I remember back in the '70s shooting with film. Switching from film to digital was like the difference between night and day. Imagine having a photo you can look at right away! Really a big game-changer. I recently switch to mirrorless and the feeling of chance was very similar to my experience of switching from film to digital.
Having moved to an R5, one of my best likes is the lack of shutter noise. The silent shooting is something I find really good. Looking forward to when I am able to join you again and photograph wildlife.
I agree/disagree in some of your points: - Price decrease: yes of course, but on the other hand, your new R6 starts loosing value from the moment you bought it. And in a year from now, the R6 will be cheaper, so the extra you got for your old model you already lost by buying at the higher 'new model' price. (Of course you can utelise the newer camera longer :-). - Latest technology: absolutly! The R6/R5 has some real advantages, specifically for wildlife shots. Best new feature is the Autofocus, that really is leap forward from the DSLR. BUT, there are also some big draw-backs: it uses considerably more battery than my 5D IV. With my 5D IV (or III / II) I could go and shoot for many days whithout having to worry. Now, I must make sure, that I have at least one, better two spare batteries in my bag. Also that I have to turn my camera on to look through the viewfinder is a bit irritating. - The increase in image quality is (IMO) not different than it was between previous generations of DSLR models. With every new model you get a little increase of image quality, but its (again IMO) not big enough to buy the latest model. I still shoot a lot with a 5D II and it would be very difficult to tell the model from looking at the photos. - Frame rates: Yes, this can be an advantage. It also means that you need to spend much more time sorting through the shots later at home ;-) - Exposure: This is definety a great advantage! No more under/over exposed images because you forgot to reset the exposure correction after the last sequence. Good light!
I had been equally reluctant for the EVF quality, but end of September I lost my patience waiting for the unicorn R7, so I swapped my 70D for an R6 .. and didn't regret it for second. As for battery life: when you set up the camera efficiently (See EOS R5 - the settings you need to know from Jan Wegener) and when you mainly shoot stills you can do much better than the cipa numbers. One day I took 4344 shots on just 2 batteries. couldn't do so with my dslr.
It is more benefit to buy better glass . Another aspect to consider is uv filters, I have found a great difference in image quality dependant on the uv filter make. The image quality was boosted using the best for the lens. Even the same make of uv on the same make of lens showed different results. The Hoya pro1 Digital mc proved to be excellent, better than no filter.
One of the reasons I switched from DSLR tot mirroless was the fact that the Olympus mirorless system (micro four thirth) was way more compact than their DSLR system. Lenses are smaller, weight less so you can easily carry more gear in just the same bag.At time ialready knew that this was gonna be the new sytem in the future. Although the first models suffered with a bit of image quality compared to the top model DSLR's the image quality was good. I use the mirroless system for years now and see and experience nothing but benefits.
Moving to the R5, was my best move ever. The EF or third party lenses like my Sigma 150-600mm Sport lens, also focus much more accurate and faster these days. ISO noise at up to 6400, can easily be fixed in Lightroom. Quick switching between eye focus and single points are so easy, due to the customize ability of the mirror-less camera buttons - you can setup the camera button functions , the way you prefer to shoot wild life. I love it. Thx for the video, it made me realize again how lucky we are in 2021, to have this technology available. Please make another nice video like your Tweerivieren one, but on on Nossob this time.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I went for the Fujifilm XT-4 & XF 100-400mm lens. I'm really happy with it. Was the best option for my budget. Love the channel & content! Thank you VS
I recently got the Canon 1000D from my aunt, good camera for a beginner to learn the basics of photography, do you have any tips I can use to better my photography skills?? I would also like to get your opinion on the Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless Digital Camera.
Hello Johan. My beginners' course online will be perfect for you. You can find it here: bit.ly/BeginnersPhotographyCourse - You are welcome to whatsapp me on 0827988817 if you have any questions. Kind regards. Villiers
Thanks Christelle. For wildlife, its frame rate is a bit low - 6.5fps, and that’s why I’d rather go for the R6 (which can shoot up to 20fps). It is, however, a very good mirrorless camera with a very reasonable price.
High end Mirrorless are simply unattainable to most photographers. And it seems like a secondhand high end DSLR would be a better option than the lower range Mirrorless. Would a secondhand 90D be better than a Canon M50mark ii?
Lucy, personally I wouldn’t buy a DSLR ever again. I’d look at something like an R10 or R7, at least for wildlife. The M50ii is still a bit limited for wildlife.
