And one thing: some of best players around history they had 1 hit like the best shot. But for roger to have best drive and slice top 3 serve bolley top 3 dropshot maybe in top 3 too.... Just so many hits in the top of tenis in only 1 person: is unbelieve able
Nadal TOYED with Fed at Roland Garros. He made Fed look like dummy, and denied him GOAT status by blocking him, in his prime, from achieving a calendar-year Grand Slam.. Then again, clay was Fed's Achilles heel: He won only 5 of 38 red-clay Masters tournaments entered.
Roger toyed and bagelled Nadal 6-0 frequently, including 2007 to end Nads 81 match clay streak. Any era would have been weak against Roger’s peak, even grass dominated wood racquets era with his classic and timeless style game and grips. Federer could take his game and beat the best even in this era. Novak and Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Novak and Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90 Nadal overall dominated Fed on red clay. While Fed once won a match at the minor tournament Hamburg was (known for freak winners due to the effect of North Sea salt on the playing surface), it doesn't take away from the fact that Nadal beat Fed regularly at the tournament that matters: Roland Garros. Particularly humiliating was Nadal's beating of Fed in the 2008 Roland Garros final: 6-1, 6-3, 6-0. That was followed by Nadal beating Fed in the 2008 Wimbledon final, thus beating Fed on his best surface during Fed's prime. That amounted to dethroning Fed as Nadal became #1 ranked. Finally, in 2009 Nadal beat Fed on hardcourt in the AO final, reducing Fed to a crying wimp at the awards ceremony.😂 With that AO triumph Nadal 'de facto' ended Fed's prime.
@@danbotez1307 Nadal is lucky girls and women like Chris Everett and Monica Seles showed him to grunt hard and use two hands. And weak juniors showed him to use a western grip. And racquet and string technology to make Tennis playable for Nadal’s lesser skills. Federer could take his classic game, grips, strokes and all court skills and beat the best in any era, even the distant past which has to be included in the phrase “greatest of ALL Time”. Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require two hands, extra grunting, western grip, the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings, and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90 An H2H wining record of 24-15 of Nadal vs. Fed, including 8-6 on outdoor hardcourt, is not due to luck, but to overall domination. I know it hurts Fed's groupies that Nadal denied Fed GOAT status, but that is the unvarnished truth.
Federer won multiple slams without losing a set. Novak failed to do it. Everyone got toyed against Roger’s peak. Roger would have toyed with even the grass dominated wood racquets era with his classic and timeless style game and grips. Novak and Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Novak and Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90😂 yes ofc 😍 I love Federer hé is à god not human . I have poster in my room you know and even if hé kill my familly i Will always love him ❤❤
Federer really was a tennis genius, no other player could hit shots that would completely surprise and destabilize his opponents like he did.
And one thing: some of best players around history they had 1 hit like the best shot. But for roger to have best drive and slice top 3 serve bolley top 3 dropshot maybe in top 3 too.... Just so many hits in the top of tenis in only 1 person: is unbelieve able
1:42 The whip / racket head speed on this forehand is still so fast even in slow motion
The GOAT 👏
7:15.... I love the French commentator....it is extraordinary. We were wondering what he was going to do....the opponenent still wonder to this day 🤣
Roger, my idol!
fed is a quiet player👌
A lot of them other guys are making all that noise and still getting their butts kicked. Federer is a Disciplined Player ! My Favorite !
No words.
It’s actually insane!
Federer is quite excellent.
If this doesn't show the Fed is GOAT, I don't know what is.
This is why Federer is the best!
Nadal TOYED with Fed at Roland Garros. He made Fed look like dummy, and denied him GOAT status by blocking him, in his prime, from achieving a calendar-year Grand Slam..
Then again, clay was Fed's Achilles heel: He won only 5 of 38 red-clay Masters tournaments entered.
Roger toyed and bagelled Nadal 6-0 frequently, including 2007 to end Nads 81 match clay streak. Any era would have been weak against Roger’s peak, even grass dominated wood racquets era with his classic and timeless style game and grips. Federer could take his game and beat the best even in this era. Novak and Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Novak and Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90 Nadal overall dominated Fed on red clay. While Fed once won a match at the minor tournament Hamburg was (known for freak winners due to the effect of North Sea salt on the playing surface), it doesn't take away from the fact that Nadal beat Fed regularly at the tournament that matters: Roland Garros. Particularly humiliating was Nadal's beating of Fed in the 2008 Roland Garros final: 6-1, 6-3, 6-0.
That was followed by Nadal beating Fed in the 2008 Wimbledon final, thus beating Fed on his best surface during Fed's prime. That amounted to dethroning Fed as Nadal became #1 ranked. Finally, in 2009 Nadal beat Fed on hardcourt in the AO final, reducing Fed to a crying wimp at the awards ceremony.😂
With that AO triumph Nadal 'de facto' ended Fed's prime.
@@danbotez1307 Nadal is lucky girls and women like Chris Everett and Monica Seles showed him to grunt hard and use two hands. And weak juniors showed him to use a western grip. And racquet and string technology to make Tennis playable for Nadal’s lesser skills. Federer could take his classic game, grips, strokes and all court skills and beat the best in any era, even the distant past which has to be included in the phrase “greatest of ALL Time”. Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require two hands, extra grunting, western grip, the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings, and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90 An H2H wining record of 24-15 of Nadal vs. Fed, including 8-6 on outdoor hardcourt, is not due to luck, but to overall domination. I know it hurts Fed's groupies that Nadal denied Fed GOAT status, but that is the unvarnished truth.
@@danbotez1307sorry, but even Grandpa Fed beat Claydal in literally every match from 2014 onwards 😂😂.
Only Novak toy with Federer
Top 3 didn’t toy with each other, as much as with others. Djokovic much too monotonous for that.
Federer won multiple slams without losing a set. Novak failed to do it. Everyone got toyed against Roger’s peak. Roger would have toyed with even the grass dominated wood racquets era with his classic and timeless style game and grips. Novak and Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Novak and Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90😂 yes ofc 😍
I love Federer hé is à god not human . I have poster in my room you know and even if hé kill my familly i Will always love him ❤❤