The Type Best at Reading People Is... | CS Joseph responds

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 чер 2023
  • Discover your personality type free: www.udja.app/
    CS Joseph Responds to the Acolyte monthly member question which type is the best at reading people.
    Learn to overcome your fears and unlock your potential: egohackingyourfear.com/
    Learn to type others by text: egohackingbytext.com/
    Was this video impactful for you? Buy me a coffee! ko-fi.com/csjoseph
    Test, Blog, UA-cam, Coaching, Member, and Discord links: linktr.ee/csjoseph
    Psychoanalyzing and video games collide:
    / csj0s3ph
    Get the solution to bad psychology when it comes to sales and marketing here: ultimatemessagingformula.com
    Prefer to listen? Find audio versions here:
    anchor.fm/csjoseph
    Intro: Prismo (Stronger) NoCopyright Sound ncs.io/Stronger
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 450

  • @Eden25
    @Eden25 10 місяців тому +26

    Not me dying of anxiety with the dude that just sat next to you
    🤣🤣🤣

    • @knightninja8714
      @knightninja8714 Місяць тому +1

      For real! It's low key making me nervous too.

  • @wonderwend1
    @wonderwend1 Рік тому +109

    It fascinates me how you can sit and explain such a complicated subject yet look totally distracted by your surroundings.

    • @susanrodriquez3757
      @susanrodriquez3757 Рік тому

      NTPs are used to being constantly distracted so they learn over time how to deal with it. They wouldn’t be able to survive otherwise.

    • @caleblechler8929
      @caleblechler8929 Рік тому +24

      NTP moment

    • @k0j747
      @k0j747 Рік тому +9

      Because its not complicated for him.

    • @mid0rina
      @mid0rina Рік тому +7

      NTP autism

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +6

      another an INTP can confirm.

  • @avasava7720
    @avasava7720 11 місяців тому +21

    No way people actually thought INTJs were some of the best people readers.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Місяць тому +1

      Thought reader and thought control? yes.
      Reading people? No.
      Because poepe aren't just consist of only thought.

    • @etherspin
      @etherspin Місяць тому

      INFJ with some INTJ close buddies.
      They seem to channel insights straight into task based logistics rather than making a conclusion about a person's character or emotions

    • @francisanand8049
      @francisanand8049 3 дні тому

      ​@@etherspin that's just a myth bro

  • @sylviaowega3839
    @sylviaowega3839 Рік тому +29

    I know that as an INTP myself, I know immediately when someone doesn’t like; -and believe me there’s lots a people feel that way about me. It used to bother me a lot in the past, but I just learned to accept it.

    • @00Klingon
      @00Klingon 10 місяців тому

      Shadow focused INTP's are naturally suspicious of the intentions of others due to past experience (Si) informing future possibilities (Ne) and a natural inclination to take what others say with a grain of salt (Te nemesis). Walling off Fe to protect it, allows for the emotional distance needed to more objectively assess someone's behavior. The weakness being Se trickster where we can't really be sure what we saw was real and fool ourselves.

  • @Scarecrow1410
    @Scarecrow1410 Рік тому +41

    For all the people asking who the worst ones are, he mentioned INTJ is one of the worst and I can concur. Fe trickster is a constant kick in the nards and when paired with Se inferior is why we’re never around. It’s the worst.

    • @TokyoTaisu
      @TokyoTaisu Рік тому +1

      ikr

    • @mrod8578
      @mrod8578 Рік тому +2

      Batman ninja vanish! 😂

    • @alekskopysov7357
      @alekskopysov7357 Рік тому

      Sadly Putin is an INTJ and we se how it can go sometime in the world. He has a lot of incompetent and dishonest people around him who lie and help him find wrong decisions.

    • @pingz2454
      @pingz2454 Рік тому +5

      I think it's the lack of Ne for INTJs, ISTJs also lack Fe but are pretty good at reading peaple' intentions .

    • @mrod8578
      @mrod8578 Рік тому +11

      @@pingz2454 Actually the problem for INTJs isn't Ne. They can actually dip into Ne over time and become quite competent with the function (Ne is their 5th slot). The problem with INTJs is Fe blindspot where they don't understand the feelings, emotions, or intentions of others. This means they can unknowingly alienate others (or even sometimes an entire group) which can lead to even further misunderstanding where they can be a black sheep.
      INTJs thereby become completely misunderstood themselves where people will see them as completely narcissistic, self aggrandizing, selfish, etc. INTJs can also become quite paranoid due to this especially in regards to trust (aka Batman). Having Fe blindspot is a difficult cognitive function to work around when dealing with people.
      I think this is part of what leads INTJs to become master minds with their talents and abilities. It's literally so they can survive amongst people. They turn a weakness into a strength by working around it using their mind to overcome their weakness in regards to social zeitgeists (which lacking Fe is a major challenge to them). There are cases where they become so good they can turn from a black sheep into a swan. It's actually quite impressive when they are able to accomplish that when they are blind to Fe.

  • @melino9709
    @melino9709 Рік тому +4

    Amazing question!!!!!! Whoever asked thanks I’ve been pondering this questing for the longest….

  • @therapist_theminus
    @therapist_theminus Рік тому +16

    I think the best type to understand people would be an INFP (apart from INTP) because with Si enrichment and Fi being a great judge with time. A person is sum total of his emotions and INFP being reader of emotions can easily read people. I've been typing and reading people accurately just by seeing faces or reading paragraphs or voice.

    • @choco1199
      @choco1199 Рік тому +5

      Infps are too subjective because of fi im guessing lol

    • @icingcake
      @icingcake 7 місяців тому

      That was my guess as well

    • @bawbaw1228
      @bawbaw1228 6 місяців тому +1

      Are you joking ?

    • @kimngandong
      @kimngandong 4 місяці тому

      I don't know about INFP but as an ENFP, I have always been superb at reading people thanks to my Ne hero, Si inferior and Fi parent, which is a strong function for moral judgment. My ability to read people has saved me a lot of time due to not wasting time on those who are up to no good.

  • @ninjapandathethird6241
    @ninjapandathethird6241 Рік тому +33

    90 year old ENTP

    • @bradeye1133
      @bradeye1133 Рік тому +5

      Damn, any wisdom i could use?

    • @iamyou3080
      @iamyou3080 Рік тому

      That’s awesome!!

    • @Persephone44
      @Persephone44 Рік тому +1

      @JTheSnitch 😹

    • @Persephone44
      @Persephone44 Рік тому

      Jthesnitch: love it even more how she deleted her comment after getting roasting by you. ❄️ 😂 😂 😂 ❄️

  • @romscar77
    @romscar77 Рік тому +19

    Depends on if an INTP cares or not

    • @mrod8578
      @mrod8578 Рік тому +7

      True. If they are in apathy mode or truly don't care they will not be that observant. They are observant and good about reading people when they are interested. Hot or cold, On or off,, Ones and zeros.

    • @PJLJ47
      @PJLJ47 4 місяці тому

      No it doesn't. It depends if they are paying attention to what a person is doing.

  • @timmwahl7097
    @timmwahl7097 Рік тому +28

    What about the INFP or INFJ? I'm an ENTP and spent a lot of time with an INFP. They have an interesting insight into people, that can be very accurate

    • @qasimimtiaz9668
      @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +10

      infps are good at collecting data.

    • @TheBittenBullet
      @TheBittenBullet Рік тому +12

      As an INFP, I find that my reads on people are vague and malleable. They usually have little regard for objectivity and seem more interested in stimulating my imagination.
      In a sense, my mind intentionally distorts my reads to make them more interesting to me. It's actually difficult for me to distinguish between authentic impressions of people and the imaginings they stimulate. My mind is too distracted by the latter to trust the accuracy of the former.
      Bottom line: I basically see everyone as potential characters in a book, or as clues to the mystery of humanity.
      For example, an INFP might have an "interesting" insight into someone, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's "accurate". It could be accurate, but deep down I just don't care if it's accurate to reality.
      And as weird as it might sound, I don't really care about reality in general. I know that I should, but that's easier said than done. The real world is just one of many worlds my mind visits.

