Thanks again to Bright Cellars for sponsoring this video and for the limited time offer! Click here bit.ly/BrightCellarsLetMeExplain to get 50% off your first 6 bottle box!
Thank you for pointing out how manipulative Dumbledore's character really is. I was feeling so wretchedly wrong when I watch the whole Harry Potter series and read Philosopher's Stone. I was anxious for the sexual abuse that comes with Dumbledore's *grooming.* It was the only form of abuse that was not winked out by his creepy eyes. The rest of the child abuse and exploitation were ignored.
It would have made far more sense if the Qilin bowed in front of Jacob, not Dumbledore, since they'd previously made a big deal over Jacob being pure of heart.
That would have involved good writing though. Btw Is anyone else bothered by the fact that wizards are dressed exactly the same as muggles in these movies?!
But you’re missing the whole idea that the plot is about the beast that live within all of us not just the literal fantastic beasts. Besides it wouldn’t make sense for them to not address Grindelwald since during that time in the Wizarding world he would be on his rise to power and you can’t just have something as big as that happened and not have this be involved in some kind of way :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 I can see your view but to me that’s a cop out to the bait and switch going on. They could have an Indiana Jones wizard quest for beasts and Grindy could be the nazis but instead they are sacrificing the charm of the first movie in a clumsy attempt to get a new Voldemort antagonist Newt could be on his adventures and slowly learning of grindys lore as he meets new Wizards to build suspense but instead we get lowest common denominator stop bad guy films. Just my opinions but when I watch these films with family members who used to love Harry Potter I have to constantly answer their questions because nobody can really follow it anymore when the stories used to be simple like what is the chamber of secrets or where is the beast newt is looking for
And I get it's fantasy, but when you're in a specific time period and trying to make your books/movies about love and acceptance (which is funny considering), how do you completely leave out such a huge and devastating event? The excuse that it's for kids can't be used anymore, since most Potterheads are, at least, in their late 20s at this point and we've all learned about this stuff.
@@BooDotBoo what stuff, Dumbledore secret is set in 1932, this is one year before hitler becomes chancellor. This is before the Second World War, before the take over by the na zees
@@jimmymifsud1 yeah, but they also made the (horrible, offensive) decision of making Grindelwald predict WWII in the second movie. You would think that considering the amount of people that witnessed his precognition at the end of CoG, the wizard government would do something about it. Honestly the whole WWII thing is a mess that marks the franchise's downfall and shouldn't have been included
They made the same mistake with this movie as the did with The Hobbit. Rather than a fun stand alone film that expanded the world of Harry Potter a bit, they muggled it up by trying to write a prequel saga. I mean, did we really need an origin story for the snake? I can say with almost certainty that we're going to see a young Tom Riddle before the end of movie 5. Really, I think they should have focused on the in series books, and based it on those. Fantastic Beasts got its movie. Quiddich through the Ages would be a sports story that follows the Wigtown Wanderers, and the author/fan that follows them. Tales of Beedle the Bard would be an anthology of the 5 stories, directed by 5 different directors, with the framing device of James and Lily telling their infant son a bedtime story. Maybe they could have stretched out the stories into a few standalone films to really milk it.
@@c.l.1820 The film or the book? The book is great. It sits at 304 pages and is pretty much a short standalone story about a young Bilbo Baggins. The ring he steals from Gollum doesn't exhibit any corrupting qualities. All that was added later in LotR. The film could have easily been a 2 parter, but they focused so much on adding elements from LotR that it padded out the length to 3 films.
Other franchises have also made this mistake of looking too far ahead into the future, planning a 5-movie multiverse and forgetting to focus on the present. Look at what happened to The Mummy reboot.
I think Jude Law is a great actor in other movies, but I don't get all the praise for his Dumbledore. As long as he keeps wearing those dapper suits, I could never see him as Dumbledore. I just see him as Jude Law in a suit.
Maybe you should’ve tried re-watching it because I actually felt the same way towards Crimes of Grindelwald the first time I saw it and When I re-watched it not only do I understand it a lot more but I actually enjoy it almost more than the first fantastic beasts which is one of my favourite movies of all time :-)
I didn't need either of those channels to understand it it was very clear co me. Not that I didn't enjoy this recap especially the (Chillin) that is hilarious. And come on the purpose of pitch meetings is not to explain something it's to make fun of them that guy is a riot I did actually rewatch a video on movie flame on how crimes Of Grindelwald is not as bad as people say it is. The only hard part to fit in is McGonagall !
@@PaulZebraski McGonagle is not hard at all; I actually did research on this after Crimes of Grindelwald came out End it turns out that it’s all just fake and speculation/assumption when she was born it was never officially directly confirmed even on potter more. And therefore, that includes that she was actually older and was alive during this time period that she actually was because after all wizards live longer than Muggle Eh? :-)
The funniest part is how much they promoted the movie in Brazil, because of Vicenza Santos (who's also played by a Brazillian actress), and in the actual movie, she barely has any lines.
Well they do that all the time it’s not just this movie it’s just how it is of which there would be a lot of if our retarded species would just learn to let go of money for God sake
@@sexydirrtymoney Question: in All of those times watching the movie how did your opinions change if any at all? And related to the subject, what do you think about her role in the movie despite the fact that like you said she only has one line?
@@SuperMoviemaster21 Overall, the movie could have been written / edited better but I think it's time for the franchise to get new writers / director to make it FRESH. On Vicenza Santos...WB should not have promoted too much on a role with one line 👀 She and the other candidate, a Chinese wizard seems like a diversity token to me!
I thought Mads Mikkelsen did a good job portraying Grindelwald. He actually reminded me of how Colin Ferrell portrayed Graves / Grindelwald. I understand on principle Depp should've been in the Secrets Of Dumbledore but honestly.... I didn't miss his presence. The film wasn't what I expected but I thought it was better than Crimes Of Grindelwald
This movie was most apparent in how it doesn't match magical canon. 1. Portkeys: They didn't need to touch the portkeys (most noticeable with the spinning portkey, they just had to be near it). Would have made Voldemort's job pretty easy if you just had to toss a portkey NEAR Harry lol. Also when Jacob and Eulalie arrived in the train it definitely looked like floo powder. Coming from the fireplace, green flame and yet Jacob is saying how he hates Portkeys. 2. Apparation: apparently you no longer need to turn on your heels to apparate 3. Wordless magic: apparently everyone can do wordless magic now. Even though Voldemort, one of the strongest dark wizards of all time, has to use words to cast his spells apparently everyone else in this film has skills far superior to his own. 4. Dumbledore and Aberforth blocked the Avada Kedavra? Really? Again can't tell if that was the spell since wordless but it was green and Dumbledore said Grindewald was trying to kill. Anyways, apparently if two people trying to protect hits an oncoming Avada Kedavra with their spells it negates it? How does that make sense? Just a bunch of nonense in this movie
1) and 2) you are over thinking the port keysAnd apparation, Especially the latter since they definitely did not turn on their heels in the Harry Potter movies either…… As well, I also believe that It’s been described in the box about them doing it at certain times as well.And for the former they did touch them And we’re just not near them 3) Voldemort has done wordless magic before and don’t forget pretty much all of these guys are professional wizards Who and other characters like them have also done Wordless magic in the previous movies and in the Harry Potter books and movies as well. Don’t forget they are highly trained professional wizards after all :-) 4) in case you haven’t noticed, credence was indeed affected by that spell which was nonetheless at least partially deflected hence why he didn’t die right away and was in the process of dying. Perhaps it could be some unexplained magic that’s never slashrarely been experienced before. Just because it hasn’t happened before the series even with it being a prequel doesn’t mean that it can’t be explained And or is even wrong let alone the fact that you don’t understand it also doesn’t mean that it’s wrong either eH?
@@SuperMoviemaster21 totally with the portkeys could have missed them touching it but to me it lookes like they just walked up to it before our suitcase scene. The book portkey at the banquet was also ambiguous since they didn't get sucked away upon touching the book pages but upon them touching eachothers hands? (Unless she had the book in her hands that I missed). Anyways it could be that since they expect us to be more familiar with the portkeys from Book 4 they didn't make the emphasis of everyone having to gather around and clasp the portkey tightly like they did with the shoe taking them to the Wizard's cup. I guess in short, at least in the case of the the portkeys, it seemed more stylistic which made it more ambiguous and took me a bit out of it. with 4 I must have missed that because I thought it was his obscurus illness that made him so much weaker at the end (as in it was exponentially getting worse and worse even within that short period at the end) and not that part of the Killing Curse made it to him. If it was only partially deflected that makes much more sense, I thought from the one viewing I had that it completely negated it which would seem to take away a lot of lethalness and mystique surrounding it.
@@haleyolson1802 See, that is why you maybe need See this again in theatres for I actually felt Exactly the same way towards crimes of Grindelwald and when I went Inside again not only did I get it more but I actually thoroughly enjoyed it so much that I consider to be one of the best Wizarding world movies and almost better than the first fantastic beasts which is one of my top favourite movies of all time :-) so see you never really know about these things until after you truly think about and analyze but not over analyze them and that sometimes involves having to see them again :-)
As someone who grew up reading the Harry Potter books AS they released I am laughing so hard at the idea of Albus The Ends Justify The Means Dumbledore being called “pure of heart”
I actually saw Mads and Jude more compatible than the pale white Johnny Depp (I love Depp btw) I liked it more than the second but that duel between Credance and Jude made no sense...did they go in another reality to avoid destroying the muggle world?
Yes! Borrowed mirror dimension from Dr. Strange! Lessens the stakes, IMO, and makes the fight less gripping =\ Member in Fantastic Beasts I when they literally blew out the side of a building + ripped up roads? Humph~
To be fair, I doubt that Johnny Depp was responsible for the hair and makeup used for Grindelwald. Well, the heterochromia was his idea; he's said that in interviews. The white hair and pallor seems to have been out of his wheelhouse.
