Piracy Really Can Be Justified
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 гру 2023
- With company's increasingly treating there customers bad, the question comes up, Is piracy always wrong or can it be justified? Its no secret that the user experience for pirates is better then for paying customers. The more company's do this the more people justify piracy.
Sponsored links
VIP-SCDKey.com
25% off discount code: CyberCPU
▬ Windows 10 Pro (16USD): biitt.ly/vbLzK
▬ Windows 11 Pro(23USD):biitt.ly/FAS2Z
▬ Windows 10 Home (15USD): biitt.ly/zKc1C
▬ Office 2019 Pro (49USD):biitt.ly/XL8Rj
▬ Office 2021 Pro (57USD): biitt.ly/2wSZd
Please Like this video and Subscribe to my channel
ua-cam.com/users/cybercpu?sub_...
My shirt from the video
www.cybercputech.com/productd...
Links from video:
Louis Rossmann (Piracy is COMPLETELY justified: Louis tries NetFlix & remembers why)
• Piracy is COMPLETELY j...
#Piracy # #Tech - Наука та технологія
If buying isn't owning, then piracy isn't stealing.
No more buying or owning... it's all renting now.
@@hd-be7dii mean physical media exist that's buying and owning
@@MtFoxt There's almost nothing left on physical media it's all cloud based online account pay forever or lose your stuff.
I bought Tenet on Apple's platform, for $25. Now, I can't access it anymore, without a subscription. And if they remove the film from the platform, it's gone for good.
I went back to buying films on Blu-ray.
Very well said.
It's not piracy. It's Archiving off-line without being asked. It's a thankless Job!
Yup, I'm recently finished downloading my entire GOG Library to my local nas hard drive. It came out to 7TB of space 😄
Exactly. One of the things he didn't mention was that content can disappear and reappear later asking you to buy it again. Like how Disney takes their movies off the market, then releases them again later on in some new special edition packaging. That nonsense is why people keep what they bought in format they will always have access to it.
@@gwgux 🙂 yup, on GOG lego star wars is now delisted, dont know why
Finally someone said it!
Yep. Lods of stuff not available any more due to woke crap.
"Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem"
~ Newell
He's a bit of a hypocrite after all we can't inherit a steam library like you can a record collection or house.
Maybe. I know if all movies were a $1, I'd buy everything even if I only thought I might want to watch it someday.
He should maybe listen to his own quote haha..
If it is 1 dollar I would still pirate it because I don't like giving my credit card.
Google sophistry.
To be fair, most "content" today isn't even worth pirating.
True. Back in the early 2000s, I had the computer on day and night pirating stuff. Now I only visit the torrent sites every couple of months on average. There just isn't that much I want to get these days.
Not really. There are a lot of tv series and movies in retail BD or dvd 9 format that are really worth having and which normally would cost a fortune.
Same goes for PC games too. I pirated cyberpunk 2077, played it, buggy as it was upon release, i still liked it and then after i pirated it, i bought it. I do this with PC games frequently because i believe that if a PC game is good enough for me to like it and even play it multiple times, then yes, the devs deserve my hard earmed cash. And this goes for any PC game in the action RPG category that i like.
More and more publishers expect people to jump through ever steeper hoops and pay monthly subscriptions for a software LICENCE that they claim they can revoke at any time for any reason they deem, and they call pirates the thieves.
Yes, technically its a lease, almost all video games are like that, consoles are going that way as well. You will own nothing and Love it.
that's because the people using the product other than with the agreement of the owners ARE thieves
@@MrSamadolfo you might own nothing, but I got it all backed up on 20tb of hard drives.
@@MrSamadolfotbh people will find a way to crack it and find the games that is been released and dump it for archive of the software is not longer licence or abandoned then people have right to hack it and use it as public domain
@@MrYuck-ec5do yes. Good idea.
"Remember, pirating adobe software's is always morally correct."
they WANT you to pirate it for home use.. its so it becomes industry standard
You're forgetting that companies and services are shutting down and taking your paid for online content with them.
Or Sony just doesn't want to pay for the licensing and you lose it that way lol
@@FerinaAryele Without Refundung, which makes way worse
and this is why physical media is better sometimes
Which is why i never buy digital goods unless necessary UNLESS they're DRM free and downloadable. For music, i'm currently building a nice collection of vinyls to play. For movies, i still buy DVDs and BR-Disks
buying ? what wrong with you
Anytime I hear about, "programmers need to be paid to put food on the table", or "studios need to pay their staff", I remember how much money most of these companies have going in to them and how much of it does not actually go to the good people who do the actual work to make the game, movie, or what ever. I have zero sympathy for those companies. I do feel for the indie companies with very small teams just trying to make their way through the big shadows cast by the big companies, but they're the exception, not the rule, and usually are not the ones making thing hard on us to buy what they made.
True. So just pirate AAA content and pay for indie content. That's what i would do, except there have been no AAA content worth the bandwidth in years so i just stick to purchasing indie content
But even then if I am a developer for a big company, it's okay to steal the content, because your stealing from a rich company, that trickles down companies will not lose their bottom line. They will take money out of their employees mouths before that happens, so I could lose pay or worse my job because you are spiteful of a wealthy company, and they don't make their bottom dollar, but it's okay. All I have to do is go work for an indie company that one flop could tank the entire company and I have no job.
@@acarlton5working for a big corporation doesn't automatially make your job more stable, quite the opposite, as a code monkey, you would be easier to replace...
Also: you're not a freelancer, it's not your job to serve or expect anything from your customers. Your employer is supposed to do that.
