How To Solve Any Projectile Motion Problem (The Toolbox Method)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @BlueBunnyGamer
    @BlueBunnyGamer 10 років тому +1759

    *Don't use a yellow marker*

  • @garydudley6149
    @garydudley6149 4 місяці тому +3

    Brilliant! I retired from teaching in 2018 at a high school in Cape Town. I was born in 1955. My dad was a physics teacher. I also taught physics for a while, but your teaching is a stunning revelation to me! Thank you very much, Prof Mason.

  • @DeanTheMachine94
    @DeanTheMachine94 10 років тому +297

    13 min video taught me more than a three hour lecture...

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  10 років тому +12

      Glad that you found the toolbox method useful, Dean! Feel free to share this video with your teacher. =)

    • @rushilg216
      @rushilg216 4 місяці тому

      bro u alive?

  • @chelseageorge2814
    @chelseageorge2814 8 років тому +42

    Remember that time I fell in love with a video and the clarity it brought?

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  8 років тому +8

      +Chelsea George I do, I do! Cheers from Detroit, Chelsea!

  • @JesseMason
    @JesseMason  10 років тому +78

    @Anthony Willson: If you can tolerate me sounding drunk, click the Gear button below the video and set me to 0.5 speed.

    • @ballsolove
      @ballsolove 10 років тому +9

      i did this. and it totally made my day! Thanks.

    • @JerryLi
      @JerryLi 10 років тому +1

      Awesome reply :D

    • @Singh2jz
      @Singh2jz 10 років тому +1

      Jerry Li yo, are you studying for the PQ as well? Good luck!

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  10 років тому +2

      Jerry Li Thanks. =)

    • @BubbaYoga
      @BubbaYoga 10 років тому +1

      It reminds me of my typing teacher in grade 10. Mr. Dudley was a great guy but he smelled funny and I didn't suffer from anosmia.
      Nice vids, thanks!

  • @FrostByte_AC
    @FrostByte_AC 8 років тому +1037

    I wish I could give you the money I give my useless professor.

    • @shollahanafiah4496
      @shollahanafiah4496 8 років тому +8

      +FrostByte how does he get 5.68s? what is y0?

    • @krishserai6252
      @krishserai6252 7 років тому +1

      Sholla Hanafiah y0 is displacement bro taken in projection cocepy

    • @aryanathawale6053
      @aryanathawale6053 7 років тому +4

      is it 100m?

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  7 років тому +56

      That makes two of us.

    • @bbrown9763
      @bbrown9763 6 років тому +5

      Yup. I was right along with him, then he skipped solving the quadratic, and I'm out.

  • @JesseMason
    @JesseMason  11 років тому +70

    Start every projectile motion problem with the Displacement Equation (DE) and the Velocity Equation (VE) for both horizontal and vertical directions. Next modify the equations to reflect your known values - creating a toolbox! Then solve for your unknown quantity. Good luck!

  • @dilaraduman955
    @dilaraduman955 5 років тому +1

    You made physics understandable for the first time in my 5 years of university life! God bless you Jesse!

  • @frosty9908
    @frosty9908 3 роки тому +3

    I just watching this now and in 15 minutes I have a test on this. I LOVE LIFE!!

  • @ayecob558
    @ayecob558 5 років тому

    Thank you so much. $ for college tuition is worthless when you have a teacher that doesn't explain things well. This was my second time taking physics and I have an exam tomorrow and did not understand projectile motion. The way you explained the process was clear and concise, and the effort and production that you put into making your videos neat, informative, and short at the same time is awesome. Really cannot thank you enough!

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  5 років тому

      Thank you for the kind words, Jacob. Hope you crushed today's test!

  • @melissapelaez9486
    @melissapelaez9486 7 років тому

    Reviewing for a physics certification test...THANK YOU!!! You helped make sense out of all the formulas in the toolbox! Instead of trying to memorize these formulas, you helped me understand where they come from! Yay logic!!!

  • @moiseshema552
    @moiseshema552 5 років тому +1

    so far,this is the best tutorial video found on UA-cam!

  • @Mellow429
    @Mellow429 3 роки тому

    Idk what's more beautiful...the steps or your handwriting

  • @shubhampriyadarshi9719
    @shubhampriyadarshi9719 8 років тому +20

    awesome man ...who the hell are you .....love to study from you

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  8 років тому +69

      I am Batman, no wait, I am Jesse Mason.

