How The U.S. Fell Behind In Hypersonic Technology

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 тра 2024
  • Hypersonic air travel is anything that travels at Mach 5, or five times the speed of sound. The U.S. was once a leader in developing supersonic and hypersonic technology, but has taken "our foot off the gas," according to Mark Lewis, executive director of the National Defense Industrial Association's Emerging Technologies Institute.
    Watch the video to find out more about how the U.S. fell behind Russia, China and possibly North Korea, and how we're spending billions to catch up.
    Hypersonic air travel, for both military and commercial use, could be here within the decade.
    The $770 billion National Defense Authorization Act signed into law Tuesday calls for investing billions into hypersonic research and development, making them a top priority for Washington. The next step is congressional approval to allocate the money for the technology to the Pentagon.
    “If you are traveling at hypersonic speeds, you’re, you’re going more than a mile per second,” said Mark Lewis, executive director of the National Defense Industrial Association’s Emerging Technologies Institute. “That’s important for military applications. It could have commercial applications. It could also open up new, new ways of reaching space.”
    Hypersonic is anything traveling above Mach 5, or five times the speed of sound. That’s roughly 3,800 mph. At those speeds, commercial planes could travel from New York to London in under two hours.
    Significant hypersonic research and development in recent years have highlighted its promising opportunity, but it’s also shed light on its destructive potential. According to Rand Corp., hypersonic technology creates a new class of threat that could change the nature of warfare.
    “There truly is a sense of concern that we are in a race,” said Lewis, who is a former director at the Department of Defense. “We took our foot off the gas. … There are other nations, peer competitors, who are investing very, very heavily in hypersonics.”
    China, Russia and now North Korea all claim to have developed and successfully tested hypersonic missiles. Unlike traditional ballistic missiles that follow a set trajectory after launch, hypersonic weapons are maneuverable in flight, incredibly fast and hard to detect.
    The U.S. doesn’t have operational hypersonic missiles yet, but it’s a top priority for Washington. According to the Government Accountability Office, funding for hypersonic research increased by 740% between 2015 and 2020. The latest defense budget alone increased funding by 20%.
    “It’s truly a bipartisan issue,” said Lewis.
    The DOD is gathering data across multiple agencies, industry leaders and academia as it races to fast-track production on its first hypersonic missile by September 2022.
    “We don’t want to just match them missile for missile, but introduce new capabilities of transportation capabilities, sensor capabilities. And I’m seeing that play out,” Lewis told CNBC.
    » Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
    » Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
    » Subscribe to CNBC Classic: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCclassic
    About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
    Connect with CNBC News Online
    Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
    Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
    #CNBC
    How The U.S. Fell Behind In Hypersonic Technology

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,4 тис.

  • @mrdoerp
    @mrdoerp 2 роки тому +111

    "Journalist" : what do you think?
    Raytheon CEO : I think i need more money

    • @ericlane3256
      @ericlane3256 2 роки тому

      Money does make the world go round.

    • @MrJustin259
      @MrJustin259 2 роки тому

      @@ericlane3256 eventually it becomes worthless

  • @papajohnsuk5965
    @papajohnsuk5965 2 роки тому +1259

    You know what would make any flight "feel" hypersonic, if you didn't have to go through security & check in for 2-3 hours

    • @youngbuck12
      @youngbuck12 2 роки тому +86

      Thanks Osama 🙄

    • @abdiganiaden
      @abdiganiaden 2 роки тому +65

      @@youngbuck12 osama wanted to cause inconvenience for the west and he technically won.
      Turned an entire civilization into whimps untrusting of each other.

    • @marvvelous6773
      @marvvelous6773 2 роки тому +2

      You mad ?

    • @abcdedfg8340
      @abcdedfg8340 2 роки тому +16

      Security would take longer than the flight lol

    • @wizzotizzo
      @wizzotizzo 2 роки тому +6

      But you know why this is the way that it is, right?

  • @micesserono2966
    @micesserono2966 2 роки тому +226

    When you spend more than any other country and still lack behind, the money is not the problem.

    • @benthekeeshond545
      @benthekeeshond545 2 роки тому +18

      The problem is the people who pocketed the money. We all knew about that since President Eisenhower but couldn't do a thing. No politicians dare to challenge the system. I think President Kennedy tried but paid the ultimate price with his ..........

    • @maximme
      @maximme 2 роки тому +21

      @@benthekeeshond545 you hit the nail on the head with this one.
      Kennedy tried to reverse the situation
      and
      take back the power from the military complex.

    • @TheTrueUSPatriot
      @TheTrueUSPatriot 2 роки тому +19

      The U.S. is not falling behind, though. Hypersonic missiles will be rendered useless by directed energy weapons, which is what we've been focusing on. This is nothing more than propaganda meant to increase the defense budget. Our military just happens to focus on other areas.

    • @rareselnino6224
      @rareselnino6224 2 роки тому +6

      @@TheTrueUSPatriot
      I heard this year US is going to release a 100 kw laser, but I don't know if it can track and destroy hypersonic missiles.

    • @backintimealwyn5736
      @backintimealwyn5736 2 роки тому +8

      meh ; if you had fallen behind you would'nt be advertizing your strategic failures on mainstream media. You're going to be alright ,just stop starting wars everywhere please.

  • @WinyPouh
    @WinyPouh 2 роки тому +63

    0:35 "Russia or China, possibly experimenting with hypersonic technology" Russia already have hypersonic rockets in service. Wake up.

    • @oBCHANo
      @oBCHANo 2 роки тому +4

      If you believe russian state media then sure they do.

    • @bobyford8051
      @bobyford8051 2 роки тому +30

      @@oBCHANo If you believe american state media then sure they don't.

    • @rui9590
      @rui9590 2 роки тому +1

      @@bobyford8051 guess you believe in every putins words smh

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 2 роки тому +2

      Zircons aren’t really “in service”. They produced some, but the missile is still in testing and hasn’t yet reached IOC.

    • @ozymandias7592
      @ozymandias7592 2 роки тому +1

      Not yet. there are some but not full scale production.

  • @rhino6285
    @rhino6285 2 роки тому +550

    How did the US fall behind in hypersonic technology?
    Answer: By spending 5 trillion dollars on Iraq and Afghanistan that's how

    • @mudshovel289
      @mudshovel289 2 роки тому +11

      Yup

    • @nirajshrestha5621
      @nirajshrestha5621 2 роки тому +14

      Well Us also took most of the resources and hold the money that belong to Afghan normal people. I guess resources they took covered most of the cost the spent

    • @redscorpio81
      @redscorpio81 2 роки тому +52

      To be more precise, we didn’t spend that money “on” those countries, but rather on destroying them.

    • @ironheard227
      @ironheard227 2 роки тому +4

      @@nirajshrestha5621 yes but that's all going to corrupts hand.not people but defend budgets are people mony.

    • @user-gy2xk4ot8f
      @user-gy2xk4ot8f 2 роки тому +16

      No. The USA has lost a scientific and engineering school. Science is based on industry, and in the USA 80% of GDP is financial services. The USA prints dollars, issues treasuries, mortgage bonds. Over the past 10 years, the entire growth of the economy is an increase in the value of the stock market as a result of quantitative easing. And the electronics industry in Hong Kong and Taiwan, the Boeing design center moved to Moscow and makes 70% of all components for aircraft there. Ford and General Motors in Mexico and Canada assemble cars from Japanese components on universal Japanese platforms.

  • @ILDG86
    @ILDG86 2 роки тому +781

    Having an annual defence budget of $750 billion apparently isn't enough to satisfy the beast.

    • @MelaninMagdalene
      @MelaninMagdalene 2 роки тому +138

      With capitalism being what it is, most of that is pocketed

    • @3boud84
      @3boud84 2 роки тому +30

      @@MelaninMagdalene facts

    • @MelaninMagdalene
      @MelaninMagdalene 2 роки тому +47

      @@3boud84
      9/11 the case of the missing trillions from the Pentagon is still open.
      A tech guy quit his job at the pentagon, saying they’d rather invest in F-35s, than infrastructure that produces engineers to keep up.
      Math Olympics China wins first place. Number two is won by imported Chinese-Americans

    • @freddiecoulson7202
      @freddiecoulson7202 2 роки тому +20

      the problem is, its hand strung by politicians cancelling projects they know nothing about. there's also not enough vertical integration

    • @MelaninMagdalene
      @MelaninMagdalene 2 роки тому +14

      @@freddiecoulson7202
      Politicians are lawyers that go from corporate boards to politics back to corporate boards, back to politics-while you’re not taught civics or law as a prerequisite, & the senate is full of power driven old men, that could have retired after a term and made 6 figures for life. Greedy for organs to stay alive, while the young people begging to lick their boots are greedy for money

  • @toovexx4113
    @toovexx4113 2 роки тому +37

    With the amount of money we’re spending we have no excuse for falling behind.

    • @charles8769
      @charles8769 2 роки тому +1

      You do because money spent in the US =/= money spent in China. Power purchasing parity must be factored in AKA a single US army soldiers pay could pay 5-8 Russian or Chinese soldiers.
      A shipyard in Shanghai will make the same ship but for much less money than in Virginia.
      Add on that the maintenance the US needs while China doesn’t have anything to maintain yet.

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 2 роки тому

      that's the price of having the strongest army in the world.

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 2 роки тому +1

      @Brent Morrison America is the world police, America makes sure peace exists if it wasn't for America war would still exist in the middle east. except for Yemen of course, america have contributed a lot of peace in the world. america deserve noble peace price.

    • @myopicthunder
      @myopicthunder 2 роки тому +6

      US taxpayers are getting robbed blind, it's ridiculous.

    • @fynkozari9271
      @fynkozari9271 2 роки тому +3

      Dont worry, there are many other things USA is falling behind.

