The type grid is an amazing guide to understanding people in general. It helps me every single day! A million thank yous wouldn't be enough to express my appreciation of Chase for putting this information out there.
I’ve looked at it practically daily for like 5 years now or so 😂 insanely handy & yes always giving credit where credit is due! Can never thank you enough!!
What are some cognitive orbit sayings? When I see ... I remember... (Se Si) Se primary Why would you want ... I want (Ne Ni) Ni primary When they feel sad, it makes me cry (Fe Fi) Fi primary I when I hear you say ... I think ... (Te Ti) Te primary Wayfarer Quadra
13:06 that whiteboard negative (inverse) type grid cannot be right-- an INFP for example is "Informative, Responding, Outcome" An INFP should have no: "Direct, Initiating, Movement" but that isn't what's written. Could you confirm that it is just written incorrectly?
The four types that are written there are 4 sides of the mind. ISTP, ENFJ, ESTJ, INFP- none of those 4 types is a finisher type. But I don't know how to use that- you would probably need to recognise when you use those four types.
I’m still having a hard time distinguishing between direct and informative. Mainly because each communication style can be used depending on the context of the situation, whom you’re speaking to, etc. I’ve recognized that I’ve used forms of direct communication and informative communication throughout my life, as have others around me. How do you determine which one is someone’s authentic communication style?
I want to suggest something. I request plz make these videos of around 15mins. These are too long🙃. What if i want to know something specific do i have to scroll through 1hr video to know that🥲? That's not efficient. Plz take this into consideration and thanku for ur hard work.
This is cool but also hilarious necause I am absolutely an INFJ whom was birthed from an INTP grown from systemic analysis from an intp seed who easily flexes to intj or Infp and on occasion enfp. You have a point but your axis concept is way off. Imagine thinking anything precedes the preference for internal or external processing...
I think you are Ti child with an intellectual god complex whose Te trickster/Si demon makes you think you know and understand Jungian and MBTI but you have no idea
To be clear my cognitive orbit is introverted understanding- intp infj intj infp in the least likely if scenarios equal to my entp. Presentation this dude saw some brass in the fringe and thought he could polish. The suggestions here just don't add up.
Guardians all have SJ meaning they all have strong Si. Artisans all have SP indicating strong Se. Why do people lump all NF and NT together when there is no specific function that the combination is referring to? All they have in common is superficial traits. And if that's how you are gonna organize things then it should be SF and ST as their own categories instead of SJ and SP. The lack of consistency is frustrating and confusing. Not a single function in common between ENTJ and INTP yet they are lumped together despite such massive differences.
Blud if you actually looked at the patterns of NTs and NFS you would see that literally every NT has Ni/Ne and Ti/te as their top 2 functions making them intuitive THINKERS and NFS literally have Ne/Ni and fi/fe as their top 2 functions making them intuitive FEELERS
@@Luca_683 ok and if you look at every SF and ST type you will see the same pattern. All SF are Fe/Fi and Se/Si in their top 2 functions. All ST are Se/Si and Te/Ti in their top 2 functions. Would you care to elaborate why the categories revolve around J and P for sensors and T and F for intuitives? Why is it not SF ST NF NT? Or if we are going by 2nd and 4th as in the case of SJ guardians and SP artisans why aren't the categories for intuitives NP and NJ? You seem to have missed the whole inconsistency I was pointing out.
@@Iron-Blurr when it comes to placing the types in temperaments you have to also think about the interaction styles which were derived from how the functions express themselves in each type for example esfj and isfj can’t be in the same temperament as esfp and isfp because 2 are affiliative while the other 2 are pragmatic which would make it messy so for sensors they just made all sjs affiliative,have si as their top 2 and that they are j types (which is wrong because isfj and istj are actually P types) and they formed all sps with the same process of them having se as their top 2 and them being pragmatic
Ive been watching some of your typing famous people videos. Something i have trouble with understanding is the difference between systematic and movement. Cos at one point youll say ‘this is a process’ and put a tick under movement and then at another point, youll say the same thing and put a point under systematic. Really loved the game of thrones typing video. Where can i find more fictional typing videos?
Intrest (what's in it for me) vs systematic (what system is being used to make choices) movement (fast process) vs control ( slower focused on an outcome)
@@chodey1314 I think process meaning execution and improvise along the way (it's the way people act, action style when doing something). System is about the interaction between points in the system (it's the way people think, judgement style when decide something).
The type grid is an amazing guide to understanding people in general. It helps me every single day! A million thank yous wouldn't be enough to express my appreciation of Chase for putting this information out there.
I’ve looked at it practically daily for like 5 years now or so 😂 insanely handy & yes always giving credit where credit is due! Can never thank you enough!!
Slingshot comparisson was so 👌
The type grid is a great system. We love your videos 👍
I feel my typing is upgraded watching this.
50:44 - If you want to identify someone's type then go for their gateway functions.
111! 😁
I want to know more about how people deal with a fear of comfort. But I don't hear people talking about it very much.