    • @kyurei4478
      @kyurei4478 Рік тому +8

      I didn't want to give the impression that INFJs want to show off or anything and I actually think ENTPs are quite good at reading people, but if I force myself to look at it with as most objectivity as I can, I don't see a better type on paper to read people over than INFJ. This combination of Ni, Fe and Ti in this precise order is the best to read people I think. It's people focused at the largest scale. ENFJs can have the problem that they jump too fast to a conclusion because of Ti inferior, even though when it connects with dominant Fe it can give surprising results. But Ni allows to create more detailed possibilities than Ne, Fe is constantly used as a tool function to interact with people and gives enough social awareness that is vital for INFJs to adapt to the world and Ti child is more mature than ENFJ's Ti and prevents the INFJs from jumping to conclusions and regulates the strong Ni insights by seeking for more informations and collecting more datas to draw conclusions. And I think truly reading people as a person isn't only about pragmatism but also specifics.

    • @timmwahl7097
      @timmwahl7097 Рік тому +2

      @@kyurei4478 Very interesting points, and I agree with pretty much all of it except that Ni is better than Ne in reading people. Ne is outwardly focused, so it can see the possibilities for other people more clearly, whereas Ni can show you how your own future will unveil. Another thing with Ti child is that INFJs can be very unaware if what others are thinking (Te trickster), which is a part of reading people. The way of reading is very different from the ENTP, so it's difficult to compare

    • @timmwahl7097
      @timmwahl7097 Рік тому +2

      @@TheBittenBullet That makes a lot of sense. The INFP I know always has very foggy readings of people (including myself) it seems she knows what's right but schizophrenia kicks in and she doesn't want to believe her intuition/feeling. That's a very interesting way in thinking about people though. Are you writing a book? :)

  • @33Jenesis
    @33Jenesis Рік тому +17

    I can’t say I am good at reading people (intp). However I do have an aversion to those who come on fast and or strong. They put me on guard immediately. The ones who play a long game I may fall prey. My go-to strategy has always been “time”. Give me enough time to listen and observe, alone or with a group, I can figure out if this person is trustworthy. Another principle is to never mix money with any relationship. I don’t invest in your get rich quick tip. I don’t cosign any loan. If I give you money at all, it is a gift not a loan.

    • @Coneman3
      @Coneman3 Рік тому +2

      Yes I don’t think INTP are great with other people. They prefer mental gymnastics.

    • @diotimamyrina
      @diotimamyrina Рік тому +4

      @@Coneman3 being good at reading people is very different from being good WITH people
      the first requires mental gymnastics
      high se for example is good WITH people but not very good at reading them.. I've had multiple se hero/parent types have a breakdown about not being able to read people
      same goes for high fe, although high fe is way better than se at reading people, especially if te isn't trickster
      enfjs are overall pretty good at reading people but they either don't know what to do with it or they do and become manipulative so they won't talk about it much either way
      intps just don't care about people, if they decide to actually care you get jung and linda berens

    • @mehdihassankhanloo5297
      @mehdihassankhanloo5297 5 місяців тому

      Yes, time, 'cause Si Child should get experienced to fuel Ne Parent to be able to see patterns in people's behavior and actions

  • @d.o.9072
    @d.o.9072 Рік тому +15

    Please forgive me for this but NTPs are good at predicting behavior if they are damaged in some way. Chase said it, it's a defense mechanisms thus the more they hurt you the more you analyze the human species behaviors like those of any other beast...

    • @minjoolee2231
      @minjoolee2231 Рік тому +6

      I am an INTP, and this is so true. The more experience and pain the Si has stored throughout life, the more useful Ne gets. Si is ultimately an engine to Ne.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +1

      ​@@minjoolee2231correct.

    • @sonja1020
      @sonja1020 Рік тому +6

      Not damaged. That is likely the wrong variable. Maybe a more accurate variable is survival. Survival & necessity are pressures that hone skills in the crucible of life, but they are not the only variables that can correlate to this ability. Not everything is because it is a defense mechanism. I find that I use it positively as well because I want to get ahead and optimize my life and have favorable outcomes.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +3

      ​@@sonja1020in this applied typological knowledge.. everything occur is because either defense mechanism or optimization of advantage. Only two variable working as a motive in the background and one goal of survival.

  • @alteredcatscyprus
    @alteredcatscyprus 8 місяців тому +8

    Enfp, hands down. It’s scary. They don’t miss a frickin trick.

    • @lastraven7205
      @lastraven7205 7 місяців тому +1

      why do you think this

    • @alteredcatscyprus
      @alteredcatscyprus 7 місяців тому

      It’s anecdotal, I guess. Just my experience. As somebody used to doing the reading, it blew my mind to have someone reading me. It was terrifying, actually. @@lastraven7205

    • @mehdihassankhanloo5297
      @mehdihassankhanloo5297 5 місяців тому

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @kimngandong
      @kimngandong 4 місяці тому

      @@lastraven7205 as an ENFP, I have always been superb at reading people thanks to my Ne hero, Si inferior and Fi parent, which is a strong function for moral judgment. My ability to read people has saved me a lot of time due to not wasting time on those who are up to no good.

    • @dxfifa
      @dxfifa 23 дні тому

      They are delusional and make up incorrect narratives that they act upon. But they are good at manipulation

  • @Coneman3
    @Coneman3 Рік тому +23

    The title question can be interpreted in different ways. INFJ are known to be best at reading people in terms of what is in that persons heart, but not reading people like the ENTP. We might not predict how you act as well as the ENTP, but we can see deeper into your soul.

    • @kyurei4478
      @kyurei4478 Рік тому

      To me an INFJ could read people the same way an ENTP could and vice versa, simply because of very similar function stack.

    • @avasava7720
      @avasava7720 11 місяців тому

      Maybe on a predictive level you can detect patterns in our behaviour but it certainly doesn’t mean INFJs dominate the “people-reader” sphere.

    • @kyurei4478
      @kyurei4478 11 місяців тому +2

      No matter how a person is going to act, their final goal is always their interest so their happiness. It is the existential goal behind every action. So if an INFJ understands what motivates you, so "your soul", they can predict how you're going to act by downloading your personality. This is why INFJs are better at reading people than INTJs for example and why feelers are generally better at reading people (doesn't mean others types can't become masters at it). Everyone is human.

    • @csreiter
      @csreiter 4 місяці тому

      INFJs only see what people express, not what's under the surface. That's not how Fe works.

  • @tehflooper
    @tehflooper Рік тому +20

    I believe that ISTPs are also the best at reading wild animal behavior.

    • @ma00055
      @ma00055 Рік тому

      Cool

    • @youweird6625
      @youweird6625 Рік тому +2

      I truly think this is true but I can't help myself laughing

  • @photosky14
    @photosky14 Рік тому +12

    My experience is that Intps are the best at it.

    • @louisejoel
      @louisejoel Рік тому

      I'm doubting that I'm INTP now

    • @photosky14
      @photosky14 Рік тому +1

      @@louisejoel why are doubting it?

    • @louisejoel
      @louisejoel Рік тому

      @@photosky14 Because I'm not good at reading people, I take their behaviour at face value and miss subtle cues

    • @photosky14
      @photosky14 Рік тому +1

      @@louisejoel If you engage more with people and get out of your comfort zone you will trust your judgement more.

  • @jaredvaughan1665
    @jaredvaughan1665 Рік тому +4

    Great video. INTPs discern good and bad people very well.
    As Shakespeare said:
    "Nothing is good or bad but the thought makes it so."

  • @TheRyanHeffner
    @TheRyanHeffner Рік тому +4

    The B plot line in this video are the nonverbal interactions and reactions he has with the folks walking by.