  • @itinensanzen
    @itinensanzen 2 роки тому +19

    The only country that possesses hypersonic missiles deployed just used them in war for the first time in history 2 days ago.

    • @Smashachu
      @Smashachu 2 роки тому

      Those missile defeat the entire purpose of what a hypersonic missile does over a conventional ballistics rocket. It flies on a fixes path which allows it to be intercepted by defenses. We're designing maneuverable hypersonic missiles that will disguise their trajectory until the last second and evade missile defenses. It was just a show of power "hey look at us were threatening we have old soviet area technology we slapped together and called it a hypersonic missile"

    • @itinensanzen
      @itinensanzen 2 роки тому +1

      @Travis Kern I keep what i said and i reject any oppinion of western dumbed down clows.

    • @kamabokogompachiro5368
      @kamabokogompachiro5368 2 роки тому +6

      @@Smashachu they used hypersonic to target an underground depot unreachable by conventional missiles. They arent stupid to throw that stuff around

  • @ericp1139
    @ericp1139 2 роки тому +238

    In other words, defense contractors want more money.

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 2 роки тому +8

      shhh, shh NO! That's not it.
      YOU need more protection.

    • @witscorpian
      @witscorpian 2 роки тому +5

      Give me contract... I will give you hypersonic Weapons...

    • @afiqhazwan97
      @afiqhazwan97 2 роки тому +1

      No. They want to give you more FREEDOM.

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 2 роки тому +1

      This is real, not a “mineshaft gap” moment. Budgets aren’t going up, money is just being reallocated, which has been made a lot easier now that Afghanistan isn’t a problem anymore.

    • @bobbyc.1111
      @bobbyc.1111 2 роки тому

      stupid of them because if us goes down they will to no matter who wins. If we were under china they woudn't have as much freedom orpay or positions

  • @SvenPiper
    @SvenPiper 2 роки тому +341

    The fact that the U.S. is falling behind in more and more high-tech areas is due to rampant corruption. The U.S. has the world's most expensive health care system and one of the worst. The U.S. spends the most on defense, but other countries use their resources more efficiently.

    • @CausticLemons7
      @CausticLemons7 2 роки тому +18

      Won't someone think of the contractors?!

    • @changeyouryoutubechannelna1434
      @changeyouryoutubechannelna1434 2 роки тому +14

      No they are simply allocating military budget into other sectors lol they will be the first to have a sixth gen fighter in a couple years while the closest country (an ally UK) is 12 years behind

    • @dannyzero692
      @dannyzero692 2 роки тому +34

      A military that is supplied by privately owned corporations is bound to have extra cost due to bureaucracy.

    • @ryen49
      @ryen49 2 роки тому +6

      @Ilhan Abdullahi Omar uhh no lol

    • @TrungNguyen-uf8cv
      @TrungNguyen-uf8cv 2 роки тому +13

      Not exactly corruption, but lack of focus, stemming from fighting insurgency for so long. key technologies are all over the place but no one cared to focus on building hypersonic missiles until recent years

  • @nickhimaras9331
    @nickhimaras9331 2 роки тому +97

    I remember all the times in US History, since the 50s when the US allegedly "..fell behind.." in some defense technology or another. The first one was the nuclear "missile gap" with the Soviet Union in the Eisenhower presidency. It was indeed a huge gap...in favor of the US.
    All these "falling behinds" are usually early attempts at an arms race in the particular technology, you know, huge defense spending increases.

    • @aka_pierre
      @aka_pierre 2 роки тому +4

      I'm pretty sure that the hypersonics that our peers have developed are too large to mount conventional warheads, meaning that they are going to be limited to being used for nuclear weapons. Which means that, realistically, they are pointless. This is just an answer to the US's THAAD missile shield.

    • @neffosnine2970
      @neffosnine2970 2 роки тому +9

      @@aka_pierre 🤣🤣🤣 blah blah blah ... :)) Saigon smile 😁
      🤣🤣🤣 blah blah blah ... :)) Taliban smile 😁
      p.s. From Mother-Russia with Love! 😎 👌

    • @nickl5658
      @nickl5658 2 роки тому +3

      @@aka_pierre Correct. They are in response to the US missile shield in an attempt to maintain MAD. Else the US could nuke both China and Russia and shoot down all their replying nukes, making nuclear war a viable option for victory.

    • @gabemendoza1052
      @gabemendoza1052 2 роки тому +3

      @@nickl5658
      Except there are UFOs capable of shutting down nuclear power. There's that to worry about.

    • @titoyama5760
      @titoyama5760 2 роки тому

      @@gabemendoza1052 exactly and no government are claiming those UFOs who knows what they are capable of

  • @petrolhead2955
    @petrolhead2955 2 роки тому +104

    For those who are interested, the latest development of Chinese Hypersonic Technology: scientists have invented a cooling mechanism of infrared sensors which allow them to operate under the immense heat of hypersonic flight. Imagine a heat-seeking hypersonic AA missile or dual guidance anti-CV ballistic missile, could be a game changer.

    • @smeep7870
      @smeep7870 2 роки тому +9

      seems sketch how would anything possible get rid of the plasma sheathing on the missle?

    • @Sambo169
      @Sambo169 2 роки тому +4

      Obama didn't do nothing for our military! Biden is the same!

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 2 роки тому +12

      Not actually real. HGVs have plasma sheathing which makes IR impossible, hence why HGVs like the Chinese DF-21D have to decelerate in their terminal phase to supersonic speeds in order for them to use terminal guidance.

    • @donaldrobinson214
      @donaldrobinson214 2 роки тому +4

      @@Sambo169 if Obama didn't do nothing then that means that he did do something, at least he got Bin Laden under his watch and he was big on taking out Targets in Afghanistan with drones

    • @Frohicky1
      @Frohicky1 2 роки тому

      Turning circle: two continents.

  • @npc2480
    @npc2480 2 роки тому +441

    I think we need to increase our military budget again next year because apparently, $768 billion isn’t enough.

    • @TechLiberator
      @TechLiberator 2 роки тому +130

      Until you go bankrupt like the romans.

    • @hangender
      @hangender 2 роки тому +57

      libs keep increasing military budget and then say "how come we can't afford woke social spending bill when we spend 768b on military?" lul

    • @chinesesparrows
      @chinesesparrows 2 роки тому +7

      Socialism for the contractors which could be more efficient, but at least defense has a clear output not a fleeting feeling of spoiled satisfaction

    • @npc2480
      @npc2480 2 роки тому +82

      @@hangender left, right, media…..they are all owned by the military industrial complex.

    • @Dennisaj
      @Dennisaj 2 роки тому +1

      Jimmy Dore said it best

  • @wtf_usa5597
    @wtf_usa5597 2 роки тому +80

    So funny to see the CEO of Raytheon warning about "how far behind we are". So I guess 2023's military budgets will be $1T+, but we still won't have Health Care or shelter for the homeless.

    • @LegendNinja41
      @LegendNinja41 2 роки тому +18

      yup, this is a PR Piece, paid for.

    • @megadunsparce5735
      @megadunsparce5735 2 роки тому +2

      Bruh You Already Know America Spends Over $1T On The Military Yearly For A Long Time Now!

    • @blackhole9961
      @blackhole9961 2 роки тому +6

      You do realize america spends over 3 trillion on healthcare annually right?
      This year in 2021 it just spent over 4 trillion, America has always spent more money on healthcare than it has its own military.

    • @rexxon1611
      @rexxon1611 2 роки тому +3

      @@blackhole9961 You are good in twisting fact...

    • @blackhole9961
      @blackhole9961 2 роки тому +5

      @@rexxon1611 people like you seem to cutting defense spending will solve the problem when it really won’t. America basically spends 4x the amount on healthcare than it does it’s own military. What is cutting military spending going to do? Definitely won’t get you free healthcare anytime soon.

  • @markvelber8664
    @markvelber8664 2 роки тому +15

    Not just hypersonic but in many’s things quite behind China and Russia.

    • @neffosnine2970
      @neffosnine2970 2 роки тому +1

      🤣🤣🤣 blah blah blah ... :)) Saigon smile 😁
      🤣🤣🤣 blah blah blah ... :)) Taliban smile 😁
      p.s. From Mother-Russia with Love! 😎 👌

    • @Rhine0Cowboy
      @Rhine0Cowboy 2 роки тому +1

      The US already has operational hypersonic missile systems while Russia is still quietly hiding the failures of their non-operational offensive hypersonic missile system. Putin should just go back to invading sovereign countries on Russia's border while crying about needing security guarantees (==sovereignity) for Russia. What a clown.

  • @westews6061
    @westews6061 2 роки тому +17

    I have a friend who started his PhD at 23 2 years ago fully paid for and this is what he works on and when China and Russia announced they had it, it was very alarming

    • @kennethg374
      @kennethg374 2 роки тому +9

      Your friend is going to be working a lot of overtime for the next few months considering Russia just used a hypersonic missile on a Ukrainian ammunition’s depot.

    • @milanradovanovic3693
      @milanradovanovic3693 2 роки тому +3

      @@kennethg374 I think that USA doesnt lack the knowledge for hypersonic, but DoD is late in the game for like 2 decades. Takes time from lab prototypes to combat vehicles to arm them with hypersonic. US announced first land based systems in late 23, in 2025 on ships and 2028 on subs. This was strategic mistake of DoD and goverment. There 2 major issues with hypersonic. Materials that can withstand those extreme heat and manuvearing at those extreme speed. But anyhow I think that issue now for US and Russia and China is not hypersonic, US lags but it Will eventually get them but it is the question of space weapon... And I can only presume that this is US goverment major worry, cause Russia and China are probably already into that well ahead

    • @thierrymartin997
      @thierrymartin997 2 роки тому +2

      @@milanradovanovic3693 2 decades is a minimum.. it's too late to recover it. This is very alarming.

