Top 10 Strongest Navies in the World

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лют 2021
  • Armed forces are made up of land, sea and air forces. Naval forces are established for protection against threats coming from seas. So, what are the strongest naval forces in the world?
    In this video, we have examined the world's top 10 best Navies .. VSB defense, provides a unique excellent video of data concerning today's world military powers. Over 50 world military powers, (army, air force, land forces, naval forces, special forces) are considered in the ranking which allows for a broad opportunity of comparisons to be achieved concerning relative military strengths.
    ------------------
    VSB defense
    ✪ Subscribe: goo.gl/Yw7h55
    --------------------------
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,3 тис.

  • @jayanandahalemane331
    @jayanandahalemane331 2 роки тому +3

    Very. Good. Information. Thank. You.

  • @toanvu9794
    @toanvu9794 2 роки тому +5

    Kiến thức hay quá em đã học đc thêm rất nhiều kiến thức, với mỗi loại tầu kể trên mà có thêm phân thông số kỹ thuật nữa thì chắc chắn sẽ đầy đủ thông tin và hay hơn ạ em cảm ơn

  • @sudhendugupte7562
    @sudhendugupte7562 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this information thanks.

  • @sayidmhaiqal1189
    @sayidmhaiqal1189 2 роки тому +1

    Next on to top 10 most powerful navy forces part 2 please...

  • @user-rj8yp8ko6w
    @user-rj8yp8ko6w 3 роки тому +6

    정보도 충실하고 구독누르고 갑니다.

    • @skyzoun1509
      @skyzoun1509 2 роки тому +1

      @Mac’s Jack! We're talking about the navy here, not mortars

  • @em-ers.r.o.1244
    @em-ers.r.o.1244 2 роки тому +24

    Je super mať veľké námorníctvo no ešte lepšie mať zbrane čo ich potopia🙂

    • @klausbartel4812
      @klausbartel4812 2 роки тому

      Ein Drittel aller Schiffe wird untergehen. Also wird es einen sinnlosen Kampf auf dem Wasser geben. Was haben all diese Schiffe in Afghanistan oder in Stalingrad genutzt? Machtgehabe. Wenn du einen Krieg gewinnen willst, musst du an Land gehen, bis in die Städte hinein. Den ersten Krieg, den du gewonnen hast, ist der, den du nicht beginnst.

    • @em-ers.r.o.1244
      @em-ers.r.o.1244 2 роки тому +1

      Sie haben Recht.

    • @esthwhite8403
      @esthwhite8403 Рік тому

      yes,and that's what DF-26 and his family do😂

    • @maxlin3442
      @maxlin3442 2 місяці тому

      ​@@esthwhite8403ASBM/Hypersonic missiles does not work because they can't track targets accurately due to the plasma buildup

    • @esthwhite8403
      @esthwhite8403 2 місяці тому

      @@maxlin3442 ok, by the way, What would happen if the missile jamming system had to deal with a saturation attack of 100 df26?What if it's a hypersonic missile DF17

  • @raymondcaldwell8403
    @raymondcaldwell8403 2 роки тому +2

    great video and background music

  • @yawgyasi2171
    @yawgyasi2171 2 роки тому

    I really love your show

  • @erdiguler3726
    @erdiguler3726 2 роки тому +16

    Turkey is the country that builds its own ship and makes its own guided missile (Atmaca). More effective than Harpoon.

  • @Alexander-tj2dn
    @Alexander-tj2dn 3 роки тому +9

    You can make a bloody destruction with all these boats.

  • @albertvicic1816
    @albertvicic1816 2 роки тому +1

    Excelent video ⛴

  • @sulaimanmohid6039
    @sulaimanmohid6039 2 роки тому +20

    Why not include cruisers? They definitely not destroyers or frigates..

  • @jaymarpadayao6482
    @jaymarpadayao6482 2 роки тому +3

    Depends upon the tactics

  • @pcmcpmroom2262
    @pcmcpmroom2262 3 роки тому +6

    ยอดเยี่ยม.เวลาผ่านไปอีก10ปี.เราจะเห็นอาวุธที่ดีขึ้น.สุดยอดขึ้น.อันดับน่าเกรงขามคงเปลี่ยน.สลับไปตามการพัฒนา.สำคัญเงินวิจัย.และเงินจัดสร้างมันมหาศาล

  • @Respect-vt7uv
    @Respect-vt7uv 2 роки тому +1

    Respect

  • @halicarnassus834
    @halicarnassus834 2 роки тому +2

    one MAJOR difference between Chinese and American nuclear attack submarines is that, the Chinese nuclear submarine is loud and the American submarine can detect it. we Americans might consider giving the Republic of Korea and Japan one of our undetectables...