From what I can gather. Dumbledore noticed Credence and basically put a glamour on him. Credence lost before the fight even started. Credence was fine in the first movie but they shouldn't have kept bringing him back.
@@waterywingz I think any Wizarding fights lessens the stakes when it comes to revealing the Wizarding World. Death will be there but seeing the destruction and constructing fear already lessen the stakes with MIB-esque memory wipes and government-esque cover ups with the means of magic. Pretty much it's the Wizarding World and Muggles just lived in it. When I think about it kinda lessens Grindlewald's and Voldemort's motivation to destroy them. Then again Muggles were destroying each other and bleeding the destruction to the Wizarding World.
Honestly, this series could have been amazing if they did it right... Lean into the fantastic beasts idea, have Newt and the gang established in the first movie come together to stop a group of Magical Poachers or a group that is searching for an ancient beast that would grant them unrivaled power. Even though the movies involve the animals in some capacity, they feel very sidelined when that the entire premise of the original and that's Newt's main thing... I feel like they tried too hard when they started connecting this directly to HP characters like Dumbledore. I remember when they name dropped Dumbledore and the fact that Newt was expelled from Hogwarts, it felt so cool. This is a new character for us, one who's come from a place we know, but is doing his own thing. It felt fresh, but they really dropped the ball. Maybe if the culmination of the series was going after Grindlewald, using beasts from all the movies and everyone coming together, it would have worked. But turning this into
This movie was okay. Better than Crimes of Grindelwald but still had some issues with story and plot concerns. Especially concerning contradictions with what has been set up before. It was a good movie in terms of trying to fix the mistakes of the second film and Madds was great as Grindelwald but the fantastic beast aspect of it is getting lost.
@@Ash-uf4fv Fair enough. I did only see it once so maybe I was so bored that day that this movie didn’t faze me as much. Though I don’t think I’ll watch it again. Second movie I saw it twice and still found issues with it, but in its defense it did have more fantastic beasts than this one did. Or maybe it just feels that way.
Well if you actually stopped and thought about this movie and give it a chance maybe even see the second time then maybe just maybe you might actually understand it more. I’m sure you probably Encountered that with many other movies that you’ve seen right?
@@TheRibottoStudios Yes but I’m just saying/merely asking you to consider what I’m saying here and apply it for you may very well be making a mistake if only to you :-)
The stake in the heart for this movie was Jacob being accused of being an assassin. How? How does anyone in this world imagine that a Muggle could use a wand, could attack Grindelwald with a storm, is any kind of threat to anyone?
I only really care about Jacob's Story and that preaty much ended in this movie, if they are going to continue the story I hope they leave him and Queeny out of it.
Well if you want to be able to give them the opportunity for that, then need to worry about more is people refusing to go and see #FantasticBeastsTheSecretsOfDumbledore all because of her comments; I’d highly encourage and recommend everyone [please Encourage as many other people as you can as well please :-) See it as many times as they can in theaters, and even If possible,buy a ticket for it In place of going to see another movie so that way it still gets money without you actually having to see it multiple times. Buying as many merchandise directly related to it as possible will also truly help. Also remember that if you’re refusing to see it because of #JohnnyDeppIsMyGrindelwald Then please remember that this movie needs to do well so as to give Johnny the chance to actually come back in the Later movies, For the actor who played MacNair The executioner was re-casted for prisoner of Azkaban and then came back for order of the Phoenix. The bottom line is that if #FantasticBeastsTheSecretsOfDumbledore Doesn’t do well, And they don’t make the remaining two movies,then Johnny definitely will never be back as Grindelwald!Plus you also have to remember that it’s about to be a new company with new people over seeing it, So as such you were technically not paying that company and are actually giving more of a chance than not having him actually return. Especially depending on what may happen with the results of his trial that’s going to be happening shortly after the movie comes out, the new people taking over Warner Bros. right before it comes out…… Also remember in regards to her that she doesn’t necessarily get a whole lot of money from this, as well the fact remains that as many people have pointed out that she already has so much money that not supporting the series will not really change any kind of “power“ that you may have against her, and after all the series should not suffer at all because of her for Regardless of what you may think, nothing I repeat nothing will ever ever truly take away what a series overall truly means to you let alone other people, And again it’s not The series that’s the problem at all in any kind of way :-) Also keep in mind that even though it’s not the best example they have at least one transgender person or someone who identifies themselves as “They” in the cast so much for her transphobia……
@@toyang.. Weak excuse. The real reason is Rowling messed up her timeline ONCE AGAIN and the fans pointed out to her that it's impossible for Credence to be a brother because Albus' parents were already dead. They couldn't conceive someone as young as Credence. So Rowling did a retcon ONCE AGAIN and made him a nephew.
7:57 “but he’s there giving birth to a new fantastic beast” caught me off guard. A very interesting choice for the story, but it got the audience invested for sure lol.
13:50 That's what I've always thought! Dumbledore *says* he's sworn off personal power, yet as headmaster of Britain's magical school he has a hella lot of power. He was also head of the Wizengamot in book canon, and even yes, Supreme Mugwump! So the only position of power that Albus has consistently refused to take is head of the Ministry of Magic, which as portrayed in the books isn't all that powerful. Curious, isn't it?
They promised us Fantastic beats and seeing the other wizard schools and instead we get a convoluted mess. Grindelwald should have been a two part movie and then the series could have moved on.
But if the series [Hopefully] continues then we may very well see the other Wizarding schools. It may be hard to follow but once you fully get it and understand it from Rewatching it/seeing it again then you’ll truly realize how interconnected it truly is; trust me I felt the exact same way towards crimes of Grindelwald when I first saw it but then when I re-watched it and I only understood it but I thoroughly enjoyed it I consider to be one of the best Wizarding World movies now :-) It does make sense for Grindelwald to be involved since he would’ve been rising to power the time and it would’ve made sense for him not be included since he’s a major player in the Wizarding world and it also helps relieve the series to the fantastic beasts that live within all of us because that’s what we all essentially are and who better to emphasize the fantastic beasts of humanity then someone like Grindelwald who would’ve been on the rise to power within this timeframe? :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 Eh I’ve already watched again and liked it less because the cool thing about voldy as a villain is you don’t see him in the beginning stories but instead see his affect on people. When he finally rises to power again it’s earned and then he’s in power for a bit causing terror. Grindy on the other hand is becoming like dr eggman where it’s almost Funny every time he gets foiled and there isn’t a suspense to his presence. He’s just bad because the movie tells you and there isn’t a tension to his growing ambition. I think there is a way to incorporate him but by less is more allowing newt and his beasts to have good standalone adventures without constantly forcing them together with grindy. The first movie works because it’s primarily a wizarding world building in America fish out of water story with grindy as a threat later. It could have been even more compelling if newt and grindy were friends or something but they aren’t earning him as antagonist in my opinion and it’s like desperate sequel franchise bait The Harry Potter books worked well because they are stand alone mystery novels that eventually became a wizard war saga later
12:16 Tina's not in this one because Katherine Waterston angered J.K. Rowling by openly calling for support for trans rights. Since JKR is a middle-aged woman who never outgrew the Mean Girl stage, she punished Waterston by essentially writing her out of the movie.
"Mutual respect for one another's abilities." That is just as bad when they (Cartoon Network in 1999-2000) said that Sailor Neptune and Sailor Uranus were "cousins" in Sailor Moon S (season 3 of the original anime series.)🙄😏
I will say that this series suffers so much from there not being a book. The Harry Potter movies had books that the viewer could read beforehand and fill in the gaps. A lot of things in the Phantastic Beasts movies do not really make sense in the already established universe but could in theory be established. But they aren't. My friends biggest gripe with this movie was that such a huge event like in the third movie had to have been mentioned somewhere in the original books. Also everyone (really everyone) being able to do wandless magic, the confusing floo powder/portkey thing, the election taking place in not Germany(?), Tina being slowly written out of the story, and so much more. Like, I could come up with some reasons for those plot ambiguities but those things should have had a book. That would at least lead to a much more streamlined story that could flow so much better.
Let's be honest, at this point, J.K. is just throwing whatever out there because Harry Potter fans will still eat it up. This series has no direction, at all. It's just going here and there. Which, I get is good because they can take it anywhere and include whatever they'd like, but also not good because it can go anywhere and the movies don't even really connect because there's no source material, no direction for it. If there is, it doesn't seem that clear to anyone watching, and it went off the rails with the second movie. I never even saw that one because of what I was hearing about it. This just seems to complicate it even more. Why couldn't we stick with him going around and studying and discovering creatures? That was fun and I was actually looking forward to seeing all the animals we'd heard mentioned in the books and in the Fantastic Beasts book.
