UNDEFEATED WITH STICKER GOBLIN! Turbo Muxus _____ Goblin Aggro (Legacy Goblins MTG)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 138

  • @TriforceCollector
    @TriforceCollector Рік тому +138

    So excited to see Mind Goblin get some action!

    • @JohnFromAccounting
      @JohnFromAccounting Рік тому +19

      Mind Goblin is more confusing in paper.

    • @TriforceCollector
      @TriforceCollector Рік тому +15

      @@JohnFromAccounting It's interesting seeing how the different Mtgo version is playing out. In paper you at least know the value of your mind goblin before you cast it as your sticker sheets are known.

    • @mikeames138
      @mikeames138 Рік тому +4

      Ive been working on a Mind Goblin/squirrel deck

    • @jfb-
      @jfb- Рік тому +5

      @@TriforceCollector on the other hand, the second mind goblin in paper is a bit less effective as you've already used up your best sticker; whereas in mtgo it's still always going to be mana positive

    • @assault410
      @assault410 Рік тому +15

      Mind goblin these nuts

  • @Melissanoma
    @Melissanoma Рік тому +11

    "Well, I think this one qualifies and I hope you do too". confirmed. as soon as I saw the thumbnail I knew this would be it.
    edit: and game "1" you do the thing!

  • @mamathana
    @mamathana Рік тому +11

    I played a lot of Historic combo goblins back when Muxus was new. The most powerful part of that deck was secretly being a good aggro deck that just happened to have a T3-T4 combo kill. This deck feels the same. Excellent vid 🎉

  • @lancergt1000
    @lancergt1000 Рік тому +23

    damn, the Name Sticker Goblin didn't sugarcoat it

  • @JohnFromAccounting
    @JohnFromAccounting Рік тому +46

    I really want Goblins to become a staple of the meta.

  • @dBradbury
    @dBradbury Рік тому +17

    I think in general, Phil from the Future is my favorite recurring character on this show.

  • @rookermtg9321
    @rookermtg9321 Рік тому +35

    Battle Cry Goblin such an underrated card. I love that little mana sink

    • @Dhips.
      @Dhips. Рік тому +2

      It's won me many games in both commander and arena.

  • @GeoQuag
    @GeoQuag Рік тому +7

    For about 12:00, submerge requires your opponent (you in this case) to control a forest for it to be a free cast, so not something to worry about there. Hard to remember that when the primary use case is to kill the uncountable and indestructible marit lage token, a card usually played in decks with forests.

  • @anonzillaking
    @anonzillaking Рік тому +3

    Jim davis taught me alot about gobo decks. this deck runs really well because it has two "combo' wins built into the main plan with those combos just being the main plan as well. sticker goblin feels like the second prospector allowing you to really utilize just how much your goblins will draw it almost feels like elves but better because your pieces do the drawing without any additional help from cards like glimpse

  • @ReyaadawnMTG
    @ReyaadawnMTG Рік тому +9

    ___ Goblin is the 2nd or 3rd best ritual ever printed but nobody wanted to deal with the sticker nonsense to get there

  • @eirh
    @eirh Рік тому +25

    Battlecry Goblin is one of these cards that I always get surprised when I see it's an uncommon. It does so much so efficiently. I guess it could get away with the uncommon rarity in draft due to not too much goblin synergy in the set, but it still ended up being one of the best cards of that format.

    • @SoulsOnly
      @SoulsOnly Рік тому +1

      yeah, card was disgusting in that draft format

    • @zoninkspl6597
      @zoninkspl6597 Рік тому

      Battlecry goblin was like the mythic uncommon of the format and probably top 5 card in the set in limited. It's so innocuous but it's legit just a legacy powerlevel card somehow

  • @BjornarUrang
    @BjornarUrang Рік тому +4

    I'm very excited to see mind goblin on mtgo! And very happy you showcased it.
    I also believe you lucksacked this league, drawing skirk prospector in all of your opening hands :) I've been playing this in paper since november, and would recommend playing goblin lackeys and a slightly reduced number of fast mana. Your land count is also a bit high. Playing mind goblin turn one is not necessary. Turn two is just fine, and with fewer mana sources, I actually think the deck becomes more stable. It will topdeck better if your key cards get dealt with and the game drags out.
    I've been tuning this for almost a year now. Consider this:
    5 Mountain
    3 Shatterskull Smashing
    4 Cavern of Souls
    4 Ancient Tomb
    3 City of Traitors
    3 Chrome Mox
    2 Simian Spirit Guide
    4 Goblin Lackey
    4 Skirk Prospector
    3 Rundvelt Hordemaster
    1 Mogg War Marshall
    2 Battle Cry Goblin
    4 Goblin Matron
    3 Goblin Warchief
    4 _____ Goblin
    2 Pashalik Mons
    3 Goblin Ringleader
    4 Muxus
    2 Fury
    Sideboard:
    4 Leyline of the Void
    2 Chalice of the void
    2 Red Elemental Blast
    1 Goblin Trashmaster
    2 Fury
    1 Blood Moon
    1 Magus of the Moon
    1 Surgical Extraction
    1 Dead // Gone