Thanks for the video. I'm currently exploring this right now. Have you had any experience with Nikon mirrorless and which models would you advise on... bearing in mind budget is very restricted
Unfortunately the Nikon mirrorless models are not as good as the Canon and Sony ones, but the hope is that they will bring out something that matches the Canon R6 soon.
@@TheSafariExpert thanks for the response Sadly this is what I had picked up so far. The ones that would be comparable would likely be beyond my budget
Thanks for the insight, very useful. As you are a new owner of the EOS R6 what lenses would you recommend for wildlife photography? P.S. Really enjoying your Botswana series, will be visiting there next year, so taking notes.
Hi G Babe. The Canon 100-500mm RF is a great lens for wildlife, as is the Canon 100-400mm mkii, which I use with an adapter. I’m glad you’re enjoying the Botswana series 🥳
@@frostybe3r, the R6 and R3 may have better low light capabilities, which one would expect, but to call the 5Dmk4 and D850’s “terrible” is a bit of a stretch 😏
@@TheSafariExpert Hah yeah perhaps, I've ordered the Canon EOS R3, only using an EF 500 f4 MK2 lens however, planning to eventually purchase an RF 600 f4.
Enrol in Wildlife Photography for Beginners and Amateurs: bit.ly/WildlifePhotographyCourse
I remember back in the '70s shooting with film. Switching from film to digital was like the difference between night and day. Imagine having a photo you can look at right away! Really a big game-changer. I recently switch to mirrorless and the feeling of chance was very similar to my experience of switching from film to digital.
Tom, that was my experience as well 👍🏻📸
Having moved to an R5, one of my best likes is the lack of shutter noise. The silent shooting is something I find really good. Looking forward to when I am able to join you again and photograph wildlife.
Hi Bruce! Yep, true silent shooting is fantastic! I can't wait for you to come with on safari again as well...
I agree/disagree in some of your points:
- Price decrease: yes of course, but on the other hand, your new R6 starts loosing value from the moment you bought it. And in a year from now, the R6 will be cheaper, so the extra you got for your old model you already lost by buying at the higher 'new model' price. (Of course you can utelise the newer camera longer :-).
- Latest technology: absolutly! The R6/R5 has some real advantages, specifically for wildlife shots. Best new feature is the Autofocus, that really is leap forward from the DSLR. BUT, there are also some big draw-backs: it uses considerably more battery than my 5D IV. With my 5D IV (or III / II) I could go and shoot for many days whithout having to worry. Now, I must make sure, that I have at least one, better two spare batteries in my bag. Also that I have to turn my camera on to look through the viewfinder is a bit irritating.
- The increase in image quality is (IMO) not different than it was between previous generations of DSLR models. With every new model you get a little increase of image quality, but its (again IMO) not big enough to buy the latest model. I still shoot a lot with a 5D II and it would be very difficult to tell the model from looking at the photos.
- Frame rates: Yes, this can be an advantage. It also means that you need to spend much more time sorting through the shots later at home ;-)
- Exposure: This is definety a great advantage! No more under/over exposed images because you forgot to reset the exposure correction after the last sequence.
Good light!
Thanks for your thoughts 🙏🏻🙂
I think I'm sold, getting the Z9 to pair with my 200-500mm for my trip to Mara in September!
I had been equally reluctant for the EVF quality, but end of September I lost my patience waiting for the unicorn R7, so I swapped my 70D for an R6 .. and didn't regret it for second. As for battery life: when you set up the camera efficiently (See EOS R5 - the settings you need to know from Jan Wegener) and when you mainly shoot stills you can do much better than the cipa numbers. One day I took 4344 shots on just 2 batteries. couldn't do so with my dslr.
I have also had great results with my R6’s battery life after having changed some settings to save power 🙌🏻
Very well done! I am waiting for my first Mirrorless, a Nikon Z9.
It is more benefit to buy better glass . Another aspect to consider is uv filters, I have found a great difference in image quality dependant on the uv filter make. The image quality was boosted using the best for the lens. Even the same make of uv on the same make of lens showed different results. The Hoya pro1 Digital mc proved to be excellent, better than no filter.
Better lenses will definitely help!
