CSB Single Column Handcrafted Bible Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 64

  • @SirMillz
    @SirMillz Рік тому

    I got the bonded leather one. Love the layout. I've yet to start using it as I've really been enjoying the NASB2020 wide margin reference

  • @jakeham4017
    @jakeham4017 3 роки тому +3

    I wish that Cambridge and Schuyler follow this beautiful setting, thank you for the review.

  • @markw5144
    @markw5144 Рік тому

    Just ordered one. I like Bibles with heft. haha

  • @red58impala
    @red58impala 3 роки тому +2

    Nice review Randy. I just received my copy today. I'm looking forward to digging into this soon.

  • @johnblum2829
    @johnblum2829 3 роки тому

    Excellent review Randy.

  • @bosse641
    @bosse641 3 роки тому +7

    So nice the single column layout. The way to go imo. Would love this with a 12 font and made in a free nation.

  • @dallasmckinley
    @dallasmckinley 3 роки тому +4

    The two copies of this that I’ve had were very different in their cover leather. The first was returned as the cover was a bit misaligned on the text block. The second copy is perfect and a very pronounced grain. Love this big bible!

  • @JG4AU
    @JG4AU 2 роки тому

    Wish I would have known how much I loved single column before ordering my CSB study Bible. 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @Yesica1993
    @Yesica1993 3 роки тому +1

    I've never read the CSB, but that is a very lovely Bible. Looks clear & easy to read for extended time. Not one to carry with you, of course. But looks wonderful for home reading.

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 роки тому

    They now make CSB in Quentel. But I have a v x v and other good ones. Not so expensive.

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 роки тому

    I generally don't like single column but THIS is very attractive. Love the layout.

  • @rodsummers4743
    @rodsummers4743 3 роки тому +1

    Pagination is pretty close between WM and Personal Size (versus Pastor's). The difference is primarily due to some slight changes in Proverbs in the text from 2017 to 2020.

  • @heshimucolar7174
    @heshimucolar7174 Рік тому

    Hi, how do you compare to Schuyler? I love my Schuyler, but they don't have the CSB. I want this type of paper and leather quality. The readability is perfect, and the size is helpful.

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  Рік тому

      This one compares well to Schuyler. It's maybe one notch under at the most. So if I gave Schuyler a 10, I'd give this a 9 or 9.5.

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 роки тому +1

    I have a CSB in 10 point with comfort print and references and hi lites
    In red. Quite readable and legible.

  • @ymshao
    @ymshao 2 роки тому

    Hi Randy, will you be reviewing the upcoming Holman handcrafted KJV?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  2 роки тому

      Yes. I should have that one soon.

    • @ymshao
      @ymshao 2 роки тому

      @@BibleBuyingGuide Great!

    • @ymshao
      @ymshao 2 роки тому +1

      @@BibleBuyingGuide Randy, looking forward to your review on Holman KJV handcrafted. By the way, do you think it is leather-lined in Holman CSB handcrafted?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  2 роки тому +1

      @@ymshao yes, it should be leather-lined. That's one of the elements of the hand-crafted series.

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 2 роки тому

    I PREFER 2 COLUMNS BUT THIS IS NICE.

  • @ymshao
    @ymshao 2 роки тому

    How is its goatskin compared to that used in Cambridge bibles?

  • @JAdamsMinistry
    @JAdamsMinistry 2 роки тому

    Strange question perhaps, however, I’ve read many reviews about a strange, unpleasant odor on these Bibles. Some say it’s the process used on the leather. Did you notice this at all? Considering it for a present. Overall, it looks like an incredible value for those who enjoy the CSB. Another great review by the way. Greatly appreciate your reviews brother.

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks Johnny! Mine didn't have a strong odor, but it was noticeable.

    • @JAdamsMinistry
      @JAdamsMinistry 2 роки тому

      @@BibleBuyingGuide thanks Randy!

