Prof. Ajmer Singh ji di eh gal baat baut vadiya ae , is veele di hakikat vi , ehda karan vi te ehda hal vi , jay akheya jaye ke is Lecture naal Ajmer Singh ji Sikha nu Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji dey nerre tay Sikh Koum nu ik karan di baut. Adiya te sohni koshash paye karde ne , bilkul sahi hovay ga. Kyonke kisay vi koum di taraki te agay vadna ik ho ke turan naal he mumkin hay . Dujay lafza ich keha eh geya ae ke bhayi ik dujay di gal sunan layi sabar te bardasht kolon kam lavvo te har gal utte larayi rembh ke beh jaan di aadat nu chaddo . Lajawab lecture , baut saukhe , sohne , saada , saaf , sahi te samajh aa jan walay tareke naal gal damag ich he nai balke dil ich paa ke baithan di vi puri koshash kiti ae .
Deconstruction of rational binaries (or certainties) 1) pacifism vs violence Eg. 1st 5 Gurus Vs last 5 Gurus Deconstruct to reveal that all of the Gurus had instructed Sikhs to resist social oppression. Guru Nanaks sayings against exploitation, caste prejudices, Bhai Lalos story, Guru Angad Dev on training, wrestling and physical fitness, Guru Arjan Dev keeping horses, community service, uneasiness between Sikhs and govt, political threat, Guru Hargobind - swords. By drawing straight lines we immediately imagine the first 5 Gurus to be pacifist and withdrawn from society, and the last five violent and less peaceful, when violence and peace can be present on both sides of the constructed/assumed divide 2) Religion v Secular Private v Public Deconstruction reveals that there is no public or private sphere. In Sikhism politics is a form of religion. We are religious in both word and deed, and what we practice has public consequences. By shutting Sikhism up in a box it is wrongly aligned with spiritual traditions that focus only on the self and ignore social responsibilities (ie hinduism). By the term 'religion' secularists are referring to private worship at a synagogue, church, temple, gurdwara, or mosque, and they wrongly assume them to be the same. 3) Speech Vs Writing Speech is privileged by Plato, Rousseau, Levi-Strauss, and Suassare over Writing because speech is taken to be more direct than writing. In India the introduction of the textual tradition by the West (eg Islam and Koran) was seen as violence against the oral tradition of hinduism. Deconstruction reveals that Writing is another form of speech, so writing can't be violence. In the Sikh tradition, their is no privileging of orality over textuality. The Sikhs believe that the Shabad (Word) is Guru, it can be spoken or read. 4) Nationalism (Pakistan v India) Hindu nationalism and Pakistani nationalism. They are not homogenous nations. And they are not merely Indian, Pakistani, Hindu or Muslim. India was part of Pakistan, and Pakistan part of India. 5) Sikhs v Hindus No religion emerges out of a vacuum, Islam and Hinduism were present in Punjab for centuries before Sikhi(sm) took birth. Deconstruction reveals that there are Sanatan-Brahmanized sects (Udasi, Nirmalla, Meenas etc) under the category 'Sikh' (lying in between), and that the uniform Sikh identity is a colonial construct. However the Khalsa form of Sikhism (mainstream) is the most authentic and has been for decades until it began to be polluted around late 18th century. To preserve mainstream Sikhism, it's purity and its unique 'identity' from Hinduism Sikhs must follow the teachings and practices of the 10 Gurus to arrive at (or get closer to) the Truth. Article 25 is controversial because Sikhs have been grouped with Hindus, Buddhists and Jains. This should be challenged as it doesn't tell us what the differences are. Emphasis is placed on Sameness and not Difference by the Indian nation.
Derrida's deconstruction can be liberating at times and sometimes a nuisance. He deconstructs oversimplified national identities and homogenized nation states, but continues with his method to locate heterogeneity in sub groups, preventing any kind of unified cohesive community to form. Consequently the community is depoliticized, and has no target - no political aim, no struggle for self determination. Edward Said was critical of Derrida for placing things out of context. Edward was a campaigner for Palestinian political independence and his work is indicative of this, whereas Derrida remained almost absent from politics. Derrida's greatest contribution however is on interpretation and translation of texts, and Edwards path breaking book Orientalism owes much to Foucault and Derrida. Orientalism has the tendency to universalize identities. There are people today who talk of the universality of Islam or Buddhism and Confucianism, when it is apparent that the people who practice these religions are divided on national lines. Vietnamese for example are not Chinese, centuries of conflict divided these people. The Vietnamese are proud of their distinct identity and cultural heritage, just as Japanese are proud of theirs. But Japan is not homogenous, and neither is China, though Buddhism or Daoism may have a universal appeal.