    • @blackhand8299
      @blackhand8299 2 роки тому

      @@thierrymartin997 I mean China catched up to the U.S which arguably is more than 20 years behind. The U.S can do what China has been doing since forever... Steal their technology, for once they have something worthwhile to steal other than cheap knockoffs.

    • @thierrymartin997
      @thierrymartin997 2 роки тому +3

      @@milanradovanovic3693 The Russian don't use very high temperature material. This another technology undermining by r US intelligence. The guy who resolved what made the US stopping the research, was also undermining by his country . Russia under Soviet regime was the country which have continued to investigate this technology because the man in charge at the research board was the one who in the 60 discovered the impossibility. . Therefore when the publication was published in 1983. , The USA was under a former Hollywood cowboy just good enough to announced a star Wars military research, to stress the Kremlin. But the Soviets saw with the publication a very good opportunity to invest. When in the 90 the USA was the number one in the world,. The objective to make a Star Wars was cancelled. When Putin was elected he has to face a poor country to rebuilt. No way to invest the amount of US military budget.to build a huge arsenal. In fact from old weapons Russia could only update with some modifications. Of course new material were discovered and the computing power was able to compute in order to master the next technology Putin announced in 2018. Trump who met Putin understood Russia was not a second class country in weapons. He eventually increased the budget to new technology. But it takes a decade to find a new approach. So far the MHD was used to reduce fuselage visibility on radar. The hypersonic missile was not a priority because the existence of some hypersonic missiles like patriot was enough cast to destroy a attach made from competitive weapons. For few seconds the missile can teach 6000km/h at High altitude. The Russian MHD used a totally different approach using highly magnetic field from solid combustible with Cesium gas . Then a special matrix electrical circuit around the fuselage organised the distribution of the magnetic field used to constrain the ionised gas covering the missile as shown on video in Ukraine showing hypersonic missile with gloomy aspects flying at low altitude . This technology make it possible to fly at 14000 km/h at sea level. But the most serious concern is able to fly up to 2000 miles at 12000km/h and able to destroy an aircraft carrier with one shot .All the Navy fleet can be destroyed today/!!! And this technology is as well used under water. The USA can sell weapons to Ukraine but this will not charge the issue of the conflict. Biden has realised Ukraine is lost. NATO is over whatever the Occidental press is telling because no US soldiers will take part of this regional war. Europe has no army excepted France with only 80000 soldiers. The others armies have no military brains because Washington decides always for them. . Therefore Biden is trying to move forward in the Asia region. His mistake is to defend a territory belonging to China against China. China has the hypersonic technology too. This is Very bad period just after the Covid to push Zelensky to declare an attach against russophones in Ukraine . The military forces are not prepared to fight against missiles capable to destroy the Navy in minutes because no weapons can't stop them....

  • @thetreekeeper143
    @thetreekeeper143 2 роки тому +31

    Hopefully we increase the budget to about 3 trillion dollars. Thats for American security. Printer goes Brrrrrrrrrr

    • @harrisn3693
      @harrisn3693 2 роки тому

      Or you get raided by your own military to pay for jobs in the defense sector..

    • @briant5685
      @briant5685 2 роки тому

      yeah to keep them bellies full

  • @NebulaIsTaken
    @NebulaIsTaken 2 роки тому +74

    >spends hundreds of billions of dollars on military
    >still falling behind other nations spending a fraction of the money

    • @anomalianomali5080
      @anomalianomali5080 2 роки тому +2

      if calculated from PPP and R&D, it is likely that China has a larger budget than the US, China's budget doesn't include R&D.

    • @5gnetsolutions876
      @5gnetsolutions876 2 роки тому

      Too much spent on Wars and all the equipment stupid US leaves behind.
      Biden says... huh?

    • @lukemurray4950
      @lukemurray4950 2 роки тому +7

      @@anomalianomali5080 Chian R&D budget is $378 billion. Military budget is $252 billion. That adds up to $630 billion. Still significantly less than the US and the US don't include of its R&D funding in their military budget. if it did it would be in the trillions.
      American tax payer gets ripped off big time! Everything all the the way down to gloves are more expensive because these companies charge what they want and the government just pays it.

    • @ericlane3256
      @ericlane3256 2 роки тому

      As a whole we’re not falling behind, but in certain areas like Cyber and hypersonic, yes we are.

    • @lukemurray4950
      @lukemurray4950 2 роки тому +3

      @@ericlane3256 also AI, robotics, anti ship and anti air missiles. Main battle tanks (if Russia can afford it. It's a lot more areas and more key areas than you think.

  • @toffanful
    @toffanful 2 роки тому +29

    Had Bush-the -Lesser not pulled out from all arms control agreements on nuclear weapons as Russia practically begged them not to do, Russia would not have had to protect itself by developing hypersonic weapons. They now lead the world in this research with a defense budget 1/20th as large as the US.

    • @tarjotdhanoa7367
      @tarjotdhanoa7367 2 роки тому

      Because china was already having all kind of arsenal. So it doesnt make sense to stay when your one foe is soo advanced

    • @Airdrifting
      @Airdrifting 2 роки тому +8

      @@tarjotdhanoa7367 Is it Chinese fault when US is threatening China with 25x more nuclear weapons plus missile defense systems? Did China put its military bases next to US and armed them with missile defense systems?

    • @tarjotdhanoa7367
      @tarjotdhanoa7367 2 роки тому +1

      @@Airdrifting being prepared for a war is the best way to stop the war from happening and that's what usa have been doing to china and that's what is happening between Russia and usa. China is controlling south china sea , Tibet. And making African countries into debt trap just Britishers did in colonial era . And usa is worried about china because of Taiwan. Because China wants to invade it. China occupied Hong Kong completely and now people are loosing their freedom . If you think china is that good then why don't you start living in China and come up with some experience after a decade or so

    • @ericlane3256
      @ericlane3256 2 роки тому +3

      Russia spends much more on defense than the public numbers suggest.

    • @jeffjohnson5053
      @jeffjohnson5053 2 роки тому

      The Evil democrats completely ignored China!! I was living in Asia 15 years ago. The news there already reported that china built an air tunnel to test and build their hypersonic weapons. Of course, the USA did nothing. The US is always late and waits until it falls behind! 15 years ago, china has already begun building on the islands in South China seas. Of course , no one did nothing and the Evil USA liberal news refuses to report it!!

  • @thegrimmer
    @thegrimmer 2 роки тому +35

    Weird that CNBC would have defense industry advertisers and then fear monger the public about how we need a new arms race with Russia and China. Didn't see that one coming. Cheers to the journalist using the word "nucular" in honor of GW.

    • @lukemurray4950
      @lukemurray4950 2 роки тому +1

      There is a whole lot of war mongering going on right now and most people don't see it. These companies will not stop until they have war, a war them or their family will not be fighting and dying in.

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 2 роки тому

      lol, yes.

    • @VashtheStampede007
      @VashtheStampede007 2 роки тому +2

      The warmongering elites control not only most of the mainstream media, social media, etc. information platforms, but they also control all those so-called NGOs including so many “human rights” groups. They keep pushing for propaganda to prepare the general public for more wars... 💁‍♂️
      For example, the most recent tension with China is based on the accusation of “genocide”. But the very first organization who came up with the “one million in the concentration camps” accusation, is a US-funded group called “World Uyghur Congress”. The chairman of this group was a former employee of Radio Free Asia, another propaganda outlet funded by the US government. The World Uyghur Congress got all their funding from NED (a CIA civilian arm who took over the funding operations), you can find the funding receipt on the NED website 🤦‍♂️.

    • @VashtheStampede007
      @VashtheStampede007 2 роки тому +1

      It did not stop there. A German immigrant, (Adrian Zenz) from another US-funded group “Victims of Communism” came up with the “genocide”, “mass r @pe”, “mass sterilization”, etc. accusations. He claims he was sent by God to destroy CCP. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • @VashtheStampede007
      @VashtheStampede007 2 роки тому +2

      Then the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) came up with the so-called satellite images of “concentration camps”... ASPI is entirely funded by the US arms industry. The 300+ “camps” were really just schools, warehouses, prisons, etc. And the one who found them was a part-time 19-year-old...using Google earth 💩

  • @SeekerofTruth2007
    @SeekerofTruth2007 2 роки тому +253

    It amazes me how far technology can go in my life time.

    • @garymccann2960
      @garymccann2960 2 роки тому +3

      The Bibke said knowledge would explode in the end times.

    • @MelaninMagdalene
      @MelaninMagdalene 2 роки тому +3

      Killing and controlling people is the height of science

    • @Sciurus
      @Sciurus 2 роки тому

      The real scary stuff are the things you dont hear about... like whatever Commander Fravor saw loaded up with smaller drone versions carrying nuclear warheads... 🛸🚀☢💣💥 only thing faster would be teleporting it!
      Check out William Lyne's interview or his book Occult Ether Physics. We've never seen what direction Victor Shauberger's repulsine engine research evolution went either... they probably have whole classes of natural phenomena that are off limits for civilians to work with that are classified military use only only technologies from nuclear transmutation to manipulation of the sub hydrogen elements of Walter Russell and a bunch of other occulted topics like Nicola Tesla's dynamical theory of Gravity and other topics having to do with the æther... else why even name a defense company something like "Hermeus" lol! 🤔💭💡

    • @enveloreal
      @enveloreal 2 роки тому +4

      @@MelaninMagdalene Yes, it is. We are only pressured to improve if our lives depend on it. Survival of the fittest will always apply.