The voiceless spells bothered me, because like you said, it is a difficult thing to do and now every one is doing it constantly???!! I love hearing the different spells! The scenes were cool, but could have been so much cooler.
maybe i’m the only one who loves secrets of dumbledore, the effects, fight scene with credence and albus, the chemistry between jude and mads is amazing
I actually love it to be considered to be on the top Six best of the Wizarding World movies overall! :-) I’m actually excited to see the second time in theatres :-)
something i appreciated about the last one is that for the tiny albus and gellert flashbacks they brought back the same actors that played them in the last harry potters flashbacks as well, like it had been years but I remembered it was them and I appreciated the continuity. i haven't seen this one yet, and I know they don't care about making sense with the worldbuilding so lets not think about that, but I wish the movies had the guts to not shy away from the relationship and actually show it, like show affection and actual scenes, not just cutable lines, but oh well. and I love that that "the secrets" are all things you know if you've read the books or know any basic thing lmao, I've seen short fan films online that did a better job of showing the story and expanding on facts we knew than just you know telling
Trust me there are a lot more secrets that they reveal in this movie that were not previously known from reading the box. And of course know that it’s not just about Albus but the whole Dumbledore family as a whole, including related to what Dumbledore does in the movie, the secrets to who he truly is. And for your FYI, there’s actually a lot more and even Better continuity to the movies then what was in the previous ones Including the previous David Yates Harry Potter movies that he really really should’ve done all along…… :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 i'm talking more about tha fact that jk rowling will invent whatever the heck she wants as she goes along even if it makes no sense with what she previously established, and then claim that it was always the plan or makes sense. like saying albus is pure of heart when he has shown multiple times that he isn't. but I haven't seen the movie so I can't say anything specific about it, I was just going off the video, and the things mentioned were things we all know from before or things invented for the new movies, which I cant speak on
@@neivilde.1242 well then you truly need to go out and see the new movies that way you actually know what we’re talking about Ian or see if you can actually make sense of it yourself which you may be able to more than this guy here and even me who is truly defending it can. And again if you really think about it Albus always is pure of heart having learned from his mistakes and doing things like neglecting the level of power further proves that he is because he knows that he will not be pure if he has that kind of power and even with Harry despite the claims of “raising him like a pig for Slaughter” he always knew that Hilary would be able to come back after Voldemort killed him because of the use of Lily’s blood when he got resurrected; Again if you truly experienced it and truly think about it then you’ll not only get it but may actually thoroughly enjoy it and be able to see that it’s not as bad as you were others may think or even how it originally May seem :-)
@@neivilde.1242 But if you wait for that, but only with a movie possibly not make enough money for them to make the remaining movies, but you may not appreciate it as much since it’s meant to be seen on the big screen and you may very well be more engaged and into it. Trust me it’s well worth seeing as soon as you can especially since you say you are a big Harry Potter fan and what I said especially if you like it all the nostalgia callbacks, then you’re definitely gonna love and appreciate this one :-)
I liked the first film cause Newt was the main character and it was mostly about you know, *The Beasts*. The others are just trash. Newt was fun and the beasts were cute and interesting
I think a big problem of the series is every movie is about taking down Grindelwald instead of having newt and the gang go on these light hearted adventures and use the Grindelwald as the overshadowing plot until the very end idk just a thought
What's interesting about alot of reviews on the Secrets of Dumbledore is how some reviewers (not all), question a studios motive when they bring up politics which is interesting because the XMen animated cartoons in the early 90's centered around discrimination, politics, and the ways that both humans and mutants handled their individual experiences. The XMen series ran for about 10+ years with no complaints nor push back. I say all of that to say that the level of complexity of story writing, juggling each characters own ambitions, the human element, and the eventually war that is coming leaves me a little amazed that teenagers are able to get this story. The movies usually don't do the books justice so now I am curious to read thr prequel to the Harry Potter novels.
It didn’t run that long, but it returning this year or next. There are two shows after it, that had similar themes, but one reimagined everything into a public high school thing, and a Wolverine lead show, that’s just him trying to prep for the dystopian future of sentinels.
XMen was always an allegory to the civil rights movement tho, in the same way movies like Hunger Games or Civil War are bound to end up political. Harry Potter went from a moody and hilarious kid learning he’s a wizard, a trust fund baby and the Chosen One all while dealing with very concerning issues like a particular homework he’s in no way shape or form capable of doing without copying from his friend…. to whatever Fantastic Beasts is. That’s why is heavily criticized, cause any political element is shoehorned in for fake wokeness.
@@biazacha Harry Potter has always been about the politics of muggle and wizard relations, dark and light magic, pure blood vs. muggle born.! ESPECIALLY in the second half of the series.!
I will never understand how WB missed giving Yusuf a proper twist. In fact, I would never understand why that character existed in the first place since it didn’t move the original plan forward in any significant way. Mind boggling stuff.
You’re making a big mistake by not checking the movie out for even if Come to a conclusion from watching this and or other reviews then upon experiencing yourself you may very well notice or realize things that these people are overlooking which I can definitely tell you that they certainly are without thinking critically about it [and perhaps having too much wine]
@@emidal05 Seriously, you are going to regret it especially in the sense that you’re not helping a lot of people who actually like these movies and we’re just gonna end up being mad at you but you may very well regret and not be glad you did especially since you have the wrong attitude and mindset towards it. I seen it you could’ve very well seen things that this idiot and other reviewers overlooked and not just from drinking wine, for hearing about things is very different from actually experiencing them yourself, for we are all different and therefore see and experience things and get out of them From every single person to the next, hence why I am defending it here and he doesn’t like it or rather doesn’t get it because he went in with the wrong mine said without actually fully examine it in the right way again being too influenced by other things
@@SuperMoviemaster21 Nothing is stopping you from watching this movie as many times as you want in the theater. If this is the best Warner Bros can do for a HP movie then it deserves to fail.
It would have been way better to make fantastic beasts a Indiana Jones type movie series and then seperatly a movie series about Dumbledore&politics in the wizarding world
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I personally enjoyed this movie so much, it might actually be my favourite of the three FB movies so far! I loved the idea of the countersight plans, and how it weaved in and out of the main plot, and how Dumbledore's secret were met up with along the way. And the ending was so sweet and gave some nice finality, in a hopeful way.
Look they've could have made it simple: Have Grindelwald want X amount of extremly rare beasts for some extreme form of magical spell that would allow him to, let's say, destroy all the boundaries between the wizard world and the muggle world in an instance (like all the spells that keep muggles from not noticing the magical places, Like DIagon alley, the Blacks family home etc etc etc.......) They could even have had them all in the dark about why he was looking for them. Credence would be the first, an obscuris, and then move on to others. That would have atleast had it make sence as to why Newt was so involved in this: Dumbledore knew he was the greatest zoologist in the world, because he trained him. But nooooo. They made one good film, then they lost track and now only want to do "Young Dumbledore" instead.
I think the core problem of these movies is that JK Rowling is not a good screenplay writer. I mean everything's there, but it just doesnt gel into an actual good movie. BTW I actually really like Mads as Grindewald.
Fr I dont know what the writers and director were thinking with this installment, it was super messy. Maybe 6 movies wouldn’t have been a bad idea because there’s SO much to unpack. OR IF THIS WAS A SERIES SMH.
Watched the movie. So, Jacob was given a coreless wand by Dumbledore. That wand was most likely gotten at Olivander's. I'm to believe that Olivander made a wand from some tree and didn't give it a core? Olivander makes fake wands?
I actually love this movie, if not just for the first scene with Jude and Mads just doing superb acting together. I was so sad for them that Dumbledore and Grindlewald can't reconcile because Grindle has no remorse
If you truly watch it and truly engage and think about it even if you may have to multiple times, once you truly get it not only will you understand it but you also enjoy it even if you’re not a major Harry Potter fan. Trust me I felt the same way towards Crimes of Grindelwald but then when I re-watched it again what I’m stating above actually happened, And With other movies as well which I’m sure you and others have probably experienced as well EH?
The Depp fans claiming that his absence hurt this movie are just simping in the drama surrounding his court case. Both Colin Ferrel and Mads Mikelson blew him out of the water and are much more convincing than a disheveled albino. Depps box office pull is negligible considering the first movie did fine the second was awful and the third, though an improvement, won’t make the kind of money to support a franchise.
The thing is they were supposed to be confusing Grindlewald but ended up confusing the audience. Everything looked amazing but I was still scratching my head thinking BUT WHY????
Just watched it today, and while it has problems (Theseus's rescue from prison went on way too long, for example), I overall liked it better than the last one. Would a film series focused on Dumbledore as title character instead of Newt and his beasts have made more sense for this installment? Yes. Is it the series focusing solely on Newt and the beasts that people wanted? No, but we're 3 movies in so I just say "fuck it" and embrace the madness. While it's still rather convoluted, it has a stronger anchor than in Crimes of Grindenwald with the election and the Qilin. It also goes out of its way to answer some of the nonsense of the previous movie or trim out the unnecessary parts of it; I completely forgot Nagini was even a thing, that's how little she contributed to the story. I'm glad she was cut off, there were enough characters to deal with. Although, I would've liked to have known more about the other election candidates, Tao and Santos, find out why Santos is so pure of heart as to be elected. I mainly rooted for her cause she's a woman and Latina, that's good enough for little old Latina me. What I actually really liked was how they handled Dumbledore and Grindenwald's relationship. JK TERFling's initial backstory for them was that Dumbledore was manipulated by and had an unrequited love for Grindenwald, which I didn't like cause it was a missed opportunity to make Grindenwald a completely different villain from Voldemort, instead both being evil power hungry muggle haters who want to take over the world because evil and power. I wanted their relationship to be more like Profesor X and Magneto from X- Man: 2 men who love each other dearly, but are separated by opposing beliefs. Magneto is a Villain, but he's a Villain with a good point, and he genuinely wants the best for his kind. That's where I wanted Dumbledore and Grindenwald to go, and to a certain extent they did. I particularly hone in on their fight in the end, after the blood oath breaks. They have spent 2 whole movies sending other people to defeat them because the oath prevents them from attacking each other. Yet when the oath breaks, there's nothing holding them back and they have the other by the proverbial throat... they still can't finish each other off. Why? I like how after they return to reality, Grindewald asks Dumbledore, "Who's gonna love you now?" And how, just before he escapes, he says "I was never your enemy. Then and now." Maybe it's just me, but I read a slew of implications behind those lines. That Grindenwald returned that love (not a healthy love, mind you, but love nonetheless), his heartbreak at Dumbledore's perceived betrayal and even that, despite everything, he still cares for Albus in some way. Very Cherik. And as much as I love Johnny Deep and celebrate his triumph, Mads Mikkelsen comes much nearer to my ideal for Grindewald than Johnny. He and Jude Law also have great chemistry together, something I'm not sure could've been achieved to the same level with Johnny. I also liked Lally, also I spent the entire movie trying to pinpoint that accent. Overall, it's a far stronger movie than Crimes of Grindewald. I in no way attribute this to JK TERFling, but to Steve Kloves, who very obviously script doctored the shit out of whatever her 1st draft was. Thank God he came back.