Gurbani is perfectly in tune with science and nature but Sikh youth was misguided by those who had adopted Communism as an political and social ideology ! They made flithy and cheap comments about Gurus and Gurbani ! Sikhs were and are not so educated and sharp brained to counter the comments of comrades !
Communism is a foreigner belief spread by and controlled urasia Brahmins. CONGRESS, BJP, CPI, CPM, TMC, AAP are directly and indirectly communists and fascists. Vote for BSP. Only then matter can be resolved amicably. Waheguru ji Ka khalsa waheguru ji Ke fateh. Jai bhim jai Bharat.
This video is from Kotkapura.. I loved in Kotkapura near study circle.. But I never got to know that bhai Ajmer singh ji came here.. Such an ignorant I am
The Guru Granth Sahib Ji is in Gurmukhi, not English or Hindi. The Sikhs have affection for their native language that only they can understand. They wear turbans not European hats, and have distinct values and customs. They prefer to live the life of saint warriors, and not ordinary people driven by personal interests and desires in modern societies. They don't relegate their heritage to the past (as is done by History), but keep it breathing by following the examples of their ancestors. Though the message of Sikhism is universal, the culture itself is relative.
Maharaj himself taught us in Chopai Saab, "aap apni budh hai jeti, barnat bhin bhin tohe teti". Then why to fight over different interpretations of Gurbani.
As long as Sikhism is linked to a belief system or a religion there will always be disharmony. To understand gurbani you have to approach it with a open mind there is no other way.
Yes Bhai Sahb, logocentric (absolute) meanings can not be found in the teachings of the Guru Granth Sahib. The meaning can not be deciphered by the intellect, a relationship between the unconscious (and conscious) and the GurBani must be established. The spirit must transcend to the level of super consciousness (towards the infinite) to 'understand' the Gurus sayings. Mere logic can not grasp the infinite, it can only conceptualise and give fixed meanings to things in the finite world (from where we get our categories). Christian metaphysics, western rationality and Hindu interpretations have failed to give correct translations. Sikh scholars too are doing PhDs on Guru Granth Sahib, but these translations are also poor.
That is why these intellects and their works can not bring any spiritual change in man. The reason is that the Guru Granth Sahib is an unstranslatable Granth of spiritual hymns meant for the soul.
The root cause in Sikhi is Apostasy; departing from the Truth. No more Guru, no more Truth. The scholars and PhDs will never understand Guru ki Bani. They are no more connected to Akal Purkh, as were the gurus. I dare to say that they cannot understand one word of Gurbani as it should be understood by the power of the Holy Ghost or the Spirit. Until and unless they humble themselves as little children, confessing they don’t know anything about heavenly things, they will never know the truth. ਸਭ ਸੁਖ਼ਨ ਕਉ ਹੁਕਮ ਹੈ ਗੁਰੂ ਮਾਨਿਉ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਵਾਲੀ ਗੱਲ ਹੀ ਸਮਝ ਨਹੀਂ ਆ ਰਹੀ,ਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਸ਼ਹਿਬਾਨ ਕੀ ਦਸ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ ।
Sade layi gurbani da giyaan guru hai granth nahi....shabad gurbani giyaan nu hi Nanak sahib ji ne guru kiha hai granth nahi...baki soch vichaar apna apna ho sakda.🙏
Sukhwinder Singh bhaji what is the whole point of ur linked video? It's all about explaining communism and capitalism. I think that's a completely different subject altogether
Singh sahab Guru ji mehar karange Sikh pant te na te Sikh phele kade vande gaye han na vande ja sakange je aise Guru Garant Sahib nu jeevan vich apnawange Koshish ta phle vhi batherya ne kiti sikhan nu vandan di hun vi kr rhe han likin je asi samjdhari naal ek hokr chalange ta jini koshish kr lan eh loki sanu vand nhi paunge
He himself is confused and making others more confused ! He cannot clarify and clear any point ! He has little knowledge and little knowledge is dangerous thing !!!