  • @alexmaragh7766
    @alexmaragh7766 Рік тому +11

    The fact that in my head it’s mind goblin shows my immaturity

  • @GlichCentral
    @GlichCentral Рік тому +2

    On a side note, the picture you used from scryfall at the beginning there is the scan of the weird foil treatment. There’s also a scan of the non-foil version available, but for some reason the name-sticker goblin page links to the weird foil page instead

  • @Petronio39
    @Petronio39 Рік тому +1

    I love seeing battlecry goblin do stuff because I looked at that card and was immediately like, "Ohh damn, this card is the nuts, and will be like 25c." I love it when really budget cards can pull a ton of weight, and goblins is the posterchild archetype for that.

  • @simpsonzack22
    @simpsonzack22 Рік тому +11

    Ok, I really wanna bring this deck to a legacy tournament.

    • @nicholasfarrell5981
      @nicholasfarrell5981 Рік тому

      Do it.

    • @bladeflesh
      @bladeflesh Рік тому

      I’m assuming you would have to bring a sticker deck instead of just rolling a die

    • @The-Nomad1
      @The-Nomad1 Рік тому +2

      @@bladeflesh to be fair that's just googling what an optimal sticker deck looks like, then you get to deal the mental damage to your opps at the beginning of every match when you present the sticker deck

  • @CharlotteMimic
    @CharlotteMimic Рік тому +8

    Battle Cry Goblin was NASTY in limited. Excited to see it do work in Legacy LOL
    Notable difference between MTGO and paper: in paper you both know ahead of time how much mana NSG can make.

    • @ThrabenUniversity
      @ThrabenUniversity  Рік тому +2

      I expected to think that card was mid, and I was WRONG.

    • @Geroaergaroe
      @Geroaergaroe Рік тому +6

      ​@@ThrabenUniversity
      Fun fact : even Goblin player thought it was mid.
      Then Bowmaster kicked the traditional hordemaster in the proverbial nuts and they rediscovered BCG. With Mind Goblin right after.

    • @kyleucf
      @kyleucf Рік тому

      How does it work in paper? I can’t seem to figure it out.

    • @GeoQuag
      @GeoQuag Рік тому +2

      @@kyleucf you pick your 3 random sticker cards at the beginning of the game but you get to pick the stickers that go on your goblin, so you know exactly how many times you will get 6, 5, or 4 mana and can control when each happens.

    • @jfb-
      @jfb- Рік тому +2

      @@kyleucf you bring a sticker deck of at least 10 stickers, and at the start of each game you randomly select 3 of them and those will be accissible to use durign the game. there'a an optimal list of 10 stickers that no matter which group of 3 you get garuntees at least 1 sticker makes at least 4 mana.

  • @countOfHenneberg
    @countOfHenneberg Рік тому +5

    That laugh at the end of the first game...

  • @Eisenwulf666
    @Eisenwulf666 Рік тому +4

    "Looks like Goblin is back on the menu bois!"

  • @twidgetron328
    @twidgetron328 Рік тому +4

    Seems like Goblin Warchief could be one of the goblins to cut/sideboard out. The double R at 3 mana hurts since you can't turn 2 it off of a sol land, and its effect is really on relevant on Muxus turns if you manage to rip it.

  • @usagi2988
    @usagi2988 Рік тому +3

    Love seeing Goblins do their thing!

  • @Zauzzie
    @Zauzzie Рік тому +1

    @12:00 you could have played around removal by playing the battlefield goblin and saving 1 more gobbo for mana giving everything +1+0 and haste and still got the kill.

  • @Korwinga
    @Korwinga Рік тому +2

    It's cool to see goblins shift from the controlly classic legacy goblins to more of a stompy build. Very neat.