  • @tehflooper
    @tehflooper Рік тому +8

    It may be that INTJs are good at reading people they already know.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +4

      ​​​​@@jellyfishi_Te couldn't comprehend on how reading people is not like reading data and not assuming it like some sort of machinery.

  • @kimsaunders
    @kimsaunders Рік тому

    That is so helpful. Thank you !

  • @pingz2454
    @pingz2454 Рік тому +9

    In an older video you explained how both ISTJ and ESTP were the best ones at calling peaple's bull****, i think we were discussing a situation where all of they types were beeing compared on how quickly they would be able to tell if a door to door salesman was competent and honest. Also in the past you explained how high Te users could basically walk into a room and read what everyone is thinking wich also counts as "reading peaple".

    • @SS-bu8ez
      @SS-bu8ez Рік тому

      He even mentioned ISFPs and ENTJs are good at reading people in another video.

  • @luaysalim
    @luaysalim Рік тому

    Yeah, and İ thankful for you and being very helpful entp.

  • @susanrodriquez3757
    @susanrodriquez3757 Рік тому +34

    Very interesting topic. I have an intp son and while they can come off as detached and be perceived as uncaring, they can be highly perceptive of the feelings of others and become super sensitive to a social setting. This makes them good at reading others over time. If my son feels the bad vibe of others, sadness, other negative emotions, he would literally get up, hide, or leave the room (and he can read it lickity split super speed time). Even as an adult he picks up on such vibes immediately and looks for a quick escape exit.
    Meanwhile my INFJ daughter while she cries more and appears more outwardly sensitive and emotionally equipped, is highly empathetic etc., she is also much less sensitive to such emotions in that she can embrace them and will even engage in negative emotion activities whether she was the one bringing it up or others do (although she does seem to want everyone in the group on the same page which is a type of emotional harmony positive or negative). I think my intp son really wants a harmonious environment even more than people like infjs which seems to go against the stereotype of intps being robots. Because they are so sensitive to the feelings of others, they simply have difficulty handling it. It’s not that they don’t care. Apathy is their defense and survival mechanism. The desire for inferior feeling harmony and empathy with intps is also often in direct conflict with their introverted thinking logic which can cause issues. Truth and feelings simply don’t always align.

    • @photosky14
      @photosky14 Рік тому +9

      I don't know how many times I dismissed Intps opinions about people, then me coming back apologizing to them about it. I used to ignore obvious signs about people cause I wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt and thought Intps are just way too pessimistic anyways to listen to them, but now I know I shoud never dismiss their valuable opinions.

    • @susanrodriquez3757
      @susanrodriquez3757 Рік тому +5

      @@photosky14 Yeah it’s a friendship that develops over time as intps and infjs learn to understand one another. My son and daughter are literally best friends (I speak about how difficult it is for men and vvomen to be platonic friends but there are exceptions). They would go through fire for each other. It’s actually a valuable relationship if you ever find an Intp who is worthy spending time with. I’m assuming you’re an Infj.

    • @aladdout9454
      @aladdout9454 Рік тому +1

      i have an intp friend and sometimes we will be joking around and it goes too far, he'll step in to create harmony and will get sensitive.

    • @susanrodriquez3757
      @susanrodriquez3757 Рік тому +4

      @@aladdout9454 Having Fe inferior they constantly worry about how they come off to others (especially if they value a friendship). They are much less worried about how they feel (they don’t really care so much about how they feel with Fi demon) and are more worried about how others in the room feel. I can certainly see how your friend would act that way if he values your friendship and he thinks the friendship might potentially be under duress based off what was said (which since he is your friend he obviously does care).

    • @photosky14
      @photosky14 Рік тому +3

      @@susanrodriquez3757 Yes, I am an Infj, looking back I was so dumb to not listen to Ti hero:) Yeah, these friendships keeps me grounded.

  • @isabelledinneweth
    @isabelledinneweth Рік тому +4

    yeah ofcourse entp , that is why i watch your channel , so i can learn

  • @CuddleClaw.
    @CuddleClaw. 11 місяців тому +4

    I’m not surprised ISTP is on here. We’re so sensitive with Fe and see everything with Se. And I’ve seen other ISTPs be able to read me and others very well. Whereas ENTP and ESTP … both of these types have misread me several times. But, I understand why they made the list. They have some huge strengths, for sure.

  • @jordymichelle92
    @jordymichelle92 Рік тому +5

    I kNew ISTP would be on this list. And it makes sense that ESTPs are too since they always seem to be the "cool" ones and the ones that always know what to say.

  • @Amrrkevin
    @Amrrkevin Рік тому +1

    Is it stp or nfj?

  • @ridvantahir3755
    @ridvantahir3755 Рік тому +5

    I like your style

  • @borisvandruff7532
    @borisvandruff7532 Рік тому +31

    “bUt InFjS aRe ThE bEsT aT rEaDiNg PeOpLe!”
    Finally one video that doesn’t pay lip service to my type, which is actually garbage at reading people due to the shadow stack.

    • @dsrohera
      @dsrohera Рік тому +1

      I think Infj 's are better at understanding people than reading them. Because they're stuck with seeing the potential of them all.

    • @simransingh-lr7qb
      @simransingh-lr7qb Рік тому +3

      He said INTJ not INFJ, FJ are actually good at typing people. Chases mentor was a infj

    • @Brickwilliams
      @Brickwilliams Рік тому +1

      Total bullshit, you don’t know what you’re talking about

    • @borisvandruff7532
      @borisvandruff7532 Рік тому

      @@simransingh-lr7qb difference between typing people and reading people. INFJs have Te trickster and Ne nemesis so all you have to do to defeat one is show ZERO emotion.

    • @malakashraf2801
      @malakashraf2801 Рік тому +2

      I expected it to be honest, maybe lack of te trickster and si demon causes lack of track, but doesn't mean they don't sense it deeply

  • @mbfbird2760
    @mbfbird2760 Рік тому

    I was ready for you to say that istps not to be on the list but everything you said started to manifes in my life once I learned how to be more confident.

  • @someoneRando_
    @someoneRando_ Рік тому +12

    So, FJ's are worse than TP's because we're affiliative? I genuinely want to know.
    I'm not entirely sure. But I guess we have it easier when it comes to doing what's appropriate, and therefore, getting less backlash, which means a lesser need to read others in order to adapt. I can also understand how having higher Te does help a lot.

    • @stefanobesliu6458
      @stefanobesliu6458 Рік тому +10

      Pretty much. FJ's are generally speaking the ones that follow the TP's social norms.
      We FJ's are often considered the most authenthic when we really just look for authenthicity from TP types so we can adapt to them and mimick their behaviour.
      As an INFJ i also got complimented by an ESTP that i really know people and how to read them, but i definitely lack the pragmatism that he has to use that info to my advantage. An ESTP will use that information to get further in life and improve people, while INFJ will use that information to create better bonds and improve the Fi of other people.
      And then people say that ESTPs are mean when in reality they are the best type. Such a stacked cognitive function array. If developed, they also are quite empathethic and loyal. If i were give the chance to change from INFJ to ESTP, i would easily do it. Our bros are the best

    • @borisvandruff7532
      @borisvandruff7532 Рік тому +6

      TPs are better because they understand how to think like a pragmatist, being pragmatic themselves. Gives them a farther mental reach.

    • @urquanoverlord2538
      @urquanoverlord2538 Рік тому +5

      Well, higher Ti makes deductions pretty reliable, and being pragmatic reduces the impact of Fe on the Ti, pragmatic doesn't sugarcoat, and when you're analyzing people's behavior this is quite useful. You're also right, having more Te does help. I think fj's end up being more likely to use general labels like "toxic", or overuse terms like "narcissist". Fe is the mace because it's got a lot of surface area, but it doesn't get down into the specifics like Ti. Still, having high Fe should still allow fj',s to be more aware of what others value, and knowing what others value is important too.