  • @gualtierocattaneo2334
    @gualtierocattaneo2334 2 роки тому +94

    The Italian Navy has also three helicopter carriers, the "Santi" class.

  • @electronbashful540
    @electronbashful540 2 роки тому +6

    Japan is No.2

  • @user-ey7kf3eg5l
    @user-ey7kf3eg5l 9 місяців тому +2

    تعزيز القوات الأمريكية في الخليج وخصوصاً السعودية لمحاربت التنظيم الدعشي وتنضيم القاعدة الذي انطلق منها
    ابو باقر الكصاب الكاظمي

  • @phenghaikim-__-3794
    @phenghaikim-__-3794 3 роки тому +1

    I like it

  • @zhengsng6203
    @zhengsng6203 2 роки тому +11

    Most strongest Air Force in the world : U.S.A.F.
    The 2nd strongest Air Force in the world : U.S.N

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch Рік тому

      Yes. I saw that crap on American TV. Typical americal lies and propaganda. And some people blindly believe in that without even trying to check that information. Russia is second largest Air force in the world and in some aspects is first even if you add USN and USAF.

    • @chitownlivingston7007
      @chitownlivingston7007 Рік тому

      Disagree... 1. CIA & US Space Force. Who knows what they have (see TR3B... ua-cam.com/video/lSGLBb3k80U/v-deo.html)? Something had to replace the SR-71 Blackbird! 2. USAF 3. USN

  • @rchung9408
    @rchung9408 2 роки тому +43

    Strength of a navy doesn't depend on number of ships only....

    • @OneHeroTV
      @OneHeroTV 2 роки тому +12

      America owns the sea

    • @newhope5729
      @newhope5729 2 роки тому +12

      @@OneHeroTV That's why it can't end Chinese dominance on South China Sea

    • @henriksandstrom2161
      @henriksandstrom2161 2 роки тому +4

      @@newhope5729 yes American owes the sea

    • @voidwalker9223
      @voidwalker9223 2 роки тому

      @@newhope5729 so do you want them to try? because there will be nuclear warheads flying over your house and radiation all over the globe.
      Everyone wants to talk about war until its actually time for war

    • @newhope5729
      @newhope5729 2 роки тому

      @@voidwalker9223 Good attempt, but you cannot defend the poor show put up by the US!! Literally a joke they've become....... Especially after the change of leadership

  • @selvakumari1686
    @selvakumari1686 2 роки тому

    Super

  • @masako-je4cu
    @masako-je4cu 2 місяці тому +1

    Japan, Britain, and the United States are supposed to be the world's three largest navies.

  • @yusufmartapura6702
    @yusufmartapura6702 3 роки тому +10

    Keren keren kapalnya 👍

  • @vaishaliborkar5570
    @vaishaliborkar5570 2 роки тому +3

    India has 3 Minesweeper’s
    Now Indian Navy get’s new 1 scorpion class submarine

    • @noncekilla8848
      @noncekilla8848 2 роки тому +1

      U.K. = Dreadnaught class neculear submarine are the best in the world

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 2 роки тому +1

      @@noncekilla8848 shut the full cup

    • @Uzbek420
      @Uzbek420 Рік тому

      @@noncekilla8848 lol

  • @riddler2222
    @riddler2222 Рік тому +1

    US also has 17 Ticonderoga Cruisers not mentioned.

  • @leokal1237
    @leokal1237 2 роки тому +2

    03:15 East India Comp. ... Jack Sparrow left the chat

  • @islamforall7550
    @islamforall7550 3 роки тому +5

    भारतीय नेवी ७ स्थान पर हैं । 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @johnkennedy1931
    @johnkennedy1931 3 роки тому +24

    Um quadro impolgante de guerreiros transforma as espadas em relhas de arado. Pôde um homem condicionado a produzir algo diferente? O êxito e respostas demonstra a incompatibilidade e êxito!
    Cuidar da terra e Tomar conta dela é outro tipo de atitude.

  • @user-in9cr1wv8v
    @user-in9cr1wv8v 2 роки тому +35

    Я был бы счастлив, если бы все нави всех стран пару лет не играли попусту мышцами а прибирали плстмассу в океане. Вот это НАВИ и ГОРДОСТЬ!!!!!!!