  • @mathlover2299
    @mathlover2299 8 років тому

    I learned more in this video than in 3 weeks of instruction. (at least about these types of problems)

  • @danieltorres3820
    @danieltorres3820 6 років тому

    The clarity... Wow you're an amazing instructor

  • @ilovebookandmovie
    @ilovebookandmovie 10 років тому +2

    This saved my academic life! Thank you!

  • @JesseMason
    @JesseMason  11 років тому +5

    The magnitude of g is negative, Ian!

  • @prasoon-manandhar
    @prasoon-manandhar 9 років тому

    its an honor to see you, professor stoddard and my favorite guy Ryan ... i miss physics with you guys

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      Hi! Which class were you in, Prasoon?

  • @abdullahshafiq4655
    @abdullahshafiq4655 8 років тому

    ONE OF THE BEST LECTURE I HAVE EVER SEEN PROUD OF U MATE

  • @jayliu7786
    @jayliu7786 5 років тому +1

    Amazing explanation that helped me understand my college physics lecture. Thank you for sharing! I wish my college professor were as good as explaining the 2D motion problems as you explained them. Thanks for your help! Hoping to pass Physics this college semester and your video helps clarify some concepts that I had been struggling with.

  • @riceskywalker3332
    @riceskywalker3332 7 років тому

    You should explain further on since most people often dont know what Vy, Vx and etc. are but thanks for your knowledge and sharing it

  • @ArticlesnCoins
    @ArticlesnCoins 7 років тому

    so late on the boat but you just saved my entire friends and me from failing , thank you so much

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  7 років тому

      Glad to lend a helping hand, Lawliet. =)

  • @SuperRederic
    @SuperRederic 8 років тому +195

    you lost me after the first 1min and my physics half yearly is tomoz rip me

  • @andyrichter8452
    @andyrichter8452 6 років тому

    Nicely done. One important quibble though: g is a "constant" and is never negative (just like "e" is always 1.6 x 10^-19 C though the charge on an electron is -e). What you should have instead is ay = -g when your +y direction is upward.

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  6 років тому

      Wow. I never thought of it that way... but am compelled to completely agree with you. Thanks, Andrew!!

  • @benjaminhartman4488
    @benjaminhartman4488 7 років тому

    I'm thinking of starting my own youtube channel dealing with tutoring physics. I think you did a great job but I think someone learning this material would benefit from seeing the material being filled in in a linear fashion, top to bottom.

  • @ncediswacekiso7448
    @ncediswacekiso7448 9 років тому

    thank you a lot it took you a few minutes to explain this and for me to understand...while in class it took me 3 weeks to just get confused if you get what i mean.

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      ncediswa cekiso Delighted to clear it up for you, Ncediswa!

  • @ahmedelshehaby
    @ahmedelshehaby 9 років тому

    man ty so much, ur a great human being and u helped me alot with the exam i'm having in 3 hrs
    i'm so grateful and i wish u nothing but the best in ur life and i'm gonna be back to ur channel whenever i need something :)
    thanks again :)

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому +1

      Ahmed Elshehaby Hope the exam went well, Ahmed! Cheers from Detroit.

  • @nanib2567
    @nanib2567 9 років тому +3

    YOU HAVE SAVED ME THANK YOU SO MUCH

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому +3

      I helped you. You saved yourself. Nice work, Nani!

  • @Gabriela-zf1jy
    @Gabriela-zf1jy 7 років тому

    Used your video as part of a review for my Dynamics exam.

  • @Silverfrost128
    @Silverfrost128 9 років тому

    my teacher is teaching us the "chart method" but combined with this its 1000000x more understandable

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  8 років тому

      +Silverfrost128 Never heard of the chart method.

  • @nilsgjertson7831
    @nilsgjertson7831 6 років тому

    Thank you for the very organized, neat handwriting. It helps clear everything up when i'm in a class with so many people and can't get the individual attention I need for some things. As mentioned below, please ditch the yellow sharpie, on paper it might be distinguishable but over a youtube video it's hard to see. Thanks again!

  • @codex2765
    @codex2765 4 роки тому +4

    7 years later does he still reply to comments?

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  4 роки тому +3

      My vanity knows no bounds.

    • @jlbenson
      @jlbenson 4 роки тому

      @@JesseMason Good video. Just one thing: magnitude is never negative.

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  4 роки тому +1

      @@jlbenson I used to have an annotation that pops up with this correction. I have no idea where it went. Thanks for letting me know, John - will look into this!

  • @Moon-dz4ib
    @Moon-dz4ib 8 років тому +3

    helpful but I need to re-watch it more than once..thanks!