    • @stefanobesliu6458
      @stefanobesliu6458 Рік тому +1

      @@dasein9980 well, this can be said about each type. ESTPs are really well rounded. Pragmatic and interest based ego is a privilege at times, while their systematic unconscious makes them good at managing people and things in their life.
      Ni inferior can be a pain in the butt, but i would definitely take it instead of Se inferior. Fi trickster at times can be beneficial because it makes you detached from this not so nice world. Ti parent leads to better results than Fe parent in the long run as long as the individual that is criticized by the ESTP acknowledges what his flaws are and the ESTP is a good example

    • @andreag4477
      @andreag4477 Рік тому

      I think the low awareness of other people's thoughts puts them at a disadvantage

  • @wsmac27
    @wsmac27 11 місяців тому +1

    All areas of consciousness flowing simultaneously through all dimensions of the eternal universe. This human body is part of it and is simply a vehicle for that, we are at a great point in “history” of human civilization for expansion of all in the minds of individuals collectively as one human race.

  • @sandradibiaso7316
    @sandradibiaso7316 Рік тому +4

    I believe it's the mixture of ENTP and INTJ that makes you really good at reading people. You have admitted that you're an INTJ unconscious focused ENTP.

    • @dxfifa
      @dxfifa 23 дні тому

      INTJs are horrific at reading people. Fe trickster, paranoid, Se inferior tunnel vision, Ni hero judging too quickly with Fi child

  • @tiredironrepair
    @tiredironrepair Рік тому +1

    1:31 InTj's can suffer, unknowingly, from confirmation bias when judging others.
    My guess off the cuff is EsFj.
    I'm InTp and the E types that lie can usually fool me at first. Sometimes for awhile if they are good at it.

  • @Damion00000
    @Damion00000 Рік тому

    I called the heart temple while you were busy waffling :P

  • @--...--...--...
    @--...--...--... 4 місяці тому +1

    A self-actualized INFJ reigns supreme in reading people/understanding human nature (you literally say this, in summary, on your INFJ vid) - while ENTPs are great at it, they are not the best when comparing all types to their realized potential.

    • @Shinkyogan
      @Shinkyogan 3 місяці тому

      INFJ = people whisperer

  • @qasimimtiaz9668
    @qasimimtiaz9668 3 місяці тому

    How about xxfps?

  • @mikeraskin7319
    @mikeraskin7319 8 місяців тому +4

    I agree mostly but, I feel the ENFP is best. Because they predict intentions along with actions. While the NP's or TP's only see facts while the ENFP can also see others intentions. Therefore, I think no one beats the ENFP on that aspect

  • @clarinettel574
    @clarinettel574 Рік тому +4

    Se doms can be superficial

  • @daffling
    @daffling Рік тому +9

    I claim that INFJs are just as good at reading people as any of the type mentioned in the video.
    It’s just that it is a different type of reading people, I would say less analytical and more automatic. It also focuses on emotions and mood, but still, it gives a lot of useful information.
    Think about it for a sec. INFJ comes in a room. They instantly spot good/bad vibes/feelings of a person they meet there. They adjust their behaviour to a person’s current mood and therefore they can communicate with the person far better than other types. And everything of this is happening in seconds or minutes and on an autopilot.
    This is extremely useful when meeting with clients or counselling.

  • @nikitimmermans
    @nikitimmermans 7 місяців тому +3

    I agree about the TP types, but I expected to find INFJ in this also.

    • @kimngandong
      @kimngandong 4 місяці тому

      nah... INFJ are too paranoid to have a correct and objective insight into people's characters. They are too subjective and jump to wrong conclusions too fast all the time from my experience. Chase also said that they constantly alienate good people because of that. So yeah, INFJ and INTJ with their Ne nemesis are really bad at judging people. Imo, SFJ, NFP and ENFJ types can be excellent manipulators and con artists if they want, and they are the only types who have the highest chance at pulling a fast on the paranoid types like INFJ and INTJ. This is because these types have great perception about social norms, read people's emotions really well, and can appear moral according to societal standards. I think that only after trusting the wrong people could INFJ and INTJ improve their people reading skill and realize that not everyone who acts morally is actually moral.

  • @sonja1020
    @sonja1020 Рік тому +11

    52 year old INTP here and I am very good at reading people and this skill has been validated in my career. I am a director at a flight school. I am very accurate and I am quick. However that said, that does not negate other types' abilities. Time + experience can be the great equalizer. However, that is not always equally true for all. Ask me about my 60 year old Ex ENTP or my 60 year old ISTP male boss. Are they the exception or the rule? Don't know. Need more data points.

    • @louisejoel
      @louisejoel Рік тому

      Is this an innate ability or have you worked hard at it? I'm working on it but finding it tough. Ever since events in 2020 I have been fascinated by MBTI, mostly because of the chaotic and fearful behaviour of others around me

    • @sonja1020
      @sonja1020 Рік тому +1

      @@louisejoel Honestly, combination of nature and nurture. What, more specifically, do you find tough, if you don't mind me asking...? Can there be outliers? Can there be factors outside of the framework of cognitive functions? i.e. is there more to reading people besides 1. approach 2. information gathering and processing 3. awareness. And can this be taught? Survival can be an excellent motivator and push all types to develop....not just the types (TP) who have natural proclivities in these areas.

    • @louisejoel
      @louisejoel Рік тому

      @@sonja1020 I give people the benefit of the doubt too often and I find the betrayal tough when I find out it's much worse than my expectation, or I can't read when someone is about to attack me in a physical or mental way because I miss subtle cues. I freeze and don't react in time and now I'm more avoidant of people than I was.

    • @sonja1020
      @sonja1020 Рік тому +1

      @@louisejoel No one should be physically attacking you. That is not cool. Call the police if anyone threatens you. But in the context of power and social dynamics, human beings "come for" each other all the time. Perhaps that is what you meant with being attacked mentally? So you are saying that you give people the benefit of the doubt and then they either come for you, let you down in some way and then you feel betrayed and hurt. Do I understand you? And you want to get better at having fewer negative social interactions with others? So what Chase suggests that TPs do that helps them is by having a pragmatic approach. You can emulate this by asking yourself, why am I giving this person the benefit of the doubt? Have they honestly earned it? And if they have not, maybe don't extend yourself so much until you see more of their character emerge. In that case, you need to be practicing appropriate and effective boundaries and managing expectations - theirs and yours. Is this both with men and women or predominately one or the other?

    • @louisejoel
      @louisejoel Рік тому +1

      @@sonja1020 Health workers are not accountable to the po in my country, they get away with anything. I didn't see it coming on both occasions because I have this very silly conditioning of trust.

  • @AMindfulManiac
    @AMindfulManiac 11 місяців тому +3

    I’m a biased infj so I was kinda hoping I was one of them with a responsible Fe parent, but I get that. High objective Ti makes sense as the common denominator I’ve seen this in my istp and entp friends.

    • @Shinkyogan
      @Shinkyogan 3 місяці тому

      That's just the thing...they're all wrong. INFJs ARE the best at reading people...or I should say we can see a person's deepest and truest intentions...
      Ni+Fe =
      people whisperer...

  • @Coneman3
    @Coneman3 Рік тому +5

    Is INFJ read people on a deeper level. We can see into your soul. Lack of Si, Ne, Te and Fi means we are not good at reading people in general ways that people work. We see deeper into the matrix, at the expense of seeing the more surface level stuff.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +2

      Certainty no surface level, because without pragmatism you'll suck at reading people objectively.

    • @Coneman3
      @Coneman3 9 місяців тому

      What has pragmatism got to do with reading people?

  • @dairdb
    @dairdb Рік тому +19

    Chase is right. XXTPs read people like books. I would say the next few types ar ENXJs, ENTJs and ENFJs are really good at reading people, IF, and this is a big if, they are actually doing it without assuming intentions with Ne critic.