    • @RiKSh4w
      @RiKSh4w Рік тому +1

      Is it stompy? Between this and historic it's more of a really stupid combo deck. You just reach 6 mana, play Muxus and spew unbelievable value onto the field. And if you jump through all the combo-hate hoops to disable Muxus then it's a weak tribal deck that will beat you before you can stop the combo THEN pivot into beating a fair beatdown.

  • @SpeedOfRound
    @SpeedOfRound Рік тому +5

    Round 1 game 2, opponent could have bolted the sticker goblin to stop the chain since the ability requires the card exist when it resolved? Brewers advantage.

  • @54321eclipse12345
    @54321eclipse12345 Рік тому +1

    A creature that turns 3 mana into 4? Initiative entered the chat.

  • @krazyesko
    @krazyesko Рік тому

    Hi sir, yes it was tonyscapone deck very hard to pilot. Thanks to you also to always be kind with whatever players your face. I was listening to your channel since years. Very happy to be facing you. What not this happy for the deck choice. But I did drawn well for the 2 games but I should mul the game 3 - see you around

  • @Dhips.
    @Dhips. Рік тому

    Big fan of goblins, what a joy to see you play them. I'd add another Battle Cry Goblin though.

  • @koytru
    @koytru Рік тому +6

    Hey Mr. University, I think it'd be cool if you could speed up an uneventful or "unsatisfying" match to like 10x speed instead of just not including it, maybe talking over it or explaining why you didnt want to include it. I've seen other mtg youtubers do that for their uneventful matches and it goes pretty well.

    • @Zauzzie
      @Zauzzie Рік тому

      I think hes match one opponent didnt play or do anything(maybe connection issues?), which is reasonable to skip the match.

    • @koytru
      @koytru Рік тому +2

      @@Zauzzie ohhhhh I thought maybe it was the case that his opponent did very little, if they did absolutely nothing then yeah nevermind

  • @Korwinga
    @Korwinga Рік тому +4

    It's definitely cool to get the name sticker goblin into MTGO, but it's unfortunate that you can't see what you're going to get from it the way that you can in paper. This is seen fairly clearly just the first game. In paper, you would know if one of your 3 available sticker sheets had Guacamole. If it did, you could have went for turn 1 Muxis deterministically. Having it be random means the deck has to go a little bit more slower than it otherwise might, even if the randomness does mean that you can high roll two 6 mana goblins in a single game. A higher ceiling, but at the cost of randomness.

  • @shaunbarber2325
    @shaunbarber2325 Рік тому +7

    ... did MtGO just do alchemy?

    • @2007Shockwave
      @2007Shockwave Рік тому +1

      Looks like it. And on top of things powered up a card...

    • @christianroot6287
      @christianroot6287 Рік тому

      this is how the card works afaik, its just weirder to implement

    • @benjaminsouthworth5698
      @benjaminsouthworth5698 Рік тому

      @@2007Shockwavetbf I’m fairly sure the Mtgo version is worse, from what I’ve seen the average mind goblin in paper can make ~5 mana consistently in paper and it’s really important to always know how much mana you’re making when you’re planning out lines like sometimes with this version you’ll play out a mind goblin in the hope it makes x mana and roll low and be like Welp, guess my hand doesn’t work anymore

  • @ryankane8836
    @ryankane8836 Рік тому

    Goblins is my main legacy deck, excited to try this out

  • @derekhall8453
    @derekhall8453 Рік тому +2

    I hate that they made a sticker mechanic outside of an Un-Set

  • @Chillax_Bro1
    @Chillax_Bro1 Рік тому

    Battle cry goblin is copies 9-12 of goblin bushwhacker in my old super budget 12 wack modern deck and it was really fun

  • @spyderman312
    @spyderman312 Рік тому

    11:30 the second matron should get another Sticker. Then you get to play it and battle cry goblin for the big swing.

  • @wiiblewobble
    @wiiblewobble Рік тому

    You can use stickers on modo???? :0

  • @kingofredlions8729
    @kingofredlions8729 Рік тому

    This seems like the type of deck I would like to build for paper, how do the sticker decks work IRL? What are the 10 sticker sheets that I would want for this deck?

    • @gwendettax
      @gwendettax Рік тому +1

      not sure how the mechanic actually works irl, but the "delusionary" sticker gives you 6 mana off the goblin every time

    • @whit4446
      @whit4446 Рік тому

      your opponent randomly gets to pick the 3 stickers out of the 10 stickers

    • @BjornarUrang
      @BjornarUrang Рік тому +2

      You need the ten sticker sheets with highest numbers of distinct wowels printed out and sleeved. The way I do it is I show my opponent the sticker sheets before we draw opening hands, for them to confirm the sheets are all unique. I then shuffle them and fan them open, and the opponent picks three. This has to be repeated for games two and three. It is reasonably random and quick. I've also put tiny bits of paper with numbers on them inside the sleeves, to keep track of which name stickers have been spent. There have been few questions and no complaints.

