how missiles worked. I doubt that we’ve simply forgotten how to create missiles lmao

  • @vinmarusop5592
    @vinmarusop5592 2 роки тому

    Very very good nice weapons

  • @abuhasanali2270
    @abuhasanali2270 2 роки тому

    bless to all hero👍😔

  • @nickblanchard1629
    @nickblanchard1629 2 роки тому

    All aluminum ship? Yea right! They can’t make it across the Mediterranean Sea without being sunk due to flaws in the ship design.
    Any new destroyer with an even number is all aluminum. It has many flaws in it.
    They were built in Mobile, Al. By Austal ship building.

  • @Palms2020
    @Palms2020 2 роки тому

    When did the US get hypersonics?

  • @user-fy4xx8uv9o
    @user-fy4xx8uv9o 2 роки тому +9

    Who knows why this miracle ship has never approached our Russian shores?
    Or is it a ship for combat protection of coastal waters?

  • @rodalonso7805
    @rodalonso7805 2 роки тому +1

    Here for the music😎🤷‍♂️

  • @marinamostert6870
    @marinamostert6870 2 роки тому

    Super human brains, use your talents to better human exsistence

  • @dloui5214
    @dloui5214 Рік тому +1

    true ! and will fully operational in 2050

  • @romeoiipunzalan1079
    @romeoiipunzalan1079 2 роки тому

    Honestly 3 ships? Even if this ship teleported to the battlefield 3 ships still wont be enough... to win a fight..

  • @utkarshdubey5393
    @utkarshdubey5393 2 роки тому +6

    Us has not even tested the hypersonic missile how they will armed it with warships.

    • @redtum4845
      @redtum4845 2 роки тому +2

      when it comes to technology dude they are far ahead from the two, consider the HLTV conducted by darpa and Boeing X51 waverider

    • @utkarshdubey5393
      @utkarshdubey5393 2 роки тому +3

      @@redtum4845 what's the point of technology when they can't use in practical combat role.

    • @JACKAL747
      @JACKAL747 2 роки тому +1

      How do you know? Do you not know the USA is the most secretive about its Weapon systems? Only an idiot would think otherwise

    • @redtum4845
      @redtum4845 2 роки тому +2

      @@utkarshdubey5393 they are intended to be strategic bomb, chinese hypersonics missed its target 20 miles from the intended, you can watch sandboxx for more infro

  • @drsiva6618
    @drsiva6618 2 роки тому

    Good move but they also must destroy theirs and never make them again, including nukes and all destroyers

  • @congresswallah
    @congresswallah 2 роки тому

    Goodness gracious, now what is this? Captain Nemos Nautilus

  • @patrickoruko6238
    @patrickoruko6238 2 роки тому

    PUT THEM THERE FAST, AND LET PUTIN KNOW.!

  • @rathindrasarkar3238
    @rathindrasarkar3238 2 роки тому

    US hypersonic missile ! Wait for ten years.

  • @QasimAli-to5lk
    @QasimAli-to5lk 2 роки тому +4

    The zumwalt isn't even operational

    • @julienjeanmuller
      @julienjeanmuller 2 роки тому +1

      That's what they been telling since its inception. But if you're familiar with this type of BS, whenever they deny something, it means they been there done that. So wait another 10 yrs to find out, following a movie about the very tech they say they didn't exist. That's the US military in a nutshell.

  • @otogiritobi1342
    @otogiritobi1342 2 роки тому

    When i look at this beautiful ship the one thing i notice is How big it's eyebrows are 3:26 so pretty. 🤗🤗

  • @bibhanshu82
    @bibhanshu82 2 роки тому +6

    What I had heard in News was US didn't had hyper sonic missiles. So may be this is Hollywood movie?

    • @emersonwaminal9164
      @emersonwaminal9164 2 роки тому

      Hahah they will test it in your country and don't blaim them of weapons of mass distraction...

  • @lunafringe10
    @lunafringe10 2 роки тому +1

    dont look too good for a country when it lost 9 out of 10 wars,

  • @YemposMengAnalyst
    @YemposMengAnalyst 2 роки тому

    Time to fight Russia, this is great ship

  • @reynaldapuya3439
    @reynaldapuya3439 2 роки тому

    They didn't even succeed on making one.. hehe their last test of hypersonic missile was in Dec. 15, 2021 and it failed..

  • @shyguy2021
    @shyguy2021 2 роки тому

    Here we goooo.... *The MORE The MERRIER*
    😅😂🤣

  • @barok7428
    @barok7428 2 роки тому

    Why not create a weapon that can jammed systems and disrupt fly path of a hyper Sonic missiles... it's like creating one nuclear bomb in the 70's where Russian bombs even in a thousand became obsolete in an instance

  • @natoya85
    @natoya85 2 роки тому

    Sending it to Ukraine 🇺🇦 meeting with Putin?

  • @rudiechinchilla6746
    @rudiechinchilla6746 2 роки тому +2

    The US was established by God himself by freedom and democratic values, as is my country: Costa Rica , and the US keeps ´s the balance in the world. Now with this War on, it s just an awakening that they have to keep up their role in World s affairs

    • @brunodrivel2487
      @brunodrivel2487 2 роки тому

      master race? we had one before that belived that.

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 2 роки тому

      The Crack Cocaine in your country Costa Rica must be super pure. You don't want to overdo it amigo.