  • @Villarreal863
    @Villarreal863 2 роки тому +3

    I think the Spanish navy is missing from this list

  • @narayanankutty9236
    @narayanankutty9236 2 роки тому +3

    All major international Defence media places Indian Navy in 4th position. So the positioning is seems to be incorrect.

  • @yatishyelgulwar6597
    @yatishyelgulwar6597 2 роки тому +21

    Indian navy was not founded by the East Indian company .....but Kanoji Angre.....the great Maratha naval admiral......who is the father of naval maritime who ,even East Indian company could not achieve in its life time .....

  • @colcornish5704
    @colcornish5704 4 місяці тому

    Heart of oak are our ships, heart of oak are our men; We always are ready, steady, boys, steady!

  • @HappyGM-R
    @HappyGM-R Рік тому

    I love how the thumbnail looks so photoshopped but it isn’t lol

  • @ENGBriseB
    @ENGBriseB 2 роки тому +11

    After the MP committee. 14th Dec 2021 "We're going to need a bigger Navy," Obviously what's happening in Ukraine the Royal Navy does need new ships. And Aircraft carriers fully loaded. Hopefully now they can start building them sooner rather than later.

  • @richardgt4100
    @richardgt4100 2 роки тому +21

    It makes little difference the number of navy personnel.. modern ships are designed now to minimize the number of men on board should they be hit

  • @user-rj8yp8ko6w
    @user-rj8yp8ko6w 3 роки тому

    오 영상 잘찍네

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 2 роки тому +1

    I like this strong forces

  • @C1Soldy
    @C1Soldy 3 роки тому +4

    I like this

  • @landusagemistymoorneighbor5230

    Chinese PLAN Surface vessel: 3 aircraft carriers: No.16 Liaoning 65000 tons, No 17. Shandong 65000 tons, No 18. Fujian 85000; 3 Helicopter Carriers: No. 031 Hainan 40000 tons, No. 032 Guangxi 40000 tons, 033 Anhui 40000 tons; 9 Dock Landing Ships: type 072A 25000 tons; (Aegis Air Defense System type) 39 New Destroyers: 8 type 055 12600 tons, 6 type 052C 6500 tons, 25 type 052D/DL 7500 tons; 11 Old destroyers: 1 type 051B 6600 tons, 2 type 051C 7300 tons, 2 type 052 4500 tons, 2 type 052B 6200 tons, 4 Russian type 956 updated 8500 tons; 33 Frigates: 2 type 054 3900 tons, 31 type 054A 4200 tons; 50 Corvettes: type 056A 1500 tons.

  • @arechchoubusa7267
    @arechchoubusa7267 3 роки тому +1

    Wow

  • @stanlefort8584
    @stanlefort8584 2 роки тому +1

    Interesting to know how the sorting is made ?????

  • @lszujo73
    @lszujo73 3 роки тому +82

    US Navy is just on a totally different level compared to the rest

    • @union310
      @union310 3 роки тому +12

      Yes , they are useless

    • @JR-jk5wz
      @JR-jk5wz 3 роки тому +6

      @union So is your country!

    • @union310
      @union310 3 роки тому +6

      @@JR-jk5wz Considering mine had the largest empire in the world, wasn't scared to take on two world wars whilst others watched. We ended slavery , we gave the world the industrial revolution and so much more. What did yours do?

    • @JR-jk5wz
      @JR-jk5wz 3 роки тому +3

      @@union310 NEVERMIND Union didn’t read your response correctly! I thought you meant we USA are useless! 🤣🙌🏻

    • @union310
      @union310 3 роки тому +2

      @@JR-jk5wz The USa is useless , it is built upon lies.
      Your schools teach about the war of independence yet your universities acknowledge if Britain wasn't at war with most of the EU at the same time Britain would have never left america, yes that is right left. They left to fight the two amassing fleets from spain and france that threatened the very seat of home.
      You also never mention that Britain marched across america with a few divisions after that and burned down your civic buildings and seat of power.
      Then theres the hollywood re write , the enigma machine , fury etc. Etc. Your whole country is built upon a lie. Research just those two to see that . Then there is the internet another american attempt at a re write. The world has no respect for you , your presidents have been a joke and a few dictators have you by your pants. You never have or ever will be an empire.
      To top things off ,you are the most racist country on earth.
      Then the statue of liberty , what a joke! That great symbol of American independence. Yet it was the Freemasons who paid for that , it wasn't a gift from france like you believe. Two masons in a pub decided to make it. Then they funded it through collecting cash in lodges and later in raffles. The only part america had to play was to make a foundation and they didn't even manage that . The stone had to come from Britain with British masonic money because americans didn't want it.