    • @rui9590
      @rui9590 2 роки тому +3

      Not that much technology, recent years have been a decline considering early 2000’s. We are slowing innovation

  • @Deltanorth86
    @Deltanorth86 2 роки тому +37

    They fell behind hypersonic research but they have the largest military budget in the world? 😂😂 bunch of corrupt thieves in the pentagon

    • @IpSyCo
      @IpSyCo 2 роки тому +3

      Or perhaps the tech they’ve developed is being kept top secret since it is a matter of national security.

    • @Deltanorth86
      @Deltanorth86 2 роки тому +4

      @@IpSyCo it is better to send a chilling message to our adversaries with our military capabilities rather thank keeping it a secret.

    • @davidmiletic6647
      @davidmiletic6647 2 роки тому +9

      Money does not equal brains and experience.

    • @justrandomthings319
      @justrandomthings319 2 роки тому +2

      @@Deltanorth86 The tech being researched in our secret military research facilities is beyond what you can imagine.

    • @skymaster4743
      @skymaster4743 2 роки тому +7

      @@IpSyCo top secret my ass, China and Russia have the edge in intelligence through cyber intrusions.

  • @gpaje
    @gpaje 2 роки тому +66

    US has a bloated system, the fact we have the largest by far military budget yet can't compete with countries with far lower budgets means we need to get a hold of our costs and graft built into the defense industry. Throwing more money into hypersonic research is all they can do right now, but shouldn't be the case.

    • @simplyyellow6240
      @simplyyellow6240 2 роки тому +6

      I watch american documentary during 60' america has develop Hypersonic missile to defend their nuclear Sile for intercepting missile attack. But the project being scrapped because it's violated the defence deal between 2 super power. So I think USA is the first one who posses hypersonic missile

    • @matthewjudge3763
      @matthewjudge3763 2 роки тому

      It's much easier and less expensive to find solutions to sophisticated weapons systems than to be the leader in innovation. Just look up the technology race in the battle of the Atlantic, the Germans would come up with an ingenious new weapon and the British would counter it by finding the flaw in the system. It's the same with any complex weapon such as the US missile defense.

    • @NYlocked
      @NYlocked 2 роки тому +3

      Alot of the US military budget is going to veterans etc, stuff that other countries dont have so the difference is lower then what official records says.

    • @sevrent2811
      @sevrent2811 2 роки тому

      the arms service comittee needs to either go. Or politicians need to be banned from trading stocks. There's been many many cases of politicians on this committee not approving defense bills and proposals unless the bill benefits their constituents, and this leads to rising costs. These politicians literally pick who wins million/billion dollar contracts, and they get to trade stocks knowing this information before anyone else

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 2 роки тому

      China actually has a comparable military budget when adjusted by PPP and factoring in costs that it purposefully leaves out to obfuscate its real spending. Also, China/Russia are only ahead in those few categories. That’s it.

  • @samalexi2386
    @samalexi2386 2 роки тому +25

    When US does it it's all okay but when someone else does it it's very alarming 😒

    • @maximme
      @maximme 2 роки тому

      BUT as long as they are "alarmed" at others, it is okay.
      When they are alarmed at their own problems, then its bad for the rest of the world
      because they will start fixing those problems.

  • @calito44
    @calito44 2 роки тому +55

    I think the CEO of a weapons company always will say " We are behind .. THe goverment need to invest more"

    • @ericlane3256
      @ericlane3256 2 роки тому +2

      I mean, we are behind. China displayed several DF-17’s on a parade ground before we even had a working design.

    • @soysauce4223
      @soysauce4223 2 роки тому +1

      @@ericlane3256 he's not wrong. It's always been like that for decades.

    • @omnamahshivay5278
      @omnamahshivay5278 2 роки тому +2

      War and fear is the biggest business. There is money in it bro. Its a race to be rich not happy. Its a addiction

    • @jeffjohnson5053
      @jeffjohnson5053 2 роки тому

      I was living in Asia 15 years ago. The news there already reported that china built an air tunnel to test and build their hypersonic weapons. Of course, the USA did nothing. The US is always late and waits until it falls behind! 15 years ago, china has already begun building on the islands in South China seas. Of course , no one did nothing and the Evil USA liberal news refuses to report it!!

    • @ericlane3256
      @ericlane3256 2 роки тому

      @@omnamahshivay5278 You’re so clever, who would’ve thought a defense company offering a product or service would make money off it. Never heard that one before.

  • @michelangelomissoni945
    @michelangelomissoni945 2 роки тому +185

    The United States 2022 defense budget was $768 billion, $53 billion more than the President requested. The armed forces of the USA has a larger budget than the other top 10 militaries on earth combined. Not to mention that most of these other great militaries are our direct military allies. Apart from China and Russia every top military spender is our friend. When speaking about China, it is us who surround them and their precious ports with dozens of military bases (ie Japan, South Korea, Guam, Philippines, Vietnam, ect.), not the other way around. And we haven't even mentioned the trillions the Pentagon admits cannot be accounted for over the last couple of decades....
    Whats more is that USA has also been working on hypersonic technology for over 40 years, with billions invested in research at the end of the cold war. The USA is clearly way more ahead than they would like to admit, in order to maintain the tactical advantage of surprise.
    Do not listen to the beating drums of war. They will begin to bang incessantly and consistently across all media channels. They will beg you to support a vast and unsustainable standing army and convince you with paranoia and fear. So we, the citizens of the wealthiest nation of history, continue to put up with crumbling roads, corrupted healthcare and a sweeping housing crisis. America is a nation of vast resources, it can absolutely afford universal healthcare and affordable homes. It's just about how we are allocating our immense wealth. We do not need to spend billions more on contracts for weapons we created in the 80's....
    Long live the American people.

    • @npc2480
      @npc2480 2 роки тому +67

      Be careful, speaking logically and reasonably will have many here believe you are a CCP bot.

    • @jonjeskie5234
      @jonjeskie5234 2 роки тому +26

      Actually China just overtook USA as the wealthiest nation. Look it up

    • @ericsuarez834
      @ericsuarez834 2 роки тому +12

      Too much true could be considered CRT in America and get banned from history books

    • @Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry
      @Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry 2 роки тому +1

      2022-BUT WHAT ABOUT THE HYPERSONIC MISSILE GAP???!!!
      1962-BUT WHAT ABOUT THE INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE GAP???!!!
      "GAPS" have a tendency to get filled with still more tax dollars, usually when the basic research has already been bought and paid for in previous congressional appropriations. Promoting the existence of a "GAP" helps to further pad corporate profits, and executive salaries and bonuses. Congressional leaders, whose districts/states invariably are home to industries standing to gain from programme contracts, also gain from the votes that result from whatever jobs are created.

    • @lembafranck3490
      @lembafranck3490 2 роки тому +4

      @@jonjeskie5234 IT S JUST NOT TRUE SO KEEP DREAMING

  • @osvaldoarias1121
    @osvaldoarias1121 2 роки тому +2

    The US is too busy trying to figure out who belongs in whose bathroom

  • @luis566lc
    @luis566lc 2 роки тому +13

    The US is so behind on hypersonic tech it’s scary I’m sure we will catch up just sucks to see the US Last in place in terms of tech /: I wonder how much USA could accomplish if it focused on improving tech for defense an offense to keep Americans safe instead of social media or the meta verse

    • @user-xu5ru1yx9h
      @user-xu5ru1yx9h 2 роки тому +1

      美国最危险,已经入侵了这个地球上十几个国家,美国危害全世界民众。

    • @MrMangoman48
      @MrMangoman48 2 роки тому

      Beautiful I hope they finish

  • @ChiefOfProtocol_ZW
    @ChiefOfProtocol_ZW 2 роки тому +114

    We can develop hypersonic weapons but not pass an audit at the DoD and still get more funding.

    • @chinesesparrows
      @chinesesparrows 2 роки тому +8

      We can elect a president who claims hes still in audit over 5 years while misusing charity money as a slush fund

    • @luckycharm8888
      @luckycharm8888 2 роки тому +1

      DoD on audit???? Duh!🤣😂🤣

    • @princetandukar9290
      @princetandukar9290 2 роки тому +4

      This fact does more damage than any Chinese 'hyperphony missle'

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 роки тому

      @@princetandukar9290 what damage does it do?

    • @zombiestory6353
      @zombiestory6353 2 роки тому

      If a corporation sell than audit no one would invest in it no bank would give it credit no one would have anything to do with it but since it's the Pentagon somehow it's okay

  • @bigmuchknow342
    @bigmuchknow342 2 роки тому +68

    Hey at least the US is ahead on the videos about it. I approve this video.

    • @seimela
      @seimela 2 роки тому +13

      China 🇨🇳 is not busy make video, they practically have it

    • @dulmaka9448
      @dulmaka9448 2 роки тому

      😂😂😂😂

    • @phansclan5785
      @phansclan5785 2 роки тому +3

      By making videos like this. The US military gonna get a huge FUNDS to upgrade lol

    • @leezhieng
      @leezhieng 2 роки тому +6

      @@phansclan5785 Most of the money will go into CEO and board of directors' account anyway. The money will end up buying super yachts instead.

    • @phansclan5785
      @phansclan5785 2 роки тому +1

      @@leezhieng oh when it comes to military budget and defense systems/ arms race. They made videos like this showing other countries had advantages just to tell the Congress and Supreme Court that give more money.

  • @bspi624
    @bspi624 2 роки тому +4

    This is disgusting when considering how much money we spend on defense.

    • @ovtrice84
      @ovtrice84 2 роки тому

      Thats because some of that money goes to defend other countries and the politicians dont care much about protecting home

  • @brennencox516
    @brennencox516 2 роки тому +16

    9:50 There should be plenty of data available to engineers and developers from the X-15 and SR-71 programs. As well as the space shuttle program.
    Plenty of things have gone very fast in our atmosphere and survived.