One of the reasons I switched from DSLR tot mirroless was the fact that the Olympus mirorless system (micro four thirth) was way more compact than their DSLR system. Lenses are smaller, weight less so you can easily carry more gear in just the same bag.At time ialready knew that this was gonna be the new sytem in the future. Although the first models suffered with a bit of image quality compared to the top model DSLR's the image quality was good. I use the mirroless system for years now and see and experience nothing but benefits.
That’s fantastic to hear, Johan 🙏🏻
Moving to the R5, was my best move ever. The EF or third party lenses like my Sigma 150-600mm Sport lens, also focus much more accurate and faster these days. ISO noise at up to 6400, can easily be fixed in Lightroom. Quick switching between eye focus and single points are so easy, due to the customize ability of the mirror-less camera buttons - you can setup the camera button functions , the way you prefer to shoot wild life. I love it. Thx for the video, it made me realize again how lucky we are in 2021, to have this technology available. Please make another nice video like your Tweerivieren one, but on on Nossob this time.
I hope to do so soon, Neels. Thanks for your comment.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I went for the Fujifilm XT-4 & XF 100-400mm lens. I'm really happy with it. Was the best option for my budget.
Love the channel & content! Thank you VS
Thank you so much 🙏🏻
I recently got the Canon 1000D from my aunt, good camera for a beginner to learn the basics of photography, do you have any tips I can use to better my photography skills??
I would also like to get your opinion on the Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless Digital Camera.
Hello Johan. My beginners' course online will be perfect for you. You can find it here: bit.ly/BeginnersPhotographyCourse - You are welcome to whatsapp me on 0827988817 if you have any questions. Kind regards. Villiers
Thanks for the great video Villiers! Would you recommend the Canon EOS RP mirrorless camera?
Thanks Christelle. For wildlife, its frame rate is a bit low - 6.5fps, and that’s why I’d rather go for the R6 (which can shoot up to 20fps). It is, however, a very good mirrorless camera with a very reasonable price.
High end Mirrorless are simply unattainable to most photographers. And it seems like a secondhand high end DSLR would be a better option than the lower range Mirrorless. Would a secondhand 90D be better than a Canon M50mark ii?
Lucy, personally I wouldn’t buy a DSLR ever again. I’d look at something like an R10 or R7, at least for wildlife. The M50ii is still a bit limited for wildlife.
How do you find leopards in kruger national park
Drive very early and very late, ideally in the south of the park. Berg en Dal and Skukuza are very good camps to search around.
Thanks for the video. I'm currently exploring this right now. Have you had any experience with Nikon mirrorless and which models would you advise on... bearing in mind budget is very restricted
Unfortunately the Nikon mirrorless models are not as good as the Canon and Sony ones, but the hope is that they will bring out something that matches the Canon R6 soon.
@@TheSafariExpert thanks for the response
Sadly this is what I had picked up so far. The ones that would be comparable would likely be beyond my budget
@@thelionheartexperience421 , hopefully mirrorless cameras will get cheaper soon 🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
Dankie vir jou Video
Love my R6 en Sigma 60-600mm sport
Nou net vandag van my Kruger trip afegkom en R6 het soos n machine gewerk
Fantasties!!!
Villiers sal jy dit dalk oorweeg om n video te maak hoe jy jou R6 gestel het vir wildlifephotography?
@@zrphotography, dis op my to-make lysie vir 2022 😎👍🏻
Awesome kan nie wag nie 👌👌
Thanks for the insight, very useful. As you are a new owner of the EOS R6 what lenses would you recommend for wildlife photography? P.S. Really enjoying your Botswana series, will be visiting there next year, so taking notes.
Hi G Babe. The Canon 100-500mm RF is a great lens for wildlife, as is the Canon 100-400mm mkii, which I use with an adapter.
I’m glad you’re enjoying the Botswana series 🥳
@@TheSafariExpert Thank you
@@gbabe6014, my pleasure
Hah what? 5D and D850 have terrible low light capabilities.
No, they don’t.
@@TheSafariExpert In comparison to the R6 and R3, yes. Another reason for mirrorless is better lenses in the case of Canon.
@@frostybe3r, the R6 and R3 may have better low light capabilities, which one would expect, but to call the 5Dmk4 and D850’s “terrible” is a bit of a stretch 😏
@@frostybe3r, I do like the new Canon RF lenses a lot 👍🏻😎
@@TheSafariExpert Hah yeah perhaps, I've ordered the Canon EOS R3, only using an EF 500 f4 MK2 lens however, planning to eventually purchase an RF 600 f4.