Like, if I buy a brand logo for my new company, but said company fails, regardless of the reason, would I just be entitled to get my money back or pay the artist less for it? no. The employee just did their job...
yup, most of these companies have all their employees salaried, and expect 60 or more hours a week. If their employees just worked 35 to 50 hours a week, most of them would be making $30 to $40 an hour, but when they work 60 to 80 hours for the same pay, it's closer to minimum wage, and that's if your minwage in your state is $15 -- in a lot of places it's a LOT less. Anyway, where do all those profits go? Usually to the CEO and the other execs on the board, or to shareholders.
If paying programers was true, why is it that FREE mods for existing games made by awesome people are often far better than the base game?
Examples include:
STALKER
Kerbal Space Program
Skyrim
Minecraft
X3 AP
Star Wars: Empire At War
7 Days TO Die
Fallout
And the list goes on and on and on.....
All the games I listed have VAST lists of FREE mods that can be downloaded from legit websites that can make your game exponentially better and add 100s or even 1000s of hours of content.
All done by people that just love the game.
Yet, big corporations still try to guilt people with the lie that "we need to pay our programers and producers"...
Repeat after me! If buying isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing!!!
And if piracy IS stealing, then deleting stuff off someone's computer without a direct order to do so is property destruction.
Whenever this issue comes up, I always mention the famous Gabe Newell quote: "Piracy is not a pricing issue. The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work. It’s by giving those people a service that’s better than what they’re receiving from the pirates."
"There's no profit in that". Why do you think JP Morgan quit backing Nicola Tesla in lieu of backing the THIEF Thomas Edison
So that would be free, right? Otherwise what’s the point?
@@christophervanzetta Free, if inconvenient, is only better if paying for it is as, or more inconvenient.. Piracy has become drastically more efficient than just *buying* a game.. but it has not become more convenient in others.. Modding some games for example without a valid steam copy is unreasonably inconvenient.. and for some people, modding the game is the whole reason they picked it up.. Sure you have the nexusmods and etc out in the ether, but what if the game you're playing only has mods on the steam workshop? you have to find a workaround to it which is painfully inconvenient, or actually own the game on steam at which point modding becomes a point and click adventure of your own whims and any inconvenience is a result of your internet service and hardware, not the game provider, or steam...
@@christophervanzetta why would it be free? steam is the literal example of how a good service makes people ok with paying for games and content. This is why people ignore games that aren't on steam: because they're not on a platform that's actually good.
I used to pirate a lot of games, but steam convinced me it was worth investing due to how good the platform is. Of course, i avoid new releases because they're always broken on PC but i buy tons of indie games every year thanks to steam and GOG. I don't actually mind paying for the content i find interesting as long as the platform that distributes it, is good.
Some companies are literally asking people to pirate their stuff because of their terrible business practices.
Kevin Smith and Dogma is one example.
@@thezfunk Sony and Adobe are two other examples where people can no longer use the stuff that they already paid for.
Fun fact shortly after metallica sued napster I downloaded every single song they ever made, burned them to dozens of DVDs and handed them out at college for free on the bargain that they would in turn upload and seed all of it for at least a month. I'd like to think I costed them at least a few $$$. Last I checked at least a few of those torrents are still alive and active.
That's hilarious. Good work👍
I'm a pirate, always have been. Having nothing to eat but hardtack while out at sea and getting scurvy from lack of vitamin C has been a problem though.
🙂 yup me too, Ahoy Mi Mateys Ahoy! 😄⛵
Buy your software and some Limes. You'll be a better person.
@@occamraiserNo.
yarrrr
It's sarcastic to see WINDOWS KEY BUYING STORE sponsoring a PIRACY IS JUSTIFIED video . 😂😂😂
Microsoft is fine with those sites. Just means more data for them to steal and sell.
yeah, these keys aren't legit even if working
@@EasyGameEh if micro$oft had an issue with the sites, they would have shut them down 10 years ago
@@EasyGameEh Umm they probably are legit. Its just that the bulk order that was generated was not intended to be sold like that.
Yeah MS is getting their chunk of cash on the license purchase. I suspect that they don't care as long as a sale was made. Its not as if its a keygen where they aren't making a sale.
I have zero scruples about ripping off companies that make a practice of ripping off their customers.
AMEN
As soon as I realized none of these companies would hire me despite me being more qualified than 95% of their employees, I lost any and all sympathy and respect for their "rights". Why should I respect a private social club that treats me like $hit?
Considering what Sony pulled with Discovery, Piracy of Sony is justified.
That is discovery's fault, my guy. Discovery wanted to charge more, sony said no, people rebelled, sony paid the asking price, and you blamed sony.
@@maliciousfrySony should have done a better job of negotiating / creating the original contract so their customers wouldn't be screwed over.
@@utubepunk It's okay that you don't understand how licensing works but don't be naive.
@@maliciousfry Bro, people literally lost access to their stuff. Even if Sony couldn't "negotiate better", they should've at least partially refunded the purchases. Like 80% refund of $300 paid is still better than d*ck nothing.
@@whohan779 I reiterate it's okay to not understand licensing. Direct your anger appropriately tho.
I remember buying PC Prince of Persia 2008. It didn't have DRM. You could even play the game without the disc. It was really awesome to buy the game and get playing without worrying about DRM stuff or having to get the crack.
😊 yup, I have all the old titles that are available on GOG, all are downloaded, all are drm free, the game i personally prefer is the one you are talking about, its available on GOG, Prince of Persia 2008 by Ubisoft Montreal, I like it cause its easy, your GF saves u when u fail a platform jump
gamecopyworld
This is why i prefer to buy on GOG when possible. DRM free games are a relief and i' amazed the platform is still alive to be frank. I was certain it would go bankrupt before 2024 due to its market share being really low.
agree, its strange tho even now in 2023 you dont really hear people promoting gog or mentioning that the games are drm free and shareable, its like taboo to mention such things, also I never hear anyone mention preloading a new gaming pc with a few gog games to get the new gamer ready to go, strange @@user-us6ft2sj5q
One of the funnest lines I heard when people were on Limewire downloading music and software was, you're stealing don't you feel bad about that?, you wouldn't steal a car would you? and the response was if I could there would be two Jaguars and a Porsche out in the driveway.