    • @TinRapper
      @TinRapper 2 роки тому +1

      You know they're bullshiting about being "behind"

    • @lukemurray4950
      @lukemurray4950 2 роки тому +1

      @@TinRapper no they really are not lol

    • @lukemurray4950
      @lukemurray4950 2 роки тому

      You must of missed it, the technology is completely different. Dealing with much higher heats and for longer periods of time.

    • @brennencox516
      @brennencox516 2 роки тому

      @@lukemurray4950 After I posted that I thought of this. Even if the SR-71 went mach 4, the increased stress of going 5 or 6 would be important.

    • @lukemurray4950
      @lukemurray4950 2 роки тому

      @@brennencox516 I'm not gonna act like I understand the science but the air is under so much friction it ignites the air. It's basically like when the space shuttle is re-entering and it uses its heat shield to survive the head caused by the friction except a hypersonic missile would have to put up with higher temperatures for longer periods of time and across the whole missile. Far from easy to figure out.
      A little nerdy but this is similar to the issue of possibly traveling at the speed of light. Even if we could get to the speed the problems we would face would be a bigger challenge than getting up to that speed. For example a grain of space dust hits it and it will explore the whole craft simply because the amount of energy that is being created. I find this stuff super interesting.

  • @JRPGGUY
    @JRPGGUY 2 роки тому +103

    Gotta wonder what that nearly trillion dollars spent a year goes to when smaller militarizes are producing deadlier weapons

    • @goofguy316
      @goofguy316 2 роки тому +43

      When you have hundreds of foreign bases and a bloated administrative base, that costs hundreds of billions of dollars, it’s no surprise.

    • @chinesesparrows
      @chinesesparrows 2 роки тому +14

      No one has the global reach with the options the US military has from surveillance to targeted disabling of equipment/facility to complete mass annihilation. These missiles are only one of the menu of options.

    • @justrandomthings319
      @justrandomthings319 2 роки тому +8

      If you really think the US is behind then you're stupid. You really think the works of the secret military research facilities would be announced here.

    • @wamnicho
      @wamnicho 2 роки тому +20

      @@justrandomthings319 what secret military tech are you talking about, the US has no alien tech they're working on, it's more focused on having their infantry start wearing highheels in combat

    • @justrandomthings319
      @justrandomthings319 2 роки тому +3

      @@wamnicho Funny but no. Research is well ahead of operations.

  • @parrotbrand2782
    @parrotbrand2782 2 роки тому +64

    Aircraft carriers ended the era of battleships. Hypersonic weapons will end the era of aircraft carriers.

    • @tommydavis5556
      @tommydavis5556 2 роки тому +6

      Not necessarily you can still knock out hypersonic missiles out of the sky

    • @TrugginsOFFICIAL
      @TrugginsOFFICIAL 2 роки тому +12

      @@tommydavis5556 he doesn’t know what he’s talking about lol

    • @picasoj5944
      @picasoj5944 2 роки тому +17

      @@tommydavis5556 you cant

    • @sunnydaysddt2068
      @sunnydaysddt2068 2 роки тому +14

      @@tommydavis5556 you can't.

    • @randomassname445
      @randomassname445 2 роки тому +7

      @@TrugginsOFFICIAL You cant.

  • @MisteriosGloriosos922
    @MisteriosGloriosos922 2 роки тому

    *Amazing!!!. Liked & Subcribed!!!*

  • @murc111
    @murc111 2 роки тому +22

    Hypersonic airliners would be great. But seriously, the focus should be on 2 things. quicker boarding process, and supersonic jets. a mach 2 airliner is far easier to build, then a mach 5+. You would cut the flight time in half, and the boarding process should be, if I have a 2pm flight departure, I arrive 15-20 minutes early, check in bag, walk through a super quick scanner, and I'm on the plane.

    • @753238
      @753238 2 роки тому +2

      We can only achieve that with CIA knowing everything about us and coordinate with TSA. We need AI systems to hunt the terrorist for us just like China.

  • @DanBurgaud
    @DanBurgaud 2 роки тому +83

    Sadly, all those Nazi rocket scientists from WW2 are all dead, the poached Soviet rocket scientists from the cold war era are all retired, and USA could not poach Russian nor Chinese rocket scientists...

    • @enthused7591
      @enthused7591 2 роки тому +8

      Yet the free market in the US has more advanced rockets than China and Russia combined. What do you think the US has in it's arsenal after spending $1 Trillion per year for the last 20 years on military technology and national defense? The US was splitting uranium atoms to vaporize entire cities in the 1940s when people were debating whether to convert from riding a horse to buying a Ford Model T. I promise, they have things you can't even imagine. Hypersonic missiles are almost definitely obsolete to the US government.

    • @danieldewilson
      @danieldewilson 2 роки тому

      @@enthused7591 thank you. Part of me thinks that this public talk on the lack of this technology is just another layer to our cloak and dagger secrecy. Hell, magnetically accelerated cannons release rounds going hypersonic and then there is also our laser tech.

    • @TenOrbital
      @TenOrbital 2 роки тому +4

      US does not need other scientists. It drove the USSR into the ground with better tech, the CCP is another USSR. A colossus with feet of clay.

    • @thetreekeeper143
      @thetreekeeper143 2 роки тому +21

      It's because the CIA and FBI agents racistly targeted and harassed top Chinese/American scientists acusing them of spying charges. It was obviously a typical racist thing to do. They all went back to China instead. One top Chinese American scientist from NASA was so peed off by his harassment that he went to China and became the lead scientist for the hypersonics program in China.

    • @TenOrbital
      @TenOrbital 2 роки тому +10

      @@thetreekeeper143 - Oh, yeah, despite mountains of evidence of the CCP stealing IP everywhere, it's because someone was mean to some scientist.

  • @lameiraangelo
    @lameiraangelo 2 роки тому +14

    4:40 Translation: "He wants more money".

  • @salmanali-fp6qr
    @salmanali-fp6qr 2 роки тому

    Great & Best of Luck Bro ❤️👍

  • @frankrosenbloom
    @frankrosenbloom 2 роки тому +11

    The Lockheed F-117 flew secretly for 7 years before being revealed to the public. In fact, it was revealed only after it was used in combat in the invasion of Panama. The US likely has some surprises up their sleeve. The revealing of hypersonics by Russia served a political purpose, and the US has no similar need for publicity. The X-15 was a piloted hypersonic plane the US flew in the 1960's. We also have a hypersonic glide vehicle. It's called the space shuttle and it glided, with people aboard, at 17,000 miles per hour. We will, I am sure, be able to produce hypersonic missiles. However, it is more important to produce hypersonic missile defenses. we have no proof of the accuracy of Russian or Chinese hypersonic missiles. In addition, hypersonic or not, they have to be able to find and target our ships. In this regard, we do not know they are capable of hitting moving vessels traveling in thousands or tens of thousands of square miles of open ocean. The Russians have had supersonic missiles for years, faster than ours, but we were not worried then. Additionally, we have many thousands more long range non-nuclear missiles than Russia or China. Maybe our military knows things they are not telling us? Also, look at the actual military incompetence of the Russians in their invasion of Ukraine. They will unfortunately likely succeed eventually by killing untold number of civilians. Contrast that to the swift action against Iraq in the first and second Gulf wars. Also the rapid removal of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Yes, I know, we ran away, but the precision and effectiveness of the US military all those years ago was better than the Russians today. Could it be that they are simply not as good?

  • @noverdinho
    @noverdinho 2 роки тому +83

    Now you feel what Russia felt back in 1990s - mid2000s 😂

    • @what5719
      @what5719 2 роки тому +2

      @roger bachus wdym by that ?🤨

    • @--Skip--
      @--Skip-- 2 роки тому +2

      @@what5719 You username answers your question...like a double negative.

    • @what5719
      @what5719 2 роки тому +1

      @@--Skip--
      I don't even know how can you think your username

  • @max21c
    @max21c 2 роки тому +17

    UA-cam has deleted previous comments about US military corruption and Washingtonian corruption that has had a negative effect on progress in science, technology, engineering and is a major contributing factor to the USA falling behind. Banana Republics do suffer from the effects of corruption. The USA is no different than any other banana republic.

  • @thatguy1389
    @thatguy1389 2 роки тому +1

    Did the guy being interviewed totally fart on camera at 8:27??? 😂😂😂

  • @claytonphillips2930
    @claytonphillips2930 2 роки тому +2

    Don’t believe for a second that we aren’t the ones out there flying those UAPs 😂😂

  • @TaskSwitcherify
    @TaskSwitcherify 2 роки тому +10

    So even less money for our education, infrastructure, and healthcare... But more money for faster missiles. I don't like where this is going.

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 2 роки тому

      of course, cause to get new tech you pay rich people, you don't invest in education. When has education brought new technology?! I'M GD IRONMAN!

    • @ericlane3256
      @ericlane3256 2 роки тому +2

      There isn’t less money going into education, infrastructure, healthcare. Education is one of the most government subsidized sectors in our economy, yet the grades don’t get better? There’s plenty of money in our education system, it’s Bad teachers not getting fired and there’s no incentive to change that. We still outspend 80% of the world on healthcare through public and private efforts.

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 2 роки тому

      @@ericlane3256 it's bad management not teachers. Our history books and science books teach 1980's understanding of science and probably some of the most revisionist history in the western world.

  • @piotrd.4850
    @piotrd.4850 2 роки тому +27

    Uhm. "Air molecules are not being ripped appart" - simply they can't move away fast enough before pressure compresses them enough to heat themselves and pressing body. As for hypersonic - every spacecraft and ICBM and MIRV is hypersonic.

