Glückwunsch an Porsche. Das ist echt schnell. Der BMW-M4-CSL braucht 1:29,54 und der Porsche GT4RS braucht 1:29,12. Beide fast 5 Sekunden langsamer--->Krass.
Wo gibt es denn weitere daten zu dem fahrzeug? Z.b. wieviel grad nachlauf hat der Karren usw. Immer steht nur zeug wie radstand, motorleistung, gewicht, reifen... so das standartzeug halt.
Good time - but just over a second quicker than the 991.2 GT3 RS. I'm not that impressed with the 992 GT3 RS whereas the 991.2 GT3 RS was outstanding when it was released and still is today. The 992 GT3 RS is more of a technical test piece with a lot more aero and much stiffer suspension (50% increase in spring rates, front and rear). Moreover, where this has been tested in France and US it didn't go so well e.g. at Big Willow, the 992 GT3 RS was slower than the 991.2 GT3 RS and 991 GT2 RS.
Big Willow is a track with long acceleration phases, in which the downforce actually slows the car down. On carwow, the 991 Turbo S was 4 seconds faster than the GT3 (RS?) on Spa as well, same dilemma. And actually, the suspension in the 992 GT3 RS goes from "harder than a Senna" to "weaker than a Rolls Royce". The adaptable damping on the fly is insane. Not calling the GT3 RS more comfortable than a Rolls Royce though, just to clarify 😂
@@BVZTIII At the end of the day the calibration of damping has to fit within a certain range relative the spring rate/wheel rate. I think what Porsche have done is technically excellent but so niche that its almost irrelevant e.g. just use a Cup car. I kept my 991.2 GT3 RS because its more useable and bought a 296 GTB instead of a 992 GT3 RS. I really feel the 991.2 GT cars are going to be seen as peak Porsche - they got so much right with that series. I'd add to that the 982 GT4 RS which is really based around a 10 year old chassis and struts and yet in the hand of Car and Driver went faster round VIR than the 992 GT3. I've owned too many Porsche cars to be fooled by their very good marketing. 😀
@@VK6AB- funny how you mention Virginia, but entirely ignore both Magny Cours layouts, in which the GT3 RS absolutely demolished the GT4 by being 3.17 seconds respectively 5.1 seconds faster. Or the Nordschleife, where it was around 20 seconds faster for both times. Or Hockenheim GP, where it was 3.2 seconds faster. Or this very Sachsenring lap, under which we're commenting, where it was 4.25 seconds faster. Double standards played through... And I don't see how flexing with your alleged cars brings anything argumentative to the table 🤔
@@BVZTIII LOL plus five years of Carrera Cup and many years of road rallying. 500HP cars on the same coefficient of friction tires will do remarkably similar times and vary depending on circuit layout and whether they are fast or slow circuits. Thats a fact - I logged the GT3 RS at two of Europes fastest circuits - I know exactly what its capable of and its just not that impressive or rather it did exactly what I thought it would do. The GT4 RS is by far the more interesting car on public roads - the 992 GT3 RS is a lifestyle car, if I want to lap fast I'll use one of my two Cup Cars and do it safely lol. The driver makes the car...........you obviously got suckered by Porsche marketing - I didn't hence the 296 GTB. Have a nice day 😀
@@VK6AB- source: trustmebro The GT4 RS and 992 GT3 RS are equipped with *the same* Michelin Cup 2 R compound and the GT4 RS is still several seconds slower. Doesn't quite help your credibility 🤡
Aracın arka tarafının yol tutuşunu kaybediyor direksiyon hareketleri ile pilot. Yanlış kullanıyor. Daha iyi bir pilotla rahat 1 saniye hızlı gider Porsche.
Glückwunsch an Porsche. Das ist echt schnell.
Der BMW-M4-CSL braucht 1:29,54 und der Porsche GT4RS braucht 1:29,12.
Beide fast 5 Sekunden langsamer--->Krass.
Wo gibt es denn weitere daten zu dem fahrzeug?
Z.b. wieviel grad nachlauf hat der Karren usw.
Immer steht nur zeug wie radstand, motorleistung, gewicht, reifen... so das standartzeug halt.