Oh trust me you’re only hurting yourself by doing that. Why ask me see it for yourself you’ll actually quite likely be able to point out and noticed things other people didn’t for better or for worse. Have you even tried re-watching crimes of Grindelwald? Because I actually felt pretty much the same way when I saw it but then when I re-watched it not only do I actually get it but I actually really like it now I consider to be among the best of the Wizarding world movies :-)
Still love this movie, idk why, i just wanted to go braindead and have a good time watching this movie, 10/10, love the movie, and i believe Dumbledore's wand shares a core with The Elder Wand, PRIORI INCANTATEM!
@@DadsCigaretteRun same. I was really looking forward to it but it was sooo boring. Majority of it was walking and standing and talking. I either needed more animals, more fights, etc.
@@DadsCigaretteRun Have you tried reconsidering and reevaluating the problems that you have with it? Maybe try to see a second time? Believe me I Felt similar towards crimes of Grindelwald But when I re-watched it not only did I fully truly get it but I also was enthrallingly entertained by it so much that I consider to be one of the best Wizarding World movies and maybe you may very well Feel the same towards this one :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 I might re-watch it but I probably won’t go out of my way. There was some decent scenes especially when Dumbledore was talking about his sister which I found fascinating but that was about it. Genuinely hated this movie, the worst Harry Potter movie I’ve ever seen hands-down
I still think the first Fantastic beasts trumps its sequels but Secrets Of Dumbledore although its story-telling was weird, was full of subtle and unique lore drops that set up the events we know today, it confirmed Ariana was an Obscurial which we've been speculating for years! There is so much more, although the manner in which all these lore drops are dropped, either way, Info is Info, and i need more info.
I haven't yet seen the movie but from what I saw but I never bought Dumbledore and grendels being lovers They don't seem to have that type of chemistry
I like the fact that you believe Dumbledore was speaking metaphorically when he said "Because I was in love with you." Dumbledore has always spoken in metaphors and riddles as we knew him in the original movies. He is not much different here.
I watched the first, fell asleep in the second and didn't bother with the third. This video while excellent still did not clear the plot up for me at all.
Seriously, you are going to regret it especially in the sense that you’re not helping a lot of people who actually like these movies and we’re just gonna end up being mad at you but you may very well regret and not be glad you did especially since you have the wrong attitude and mindset towards it. I seen it you could’ve very well seen things that this idiot and other reviewers overlooked and not just from drinking wine, for hearing about things is very different from actually experiencing them yourself, for we are all different and therefore see and experience things and get out of them From every single person to the next, hence why I am defending it here and he doesn’t like it or rather doesn’t get it because he went in with the wrong mine said without actually fully examine it in the right way again being too influenced by other things
Did no one else notice Dumbledore removing the Obscurus from Credence?!?! Idc Credence is Ariana?!? I seriously think that Albus with the help of Grindelwald found a way to remove the obscurus from Ariana which would explain why he was willing to take her with them to travel the world before Aberforth found out. The biggest clue to this is in the new movie when Albus and credence are fighting he uses a spell that literally removes it from him!! credence looks like he’s dying in the scene and Fawkes flies over him burning then Dumbledore then puts it back in him!!
10:05 "That bottle would be called 'tomorrow'." So true. Cracked me up! 🤣🤣😁😁 I guess the backstage team studied the history of this and probably figured out that this style of stopper was very popular during that era. I doubt they expect many people to notice. But that was a great joke, LME. :D
these movies VISUALLY are so damn good TT I wish it was more about the fantastic beasts and less about dumbledore and his issues. Its such a mess... did they just not plan the series before starting or smthing???
J.K. and her Fantastical Views have kind of killed Harry Potter for me, so I have very little interest in the movies in this series. The first one was pretty good because it was nice to see the various creatures, which I thought was the whole point of this series, but now it's going way somewhere else, almost like a weird fantasy soap opera, so I'm kind of happy I lost interest. And there are more of these movies planned? I'll leave it to the Potterheads who still enjoy it. I'm just watching this review because I like the way you explain things... and I'm curious and don't plan to go see this movie, anyway, so yeah.
I just wanted to end on Credence and his dad sharing a meal over his moms portrait, I thought that was gonna be the whole fulfilling last scene... big upset
I hope you're not referring to the portrait of Ariana in the Hog's Head, or else Aberforth is no better than the Gaunts. In fact he'd be even worse lmao.
@@jorgenbaert924 I mean more "this is your mom, you wouldve loved her" kinda convo... not "you have power! unlock and be unashamed of it so i can use it to my will!"
One of my friends- this movie was so good it was so funny cause of the one crab dancing scene?? 😂 All these actors are way to good for this movie 😅 To Make Magic Great Again I’m dying 😂😂 Jk loses the plot = accurate description
Thanks again to Bright Cellars for sponsoring this video and for the limited time offer! Click here bit.ly/BrightCellarsLetMeExplain to get 50% off your first 6 bottle box!
🙄
Thank you for pointing out how manipulative Dumbledore's character really is. I was feeling so wretchedly wrong when I watch the whole Harry Potter series and read Philosopher's Stone. I was anxious for the sexual abuse that comes with Dumbledore's *grooming.* It was the only form of abuse that was not winked out by his creepy eyes. The rest of the child abuse and exploitation were ignored.
It would have made far more sense if the Qilin bowed in front of Jacob, not Dumbledore, since they'd previously made a big deal over Jacob being pure of heart.
If not Jacob at least Newt should be the one
That would have involved good writing though.
Btw Is anyone else bothered by the fact that wizards are dressed exactly the same as muggles in these movies?!
It was meant for Jacob and I got mad they did that to us with Dumbledore
@@tripp9278 Yes for which J.K had 3 movies worth of time to write and develop characters
But remember, they cannot have it bow to a Muggle EH?
The Fantastic beasts series should have been about saving animals not fixing dumbledores relationship trauma
Mutual appreciation
Yeah and like visiting the other wizard schools, not just revisiting Hogwarts
But you’re missing the whole idea that the plot is about the beast that live within all of us not just the literal fantastic beasts. Besides it wouldn’t make sense for them to not address Grindelwald since during that time in the Wizarding world he would be on his rise to power and you can’t just have something as big as that happened and not have this be involved in some kind of way :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 I can see your view but to me that’s a cop out to the bait and switch going on. They could have an Indiana Jones wizard quest for beasts and Grindy could be the nazis but instead they are sacrificing the charm of the first movie in a clumsy attempt to get a new Voldemort antagonist
Newt could be on his adventures and slowly learning of grindys lore as he meets new Wizards to build suspense but instead we get lowest common denominator stop bad guy films.
Just my opinions but when I watch these films with family members who used to love Harry Potter I have to constantly answer their questions because nobody can really follow it anymore when the stories used to be simple like what is the chamber of secrets or where is the beast newt is looking for
What was Dumblebores secret I left learning nothing new!
"I didnt expect to see so many people transitioning on J.K's turf."......I see what you did there.....🤣
Seriously made me laugh! Snuck in a trans joke and called JK a TERF. Well done!
That was extremely clever lol
I was playing this in the background and had to switch back to the UA-cam window to replay that part lmao
This knocked me out! Damn that was some good shade!
Got a good eyebrow raise and chuckle from me!
How the fuck is dumbledore the purest of heart? He lies and manipulates. In his youth he experimented with the dark arts . Yeah pure of heart
Yeah, but people like him ...
I mean, hell, if Alan Rickman was still alive, I'd expect the lizard-deer to bow before Snape ... somehow.
I would make a lot of sense if he would bow Infront of Newt
Rowling contradicting her own canon and characterization is nothing new.
They also have a German ministry of magic, “did they just not see what was going on”.
Enjoying the amount of word play in this video
And I get it's fantasy, but when you're in a specific time period and trying to make your books/movies about love and acceptance (which is funny considering), how do you completely leave out such a huge and devastating event? The excuse that it's for kids can't be used anymore, since most Potterheads are, at least, in their late 20s at this point and we've all learned about this stuff.
@@BooDotBoo what stuff,
Dumbledore secret is set in 1932, this is one year before hitler becomes chancellor.
This is before the Second World War, before the take over by the na zees
@@jimmymifsud1 yeah, but they also made the (horrible, offensive) decision of making Grindelwald predict WWII in the second movie. You would think that considering the amount of people that witnessed his precognition at the end of CoG, the wizard government would do something about it. Honestly the whole WWII thing is a mess that marks the franchise's downfall and shouldn't have been included
That would only word in the American accent where "not" is pronounced more like "nat".
"He's meeting with an orphan named Credence whose guardians don't believe in reading Harry Potter books." - OMG you're right!
They made the same mistake with this movie as the did with The Hobbit. Rather than a fun stand alone film that expanded the world of Harry Potter a bit, they muggled it up by trying to write a prequel saga. I mean, did we really need an origin story for the snake? I can say with almost certainty that we're going to see a young Tom Riddle before the end of movie 5.
Really, I think they should have focused on the in series books, and based it on those. Fantastic Beasts got its movie. Quiddich through the Ages would be a sports story that follows the Wigtown Wanderers, and the author/fan that follows them. Tales of Beedle the Bard would be an anthology of the 5 stories, directed by 5 different directors, with the framing device of James and Lily telling their infant son a bedtime story. Maybe they could have stretched out the stories into a few standalone films to really milk it.