  • @adamkulam7368
    @adamkulam7368 10 років тому

    Hello sir. I cannot thank you enough for explaining this all to me...I am currently in AP Physics C (as my FIRST physics class), and this makes sense.

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  10 років тому

      Great to hear it helped, Adam. Come back for Kirchhoff's if you take physics 2!

  • @Dianayopli
    @Dianayopli 8 років тому

    Wow! You're really talented. You find the way to make things easy and funny with the right concepts. Thank you so much. You should continue making more videos like this, your "how to solve..." are fantastic!

  • @Vivi-nf9tt
    @Vivi-nf9tt 6 років тому

    you are so good and precise, I should've watched this before going to the lecture, wow nice. I will remember the singing in my test, haha!

  • @celinewong3089
    @celinewong3089 8 років тому +2

    Your teaching technique is wonderful and awesome...I like the way u teach

  • @sumeyaasir2845
    @sumeyaasir2845 8 років тому

    you're the best of best physics teacher

  • @richardkennesson4180
    @richardkennesson4180 9 років тому +12

    I had trouble with the quadratic because my TI84 Plus Silver requires parenthesis before the square. So (30sin(20))^2.
    so...
    (30*sin(20) - sqrt(30sin(20))^2 - 4(.5)(-9.8)(100)) / (2(.5)(-9.8))
    Hope that helps somebody else.

    • @dontbeserious5153
      @dontbeserious5153 5 років тому +1

      Thanks for your help I was using positive for gravity which gave me math error
      Looks like you helped in other ways too

    • @alvelymondragon33
      @alvelymondragon33 5 років тому

      @@dontbeserious5153 same!

  • @MARTKARBLE
    @MARTKARBLE 9 років тому +1

    Great video. Really well made, interesting, to the point, and informative. Thanks bud.

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому +1

      MARTKARBLE Glad you liked it, MARTKARBLE - cheers from Detroit!

  • @mcdirtking
    @mcdirtking 7 років тому

    That was legit the most helpful video I've ever seen!

  • @ramanathreyan
    @ramanathreyan 6 років тому

    Thanks Man. That was very swift and smooth without much hassle..

  • @hirakhalid1143
    @hirakhalid1143 2 роки тому

    you made numerical problem a game to play full of concepts amazing diagrams and that bullet fire sound from cannon )))))

  • @itsyelrosales
    @itsyelrosales 8 років тому

    This is amazing! I'm having a hard time understanding Physics problems like this and this really helped me a lot! thank you!

  • @KidusYohannes
    @KidusYohannes 8 років тому

    This was explained wonderfully. Thanks much and hopefully I can do the method by myself

  • @sidnotthesloth1827
    @sidnotthesloth1827 5 років тому

    Please make a physics series . The way you call the velocity and the sub ohs is different but still makes life easy

  • @PaulaPerez-rz1kw
    @PaulaPerez-rz1kw 7 років тому +6

    I feel like I’m about to have a nervous breakdown god why did I have to take physics

  • @tapandgo2279
    @tapandgo2279 4 роки тому

    For finding the range, when y=0, you are better off using the null factor law which is a breeze compared to using the quadratic formula. :)

  • @Vitex5850
    @Vitex5850 7 років тому

    this deserves a sub. Thanks man, really helpful!

  • @maryann1ization
    @maryann1ization 10 років тому

    Great video! OMG, you're so much more awesome than my physics prof!

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  10 років тому

      Glad you liked it, Maryann!

  • @jh695
    @jh695 7 років тому

    fantastic demonstration and editing

  • @cassidywilson6177
    @cassidywilson6177 8 років тому

    I might just pass my test tomorrow because of this, wow!

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  8 років тому

      How'd it go, Cass?

    • @cassidywilson6177
      @cassidywilson6177 8 років тому

      Got an 80! It was mostly conceptual problems so I think I did alright on the math parts. Waiting on our FRQ scores though.

  • @kiarascreaigh7124
    @kiarascreaigh7124 7 років тому

    @Jesse Mason would you be able to explain how you used the quadratic equation to get time, I have tried it on my own and haven't gotten the same answer, very much appreciated, this is a great video !!!!

  • @AK-di4rv
    @AK-di4rv 7 років тому

    In projectile motion, horizontal velocity is constant, so it's total velocity at its highest point it equal to the horizontal velocity. However, it's vertical velocity "AT" its highest point is zero.

  • @ummoop9802
    @ummoop9802 Рік тому +1

    ur an absolute lifesaver

  • @souravghosh31
    @souravghosh31 9 років тому +10

    sir you are genious but sir what to do when the projectile is not on a given height

    • @Peter_1986
      @Peter_1986 8 років тому +4

      +sourav ghosh
      You can just set the initial height to zero, and proceed from there.

