ScarJo is upset with OpenAI!!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 тра 2024
- 🔗 Links 🔗
Lawyers for Scarlett Johansson are demanding that OpenAI disclose how it developed an AI personal assistant voice that the actress says sounds uncannily similar to her own.
Johansson's legal team has sent OpenAI two letters asking the company to detail the process by which it developed a voice the tech company dubbed "Sky," Johansson's publicist told NPR in a revelation that has not been previously reported.
Scarlett Johansson statement - www.npr.org/2024/05/20/125249...
OpenAI rebuttal - openai.com/index/how-the-voic...
❤️ If you want to support the channel ❤️
Support here:
Patreon - / 1littlecoder
Ko-Fi - ko-fi.com/1littlecoder
🧭 Follow me on 🧭
Twitter - / 1littlecoder
Linkedin - / amrrs - Наука та технологія
"Scarlett Johansson worried about Identity theft!" Well Sam Altman is about to destroy everybody's career with Sora in a few years.
She rejected a most lucrative business, using her voice only, now that she is less young than in the early days of her career, most centered in her body. Luckily she is not the only sexy voice on the planet.
"Sky’s voice is not an imitation of Scarlett Johansson but belongs to a different professional actress using her own natural speaking voice. To protect their privacy, we cannot share the names of our voice talents."
This is suspect. Normally, voice talent is openly credited.. you know, so the artist can be recognized and get more work in the future.
The voice of Siri was not thus recognized for a long time. In fact, the only reason she found out is because a fellow voice actor thought Siri sounded like her.
I'm going to miss the Sky 😆 I really hope we get it back at some point
It’s an independent person according to them.
What’s brutal about this is like it’s kinda like physical game media disappearing. The classic example being GTA:IV losing its iconic radio songs (at least for a while) because of licensing issues, or Alan Wake being unlisted as well. Playing a game with a different soundtrack years later is missing that connection to it.
In this case, since the very inception of sky and back-and-forth verbal communication, I’ve had many many conversations, especially while on a long walk alone about all sorts of things with custom GPT I created . And no, I’m not talking about dirty stuff. I’m talking about using ChatGPT with her voice as a way of bouncing ideas off and thinking in different directions, including mental health and addiction stuff.
Now that voice is gone and I had no control over its leaving…
Ridiculous, i would make my own Scarlett jhohanson AI voice and use it wherever i want.
Releasing it on the internet is going to get you sued - see the recent case when somebody made a show featuring the voice of George Carlin.
He is dead now, but his estate sued and won.
James Earl Jones licensed his Darth Vader voice to Disney for a yearly fee into perpetuity even when he passes away.
It seems you need to read up on how the law works around using a person's likeness for gain unless it is protected speech like parody purposes.
@@tibbydudezaDrake and Tupac estate. 💯 but let people think they can be continuously harmful with new ai tech… just expect a future dystopia if we even survive to that point.
@@TheeRebelAltman really has dubious character - when he was at YCombinator a lot of people remarked he was much alike Sam Bankman Fried from FTX.
Messianic complex with flexible morality.
I don't believe that it is Scarlett Johansson. As a non-american, I can definitely hear the difference in accent
It is an AI voice trained on her voice - same thing - the thing is the law states that if people BELIEVE it to be her voice, then you have an issue.
There is a legal precedent for this when Ford used a voice over artist to impersonate Bette Midler in a commercial without her consent.
Think of rap/hip-hop sampling - Sting makes money every time they that play Puff Daddy/Mase song about Tupac.
@@tibbydudeza cool. I understand now. Thanks for the clarification.
@@tibbydudeza 1st unless ScarJo proves it is a clone of her voice, making such statements of fact is grounds for legal suit against you. Even ScarJo is not implicitly stated it is in fact a clone of her her voice and her legal team did not in fact send a cease and desist letter to my knowledge. In the US you have to prove guilt, NOT prove innocence. 2nd, in the case of Ford, it was using the phony likeness as an endorsement of their product and NOT identifying the public that it was NOT the actual person. That is HUGE difference to this Open AI situation. Open AI has publicly stated that it is not ScarJo and the AI voice is tamber and personality is not endorsing the product as a quasi sales person. 3rd sampling is an exact recorded copy of the original work. IF it is an actual clone of ScarJos voice OpenAI is wrong and should simply move on. If it is another sound a like woman I hope they fight it. If it is a clone, they should squash it but I hope they simply do a world wide casting call to find a near identical sound like and challenge it with the new woman taking an active role in the forefront calling out ScarJo directly suggesting she is preventing her another fellow woman from being herself and working. That would be a PR disaster for ScarJo.
