@@vsevolodtokarev I don't have any of those. If I know of a decent safe, I will recommend it here. What I have are videos of security failures, lots of dangerous gadgets.
I like how UA-cam is capable of suggesting some videos in which you said these lines when I searched "the damage is done" on your channel. I think it's capable of searching (to some degree) within the automated captions of the videos for keywords. If I search "you could just give it a good shake", I instantly find the Union Safe with too many ways to break in.
() I keep forgetting how stupid these things are programmed to be. Instead of greeting them with the same cheerful tune - Just changing the response to a farting noise when there's no print registered would immediately inform the user that the safe is compromised - without increasing parts count. Making it hesitate/require confirmation to 'lock' without a registered print (illuminating the scanner until button pressed again) would inform the user that it wants a print - without increasing parts count. Making it refuse to lock (quickly) without using a registered fingerprint would force the user to return it to a more 'secure' condition - without increasing parts count.
No. The bypass lock installed in this is a short-cylinder cross lock. I've demonstrated how to open them on this channel using tools any non-expert lock picker can use. Besides, the reason that some biometric handgun safes were recalled recently was this identical programming issue. If someone makes a mistake enrolling a fingerprint, that person has no way of knowing the safe will still open for any fingerprint without actively testing the safe. The risk of somebody leaving a safe available to anyone is too great, so devices that have this programming oversight are being recalled.
![[1463] Better Than Most: Vaultek VS20 Gun Safe](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7ArvsOvBBLw/mqdefault.jpg)
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Let me know if you would like to see more from my archives! I have tons of unposted video.
Yes, please! Especially of decent safes.
@@vsevolodtokarev I don't have any of those. If I know of a decent safe, I will recommend it here. What I have are videos of security failures, lots of dangerous gadgets.
Archived videos are always nice.
Always good to hear from you.
Before watching the video, the biometric and the hidden bypass lock reminded me of the Verifi Smart Safe, before they listened to your feedback.
Well, at least the Verifi Smart Safe looked like it was worth its price
This box is nearly identical to the Smart Safes. The basic box fabrication has been around for years and years.
2:25 _"The damage is done."_ - Dave
I like how UA-cam is capable of suggesting some videos in which you said these lines when I searched "the damage is done" on your channel.
I think it's capable of searching (to some degree) within the automated captions of the videos for keywords. If I search "you could just give it a good shake", I instantly find the Union Safe with too many ways to break in.
@@replacesoundboard I did not know this! I'll play around with searching...
() I keep forgetting how stupid these things are programmed to be. Instead of greeting them with the same cheerful tune -
Just changing the response to a farting noise when there's no print registered would immediately inform the user that the safe is compromised - without increasing parts count.
Making it hesitate/require confirmation to 'lock' without a registered print (illuminating the scanner until button pressed again) would inform the user that it wants a print - without increasing parts count.
Making it refuse to lock (quickly) without using a registered fingerprint would force the user to return it to a more 'secure' condition - without increasing parts count.
If that button is moved to a different place, I wonder if this safe will get your approval?
No. The bypass lock installed in this is a short-cylinder cross lock. I've demonstrated how to open them on this channel using tools any non-expert lock picker can use.
Besides, the reason that some biometric handgun safes were recalled recently was this identical programming issue. If someone makes a mistake enrolling a fingerprint, that person has no way of knowing the safe will still open for any fingerprint without actively testing the safe. The risk of somebody leaving a safe available to anyone is too great, so devices that have this programming oversight are being recalled.
Did you ever do a GunBox video? Also, will you be doing a Wyze review as well?
No, I never did a GunBox video. I doubt that I will. They just aren't that popular anymore. As for a Wyze review, I don't know. I'll think about it.
@@HandgunSafe you’re the only source I trust.
@@tomcepek498 Flattery will get you nowhere. 😀Let me see if I have the money and time to look at the Wyze thing.
@@HandgunSafe lol appreciate it- hopefully they send you a freebie