At 9:40 why not cash final fortnue? You will get the extra turn after the rankle players turn and can still trigger dawn of the dead for infinite turns.
Summary / Spoilers: You cast Dockside and got miles ahead of the table after a greedy keep with no red mana. They board wiped to try and maintain parity, but the card they used to do it gave you lands so you retained a mana lead. Then the opponents fed you cards through ghostly pilferer, and you got all of the opponents to concede through extra turns (i.e. the opponents would rather play a new game than watch someone play solitaire). I really like Obeka, but I think it was questionable to showcase this game in particular.
Do you think I shouldn't have shown this game because of one or more of those reasons??? Even if that is the case, I still would for the following reasons: 1. Getting lucky is just part of the game. Almost all games have a good portion of luck being the reason why a player wins the game. Most players just don't like to admit it. 2. This is currently a hobby for me and that, combined with the time it takes to edit/record means i don't have the luxury of choosing between games to showcase. So, for better or worse, the games you see are how the deck will play on average. 3. A number of win conditions often result in really long turns being taken (ever played against a Teysa or Yarok player popping off lol???). I don't mind if players concede because of it, but I don't think it's something that should be frowned upon or hidden, as if it's a shameful part of the deck.
Great game
At 9:40 why not cash final fortnue? You will get the extra turn after the rankle players turn and can still trigger dawn of the dead for infinite turns.
That was definitely a viable play and probably the better line to take considering the boardstate 🙂
Really felt like you were the underdog until that last turn chain.
Even with 3 dockside triggers?
Summary / Spoilers:
You cast Dockside and got miles ahead of the table after a greedy keep with no red mana. They board wiped to try and maintain parity, but the card they used to do it gave you lands so you retained a mana lead. Then the opponents fed you cards through ghostly pilferer, and you got all of the opponents to concede through extra turns (i.e. the opponents would rather play a new game than watch someone play solitaire).
I really like Obeka, but I think it was questionable to showcase this game in particular.
Do you think I shouldn't have shown this game because of one or more of those reasons??? Even if that is the case, I still would for the following reasons:
1. Getting lucky is just part of the game. Almost all games have a good portion of luck being the reason why a player wins the game. Most players just don't like to admit it.
2. This is currently a hobby for me and that, combined with the time it takes to edit/record means i don't have the luxury of choosing between games to showcase. So, for better or worse, the games you see are how the deck will play on average.
3. A number of win conditions often result in really long turns being taken (ever played against a Teysa or Yarok player popping off lol???). I don't mind if players concede because of it, but I don't think it's something that should be frowned upon or hidden, as if it's a shameful part of the deck.