    • @kingofredlions8729
      @kingofredlions8729 Рік тому

      @@BjornarUrang Right my question is what are the 10 sheets with the most unique vowels in the names

    • @BjornarUrang
      @BjornarUrang Рік тому +2

      @@kingofredlions8729 The sheets are numbered, and you´d want these numbers: 1:Guacamole(4) 5:Misunderstood(4) 12:Narrow-Minded(4 ) ,Baloney(4) 13:Unsanctioned(5) 18:Phyrexian(4) 23:Minotaur(4) 30:Delusionary(6 ) 36:Gelatinous(5 ) 45 : Dinosaur ( 4 )

  • @simonteesdale9752
    @simonteesdale9752 Рік тому

    There's also a secret 4th Worldgorger combo piece that makes you deal with stickers.
    Last Voyage of the _____.

  • @themaddollmaker
    @themaddollmaker Рік тому

    So in paper, does "_____" goblin have different mana production outcomes in different languages?

    • @ThrabenUniversity
      @ThrabenUniversity  Рік тому

      I believe that the stickers are only in English.

    • @themaddollmaker
      @themaddollmaker Рік тому

      @@ThrabenUniversity thought that might have been the case and disappointed with wotc for making a mechanic that can't translate to international players. Fell out of magic and sold my collection but still love watching your content

  • @1asdsa1
    @1asdsa1 Рік тому

    39:00 could activiate 2nd time after the 1/1 was made, though didn't matter.

  • @teddythodo3302
    @teddythodo3302 Рік тому

    I just realized your name is Phil Gallagher like Phillip Gallagher from shameless 😂

  • @steveheist6426
    @steveheist6426 Рік тому

    I honestly think the upside of *having* the occasional "oops I Muxus'd T1" and the "heh here's a 5/2 Name Sticker Goblin and a 4/1 Battle-Cry Goblin" together makes NSG worth playing.

    • @PVDH_magic
      @PVDH_magic Рік тому

      NSG?

    • @steveheist6426
      @steveheist6426 Рік тому +1

      @@PVDH_magic I didn't realize spelling out Name Sticker Goblin and then abbreviating Name Sticker Goblin as NGS (for Name Sticker Goblin, sometimes abbreviated as NGS) would cause issues understanding that NGS was abbreviating Name Sticker Goblin, or that Name Sticker Goblin can be abbreviated as NGS.
      This far-too-sarcastic-response brought by reading comprehension through interpreting the whole sentence as a unit.
      Also I stole NGS as an abbreviation elsewhere in the comments so I thought it was commonplace. Such is life.

    • @PVDH_magic
      @PVDH_magic Рік тому

      Haha no problem, I just haven't come across that yet and couldn't figure it out looking over the decklist@@steveheist6426
      It probably doesn't help that almost exclusively see that card called Mind Goblin :p

  • @42sporks5
    @42sporks5 Рік тому

    Love live the muxus king!

  • @bryankopkin6869
    @bryankopkin6869 Рік тому

    “Whats mind goblin?” 😈

  • @IeuroI
    @IeuroI Рік тому

    "that was fast" - thats what she said 😏

  • @Reversespacehippie
    @Reversespacehippie Рік тому

    Obligatory algorithmic contribution

  • @Rumpelstilzchen12
    @Rumpelstilzchen12 Рік тому

    Why does it say 9 or fewer NSG?

    • @ThrabenUniversity
      @ThrabenUniversity  Рік тому +1

      In an attempt to make it more similar to the physical sticker experience. You can run out of stickers in paper.

    • @Rumpelstilzchen12
      @Rumpelstilzchen12 Рік тому

      @@ThrabenUniversity Oh got it, thank you!

  • @JohnnyDeLeo1
    @JohnnyDeLeo1 Рік тому +2

    First! Because I was looking for something to distract me at work.

  • @mefagar
    @mefagar Рік тому

    But what about Round 1 ? O.o

  • @robnotwicz7002
    @robnotwicz7002 Рік тому +1

    Amazing

  • @odoylerules1435
    @odoylerules1435 Рік тому +1

    You think you could play 1-2 krenko mobb boss in the main, its close to infinite mana with skirk prospector and can get haste off warcheif if u got it out. Id take out 2 war marshal for it.