ਅਾਹ ਅਾਹਾ.......ਵਾਹ ਵਾਹ ਵਾਹ ....ਮੈਂ ਦੇਖ ਰਿਹਾਂ ਕਿ ਯੂਥ ਨੂੰ ਜਿਸ ਚੀਜ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ ਅੌਰ ਜਿਹੋ ਜਿਹੀਅਾ ਸਿਖਿਅਾ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ ........ਭਾੲੀ ਅਜ਼ਮੇਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੁਅਾਰਾ ਸੁਨਣ ਨੂੰ ਜਿਅਾਦਾ ਮਿਲ ਰਹੀਅਾਂ ਮੇਰੇ ਕੲੀ ਦੋਸਤਾਂ ਦੇ ਸ਼ੰਕੇ ਨਵਿਰਤ ਹੋੲੇ ਨੇ ਭਾੲੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਨ੍ੰ ਸੁਣ ਕੇ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਹੋਰ ਰਹਿਮਤ ਕਰਨ ............ਮੈਨੂੰ ਤਾ ਅਕਸਰ ਭਾੲੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਨ੍ੰ ਸੁਣ ਕੇ ਸਿਰਦਾਰ ਕਪੂਰ ਸਿੰਘ , ਭਾੲੀ ਕਾਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਨਾਭਾ , ਭਾੲੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਵੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਨੀ , ਪੋ੍ ਪੂਰਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ , ਅਾਦਿ ੨੦ ਵੀਂ ਸਦੀ ਦੇ ਵਿਦਵਾਨਾ ਦਾ ਚੇਤਾ ਅਾ ਜਾਂਦੈ ਤੇ ੲਿਓ ਲਗਦਾ ਜਿਵੇ ਭਾੲੀ ਅਜ਼ਮੇਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਵੀ ੨੧ ਵੀਂ ਸਦੀ ਦੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਕੌਮ ਵਿਚ ੳੁਪਰ ਦਿੱਤੀਅਾਂ ਹਸਤੀਅਾਂ ਵਰਗੇ ਵਿਦਵਾਨ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਨੇ .......ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਰਹਿਮਤ ਕਰਨ ......ਸਿੱਖ ਸਿਅਾੳਤ ਪੇਜ ਵਾਲਿਅਾ ਦਾ ਸਾਰੇ ਵੀਰਾਂ ਦਾ ਬਹੁਤ ਬਹੁਤ ਧੰਨਵਾਦ .........ਹਰ ਵਾਰ ਭਾੲੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੂੰ ਸੁਣ ਕੇ ਕੁਛ ਨਵੀ ੳੁਮੀਦ ੳੁਠਦੀ ਅੈ ਕੋੲੀ ਨਵੀ ਅਾਸ ਪੈਦਾ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਅੈ ....ਬਹੁਤ ਬਹੁਤ ਧੰਨਵਾਦ ....ਧੰਨ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ....
Prof. Ajmer Singh ji di eh gal baat baut vadiya ae , is veele di hakikat vi , ehda karan vi te ehda hal vi , jay akheya jaye ke is Lecture naal Ajmer Singh ji Sikha nu Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji dey nerre tay Sikh Koum nu ik karan di baut. Adiya te sohni koshash paye karde ne , bilkul sahi hovay ga. Kyonke kisay vi koum di taraki te agay vadna ik ho ke turan naal he mumkin hay .
Dujay lafza ich keha eh geya ae ke bhayi ik dujay di gal sunan layi sabar te bardasht kolon kam lavvo te har gal utte larayi rembh ke beh jaan di aadat nu chaddo .
Lajawab lecture , baut saukhe , sohne , saada , saaf , sahi te samajh aa jan walay tareke naal gal damag ich he nai balke dil ich paa ke baithan di vi puri koshash kiti ae .
