Street Preacher Proves God And Converts Atheist?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 лип 2022
- Dawah is Easy, apparently. So easy, that god can be proved to an atheist, converting him to islam on the spot...
Though, does that REALLY happen? or was the atheist just being polite to this street preacher? What do you think?
Original Video here - • "Prove There is a GOD ...
Check out @ApostateAladdin here - / apostatealaddin
Hamza Video - • How Ignorant ARE Athei...
How an atheist should respond to a Street Preacher - • How An Atheist Should ...
Atheist response playlist - • Atheist Responses
Patreon - / theskeptick
Facebook - / theskeptick
Instagram - / theskeptick
Twitter - / the_skeptick
TikTok - tiktok.com/theskeptick
Everything in this video is just an opinion, and should be treated as such - though it is important to ask questions. Any humour or sarcasm is aimed towards the words and actions of the individuals, and not intended to be a personal attack on any individual themselves, under the act of free speech
Title - Street Preacher Proves God And Converts Atheist?
tags - Street Preacher,dawahiseasy,dawah,atheist,agnostic,atheist vs muslim,atheist vs theist,theist vs atheist,proof of god,proving god,theist proves god,converting atheist,theist converts atheist,street preacher converts atheist,can you prove god,how to prove god,is god real,apostate aladdin,the skeptick,Skeptick,street preacher fast,street preacher uk,uk muslim,is there a god
"and the Quran doesn't contain one scientific mistake" is technically correct i guess, it contain loads of scientific errors, not just one.
It's true. The Quran doesn't contain one scientific error. Probably because it doesn't contain science.
Qwer Ron and buy bull are the same exact thing both plagiarized from each other
Yes 😂😂
@@tod1way Id say both yes and no on that one.
It, like the Bible, contains several easily observable scientific facts.
Like the verse some apologists love siting as a proof of divine insight: "Saltwater and freshwater don't mix" which is easily observable by anyone living near a rivers exit to the sea and a bit of curiosity.
(And also incorrect as it just takes time for it to mix)
@@klebbe1 I don't remember that passage at all and I read the Bible twice. Though, it was definitely tedious and most of it I didn't retain afterwards. Just a few bits and pieces stuck in my brain, like the fact that in Jeremiah 10: 2-7 God forbids what sounds like Christmas trees.
As another ex-Muslim, here's the underlying question: If the Quran had all these scientific details, why didn't early Islamic scholars inform the world about them centuries ago? Why wait until *after* scientists make the discoveries, to then claim the Quran said them "all along"? They just re-translate and re-interpret verses to vaguely align with current science and then claim it's a miracle (each Arabic word usually has multiple meanings). Meanwhile, the verses which are explicit errors are just "metaphysical" not to be taken literally.
PS. Even the Hindus claim the big bang and planetary orbits were mentioned in their books. Same wordplay.
Genesis too, claims that earth and heaves were together and separated nothing new, same shit different day
Similarly, for the scientific errors, if they do not mean what they mean on the surface, then we should expect classical scholars who spent their lives studying the Quran and who rely on the Quran and not external scientific knowledge to also make similar statements, however, this isn't the case, we instead see classical scholars endorsing those exact same scientific errors that we claim the Quran has and only later muslims, armed with new scientific knowledge, purposely trying to force a scientifically correct interpretation down our throats. Some examples will be the meaning of Nur in S10:5 and "Spread the earth" found in S13:3.
That's religion for ya...god of the gaps
@@j.mtherandomguy8701 Very well said
They do that because it works.. Christians pretend now they knew the earth was round then they said they always knew the earth revolved around the sun now they say god made the big bang christians have no dignity they just make up the rules as they go like we are to stupid to notice
He almost converted me but thankfully that Aladdin guy in the video shook some sense into me
Good one
Wait a minute...
Hahahaha
@Sabbath D'inverno the earth isn't flat
@Sabbath D'inverno I don't care if it's considered flat "in scripture". In reality, the earth is a sphere
"You're going to university to study science or something." Clearly my dude knows what he's talking about.
That's actually the first thing I heard that would have made me impolite myself.
Just imagine the guy answering "Yeah, and you are here to talk me about your imaginary friend... Or something" 😂
I never knew Mohammed flying to the moon on a horse was scientifically accurate. I stand corrected.
On a horse with a human face - just to be scientifically accurate..
As far as I remember he actually flew to heaven. My favourite part about the story was when Allah told Muhammad that Muslims are supposed to pray 50 times a day. After that Muhammad met Moses again who he already met before in heaven and told him about the prayers. Then Moses told him that the amount of prayers was way too much and after that Muhammad returned to Allah who made 40 prayers out of it.Then he returned to Moses again and he still thought it was too much. So this whole thing went on until he and Allah agreed on 5 prayers and Moses was alright with it. So it was Moses who questioned the all knowing Allah and decided how many prayers Muslims should do every day.