    • @alfarabibraza1236
      @alfarabibraza1236 2 роки тому +1

      the difference is, flying hypersonic in low altitude is much more difficult for radar to detect, and more difficult to intercept

    • @imperiumgrim4717
      @imperiumgrim4717 2 роки тому +1

      Hyper sonic missiles doesn't pass the ozone layer (troposphere) it reaches "closely" enough to the tip then Launch its secondary missiles remotely to its target. Quickly "enough" then a nuclear missiles because when a nuclear missiles passes the ozone layers making a big U-turn the satellite will/"if" detect it earlier.

    • @imperiumgrim4717
      @imperiumgrim4717 2 роки тому +1

      @@alfarabibraza1236 yes

    • @myopicthunder
      @myopicthunder 2 роки тому

      people don't know the difference between ICBMs MIRVs and cruise missiles.

  • @mittao86
    @mittao86 2 роки тому +7

    Soon U.S will fall behind in everything and not just hypersonic missile.

  • @chasthanhburns123
    @chasthanhburns123 2 роки тому +1

    If our military does not have Hypersonic weapons the public should never pay a penny more in taxes.

  • @AbhaySingh-os7zp
    @AbhaySingh-os7zp 2 роки тому +111

    See thats the point, unlike the post ww2 era, this time everyone has the resources, brilliance, ability and time to leap frog as well. US only succeeded when the rest of the world was distracted or had bigger issues. Now, its not the same.

    • @luisgutierrez8047
      @luisgutierrez8047 2 роки тому +13

      Russia budget is a PITTANCE compared to US.
      China has A LOT going on at home. Like...their budget for "social stability" is higher than their military one. And overall smaller than the US. Their only advantage is that they steal tech secrets from companies for their use

    • @pjay123
      @pjay123 2 роки тому +25

      @@luisgutierrez8047 as if the USA didn’t steal anything ie Russian helicopter,planes spies on Russian subs,as if they can afford all this money they borrow never to pay it back.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 роки тому +2

      @@pjay123 the money is borrowed from the US itself, the rest of the world couldn't afford it.

    • @pjay123
      @pjay123 2 роки тому +13

      @@seanthe100 America sells bonds to investors and did hold US dept which they have sold most of as us will steal money owed to other countries like stealing Syrian oil and hijack Iran’s oil tankers and sell the oil.china,jApan and Middle Eastern countries hold USAdept which America can’t pay back so if everyone ask for the money America will be a 3rd world country like al those people living in tents like at skidrow and plenty of other place in the USA. How much has the pentagon lost trillions.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 2 роки тому +6

      @@pjay123 do you seriously think third world countries have any money of any significants to the US. For reference the US is the largest producer of oil on the planet yet that oil makes up less than 5% of the US economy. There's nothing any other country has that really makes any significance to the massive $23 trillion economy. For the US the real wealth is inside the US there's not much outside.

  • @sadmancho
    @sadmancho 2 роки тому +39

    The country who has the largest military budget is falling behind smh.

  • @eddiedoran7427
    @eddiedoran7427 Рік тому +1

    Thank you!

  • @aleksandarmijatovic7805
    @aleksandarmijatovic7805 2 роки тому +13

    Didn't russia already made 2 hypersonic rockets, with both being operational and are entering service in next year?

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 2 роки тому +4

      they ARE operational and in service since the end of 2021... now they just put more in use, in all platforms: air, subs, navy, land.

    • @davidfortier6976
      @davidfortier6976 2 роки тому

      So they say. And you know, the Russian government is famously honest.

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 2 роки тому +9

      @@davidfortier6976 - that is rich, coming from a guy whose country lied the whole world with Iraq WMDs ! lol !

    • @aleksandarmijatovic7805
      @aleksandarmijatovic7805 2 роки тому +1

      @@davidfortier6976 yes but, they had live tests of the hypersonic rockets, also pentagon had officially commented about there tests and how they influence american foreign policy.

    • @EGvids1
      @EGvids1 2 роки тому

      Yes the Avangard

  • @direction09
    @direction09 2 роки тому +14

    "Traveling above Mach Five literally causes air molecules to burst open, heating the flying object by the 1000s." 3:10. Huh? Who writes like this and how did that make the cut?

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 2 роки тому +6

      Same people who say that "Elon Musk is building tunnels using rocket technology" xD

    • @maxg2371
      @maxg2371 2 роки тому

      A Russian here. 'Air molecules' is wonderful!

    • @my3bikaht88
      @my3bikaht88 2 роки тому +1

      The chief characteristic of hypersonic aerodynamics is that the temperature of the flow is so great that the chemistry of the diatomic molecules of the air must be considered. At low hypersonic speeds, the molecular bonds vibrate, which changes the magnitude of the forces generated by the air on the aircraft. At high hypersonic speeds, the molecules break apart producing an electrically charged plasma around the aircraft.

    • @my3bikaht88
      @my3bikaht88 2 роки тому

      This is probably the source for the text, by NASA

    • @maxg2371
      @maxg2371 2 роки тому

      @@my3bikaht88 'Diatomic molecules of the air' is very different from 'the air molecules'.

  • @herohero-fw1vc
    @herohero-fw1vc 2 роки тому +48

    The US fell behind in RDE technology too. It's the next generation of rocket technology. Japan tested the Radial Detonation Engine recently in space.

    • @ivantimofeev2233
      @ivantimofeev2233 2 роки тому +6

      and there is spacex, fukin landing rockets and re flying for 10 times a booster.... really behind u kno

    • @Genzphilosopher
      @Genzphilosopher 2 роки тому +11

      If we didn't have space X. U.S. would be so far behind on rocket technology. But now its looking like we're ahead of everyone else.

    • @diocre7446
      @diocre7446 2 роки тому +5

      @@ivantimofeev2233 nasa is still using russian made engine. Even Elon Musk said that Russian engine are superior or best than spacex engine. And Russia also now have the spacex version like engine you are proud of. Still behind I guess. And China is now building their own space station. If that is not being behind I don't know what that is then.

    • @prabhatsingh5234
      @prabhatsingh5234 2 роки тому +3

      @@diocre7446 if youbare foklowing tgen you are behind do new things

    • @brandonm7867
      @brandonm7867 2 роки тому +1

      @@diocre7446 nobody has a full flow staged combustion engine in service except for spacex and for comparison there starship/superheavy system stands alone in its own class not even NASA's sls comes close, however I would like to see a country try to reach spacex's level but many space agency's like roscosmos'isro and ariane space believe it's impossible to do so without government funding.

  • @gomezbollina1004
    @gomezbollina1004 Рік тому +37

    *Great video. We all strive towards financial stability and a better life. It is easy to achieve this through the right investment, by living frugally and budgeting. I’m glad I learnt early in life to work hard for financial freedom*

    • @gomezbollina1004
      @gomezbollina1004 Рік тому

      In my opinion, venturing into a good investment, is not just a strategy for generating passive income but a profitable saving method for future expenses. Those who fail to make the right decisions early in life end up regretting. Nevertheless, investing can be difficult and risky doing it solely. For this reason , I advise on seeking help from professionals(financial advisor). It’s not just watching videos and reading investment book but the challenge is using it well.

    • @sonlee8066
      @sonlee8066 Рік тому

      @@gomezbollina1004 I’m truly inspired by your words. I’m very interested in investing and I’ve a good sum of money which I’m ready put in with the right information. My fear is losing my money in a wrong investment. For this reason, I’m willing to listen to your suggestions and ideas on how to invest wisely.

    • @gomezbollina1004
      @gomezbollina1004 Рік тому

      @@sonlee8066 I firmly believe that the success of any investment depends on having the right information, regardless of what others say, do whatever you set your mind to. Warren Buffer always says "be greedy when others are fearful and be fearful when others are greedy". This is certainly the trick to succeeding even when others fail. I made *$200,000* working with *Donald Nathan Scott* a licensed *financial adviser* . It’s been a promising experience so far with him.

    • @nathaliamaurice5626
      @nathaliamaurice5626 Рік тому

      @@gomezbollina1004 Please , how do I connect with your financial planner( Donald Nathan Scott) ?

    • @faithrussel9384
      @faithrussel9384 Рік тому

      Everyone should know that operating a business will pay off under certain conditions and that a job requires certain requirements to earn more than others. But with the right investment information, you can build, inherit, and store money for future spending. I always tell anyone who wants to listen to me that looking for investment ideas and having friends who help you spend less and build your finances are essential for a financially independent and healthy life.

  • @poncedeoly469
    @poncedeoly469 2 роки тому +2

    imagine where humans would be without war

  • @alancode3570
    @alancode3570 2 роки тому +7

    Video brought to you by Ratheon.

  • @stevemrayz357
    @stevemrayz357 2 роки тому +22

    "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones". Einstein

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 2 роки тому

      doubt it

    • @stevemrayz357
      @stevemrayz357 2 роки тому

      @@carlosandleon ok i guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @ameharu2522
      @ameharu2522 2 роки тому +1

      Well it might be true since Ww3 will destroy everything and the world will get destroyed by a nuclear winter since there will be a Ww3 and ya it will destroy everything and when another world war erupt it will be fought will stick and stones cuz they have run out of resources:)

    • @ameharu2522
      @ameharu2522 2 роки тому +1

      Don't take it seriously tho

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 2 роки тому

      @@ameharu2522 You don't know that.

  • @PETE4955
    @PETE4955 Рік тому +1

    Hypsonics will not win wars. Motivation does.

  • @danielchoi2345
    @danielchoi2345 2 роки тому

    Omg that was my airbreathing propulsion class professor!

  • @FloofyMinari
    @FloofyMinari 2 роки тому +99

    The answer is because it wasn't a priority. We've had the capabilities for decades, but there was no need for them. The U.S Military has been developing Hypersonic missiles for a few years now.