ਸਰਦਾਰ ਅਜਮੇਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਦੇ ਅਜੋਕੇ ਹਾਲਾਤਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਦੇ ਕਲਾਕਾਰਾਂ ਨੇ ਗਾਏ ਗੀਤਾਂ ਜਾ ਗੱਲ ਨਾਲ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਦੀ ਜਵਾਨੀ ਸੁਣਦੇ ਸਮਝਦੇ ਜੀਵਨ ਨੂੰ ਬਦਲਦੇ ਜਾ ਕੋਸ਼ਿਸ਼ ਕਰਦੇ ਪਰ ਦੂਜੇ ਪਾਸੇ ਬੁਧੀਜੀਵੀਆਂ, ਸਿੱਖ ਪੰਥ ਦੇ ਜਥੇਦਾਰਾਂ ਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰਕਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਸਰ ਨੌਜਵਾਨ ਪੀੜ੍ਹੀ ਤੇ ਘੱਟ ਹੋ ਰਿਹਾ ਇਸ ਤੇ ਵੀਡੀਓ ਬਣਾ ਦਿਓ ਧੰਨਵਾਦ
Deconstruction of rational binaries (or certainties)
1) pacifism vs violence
Eg. 1st 5 Gurus Vs last 5 Gurus
Deconstruct to reveal that all of the Gurus had instructed Sikhs to resist social oppression. Guru Nanaks sayings against exploitation, caste prejudices, Bhai Lalos story, Guru Angad Dev on training, wrestling and physical fitness, Guru Arjan Dev keeping horses, community service, uneasiness between Sikhs and govt, political threat, Guru Hargobind - swords.
By drawing straight lines we immediately imagine the first 5 Gurus to be pacifist and withdrawn from society, and the last five violent and less peaceful, when violence and peace can be present on both sides of the constructed/assumed divide
2) Religion v Secular
Private v Public
Deconstruction reveals that there is no public or private sphere. In Sikhism politics is a form of religion. We are religious in both word and deed, and what we practice has public consequences. By shutting Sikhism up in a box it is wrongly aligned with spiritual traditions that focus only on the self and ignore social responsibilities (ie hinduism). By the term 'religion' secularists are referring to private worship at a synagogue, church, temple, gurdwara, or mosque, and they wrongly assume them to be the same.
3) Speech Vs Writing
Speech is privileged by Plato, Rousseau, Levi-Strauss, and Suassare over Writing because speech is taken to be more direct than writing. In India the introduction of the textual tradition by the West (eg Islam and Koran) was seen as violence against the oral tradition of hinduism. Deconstruction reveals that Writing is another form of speech, so writing can't be violence. In the Sikh tradition, their is no privileging of orality over textuality. The Sikhs believe that the Shabad (Word) is Guru, it can be spoken or read.
4) Nationalism (Pakistan v India)
Hindu nationalism and Pakistani nationalism. They are not homogenous nations. And they are not merely Indian, Pakistani, Hindu or Muslim. India was part of Pakistan, and Pakistan part of India.
5) Sikhs v Hindus
No religion emerges out of a vacuum, Islam and Hinduism were present in Punjab for centuries before Sikhi(sm) took birth.
Deconstruction reveals that there are Sanatan-Brahmanized sects (Udasi, Nirmalla, Meenas etc) under the category 'Sikh' (lying in between), and that the uniform Sikh identity is a colonial construct. However the Khalsa form of Sikhism (mainstream) is the most authentic and has been for decades until it began to be polluted around late 18th century. To preserve mainstream Sikhism, it's purity and its unique 'identity' from Hinduism Sikhs must follow the teachings and practices of the 10 Gurus to arrive at (or get closer to) the Truth. Article 25 is controversial because Sikhs have been grouped with Hindus, Buddhists and Jains. This should be challenged as it doesn't tell us what the differences are. Emphasis is placed on Sameness and not Difference by the Indian nation.
great
7th to 4
Eh bhai sahib de bolan ch bada dum hai khalsa ji
Absolutely right.Every one must understand what he is saying
Derrida's deconstruction can be liberating at times and sometimes a nuisance. He deconstructs oversimplified national identities and homogenized nation states, but continues with his method to locate heterogeneity in sub groups, preventing any kind of unified cohesive community to form. Consequently the community is depoliticized, and has no target - no political aim, no struggle for self determination. Edward Said was critical of Derrida for placing things out of context. Edward was a campaigner for Palestinian political independence and his work is indicative of this, whereas Derrida remained almost absent from politics. Derrida's greatest contribution however is on interpretation and translation of texts, and Edwards path breaking book Orientalism owes much to Foucault and Derrida.