@Peabrain The Victorious
Being german I didn't even know about the sitcom - maybe it's based on the qur'an? 😅
Mohammed's weird horse is named "Buraq" or "al-Buraq" - he supposedly used it to ride to heaven and back.
There is a interpretation where it was just a dream but most Muslims don't accept this interpretation.
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool -- Samuel Clemens aka Mark Twain
Exactly 👌
Have you noticed that James is looking at that guy like "he's bad shit crazy , I'm not going to engage in an argument ". He just nods, smile and gently agree.
It reminds me of the PUA UA-camrs displaying their "great" skills at getting phone numbers from women. They would often find a lone person, borderline coerce her into giving a phone number and call it a win
In the reality the woman was awkwardly smiling and noding at their jokes because she didn't want to anger the men who already proved they didn't care about her boundaries. And the given phone number was fake of course
See, I'm polite, but I'm not *that* polite. I give 2 variations of "not interested" before walking away or closing the door.
@@jursamaj it can be assumed that the guy talked to ten people who did just that before happening upon poor James here
I lmfao every time the Tick retorts to the apologist’s adulation of “peace be upon him…” with “leaf be upon her…” 😂. Thanks for that!
I had fun doing that 😂😂
Ohhhh my god. As an ex Muslim, “Leaf be upon her” almost killed me. 😂😂😂
He said “leaf be upon her” I’m yelling 😂😂😂😂😂
Several times and u shouldn't joke about the rainbow giraffe it's real and u are putting urself outside the forest paradise. U ve been warned!
@@puraLusa That's our God “leaf be upon her” .
@@African_Atheist leaf be upon her. 😂
@@puraLusa “leaf be upon her” indeed. LOL
Well... She's an herbivores no?
I as well walk up to random guys with microphones and ask them to prove gods in 5 minutes. Such a dumb setup.
Yep, just as bad as banana man Ray Comfort.
It took 22 minutes to dismantle 5 minutes of rhetoric.
That’s pretty good. 👍
Well, it doesn't help that the use-car-salesman speaks so fast that he can pack so much bullshit into 5 minutes…
yep - it is much easier to preach bat shit crazy non sense, than it is to debunk it. Hence the uphill struggle of channels like this. However, KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK GUYS, YOU ARE DOING A HUGE SERVICE FOR HUMANITY. Although this is an old clip, still great work.
@@rianmacdonald9454 yes sir
Holy crap! That was a quick conversion. It looks more like a parody of a apologist. If the book says so it must be true. He should meet mister banana Ray Comfort.
now there is an idea for a show - ray comfort(or kent hovind) and this guy. Can just see the back and forth between them them.
Always love Apostate Aladdin.
"That's incredible!" As in, without credit. Should not be believed.
Which is a legal term. Incredible is one word a lawyer, judge or police officer does not want said with their name.
It's very cringe listening to Muslim preacher saying Quran contains no scientific mistakes as an ex Muslim.
Can you tell me one?
@@sjey8665 mountains stablizie the earth
They don’t
@@walterhartwellwhite8022 what they don't?
@@walterhartwellwhite8022 I will look into it, Are you an Atheist?
Canadian anger is the best way to deal with him. British politeness isn't assertive enough..
No as a Canadian we are too polite; give me an Aussie as they have no time to be polite; might have to do with most things in Australia wanting to kill you.
I seen Paulogia get Canadian angry. Not pretty. But these apologists need to experience Floridian angry.
Canadian anger? You mean offering someone coffee, just not the good coffee?
@@rembrandt972ify Releasing their inner geese.
@@johngavin1175 being from Maine I prefer Maniac anger. Florida man anger appears to be a bit scatterbrained/unfocused...
James says "Incredible!" a few times, and I agree with him:
incredible: (adjective) impossible to believe.
I mean it's technically possible, if you have been indoctrinated during your pre-rational developmental stage.
Lmao!!
@@jeannedarc7533 incredible: adjective - containing no credit whatsoever
@@PourLeCorps That's taking it a bit too far lol
@@jeannedarc7533 first, it’s a joke. Second, it’s not taking it too far.
2:45 1: Cosmological argument: Been debunked for decades.
2+2=4 ← Reality
2+God+2=4 ← Their argument: In this equation, God=non-existent
eh, no time to go thru them all, TheSkepTick does a good job on his own. er, I mean with help from Apostate Aladdin.
Apostate Aladdin was pretty good. I like him.
Bottom line:
lots of words but no god.
Fail.
Wow, James is really chill for someone who apparently had his entire world view upended.
