Smokeless Powder Selection and Burn Rates (An Extreme Reloading Special)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @yeayeasautoadventures
    @yeayeasautoadventures 23 дні тому +1

    new sub here, good to mention that some powders are better suited for heavier/lighter projectiles

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  23 дні тому

      Thanks for subscribing and welcome to Extreme Reloading.

  • @Nonedw
    @Nonedw 24 дні тому

    Excellent job

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  23 дні тому

      Thank you.. and thanks for watching.

  • @jasonrad9332
    @jasonrad9332 24 дні тому

    Great break down!

  • @mustafaiqbal3290
    @mustafaiqbal3290 24 дні тому

    Another Excellent Video, very succinct. Can you please share the links to the websites you use to look up suitable powders for specific calibres? Many thanks once again.

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  23 дні тому

      Thank you. Besides the printed manuals, I frequently refer to Hodgdon's reloading data center website. It is here: hodgdonreloading.com/rldc/

    • @mustafaiqbal3290
      @mustafaiqbal3290 23 дні тому

      @sdkweber Thanks for your help. Appreciated

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  23 дні тому

      @@mustafaiqbal3290 You are welcome.

  • @FlorianReid-c5k
    @FlorianReid-c5k 23 дні тому

    Another informative video. Thanks. Question on a different subject: For target shooting at 1000yards, do you prefer a lighter or heavier bullet, all other things remaining the same and why?

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  23 дні тому +1

      Thank you Florian, it is good to hear from you again.
      Good question. I prefer a heavier bullet for 1000 yard+. But its not so much that the bullet is heavier as it is that the bullet will be longer and almost certainly will have a higher BC (reduced drag) to help it carry its energy over long distance.
      What are your thoughts on this?

    • @FlorianReid-c5k
      @FlorianReid-c5k 23 дні тому

      @@sdkweber I purchased my Ruger RPR 6.5Creedmoor last year and have been reloading to test different powders etc. I am only out to 600yards now so I don't have any experience with longer shots yet. I am increasing range 100yards at a time so I am ready to test for 700yards now and my goal is 1000yards.
      My thinking was that the heavier bullet would have a slower MV but more inertia. You make a good point of the length stabilizing the bullet which I assume would be complimented by the extra mass/inertia. I have heard that lighter bullets are best up to 600yards and heavier bullets beyond 600yards but I don't have any evidence to back that up. Thanks for the quick response and thoughtful comment.

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  23 дні тому

      @@FlorianReid-c5k Good for you Florian. You are definitely on the right track.

  • @dburns455
    @dburns455 24 дні тому

    I was wondering if there is a relationship between the burn rate of a powder and the length of the rifle barrel. For example, powders listed for reloading the .308 range from IMR 3031 with a burn rate listed as #108 on my burn rate chart, to Hodgdon H4350 with a burn rate listed as # 153 on the same list. Might it be relevant that a faster powder works better in a short barrel compared to a slower powder in a long barrel?

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  24 дні тому

      Could be. Primarily we use slower burning powders with larger powder volumes.
      Within a given cartridge, like the .308 Win, a longer barrel will take better advantage of a slower burning powder. Ideally, we want to have all the powder charge burned just as the bullet leaves the muzzle. This is true of any powder regardless of the burn rate. But as you suggest, a slower burning powder could be advantageous in longer barrels.
      Thanks for watching and posting.

  • @dhooter
    @dhooter 20 днів тому

    It’s called deflagration. Essentially turning a solid to a gas violently

    • @sdkweber
      @sdkweber  19 днів тому

      Thanks for the correction!