    • @AlchemistOfNirnroot
      @AlchemistOfNirnroot 8 років тому

      +Sourav Ghosh Pretty much the same thing. List all the horizontal and vertical competent information listed downward, SUVAT. Some information is already known, horizontal acceleration is zero whilst vertical is -g (given that 'up' is taken as positive). Also, at the maximum height final velocity is zero (or initial if considering the right hand side). Then select the correct equation with the variables you know and one unknown. Give me a example question if you want.

  • @zerenmandac3388
    @zerenmandac3388 9 років тому

    Thank you! I'm not entirely sure I get these but I think its better than what I had started out with. I don't fully understand the imi hat and j hat things but i guess it's fine.

  • @kamalgurung3459
    @kamalgurung3459 8 років тому

    It really helped a lot. Thank you very much from the bottom of my heart

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  8 років тому +1

      You're welcome from the top of my head, Saugat! ;)

  • @Kupal2024
    @Kupal2024 5 років тому

    I love the way you teach.

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  5 років тому

      Thanks, Kevin - that means a lot to me. =)

  • @SukhpreetSingh-fv9wt
    @SukhpreetSingh-fv9wt 7 років тому

    i do not need to watch it over again as i ask my professor to teach me again and again same problem hahahhaa

  • @daniloorbolato
    @daniloorbolato 7 років тому

    Amazing lecture! Subscribed and saved to my playlist! Thank you!

  • @mariloudolor2656
    @mariloudolor2656 6 років тому +1

    Thank you for making this video. I learned from it.

  • @soniamwamba5445
    @soniamwamba5445 9 років тому

    i enjoy these lessons cause I understand totally

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      +Sonia Mwamba Thanks, Sonia! Cheers from Detroit!

  • @Sassasin2011
    @Sassasin2011 9 років тому +1

    Amazing!! Thanks a bunch for the clarification

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      +Kareem Sasa Glad to clear it up for you, Kareem!

  • @nourankb1966
    @nourankb1966 5 років тому

    you're video is awesome and perfect and soooo helpful.. we need more..

  • @RexGalilae
    @RexGalilae 9 років тому

    Your channel deserves more attention than it gets atm. I suggest you join makers studio or something. It may help...:)

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому +1

      Makers Studio? I'll look into it. Thanks, Mohammed!

    • @RexGalilae
      @RexGalilae 9 років тому

      Jesse Mason
      I wish that your channel's attributes match with their membership criteria.
      All the best, sir and keep making those great physics videos!! :)

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      Mohammed Zaid Cheers, Mohammed!

  • @st.clairdeshong5116
    @st.clairdeshong5116 7 років тому +2

    I'm not that great with these problems but (correct me if I'm wrong) I think your displacement in the y direction should have been equal to the height of the cliff, which in turn would have given a different value for t...which affects the rest of the problem. I could be wrong. Just saying.

    • @nataliaalejandra3151
      @nataliaalejandra3151 7 років тому

      Yeah I was thinking the same thing...

    • @blorphmorph5281
      @blorphmorph5281 7 років тому

      to get time, he did input the hight of the cliff as the initial y position.
      the decplacement however, equals zero at the time of impact.

  • @jamesjones-uk3zu
    @jamesjones-uk3zu 8 років тому

    So are those equations what I use for all/most projectile motion problems?
    Ps- thank you this video was very helpful! My college professor doesn't like to teach so I have to do it through UA-cam

  • @shreshth22221
    @shreshth22221 10 років тому +1

    This simplifies every aspect of the problem! Thanks Jesse

  • @physicsas5007
    @physicsas5007 7 років тому

    awesome method of teaching. it really helpful

  • @LaggyGoBoom
    @LaggyGoBoom 8 років тому

    The quadratic formula song is now stuck in my head... well at least I wont forget it in the next test :)

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  8 років тому +1

      I heard it once and it stuck. Math ear worm!

  • @alexwallner
    @alexwallner 5 років тому

    you saved my life sir !! Thanks a lot

  • @TO1TomGaming
    @TO1TomGaming 10 років тому

    Great video, Thanks for putting so much time and effort into it

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      Nice to have my efforts noticed. I spent the better part of 2 weeks on this one.

  • @thendomatshisevhe4365
    @thendomatshisevhe4365 9 років тому +1

    You make physics fun!!!!!!