If property theft worked like piracy, the seller would still have both the Jaguars and the Porsche that they could still sell to someone who was willing to pay for it in the first place.
the resolution restriction and the limit of users watching at the same time is what made me stop paying Netflix. They're basically charging more for less
That was always the plan. 😄
the only reason I have a legit netflix account is be cause it comes bundled with my mobile phone service.
I no longer have or miss Netflix. But the 4K only on four streams was very annoying? I'm glad they made me realise I don't need them. Shame others didn't so much?
As a Linux user I'm perfectly happy to pirate photoshop until Adobe give me the official option to pay for it.
i had to ask. arch?
Not a linux user but that’s a valid argument. Nothing beats Adobe and I’ve tried a ton of alternatives, free and paid
@@cheeseburgersuperior1874 Fedroa. Can't be arsed with Arch.
It's just baffling how it's come to this. How stupid humanity is, to keep giving away what little control they've had in the consumer space, in exchange for minor convenience.
If you are a pirate, yesterday, today, tomorrow, I couldn't care less at this point. These companies are the worst pirates of all.
I have no qualms about pirating. The lack of DRM on music can be directly attributed to the rampant pirating of music in the early 2K's. Most folks forget how insane the DRM was in the late 90's early 2K's. Up to and including lockouts from playing a CD on a PC.
I stopped giving a single shit about pirating movies and TV shows after back in 2010, I think, I was on Netflix. I watched the first few episodes of Stargate Atlantis, logged off, then back on later that week and it was gone.........This crap has only gotten worse over time. Now not only does content move to each damn studio having their own service but now they outright remove content never to be seen again. Disney is the worst offender but WB is right up there. Enter: Plex. Part of Plex was the afore mentioned issue, but also when you have 5K DVD/BR's filling an entire damn room, it becomes an issue.
I have so much content at this point it is borderline impossible I will ever watch it all. That said it isn't as if I haven't given all the studios a huge chunk of cash.....I sat down and crunch the numbers on the amount of money I've spent on VHS, DVD, BR, and Amazon digital content over the decades. (That I all buy and rip.) Not kidding when I say I could by a BMW. It is easily midrange 5 figures.
All I know is I have content that will probably never see the light of day ever again. pepe le pew is a perfect example.....I agree with folks who HATE the behavior of this character. But put a disclaimer on it, not remove it outright. There are MANY other examples of this where content just goes poof. Or the director or studio feels the need to dick with a release putting out a new edition. *coughs*Lucas*coughs*
I consider my Plex system as much archive as entertainment center. And frankly it's the equivalent of a baseball card collection. Do I need 8000 movies and 600 TV shows spanning from Roundhay Garden Scene of 1888 to The Velveteen Rabbit released a few months back? (At about 68TB of space being consumed.) No. I just like the idea I have the equivalent of Star Trek's LCARS. It has EVERYTHING. So if someday I'm watching something on UA-cam and they reference an obscure movie.....go to Plex....have it. Watch it. Perfect example of this: Hawk Jones.....I went out and purchased the DVD and ripped it. I now have this unique movie in my collection. It looks like the content owner is burning DVD's on a per order basis. Someday they will stop that and that content may no longer be available.
But also: I cut the cord because of paying for content I could not give a single crap about. Now that all these studios have taken their ball and gone and built their own streaming service....we are EXACTLY back in the same situation as cable. I'm not spending $15 a month on A single service just to get one show. Where the combined total would be fast approaching $100 a month for 25 shows I want to watch on and off. No. When Netflix was licensing from everyone I could subscribe to that service and have everything.........No longer. So these studios, outside Sony who smartly stayed out of these streaming BS, can all F right off.
At least it looks like we will get a few streaming services merging. I think HBO is merging with Discovery, and Paramount with SkyShowtime. Plus Disney is merging with Hulu.
>outside Sony who smartly stayed out of these streaming BS
Wrong. Sony Pictures has Crunchyroll.
When pirating content is easier and more beneficial for users than paying for content, the industry seriously needs to pause, look at its methodology, come together and resolve the situation.
I paraphrase "If it is easy to steal then it is legitimate to steal" - Do you even pay for your groceries if the shopkeeper isn't looking?
@@occamraiserEveryone needs food, we don’t need content 😂
@@occamraiser What if those groceries came with a mandatory sign-up to a store account, you the buyer can only eat them, and you can only eat a few at a time ?
Spot on! Companies forget why they exist - it's because of their customers, not despite them.
What I hate is DRM, If I buy a game on Steam or Epic I should be able to simply play it right away after downloading instead of being forced into Rockstar's launcher, Ubisoft's Launchet, EA's Launcher, etc... Pirate's will have a better experience than people like me who actually pay to use it
Edit: I posted this before the video was over lol I didnt know if you were going to mention it or not
🙂 yup, I try to remember to launch both epic and ubisoft or ea, or both steam and ubisoft or ea, before pressing play. On GOG i only use GOG Galaxy. Theres so many other launchers out there that I haven't tried yet such as Rockstar or BattleNet or some of the other Free to Play games, I think Star Citizen too has their own launcher. I really dont know how many are out there now. Its crazy.
bought ME legendary edition on steam, first thing that wanted to launch was the EA origin replacer app they have made now.
YARR, its been a decade since I've sailed the seas, cracked all four of em.
F you EA!