Always appreciate the approach you take as a teacher of Jungian psychology, Chase.
What's the name of that book you mentioned at 1:03:17?
Who is the author?
What are some cognitive orbit sayings?
When I see ... I remember... (Se Si) Se primary
Why would you want ... I want (Ne Ni) Ni primary
When they feel sad, it makes me cry (Fe Fi) Fi primary
I when I hear you say ... I think ... (Te Ti) Te primary
Wayfarer Quadra
13:06 that whiteboard negative (inverse) type grid cannot be right-- an INFP for example is "Informative, Responding, Outcome"
An INFP should have no: "Direct, Initiating, Movement" but that isn't what's written. Could you confirm that it is just written incorrectly?
The four types that are written there are 4 sides of the mind. ISTP, ENFJ, ESTJ, INFP- none of those 4 types is a finisher type. But I don't know how to use that- you would probably need to recognise when you use those four types.
@@enlightenedglass7879 ISTP is a finisher type
I’m still having a hard time distinguishing between direct and informative. Mainly because each communication style can be used depending on the context of the situation, whom you’re speaking to, etc. I’ve recognized that I’ve used forms of direct communication and informative communication throughout my life, as have others around me. How do you determine which one is someone’s authentic communication style?
Direct= bossy
Informative = shy
Just got to the path about your ex. Your not an analyst your a . ....cist.
Great work dude!
I want to suggest something. I request plz make these videos of around 15mins. These are too long🙃. What if i want to know something specific do i have to scroll through 1hr video to know that🥲? That's not efficient. Plz take this into consideration and thanku for ur hard work.
This is cool but also hilarious necause I am absolutely an INFJ whom was birthed from an INTP grown from systemic analysis from an intp seed who easily flexes to intj or Infp and on occasion enfp. You have a point but your axis concept is way off. Imagine thinking anything precedes the preference for internal or external processing...
I think you are Ti child with an intellectual god complex whose Te trickster/Si demon makes you think you know and understand Jungian and MBTI but you have no idea
@@dxfifa and I think you are just child welcome to the world seed
To be clear my cognitive orbit is introverted understanding- intp infj intj infp in the least likely if scenarios equal to my entp. Presentation this dude saw some brass in the fringe and thought he could polish. The suggestions here just don't add up.
Guardians all have SJ meaning they all have strong Si.
Artisans all have SP indicating strong Se.
Why do people lump all NF and NT together when there is no specific function that the combination is referring to? All they have in common is superficial traits. And if that's how you are gonna organize things then it should be SF and ST as their own categories instead of SJ and SP.
The lack of consistency is frustrating and confusing.
Not a single function in common between ENTJ and INTP yet they are lumped together despite such massive differences.
Blud if you actually looked at the patterns of NTs and NFS you would see that literally every NT has Ni/Ne and Ti/te as their top 2 functions making them intuitive THINKERS and NFS literally have Ne/Ni and fi/fe as their top 2 functions making them intuitive FEELERS
Baffles me how u missed that simple connection or pattern
@@Luca_683 ok and if you look at every SF and ST type you will see the same pattern.
All SF are Fe/Fi and Se/Si in their top 2 functions.
All ST are Se/Si and Te/Ti in their top 2 functions.
Would you care to elaborate why the categories revolve around J and P for sensors and T and F for intuitives?
Why is it not SF ST NF NT?
Or if we are going by 2nd and 4th as in the case of SJ guardians and SP artisans why aren't the categories for intuitives NP and NJ?
You seem to have missed the whole inconsistency I was pointing out.
@@Iron-Blurr when it comes to placing the types in temperaments you have to also think about the interaction styles which were derived from how the functions express themselves in each type for example esfj and isfj can’t be in the same temperament as esfp and isfp because 2 are affiliative while the other 2 are pragmatic which would make it messy so for sensors they just made all sjs affiliative,have si as their top 2 and that they are j types (which is wrong because isfj and istj are actually P types) and they formed all sps with the same process of them having se as their top 2 and them being pragmatic
@@Iron-Blurr NTs are also grouped together because they are all pragmatic while NFS are all affiliative by nature
47:25 - Fear can lead to violence
Are there any videos where chase breaks down temperaments and interactions in speech like he did for the cognitive functions/axis in season 18
Ive been watching some of your typing famous people videos. Something i have trouble with understanding is the difference between systematic and movement. Cos at one point youll say ‘this is a process’ and put a tick under movement and then at another point, youll say the same thing and put a point under systematic.
Really loved the game of thrones typing video. Where can i find more fictional typing videos?
Intrest (what's in it for me) vs systematic (what system is being used to make choices) movement (fast process) vs control ( slower focused on an outcome)
The words system and process both just mean a way of doing something. So i still dont know what the distinction between systematic and movement is.
@@chodey1314 I think process meaning execution and improvise along the way (it's the way people act, action style when doing something). System is about the interaction between points in the system (it's the way people think, judgement style when decide something).