Yeah... really got to admit, if I was in James' shoes, I would have ruined this apologist's video by waiting silently until the end then saying; "ok, so... Where's all the evidence that all this is true, because you haven't actually given me any. At all."
The whole "peacebeuponhim" thing has always annoyed me. It is so unnecessary and distracts me from what they are trying to say.
He didn't do it every single time he said Muhammad, so I wonder how he decides when to say it and when not.
It’s because of this guy that I say ‘leaf be upon her’
@@TheSkepTick But you're still more consistent in your praise of Lisa, leaf be upon her, than he is of his Muhammad, or whoever.
it's like Theist tourettes...
I noticed that well, he does not say it always. I think he just forgets at times.
Does it make me overly petty that I'm really REALLY annoyed every damn time this man says "Peace be upon him?"
Leaf be upon her
No, it annoys the crap out of everyone. It is just ridiculous.
They have been indoctrinated (brainwashed) into saying it, it`s sad really. Its like a computer That`s been programmed to respond to certain words or fraises, with a preprogramed responds.
Imagine being a god that can hear everyone at the same time somehow.. And you keep hearing peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him peace be upon him.
I would just kms.. Oh wait you're a god, you can't. I guess you'll just suffer for eternity 😂
@@ciri151 "yes, yes, peace be upon me ... now shut it!" :D
You'd think that as fast as he talks he could actually present an argument, instead of briefly referring to some arguments.
Well I'm convinced, he has a pamphlet and you can't argue with a pamphlet.
The written Arabic language _itself_ was still evolving when the Quran was finally compiled. It didn't have diacritic marks yet for one thing, and without those, words could be read more than one way.
Strangely I have met people who affirm arabic and arabs as an ancient language and people of the middle east. It's so weird!
@@puraLusa Growing up, I was taught Arabic was a special language, almost magical. God, Adam, Eve, Satan and the angels spoke it. It's beyond weird.
@@min24434 well it beats the american taugh god speaking english 😂. Or in my catholic school latin 😂. Strangely all the deities speak the convinient language.
@@puraLusa Gods are always the people that invented them. They are identical to their worshippers.
@@min24434 not in all instances, the one true mighty god is very much real, it's the rainbow giraffe. U have been warned either submit to the rainbow or u won't get into forest paradise!
Edit: the spaghetti monster is also acceptable.
Watching a leaf plant itself on to Lisa (LBUH) makes me happy every time I see it.
My understanding is that it contains no contradictions because it contains a declaration that the passage later in the book. It always overrules the one before it .
So it changes from beginning to end but it's not technically a contradiction because it contains its own edits.
It's a weasel word claim.
That would be incredibly irrational, as the Quran is organized from longest surahs to shortest, not chronologically.
@@stefanlaskowski6660 by scribes... after the prophet/warlord's death, wonder if they had an agenda?
@@stefanlaskowski6660 Naskh and ayat (sixty-seconds-of-google university)
@@stefanlaskowski6660
Yep, it's incredibly irrational, but the OP is right - if two claims are contradicting each other the latter superseds the former although it's not necessarily chronological. It's ridiculous but official doctrine.
Even if the book had no contradictions, that wouldn't be a miracle. The campus book store is filled with books that don't contradict themselves. Go try to find any contradictions in a math book, or chemistry book, or philosophy book, etc. There's nothing miraculous about writing a book that doesn't contradict itself. That's what any competent writer tries to do.
I've never come across a big book that didn't at least have typos
It does read It lmao
@@SheikhN-bible-syndrome I mean typos aren't really contradictions
@@lorekeeper685 they show that it's made by a human which makes mistakes
This preacher couldn't convince me to wipe my bot after taking a dump.
It's obvious that lad, just humoured the street preacher. He didn't ask any questions to clarify what he was being told. He just stood there pretending to take it all in and nodded politely. That is something you do, when you are not convinced, but don't want to get into a long drawn-out argument. I bet he wished he had said " not today thank you" and just walked away. That is what I would have done. If by any small chance he was convinced, he must be extremely gullible. But I doubt it.
Well, I am convinced. It only took only 3 seconds of our Friendly Neighbourhood Street Preacher's charming inanity to prove the point. God is real. All Hail Baby Jeebus... What? This is a different god? OK then. All hail YAHWEH... What? Not him! All hail Elohim? Nope. All Hail El Nope. All Hail Yeshua? Emanuel?... What a load of crap.
All hail Zeus! Or Odin! Or Jupiter!
Oh, those are wrong too?
U are all wrong it's clearly all hail to Thor and its mighty hammer!
@@puraLusa By The Power of Grayskull, I hope you are right. The Hindus have something like 10,000,000 gods. I don't fancy debating over that lot.