The hobbit was perfect. What r u talking about.
@@c.l.1820 The film or the book? The book is great. It sits at 304 pages and is pretty much a short standalone story about a young Bilbo Baggins. The ring he steals from Gollum doesn't exhibit any corrupting qualities. All that was added later in LotR.
The film could have easily been a 2 parter, but they focused so much on adding elements from LotR that it padded out the length to 3 films.
i wouldn’t be surprised if warner did a tales of beedle the bard for hbo series
Wonder what they based it on...
Other franchises have also made this mistake of looking too far ahead into the future, planning a 5-movie multiverse and forgetting to focus on the present. Look at what happened to The Mummy reboot.
Jude Law as Dumbledore is severely overlooked😭 he plays him so well and he’s so funny
He does play him well. He finally plays Dumbledore the way he always was supposed to have been… a shady and manipulative character.
@@spaceodds1985 but with a heart, I mean, everyone manipulates reality just by existing so...
Every scene I'm watching him in I'm thinking, "Hey there's Jude Law" and then "why isn't he at least dressed like Dumbledore?'
I think Jude Law is a great actor in other movies, but I don't get all the praise for his Dumbledore. As long as he keeps wearing those dapper suits, I could never see him as Dumbledore. I just see him as Jude Law in a suit.
I agree that Jude Law did a great short-notice job of playing Character Who Shouldn't Even Be in This Movie.
The fact that I was only able to understand this movie from Pitch Meetings and Let Me Explain should tell you how complicated the plot is.
Maybe you should’ve tried re-watching it because I actually felt the same way towards Crimes of Grindelwald the first time I saw it and When I re-watched it not only do I understand it a lot more but I actually enjoy it almost more than the first fantastic beasts which is one of my favourite movies of all time :-)
A friend of mine and I had to read the Wikipedia description to understand it 🙈
I didn't need either of those channels to understand it it was very clear co me. Not that I didn't enjoy this recap especially the (Chillin) that is hilarious. And come on the purpose of pitch meetings is not to explain something it's to make fun of them that guy is a riot I did actually rewatch a video on movie flame on how crimes Of Grindelwald is not as bad as people say it is. The only hard part to fit in is McGonagall !
@@PaulZebraski McGonagle is not hard at all; I actually did research on this after Crimes of Grindelwald came out End it turns out that it’s all just fake and speculation/assumption when she was born it was never officially directly confirmed even on potter more. And therefore, that includes that she was actually older and was alive during this time period that she actually was because after all wizards live longer than Muggle Eh? :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 this gives me the same feeling Lumos in Prisoner of Azkaban gives me lmao
The funniest part is how much they promoted the movie in Brazil, because of Vicenza Santos (who's also played by a Brazillian actress), and in the actual movie, she barely has any lines.
Well they do that all the time it’s not just this movie it’s just how it is of which there would be a lot of if our retarded species would just learn to let go of money for God sake
One line actually...I've seen the movie 3x 😅
@@sexydirrtymoney Question: in All of those times watching the movie how did your opinions change if any at all? And related to the subject, what do you think about her role in the movie despite the fact that like you said she only has one line?
@@sexydirrtymoney at least she had a line the other guy didn't utter a word. It was just to fill the quota and appeal to the Asian market
@@SuperMoviemaster21 Overall, the movie could have been written / edited better but I think it's time for the franchise to get new writers / director to make it FRESH. On Vicenza Santos...WB should not have promoted too much on a role with one line 👀 She and the other candidate, a Chinese wizard seems like a diversity token to me!
I thought Mads Mikkelsen did a good job portraying Grindelwald. He actually reminded me of how Colin Ferrell portrayed Graves / Grindelwald. I understand on principle Depp should've been in the Secrets Of Dumbledore but honestly.... I didn't miss his presence. The film wasn't what I expected but I thought it was better than Crimes Of Grindelwald
Honestly? I also don't agree with Depp being threw out of the part, but for me he was miscast since the very beginning.
Depp was a good choice. Mads just looked like he didn’t have a clue on what he was upto
Colin should have been Grindelwald for all the films. I'm a big fan of him. He's great in all his roles.
This movie was most apparent in how it doesn't match magical canon.
1. Portkeys: They didn't need to touch the portkeys (most noticeable with the spinning portkey, they just had to be near it). Would have made Voldemort's job pretty easy if you just had to toss a portkey NEAR Harry lol.
Also when Jacob and Eulalie arrived in the train it definitely looked like floo powder. Coming from the fireplace, green flame and yet Jacob is saying how he hates Portkeys.
2. Apparation: apparently you no longer need to turn on your heels to apparate
3. Wordless magic: apparently everyone can do wordless magic now. Even though Voldemort, one of the strongest dark wizards of all time, has to use words to cast his spells apparently everyone else in this film has skills far superior to his own.
4. Dumbledore and Aberforth blocked the Avada Kedavra? Really? Again can't tell if that was the spell since wordless but it was green and Dumbledore said Grindewald was trying to kill. Anyways, apparently if two people trying to protect hits an oncoming Avada Kedavra with their spells it negates it? How does that make sense?
Just a bunch of nonense in this movie
1) and 2) you are over thinking the port keysAnd apparation, Especially the latter since they definitely did not turn on their heels in the Harry Potter movies either…… As well, I also believe that It’s been described in the box about them doing it at certain times as well.And for the former they did touch them And we’re just not near them
3) Voldemort has done wordless magic before and don’t forget pretty much all of these guys are professional wizards Who and other characters like them have also done Wordless magic in the previous movies and in the Harry Potter books and movies as well. Don’t forget they are highly trained professional wizards after all :-)
4) in case you haven’t noticed, credence was indeed affected by that spell which was nonetheless at least partially deflected hence why he didn’t die right away and was in the process of dying. Perhaps it could be some unexplained magic that’s never slashrarely been experienced before. Just because it hasn’t happened before the series even with it being a prequel doesn’t mean that it can’t be explained And or is even wrong let alone the fact that you don’t understand it also doesn’t mean that it’s wrong either eH?
@@SuperMoviemaster21 totally with the portkeys could have missed them touching it but to me it lookes like they just walked up to it before our suitcase scene. The book portkey at the banquet was also ambiguous since they didn't get sucked away upon touching the book pages but upon them touching eachothers hands? (Unless she had the book in her hands that I missed). Anyways it could be that since they expect us to be more familiar with the portkeys from Book 4 they didn't make the emphasis of everyone having to gather around and clasp the portkey tightly like they did with the shoe taking them to the Wizard's cup. I guess in short, at least in the case of the the portkeys, it seemed more stylistic which made it more ambiguous and took me a bit out of it.
with 4 I must have missed that because I thought it was his obscurus illness that made him so much weaker at the end (as in it was exponentially getting worse and worse even within that short period at the end) and not that part of the Killing Curse made it to him. If it was only partially deflected that makes much more sense, I thought from the one viewing I had that it completely negated it which would seem to take away a lot of lethalness and mystique surrounding it.
@@haleyolson1802 See, that is why you maybe need See this again in theatres for I actually felt Exactly the same way towards crimes of Grindelwald and when I went Inside again not only did I get it more but I actually thoroughly enjoyed it so much that I consider to be one of the best Wizarding world movies and almost better than the first fantastic beasts which is one of my top favourite movies of all time :-) so see you never really know about these things until after you truly think about and analyze but not over analyze them and that sometimes involves having to see them again :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 true! 😊
Re: avada kedavra, can it be like throwing a shield to someone who’s in line of incoming gun fire? Does that make sense?
As someone who grew up reading the Harry Potter books AS they released I am laughing so hard at the idea of Albus The Ends Justify The Means Dumbledore being called “pure of heart”
I actually saw Mads and Jude more compatible than the pale white Johnny Depp (I love Depp btw) I liked it more than the second but that duel between Credance and Jude made no sense...did they go in another reality to avoid destroying the muggle world?
Yes! Borrowed mirror dimension from Dr. Strange! Lessens the stakes, IMO, and makes the fight less gripping =\
Member in Fantastic Beasts I when they literally blew out the side of a building + ripped up roads? Humph~
@@waterywingz omg you are right! I wish it was explained because I was lost lol
To be fair, I doubt that Johnny Depp was responsible for the hair and makeup used for Grindelwald. Well, the heterochromia was his idea; he's said that in interviews. The white hair and pallor seems to have been out of his wheelhouse.
From what I can gather. Dumbledore noticed Credence and basically put a glamour on him. Credence lost before the fight even started. Credence was fine in the first movie but they shouldn't have kept bringing him back.
@@waterywingz I think any Wizarding fights lessens the stakes when it comes to revealing the Wizarding World. Death will be there but seeing the destruction and constructing fear already lessen the stakes with MIB-esque memory wipes and government-esque cover ups with the means of magic.
Pretty much it's the Wizarding World and Muggles just lived in it. When I think about it kinda lessens Grindlewald's and Voldemort's motivation to destroy them. Then again Muggles were destroying each other and bleeding the destruction to the Wizarding World.
Honestly, this series could have been amazing if they did it right... Lean into the fantastic beasts idea, have Newt and the gang established in the first movie come together to stop a group of Magical Poachers or a group that is searching for an ancient beast that would grant them unrivaled power. Even though the movies involve the animals in some capacity, they feel very sidelined when that the entire premise of the original and that's Newt's main thing... I feel like they tried too hard when they started connecting this directly to HP characters like Dumbledore.
I remember when they name dropped Dumbledore and the fact that Newt was expelled from Hogwarts, it felt so cool. This is a new character for us, one who's come from a place we know, but is doing his own thing. It felt fresh, but they really dropped the ball.