Games as a service is fraud- accursed farms here on youtube
@@xerr0n 🙂 i have the EA Launcher, i dont like sports games but they have a couple of exclusives that i think are ok such as Star Wars games, yes I saw that ME Legend is only 6 buks, it looks cool but im not good at crouching for cover, it reminds me of Gears of War which is also cool but i know i suck, i wish all games give u a God Mode option
@@xerr0n 🙂 i pu Battlefield Hardline, and u cant launch it, its asking for a website that doesnt exist anymore, theres probably a workaround but I dont understand why EA doesnt update the game to look for their current launcher, it cant b that hard
@@MrSamadolfo and that my sir is exactly the premise of the video i mentioned at the end of my last comment.
if the (especially singleplayer) game requires a server or whatever outside resource to even start and that server or service goes down, then companies should be forced to release an executable that does not require them.
BUT no that requires accountability and WORK, whos gonna Pay for that!
it certainly aint gonna be the companies who have milked their customers for years, just go but a new game they released.
Like Starfield, it just works.(The Chalkeaters)
Perhaps the modders get it finished in a few years.
I'm 50 and I still pirate whatever I can.
I cut the cord to flow tv years ago, and now I'm cutting streaming services off too. I refuse to pay all that money, just to sit and wait for an episode each week. STREAMING = BINGE WATCHING.
People pirate video games because more and more they're being made to where you can only play them online. But the pirated version of the game has a patch within the crack that makes it so you can play the game at any time. Even for some games that I've purchased that otherwise require an internet connection for a single player game, I cracked them so that I can play them should I ever end up without an internet connection. Something that happens fairly often in my home state due to hurricanes and storms.
I had a drum virtual instrument for making music, and the DRM was so annoying that I ended up pirating software I already bought and paid for just to use it. There have been several instances with single player games requiring constant online checks, where I bought the game on Steam or wherever, and then just installed a crack as if I had pirated it so that the game would actually be playable above 20 fps, or for older games so I could play on a widescreen. Then don't even get me started on Amazon and Sony rescinding movies from users that were PURCHASED because their contract with the publisher ended, and they didn't give a refund. If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing.
Yes! This is so on point! Take notes big tech! You're shooting yourself in the foot by making software/media so inaccessible. Another reason to pirate content is when media simply isn't available for purchase in your region, just because. It's so annoying.
There's another point about piracy you only briefly mentioned. People have to believe the price is fair, or even a bargain. If they feel they are being ripped off, they are much more likely to turn to the high seas. DRM even comes into play with this, because if someone purchases a product, then they will want to use that product on all of their devices. If they can't do that, then it's likely they'll feel ripped off, and once again the temptation is to turn to piracy to solve their problems.
My parents have recently been pissed about Netflix gating their login behind an ip wall since they aren't married anymore. Shit is annoying even to normies
Honestly so many companies are getting very greedy implementing a monthly payment system for all of their products .. there’s an engineering software that was 300$ one time payment when it’s first launched,, now it adopted the monthly bs system and it will cost users 2700$/year so yeah piracy is justified against corporate greed .
Devs, studios, companies... everybody wants ALL the money. Not a little. Not a lot. ALL the money.
Look at sony/etc, during the first days of psn. 'Ohhh, the digital items should cost much less. There's no longer a retailer... a store... a warehouse... no, it's just psn-->purchase--> user."
Well, today, digital games cost even more than physical ones. Even 10yo call of duty games are still being sold at 50 bucks or more !
Then, the software...
2 decades ago, you, as a company, had to create your app. Had to package it. Send it to so ne retailer. The retailer had to buy several copies... had to display them... had to store them... had to advertise them, had to pay for ads in the newspapers, magazines, etc... had to keep all the customers and sales records... had to package them, and pay for the delivery service... the package could then be lost... could be stolen... etc etc etc. And let's not forget the electricity... water.. rent... for that store...
2023, the same software:
- the devs/ company make the app
- they create a simple online store, (great 100% free solutions do exist) , upload their app to the catalog (with a side database with serial numbers) , and that's all folks
- the app can now be sold 10, 10'000 or 500'000 times, for no extra cost
- if the app has many bugs, the company will fix only a few, won't listen to the features requests, and will later sell a v2 update, or a full v2 upgrade
That app could easily be sold for, eg, $49 , because there no longer are all those fees, like rent, transportation, etc... but the devs/ company decide to sell it for $499... or you can also rent it via a $22 monthly subscription !
They will sell tens of thousands of copies, and will make millions... and one day, they find our their app has been cracked, and it's the end of the world.
Now, they will start whining, because they are making less sales because of the evil pirates !
When in reality, only 1000 or 2000 people will use the cracked version, compared to the +100'000 legit sales.
Greed..greed...greed
Software development.... gaming industry.... all the same
As a veteran of the Napster days, "Welcome to the party."
I'm usually anti piracy, But with the crap companies are pulling lately such as Sony just on a whim taking away peoples purchased movies etc, Along with Lionsgate (in the UK) suddenly deciding they're going to pull their service BUT only in the UK its getting annoying, People WANT to pay and support the industry but they're making it very hard to and wonder why people resort to piracy..
Piracy will never be completely elminated
It's not even partially eliminated. It is bigger now than the days of Napster. It's just you don't hear about it because companies have pretty well given up trying to scare people from doing it. When was the last time you heard of some home user being prosecuted for movie or song theft ?
*my hat off for naming Louis Rossmann because he's been covering this many times*
People should start cancelling their streaming services that gouge. Thats the only way theyre going to learn a lesson.
Boycott.
Software companies needs to stop gouging. Again boycott. Dont buy from them.