  • @nyanko_dearu5125
    @nyanko_dearu5125 3 роки тому +17

    🎌❤️

  • @ozfrancis2445
    @ozfrancis2445 Рік тому +2

    Why don't you mention that 65% of the US Naval fleet will be due for retirement very soon and after that where does it leave US as a maritime naval power?

  • @Ashleymaul
    @Ashleymaul 2 роки тому +1

    I find it weird that almost every Navy has a thing for the classic dress whites, how come of every military force we still look like cartoon characters in cute sailor uniforms

  • @ramal5708
    @ramal5708 2 роки тому +4

    For annual 680+ billion dollars budget get you on top of the list

  • @tv9944
    @tv9944 3 роки тому +5

    반갑습니다. 영상잘보고갑니다.
    늘건강하시고 유투브도 승승장구하시길 응원합니다.👍

  • @1987phillybilly
    @1987phillybilly Рік тому

    Lets see what the Constellation class brings to the table for the world

  • @joo9385
    @joo9385 2 роки тому +2

    💪🏻🖤☝🏻Destroyed Egyptian Navy

  • @NorthCamZ
    @NorthCamZ 3 роки тому +18

    some of these rankings make zero sense lol

  • @barabbasrosebud9282
    @barabbasrosebud9282 2 роки тому +7

    Strange, if you add up all the US Navy ships by class you get only 223.

    • @rayjames6096
      @rayjames6096 2 роки тому +2

      Add up any of the figures for any country on this list and it doesn't match the total number because they only list certain types of ships.

    • @mrschuyler
      @mrschuyler Рік тому

      True, but that under counts the total because of so many support ships. These are not in the "official" count and are not "USS" ships, but "USNS" ships that are considered "auxiliary" vessels run by the Military Sealift Command and similar groups. An example is the fast command support ships, designated "AOE". There is one accompanying every Carrier Strike Group. There are about 130 of these ships not counted in this video. There are also several dozen ships in the "Ready Reserve Fleet."

  • @lucaandreacolombo2710
    @lucaandreacolombo2710 3 роки тому +2

    Sorry but how could it be that a country without carriers is ranked higher than one who does. This is completely inconsistent

  • @sabrishabedini8318
    @sabrishabedini8318 2 роки тому +1

    Bravo tajvan😁😁😁

  • @Natk0
    @Natk0 2 роки тому +5

    This top is based on the number of ships? So why is the UK ahead of France and India when it has far fewer ships and a navy that is not really as powerful as it was a few decades ago ? Its only advantage is to have two aircraft carriers. Even if it's useful, I have a hard time seeing how it can make a navy much more efficient than these two competitors with twice as many ships. (Especially since France has 3 Helicopters carriers). If someone can explain it to me, so that I can understand it better, thank you.

    • @mywayorthe7198
      @mywayorthe7198 Рік тому

      Naval power is generally equated by tonnage. The French have a lot of small craft, patrol boats etc. It looks good on paper to have more hardware but it is how effective it would be in a naval encounter.

  • @manfredgedeik3124
    @manfredgedeik3124 2 роки тому +24

    The US Military has Machine shops too, ( plus over 18,000 CNC non military machine shops in the U.S.) If needed, the Military could give them work.

    • @josephguo6256
      @josephguo6256 Рік тому +1

      could the machine shops move to south china sea if needed and give them work?

    • @ParallelComparison
      @ParallelComparison Рік тому

      @@josephguo6256 China's navy is small fry. Would only take the US 7th fleet to wipeout China's entire navy and air force combine.

  • @manuellopezvazquez4834
    @manuellopezvazquez4834 2 роки тому +1

    Total tarde o temprano vamos todos para el mismo sitio ..y como soñe un dia con San Pedro ...todos seremos iguales ...jajajaaj me la voi a gozar

  • @xmilchellexdelarosa3042
    @xmilchellexdelarosa3042 Рік тому +42

    Ukraine : " Russian Navy Is The 3rd Strongest? "

    • @user-mo3eg3jt2o
      @user-mo3eg3jt2o Рік тому +14

      Афганистан: "сша первая армия мира?"😂😂😂

    • @ghakon684
      @ghakon684 Рік тому +4

      ​@@user-mo3eg3jt2o Афганистан: "ссср первая армия мира?"