    • @marytheraspberry3145
      @marytheraspberry3145 Рік тому +5

      I was about to say smth about enxj's and Ne critic😄

    • @Brickwilliams
      @Brickwilliams Рік тому

      Lmao, no shot. Nfjs are better at reading people than ntps. Ntps are so systematic, they are barely even focused on people

    • @nikitimmermans
      @nikitimmermans Рік тому +3

      XXTP are not good at figuring out how people want to be treated thus ultimately are not as effective in dealing with others.

  • @simransingh-lr7qb
    @simransingh-lr7qb Рік тому

    Looking good chase

  • @qasimimtiaz9668
    @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +4

    i agree, i tend to stay away from xxtps as they can read me like a book.

  • @dsrohera
    @dsrohera Рік тому +5

    Can you type people based on their dressing sense or physical personality too?

    • @urquanoverlord2538
      @urquanoverlord2538 Рік тому +5

      Yes, Si users dress for comfort, the higher Ne is the more likely someone is to wear black, some types are more likely to talk with their hands but idk the rule on that one. There's a lot of little things.

    • @iamyou3080
      @iamyou3080 Рік тому +1

      @@urquanoverlord2538Which types are more likely to talk with their hands?

    • @qasimimtiaz9668
      @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +1

      Se users are better at it

    • @urquanoverlord2538
      @urquanoverlord2538 Рік тому

      @@iamyou3080 I do it (entp), entj does it, I think background types generally don't, I'm still figuring this out.

    • @Zpaaztyk
      @Zpaaztyk Рік тому

      ​​@@iamyou3080ovement/progression types. Though, yeah, Se optimistic does it too

  • @simransingh-lr7qb
    @simransingh-lr7qb Рік тому +5

    Is reading people the same as typing people?

    • @_snai
      @_snai Рік тому

      no ofc not

  • @wf4983
    @wf4983 Рік тому +4

    Thank you for your video! It shows very clear the *NTP thought process. My ex is an intp and a former one entp.
    Let me say one thing: you underestimate Fi for reading people. It is also the capacity to empathize with someone on a deep personal level, you can go into the others body, especially when in combination with Ne or Ni (infps are brilliant in this, but they don't see a need for categorizing or any analytical approach, they just do it personally in every interaction). Enfps like myself (jumper) also categorize logically using Te extensively...
    What I wanna say, different types have their own ways and strength in reading people. And I don't think Entps are very good at it due to lacking Fi. I do think Intps are quite good at it.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +1

      Out of topic, but what your opinions on the compatibility between enfp and intp in relationship based on your experience?
      What's the biggest challenge and the major issue that usually happens and difficult to solve?
      thanks,
      -intp

    • @wf4983
      @wf4983 Рік тому +1

      @@honor9lite1337 I think there is a good compatibility, especially when the Enfp is a jumper. I loved to be understood and talk from an intuitive thinking perspective. Also, I liked to come home and be quiet together, as I am an extrovert but can feel overwhelmed quite easily. So, the Intp can feel like a rooting to the Enfp. Also, I am critical in regard to fitting into groups - that is common ground for both types. And the love of beauty/atmosphere/ aestetics is alike. Both types are open and non-committal. But as nice as this can feel (to have no pressure) it can also be a pain point.
      Enfp and Intp have different ways to feel safe in a relationship. As far as I understood, Intps feel safe when they can withdraw from concrete reality and know that their partners do the same, they don't like their partners to have too much opportunities in the outside. Enfps need stimulation (outside) - but it's perceiving stimulation (not group or people stimulation). So, there is no threat to the relationship, but it can be felt as such by an Intp.
      I as Enfp jumper have some insecurities when it comes to feelings. They are important to me - and the basis for feeling safe in a relationship. Also, I can spot fake (but nice meant) reactions to my feelings. And Intps are often in the habit of blocking their original feelings in favour of their original thoughts.
      I think, honest communication is they key to make it work for the two types - if this comes from fi or ti shouldn't matter. And acceptance, that one might be more emotional (in expression) and the other more analytical. Doesn't mean it cannot be the other way round sometimes.
      I think, I should have had better understood how important it is for an Intp to feel in the 'same boat' with their partner. And I think, he should have taken my need for having an original emotional bond more seriously. We spoke about it some weeks ago, and we both agreed that it was trust that was missing - as we had two different perspectives on that.

    • @utena8518
      @utena8518 Рік тому

      agree

  • @Emily.J.
    @Emily.J. Рік тому +8

    I guessed entp correctly, but I was expecting you to go with Nps, not Tps so that surprised me. I absolutely see how fe and ti plays into but I think Ne is absolutely crucial and I dont quite understand how an ne trickster is in the top 4. No offense 😅

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому

      Hmm.. Interesting.

    • @HuKayers
      @HuKayers Рік тому +2

      @Emily.J. I see whachu mean. But since we can’t rely on our sense of intuition, we just look at the way people behave (Se parent shit) to understand people’s type. Certain types have certain behaviors that are distinctly unique to them. And once you meet enough people, you can use their behavior to distinguish who’s who. No predictions needed, at least in this case. Heck, before I ran into CSJ’s system, I was typing people naturally before I knew the system. However the system makes it easier to explain what I sense in people’s behavior to tell them apart.
      Basically, every vector of the type grid has a certain type of behavior associated with it that I can sense. And I use that to logically put them together to create a holistic model of a personally type.
      But IDK I just sense shit

    • @urquanoverlord2538
      @urquanoverlord2538 11 місяців тому

      Se can see into people's pasts, or read people's body language. The best body language reader I ever met was an estp girl.

  • @alekskopysov7357
    @alekskopysov7357 Рік тому +2

    I'm INTP i made many mistakes reading people. Usually I have a feeling and intuition about others that something goes wrong. But It subtle and I decline it. In the end happens that I was right and I'm in trouble. I guess it is because SE trickster and NE parent makes me do mistakes. I try to go by intuition more often now it helps me alot but sometimes I miss something and only realize it much later.

  • @sandradibiaso7316
    @sandradibiaso7316 3 місяці тому

    My ESTP mom always compares me to my dad. "You are just like your dad. You talk on and on with no point like your dad," she says.

  • @luaysalim
    @luaysalim Рік тому

    What if you have one of those types in your subconscious?

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +1

      It's additional point, but still not the best by nature.

  • @KingofPersia
    @KingofPersia Рік тому +7

    I would say TP’s are more accurate at typing and reading people but I feel FJ are more able to utilize the type grid when interacting with people because of how affiliative they are.

  • @kyurei4478
    @kyurei4478 Рік тому

    At least among more thinker types, I think they're definitely the bests.

  • @Greg-lw4zb
    @Greg-lw4zb Рік тому +2

    I'm not a paying customer so I don't expect you to answer this but I immediately wondered, in the case of the INTP, how this ties to their Se Trickster, which I believe you once described as "not understanding the experience that they provide to others." It seems like there might be some overlap between that comment and this video, and I wonder how you would talk about the relationship between the two things for the INTP. Great video, as always, Chase. We really appreciate you.

    • @louisejoel
      @louisejoel Рік тому +1

      As an INTP I appreciate that sometimes the experience I bring to others sucks in terms of providing too much detail repetitively and dressing down derelicte, but I am not around people often.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +1

      It's not relevant, this video is about reading people which actually you can doing it without giving any experience or even having many interaction with people.
      You just have to observe the intent and trait of certain people and analyze them systematically.
      You can test your theory here and there of course.

    • @Greg-lw4zb
      @Greg-lw4zb Рік тому

      ​@@honor9lite1337 If a person doesn't understand the experience that they are giving to others, that implies that they don't have the faculties to read that person's responses, mannerisms, expressions, and behaviours in order to understand the interaction. Thus, my question is relevant, because Chase is talking about the ability to read others: why would an INTP be able to read people in one circumstance, but not the other? Which type are you, out of curiosity?