Blu-Rays are the worst kind of spitting in your paying customer's face scam I've ever seen. The audacity to take your most valuable paying customers, the ones who've paid by far the most, and force ads and anti-piracy threats down their throat and then forcing them to use a very specific player and a very specific display is just mind blowing. The file size of Blu-Ray files by itself is probably enough of a copy-protection mechanism when it comes to giving it to friends and family. But it's like they just laugh at you for being so stupid to buy a legal copy instead of pirating it.
Of course picacy is about money. The money the producers imagine they are loosing from lost sales.
If people can't afford a product, or are finding it too expensive, they will look for less expensive options. Or find a way to pay less...
A reasonable analysis, I agree on most points. On music specifically, in my humble opinion, UA-cam, with all of its own perks, is what actually killed music piracy. During iPod's heyday, many users just download mp3 for free and copied them to their iPod (or cheaper MP3 player), rather than buying from Apple. Currently, the quickest cheapest (and legal) way to listen and share a Metallica song is searching on UA-cam and listening, which is quite ironic in hindsight. There are other music streaming services, of course, but that's mostly because they offer better UX, no ads, high sound quality and, most importantly, affordable prices and all music anyone could listen.
The problem is these publishers and distributors that can strip you from your legally bought content. Case in point, the recent discovery fiasco. Also, get banned from xbox, psn etc.? You'll lose all your content. They don't ban you from just accessing newer content, they completely prevent you from accessing what you've already bought.
"Take what you can, give nothing back."
That's 300% right !
Let's take 3 use cases:
1st one: videos (dvd, bluray).
I used to have (and still do) a massive collection of +1000 dvds, and several hundreds of blurays. I absolutely wanted and adored having those physical discs that i can use anytime i want, and i also wanted to give money to the industry, so they can keep on making all those movies i adore.
The problem ? Despite the manufacturing prices getting lower and lower, the industry kept charging a premium price. Then, second problem, i often watch my movies in 2 different languages other than english, depending who is around (foreign friends, foreign family members, etc ).
So, as a movies fan, i was paying a premium for those discs, and those discs were basically worthless : no bonus, no nothing, and the worst part, weak-ass audio tracks.
If you buy a movie for , eg, the italien, or French market, as a fan, who's paying a premium price, you should have the right to expect to find a , say, french, italien, etc 7.1 dolby atmos, master audio, etc. But no. For example, a french dude will buy a movie for the french are, and it will come with a absolutely fabulous English audio track, and a miserably poor french track. Absolutely 0 efforts made by the industry, for the fans.
2-Then, you have the video games. Up until 2005-ish, video games were about passion, devotion, etc, from a bunch of passionate devs, whose mission was creating the best game as possible, despite all the technical challenges. Everything was made, to please the gamer.
Then, after the iphone was released, some studios, like the candy crush makers, were making hundreds of millions, each month, and it started attracting the venture/hedge/capital/etc vultures, with their suitcases full of trillions, and their hoards of money thirsty leeches, who don't understand, don't like, and d don't give a crap about video games, and only care about money.
And suddenly, all big games started being made around.... MONETIZATION. It no longer matters, how fun, interesting, long, etc, the game is going to be, if doesn't matter if the characters are dumb and the main story is crap, and the world size was divided by 10... all that matters, is making sure the game will be filled with microtransactions, in-game purchases, season passes, etc, so the gamer not only pays 70 bucks for his game, but will have to use the credit card and spend another 300...800...or even $3000, in order to get the 'full experience'.
You loved a racing game like gran turismo 6, on the ps3, with 750 premium cars and at least 300 or 400 'less premium' models ? Welcome to the new gran turismo 7, with only 410 cars, where a gamer will have to win a race 100 times, just to earn 1 or 2 $ worth of in-game cash, when a single 'optional' car the gamer can buy with real money can readily cost 10, 20 or even $40 (real $).
Fuk those games, fuk this industry.
3- streaming. After countless advertisings, i finally decided to give netflix a try, as my first legit 'streaming' experience.
I said to myself, screw it, i will pay 10 or 15 bucks, if i manage to watch like 10 movies each month, 10 -15 bucks will be fine.
There are a ton of movies that i absolutely adore, from the 80s, 90s, 00s... all the old classics, etc... it's gonna be cool. So i enter my netflix card number, and voila, I'm subscribed.
I search 'shrek' --> only number 2 was available.
I search 'Sylvester Stallone ', or some of his movies --> almost 0 found
I search actors like Schwarzenegger, jason statam, etc --> little to nothing found
I search tens and tens of movies. 1 here...1 there...
Maybe old series like the old MacGyver? Maybe Stargate Sg-1 ? Prison break ? Dr house ? And many others : basically nothing.
I guess, netflix only has a few big titles, to attract the stupid idiot (like myself)... a few series... and that's all.
Add to all that, the woke cancer, where it is impossible , eg, to make a movie or cartoon for 3yo kids, without inserting 2 dudes kissing and rubbing eachother's cocks , or a kid and his 2 no-binary/lesbian moms , who must buy a sex toy for their asexual neighbor's 2yo adopted non-binary/tranz baby birthday.
Physical discs... video games... streaming...
I refuse to give 1 single dime to this awful industry.
I want to watch a movie ? In just a few minutes or seconds, websites like 'search extreme + download + movie', you can download up to .iso bluray images, 3d movies, everything !
Regarding the video games, there are over 20'000 titles, from older consoles like dreamcast, psvita, snes, genesis, atari, nes, n64, etc etc, where people can download a pc, android or even Linux emulators, to run all those games(roms), that we can download 1 by one, or even 2gygabytes packs with hundreds of titles.
If i want to watch some series, there are plenty of websites that offer that kind of services, for free k just a few ads here and there).
The gaming and video industry has 0 moral, 0 scruples, 0 dignity, 0 anything, regarding us, consummers/buyers. We are just a bunch of stupid walking wallets. Why should we care about them ? Why should we feel bad, about downloading a game or movie ?