Orientalism has the tendency to universalize identities. There are people today who talk of the universality of Islam or Buddhism and Confucianism, when it is apparent that the people who practice these religions are divided on national lines. Vietnamese for example are not Chinese, centuries of conflict divided these people. The Vietnamese are proud of their distinct identity and cultural heritage, just as Japanese are proud of theirs. But Japan is not homogenous, and neither is China, though Buddhism or Daoism may have a universal appeal.
Gurbani is perfectly in tune with science and nature but Sikh youth was misguided by those who had adopted Communism as an political and social ideology ! They made flithy and cheap comments about Gurus and Gurbani ! Sikhs were and are not so educated and sharp brained to counter the comments of comrades !
Communism is a foreigner belief spread by and controlled urasia Brahmins. CONGRESS, BJP, CPI, CPM, TMC, AAP are directly and indirectly communists and fascists. Vote for BSP. Only then matter can be resolved amicably. Waheguru ji Ka khalsa waheguru ji Ke fateh. Jai bhim jai Bharat.
waheguru g hor v bahi ssb g diya jiniya v video ne jldi uplod krna kro g eh v poori jaldi krna g dhanwad g ....
This is very true, thanks for uploading a such content
Knowledge creates ego and ego creates knowledge is the crux of Modern conflicts of Sikhs.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਦੀ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਨਾਲ ਸਿਖੀ ਸਿਖਿਆ ਗੁਰਵਿਚਾਰ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਲਾ ਸਿੱਖ ਸਵਾ ਲੱਖ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਇਕ ਅਧ ਹੀ ਮਿਲੇਗਾ ਜੀ ਭੋਲਿਓ ਸਿੱਖੋ ਸਮਝੋ ਸੋਚੋ ਵਿਚਾਰੋ।
Just finished watching Toofan Singh, now listening to lecture
Ajmer Singh also released a new book this year titled Kartar Singh Toofana da Shah asvaar. Must read when I find the time to
have u seen this, very interesting plz see
ua-cam.com/video/stNh_di8OM8/v-deo.html
This video is from Kotkapura.. I loved in Kotkapura near study circle.. But I never got to know that bhai Ajmer singh ji came here.. Such an ignorant I am
Sr. Saab -waheguru g ka khalsa
Waheguru g ki fateh
The Guru Granth Sahib Ji is in Gurmukhi, not English or Hindi. The Sikhs have affection for their native language that only they can understand. They wear turbans not European hats, and have distinct values and customs. They prefer to live the life of saint warriors, and not ordinary people driven by personal interests and desires in modern societies. They don't relegate their heritage to the past (as is done by History), but keep it breathing by following the examples of their ancestors. Though the message of Sikhism is universal, the culture itself is relative.
Maharaj himself taught us in Chopai Saab, "aap apni budh hai jeti, barnat bhin bhin tohe teti". Then why to fight over different interpretations of Gurbani.
Are you sure chopai is Guru Gobind Singh's bani ??
Waheguru
As long as Sikhism is linked to a belief system or a religion there will always be disharmony. To understand gurbani you have to approach it with a open mind there is no other way.
Waheguru g
Bilkul theek aa tohaadi gal
Guru granth sahib ji de arth samajhna vi zaroori hai ate guru granth sahib ji Di ebaadat karna vi zaroori hai
Yes Bhai Sahb, logocentric (absolute) meanings can not be found in the teachings of the Guru Granth Sahib. The meaning can not be deciphered by the intellect, a relationship between the unconscious (and conscious) and the GurBani must be established. The spirit must transcend to the level of super consciousness (towards the infinite) to 'understand' the Gurus sayings. Mere logic can not grasp the infinite, it can only conceptualise and give fixed meanings to things in the finite world (from where we get our categories). Christian metaphysics, western rationality and Hindu interpretations have failed to give correct translations. Sikh scholars too are doing PhDs on Guru Granth Sahib, but these translations are also poor.