    • @MotorCityPhoenix313
      @MotorCityPhoenix313 2 роки тому +22

      How have we had the capabilities? We only just got a successful hypersonic booster motor test in October.

    • @FloofyMinari
      @FloofyMinari 2 роки тому +7

      @@MotorCityPhoenix313 The Fundamentals are there. You only have to look at the X-15 1960s and even some traces from the X-8 rocket from the late 40s. The US also tested hypersonic missile in 2010.
      Again, it all hinges on what is need by the Military and Hypersonic missiles were not needed especially when facing lesser foes like in Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan.

    • @einfachnurleo7099
      @einfachnurleo7099 2 роки тому +1

      It is kinda nuts when you think about it. Concord's first commercial flight was in January 1976. That was 45 years ago. Of course we did make progress from back then but compared to the kind of technology they used to have and the computers we have now shouldn't we be way way ahead? I mean they only had computers with the strength of basic calculators to put a man on the moon!

    • @jimmybuntaran235
      @jimmybuntaran235 2 роки тому +3

      @@FloofyMinari those lesser foes make your soldiers runaway with tail on their leg

    • @jaymanalo7256
      @jaymanalo7256 2 роки тому +17

      @@BrotherMan321 THE USA IS IN DENIAL JUST LIKE THEIR GENDERS LMAO

  • @litzbluejay3152
    @litzbluejay3152 2 роки тому +8

    This is why Russia was way ahead since Sputnik 1

  • @mariano7699
    @mariano7699 2 роки тому +1

    Deathly that end.
    F16 pilot R.I.P.

  • @PotofGlue
    @PotofGlue 2 роки тому

    Fascinating, I’d love to learn more! I’m going to look up hyper sonic
    I have now lost all faith in humanity

  • @winstonalf
    @winstonalf 2 роки тому +43

    US fell behind in AI, Supercomputing and Quantum Computing too.

    • @f9658
      @f9658 2 роки тому +2

      I heard China has the edge over America in that field. But idk

    • @parrotbrand2782
      @parrotbrand2782 2 роки тому +15

      Quantum computing, China is definitely ahead.

    • @MixMeAdrink
      @MixMeAdrink 2 роки тому +3

      @@parrotbrand2782 using Intel chips lol

    • @MixMeAdrink
      @MixMeAdrink 2 роки тому +2

      @@inigodeloyola5842 on US designs

    • @Deadassbruhfrfr
      @Deadassbruhfrfr 2 роки тому +5

      I doubt it. Nobody would actually know how far China and the US are because for both it would be a secret. So saying one is far behind the other has very little weight behind it.

  • @danh6320
    @danh6320 2 роки тому +37

    When they study science, technology, engineering, mathematics and we study liberal arts and gender politics

    • @krnpowr
      @krnpowr 2 роки тому

      Kids here barely study compared to kids in competing countries. They're busy with their social lives, partying, dealing with dysfunctional families, being shot, and who they're going to go to the dance with.

  • @Chironex_Fleckeri
    @Chironex_Fleckeri 2 роки тому +1

    We've had hypersonic missiles since the 1960s. Next.

  • @danielma179
    @danielma179 2 роки тому +1

    7:14 i love these videos

  • @donarrivas1675
    @donarrivas1675 2 роки тому +62

    Not only behind in hypersonic but also behind the laser technology. Laser is known to blind the pilots and disrupts others.

    • @MemesOfProduction69
      @MemesOfProduction69 2 роки тому +2

      Lmaoooo no we aren't.

    • @Seastallion
      @Seastallion 2 роки тому +3

      Weaponized lasers are already being developed as pods to attache to fighters capable of taking out missiles in the US.

    • @MemesOfProduction69
      @MemesOfProduction69 2 роки тому +3

      @@Seastallion not to mention the ship board laser defense systems that continue to become more and more powerful, which we've used for almost a decade now. If people keep listening to cable news they will always stay massively uninformed.

    • @rui9590
      @rui9590 2 роки тому +1

      Bruh are you serious haha 🤣

    • @jc.1191
      @jc.1191 2 роки тому

      The blind the pilots laser is the same my cat chases. It's literally a toy here.

  • @8600GTX
    @8600GTX 2 роки тому +14

    No matter how fast plane can go, the airport always slow people down( travel to the airport and TSA )

    • @wizzotizzo
      @wizzotizzo 2 роки тому

      It was made that way for a reason.

  • @prestonhanson501
    @prestonhanson501 2 роки тому +1

    Can't have 2 wars going on and still afford advancements

  • @peteruk8925
    @peteruk8925 2 роки тому +56

    I believe that the fastest plane ever was the X-15 reaching 4520 mph ,approximately 5.59 mach, so much faster than the SR71.

    • @MFPRego
      @MFPRego 2 роки тому +28

      Thing is, the X15 was not a plane, it was a manned rocket

    • @Eureka092
      @Eureka092 2 роки тому +3

      @@MFPRego if an unpowered glider could be considered a plane, i think a rocket powered aircraft could be count as a plane too

    • @MFPRego
      @MFPRego 2 роки тому +13

      @@Eureka092 it could, but it isnt. Dont blame me, blame the people who categorize this stuff ;)

    • @Eureka092
      @Eureka092 2 роки тому +5

      @@MFPRego well the definition of an airplane is "a powered flying vehicle with fixed wings and a weight greater than that of the air it displaces.". Which means that the X-15 is by definition, a plane.

    • @francescoboselli6033
      @francescoboselli6033 2 роки тому +9

      In fact of we want to be precise, the SR71 is the fastest JET plane

  • @aaron46781
    @aaron46781 2 роки тому +21

    But it's ok we're leading the world in Trans Generals.

    • @consumer338
      @consumer338 2 роки тому +8

      And school shootings 🤡

    • @johnnykage8973
      @johnnykage8973 2 роки тому +1

      #1 in ignorant fascists

    • @jesusdachrist9192
      @jesusdachrist9192 2 роки тому +2

      Complaining about trans generals when we don't have an affordable healthcare system, LOL

  • @peterroberts2952
    @peterroberts2952 2 роки тому +19

    The US fell behind in all ways to really benefit citizens.

  • @robertheizmann7249
    @robertheizmann7249 2 роки тому +1

    We need to get moving on this technology.

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 2 роки тому +1

    Nice video.

  • @miraphycs7377
    @miraphycs7377 2 роки тому +17

    "Russian patent number *****09 relates to the field of rocket technology, and more specifically to hypersonic cruise missiles equipped with a hypersonic ramjet engine. The invention describes a method of application and device hypersonic cruise missile (CRPD), allowing to solve the problem of performing a combat mission to destroy ground and surface targets of such a missile. The described invention is designed to maximize the combat potential of the CMP with the scramjet. The design mode for the scramjet are high-altitude cruise conditions while maintaining the estimated cruise speed, and the need to reduce the altitude and flight speed creates difficult technical problems due to the fact that: an engine designed to perform a hypersonic mid-flight at high altitude is not able to continue to work at low-altitude trajectory sections associated with a decrease in the flight number M, hence, the rocket must approach the ground or surface target with an inactive engine; characteristics of sustainability and controllability of CRPD with inactive scramjet significantly deteriorate, loss of stability becomes possible; there is also a danger of destruction of the scramjet design due to the increase in pressure in the flow part of the engine while reducing the CMP from the march height before hitting the target."

    • @Maddog29
      @Maddog29 2 роки тому +2

      Thank you for the info on this.

    • @ppen8359
      @ppen8359 2 роки тому +1

      Even if Russian hypersonics is perfect, Russia needs to find a US aircraft carrier first. It is not easy with satellites because it will take 20 minutes to direct a satellite to a location and it can only see that location for 10 minutes because the satellite is not geostationary. Russia needs thousands of drones like predators or Global Hawk to find US aircraft carriers because only drones have loiter time to maintain constant track.

    • @r3dpowel796
      @r3dpowel796 2 роки тому

      Russia is behind China. in terms of Hypersonic weapons.

  • @CompositesNG
    @CompositesNG 2 роки тому +17

    We’re behind because we don’t emphasize these subjects enough in middle and high school.

    • @doogleticker5183
      @doogleticker5183 2 роки тому +2

      CRT is more important!! lol

    • @f9658
      @f9658 2 роки тому +8

      Well, in America the youth has to worry more about money than education.

    • @CompositesNG
      @CompositesNG 2 роки тому +3

      It’s the entire culture sadly.

    • @samsilvadda7288
      @samsilvadda7288 2 роки тому +2

      @@f9658 and school shooting

    • @chandelier6811
      @chandelier6811 2 роки тому

      @@doogleticker5183 You don’t even know what that is.

  • @intubungamer6173
    @intubungamer6173 2 роки тому +3

    I just would like to correct you @CNBC the X-43A currently holds the record of Mach 9.6... Thats defenetly more than the Blackbird... The Blackbird is only the fastest combat ready plane...

  • @tashahoekstra8613
    @tashahoekstra8613 2 роки тому

    It's cool and rocket science has advanced quite a lot since the last century.

  • @bekicot88
    @bekicot88 2 роки тому +7

    The right question is "HOW THE US FELL BEHIND IN INFRASTRUCTURE FROM EUROPE AND CHINA?"

    • @HOTPLATEGAMING
      @HOTPLATEGAMING 2 роки тому +2

      China? 😂😂😂

    • @mikicerise6250
      @mikicerise6250 2 роки тому

      i dont buhleeve in yurp and chyna its all lies da eleets says to try and control us to take away are guns.

  • @sharjinalaviantik9688
    @sharjinalaviantik9688 2 роки тому +7

    usa has double or triple budget on hypersonic missile research than russia or china. usa has conducted 3 hypersonic missile testing this year, all failed. makes you wonder whre all that money goes!
    on the other hand, russian zircon hypersonic missile is pretty much untouchable right now

  • @MinorityMans
    @MinorityMans 2 роки тому

    Funny that this is way better than CNBC's business documentaries.

