DxO PureRaw 3 Tutorial - Complete Walkthrough & Tips for Beginners ep.452
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
- Your support and donations are greatly appreciated!
RobTrek.com/do...
RobTrek.com/co...
*DXO Free Trials # ad:
robtrek.com/dxo
Olympus E-Group: www.e-group.uk...
MU-43.com Forum: www.mu-43.com/...
My Amazon Store # ad*:
www.amazon.com...
My eBay Link # ad*:
ebay.to/2DuHOt8
Social:
Instagram: / robtreklens
Facebook: / robtreklens
My Blog: robtrek.com
*We are a participant in the eBay and Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Ebay.com Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
#omsystem #robtrek #photography
This is the best Pure RAW video I have seen. Great job!
Wow, thank you!
Presumably if you need to process a panoramic image you need to process the files before they are stitched and presumably this will substantially increased processing time when it comes to stitching them in, say, Lightroom
With the ISO performance and IBIS of my Panasonic S5 plus the noise reduction performance of Dxo Pure Raw 3, i don't need anymore fast lenses: with just the 20-60 and 70-300 i am fully covered for any situation in any light. This camera and this software have been a real game changer for my photography.
I also have the S5. Images are sublime!
Hi Rob, Thanks for the video. Just bought PR3 on the recommendations of Rod Lawtons Life after Photoshop article. Works brilliantly on my 2017 Apple processing Fuji files though Capture One pro. Like your style of presentation.- not too fast or laborious.
A deal breaker for me is the file size of the raw it creates and re-imports back to lightroom... about five times the original Mb.
I get that. I typically delete the raw files after conversions. I make exceptions time to time, but generally don't need to keep them.
Exporting to TIFF creates **much much larger** files than exporting to DNG. Lightroom can handle DNG directly.
Very helpful video.
Glad it was helpful!
Very useful. Thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
Great job!
Thank you! Cheers!
Thank you for this extremely helpful tutorial. I currently use PhotoMechanic for culling. Am I able to open my tagged/selected images directly in DXO Pure Raw 3 prior to creating a Lightroom Catalogue. Any workflow suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Not that I am aware of. I'm using Photolab 7 Elite which has Deep Prime built in, so haven't used Pure Raw in a while. Maybe double check with the dxo forum forum.dxo.com/
Thanks for your reply Rob.
Really enjoyed this video Rob, thanks.
I hope you don't mind a few questions:
1. When you process so many files in this way are the resulting files huge? How do you manage your files so the storage is manageable?
2. If you process files in the way you suggest, including chromatic aberration, lens distortion and vignetting, does this cause any conflicts if you edit later in Lightroom? So will Lightroom try to execute the built in lens corrections again during that editing process? Would you normally switch this off in Lightroom as a result?
3. If you do it the other way around i.e. Edit in Lightroom first and then e port from Lightroom to DXO through the plug in, will DXO remember your edits so that the image in DXO will appear as your edited copy, not the original RAW?
Hope that makes sense. Thanks again for the content and the referrals to the other M43 groups.
Hi Brian,
1. I usually delete the raw files after processing in DxO. The files created by DxO are 3-5 times larger, so storage is at a premium. It's best to be very selective on which files you process. I wouldn't just batch process an entire directory or day's shoot.
2. If you process lens corrections in DxO, then make sure to uncheck the optical corrections when editing the processed file in Lightroom. Otherwise you'll be applying optical corrections twice, giving a distorted image.
3. DxO only processes the untouched raw images. Edits done in lightroom prior to DxO are ignored.
Hope that helps,
-Rob
Great video, have you been able to compare this to the newer Lightroom denoise option?
Thanks. Yes, I did a few comparisons. At lower iso they are pretty much the same. At higher iso, DxO clearly does a better job. It really depends on the image, but generally over 6400 will be better in DxO.
Thank you for this excellent tutorial. Is there a time of the year that we can actually get a discounted version of DXO Raw? Also, another concern is the support of future cameras/lenses. While it is being promoted as a lifetime one-time purchase, once Raw 4 is out, Raw 3 will no longer be supported with new cameras/lenses. From my understanding, this means that you no longer can open the files generated from future cameras.
Black Friday deals in October are the best. As for camera updates, it's probably best to wait until you see the camera you want supported. You never know when a new version is about to release and you don't want to buy Raw 3 and then have to pay an upgrade to Raw 4. The upgrades are substantially less expensive than a full version, but sill. That would not be ideal..
@@RobTrek Thank you for your reply. Would love to see a comparison video of noise reduction between DXO, Topaz and lightroom. I know there are already a few videos on this but would love to hear your take.
I guess if you're using Lightroom one would have to deactivate the auto sharpening, chromatic aberation processes, etc in Lightroom before processing it in PureRaw.
Hi. Sorry I took so long to get back to you. PureRaw will ignore Lightroom settings and use the original raw file. So no need to do anything first. It will create a new dng file for you to edit. Do not apply optical corrections to the created dng file.
I have a Pentium 486 running at 33mhz with 16mb ram and Hercules graphics. Will this program work for me?
Unfortunately not. From there website: The computer needs at least 4 GB of RAM and 4 GB of available hard disk space. GPU compatibility starts from NVIDIA GeForce 8 Series, ATI Radeon HD2000 Series, and Intel HD Graphics 2000 Series or Apple silicon. Windows machines need an Intel Core 2 or AMD Athlon 64 X2 or higher.
Sorry, it was meant as a joke. I don't imagine any photographer is editing images on a 1996 computer.
@@michaeltuffin8147 No worries. I should have realized you were kidding as the details were so specific. I still have an issue of PC Mag from the 90's that I like to thumb through. It's next to my JC Whitney Catalog!
@@RobTrek I used to have a vast library of photography mags from the 80s and 90s, but, alas, they were lost in a house fire.
@@RobTrek I never had a JC Whitney Catalog but I did a few voluminous Sears Catalogues that weighed as much as several bricks.
Im trying to use the demo but it won't allow me to open any files, has anyone had this issue and do you know how to fix it?
Hi. I'm not able to answer this question. I recommend asking the dxo forum here: forum.dxo.com/