  • @john3_14-17
    @john3_14-17 3 роки тому +2

    This is a very nice looking Bible inside. One thing I will say, however, is that the Handcrafted logo on the box doesn’t match the aesthetics of the Bible inside at all. The Bible is a normal high-end Bible. The box gives the impression of a more rugged, western-looking Bible. (edit - this doesn't make the Bible worse I just thought it was an odd business choice)

    • @claudiabailey5302
      @claudiabailey5302 3 роки тому +1

      That’s not what I thought when I got my handcrafted bible. I have no idea what a western looking bible is but I am a Brit 😂

    • @john3_14-17
      @john3_14-17 3 роки тому

      @@claudiabailey5302 It's subjective as always. I guess if I were to describe it, it would be...
      - Distressed Looking Leather Cover
      - A slab-serif font like what's in the Cameo or Turquoise. The font in the Cameo is a Clarendon font, a type of font popular during the Old West days for wanted posters, and other posters and signs.
      - Spine stamping to match the aesthetic
      To me (a male American), the elegant, graceful Bible on the inside doesn't match a the "Handcrafted" logo, which is big, bold, and loud. The font looks similar to that of "The Mandalorian". That show is a space western. The designs around the logo remind me of Native American geometric designs found in everything but high-end Bibles, including this one. So the branding seemed odd to me. But whatever works for them! I also think the Holman logo looks more like a logo for men's jeans than a Bible logo.

  • @shuttergirlUK
    @shuttergirlUK 3 роки тому +2

    Randy, I forgot to ask - do the leathersoft versions of this have the same paper/text block as this handcrafted goatskin...or are they a different paper?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому +1

      I'm not sure. I'll ask my contact at Lifeway.

    • @timwilkins2008
      @timwilkins2008 3 роки тому +1

      I have both of the VBV and SCWM in bonded leather. It is the same block and pagination as the premium. The VBV has 3 ribbons while the SCWM has only 2. The paper quality appears to be the same GSM.

  • @HenryPipes
    @HenryPipes 3 роки тому

    I think the biggest flaw of this Bible is it’s size. This Bible is huge. Why not cut out the wide margin and make it a bit slimmer? 32 gsm perhaps? There is already the CSB VBV which is also pretty large. We need some more medium sized CSB Bibles.

  • @lisabarron869
    @lisabarron869 3 роки тому +1

    Do you think the handcrafted series will offer a thumb index option?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому

      I haven't heard any mention of it, so probably not.

  • @shuttergirlUK
    @shuttergirlUK 3 роки тому +1

    Great review Randy, thank you! Landed here from looking for single-column easier-to read translation for daily use. Can I ask if there are any single column NLT Bibles, other than the Caxton?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks! The only other single-columns are the journaling editions and the Filament editions (the single column Filament uses the same layout as the Caxton). There are also a few study Bibles.

    • @shuttergirlUK
      @shuttergirlUK 3 роки тому +1

      @@BibleBuyingGuide Thank you so much - that's been so helpful! I found your reviews of the Filament and have now ordered one. Could I ask if the text block and font size the same as the Caxton?
      Since landing here this afternoon, I've also discovered the NLT Thrive Bible...which looks like a nice women's Bible. But I'm not sure if that's a sewn Bible, it looks just glued, from what I can see...🤔
      Thank you again, from across the Pond!

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому

      @@shuttergirlUK the Filament is practically the same Bible as the Caxton with a few tweaks. The Caxton is a rebound NLT Select. The Filament is that same Bible with a lesser expensive paper, the page number moved to a new location, and the references removed. Everything else is the same.
      Thrive is sewn. It's an excellent Bible. You can see it and our other NLT reviews here :biblebuyingguide.com/category/bible-reviews/bibles-by-translation/new-living-translation-nlt/

  • @edwardgraham9443
    @edwardgraham9443 3 роки тому +1

    This is nicely crafted and the layout is very good too. I've not fully warmed to single column Bibles yet, but I may get there. The CSB is a translation of which I have very little acquaintance, but it seems a lot of people love it. The craftsmanship of this Bible very nice. One question though, is this the 2020 CSB test or the 2017? I am aware that it was update in 2020 slightly. I'm a more traditional person, so I still not yet warmed to the and brothers and sisters type reading or having humankind instead of man sort of thing. Maybe of I, I'll give this translation more look. I do like that is has quite a bit of footnotes. All in all, this is a very good Bible.