If the Quran is a perfect book, then it can not be misunderstood. If it can not be misunderstood then why are there different sects of Islam? Surely a perfect book would make it obvious what the correct way to worship is, how leadership of the religion should be handled, etc.
What do you hope from a 7th century illiterate merchant that live in the desert.
It deffos seemed to me like a young man being polite and humouring the man until he went away. It did not come across as a conversion, which doesn't surprise me, as a fellow Brit myself.
Is there a competition between Christian and Muslim apologists to see who can tell the most lies that I'm unaware of?
I think so, or at least from my perspective there is, but not just limited to those, I have literally had every single religion try to convert me to their ''cause'' -0 even scientology , and as much as i go on about normal religion being crazy - scientology is some bat shit crazy acid trip.
Personally I think scientology was started as a bet. To see what is the most craziest, clearly made up BS that you can get people to believe, and in this day and age, if you can get people to believe that, you can understand how religion in general spreads, and then work to stop it. Or at least I hope that is the point, as scientology is some really F'd up BS, drugs can't even answer for for some of their stuff. Seriously how the hell anyone can seriously believe scientology is beyond me.
@@rianmacdonald9454 I live in Clearwater. I am intimately familiar with Scientology and its bad news all around.
You haven't given James enough credit for his responses of "incredible". He clearly thinks it's all literally incredible, but has been ambushed:)
I doubt if James is an atheist. He never responded to any of the outlandish claims presented to him.
So disappointing.
@@JamesRichardWiley He is being polite, if he is an Atheist. Not everything requires a fight. Sometimes a good ol fashion "smile and nod until they go away" is just fine
@@Jprimus yes he probably was calculating how could he get out of interacting with him fastest lol
Allah is not a neutral name, it’s a masculine name. In Arabic Allah is short for al-ilah which means the god, as oppose to al-ilahat the goddess
Why would a god , who doesn't have a " partner " , or indeed anyone he could co-habit with ,
have any use for a gender? And yet the god of Abraham is very much, masculine. Why ?
I'm curious if the whole allah comes from al-ilah is something that classical scolars were saying too because from my understanding it's something that has arise recently
@@michellebrown4903 that's a very old answer: the gods pantheon had the goddess of fertility above but with the arrival of herdsman warrying culture it took a secondary role exchanged by a mighty masculine force and its from this that a all knowing all powerful god emerges.
Still people don't make the connection for faith purposes: the claim is that god was first then politheism.
@@getreal3148 not something recent at all, maybe in the West, i’m from an arab-speaking country, it is common knowledge that Allah means al-ilah for both Christian Arabs and Muslim Arabs
I had a Christian preacher tell me that the Bible could not be imitated. 'E said three researchers in Ohio tried to write a book like the Bible, and they couldn't do it. I didn't bother to tell him that bad fantasy writers were doing it in a doddle.
Noisy Preacher there says that Islam is growing rapidly. 'E doesn't say that Islam long ago fractured into divisions, and seems to be fracturing further. (The Whirling Dervishes are the true faith, btw.)
Saying, "Peas be upon him" every time is exactly the kind of personal worship that Mohammed was trying to prevent. Killing people for drawing his image is done to prevent Mohammed-worship.
More likely, Mohammed mockery. Muslims go insane when cartoons of him are published.
I wonder if Islam is actually growing faster than in the past in general, or if it is other religions are growing slower or shrinking? I also wonder if prisons didn't make special allowances for Muslim dietary requirements, would Islam be growing as fast as it is?
Ceiling Cat bible, Lego bible, literally any of the at least three extant spin-offs of christianity... that preacher lived under a rock so big even his god couldn't lift it.
@Sabbath D'inverno I asked if Islam was actually growing faster or if it was an illusion due to other religions declining. Also, I'll point out that the claim was that Islam was the fastest growing RELIGION, not ideology. Non-religious is, by definition, not a religion.
@@EdwardHowton Yeah, he's the guy that made me decide to go to college after all. He sounded so knowledgeable, and was so smug and so mocking, but when we happened to play computer Jeopardy together he was profoundly ignorant. Just like the seminary student before him ...
Ray Comfort, Random Muslim and Teneriffe Hotell Entertainer - all demonically rolled up into this hot mess......
I'd love to meet this guy and have a discussion wearing my apostate t-shirt...lol
James was just trying to be polite 😂
If you ever think christian apologetics is the stupidest thing you've ever heard, take a moment to listen to the unsophisticated, childish apologetics of islam and you will truly know the depths to which stupid can sink.
The most shocking part of this guy's video is that a young man is wearing a Jaws shirt. Has he seen it? Impressed if so. But don't watch more than 1 and 2, my dude. Anything after that is just silly.