That is why these intellects and their works can not bring any spiritual change in man. The reason is that the Guru Granth Sahib is an unstranslatable Granth of spiritual hymns meant for the soul.
Beautifully put.
Vaah! Guru sahib sanu avda Sikh bana laen
🙏
The root cause in Sikhi is Apostasy; departing from the Truth. No more Guru, no more Truth. The scholars and PhDs will never understand Guru ki Bani. They are no more connected to Akal Purkh, as were the gurus. I dare to say that they cannot understand one word of Gurbani as it should be understood by the power of the Holy Ghost or the Spirit. Until and unless they humble themselves as little children, confessing they don’t know anything about heavenly things, they will never know the truth.
ਸਭ ਸੁਖ਼ਨ ਕਉ ਹੁਕਮ ਹੈ ਗੁਰੂ ਮਾਨਿਉ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਵਾਲੀ ਗੱਲ ਹੀ ਸਮਝ ਨਹੀਂ ਆ ਰਹੀ,ਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਸ਼ਹਿਬਾਨ ਕੀ ਦਸ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ ।
Bhai ajmer Singh bahut hi vadhia Sikh ithas Kar Han badi sohni jankari dinde Han
paji eh dislikes wale nu ki galt laga plz dasna
Sade layi gurbani da giyaan guru hai granth nahi....shabad gurbani giyaan nu hi Nanak sahib ji ne guru kiha hai granth nahi...baki soch vichaar apna apna ho sakda.🙏
ਜੇ ਕਿਸੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਨੇ ਗੁਰਬਾਣੀ ਦੀ ਵਿਆਖਿਆ ਸੁਨਣੀ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਸਿਰਫ ਤੇ ਸਿਰਫ ਪਰੋ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਸਿੰਘ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਜਪੁਜੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸੁਖਮਨੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਆਸਾ ਦੀ ਵਾਰ ਭਗਤ ਕਬੀਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸਿਧ ਗੋਸਟਿ ਅਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਬਾਣੀਆਂ ਦੀ ਵਿਆਖਿਆ ਨੈਟ ਤੇ ਸਰਚ ਕਰਕੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੀ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਨਾਲ ਅਨੰਦ ਮਾਣੋ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੇ ਭੋਲਿਓ ਸਿੱਖੋ ਭਰਮਾਂ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਨਿਕਲ ਕੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਦਾ ਹੁਕਮ ਮੰਨ ਕੇ ਜੀਵਨ ਸਫਲਾ ਕਰੋ ਜੀ ਭਲਿਓ।
ਖੁਆਰ ਹੋਏ ਸੋ ਮਿਲੇਂਗੇ ਬਚੇ ਸ਼ਰਣ ਜੋ ਹੋਏ।
ਸੋਚਣ-िਵਚਾਰਨ ਵਾਲੀ ਗॅਲ...
ਇਸ ਅਮਲ ਤੋਂ ਅਲॅਗ ਹੋਣਾ...िਮਸਲਾਂ ਦੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਤੇ ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਪिਹਲੇ ਸਮੇਂ िਕਵੇਂ ਦੇ ਅਮਲਾ ਵਾਲੇ ਸੀ...(ਬੰਦਾ िਸੰਘ ਬਹਾਦਰ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਵਾਲੇ िਸੰਘ ਜੋ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਲ ਕੀਤੇ ਕੌਲ ਤੋਂ ਨਾ िਥੜਕੇ...ਅਾिਦ)
👍👍👍👍👍🙏
👍👍👍👍👍
Kaum de hire giani sant singh maskeen and sardar ajmer singh
Sikh ne guru granth sahib ji to ruhaniat leni hai
Vadya speech aa ji par ikk tabka aa jis bare tusi kuj nahi bol rahe jo ajj hr ikk gal te tark.kari janda
One tabke di gal hai g
That's who this lecture is all about. Listen carefully!