Let's not forget, since the internet became faster and faster, the industry wettest dreams are : making everything 100% digital/cloud/subscription based... where the user owns absolutely NOTHING.
unfortunately, mainly because of the gen-z, who want everything, not next month, not next week or day, not tomorrow, but TODAY, who don't want to move their ass and go buy their game from a local store, and prefer getting everything online, because of them, the digital sales in video games were only a few %, a few years ago... today, it's already over 60%. It's just a matter of 2 or 3 years, before people can no longer buy a physical game, from the local store. The more the digital sales grows, the less physical games will be made and sold. By 2026, the digital games sales could be over 90%... and the next playstation 6 and Xbox 2 could be ... 100% digital- only !
When i buy a game, like dead Island 2, farcry 6, god of war ragnarok, etc, on the ps5, i buy the physical version. But while i buy the physical version, probably 70 gamers bought it from the online store. It's a list combat.
At least, by downloading my stuff, i won't be giving my money to those greedy companies.
People shouldn't feel bad for downloading a fukin movie for free.
Shit, when apple sells a $1200 iPhone, that probably only cost them $200 or less to manufacture, package, etc, where are the scruples, the morals, etc ? You can even expand the storage capacity, by adding a $20 sdxc card !
When the industry charges a premium for a device, talks about climate change and how they save the planet by not including a charger... but then, only offer a 24, or even 12 months warranty, where are the morals, the dignity, the respect, the scruples ?
The industry wants to do something for the planet ? Why not starting by.... offering a standard 5 or 6 years warranties ?
How many billions of electronic devices are thrown away, because the 24 or 12 months warranty was over, and it was too expensive to repair off warranty... with a 5 or 6 years warranty, those billions of devices would have a much longer life...! Which, of course, the industry doesn't want !
Yes, it's time for people to STOP feeling bad about downloading and watching a 'pirated' movie... or downloading and playing a +20yo video game !
The entertainment industry doesn't respect and doesn't give a phuq about us, so... why should people care !
For the 2 people who will read my rant, thank you, prayers will go to you, intelligent people !
Complains about wOKe cANcEr 🤪🤪🤪 then proceeds to lie. Is that you, Steven Crowder?
This reminds me of why I download UA-cam videos. There is too much disruptive advertising that UA-cam inserts into the videos. AND, some channels...cough, cough... embed ads into their videos which can be easily edited out. A bit of double dipping going on here. I like certain content which I download automatically with a virtual machine running 24/7 on my NAS which has a Subscriptions feature that skips the YT ads. And before you think I'm just some cheapskate, I send several hundred dollars to the publishers of my favourite YT channels and "free" software developers every year. This way, I know that my money goes to those people I want it to go to without a big chunk taken out by a third party.
Advocate for physical AND DRM-Free digital (like GoG) under the banner of *ownership*
The Digital Rights Act needs to be enhanced to allow forever full ownership options.
If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing.
If you already paid for something and the companies take it away, piracy isn't stealing, it's reclamation.
If what you want is literally not available for purchase, then it's not a lost sale if you pirate it.
I do tend to pay for things, but if companies screw around - take things away, not sell it at all, etc - I have absolutely no issue pirating things. As Gabe Newell famously said, piracy is a service problem. And the service has been steadily getting worse over the past few years.
I also _never_ subscribe to any content delivery services. No Netflix, no Spotify, nothing of that nature. I'm not going to pay these companies a monthly fee only to have absolutely nothing to show for it when I end my subscription. I buy things to own them, I'm not interested in rentals.
also legit gamers suffering because of Denuvo, by eating performances, while pirates enjoying games with full performance
Spyware?
@@galaxys8-ml no, it's basically heavy DRM
Jeff Geirlling (Gierling? IDK) also did a video in piracy.
I cant believe how large this movement is.
And no one is saying "we should just take what we want." Everyone is saying , "we should own what we buy."
Awesome video!
In the country that I currently live in all streaming services are geo blocked or has a seriously limited catalog. What choice do I have if not piracy?
If you wanted 1 song all you had to do is buy a 45 for .99 cent and play it on your record player.
um,he wasn't talking about songs on record at all
@@azurekite3870 I know i was talking about the way things use to be like he was and the way things have changed.
Once my friend bought a game CD, but we never managed to get it to work. Solution was to download a cracked version of this game and after unpacking it worked on the first time. No more buying broken BS.
Proud pirate from the BBS days and IRC channels. #Neverstop.
😏👍 2400 Baud Rate
@@MrSamadolfo We were hot stuff when 56.6k came along!
@@acesontilt77 😏 then 14,400 came around LOL
Funny after watching this video I just got an email from Amazon prime that they are going to place ads to their shows. To cut costs.
Unless I wanted to pay $2.99 a month for ad free streaming.
Thank you very much.
Sailing the Sevens Seas is a must today. DRM, Denuvo,, etc.
We quit cables a millions years ago because of their pricing and all, yet, the streaming companies are doing the same as cable and give another reason to sail the Seven Seas!
Yes, I do pirate games, especially the one with DRMs, but mostly I downloads games to try them and if I don't like them, I just delete them and voilà! No money wasted!
And also, sailing the Seven Seas is a must, especially for media preservations! Lots of physical medias are on the way out, sadly.
And one more thing, everything is becoming a subscription service..
"You'll own nothing and you'll be happy" -WEF
according to one person at Microsoft 'windows 95 wouldnt have been as popular if it werent for pirates'
Who never had a tape cassette with a recording from a friends vinyl LP back in the day?
The other thing that irritates me with Netflix, when you're browsing for something to watch it's just the same 10 shows over and over in a different order.