    • @snickers2423
      @snickers2423 Рік тому +2

      I'm not certified but I have listened to many of his lectures Intp have to create a system around there Se and use there si to guide dem the 3yr old acts as a sponge soaking Lots of insight While Ti /Ne act as social guidance but the real kicker in all of this Is an Intp who is subconscious focus or the creative tp although those 2 are different the situation still works out the same. By the way Intps r naturally creative by default but I would be normalizing I'll explain why an Intp who is creative is a mature Intp not 1 who take life seriously but who's coginitve functions r well developed n know how to behave if needed (so basically acting clueless but having a clue ) so what makes a creative Intp a well developed extroverted function that use Ne to create a system around blindspot Se by using Si child to soak in all the details for this to happen Intp have to view life as theoretics rather than the journey that is Empirical to make up for his/her cognitive dissonance. There r 4 types of Intp but here I will go over 2 of 4 da harmonius and creative Intp it gets kinda difficult to differentiate the harmonizing Intp to its creative counterpart the best way is to know the creative Intp is not a (yes man) he has the leadership qualities of a dominant tp its important for an Intp to have a inner circle and unlike the other Intps the creative Intp can only hang out with himself as an Intp or 1 that is creative Sure he can hang out with other types that might not be on the same wavelength but no worries these relationships can still kindle due to Octagram changes and typology I think I pretty much nailed It

    • @Supershoutmon
      @Supershoutmon Рік тому +2

      @@Greg-lw4zb
      mannerisms and behavior are abstract patterns (NE covers that) a persons subtle responses are emotional aswell as physical (FE covers that) expressions are the one where they need the most nurture to work out but you are overestimating how SE functions

  • @Brickwilliams
    @Brickwilliams Рік тому +12

    I feel like you’re trying to be different and controversial but excluding infjs which is totally deceptive and wrong

    • @Kurucnik
      @Kurucnik Рік тому +1

      Yes. But thats Ne which can lead to overcombination. Also maybe his Si remembering negative experiences with some INFJ's, which can sometimes be seen in lessons.
      Also could be because he sees Ni mainly as a power of will, which, altough, there can be some truth in it, doesn't match exactly much with how Jung himself described Ni. Ni+Fe is powerfull when reading others.

    • @Brickwilliams
      @Brickwilliams Рік тому +4

      @@aram6436 no there are certain types that are better at certain things in general. Like I wouldnt sit here and say nfjs are better than ntps at reading systems, because they aren’t. It’s not dehumanizing to say a type is better than another type at something. It’s humanizing if anything, we have strengths and flaws. I just don’t like being lied to because of bias, and this isn’t a “social norm,” if you could even call it that, that needs to be torn down. Because it’s based in truth, nfjs are the best at reading people, why should the truth be torn down? Because you’re annoyed by people saying it?

  • @riagargmd
    @riagargmd Рік тому +1

    Arent the intuitive types, like ENFJ, INFJ, etc, are good at reading people as well due to high EQ and mirroring, etc.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +2

      They certainly could but then they are not the best, because without pragmatism you'll suck at reading people objectively.

    • @alteredcatscyprus
      @alteredcatscyprus 8 місяців тому +1

      I think not because we are trying to ignore what we see because we feel like it is immoral to see through people and besides, it’s terrible way to move people if that is what you are trying to do, and we are. Better to accept people as they present themselves to you out of respect for their boundaries if you want to connect on a deep level with them. All the rest can unfold later.

  • @Kurucnik
    @Kurucnik Рік тому +1

    This whole thing is based on the fact that the ones who best read people are on the Ti-Fe axis. (Having both Ti and Fe functions but Ti higher than Fe). But, at the same time, there are studies that confirm that intuition is a higher sign of intelligence than thinking. (People with the highest iq are either N dom or auxiliary) -
    But one needs to see Ni correctly than mainly as a will to power, right? Ni is much more than this.
    Many people who have used introverted intuition trough the history are scientists, philosophers...The priority is subconscious data processing.. Ni+Fe is more effective than Ti+Fe.
    This does not make sense. Plus I know people around me who are ISTPs and INTPs, which have Fe in an inferior position
    and within socializing some are ok with that, but some definitely do not feel like a fish in the water. One of them is also autistic.
    To say that people with Fe in an inferior position are in the top 4 who can read people best is imo nonsense. (Altough high Fe and low Ti is not also ideal combination)

  • @melobeats38
    @melobeats38 3 місяці тому

    More esfj intp videos please I am 20 and going through an identity crisis

  • @cindybobamallow7961
    @cindybobamallow7961 Рік тому

    How does this align with your statement “the ENTJ is constantly aware of what other people think?”

    • @Supershoutmon
      @Supershoutmon Рік тому +1

      I would guess that "knowing what people think" isnt quite the same as predicting behaviour and actions of said people

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому

      ​@@Supershoutmonnot the same obviously.

  • @majavidova4311
    @majavidova4311 Рік тому +4

    I disagree because I've seen too many disappointed TP types who made unwise decisions in regards of other people...On cognitive level they might be accurate but they are unable to predict human behaviour on emotional level..If they could none of them would get divorced or become a loner.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +5

      Being chained in any relationship is actually an insult for the superior TPs.
      Let us have peace of mind.

  • @JeffreyRGriese
    @JeffreyRGriese Рік тому

    it's giving Cruising (1980)

  • @sylviaowega3839
    @sylviaowega3839 Рік тому +4

    That explains also why do many people feel uncomfortable around me. A couple of people told me that some people don’t like being around me, because can see write through them.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +3

      No, not necessarily.
      It's mainly because the Se tricker aka the creepy side already manifesting itself.
      Intps have zero awareness on how they came of to people around them.

    • @sylviaowega3839
      @sylviaowega3839 Рік тому +1

      @@honor9lite1337 Now this is true that I have zero, or at least very minimal awareness is what is going on around me, and my situational awareness is really bad

    • @mrod8578
      @mrod8578 Рік тому

      ​Maybe initially but over time through Si (past memories and experience), Ne(using those past memories and exploration to predict future behaviors of others), and Fe (can sense others feelings and empathy towards others), they can absolutely be aware about how they come off towards others (often awkwardly and painstakingly so).
      Complete lack of awareness on how they come off is mostly during the development phase of INTPs. I bet many INTPs wish they were truly unaware about how they come off to others because then they would be less awkward and care less during the interaction (leading to much higher confidence in mannerisms and behavior). It's like INTPs are aware but their lack of Se makes it hard to fix in real time as it's happening.

    • @friendlyanomaly6109
      @friendlyanomaly6109 Рік тому

      @@honor9lite1337
      Not really true.
      Se Trickster is moreso about ignoring the sensory side of things "how you come across", but it's not the bulk of it. Not even half.

  • @frogsandrobbers
    @frogsandrobbers Рік тому

    Enfp can do this - quick analysis of the world around them, people and assumptions. Good at reading motives.

  • @utena8518
    @utena8518 Рік тому

    i think strong Te can read people very well, Hannibal is Intj,,, in my personal exp infps can be beasts,, creating facades and completely altering perception of people however they want,, estps are very good too and hard to fool but possible,,,, i find alpha quadra people clueless in that departament

  • @qasimimtiaz9668
    @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому

    so xxtps true bad boys?

  • @ethir6072
    @ethir6072 Рік тому +1

    👋 Hey folks
    How exactly do you differentiate between other people's emotions and intentions (positive and negative both)?
    I think and feel that Ne + Fe users would naturally understand it.
    - an Fe + Ni user

    • @friendlyanomaly6109
      @friendlyanomaly6109 Рік тому

      What do you mean by this?

    • @ethir6072
      @ethir6072 Рік тому

      @@friendlyanomaly6109 consider tiger cubs in wild with their mother. People would feel like they want to pet them, but that's not what they'd "really want" because of obvious reasons.
      So here I see what they feel like they want to do and what they actually plan on doing are two different acts: 1 is their feelings, another is their intention.
      Sometimes people express their feelings/emotions, and other times they express their intentions/plan.
      So how to understand what a person in consideration is expressing their emotions or intentions?