No
Jaws four was awesome
Fofl
Man, I miss that movie, Spielberg really has a way of directing movies...
This is the second time I've seen this. Now I realize Lisa the Rainbow Giraffe 🦒(leaf be upon her), is the Creator of the universe! Thanks, Skep Tick!
I think I saw Lisa, leaf be upon her, put that box of silver under your house. Then Bubba the Incandescent Weasel, Blessed be his Luminosity, helped me dig it up. It was a pleasant week in Vegas!
Sounds completely plausible.
Theist: "..Let me proof to you there is a God by giving Arguments!.."
Well then he already failed,.. cause Arguments are not Evidence.
I can make Arguments for Dragons that would sound logical.. and still dont proof if they exist or do not exist.
*facepalm*
Well to be fair, some things are beyond realm of hard, physical evidence, and have to be argued for.
Yet, I do not see conclusive arguments for god's existence, either.
@@missk1697
"..Well to be fair, some things are beyond realm of hard, physical evidence, and have to be argued for..."
And still should not be accepted when there is nothing that can be considered as a back-up for those Arguments and Claims.
And i would say that everybody should know already that some stuff is difficult to provide Evidence for,.. that is... why different People specialize and invest a lot of Years of their Life to study those Fields of Science and even then,.. a lot of them never find the back-up to what they actually wanted to provide them for.
At least it is not a fail when they discover something else on the way, but at least.. they should collect investigatable Data. :P
@@missk1697
Maybe but so far no one's ever found anything that in anyway suggests that anything at all exists beyond hard physical evidence. I don't mean to assert that philosophical materialism here, we dropped it for methodological materialism for good reason. No what I'm saying is that it is silly to assert some things are beyond hard physical evidence just because said evidence has yet to be found.
For example quantum physical phenomenon in predictive scientific modeling has sometimes only strong mathematical proof for it or indirect evidence but they're still not beyond hard physical evidence even if that evidence currently lies ahead of our scientific scope. Such as the hard evidence that were lacking for decades for Einsteins relativistic theory, such as black holes and such.
A similar example is Dark Matter. It was thought that it would remain without hard physical evidence but since 2018, its existence wasn't just directly confirmed but also directly observed as a genuine photo of a dark matter web between galaxies were taken. And it's as genuine as the black hole photo from the same year. It was taken by a group of scientists in Waterloo.
A unique camera with special equipment was used as Dark matter isn't visible directly to the naked eye. Bit their photo and their scientific readings still count as Hard physical evidence considering what was done and what it is.
I'll provide a link in a separate comment if someone asks for it. YT is iffy about accepting links..
Anyway I think my point here was made clear. Nothing is truly beyond hard evidence if it actually exists and if it is it most likely is something made up, I.e non-existant. Like many old human concepts tend to turn out, like dieties and ghosts. No evidence has turned up over ages and what evidence there ever were, were all explained away by science as time went on.
To make this post as complete as possible I'll also add this about evidence.
Per the traditional aphorism, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence", positive evidence of this kind is distinct from a lack of evidence or ignorance of that which should have been found already, had it existed, in this regard Irving Copi writes:
" _In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence as positive proof of its non-occurrence_ ."
- Copi, Introduction to Logic(1953), p. 95
Meaning that in cases of no evidence where thorough search and research have gone along time, the lack of evidence thus can be accepted as positive evidence of its lack of existence.
...
Sorry for the lengthy reply to all that read this far and thanks.
Have a good day or evening.)
@@guytheincognito4186 Perhaps when we deal with existence vs non existence, you may have a point, yet plenty of important things, such as ethics, are non-physical by definition.
For example, the trolley problem. You most likely know it, and if not, the Wikipedia has it covered pretty well.
You can basically take two approaches in that case;
-Absolutist (deontological)
-Utilitarian (consequentialist)
We don't really have any objective, scientific way to prove any of these 2 superior, unless we come with a presupposition ("murder is always bad" or "reducing the overall deathcount is the highest goal"), which is non-scientific by definition.
@@missk1697
Thanks but your objection is null and void as abstract objects doesn't change anything I said nor in anyway strengthen your point. And the point of the argument were "hard physical evidence" and unless you take a hard disengenious approach to semantics, then you'll agree that they're also not beyond hard physical evidence as any documentary and dictionary entry about them thus counts as hard physical evidence, such as the photo of the black hole and the photo of the literal Dark matter web. While we don't have hard physical examples of the subject matter directly as I'd love to see some choice someones attempt to hold a black hole, we still have hard physical evidence of it. Same with the abstract. A requirement of being available to hold is not a neccesary for having hard physical evidence of something.
Also I know what the trolly problem is and it's a fallacious mess but that's a can of worms for another day.