    • @user-mo3eg3jt2o
      @user-mo3eg3jt2o Рік тому

      @@ghakon684 причём тут Союз? Его уже давно нет. Или у упоротых укросвиней до сих пор подгорает?🤣

    • @4King2005
      @4King2005 Рік тому +6

      vietnam: us is number 1 ?

    • @4King2005
      @4King2005 Рік тому +2

      ​@@ghakon684 ukraine was part of it

  • @GiuseppeMeledi
    @GiuseppeMeledi 2 роки тому +24

    for Italy we add the new aircraft carrier, or multi-role the TRIESTE Armament. Modification The unit features latest generation weapon systems. As regards the artillery sector, there are: 3 Otobreda 76/62 multirole cannons (two in the bow and one in the stern) of the Super Rapido MF Davide type, with guided ammunition and predisposition for the new Vulcano ammunition; 3 machine gun turrets with remote control OTO Melara 25/80 equipped with a 25 mm Oerlikon KBA cannon (25x137mm); 2 OTO Melara ODLS-20 rocket launchers for launching underwater and aerial deceivers (electronic lures). The missile sector, on the other hand, includes: provision for 4 vertical launchers (VLS Sylver) with 8 cells (two forward and two aft) for a total capacity of 32 Aster 15/30 missiles [12]. The sensor section will also boast very advanced technologies: PAR SPN-720, precision approach radar, 3D volumetric system capable of tracking 300 tracks and 12 targets simultaneously, range over 200 km; Radar Kronos Power Shield (AESA in L band), a multifunction surveillance system, with a range of 1 500-2 000 km; IFF SIR-M-PA, secondary radar for the identification of ships and aircraft; Kronos dual band radar (DBR AESA 4FF): C band (Kronos Quad - Fitted For) and X band (Kronos StarFire); TACAN AN-553 / N, for precision approaches and sending information to aircraft in flight; EWS "Zeus" system, developed by Elettronica SpA, equipped with an extremely powerful based on solid state TRX GaN modules. The electronic discovery component (EW) is integrated with a RESM (Radar Emission Interceptor), RECM (Radar Deceivers) and CESM (Radio Communications Interceptor) effective both in the high seas and in coastal waters, with a maritime surveillance and evaluation of the advanced situation through advanced ELINT and COMINT features, up to an innovative SEI algorithm; Automatic system for the direction of combat operations SADOC 4

    • @vincenzo9419
      @vincenzo9419 Рік тому

      So che l'Italia è uno stato fondatore NATO ma è meglio che la chiamiamo nave da crociera😉. non facciamoci scoprire forti e ben armati

    • @ernestobonanni5127
      @ernestobonanni5127 Місяць тому

      Too many details. That's no good.

  • @mixiglo
    @mixiglo 2 роки тому +17

    У кого лучшая космическая разведка и космическое оповещение, и кого больше гиперзвуковых ракет, тот и победит. Вот с этого надо было всё подсчитывать.

    • @user-fr8lo1ru8o
      @user-fr8lo1ru8o 2 роки тому +1

      Тут сравнивают флота, а не кто победит. Не путай теплое и мягкое

    • @user-zd1xq6ob7y
      @user-zd1xq6ob7y 2 роки тому +1

      Ты много Киселёва и скобаеву смотришь

    • @bgd414
      @bgd414 4 місяці тому

      Что такое "космическое оповещение"? Можешь сформулировать? Ну остальной бред даже комментировать стрёмно

  • @jjj__306
    @jjj__306 Рік тому +43

    I believe that the strength of the Navy is entirely determined by its submarine capabilities and anti-submarine capabilities. Isn't the United States and Japan, which have excellent anti-submarine capabilities and submarines, stronger than China and Russia?

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 Рік тому +7

      "you believe", well its not the truth. All capabilities are equally weighted.

    • @user-zj4mc7wf1h
      @user-zj4mc7wf1h Рік тому +12

      中国は置いといて、最近のロシアを見ていると海軍の整備や技術にちょっと疑問を覚える

    • @user-yx5gg9eb9d
      @user-yx5gg9eb9d Рік тому

      @@user-zj4mc7wf1h 不用谈 你只要知道他们有世界三大真理 能瞬间把你们从地球上抹去就行了

    • @cconghhong
      @cconghhong Рік тому

      @@user-zj4mc7wf1h China #1 intellectual theft😂😂

    • @alexmcinnes5930
      @alexmcinnes5930 Рік тому +4

      not true at all, submarines are much more vulnerable than you think, their good as long as there not detected, but if found can easily be targeted by things like anti- submarine warfare helicopters

  • @luke.morris.redfern-hardis9338
    @luke.morris.redfern-hardis9338 2 роки тому +16

    A good video, but it missed out several classes of warship. For example, the Russian battlecruisers, which are considered the biggest surface combat ships in the world and the main threat to American carrier groups. In addition, there is American cruisers which are larger than destroyers. They provide a command platform, as well as possessing very large numbers of anti ship missiles. Plus two of the helicopter carriers of the Japanese Navy are being converted into true aircraft carriers.