    • @friendlyanomaly6109
      @friendlyanomaly6109 Рік тому

      @@ethir6072
      From my perspective,
      Sometimes Ne brings my attention to what someone's intent is or might be without me having to think about it whereas Fe brings my attention to what their feeling is or might be without me having to really think about it either, so I don't have to ask myself "is this an intent or feeling?" Because if it comes from Ne, then it isn't feeling, but if it comes from Fe, then it isn't intent.

    • @ethir6072
      @ethir6072 Рік тому

      @@friendlyanomaly6109 👍

  • @Brickwilliams
    @Brickwilliams Рік тому +8

    It’s also laughable that you say si is better at reading people than se, wtf?

    • @qasimimtiaz9668
      @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +1

      Si is observation

    • @UrosKovacevic91
      @UrosKovacevic91 Рік тому +2

      Si is learning from your own past and mistakes and Se from other peoples past and mistakes. Since typing is not yet popular, there is a very small pool of other people's Si who are good at typing that Se users can learn from.

    • @Brickwilliams
      @Brickwilliams Рік тому

      @@qasimimtiaz9668 no it isn’t lmao. Se is literally focused on other people and what they’re doing in the moment. Si is self focused. So how the hell is si better at reading people, it isn’t

    • @qasimimtiaz9668
      @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +2

      @@Brickwilliams Si is 5 senses bro.

    • @Brickwilliams
      @Brickwilliams Рік тому

      @@qasimimtiaz9668 receiving senses, not giving them. also long term memory, discipline, duty, etc, but wtf is your point?

  • @Hybe123
    @Hybe123 Рік тому +4

    You're gonna say ESTP because I've actually watched your channel and you've said it before. I think you were tied INFJ too.

    • @themoonbleu627
      @themoonbleu627 Рік тому +1

      He changed it to his type

    • @Hunter.13
      @Hunter.13 Рік тому

      typing people ESTP INFJs, reading people differs.

  • @user-xk9cr3mu3k
    @user-xk9cr3mu3k Рік тому

    And what do think are the worst types at it?

    • @qasimimtiaz9668
      @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +3

      fjs and fps

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +1

      ​@@aram6436INFJ SD | SF would be the most assumptive type of all, their Te trickster actually become their biggest damper, following is their present-but-ignored Ne, preventing them seeing anything beside their own synthesis of reality.
      In sort, sure they can read others, but not in a way that TPs do which is processed objectively and systematically.
      Since specifically for INFJ SD|SF, it processed only in relation to their collective map of assumption.

  • @ma00055
    @ma00055 Рік тому

    ISFPs are good readers?

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому

      No by nature. Doesn't have Ti-Fe axis on top.

  • @al6260
    @al6260 Місяць тому

    2:40 5:09 6:42 7:44 4 types

  • @GetYossedLol
    @GetYossedLol Рік тому +10

    Disagree with NTPs. we don't read people well, we associate them to archetypes which I wouldn't call "reading" people. for example- *sees a sad artist* NTP: "ah the tortured artist type guy, probably makes paintings for his lover". It is very surface level. I think the answer is- all templar types.

    • @anandaalvarez4336
      @anandaalvarez4336 Рік тому +5

      you’re right in a sense.. they see a side of people only based on Ti judging.. but there are other forms of judging

    • @feelsrestricted8322
      @feelsrestricted8322 Рік тому +2

      IdK, the issue is with infjs they have Te trickster, which means they can often not understand what other intentions or thoughts are if they’re biased. Even with istps they have Ne trickster which blinds them to other’s future, needs, or desires. These seem to me to be the most crucial aspect to understanding others(as well as their feelings).

  • @Loveficriticthemost
    @Loveficriticthemost Рік тому

    As entp i assume best reading people is someone have no Blindspot 7th function on Ne, te and fe.
    So i will going Intp the first one that more accurate than me, as you know ne dom is too wild as you see this performance intelligent dude.

  • @malakashraf2801
    @malakashraf2801 Рік тому +2

    Hey, don't say you psychic-ed the guy next to you 👀
    He must have asked anything, all those letters

  • @ameliadeshane9192
    @ameliadeshane9192 11 місяців тому

    Why do you put your wedding ring on the other finger?

    • @CSJoseph
      @CSJoseph  11 місяців тому

      I was not wearing a wedding ring here

    • @CSJoseph
      @CSJoseph  11 місяців тому

      I am not married.

    • @ameliadeshane9192
      @ameliadeshane9192 7 місяців тому

      Oh. I thought you were being shady.

    • @ameliadeshane9192
      @ameliadeshane9192 7 місяців тому

      Your business anyhow. Just wondering.

  • @miklosnagy7411
    @miklosnagy7411 Рік тому +3

    you are thin, is everything ok?

  • @crchief3997
    @crchief3997 Рік тому +1

    I wonder what personality type AI would be?

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +1

      Couldn't imagine other than NT types.

    • @crchief3997
      @crchief3997 Рік тому

      @@honor9lite1337 I figure it would be an INTJ

    • @crchief3997
      @crchief3997 Рік тому

      @@aram6436 I thought personalities were how individuals process information. So depending on the program and how it process information should give a personality "type".
      Yeah you're right you could program the ai to have any type of personality

    • @sue2cue
      @sue2cue 6 місяців тому

      Lol

  • @AndrewSlays
    @AndrewSlays Рік тому +1

    istp master race 😇

  • @paulhoover1768
    @paulhoover1768 Рік тому

    Why not ENFJs? It's like all I do is read people like the Matrix

  • @Civil206
    @Civil206 Рік тому +3

    Hmm, I think NJs and TPs are generally best at reading people.

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому

      And the reason is? What's the same underlying factor about these type?

    • @Civil206
      @Civil206 Рік тому +3

      @@honor9lite1337 intj here and currently at work so please don’t expect the best explanation rn off the cuff. But having the combination Ni-se makes us attuned to so many different little things people do and patterns we’ve seen before. Context dependent ofc, ntjs from more a rationale point of view. Fe trickster and Ne nemesis paranoia can get things wrong, but I don’t make the wrong reads most the time. TPs for all the reasons CSJ mentioned in the video

    • @friendlyanomaly6109
      @friendlyanomaly6109 Рік тому

      @@Civil206
      How do you know you aren't wrong?
      How do you know you don't just merely think you are correct?
      That's my problem with the whole premise of the question: "which type is best at reading others."

    • @Civil206
      @Civil206 Рік тому +1

      ​@@friendlyanomaly6109 The immediate answer is you don't, because intuition is never going to be 100%. The complicated answer is most humans/people follow very typical patterns of behavior, engagement, in addition to involuntary body language or queues, some of which is reinforced by social standards (Fe). Though, body language and nervous quirks can be particular to each individual, that paired with an array of other presented evidence (language/use of words, tonality, actions) strengthens that "gut" feeling overall since its less of a gut feeling at that point. Factor in your social standing/status, perception in any given situation and innate affinity toward that individual and it gets that much easier too, especially if you know their type.
      Bottom line is: Have and set your boundaries upfront and see where things go from there, and if they go, you'll eventually have your answer and if they don't, you do too. So verifying intent is best way.
      In a high risk situation though, I'm gonna go with my intuition (factoring all above and some) every time, right or wrong.

    • @friendlyanomaly6109
      @friendlyanomaly6109 Рік тому

      @@Civil206
      Underrated mindset.

  • @tanishqavishwakarma9151
    @tanishqavishwakarma9151 Рік тому

    Why didn't you say ISTJ???

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому

      I rarely see an ISTJ, they are usually on accounting department and don't interact or blend well with others.