Warum werden hier meine informativen Links zu den Sachsenring Bestzeiten auf fastestLaps gelöscht/wegzensiert?
Eine Rangliste zum Vergleich wäre gut
Zweitplazierter ist Mclaren Senna, 0.3 langsamer.
@@senadhasanbasic260 Wahnsinn. Unfassbar was Porsche wieder mal mit "wenig" PS rausholt.
@@zaphod2 Kann keiner so gut wie Porsche
Nice!
The boss.
Ist der eigentliche Rekord nicht 1:17 min von nem Hurracan GT3 EVO 2?
Would be great to see how it compares to the other top times 🙏
0.3 faster than a Mclaren Senna.
@@senadhasanbasic260 jesus thats insane
@@senadhasanbasic260 it’s good to see the new RS getting the praise it deserves, especially on track!
@@taforth big facts, this car just delivers
👍❤
Good time - but just over a second quicker than the 991.2 GT3 RS. I'm not that impressed with the 992 GT3 RS whereas the 991.2 GT3 RS was outstanding when it was released and still is today. The 992 GT3 RS is more of a technical test piece with a lot more aero and much stiffer suspension (50% increase in spring rates, front and rear). Moreover, where this has been tested in France and US it didn't go so well e.g. at Big Willow, the 992 GT3 RS was slower than the 991.2 GT3 RS and 991 GT2 RS.
Big Willow is a track with long acceleration phases, in which the downforce actually slows the car down. On carwow, the 991 Turbo S was 4 seconds faster than the GT3 (RS?) on Spa as well, same dilemma.
And actually, the suspension in the 992 GT3 RS goes from "harder than a Senna" to "weaker than a Rolls Royce". The adaptable damping on the fly is insane. Not calling the GT3 RS more comfortable than a Rolls Royce though, just to clarify 😂
@@BVZTIII At the end of the day the calibration of damping has to fit within a certain range relative the spring rate/wheel rate. I think what Porsche have done is technically excellent but so niche that its almost irrelevant e.g. just use a Cup car. I kept my 991.2 GT3 RS because its more useable and bought a 296 GTB instead of a 992 GT3 RS. I really feel the 991.2 GT cars are going to be seen as peak Porsche - they got so much right with that series. I'd add to that the 982 GT4 RS which is really based around a 10 year old chassis and struts and yet in the hand of Car and Driver went faster round VIR than the 992 GT3. I've owned too many Porsche cars to be fooled by their very good marketing. 😀
@@VK6AB- funny how you mention Virginia, but entirely ignore both Magny Cours layouts, in which the GT3 RS absolutely demolished the GT4 by being 3.17 seconds respectively 5.1 seconds faster. Or the Nordschleife, where it was around 20 seconds faster for both times. Or Hockenheim GP, where it was 3.2 seconds faster. Or this very Sachsenring lap, under which we're commenting, where it was 4.25 seconds faster. Double standards played through...
And I don't see how flexing with your alleged cars brings anything argumentative to the table 🤔
@@BVZTIII LOL plus five years of Carrera Cup and many years of road rallying. 500HP cars on the same coefficient of friction tires will do remarkably similar times and vary depending on circuit layout and whether they are fast or slow circuits. Thats a fact - I logged the GT3 RS at two of Europes fastest circuits - I know exactly what its capable of and its just not that impressive or rather it did exactly what I thought it would do. The GT4 RS is by far the more interesting car on public roads - the 992 GT3 RS is a lifestyle car, if I want to lap fast I'll use one of my two Cup Cars and do it safely lol. The driver makes the car...........you obviously got suckered by Porsche marketing - I didn't hence the 296 GTB. Have a nice day 😀
@@VK6AB- source: trustmebro
The GT4 RS and 992 GT3 RS are equipped with *the same* Michelin Cup 2 R compound and the GT4 RS is still several seconds slower. Doesn't quite help your credibility 🤡
Aracın arka tarafının yol tutuşunu kaybediyor direksiyon hareketleri ile pilot. Yanlış kullanıyor. Daha iyi bir pilotla rahat 1 saniye hızlı gider Porsche.
Ich sehe da keine falschen Lenkbewegungen. Höchstwahrscheinlich verstehst du nur die Fahrtechnik nicht, wenn man auf diesem Level fährt