  • @jackparker8686
    @jackparker8686 2 роки тому

    Interesting points that we cannot dare look away from.. and that's now.

  • @johncarpenter4083
    @johncarpenter4083 2 роки тому +17

    If U.S. wasn't such a major threat to any developing nation, would any developing nation NEED THE CAPABILITY OF DEFENDING ITSELF?

    • @Mrbfgray
      @Mrbfgray 2 роки тому +2

      Yes they would. The US is not the biggest threat to most nations today.

    • @CitsVariants
      @CitsVariants 2 роки тому

      Who is defending lol

    • @prophetforprofit1431
      @prophetforprofit1431 2 роки тому +4

      Even Russia hates terrorists and America has helped them with problems

    • @prophetforprofit1431
      @prophetforprofit1431 2 роки тому +2

      As well as them helping us with terrorists

    • @001mhu
      @001mhu 2 роки тому +5

      @@Mrbfgray because it's already brought most nations to their knees. fact is MOST countries simply dont have the human potential to ever compete with the united states - let alone surpassing it. that's why they are content to live under the global world order that the u.s. sets up, as long as the u.s. toss them a few bones here and there in exchange for their allegiance. that's simply how the world works. in the 80s when japan's industries start to surpass the u.s., look what the u.s. did? basically what they're doing to china now. in the end they forced japan to sign the plaza accord agreement. not a threat? i mean the u.s. and allies destroyed Libya when they wanted to get away from the u.s. dollar, is currently doing a regime change in Ethiopia (failing though) and trying to install the previously TPLF regime back into power by removing the democratically elected current leader (with overwhelming 90% support from its people) why? to turn the region from being friendly with china (and Ethiopia isn't the only one the u.s. attempted this year.... civil unrest in myanmar, thailand, malaysia, solomon island, assassination of haiti's president, guinea's regime change, etc. all happened this year...... right, u.s. is not a threat if you know your place and don't ever threaten its economic hegemony.

  • @dominiclallande
    @dominiclallande 2 роки тому +8

    Okay, but how did the US fall behind in hypersonics technology?

    • @FrAnC3sCoN123
      @FrAnC3sCoN123 2 роки тому +3

      wasted 20 years in 2 useless wars

    • @jamesschultz30
      @jamesschultz30 2 роки тому

      No reason it should of happened, if if actually did. We were looking at this tech in the '70's. But then it was killed or hiden.

    • @mikicerise6250
      @mikicerise6250 2 роки тому

      They spent the last 30 years going, "duuuuuuuuurrrrrr. jaybus gun be mad." "no, mama naycha gun be mad." "no jaybus!"

  • @user-fx2oo3bi9c
    @user-fx2oo3bi9c 2 роки тому +1

    700 billion dollars defence budget not enough for American scientists R&D .
    This money is enough for building homes and food to eat for rest of world .

  • @deepakdhillon9424
    @deepakdhillon9424 2 роки тому +3

    Even india is ahead of usa in hypersonic technology .usa hegemony is decreasing as we know future is of asia

  • @jimmymcdonald1638
    @jimmymcdonald1638 2 роки тому +6

    The weight of an overreaching over regulating government kills innovation

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 2 роки тому +2

      Didn't seem that way in China or Russia....

    • @Ry_TSG
      @Ry_TSG 2 роки тому

      I think you mean rampant corruption and a hideously greedy MIC

  • @satmohabir7175
    @satmohabir7175 2 роки тому +16

    India tested the scramjet in their recent hypersonic demonstrator. The vehicle is first brought to speeds that will sustain the scramjet operation.

    • @dragonjpt1195
      @dragonjpt1195 2 роки тому +1

      India has very long long way to go.. It did what major nations did a decade back

    • @vivekanandan5093
      @vivekanandan5093 2 роки тому +5

      @@dragonjpt1195 still better. We spend very limited on such things but still succeed at the end of the day. 😀

    • @satmohabir7175
      @satmohabir7175 2 роки тому +1

      @@dragonjpt1195 Major nations like Pakistan, yes.

    • @satmohabir7175
      @satmohabir7175 2 роки тому +6

      @@dragonjpt1195 Nobody has done what India's intention is wrt to hypersonics. It will be ready in 2 or 3 years because the demonstrator has validated the tech that India will use.

    • @Rippinkitten18
      @Rippinkitten18 2 роки тому +1

      Didn’t it take India 20 years to build a carrier ?

  • @mikicerise6250
    @mikicerise6250 2 роки тому

    Well, at least now you know who those "UFOs" teasing you off the Atlantic coast were. 🤣

  • @arturoeugster7228
    @arturoeugster7228 2 роки тому

    There is a huge difference in operating a civilian aircraft at hypersonic speeds economically and applying hypersonic vehicles for military purposes.
    50 years ago when the travel at supersonic speeds was developed to match the Anglo French airliner in response to President Kennedy's initiative, it was determined that economical travel was best near Mach 2.7, at altitudes around 80000 feet. But, and there is always a significant not apparent consideration that must be observed, traveling at those altitudes increases the radiation exposure to the passengers, requiring shielding.
    As far as aero thermodynamic solutions are concerned, significant progress has been made, leaders are former Rolls Royce people, with new approaches being investigated in propulsion technology using hydrogen as fuel.
    The approach differs from the commonly so called supersonic external combustion process discussed in the video.
    The company is called Reaction Engines, The hypersonic transport: Skylon

  • @whatever_12
    @whatever_12 2 роки тому +10

    4:45 "Building on our work" eh no dude they got skillful scientists too, It ain't like US was giving out schematic to them.. Give credit where credit is due

  • @skipper09pepper
    @skipper09pepper 2 роки тому +13

    They seem confused b/w hypersonic cruise missiles and hypersonic air travel. Two very different things.

    • @myopicthunder
      @myopicthunder 2 роки тому +1

      yep and people don't know the difference between traditional ICBMs many of which can travel at hypersonic speeds in final stages and a cruise missile that can change course.

  • @habibi750
    @habibi750 Рік тому +1

    The aliens have already figured it out

  • @user-tr8uu8yn7s
    @user-tr8uu8yn7s 2 роки тому +1

    In other word : We need more money to counter this new threat, 50 trillion sounds just about right

  • @LegendNinja41
    @LegendNinja41 2 роки тому +12

    The Intro is a perfect example of Framing, i have to say. It's literally 10/10 Framing.
    ''.. that's important for military applications, it could have commercial applications. it could also open up new ways of reaching space'' proceeds to show an American NASA Space Shuttle launching. So a Fair or even Favorable depiction of US Government interests in this technology.
    Shows video of an Russian flag with an Explosion behind it, narrator:''but it also shed light on it's destructive potential''
    By that part the Viewer is made felt that Destruction and War is the objective to why Russia is interested, while showing the American NASA Shuttle previously and being uncritical on the Usa.
    ''China or Russia possibly experimenting with Hypersonic technology'' So..? The Usa not? or are the Usa the only one allowed?
    The Viewer by that line gets suggested that China, Russia are doing something sneaky and wrong.
    ''And we know China isn't building these capabilities purely for defense'' Oh right, but the Usa does, amirite??
    ''That's made it a top priority for Washington, our defense capabilities and ultimately our national security'' Again Framing, the part of ''important for military applications'' is now framed in such a way that the Viewer is made felt that the US Government is doing it for noble and legitimate reasons, i.e. defense and national security.
    Don't get it twisted, Russia, Usa and China are the biggest Threats to the World and Mankind and have been already since the end of WW2. To think that any of these are not interested in Hypersonic tech for aggressive and offensive Military use is delusional, but all of them are also interested in use in other fields.

    • @keithteo9007
      @keithteo9007 2 роки тому +6

      That is absolutely true. You also see clip after clip of civilian US technologies, it's very easy to forget that by far the biggest owner of hypersonic weapons - and far more destructively - is the US and its nuclear ICBM arsenal. And the incredible thing is that unlike most nuclear countries the US has never pledged to a no first use policy. In other words, the US might destroy the world at any time if it considers it strategically advantageous.

  • @808zhu
    @808zhu 2 роки тому +47

    How about prioritizing providing for the basic needs of all humanity and not turning the planet into a radioactive bomb crater over arms races?

    • @joeldavis5815
      @joeldavis5815 2 роки тому +2

      Amen.

    • @omarrendon2480
      @omarrendon2480 2 роки тому +1

      Same thought. I have always reckoned that progress doesn't mean reaching the space, it is about guaranteeing a dignified life for everyone.

    • @iconsumedmt1350
      @iconsumedmt1350 2 роки тому +2

      All our basic needs are met. Global top 1% income is less than 40k, which almost all Americans surpass when you factor in checks from the govt to lower income Americans.

    • @sierrawhiskey5155
      @sierrawhiskey5155 2 роки тому +2

      Go tell it to your Socialist friends in China. The Russians are terrified that Western Socialists are going to force their agenda onto their post-Socialist, conservative society.
      Hypersonic flight doesn't involve nuclear fuel or weapons.
      The basic needs of humanity will never be met as long as Socialists in the US propel massive population growth throughout the 3rd world with "aid".

    • @808zhu
      @808zhu 2 роки тому +1

      @@iconsumedmt1350 Then why are there homeless and starving people worldwide? 🤔

  • @johnfields6272
    @johnfields6272 2 роки тому

    We were to worried more about which bathroom to use instead of about these weapons. Our priorities were not on order so now we have to play catch up!

  • @untitled8450
    @untitled8450 2 роки тому

    Teleprompters need innovation, not a niche market.