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 2 роки тому +1

      Light VTOL aircraft carriers. They wouldn't even have ski jumps. But yeah, the rest of JMSDF is pretty damn terrifying.

    • @mukundvashisht6226
      @mukundvashisht6226 2 роки тому +1

      Battlecruisers were retired after ww2, and they suck as they are big ass boats with big unreliable guns and very slow. It is a cruise missile paradise.
      Edit:
      ever thought why no one else uses it?

    • @dennismills6887
      @dennismills6887 Рік тому

      And Ukraine pretty much proved Russian battle cruisers are worthless

    • @Veiljustin83
      @Veiljustin83 Рік тому

      @@death_parade With the inclusion of F35B 5th Gen fighter planes, they don't need a runway or ski jumps to lift off.

    • @Veiljustin83
      @Veiljustin83 Рік тому

      Russian Navy have very old ships poorly maintained, When war breaks out, they aren't as reliable as you thought they are. See what happens to their Tanks in the invasion of Ukraine.

  • @lorenzopes9866
    @lorenzopes9866 3 роки тому +24

    Forza Italia 🇮🇹

  • @bradjames6748
    @bradjames6748 2 роки тому +6

    It's funny how far down Canada has fallen in ranking from 1960 when it had the 3rd largest navy in the world.....

    • @royalnavyrulebritannia5717
      @royalnavyrulebritannia5717 2 роки тому

      I never knew Canada had a big navy before

    • @minggus9649
      @minggus9649 2 роки тому +1

      That was only possible because the rest of the world was destroyed by the war so most of their efforts were in rebuilding. Canada has decent navy for its size rn

    • @keshimars
      @keshimars 2 роки тому

      canada doesnt even need a military cuz they are buddies with the us

  • @dwarkaprasadsharma646
    @dwarkaprasadsharma646 Рік тому +1

    भारतीय नेवी अगर एक फोर्ड कला या रूजवेल्ट क्लास एयरक्राफ्ट केरीयर का पूरा बेडा खरीद लेता है तो भारतीय नेवी दुसरे नम्बर की नेवी हो सकती है। और विशाल का कंस्ट्रक्शन को तेजी से करना चाहिए।

  • @Lita1
    @Lita1 Рік тому

    Mu hahahahaha OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO a new record is coming BAYBEEEEEEEEEE...I liked this video yes!!!! 👍😅

  • @torstenmuller9344
    @torstenmuller9344 3 роки тому +5

    1 china 777. 2 Russia 603. 3 Usa 490

  • @magoutdoorxtvt8972
    @magoutdoorxtvt8972 3 роки тому +9

    all this battleship will destroy our world one day.....

  • @user-oe5tc4jx5x
    @user-oe5tc4jx5x 2 роки тому +10

    The Japanese Navy will convert two Izumo types into aircraft carriers

  • @michaelmaxfield3744
    @michaelmaxfield3744 2 роки тому

    How many Navy personnel have seen
    a fellow crew member or civilian
    killed aboard ship?

  • @LJHuang-jn8bj
    @LJHuang-jn8bj 3 роки тому +10

    Not only quantity but also quality should be put to rank.

    • @TheFlyingMochi
      @TheFlyingMochi 3 роки тому +1

      If only quantity was considered, China would be way ahead of the US and any other country. Also, not only quality and quantity, but also availability is also very important. How many of those ships are full operational. This is the official ranking from “Military Today”. Not many complaints about it.

  • @Wolfen443
    @Wolfen443 3 роки тому +10

    Taiwan-84 ships, Italy-48 but more advanced?, South Korea-just over 100, India-just over 200, France-80 plus, UK-80? (Oh Dear), Japan-100 even (Too Few), Russia-250 plus!!, China-300 plus (and more coming), U.S.-200 only but the most advanced?. So the numbers of aircraft round them up, I see now. The whole combined modern fleets do not come close to the numbers of the combined fleets of WWII, but they are more modern in comparison.