"they memorized the book and they can not even speak arabic", yes because they learned the noises needed for each bit, thats how I learned my German at school without knowing any actual german words!
But that's exactly what we germans are doing. Nothing but noises and pretending we understood each other.
@@kai_plays_khomus so i truely did ace high school German....
@@joperhop
Who knows - maybe you even trumped Goethe without knowing?
Have a great sunday and greetings from Berlin!
There are 3 major plays in my native language that are extremely easy to memories and used in basic theater class because of this easiness: does that makes them miraculous!
@@kai_plays_khomus
Das stimmt nicht wir Deutschen verstehen Deutsch
15:15 Miraculously memorized the Koran, has he?
in Arabic, yes
More of these pls. So entertaining lmao
One of the reasons I look up these videos. best comedy ever.
What does it mean for an Omnipotent all knowing all powerful being requiring other less educated lesser beings to spread the word about its existence? The conclusion fails from the premise.
i am so dissapointed...this never happens to me.
What do i have to do to be interviewed like that.
i have watched so many of your videos now that i could make him cry and convert to atheism in a matter of minutes
Well, just keep your eyes open:
After they hid during the height of the pandemic Jehova's Wittnesses are crawling out their holes again to convince people of god on noisy street corners all over the world.
Atheism is not a conversion as it isn't a faith. No one converts to atheism and pretty much religions are atheistic in relation to other religions: christian don't have faith in druidism so they are atheist in relation to druidism, they also atheistic to sanata dharma or budism. Not a conversion base just a statement of lack of faith or belief.
I don't know about converting him, but I would love to be apart of a street preachers drivel. The closest I've ever gotten, is when a couple of mormons tried to hand me a bom. I dropped my voice down to a satanic level and proclaimed, 'I don't think my dark lord would like that". Have no idea the look on their faces after that.
Made me laugh though. 😃
@@shelliecarlson7015 that sounds like something i would do as well, sounds fun
@@puraLusa you know what i mean, to them you convert...to us...you gain iq points
Hmmm, sounds as if Ray Comfort has a soul brother. If we can find their Jewish counterpart we will have the whole Abrahamic group covered!
Exactly what I thought lol ,the Islamic ray comfort or ray al bin comfort as he likes to be known 🤣
Except that there is nothing in Jewish doctrine that commands followers to convert others. On the contrary, originally, it was an inherited religion - you _couldn't_ convert to it since it was all about the bloodline of David (or so... don't remember the full details). Which was in part where the whole "don't marry outside your religion" came from.
@@Wolf-ln1ml You have no idea how happy I am to hear this!
Nah, we need a Mormon too to complete the group. They're even more bonkers than Muslims.
Jews don't proselytize, but I'd pay good money to watch this guy, Ray Comfort, a Mormon, and a Jehovah's Witness duke it out. It'd be hilarious!
It would be funny if the guy says "You're right, there IS a God! I've been SOOOOO blind, hail Azathoth!"
Anyway, I would be very surprised if you looked up this James guy and now he's going to the Mosque and praying 3 times a day...
Yeah, it would be funny - but you would never see it. "Delete that crap, and let's look for another person to bother."
A leaflet?
That's it? That's all I needed was one single leaflet?
Oh come on...you don't have the link to the leaflet? Damn you SkepTick...where's the leaflet? Or should it be LEAFLET...since it's obviously THE ONE!
Thank you for sharing this wonderful conversion story...I'm getting my plane ticket tonight and heading to mecca for my full conversion.
Oh thank you SkepTick!
I am amazed at that students patience. I would have just left.
Thanks! I always enjoy your content
Thanks for super great videos. Keep it up! Your buddy, Tod.
Really well done breakdown of the apologetics and talking points used by the gentleman giving dawah! Apostate Aladdin's part was also very well worded. Love the lil animation of him on the couch with his cat lol!
Somehow, these street preachers never find me.
I suppose that they'd call that a protective miracle.
I have in my possession The Book of Kevin. It is completely unchanged since the time it was first written. In fact, I have the original texts. The Book of Kevin is totally true. I know this because it says so in the very first paragraph. "The Book of Kevin is totally true." See?
The Book of Kevin tells us that the Cosmic Creator Cat is the One and Only True Creator. It's true because the Book is true. Other proofs are the amazing miracles done by the Cosmic Creator Cat attested to in the Book. As the One, True Prophet of the Cosmic Creator Cat, I also have proofs of amazing and completely fulfilled prophecies. The Book contains the prophecies, then shows their fulfillment. Exactly as spoken. Nothing about the Book contradicts anything in current science. In fact, it makes amazing references to things like the lunar landings and the Higgs boson. Impressive, huh? None of the other supposedly holy books can say that. Anyone who wants to waste a buttload of time memorizing the Book can do so. It has no contradictions. Any historical events mentioned are from reputable, historical sources so are as true as can be determined.