Sir ji Guru Granth Sahib davi nahi
ਜਿਹੜੇ ਬਿੱਜੂ ਸਿੱਖ ਇਹ ਸੋਚਦੇ ਨੇ ਕਿ ਅਸੀਂ P H D ਉਹ ਮਹਾਂ ਮੂਰਖ਼ ਨੇ
PhD hona galat Nahin. Sahi vichardhara samajhna zaruri hai. Waheguru ji Ka khalsa waheguru ji Ke fateh. Jai bhim jai Bharat.
Ajmer Singh ji aap ji Di gall bilkul theek hai par panth vich bohot vadde paar da kaaran akhauti dasam granth hai
Sir g eh ta agani lok da kam a una nu karn de ena tang alag hi ha
Guru Granth Sahib Ji is not proto-science to be superseded by modern science
ਨਿਸ਼ਬਦ
Kamtreda tenu ki pta ithaas bare tu apni sfai de bhai sandhu de mamle vich
Wah g great
Ikka baani ikk gur eko shabad vichar
Typical example is damdami taksal,SGPC
ਅੱਜ ਤਕ ਸੰਪਰਦਾਵਾ ਤਾ ਇਕੱ ਠੇ ਬੈਠਦੀਅਾ ਅਾੲੀਅਾ ਪਰ ਜੋ ਤਕਬਾ ਨਾਲ.ਨਹੀ ਰਲਦਾ ਿੲਸ ਬਾਰੇ ਸਭ ਜਾਣਦੇ ਹਨ ਪਰ ਅਫਸੋਸ ਅਾ ਿਕ ਤੁਸੀ ੳੁਹਨਾ ਬਾਰੇ ਗੱਲ ਨਹੀ ਕਰਦੇ
Manu Kaler ਸਰਦਾਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੇ ੳਨਾ ਬਾਰੇ ਹੀ ਗਲ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੇ
Very profound. Meri Ardas that we get his point. Thank you.
ਉਹਨਾ ਦੇ ਸ਼ਟਡੀ ਸਰਕਲ ਵਿਚ ਹੀ ਬੋਲ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ ਪਰ ਤੁਸੀ ਵੀ ਸਮਝੋ
लाल रंग मनुवाद का ।
नीला रंग भीमवाद का ।
जय भीम, नीला सलाम।
BSP lao. Tan he masla hal Hona.
ua-cam.com/video/VYsS2Om-gvg/v-deo.html
ੲਿਹ ਵੇਖੋ 'ਤੇ ਕੁਝ ਦਾੲਿਰੇ 'ਚੋਂ ਬਾਹਰ ਅਾਵੋ
Sukhwinder Singh bhaji what is the whole point of ur linked video? It's all about explaining communism and capitalism. I think that's a completely different subject altogether
Guru granth sahib di vichr bohat agy ha
ਬੋ
hun is leyi bi hindu jimmedaar..... vaahji
Tusi apne aap Kabul Kar lyea dhanvad tuhada
Ajj di date wich sikha da berha gark karn wale kaun ne eh ta tuhanu v pata ...
Shiya-suuny wali halat ho gi h
Navtej Singh ...ni veer apa eh gall ni hondenni
Panth lyy chardi kala di ardass karoo
Waheguru kirpa karn
Singh sahab Guru ji mehar karange Sikh pant te na te Sikh phele kade vande gaye han na vande ja sakange je aise Guru Garant Sahib nu jeevan vich apnawange
Koshish ta phle vhi batherya ne kiti sikhan nu vandan di hun vi kr rhe han likin je asi samjdhari naal ek hokr chalange ta jini koshish kr lan eh loki sanu vand nhi paunge
fr b veer ani buri halt ni hyi a hja b smjya ja skda kyunki seeya suni da level bht vdh chuka lodh a smjn di bki waheguru ji mehar krnga
He himself is confused and making others more confused ! He cannot clarify and clear any point ! He has little knowledge and little knowledge is dangerous thing !!!
Please clarify
Gurbani is very clear based on science / Reality/Truth/justice
He is confused
What is it? Please explain.
He is not confused , but crystal clear.Try to understand
Ikka baani ikk gur eko shabad vichar