    • @Michael-qt9bl
      @Michael-qt9bl 2 роки тому +3

      Yes of course, naturally. A single US Fleet could wipe out the entire Pacific Fleet of 1945 without a single sighting of the modern US fleet. That is how much more powerful the smaller more advanced Navy of today is.

    • @laurentquick5494
      @laurentquick5494 9 місяців тому

      Première flotte militaire au monde usa

  • @user-yn4ww8vn5d
    @user-yn4ww8vn5d 12 днів тому

    India can build 3rd generation navy aircraft carrier for next few years saying by Defense minister Rajnath Singh.. Jai Hind... 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @graeme9668
    @graeme9668 2 роки тому +4

    How does the Italian navy make this list. Every ship would have propellers, one forward and two to go in retreat.

  • @supernodream
    @supernodream 3 роки тому +18

    9:31 is not correct. China has 37 Destroyers in Service at this moment.
    Other 6* Type 055 and 7* Type 052D are still in sea trial.
    So the figure "50 destroyers" is only valid when all of them enter service.

    • @longmarch2668
      @longmarch2668 3 роки тому +4

      42 by the end of the year.

    • @charlesstepp2083
      @charlesstepp2083 2 роки тому +1

      China is a paper 🐅. Tai wan will leave the cccp grabbing their ass.

    • @user-by2wg3si3d
      @user-by2wg3si3d 2 роки тому +7

      @@charlesstepp2083 in your dream

    • @matinalipour1566
      @matinalipour1566 2 роки тому +2

      @@charlesstepp2083 آمریکا نیز کاغذ است و الا در جنگ های افغانستان و ویتنام شکست نمیخورد

    • @WateeroRoblox
      @WateeroRoblox Рік тому

      @@user-by2wg3si3d ??

  • @neusinhasouza3693
    @neusinhasouza3693 2 роки тому +15

    1. E.U.A.
    2. China
    3. Rússia
    4. Japão
    5. Reino Unido
    6. França
    7. Índia
    8. Coreia do Sul
    9. Italia
    10. Taiwan

    • @nurisengun4511
      @nurisengun4511 2 роки тому

      Turkey nerde.çin seddine bak.34 ülkede şehitligi olan ülke akdenizde abd den haraç alan tek ülke

  • @nasunoyoichi5253
    @nasunoyoichi5253 Рік тому

    You need to consider blue water navy capability.

  • @BMH1965
    @BMH1965 Рік тому

    Any navy with access to nuclear power has to placed above a non-nuclear navy, and a fully functioning modern navy has to be placed above a navy full of museum pieces (Russia).

  • @alexwong2618
    @alexwong2618 3 роки тому +3

    USA: NO 2-10 COME ON !

    • @piepile6328
      @piepile6328 3 роки тому +1

      But the USA has way better quality ships. Chinese ship are numerous but are made of sticks and glue😂

    • @brucemon4525
      @brucemon4525 2 роки тому

      @@piepile6328 True

  • @barrycharlessearle5253
    @barrycharlessearle5253 3 роки тому +5

    Taiwan section, The KIDD Class Destroyers never served in the UK Royal Navy

  • @dinocamo8110
    @dinocamo8110 2 роки тому

    Américans and alliés WE understad your play

  • @erichall297
    @erichall297 3 роки тому

    #1

  • @andrewfield8562
    @andrewfield8562 3 роки тому +29

    Funny how people only go on numbers and don't take into consideration the quality of ships equipment personnel training you'd take 1 royal marine over a hundred of another country

  • @ricrey2714
    @ricrey2714 2 роки тому +2

    Tudo o que está sobre as águas pode ir ao fundo.

  • @insomnia5462
    @insomnia5462 2 роки тому +1

    Only 4 Jin class and 2 shang,i think incorrect data.

  • @Rebell971
    @Rebell971 2 роки тому

    Cool gemacht wurden aber auch die 2 kreuzer /Schlachtkreuzer der Russischen marine berücksichtig wie die Nackimov oder wie die heißt

  • @user-dn7yn5tv7f
    @user-dn7yn5tv7f 2 роки тому +14

    今はF-35Bを発着できるよういずも型護衛艦2隻とも空母化改修工事をしています

  • @alfredip1151
    @alfredip1151 2 роки тому +27

    The only British dominance to the other countries in 2021 is the Strategic nuclear submarine. Their destroyers are being repaired, only one of them is in service. And there are not enough f35 for their carriers. Therefore they must lean on the American military support. And British naval strength Has been overstated

    • @user-qg5uv5ji5m
      @user-qg5uv5ji5m 2 роки тому +2

      Embarrassed Queen.

