You have to rewrite your scripts and get rid of all that gooey text. Also, stop attributing anything to the meaning of a piece of jewelry. Sufficient to say it was a gift from whomever. Your delivery also needs retuning. I think some of your facts are not correct.
seven hours old and needs to go back for edit and script rewrite badly... thumb down hope they get rid of the repetitive volumtous thesaura that adds nothing to the script but drags it down.. badly...
The piece that you call a brooch was a stomacher, which was an old fashion form of jewelry worn on the bodice of A woman’s gown this piece was attachable to make into purchase, but it was originally a stomacher get it right the first time
The coronation was in 1953, so those images are not from 1952 when she ascended to the throne. She became queen at the death of her father but was crowned and anointed at the coronation.
If you’re going to make a video for millions to see get the information right her grandmother was not Maria of Tech, she was Princess Mary of Teck, Mary was born in England. She was the daughter of an English princess Mary, Adelaide of Cambridge, who married Francis of Teck.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that our late queen, Elizabeth II was not given to wearing copious amounts of jewellery. For formal occasions, she wore a tiara, earrings, a diamond necklace, a dainty watch, and honours on her sash if she wore one. Pearls were her favourite choice for day to day wear. What I'm getting at is that I can't believe that she would wear that 3-tiered monstrosity of a pendant, together with a diamond necklace. It was just not her style. Or so I believe. However, please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
I so agree with the first comment I hope this is robotic narration, because if it isn't the person narrating really needs to learn to speak properly and get their facts straight.
This is an example of absolutely awful AI scripting. In addition to being somewhat to wildly inaccurate, the AI voice is painful to listen to. Such a shame.
There is nothing secret about these jewels. This video is full of errors and ridiculous statements. The breathy voice and the saccharine text are repulsive.
Elizabeth II was not the daughter of Queen Mary. She was her granddaughter, just one of many mistakes in this video.
note they are showing multiple pieces claiming it to be one... the flower brooch..this is bad and not historically accurate...
You have to rewrite your scripts and get rid of all that gooey text. Also, stop attributing anything to the meaning of a piece of jewelry. Sufficient to say it was a gift from whomever. Your delivery also needs retuning. I think some of your facts are not correct.
AI?
AI
seven hours old and needs to go back for edit and script rewrite badly... thumb down hope they get rid of the repetitive volumtous thesaura that adds nothing to the script but drags it down.. badly...
The piece that you call a brooch was a stomacher, which was an old fashion form of jewelry worn on the bodice of A woman’s gown this piece was attachable to make into purchase, but it was originally a stomacher get it right the first time
THANK YOU. I've seen this piece a number of times before and they never get it right.
You really should do your historical homework. This is full of mistakes.
The coronation was in 1953, so those images are not from 1952 when she ascended to the throne. She became queen at the death of her father but was crowned and anointed at the coronation.
If you’re going to make a video for millions to see get the information right her grandmother was not Maria of Tech, she was Princess Mary of Teck, Mary was born in England. She was the daughter of an English princess Mary, Adelaide of Cambridge, who married Francis of Teck.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that our late queen,
Elizabeth II was not given to wearing copious amounts of jewellery.
For formal occasions, she wore a tiara, earrings, a diamond necklace, a dainty watch, and honours on her sash if she wore one.
Pearls were her favourite choice for day to day wear.
What I'm getting at is that I can't believe that she would wear that 3-tiered monstrosity of a pendant, together with a diamond necklace.
It was just not her style. Or so I believe.
However, please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Terrible site...many historical errors
I so agree with the first comment I hope this is robotic narration, because if it isn't the person narrating really needs to learn to speak properly and get their facts straight.
Pearl mining? Really?
in the deepest depths of the ocean.. just one of the rewrites this volumistic error needs correcting..
Very interesting. I hope the Nizam of Hyderabad tiara still exist...
Mary of Teck was not Elizabeth II's mother. Elizabeth Bowes Lyon was.
This is an example of absolutely awful AI scripting. In addition to being somewhat to wildly inaccurate, the AI voice is painful to listen to. Such a shame.
Badly written, verbose and so many inaccuracies, even the pictures have been doctored...Badly Done...and deserves No Merit!!
Kindly check your facts & info before U babble nonsense 🤬🤬🤬
Horrible clickbait thumbnail!
What you call the mary of teck is a stomacher
At the end of days this will have no value or meaning !
There is nothing secret about these jewels. This video is full of errors and ridiculous statements. The breathy voice and the saccharine text are repulsive.
This voice is so annoying and there are too many problems with your script , get your details before posting
George VIN..he wasn't a CAR
good job.
Tĥere are a lot of things stated in this video which are just plain *wrong.* A lot of bunkum. 👎