Maybe the best approach is letting people upload a clip with the voice they fancy. Then, she cannot blame openAi. She would have to blame us all, that love her voice. And we can crowdfund to pay her ;-)
I don't know why they have taken this down. People can and do have similar voice styles. One other point, do you think it will be possible to turn the level of personality down when this feature becomes available? I enjoyed the demos but think that level of inflection will become very tedious when you are just asking a simple question expecting a simple answer.
Money grab
From the demostrations you certianly can tell it to be more direct, but I have no Idea if you can cange any setting or have any permanent personal additions to the system prompt to tell it to tone it down.
@@DefaultFlame hope it will be possible within the settings as that kind of over the top interaction is not something I would enjoy using. It even annoys me when an AI uses an emoji lol. I'm probably not alone in thinking this way.
@@Serifinity I don't mind the inflection in the demo, though it's a bit over the top, but I really dislike AIs using emoji. One once in a while to express emotion I'll give a pass, but any that uses them liberally is just annoying.
Bad optics
I agree with Scarlett,all the ai companies are Just stealing voices, text, pictures, movies and arts etc.
What a stupid world we live in a voice is a voice, who actually cares. They didn't use her voice anyway. Lots of people sound the same. Were will this stuff end, every woman will sue for likeness every time a image is generated in stable diffusion. Come on really :(
It wasn't even that a unique voice, I personally thought it was stereo typical voice service.
I understand why "Open"Ai don't want to disclose actor they trained AI voice with, although would I be that actor I'd probably do so, that would be kinda funny to ruin all people's bs.
But...In reality I do think they just mixed Skarlet's voice with someone else's - that would explain everything.
Nah, Sam just fears the Widow bite
Bro thinks he is funny
Funny thing, but scam callers dropping the call exactly after 1 sec if no answer to "hi", knowing that copy of their voice possible only after 3 sec for now.
I dont really feels like its too similar, more better result could have been generated wit rvc
Ridiculous scandal. OpenAI could easily generate a unique voice that sounds far better than Scarlett or any of these other obnoxious, self-important celebrities. They should ditch the voice actors entirely. ElevenLabs has a ton of incredible AI-generated voice models.
That’s objective… you realize this right?
@@TheeRebel That would be subjective... you realize this right?
She has a right to her own voice. Saying they can’t use another person’s voice because it sounds similar is just narcissistic and anti-competitive.
Love the title 🤣😂
I was thinking about " he pissed her off" as well
@@1littlecoderBetter, but sounds dark 😂
Meh, if it is NOT her voice, they really should not take it down. That basically tells the original (unnamed) voice actor who's voice they actually used, that all she is is a copy of someone else, and no longer marketable.
So,out of "respect" for the original voice actor, they really should put "Sky" back up... and stop acting like they did something wrong.
(Unless they really did use the voice without asking) hehe
Well done to her - she is an artist and her voice (very lovely in "Her") is her work - consent is need - I hope the law deals with AI fakery.
depends if it is indeed a clone of her voice. Are you suggesting anyone famous should be able to stop another person from working just because they have a similar voice or appearance?
Good thing we have you to stick up for these obnoxious, self-important, grossly pampered celebrities. Perhaps you should stop using ChatGPT as a protest in her defense. You know, until they stop abusing poor little Scarlett and pay her the bazillion dollars she so obviously deserves for her raspy, mediocre voice. 🙄
@@vickmackey24 She is worth it because Marvel simps like you sadly exists - they can throw any slop on the screen, and you will go watch it.
I am more of film buff who like real movies with proper acting and dialogue and story.
It is obvious not her voice. Scarlett is definitely projecting
@@justcallmebrian793 Well Altman referenced it directly in a tweet and the fact that they approached her twice for permission.
A lot of people commented on how it reminded them of ScarJo performance in the movie Her - the law says if people (see the general public reference from her lawyer in the statement) believe it then it does not matter how it was made.
That was enough legal argument for them to pull it and not get sued.
Nope it does not sounds like Scarlett Johansson
Its from her
Do you believe so?
@@1littlecoder People compared with the movie her. ScarJo voiced the AI companion there. Its a cheap trick by OpenAI to pull this
woice, ovar da letesht wan, pattikular, eben forthar.... indians at their best :V
I stand with OpenAI and Sam Altman 🏳️🌈
Any particular reason?
Because he is gay @@1littlecoder
@@shobhitagnihotri416 that is their wish
Majority people thought vs minority people thought
Majority thought only win in every region .
@@1littlecoder Because the voice is obviously not Scarlett Johansson, and it does not even sounds like her. Many girls especially in Southern California sounds like that. I call her noise obvious hollywood BS!
ua-cam.com/video/Lstwp_DlXiU/v-deo.html
doesn't sound like scarlett Johansson at all.!
You could improve your speech. Your videos will be good if you sound good.
Any tips ?