Maybe if the culmination of the series was going after Grindlewald, using beasts from all the movies and everyone coming together, it would have worked. But turning this into
This movie was okay. Better than Crimes of Grindelwald but still had some issues with story and plot concerns. Especially concerning contradictions with what has been set up before. It was a good movie in terms of trying to fix the mistakes of the second film and Madds was great as Grindelwald but the fantastic beast aspect of it is getting lost.
Eh. This one was boring the previous one wasn't. I did appreciate the acting tho.
@@Ash-uf4fv Fair enough. I did only see it once so maybe I was so bored that day that this movie didn’t faze me as much. Though I don’t think I’ll watch it again. Second movie I saw it twice and still found issues with it, but in its defense it did have more fantastic beasts than this one did. Or maybe it just feels that way.
“Hey can I ask you something.”
“Of course.”
“What the hell is going on.”
“Exactly.”
This perfectly sums up why I didn't like this movie lol
Me too, I honestly understood it more from Pitch Meetings and Let Me Explain!
Well if you actually stopped and thought about this movie and give it a chance maybe even see the second time then maybe just maybe you might actually understand it more. I’m sure you probably Encountered that with many other movies that you’ve seen right?
@@SuperMoviemaster21 ugh listen if you liked it fine but don't go telling others to like something it's just pretentious.
@@TheRibottoStudios Yes but I’m just saying/merely asking you to consider what I’m saying here and apply it for you may very well be making a mistake if only to you :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 No, they don't have to. If they didn't like it, they didn't like it. Case closed.
The stake in the heart for this movie was Jacob being accused of being an assassin. How? How does anyone in this world imagine that a Muggle could use a wand, could attack Grindelwald with a storm, is any kind of threat to anyone?
they didnt know he was a muggle
I only really care about Jacob's Story and that preaty much ended in this movie, if they are going to continue the story I hope they leave him and Queeny out of it.
Well if you want to be able to give them the opportunity for that, then need to worry about more is people refusing to go and see #FantasticBeastsTheSecretsOfDumbledore all because of her comments; I’d highly encourage and recommend everyone [please Encourage as many other people as you can as well please :-) See it as many times as they can in theaters, and even If possible,buy a ticket for it In place of going to see another movie so that way it still gets money without you actually having to see it multiple times. Buying as many merchandise directly related to it as possible will also truly help.
Also remember that if you’re refusing to see it because of #JohnnyDeppIsMyGrindelwald Then please remember that this movie needs to do well so as to give Johnny the chance to actually come back in the Later movies, For the actor who played MacNair The executioner was re-casted for prisoner of Azkaban and then came back for order of the Phoenix. The bottom line is that if #FantasticBeastsTheSecretsOfDumbledore Doesn’t do well, And they don’t make the remaining two movies,then Johnny definitely will never be back as Grindelwald!Plus you also have to remember that it’s about to be a new company with new people over seeing it, So as such you were technically not paying that company and are actually giving more of a chance than not having him actually return. Especially depending on what may happen with the results of his trial that’s going to be happening shortly after the movie comes out, the new people taking over Warner Bros. right before it comes out……
Also remember in regards to her that she doesn’t necessarily get a whole lot of money from this, as well the fact remains that as many people have pointed out that she already has so much money that not supporting the series will not really change any kind of “power“ that you may have against her, and after all the series should not suffer at all because of her for Regardless of what you may think, nothing I repeat nothing will ever ever truly take away what a series overall truly means to you let alone other people, And again it’s not The series that’s the problem at all in any kind of way :-)
Also keep in mind that even though it’s not the best example they have at least one transgender person or someone who identifies themselves as “They” in the cast so much for her transphobia……
They say that Creedence is his brother and then in the next movie it’s his nephew. They thought we wouldn’t notice… but we did.
counterpoint: Grindelwald, who famously manipulates and probably didn't know for sure, told him the first thing.
wasn’t it the point? grindelwald was manipulating credence, hence the change from brother to nephew
@@toyang.. loool but what difference does it make if he is a brother or nephew, wasnt the point neing that he was a dumbledore
@@hunterzolomon1303 i think they wantto kick ezra off the show, so made his role less important
@@toyang.. Weak excuse. The real reason is Rowling messed up her timeline ONCE AGAIN and the fans pointed out to her that it's impossible for Credence to be a brother because Albus' parents were already dead. They couldn't conceive someone as young as Credence. So Rowling did a retcon ONCE AGAIN and made him a nephew.
7:57 “but he’s there giving birth to a new fantastic beast” caught me off guard. A very interesting choice for the story, but it got the audience invested for sure lol.
13:50 That's what I've always thought! Dumbledore *says* he's sworn off personal power, yet as headmaster of Britain's magical school he has a hella lot of power. He was also head of the Wizengamot in book canon, and even yes, Supreme Mugwump! So the only position of power that Albus has consistently refused to take is head of the Ministry of Magic, which as portrayed in the books isn't all that powerful. Curious, isn't it?
They promised us Fantastic beats and seeing the other wizard schools and instead we get a convoluted mess.
Grindelwald should have been a two part movie and then the series could have moved on.
But if the series [Hopefully] continues then we may very well see the other Wizarding schools. It may be hard to follow but once you fully get it and understand it from Rewatching it/seeing it again then you’ll truly realize how interconnected it truly is; trust me I felt the exact same way towards crimes of Grindelwald when I first saw it but then when I re-watched it and I only understood it but I thoroughly enjoyed it I consider to be one of the best Wizarding World movies now :-)
It does make sense for Grindelwald to be involved since he would’ve been rising to power the time and it would’ve made sense for him not be included since he’s a major player in the Wizarding world and it also helps relieve the series to the fantastic beasts that live within all of us because that’s what we all essentially are and who better to emphasize the fantastic beasts of humanity then someone like Grindelwald who would’ve been on the rise to power within this timeframe? :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 Eh I’ve already watched again and liked it less because the cool thing about voldy as a villain is you don’t see him in the beginning stories but instead see his affect on people. When he finally rises to power again it’s earned and then he’s in power for a bit causing terror.
Grindy on the other hand is becoming like dr eggman where it’s almost Funny every time he gets foiled and there isn’t a suspense to his presence. He’s just bad because the movie tells you and there isn’t a tension to his growing ambition.
I think there is a way to incorporate him but by less is more allowing newt and his beasts to have good standalone adventures without constantly forcing them together with grindy.
The first movie works because it’s primarily a wizarding world building in America fish out of water story with grindy as a threat later. It could have been even more compelling if newt and grindy were friends or something but they aren’t earning him as antagonist in my opinion and it’s like desperate sequel franchise bait
The Harry Potter books worked well because they are stand alone mystery novels that eventually became a wizard war saga later
dumbledore was just practicing so he could perfectly manipulate harry for 7 (arguably all 17) years of his life
12:16 Tina's not in this one because Katherine Waterston angered J.K. Rowling by openly calling for support for trans rights. Since JKR is a middle-aged woman who never outgrew the Mean Girl stage, she punished Waterston by essentially writing her out of the movie.
Either that or Waterston has a good agent and got her out of appearing in this mess.
@@spaceodds1985 It’s probably both. The agent just said we’re getting you out of this after JKR is a terrible person.
For me my biggest problem with the fantastic beast series is that nothing matters, there are no stakes cuz we already know the outcome
"Mutual respect for one another's abilities." That is just as bad when they (Cartoon Network in 1999-2000) said that Sailor Neptune and Sailor Uranus were "cousins" in Sailor Moon S (season 3 of the original anime series.)🙄😏
the funniest part is they still didn't edit out the romantic parts so then it was gay AND incestuous. they really bamboozled themselves
I will say that this series suffers so much from there not being a book. The Harry Potter movies had books that the viewer could read beforehand and fill in the gaps. A lot of things in the Phantastic Beasts movies do not really make sense in the already established universe but could in theory be established. But they aren't.
My friends biggest gripe with this movie was that such a huge event like in the third movie had to have been mentioned somewhere in the original books. Also everyone (really everyone) being able to do wandless magic, the confusing floo powder/portkey thing, the election taking place in not Germany(?), Tina being slowly written out of the story, and so much more.
Like, I could come up with some reasons for those plot ambiguities but those things should have had a book. That would at least lead to a much more streamlined story that could flow so much better.
Let's be honest, at this point, J.K. is just throwing whatever out there because Harry Potter fans will still eat it up. This series has no direction, at all. It's just going here and there. Which, I get is good because they can take it anywhere and include whatever they'd like, but also not good because it can go anywhere and the movies don't even really connect because there's no source material, no direction for it. If there is, it doesn't seem that clear to anyone watching, and it went off the rails with the second movie. I never even saw that one because of what I was hearing about it. This just seems to complicate it even more. Why couldn't we stick with him going around and studying and discovering creatures? That was fun and I was actually looking forward to seeing all the animals we'd heard mentioned in the books and in the Fantastic Beasts book.
@@BooDotBoo I was the biggest Potterhead and I did not support this film, so she has managed to alienate even hardcore fans
The voiceless spells bothered me, because like you said, it is a difficult thing to do and now every one is doing it constantly???!! I love hearing the different spells!
The scenes were cool, but could have been so much cooler.
The Curse and Fantastic books are not books, they are movie scripts, so only good for the hearing impaired not for the curious for more depth.