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 роки тому

    CSB is a literal and readable bible.

  • @brotherarn
    @brotherarn 3 роки тому +1

    Randy what size would that Bible be if it were not a wide margin?

  • @naveenjebakumar4009
    @naveenjebakumar4009 3 роки тому

    Did you reviewed about NKJV friendship bible by Halmon publications?. Can I get the video or information about that?. What are the specifications and features of that.

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому +1

      Hi. I haven't reviewed that one. Sorry.

    • @naveenjebakumar4009
      @naveenjebakumar4009 3 роки тому +1

      @@BibleBuyingGuide Thank you so much for your reply. If you review it kindly notify me. 😇 ✌️

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 роки тому

    Is this similar to Schuyler traverse? Sp ?

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 роки тому

    What is font size ? 10.5 I heard it. Thanks.

  • @Mind_of_MATT
    @Mind_of_MATT 3 роки тому +1

    Translation aside, do you like this one as good as the Treveris?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому

      Good question! Both are made and designed well. I'd put the Treveris one notch above because of the higher-quality and more expensive materials. I also like its size. If I was going to highlight and make notes, I'd choose this CSB.

    • @Mind_of_MATT
      @Mind_of_MATT 3 роки тому +1

      @@BibleBuyingGuide Thanks for the perspective. I'm looking for a good paragraph style. Right now, that Treveris has my eye.

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому

      @@Mind_of_MATT the Treveris is an excellent choice.

  • @davidsutter1846
    @davidsutter1846 3 роки тому +3

    WHY printed in China??????????

    • @bosse641
      @bosse641 3 роки тому

      Exactly. So many foolish people in the Western world in our day and age. But that is what must be expected at the end of the age.

    • @Alarcahu
      @Alarcahu 3 роки тому

      $$$$ which is a pity. This item is a want rather than need (not the Bible, this format!) item so there’s not really an excuse.

  • @keithc1264
    @keithc1264 3 роки тому

    How does the size compare to the CSB Quentel?

    • @BibleBuyingGuide
      @BibleBuyingGuide  3 роки тому +1

      I don't have that one. Will the full yapp Canterbury work for comparison for what you need?

    • @keithc1264
      @keithc1264 3 роки тому +2

      @@BibleBuyingGuide Nor sure the size of the Canterbury. Thanks though. I think I’ll take a shot on the SCWM.

  • @CLM1987
    @CLM1987 3 роки тому

    Need that in KJV

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 роки тому +1

    I think Holman double column in CSB is on a par with Schuyler.

  • @Pastor-Brettbyfaith
    @Pastor-Brettbyfaith 3 роки тому

    Nice Bible, but the CSB is more of a paraphrase than a translation. I will not be getting this one. Do they have it in KJV?

    • @heshimucolar7174
      @heshimucolar7174 Рік тому

      It's not a paraphrase. Do the research. It''s word for word and thought for thought in plain modern American English. Good translation, among several others..

    • @Pastor-Brettbyfaith
      @Pastor-Brettbyfaith Рік тому

      @heshimucolar7174
      I said it is more of a paraphrase because the translators clearly stated that it was optimal equivalence. The KJV is formal equivalence, the NIV is dynamic, and the CSB is optimal. Let me restate my words and say that it reads more like a paraphrase.
      I have studied NT Greek and textual criticism for more than 33 years. Thanks for your comment.