    • @ThrabenUniversity
      @ThrabenUniversity  Рік тому +4

      I don't think War Marshal got the best showing this league. I never "lived the dream" of it being 3 mana with Skirk. That said, Krenko is legit.

    • @selkokieli843
      @selkokieli843 Рік тому

      Put Krenko in the command zone and it's actually infinite 😁

  • @felipelandi1766
    @felipelandi1766 Рік тому

    I play with blanck goblin in duel commander (is commander but 1v1 with a unique banlist) and i think this version is even more powerfull that in paper, buy it has a very important problem in paper you and your opponent always know how much mana it will add for the stickers you reveal, in here you can't know if it will add 6 and let you cast muxxuz or leave you with four and you have no to cast with that, this can affecr mulligans, if you know it will add 6 and you have it wity muxxuz in your starting hans that is an instant keep if it would add 4 maybe not, here you have to risk it, that say i know is a weird mechanic and this kinda does the job but is sad that paper magic and online magic aren't the same with this card

  • @juancruzblasco9477
    @juancruzblasco9477 Рік тому +6

    Goblins being playable again thanks to a joke card is oddly fitting

  • @charlesfuller7774
    @charlesfuller7774 Рік тому +1

    Ahh. The goblin nuts jokes are now on mtggo. Nice

  • @cantorofleng7837
    @cantorofleng7837 Рік тому

    I remember trying a similar concept in vintage years ago. It's a shame that muxus is a really bad backup there.

  • @RumpledNutskin
    @RumpledNutskin Рік тому

    You know Phill will 5-0 a league when he plays a chrome mox, ancient tomb, SSG deck

  • @Derpmind
    @Derpmind Рік тому

    Goblin Deck Wins?

  • @CoilingSliver
    @CoilingSliver Рік тому +1

    I won't mind goblin down this video.

  • @1asdsa1
    @1asdsa1 Рік тому

    Didn't face any bowmasters, t1 Shirk on the draw removed by t2 bowmaster could be pretty bad.

  • @cuttlefish6839
    @cuttlefish6839 Рік тому

    Attractions are legacy viable funny enough

  • @chrishaley42
    @chrishaley42 Рік тому

    Does "Name Sticker" exist in paper?? I can't find it anywhere.

    • @GeoQuag
      @GeoQuag Рік тому +2

      It’s called “_____ goblin” (five underscores) in paper and works slightly differently. Scryfall doesn’t like to search with underscores.

    • @nicholasfarrell5981
      @nicholasfarrell5981 Рік тому

      ​@GeoQuag is there any site that actually *likes* to search the underscores? Because I know that mtgtopdecks refuses to display cards with any punctuation in the name.

  • @xakuyer
    @xakuyer Рік тому

    Mind goblin gon deez
    Trophies ???

  • @schrottinator
    @schrottinator Рік тому

    I feel bad for the Magic Online team.

  • @burtreynoldz6308
    @burtreynoldz6308 Рік тому

    Battle cry goblin doesn't have battle cry :/

  • @ankaarne
    @ankaarne Рік тому

    It's an aggro deck masquerading as a combo deck!

  • @LucksackGames
    @LucksackGames Рік тому +1

    Round one noooooo

  • @alexvalentim1418
    @alexvalentim1418 Рік тому +2

    It is simply idiotic for these sticker cards being blackborder

  • @DiegoDiaz-ne3fx
    @DiegoDiaz-ne3fx 5 місяців тому

    Ojalá me hubieses podido ayudar.

  • @wonkywombat12
    @wonkywombat12 Рік тому

    no goblin lackey is interesting

    • @BjornarUrang
      @BjornarUrang Рік тому

      Yes. This is the biggest decision point for the development of the deck, once it is online. I play lackeys and think it is the right way to go, but lackey is only a secondary route to victory in this deck. Prospector is the preferred g1 play under most circumstances. The decision whether to play lackey or not bears a lot of consequences for the rest of the list. Prospector wants small bodies to sac, and without 4 other 1-drops, it makes sense to play a high number of war marshalls. It also becomes necessary to play a high land count, to be less reliant on untapping with prospector. Lackey also makes warchief better. If you can drop warchief off lackey in the turn 2 attack, the second mainphase can become quite explosive.