2:41 Great one, all the applause, oscar for script writing I nearly missed it
It was amazing word play
maybe i’m the only one who loves secrets of dumbledore, the effects, fight scene with credence and albus, the chemistry between jude and mads is amazing
I actually love it to be considered to be on the top Six best of the Wizarding World movies overall! :-) I’m actually excited to see the second time in theatres :-)
You're not. There are a lot of us who love it
their chemistry make me love the movie and I watched it twice cause of them!
the chemistrrrrryyyy 😍
something i appreciated about the last one is that for the tiny albus and gellert flashbacks they brought back the same actors that played them in the last harry potters flashbacks as well, like it had been years but I remembered it was them and I appreciated the continuity. i haven't seen this one yet, and I know they don't care about making sense with the worldbuilding so lets not think about that, but I wish the movies had the guts to not shy away from the relationship and actually show it, like show affection and actual scenes, not just cutable lines, but oh well. and I love that that "the secrets" are all things you know if you've read the books or know any basic thing lmao, I've seen short fan films online that did a better job of showing the story and expanding on facts we knew than just you know telling
Trust me there are a lot more secrets that they reveal in this movie that were not previously known from reading the box. And of course know that it’s not just about Albus but the whole Dumbledore family as a whole, including related to what Dumbledore does in the movie, the secrets to who he truly is. And for your FYI, there’s actually a lot more and even Better continuity to the movies then what was in the previous ones Including the previous David Yates Harry Potter movies that he really really should’ve done all along…… :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 i'm talking more about tha fact that jk rowling will invent whatever the heck she wants as she goes along even if it makes no sense with what she previously established, and then claim that it was always the plan or makes sense. like saying albus is pure of heart when he has shown multiple times that he isn't. but I haven't seen the movie so I can't say anything specific about it, I was just going off the video, and the things mentioned were things we all know from before or things invented for the new movies, which I cant speak on
@@neivilde.1242 well then you truly need to go out and see the new movies that way you actually know what we’re talking about Ian or see if you can actually make sense of it yourself which you may be able to more than this guy here and even me who is truly defending it can. And again if you really think about it Albus always is pure of heart having learned from his mistakes and doing things like neglecting the level of power further proves that he is because he knows that he will not be pure if he has that kind of power and even with Harry despite the claims of “raising him like a pig for Slaughter” he always knew that Hilary would be able to come back after Voldemort killed him because of the use of Lily’s blood when he got resurrected; Again if you truly experienced it and truly think about it then you’ll not only get it but may actually thoroughly enjoy it and be able to see that it’s not as bad as you were others may think or even how it originally May seem :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 yeah i'll go see the movie eventually, I'm waiting for it to come out digitally
@@neivilde.1242 But if you wait for that, but only with a movie possibly not make enough money for them to make the remaining movies, but you may not appreciate it as much since it’s meant to be seen on the big screen and you may very well be more engaged and into it. Trust me it’s well worth seeing as soon as you can especially since you say you are a big Harry Potter fan and what I said especially if you like it all the nostalgia callbacks, then you’re definitely gonna love and appreciate this one :-)
I liked the first film cause Newt was the main character and it was mostly about you know, *The Beasts*. The others are just trash. Newt was fun and the beasts were cute and interesting
Madds was so good as grindlewald i hope he stays as him
I think a big problem of the series is every movie is about taking down Grindelwald instead of having newt and the gang go on these light hearted adventures and use the Grindelwald as the overshadowing plot until the very end idk just a thought
What's interesting about alot of reviews on the Secrets of Dumbledore is how some reviewers (not all), question a studios motive when they bring up politics which is interesting because the XMen animated cartoons in the early 90's centered around discrimination, politics, and the ways that both humans and mutants handled their individual experiences. The XMen series ran for about 10+ years with no complaints nor push back. I say all of that to say that the level of complexity of story writing, juggling each characters own ambitions, the human element, and the eventually war that is coming leaves me a little amazed that teenagers are able to get this story. The movies usually don't do the books justice so now I am curious to read thr prequel to the Harry Potter novels.
It didn’t run that long, but it returning this year or next.
There are two shows after it, that had similar themes, but one reimagined everything into a public high school thing, and a Wolverine lead show, that’s just him trying to prep for the dystopian future of sentinels.
XMen was always an allegory to the civil rights movement tho, in the same way movies like Hunger Games or Civil War are bound to end up political. Harry Potter went from a moody and hilarious kid learning he’s a wizard, a trust fund baby and the Chosen One all while dealing with very concerning issues like a particular homework he’s in no way shape or form capable of doing without copying from his friend…. to whatever Fantastic Beasts is. That’s why is heavily criticized, cause any political element is shoehorned in for fake wokeness.
@@biazacha I wouldn’t say that. Where and what exactly is the fake woke Ness here?
@@biazacha “X-men was an allegory…”
Just stop, you’re 100% verifiably wrong lol
@@biazacha Harry Potter has always been about the politics of muggle and wizard relations, dark and light magic, pure blood vs. muggle born.! ESPECIALLY in the second half of the series.!
Dude. The stylization of this video is brilliant. Thank you.
I thought the magic deer should have bowed before the normal guy Jacob because everyone kept saying he had heart and all that crap.
9:58 "Bunty gets Tina's lines" I screamed!! 😂😂
I will never understand how WB missed giving Yusuf a proper twist. In fact, I would never understand why that character existed in the first place since it didn’t move the original plan forward in any significant way. Mind boggling stuff.
Harry Potter with wizards and witches are cool and all. But watching a English Steve Irwin with magical beast would have been cooler.
"...If you mention camps, are you Naazzi gonna see what's going on"🤣🤣🤣 I caught that one
thank you for the recap omg I was no planning on watching this movie so this summary is just what I needed! love your videos so much
Same! Exactly what I needed to get caught up without having to waste time watching it
You’re making a big mistake by not checking the movie out for even if Come to a conclusion from watching this and or other reviews then upon experiencing yourself you may very well notice or realize things that these people are overlooking which I can definitely tell you that they certainly are without thinking critically about it [and perhaps having too much wine]
@@SuperMoviemaster21 nah, I'm good mate
@@emidal05 Seriously, you are going to regret it especially in the sense that you’re not helping a lot of people who actually like these movies and we’re just gonna end up being mad at you but you may very well regret and not be glad you did especially since you have the wrong attitude and mindset towards it. I seen it you could’ve very well seen things that this idiot and other reviewers overlooked and not just from drinking wine, for hearing about things is very different from actually experiencing them yourself, for we are all different and therefore see and experience things and get out of them From every single person to the next, hence why I am defending it here and he doesn’t like it or rather doesn’t get it because he went in with the wrong mine said without actually fully examine it in the right way again being too influenced by other things
@@SuperMoviemaster21 Nothing is stopping you from watching this movie as many times as you want in the theater. If this is the best Warner Bros can do for a HP movie then it deserves to fail.
you really got to love the way L.M.E does this The style, the comical hits, it's wonderful. dude you do an awesome job.
"I honestly wasn't expecting to see so many people transitioning on J.K's turf." I see what you did there
"They were on charmed. He was bewitched." I'm jealous of your genius.
“Having illusions about his ✨Almost Lover✨” 🙋🏼♀️
It would have been way better to make fantastic beasts a Indiana Jones type movie series and then seperatly a movie series about Dumbledore&politics in the wizarding world
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I personally enjoyed this movie so much, it might actually be my favourite of the three FB movies so far! I loved the idea of the countersight plans, and how it weaved in and out of the main plot, and how Dumbledore's secret were met up with along the way. And the ending was so sweet and gave some nice finality, in a hopeful way.
I like this movie. It's plot doesn't baby you-which by the comments sounds like what most people want.
"bunty gets tina's lines" it's sad because it's true.
2:30 that joke, wonderful
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them: Two Brief Two Cases
I can’t 😂
Look they've could have made it simple: Have Grindelwald want X amount of extremly rare beasts for some extreme form of magical spell that would allow him to, let's say, destroy all the boundaries between the wizard world and the muggle world in an instance (like all the spells that keep muggles from not noticing the magical places, Like DIagon alley, the Blacks family home etc etc etc.......)
They could even have had them all in the dark about why he was looking for them. Credence would be the first, an obscuris, and then move on to others.
That would have atleast had it make sence as to why Newt was so involved in this: Dumbledore knew he was the greatest zoologist in the world, because he trained him.
But nooooo. They made one good film, then they lost track and now only want to do "Young Dumbledore" instead.
I think the core problem of these movies is that JK Rowling is not a good screenplay writer. I mean everything's there, but it just doesnt gel into an actual good movie. BTW I actually really like Mads as Grindewald.
Fr I dont know what the writers and director were thinking with this installment, it was super messy. Maybe 6 movies wouldn’t have been a bad idea because there’s SO much to unpack. OR IF THIS WAS A SERIES SMH.
I've been looking forward to this
that joke about transitioning on JK's turf was perfection. Kudos
Watched the movie. So, Jacob was given a coreless wand by Dumbledore. That wand was most likely gotten at Olivander's. I'm to believe that Olivander made a wand from some tree and didn't give it a core? Olivander makes fake wands?
I didn’t notice until this video that the woman that gets Jacob was in Flamel’s book in the last movie.
Over the past 5 years I’ve slowly started to lose any affection for this franchise with everything that’s happened to it and the people involved.
That American rejects reference was beautiful man!!! WOW XD
I actually liked this new one
I’m not sure about the timeline tho
Based on Credence’s hair at least several years have passed after the previous movie
I actually love this movie, if not just for the first scene with Jude and Mads just doing superb acting together. I was so sad for them that Dumbledore and Grindlewald can't reconcile because Grindle has no remorse
Fantastic Beasts seems like a mess to just sit thru and watch. thank you
If you truly watch it and truly engage and think about it even if you may have to multiple times, once you truly get it not only will you understand it but you also enjoy it even if you’re not a major Harry Potter fan. Trust me I felt the same way towards Crimes of Grindelwald but then when I re-watched it again what I’m stating above actually happened, And With other movies as well which I’m sure you and others have probably experienced as well EH?