Thus proving the existence of the Cosmic Creator Cat.
But the Cosmic Creator Cat has absolutely no interest in being worshipped. Especially by humans. They're only good as servants for cats.
And...no....James was not converted. He was just being polite in front of the camera.
Wow that's very convincing but I'm abit on the fence whether to convert from the book of Eric. Courtesy of Eric Murphy, host on Talk Heathen. 😁😉
Did you plagiarize that from the book of Eric?
The Book of Eric is totally different. Different content. Different everything. Even a different cover. One can accept both books and lead a happy, fulfilled life. Or accept neither, since neither one really has any lasting consequences.
Great job on TW. I really like Apostate Alladin's approach & content .
Thanks KCA!
It’s so nice that our Mohammedan friends have retrofitted the patented (Duane) Gish Gallop™️ for Islam ! The universal dishonesty of apologists everywhere is ultimately a point of unification for multiple faiths. Praise 🐝 🍃 !
After seeing you on Truth Wanted, I can't hear your voice without seeing your face. And I can't see your face without thinking of your over the top facial expressions. British people are certainly the peak of human civilization.
Thank you!
Love ur vids
"Only 27% of Brits are religious". That got me wondering about here in Australia. I didn't want to dig too deep in but googled "what percentage of Australians are christians" and "what percentage of Australians believe in god" and got this for the former " the proportion of Australians who describe themselves as having no religion has risen from 26.0% in 2003 to 45.5% in 2020" and this for the latter " Not only does most of Australia identify with Christianity, but more than half (55%) of the population believes in God, as defined as the Creator of the universe, the Supreme Being." Which is a tad confusing when it starts with "most Australians identify with christianity" THEN "(55%) of the population believes in God" which sounds odd since I would think a lot more believe in god than would consider themselves as christians but, statistics, they often give strange results.
I think I need to move to England 🤦🏻♀️! I'm glad to see the percentage has dropped drastically from 26% not believing in god in 2003 to 45.5% in 2020 but 55% still believing in fairy tales is rather depressing to me, I thought we had more sense than that 😒.
Good on you Brits though, showing some sense across the pond there.
We/they still use it in too much monarchistic ceremony for my liking.
Not sure where your figures came from, however the latest census data for Australia in regards to religion can be found here: www.abs.gov.au/articles/religious-affiliation-australia
@@someone6170 Thanks BUT, your own source shows "Almost 10 million Australians reported having no religion.". That's out of 25.6 million so not too far off.
I did exactly what I said, and stated the search terms so you DO know where I got my figures. As I also said, I didn't dig deep because I couldn't be bothered, simple as that.
@@TheSkepTick Agreed, here too. They use way too much "traditional" stuff thrown into all sorts of ceremonial things. Most of it people can't relate to because it's all related to something completely irrelevant these days and very outdated but, "they used to in the old days so we've got to do it now too" whether anyone even knows the history of it or cares, "it's how we do it" etc etc, and everyone wastes their time regardless.
@@lorditsprobingtime6668 , all good, like you said there or there abouts. 🙂
Keep up the good work
Oooo so glad to have another channel to watch 😁
6:12 "James...is your name shortened to Jim or something?" Wut?! 🤣🤣
Does the apologist know the meaning of the the word incredible?
The fine tuning argument doesn’t make sense. Why would god need to “fine tune” our universe for life? I thought he supposedly create the universe so why is he having to work within its constraints? He should be able to do and place anything anywhere he wants
7:40 it always been like that 😂
For me it's
1. Pick A verse, Re Interpret it to match the science
2. Pick scientific theory, Oversimplified it to match the verse
3. Said that this knowledge only exist after the Quran 😂
There is another recent video of this guy, supposedly proving God to a non-believer. It is in exactly the same place and the conversation is virtually word for word the same. Total BS.
That hajji is so far off the mark he couldn't punch water if he fell in the ocean.
It's true because BOOOOOOOK!!!
GAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWDDD
It’s a good book, don’t ya know?
I have very little patience for apologists of any stripe and this guy is getting on my nerves as I try to watch the whole video. This preacher’s nonsense would not last two minutes if he cared to talk to a woman like me.
One miracle of a book worth memorising is "Jonathan Segal Chicken" by Howard Albrecht and Sol Weinstein. Very inspirational.
It took me a while to figure out the interaction but here's what's happening: The preacher is talking like a telemarketer, but he's failing at it, because his mark is listening to him like a patient and kind (but streetwise) man listens to the tragic tale of a beggar.
I just love the "leaf be upon her"... 🤣
T-shirt with that coming VERY soon
@@TheSkepTick That’s going to do great!