  • @janon8518
    @janon8518 9 років тому

    How do you find the distance of a horizontally shot projectile if the only given is the vertical displacement and the velocity? There is also a man standing 1500 away from it. Please help me!

  • @omerihtizaz9043
    @omerihtizaz9043 6 років тому

    Wish you could teach this to our "(Ph.D)" Professors at College..

  • @rabbiyahbaksh9436
    @rabbiyahbaksh9436 7 років тому

    This is such an amazing explanation!!!!!

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  7 років тому

      Glad you like it, Rabbiyah!

  • @jjwesker1061
    @jjwesker1061 4 роки тому +1

    Just in time before AP Physics Projectiles Exam

  • @tyhystreasuretrove7315
    @tyhystreasuretrove7315 3 роки тому

    You know what I’ve learned from this and the comments
    1. All of our actual physics teachers are trash at teaching
    -I can def relate mine sucks
    2. We are watching this before a test/exam
    -u bet I am
    3. Projectile motion.

  • @pvtiongson293
    @pvtiongson293 7 років тому

    You should do more videos like this! Great stuff! :) Cheers!

  • @cmackatlanta
    @cmackatlanta 7 років тому

    So how would I calculate the angle of impact on a parabolic trajectory? If I were given a ballistics chart based on known drag coefficient spec?

  • @PaulBrown-tj4zt
    @PaulBrown-tj4zt 9 років тому

    really helpful sir, keep uploading more such videos thank you.

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      mudaliar kushal Will do - thanks for the encouragement, Mudaliar!

  • @Tomlatham69
    @Tomlatham69 8 років тому

    You re simply awesome.....post some new projectile topics.....

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  8 років тому

      What sort of projectile topics would be helpful to you, Aditya?

  • @user-bl6ni3yu4p
    @user-bl6ni3yu4p 5 років тому

    The explosion sound effect made me flinch lmao

  • @davidbrazcostagomes1474
    @davidbrazcostagomes1474 9 років тому +1

    I absolutely loved this video!
    Thank you so much and greeting from Australia

  • @nahimjustanobody1170
    @nahimjustanobody1170 6 років тому

    Hey I was just wondering...we have used the formula for range and I get a different result....

  • @fulgrimmichaelis7251
    @fulgrimmichaelis7251 8 років тому

    I have a question, sir. Why is the DE not = Vot + (1/2)at^2? What is the Xo/Yo in the end, represent?

  • @SagarSingh-fd7ss
    @SagarSingh-fd7ss 7 років тому

    Hi Jesse, Very well explained the concept of projectile. Would you be able to add more problems from Engineering Dynamics on various diff. topics? Appreciated and thanks for clarifying projectile approach.

  • @jaela3876
    @jaela3876 4 роки тому

    Had to learn this in a day yo

  • @NikitaBoopathi
    @NikitaBoopathi 7 років тому

    I kindly request you to make videos on electric field and charges, and solving problems related to magnetism and matter

  • @nicoledougherty9917
    @nicoledougherty9917 9 років тому

    Im confused on the time equation/ what do you substitute for the Yo in the quadratic formula?

  • @indoororchidsandtropicals358
    @indoororchidsandtropicals358 4 роки тому

    But if you are shooting something off above the x axis, then Yo is the height at the beginning, not at the end of impact when the projectile hits the x axis when Y=0, so wouldn't you add that original height into the quadratjc and then you're solving for the time at the beginning, not at the end.

  • @AnandYadav-bt6or
    @AnandYadav-bt6or Рік тому

    This is crazy good and useful

  • @_nognom
    @_nognom 9 років тому

    Great explanation. Thank you!

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      +denmcca Cheers, denmcca!

  • @noyalmartin1058
    @noyalmartin1058 5 років тому

    God must clearly be real because this video is a miracle of life

  • @oncetwice5748
    @oncetwice5748 7 років тому

    is it only me, or the cannon really look kind'a weird.......you know that thing.....anyway you're sure better than my physics teacher....

  • @palmoasis
    @palmoasis 7 років тому

    i tried to do this on my own but when calculating the time, the numbewr inside the radical was negative, (104.4-2000) ?? what have i done wrongg? please someone help me out with this

  • @th3stor3
    @th3stor3 9 років тому

    The toolbox was sooo helpful!!! Do you do any harder sruff? Like when we have two football players that are running n throwing a ball back n forth?

    • @JesseMason
      @JesseMason  9 років тому

      Hi Franchesca! I've never attempted a foosball problem like that. Specifics?

  • @ishbernabe4527
    @ishbernabe4527 7 років тому

    How did you get the -3.59, 5.68 at the range? You shortcut the solution