The Depp fans claiming that his absence hurt this movie are just simping in the drama surrounding his court case. Both Colin Ferrel and Mads Mikelson blew him out of the water and are much more convincing than a disheveled albino. Depps box office pull is negligible considering the first movie did fine the second was awful and the third, though an improvement, won’t make the kind of money to support a franchise.
You explained the plot so well but I still have appsolutly no idea what's happening in any of these movies
The thing is they were supposed to be confusing Grindlewald but ended up confusing the audience. Everything looked amazing but I was still scratching my head thinking BUT WHY????
Just watched it today, and while it has problems (Theseus's rescue from prison went on way too long, for example), I overall liked it better than the last one. Would a film series focused on Dumbledore as title character instead of Newt and his beasts have made more sense for this installment? Yes. Is it the series focusing solely on Newt and the beasts that people wanted? No, but we're 3 movies in so I just say "fuck it" and embrace the madness. While it's still rather convoluted, it has a stronger anchor than in Crimes of Grindenwald with the election and the Qilin. It also goes out of its way to answer some of the nonsense of the previous movie or trim out the unnecessary parts of it; I completely forgot Nagini was even a thing, that's how little she contributed to the story. I'm glad she was cut off, there were enough characters to deal with. Although, I would've liked to have known more about the other election candidates, Tao and Santos, find out why Santos is so pure of heart as to be elected. I mainly rooted for her cause she's a woman and Latina, that's good enough for little old Latina me.
What I actually really liked was how they handled Dumbledore and Grindenwald's relationship. JK TERFling's initial backstory for them was that Dumbledore was manipulated by and had an unrequited love for Grindenwald, which I didn't like cause it was a missed opportunity to make Grindenwald a completely different villain from Voldemort, instead both being evil power hungry muggle haters who want to take over the world because evil and power. I wanted their relationship to be more like Profesor X and Magneto from X- Man: 2 men who love each other dearly, but are separated by opposing beliefs. Magneto is a Villain, but he's a Villain with a good point, and he genuinely wants the best for his kind. That's where I wanted Dumbledore and Grindenwald to go, and to a certain extent they did.
I particularly hone in on their fight in the end, after the blood oath breaks. They have spent 2 whole movies sending other people to defeat them because the oath prevents them from attacking each other. Yet when the oath breaks, there's nothing holding them back and they have the other by the proverbial throat... they still can't finish each other off. Why? I like how after they return to reality, Grindewald asks Dumbledore, "Who's gonna love you now?" And how, just before he escapes, he says "I was never your enemy. Then and now." Maybe it's just me, but I read a slew of implications behind those lines. That Grindenwald returned that love (not a healthy love, mind you, but love nonetheless), his heartbreak at Dumbledore's perceived betrayal and even that, despite everything, he still cares for Albus in some way. Very Cherik.
And as much as I love Johnny Deep and celebrate his triumph, Mads Mikkelsen comes much nearer to my ideal for Grindewald than Johnny. He and Jude Law also have great chemistry together, something I'm not sure could've been achieved to the same level with Johnny. I also liked Lally, also I spent the entire movie trying to pinpoint that accent.
Overall, it's a far stronger movie than Crimes of Grindewald. I in no way attribute this to JK TERFling, but to Steve Kloves, who very obviously script doctored the shit out of whatever her 1st draft was. Thank God he came back.
Tbh I’ve just been watching the spoiler reviews cause I’m so uninterested on this new me after the last one
Oh trust me you’re only hurting yourself by doing that. Why ask me see it for yourself you’ll actually quite likely be able to point out and noticed things other people didn’t for better or for worse. Have you even tried re-watching crimes of Grindelwald? Because I actually felt pretty much the same way when I saw it but then when I re-watched it not only do I actually get it but I actually really like it now I consider to be among the best of the Wizarding world movies :-)
i cant thank u enough for pronouncing his name G R I N D E L V V A L D🤗
I thoroughly enjoyed this LME, thank you! 😎😂😍
Still love this movie, idk why, i just wanted to go braindead and have a good time watching this movie, 10/10, love the movie, and i believe Dumbledore's wand shares a core with The Elder Wand, PRIORI INCANTATEM!
I tried and couldn’t. It was soooooo bad
@@DadsCigaretteRun same. I was really looking forward to it but it was sooo boring. Majority of it was walking and standing and talking. I either needed more animals, more fights, etc.
@@DadsCigaretteRun Have you tried reconsidering and reevaluating the problems that you have with it? Maybe try to see a second time? Believe me I Felt similar towards crimes of Grindelwald But when I re-watched it not only did I fully truly get it but I also was enthrallingly entertained by it so much that I consider to be one of the best Wizarding World movies and maybe you may very well Feel the same towards this one :-)
@@SuperMoviemaster21 I might re-watch it but I probably won’t go out of my way. There was some decent scenes especially when Dumbledore was talking about his sister which I found fascinating but that was about it. Genuinely hated this movie, the worst Harry Potter movie I’ve ever seen hands-down
I still think the first Fantastic beasts trumps its sequels but Secrets Of Dumbledore although its story-telling was weird, was full of subtle and unique lore drops that set up the events we know today, it confirmed Ariana was an Obscurial which we've been speculating for years! There is so much more, although the manner in which all these lore drops are dropped, either way, Info is Info, and i need more info.
These all encapsulating video about a series of movie or seasons of a show are always the best bro !
I haven't yet seen the movie but from what I saw but I never bought Dumbledore and grendels being lovers They don't seem to have that type of chemistry
lovers don't train to fight each other but to each his own
This is supposed to be a movie about why wizards didn't fight in WWII...
I like the fact that you believe Dumbledore was speaking metaphorically when he said "Because I was in love with you." Dumbledore has always spoken in metaphors and riddles as we knew him in the original movies. He is not much different here.
I just watch this in the cinema 4 hours ago and I slept in the middle of it thanks for this 🤣
I watched the first, fell asleep in the second and didn't bother with the third.
This video while excellent still did not clear the plot up for me at all.
Seriously, you are going to regret it especially in the sense that you’re not helping a lot of people who actually like these movies and we’re just gonna end up being mad at you but you may very well regret and not be glad you did especially since you have the wrong attitude and mindset towards it. I seen it you could’ve very well seen things that this idiot and other reviewers overlooked and not just from drinking wine, for hearing about things is very different from actually experiencing them yourself, for we are all different and therefore see and experience things and get out of them From every single person to the next, hence why I am defending it here and he doesn’t like it or rather doesn’t get it because he went in with the wrong mine said without actually fully examine it in the right way again being too influenced by other things
So glad you're doing this! I actually really enjoyed this movie
It would be funny if they keep recasting Grindelwald until the last film and nobody acknowledges it in-universe
Did no one else notice Dumbledore removing the Obscurus from Credence?!?! Idc Credence is Ariana?!? I seriously think that Albus with the help of Grindelwald found a way to remove the obscurus from Ariana which would explain why he was willing to take her with them to travel the world before Aberforth found out. The biggest clue to this is in the new movie when Albus and credence are fighting he uses a spell that literally removes it from him!! credence looks like he’s dying in the scene and Fawkes flies over him burning then Dumbledore then puts it back in him!!
It tells a lot about these movies that not even your recap and explanation can make them sound interesting.
The puns were top notch, you didn't even have to explain 😂
10:05 "That bottle would be called 'tomorrow'." So true. Cracked me up! 🤣🤣😁😁
I guess the backstage team studied the history of this and probably figured out that this style of stopper was very popular during that era. I doubt they expect many people to notice. But that was a great joke, LME. :D
I'm glad I wasn't the only one to notice lally's accent change over the two films lmao
Thank you for making this video, I legit forgot we already had 2 movies before this. For months I thought this was the second movie 😂
these movies VISUALLY are so damn good TT I wish it was more about the fantastic beasts and less about dumbledore and his issues. Its such a mess... did they just not plan the series before starting or smthing???
Your channel has grown so much since I started watching :')
J.K. and her Fantastical Views have kind of killed Harry Potter for me, so I have very little interest in the movies in this series. The first one was pretty good because it was nice to see the various creatures, which I thought was the whole point of this series, but now it's going way somewhere else, almost like a weird fantasy soap opera, so I'm kind of happy I lost interest. And there are more of these movies planned? I'll leave it to the Potterheads who still enjoy it. I'm just watching this review because I like the way you explain things... and I'm curious and don't plan to go see this movie, anyway, so yeah.
I just wanted to end on Credence and his dad sharing a meal over his moms portrait, I thought that was gonna be the whole fulfilling last scene... big upset
I hope you're not referring to the portrait of Ariana in the Hog's Head, or else Aberforth is no better than the Gaunts. In fact he'd be even worse lmao.
@@jorgenbaert924 I mean more "this is your mom, you wouldve loved her" kinda convo... not "you have power! unlock and be unashamed of it so i can use it to my will!"
@@benn.official_ I was hinting at the Gaunts' incestuous relationships by marrying with their cousins lol
@@jorgenbaert924 OH, that. Honestly been desensitized to it cuz the internet. At this point, ya lay with who ya lay with.
I honestly thought Dumbledore and Grindelwald moments were the saving grace of this whole movie, seriously.
One of my friends- this movie was so good it was so funny cause of the one crab dancing scene?? 😂
All these actors are way to good for this movie 😅
To Make Magic Great Again I’m dying 😂😂
Jk loses the plot = accurate description
love that you call him Grindel lmao
That "transitioning on jk's terf" line is perfection!
I loved this movie but hated how the trailer literally showed every cool part of the movie....
I'm new to this channel and I'm verry impressed with your word choices at times, very smart.
That realm that Dumbledore battles Credence is something that happens in Order of the Phoenix, they just don't put that part in the movie