Apostate Alladin was here !!
My parents, both Anglican, did not have me baptised because they wanted me to make my own decision. By the time II was old enough to make those kinds of decision, I no longer believed. So, although I did attend the church for many years, I never took communion.
Many years ago I had a salesman try to sell me a Kirby vacuum cleaner. He was exactly as fast and eager as this guy. His hard sell failed, however, because he became so annoying and frustrating to deal with. He told me that one clean with his vacuum cleaner was the same as using a regular one for six months solid. So, I told him to contact me in half a year. This guy is cut from the same cloth.
awkwardly the book was changed roughly 2 weeks after as it was pretty much fully destroyed and rewritten by others who wher not muhammad.
so it's a straight up lie to say it's unchanged. besides all the times it has been changed.
Well I can show the Muslim guy in one minute there are no sky magician by showing the amazing images from the new James Webb telescope that shows no sky magicians in the images .
Second hand car sales men at least try to sell you a lemon that's real, unlike these "fast food" style street preachers.
Muslim apologists keep forgetting that the quran is the claim and not the evidence. Saying “X couldn’t have possibly known this, therefore god!” Is not an answer nor an explanation.
It just shows some people want to keep believing their fairytale and not put in the work for actual answers.
These on the street preachers creep me out. It's like David Brent, you feel embarrassed for the poor guy stood there squirming.
You deserve more subscribers ❤️😘
I appreciate that, Anica!
I'd be HARD pressed not to say "a turd be inside his mouth", everytime he gets his verbal tick.
Islamists are at least a hundred years behind in their apologetics.
they still think by now to us ancient and boring arguments are mind blowing.
So... Does someone want to tell the nameless street preacher that he debunked one is his own points?
4) (11:30) The Qur'an is "Easy to Memorise - Millions of Muslims have Memorised It (I'm assuming he includes himself considering it would seem kind of silly or wrong if he didn't have it memorized himself)
At the 15:02 mark of the video he fumbles, misses words and the like. Now, maybe I'm being overly critical. English doesn't appear to be his first language, which is completely fair, and maybe he's only really used to quoting from memory in Arabic but I feel like if you're making a point about how it's so easy to learn and you plan to go try and convert people in a country that doesn't speak Arabic that it kind of ruins your point if it is only easy to memorize in Arabic when it's a text that has gone all around the world in however many different languages.
Even funnier...one of the verses in that book is used to determine if someone is drunk...because it is so complicated to memorize. 🤪
If you suspect someone of being drunk, that is forbidden according to the qu'ran, you ask him to recite that verse. If he gets it out flawless he is deemed sober, as it is deemed impossible to recite it correctly if drunk.
Another fun fact...most non arabic speaking muslims and a big chunk of arabic speaking muslims can't recite it correctly even if sober...because it is incredible difficult to memorize.🤷♂️😏
Quoting David Mitchell: "Yes, incredible. As in 'not credible'."
People who speak fast have nothing to say
Well, it's more that they're trying to... well, fast-talk someone _into_ agreeing with them, instead of actually convincing anyone with good arguments that can hold up to... oh, a couple of seconds of thinking...
People like Ben Shapiro come to mind.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Thanks!
I want that Jaws hoodie
Quite nice, o' chap!
It was great having dinner with you but these theists you respond to make my head hurt 🤪🤪
Ah yes let’s grab some random kid in between his classes, Gish-gallop him with 1,000 points in 2 seconds and then claim we proved god is real. The kid had absolutely no chance to but in a debunk anything the guy said.
I came across this video through Apostate Aladdin's channel. I enjoyed watching this video. Love from an ExMuslim ❤️
I love AA
@11:32 "Millions of people have memorized it by heart and they can't speak Arabic!"
So what you're admitting there is millions of people can't honestly say they understand a word it says? They've just memorized the noises and chanting but they don't understand it?
Yes! That's a thing that bothers me a lot! Everyone reads the Quran, but no one reads it with understanding
And there is sayins like "if you study religion too much you go insane"
As if they know people will stop believing in it
You can't prove something that doesn't exist.
Exactly 💯
Them there be dragons
@@agimasoschandir
Lol
Yup. You can't prove that there's a universe and life that exists without a god.
"Street Preacher Proves God And Converts Atheist?"
No, you see, what happened there is that he made a complete idiot of himself, like they all do.
Every time the guy says "that's incredible" he actually means incredible. As in "I don't believe that for a second". It's so funny how these apologists put these videos up being all proud they converted someone, while it's blatantly obvious their victim is just humoring the looney.
I'm told sarcasm is the number 1 British export and I'm here for it! This was a pretty weak attempt at persuasion for anything much less a god