Piracy is a business like any other, it's just that customers don't wish to be served
ironically, that how actual pirate came to be because empires didn't respect and provide good services to their people.
More and More companies want memberships NOT ownership. You own no movies.. You buy a movie.. DOWNLOADING IT in 2k/4k/8k Nearly impossible without going through hoops.
Movies - Mentioned Above
Music - Same thing
Games - Now the same.. How DO YOU take your ownership from STEAM if you buy a game.. You cannot
Book
EVEN FREE TV now has DRM
Sadtly Digital ownership is harder now than ever.
WITHOUT the behaviors of the past we would have lost
everything prior to PC
Atari, C64, Apple II, Every MESS and MAME, Consoles, 99.9% which isn't only in Public Domain due to no longer being supported but no longer on running hardware. Its sad but early pirates became the achirvists and Data horders that made it an Archive.
Netflix be like is this man threating us
one of the MASSIVE issues with software anti piracy is publisher incompetence. Rockstars steam release of manhunt was pirated, and just didn't work.
Why? Good question.
well, if I pay to watch it in theater... then once the digital copy is available, ill download it, rewatched it and enjoy it. No questions ask! hahaha
I love this kinds of videos too Rich. Very good stuff.
3:09 Actually, I can. As I had a Creative Labs MP3 player which was roughly the same size, with 4 times the storage, and none of the draconian lockdowns that Apple garbage had.
So, ya...........
I bought Cubase 5 legit and I have the dongle somehwere but I just can't find it. So I use a cracked version of Cubase 5, I feel totally justified doing that.
In Africa, Paying in dollars just sounds bad to people, and PIRACY is the way to go
Bro you should advocate for piracy. It is good to share.
These publishers with anti piracy measures are the bad guys.
How about Sony giving the finger to the customers who PAID for TV series and are removing it from their servers.
That story broke after I filmed this video but you're right, that's another great example.
Great points all around, I buy all my audio plugins now, however, I have had multiple times where even the audio plugins i bought were restricted by some ilok activation issue or moving computers and only having a limited amount of activations that i can no longer transfer to a new computer and have to have some old non exisitent company deactivate them (still waiting months/years later). So then I yarged them. Waves is especially good at making users want to pirate their software. Plenty of other examples where activation problems occur all across video/audio/creative software.
" 'Piracy', for lack of a better word, is GOOD.
Piracy is right, piracy works. Piracy clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Piracy, in all of its forms; piracy to save a couple of bucks, piracy for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And piracy, you mark my words, will not only save all of us embattled tech enthusiasts, but the major malfunctioning corporation called the USA. Thank you very much."
-Long John Gekko
If I don't own my legally purchased game then pirating isn't stealing. It's reserving my games
I used to love those old commercials where they were like, "You wouldn't steal a car!" I was like, "You don't know me motherfucker!" The fact of the matter is, I look at digital content as completely valueless. If I can make a copy of something without paying for it, why would I trade money for it? I would rather spend that money on hardware. I can spend my money on terabytes of hard drives, and network attached devices to view my curated content.
I can watch all of the content that people pay money for, while not paying a dime for any of it. I can listen to any music I want, including things on release day in FLAC quality, all without actually spending money on it. I can play whatever video games I want, read all of the new books that come out, etc. In the past 25+ years that I have been using some method of piracy - I have probably saved about as much money as I spent to buy my house. If I could obtain physical objects with the same ease and impunity, I absolutely would do it.
All of that being said, I am not anti-capitalistic. I'm just not going to spend money on streaming services, just like I don't spend money on cloud storage, or anything else that's ostensibly just using someone else's computer. In the current era, where i can have a laptop with a multi-terabyte nvme drive in it or a terabyte MicroSD card in a phone, the idea of using streaming for inferior content seems pretty stupid; and especially when you add the cost component of it.
if buying is not owning then piracy is not theft.
Merry Christmas
I will never understand why companies keep trying to protect their products with DRM and such, only to frustrate their actually paying customers, when it's been clear as day for ages that there'll always be people who'll make a great effort to and ultimately succeed to crack these mechanisms. It's more difficult with the always-online scheme, sure, but that's also the ultimate turn-off from buying such products. If I can't buy a game free from DRM and always-online garbage, I simply won't buy it. There's more than enough games to play. I'll watch playthroughs on UA-cam before supporting such anti-consumer tactics. If I pay for something that's not a rental or a subscription, it'll be mine to own, and do with it whatever I want. And the argument that piracy takes food off the tables of people who make these products, I laugh at that. Almost all of these people are underpaid and overworked at the expense of their greedy overlords.
Economies can be self-balancing, if cable TV providers start charging too much then that's when people start stealing.
Steam ended support for xp and vista in 2019 and is set to end support for win 7 and 8 in 2024 meaning at some point even games designed for those os will stop working on steam without alot of backend work on the end users part.
hopefully the workaround wont be too bad, we will see.
I still use win7, no point in going to win10 because MS is ending support for that next year and win11 won't run on the old clunker. So I'll buy off GOG and get the full download version, no drm, no mandatory internet connection, no BS.
@@Paul_van_Doleweerd 🙂 yes thats a good point
I'm downloading repacked games, portable software, and movie mkv files of all my legally owned content/software.
1. Game repacks are lighter to download, don't need redownloading, and are super easy to install/uninstall and debloated.
2. Portable software doesn't need installation, activation, and uninstallation is easy to move, backup, and reset.
3. Movies/music are playable on all devices, no need for the internet, easy to to move and backup.
I want games, music, and software that comes on physical media that I have the rights to use forever.
well if they are dvds they sadly won't last forever
@@azurekite3870transfer to NVME
plastic doesnt last forever, i suggest purchasing a temperature controlled Vault, also make backup copies of the discs onto NAS Hard Drives and stash those in the vault as well.