  • @sandymakesplans
    @sandymakesplans 7 місяців тому

    i'm reading that natty boh aesthetic

  • @hugfal-animepiano1178
    @hugfal-animepiano1178 Рік тому +4

    Oh comon its gotta be intj, no fe needed, you just need information and a death stare to read them 😈

    • @qasimimtiaz9668
      @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +2

      intjs read data, not information

    • @IntoDeathandTheBuddahMatrix
      @IntoDeathandTheBuddahMatrix Рік тому

      @@qasimimtiaz9668 You are saying data and information are two different things?

    • @qasimimtiaz9668
      @qasimimtiaz9668 Рік тому +5

      @@IntoDeathandTheBuddahMatrix yeah, information is insights extracted from data

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому

      ​@@IntoDeathandTheBuddahMatrixlearn the fundamental topic in computer science or other similar field, then never write that moronic comment again.

    • @IntoDeathandTheBuddahMatrix
      @IntoDeathandTheBuddahMatrix Рік тому

      @@honor9lite1337 explain it

  • @Zpaaztyk
    @Zpaaztyk Рік тому +3

    I work with one of each TP type. They have taught me more about what is ethically realistic than anyone else, and although they grate on my nerves here and there they have my earnest respect and appreciation. INFJs need to be brought down every so often, guys. We can't do it without you, so thank you and please stick around.
    Cheers.

    • @susanrodriquez3757
      @susanrodriquez3757 Рік тому +5

      Infjs are also super self deprecating and can suffer from low self esteem in spite of their great gifts (l think my daughter has these struggles and she’s a physically attractive woman). TP types need to be careful with that. Since infjs can view themselves negatively, sometimes the opposite approach is needed to lift them up. I agree sometimes they need to be taken down a peg or 2 but it depends on the area and how you do it. Infjs being up there for rarest type (depending on who you ask) are generally not catered to when it comes to their problems which can be an issue.

    • @stefanobesliu6458
      @stefanobesliu6458 Рік тому +2

      ​@@susanrodriquez3757you cant really help it, especially when you have Si demon, Fi critic and Te trickster. Its the perfect recipe for self deprecation and lack of self esteem.
      On youtube i feel cool, but in real life i always end up doubting myself with the smallest of things. Meeting people that are wealthier and smarter than me gives me anxiety that creates constant self doubt or feelings of 'missing out on things".
      I think a lot of times it doesnt really matter how gifted an individual is. Its all about how he sells that image to the point where even the individual himself believes all those things to be true. Basically confidence.
      Thats why INFJs often end up suiciding or just being a failure in life. We are too sensitive to other people's images or abilitied. INTPs and ESTPs are a lot more confident which oftentimes makes them a lot more capable. Being pragmatic is a bonus

    • @dominikastrauss5208
      @dominikastrauss5208 Рік тому

      @@stefanobesliu6458 Maybe try to get some attention, idk if it solves that problem, but you will feel so much better about yrslf when you see other people being comfortable in your presence

    • @stefanobesliu6458
      @stefanobesliu6458 Рік тому

      @@aram6436 could you please explain each octagram combination? I would like to know whats my octagram. From what i can tell, in social settings I go autopilot on ENFP subconscious all the time. I rarely get to delve into my ESTP subconscious. But when i do, i really become sincere and very direct. I feel like i have been experiencing my ISTJ superego a lot more lately, by being very hateful towards my closest ones due to my feelings of worthlessness and inferiority complex

  • @k0j747
    @k0j747 Рік тому +1

    Lmao im an ENTP and one of my brothers is an ESTP and i was like i swear he better not say ENTP or ESTP, “watches the video” god damit

    • @_snai
      @_snai Рік тому +1

      im an ESTP and my brother is an ENTP and we're fucking good at it (Like most things) lmao

  • @timewalker6654
    @timewalker6654 Рік тому +1

    This guy is good.

  • @ayarouas1652
    @ayarouas1652 7 місяців тому +1

    How the hell is ISTP in the list but Infp/infj are not 😂

    • @bawbaw1228
      @bawbaw1228 6 місяців тому

      Because they are good at it and are observant ? Maybe ?

  • @aladdout9454
    @aladdout9454 Рік тому +2

    Entps?? nah. xnfps I'd say. Estps...yes true lol.
    Istps...they can but they do get bamboozled every now and then.

  • @aram6436
    @aram6436 Рік тому +4

    That's kinda fair but don't you think Ne and their interaction style also plays an important role when it comes to reading people? For example, ESTP may be able to utilize their ISTJ shadow but they can't really read other people intentions long enough or even at all and instead they assume other people intentions as bad by default whether they're aware of it or not which means they suck at reading people in that realm. What about inexperienced NTP? they can't be the best at reading people if they're not able to gain the experience in order to make a systematic process on handling people hence why they get manipulated easily by interest-based people. I mean theoretically, yeah TP could be the best type at reading people but only of you take into account certain factors but if you look at all factors, there's no such thing as the best type at reading people especially if you look at reality and how people actually interact. Your reasoning is more towards, the best case scenario for TP (for example, ENTP getting more experience, ESTP utilizing their shadow) but I could make an argument that if you look at the best case scenario for other types, other types can also be good at reading people utilizing whatever mental tools they have developed in a more efficient way and also getting the best nurture thus developing their own unique processes to read people.

  • @AbbaOjcze
    @AbbaOjcze Рік тому +1

    This mustache reminds me of one character from "Orange is New Black." oof.

  • @SirYITCHIN
    @SirYITCHIN Рік тому +1

    Wasn't the INFJ the best at typing people? I guess this is different

  • @snickers2423
    @snickers2423 Рік тому

    From the perspective of an Intp SD/uf would actually be more giving to others a good experience cs joesph u have to 1 day explain the difference between Se and Fe in depth they can at times act the same way I guess there is a true fineline Istp have se parent and fe inferior which is remarkable since se is extroverted sensation of giving to others but might not know what they want but fe kinda acts in the same way its quite easy to tell the difference between but the similarities not so much Fe focuses on what stems from the individual while se prioritize his or her occasion where they can therefore showcase there skill Chase before I go there something to be said about Entp in general they where this Mask where they go Masquerading in riding around they're 🎠 its enjoyable I like hanging around Entp especially Entp females, I find them most attractive although esfp take me to another level, although appreciate Isfj although they don't like me very much. As I was to say Masquerade for the women n a vendetta for men It's like they have a Master hand and they string together puppets wen u ask dem a question they go Aw ah aw ah while never really answering the question I find them so intrinsically fascinating This is called da Intrigued relationship

  • @Coneman3
    @Coneman3 Рік тому

    Wow, with that look you could have joined Frankie Goes to Hollywood in the 80s lol 😂

  • @icingcake
    @icingcake 7 місяців тому +1

    Lol that people would guess INTJ. My guess is INFP.

  • @walking-sm9js
    @walking-sm9js Рік тому +5

    I thought enfps and infps are the best at reading me but i guess you're right, entps and estps just read people in a sec!
    Even if it might help a lot more to be valued and heard...

    • @anandaalvarez4336
      @anandaalvarez4336 Рік тому +5

      They both read people well, only TP’s check what is true or false and FP’s read what’s good or bad plus intentions

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому +1

      ​@@anandaalvarez4336NTPs can check what's true/false plus intentions too.

    • @anandaalvarez4336
      @anandaalvarez4336 Рік тому

      @@honor9lite1337 if you say so.. I’m not so sure

  • @TokyoTaisu
    @TokyoTaisu Рік тому +1

    ENTJ = hardware
    ENTP = firmware
    INTJ = software
    INTP = math
    Firmware needs to bridge so needs to understand how people work else they can't survive.
    Math needs to be accurate else they can't survive.

    • @louisejoel
      @louisejoel Рік тому +1

      Not good at math INTP here

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 Рік тому

      ​@@louisejoelit's not about that math.

  • @hardyblues2194
    @hardyblues2194 10 місяців тому

    So weird that the old man just sat next to you.