    • @nicholasfarrell5981
      @nicholasfarrell5981 Рік тому

      ​@@BjornarUrangyou normally play Gobbos?

    • @wonkywombat12
      @wonkywombat12 Рік тому +1

      @@BjornarUrang that's some interesting analysis, thanks!

    • @BjornarUrang
      @BjornarUrang Рік тому +1

      @nicholasfarrell5981 Yes. But only in paper and only once a month if I can make it. But since November I've played this deck exclusively.

  • @whit4446
    @whit4446 Рік тому +14

    sticker decks are DOA in paper, absolute nightmare, needs a judge rules explanation every round, no one is going to take the time to learn a gimic unset mechanic

    • @squee147
      @squee147 Рік тому +2

      Trolls will love this deck.

    • @ThrabenUniversity
      @ThrabenUniversity  Рік тому +8

      I would honestly be fine with the paper version being errata'd to work like this.

    • @Qobp
      @Qobp Рік тому +1

      It's fitting for a goblin deck haha

    • @BjornarUrang
      @BjornarUrang Рік тому +3

      You need the ten sticker sheets with highest numbers of distinct wowels printed out and sleeved. The way I do it is I show my opponent the sticker sheets before we draw opening hands, for them to confirm the sheets are all unique. I then shuffle them and fan them open, and the opponent picks three. This has to be repeated for games two and three. It is reasonably random and quick. I've also put tiny bits of paper with numbers on them inside the sleeves, to keep track of which name stickers have been spent. There have been few questions and no complaints.

    • @whit4446
      @whit4446 Рік тому +1

      If this is legal, i demand for the immediate release of sensei’s top

  • @Luciferian.Latino
    @Luciferian.Latino Рік тому

    I didn't Mind Goblin this league

  • @crondog
    @crondog Рік тому +1

    Unfinity felt like such a betrayal. Not only did they use it to print sticker nonsense that no one wanted and everyone hated into eternal formats but they also burned the rigger/contraption mechanic that people had been waiting for since 2006.

    • @Chillax_Bro1
      @Chillax_Bro1 Рік тому

      Contraptions we’re in unstable back in 2017

  • @joek3654
    @joek3654 Рік тому

    i don’t really understand why battle cry goblin is here over a more immediate haste enabler like goblin chieftain. can someone more in the know help me out here?

    • @dumbbutthole7548
      @dumbbutthole7548 Рік тому

      Goblin warchief is in the deck too.

    • @Geroaergaroe
      @Geroaergaroe Рік тому +2

      Mind Goblin into BCG + activation is a mean burst of damage that can't be stopped by a bolt.
      G1R2 could have been a win on the spot if Phil went for BCG over warchief.
      T1 skirk into Mind Goblin 4 mana t2 is also 10 damage if you BCG + pump.

    • @ThrabenUniversity
      @ThrabenUniversity  Рік тому +5

      The pumping ability is MUCH better than it looks. I underestimated it early on.

    • @joek3654
      @joek3654 Рік тому

      ah, i was missing that the haste from battle cry goblin works through removal. that makes sense, thanks

    • @Geroaergaroe
      @Geroaergaroe Рік тому +1

      @@joek3654 Another important part is that it's *real* good with skirk. You can sac creature that are blocked to fuel more pump and gain more reach.
      It's basically the cornerstone of any aggro line in pioneer for goblin.

  • @jadegrace1312
    @jadegrace1312 Рік тому

    That round 3 delver player deserved to lose as soon as they had ouphe in their deck game 2. Unless they had literally nothing better to have in their deck, they are just stupid.

  • @dj66800
    @dj66800 Рік тому

    Y isn't a vowel...

  • @yakovdavidov7102
    @yakovdavidov7102 Рік тому

    Second..? third..?

  • @charlesdeuter
    @charlesdeuter Рік тому

    Thanks, I hate it.

  • @coryskinnon
    @coryskinnon Рік тому

    Spirit guide is bad no need for it

    • @BjornarUrang
      @BjornarUrang Рік тому

      Spirit guide does not require you to commit two cards and get blown out by ouphe, like chrome mox. But if your point is to reduce the number of fast mana, I agree. I started out on 4 of each when first testing this in paper, and now play 3 chrome mox, 2 spirit guide. I actually think spirit guide should be the better card online though: When you don´t know how much mana you will get off mind goblin, smoothing your mana with spirit guide is easier than with chrome mox, simply because you don´t need to feed it another card.

  • @Reversespacehippie
    @Reversespacehippie Рік тому

    Obligatory algorithmic contribution