    • @himbisaquatics
      @himbisaquatics 2 роки тому +9

      You are wrong, they are not over stated unlike the other navies that reach 100-700 assets listed. It's because the royal auxiliary fleet are not included. In other navies their auxiliary fleet are listed among their navy assets. And also the size of navy depends on tonnage and quality not quantity.

    • @camhunt7310
      @camhunt7310 2 роки тому +7

      We have loads of f35s in order but the yanks are slow builders. The UK is currently building 4 new nuckear missile submarines, 3 atack submarines, 18 frigates and loads more.

    • @ENGBriseB
      @ENGBriseB 2 роки тому

      At the moment the Royal Navy is getting future generations of warships built. By 2030 24 modern Frigates and destroyers. And new nuclear submarines are all ordered.

    • @rayjames6096
      @rayjames6096 2 роки тому +3

      @@camhunt7310 The UK picks the delivery time for their F-35s. It is their schedule. They will receive the final of the remaining 24 they have on order at the end of 2025. Australia has more F-35s than the UK right now.

  • @sayidmhaiqal1189
    @sayidmhaiqal1189 2 роки тому

    Talk about the air force please...

  • @namefamilyname1029
    @namefamilyname1029 2 роки тому +1

    top 10 best infantry !

    • @simonelsey
      @simonelsey 2 роки тому +2

      brits be top .... less in numbers but what ever regiment still equal or above other countries elite forces , Not up with most countries special forces but British special forces are up above the rest

  • @michaellou7101
    @michaellou7101 3 роки тому +18

    Wrong...china already has one 075 heli carrier on duty and another 7 coming along. The 055 cruisers are at least 8. Two are already in service, the Nanchang and the Lhasa....

    • @lamarsidoner3250
      @lamarsidoner3250 2 роки тому +2

      THERE NAVY IS NOT A PROVEN NACY AT ALL,,,HOPEFULLY THERE WILL BE NO WAR , IF THERE IS , I AM AFFRAID THAT THERE WILL BE A NUKE WAR,,,SAY BYE BYE

    • @zobenny8290
      @zobenny8290 Рік тому +1

      快说那是用来打鱼的 😂

  • @kerisnarao754
    @kerisnarao754 2 роки тому +6

    India's Naval strength is under estimated.

    • @michaelj.jordan1732
      @michaelj.jordan1732 2 роки тому +2

      It's actually overated...

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 2 роки тому

      @@michaelj.jordan1732 The Indian Navy should be at no. 5. This ranking is just like...10 years too old. lol

    • @bhavikjadhav3067
      @bhavikjadhav3067 2 роки тому

      But indian navy really need to step up there game

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 2 роки тому

      @@bhavikjadhav3067 year 2027 -
      Uk+France together - 3 Carriers, 34 Destroyers/Frigates, 21 Submarines, 0 Corvettes.
      India alone - 2 Carriers, 37 Destroyers/Frigates, 24 Submarines , 24 Corvettes.
      Beat that. lol

    • @bhavikjadhav3067
      @bhavikjadhav3067 2 роки тому

      @@rohitb5834 but what happens when indian and Chinese navy(major threat for india right now) come face to face

  • @felicitoadaro7495
    @felicitoadaro7495 Рік тому

    ok go strong go

  • @ulikemyname6744
    @ulikemyname6744 2 роки тому +2

    The Russian and the US navies are the only navies that have Cruisers.

  • @hlew2694
    @hlew2694 3 роки тому +11

    9:40 I believe this photo is not Chinese navy

    • @get4084
      @get4084 2 роки тому +2

      You are right... That's the Thai Navy

  • @emyrdaviesakataff4766
    @emyrdaviesakataff4766 Рік тому +4

    No US ships have ever been procured, bought or served in the Royal Navy, we have always built our own ships.

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor Рік тому +1

      Uh...you never hear of "destroyers for bases" deal in WWII? lol

    • @whuvir
      @whuvir Рік тому

      @@SelfProclaimedEmperor 😀👍

  • @mansorosir5878
    @mansorosir5878 2 роки тому +5

    The West and East naval doctrine are different. You cant compare apple and orange

  • @PeterJackson-dr4pm
    @PeterJackson-dr4pm Рік тому

    These ships never served in the Royal Navy. They were offered to the Royal Australian Navy, but the deal fell through. They only served in US Navy before Taiwan bought them.