@@azurekite3870in past i purchased DVDs and CDs for music and movies i saved them later on HDD.
I dabbled with piracy, well, purchasing a cheap CD-ROM from a seller, who got it from a pirate. I was overseas and didn't have access to any stores for purchasing said game. I came back home a few months later, and ordered myself a legitimate copy. I thought so highly of the game, I also ordered copies for my brothers and my father. That old CD-ROM still serves as a coaster on my computer desk... And the CD keys in the legit copies worked on Steam when I didn't have an optical drive on my new computers.
i tend to pirate games. the thing is, if i enjoy the game i always end up buying it. if i dont like it i dont even finish it.
there was a study about piracy in the movie, music and videogames insdustry. funny enough it was buried until someone enacted the freedom of information act. the fundings showed that piracy actually increases sales and only hurts the movies box office OPENING sales. you begin to wonder why the study was buried
Don't want people to pirate? Then *allow people to download it and save it on their computer*
Why would I prefer paying for a service that cuts off my ability to watch the stuff I love when copyright expired or when I'm offline if piracy gives me a capability to save what I love forever?
I still remember when Netflix sent DVDs out. I wonder how many people ripped them before sending them back.
WinRar is one of the best examples of a company understanding piracy.
This very well made video. thanks
Way back in the day I used to Pirate music from the Pirate bay(Which makes me a real pirate). I cant justify it, but I will say the 2-3 giant corps that controlled music never let us hear music from other countries like Germany, Netherlands and even England as well as other places. Only specific artists would be allowed to be heard or bought. Genres like psychedelic were rare to buy. Today it is easier to go to Discogs and just buy it.
yeah thats true, theres so many songs from Europe I never heard before
DRM has done more to promote piracy than the original Napster ever did.
I download a pirated copy of every game I buy. I don't want my games library to be tied to an online DRM service like Steam, Ubisoft Connect, Epic etc. Also something to remember about Valve is that they are the only company who have their own games store that don't also have games on other services, the only place you can buy any Valve game is on Steam. People say they don't want exclusivity to a storefront but have no problem with that when it is Valve and Steam.
If downloading UA-cam videos to my system and putting them on my phone is piracy, then guilty as charged.
My take is this: I buy an album in 1975 and the artist gets paid. In 1977, I buy the same album, on 8 track, and the artist gets paid... again, but hasn't done anything extra. Here come the 80's and I buy the same thing on cassette, the 90's cd, etc. I have paid the same artists 4 or 5 times for the same thing on different formats. Screw that. I don't pay any more.
It's almost as if a company's lust for greed & infinite profit shouldn't be taken out on its paying customers.
Teenager with a job now. My policy is if I can’t get it on blue ray then I don’t see any problem sailing the seas. I even buy the collectors edition version if available!
Unlike the music industry. The video/film industry will not consolidate, so all media is available for a fix monthly cost. There are too many players, which all want to serve exclusive content.
The legal work around is to only pay for one streaming service, and then switch every month.
But then it starts to become easier to pirate. Especially if you just need to see that one episode / movie.
In the uk when the bbc iPlayer first came out they had a system where you could download mp4 files of the content you wanted to watch and the files were copy protected you could copy the file to another device but couldn’t convert it to another format you had the mp4 of the content you want to watch and use it in any media player you used. You had the file for 7 days and when you started watching it you had 5 days to watch it and it would stop working as the license ran out but if you still had the mo4 files you could watch them again it the content came back on the iPlayer but they changed the system where you have to use there player to watch the content and done away with the mp4 downloads
Issue is also that a tv show you just started watching might disapear before you are done because of licence issues. now who ever holds the licence next will require you to sign up and give them money. If it was a service that had everything for like $50 that would be great or where it limited you to 10 movies, or 10 seasons of shows from non core services, for example like "netflix one" will have all of netflix + everything from other services but limited to a sertain quantity for each external service tie in. for steam you can get games from other publisher but it does the stupid thing that installs another launcher only to run it for 5 seconds before it launches the game. so something like that but without making you have a account of tie in services or force you to leave the enviroment and run a different app.
Short answer: YES. Copyright for the longest time was more or less an agreement between creators and consumers that "we will buy this but then we will own it and after14 years, we can copy it to our heart's content." That was the law and it was fine that way. But big money interests bought a LOT of laws in their favor. What do we have now? PERMANENT copyright because it's for a time after the death of the creator -- but most "creators" are immortal corporations. And thanks to the legality of cop protection, we will lose access even IF we manage to experience an expired copyright. And it gets worse still! The DMCA makes things insanely bad and abusive. "Fair use" is not a thing we can claim or use in defense when online services decide our content MIGHT be infringing in some way.
We now have complete breech of the copyright agreement entirely. And worse, we suffer abuse even with our legally "owned" materials. And all of these subscription services where you "buy" a thing... a movie, a song, a game? whatever, when the companies decide to no longer support a thing it DISAPPEARS completely with no recourse for the buyer.
Sadly we have to create and support legal pushback and we have to BOYCOTT the hell out of companies (which is currently all of them) who abuse the consumers. We have to become angry to restore our rights and to preserve the arts! As things are today, the ARTS ARE BEING DESTROYED. That's a huge loss to humanity.
Back in the day the price of software was 10x what it "should have been" and one theory was it was because the software producers assumed a program would be bought by one person and shared with another nine.
Gabe Newell said it best. Piracy is not about price, it's about convenience.
I myself am willing to pay $20+ for a blu-ray to rip it since that will be much higher quality than a pirated movie that's been compressed for storage space. Plus, my 1080p blu-ray rips look just as good as so-called 4k you get from a streaming service that's compressing it for the sake of bandwidth.
I absolutely agree with every bit of it.
looking forward to see more.