Hello you beauties. Access all episodes 10 hours earlier than UA-cam by Subscribing on Spotify - spoti.fi/2LSimPn. Here’s the timestamps: 00:00 Intro 00:46 Why Does the Female Orgasm Exist? 07:26 The Purpose of Released Hormones after Sex 16:53 Is Too Much Dominance Bad? 22:19 How Sexual Selection Occurs in Humans 28:36 Unique Traits of Male Development 37:55 Are Male Traits Only Developed for Survival? 43:28 How Does Male-Male Aggression Attract Females? 54:47 Is there a Difference Between Male & Female Mental Capabilities? 1:04:26 Telling Someone’s Personality From Their Voice 1:18:06 Where to Find David
What a fantastic conversation. Most excellent at the part around 47:00 minute where Chris mentions a research paper which was actually D. Puts' one, in which they studied which is the best predictor of reproductive success (i.e. a term today implying who will have the most sexual opportunities, not necessarily the most kids). On the one side, female sexual selection and on the other male dominance. So they showed a number of photos of men to groups of men and women, photos of men who were actually known to them. Women had to rate the men in the photos by order of attractiveness, i.e. from the most sexy down to the least sexy. Men had to order the very same men by order of who seemed to them being more assertive, more dominant, more alpha, down to the least dominant, most beta. By all means while there could be some overlap, the men in the photos were categorised different and their positions in the two separate orders were different in spite of whatever random overlap. To put in more explicit terms, out of the 100 photos and on a scale of top-100 to bottom 0, a man that could be ranked say 95 on attractiveness scale by women could had been ranked as 62 on dominance scale by men and vice versa. So after one year the researchers gather up the men in the photos and asked them of their... sexual escapades and what they found out is that the men's dominance hierarchy was a better predictor of male sexual success than the female selection predictor.... i.e. even if it was the women doing the sexual selection, it was eventually the male position in the dominance hierarchy that played a higher role than the initial sexual attraction that women may feel towards the image of a man. That was not hard to guess. For years I have been claiming that female sexual selection played a far lower role than so many in the manosphere had been claiming - it was the male contest for dominance which played a far higher role. And note that this experiment was done in an era of complete sexual liberation and female emancipation so one would expect that male competition for dominance would had played a lower role, but no.... women are tuned to dominance by instinct. In the photos they could judge only judge the outer appearance, but in practice when they meet men, they see them how they behave and how others behave towards them, and thus they select differently from when they have to select among photos of men. But when we extrapolate to past times, we do the simple maths and deduct the fact that 80% of the "game" was all about dominance. Dominance against neighbouring enemy tribes but then also dominance over the males of the tribe within.
I don't think there's another top rated, highly entertaining podcast that has featured this much quality content about evolution and evolutionary psychology. Chris Williamson hits it out of the park once again with another fantastic guest choice. If you are a person who is getting your content exclusively from things like BuzzFeed, vanity Fair, people magazine etc you are missing out. It's hard to put into words the extent to which we have become so cordoned off into our own unique entertainment bubbles. On a related note, I wonder how this might affect our evolution moving into the future?
Could it be that it is a primal incentive to keep wanting sex, as this would produce more offspring? Considering the high infant mortality rate before modernity, mating as often as possible to produce as many viable descendants to continue the species. Seems like a good evolutionary way of encouraging mating. Dunno, just a thought.
@@chriscaldow1644 Hi how are you. Firstly, DNA is genes so no need ri write “DNA genetics”. Secondly I did write “Dunno”, but you are welcome to write a paper on it mate. After all you seem to have everything nailed down. Good lucky.
@@boldandthebeautifulgimbal2881 This was such a stupid reply to someone agreeing with you that it encouraged me to point it out to see how you treat actual dissent.
Female orgasm can be quite complicated. Woman who are stressed, don’t feel safe or not attracted to their partner usually experience very few orgasm. Orgasm for woman is a much physical as it is psychologically.
@Jane B Robbins when did I say women couldn't orgasm? I said its also a psychological thing as well. women who are stressed report having less orgasms with their partner. male and female orgasms are not the same.
YES MOST WOMEN HAVE PENT UP RESENTMENT TO MOST MALES NOW= FEMINISTS IN INSTITUTIONS OF ACHADEMIA =LEARNING=FEMINIST HATEFUL LECTURERS, EARLIER WOMEN TEACHERS THROUGOUT THEIR FORMATIVE YEARS,GOD HOW COULD THEY EVER CONQUER OR STOP THEIR NOW TAUGHT HATERD OF MALES=WHITE MALES EEVERYWHERE..=THIRD WAVE FEMINISM...YOU CAN'T EVEN GET TO FIRST BASE..THEIR WAS EVEN A TV SPECIAL IN AUSTRALIA ABOUT SHORT HAIRED FEMINIST LECTURER TELLING GIRLS NOT TO HAVE CHILLDREN BECAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND THIS HYPOCRIT SHOWED US HER WITH THE 3 CHILDREN OF HERS IN A PARK RIDING BIKES!!!!!!!!..
This would play into the study of the partner's masculinity playing into the role of femal orgasm. Healthy masculinity lets the woman feel secure in her femininity and not stress about the things the man needs to be taking care of if his drive isn't in line with masculine funsctions of the relationship.
After coming off my relatively brief stint on hormonal contraceptives, my orgasms were 100 times better. No, that's not an exaggeration. I had felt basically nothing when "orgasming" for those few torturous months (but felt plenty of everything else; I was like a parody of how PMS-ing women are supposed to be, but 4 weeks/month for 5 months straight), and not a week after I was off them again, it was like someone removed a heavy, wet cloth. It was like standing in the middle of a symphony after hearing a faint peep from a scurrying mouse.
Form follows function. My life experiences through my academic studies and my own life stories have revealed this bioligical principle to be very accurate in personal interactions. I operate in on the premise that women seek out a man who will protect her, and she reciprocates by nurturing the protective man. Gentlemen, thank you both so much for your discussion. I look forward to your podcasts, Chris.
I really appreciate the correction that Chris makes when he says "transitions to male" then changes that to "transitions to a man". Too many people have been using the terms male/female and man/woman interchangeably. It always irritates me when I hear people say transition to male/female, since that cannot be done. Thank you Chris, for being precise with your speech.
I think that might have to do with the position of the clitoris relative to the vaginal opening. If it’s close enough there’s plenty of clitoral stimulation during intercourse. If it’s not, then they need to get the stimulation another way. No idea why one would be evolutionarily selected for over another.
Depends on the woman, I had an ex that could have dozens per session, almost a hundred with one of her ex'es. Some other women just don't have it or extremely rarely have it, it's not the mate that exclusively influences it.
Seems too complex of a function for evolution to give any care for. Evolution isn't intelligent and doesn't create things to be fun goals for men. It is very mindless with the only set rule being "to increase reproduction" in one way or another. Almost everything about the design of humans is related to sex and sexual reproduction.
If the female orgasm didn't exist, we would have no reason other than reproduction to consider having sex with even our partners. Reproductive success would be less likely and birth rates would be consistently low. Especially because reproduction outside of deliberate female choice would be rape. Is it so out there to imagine that the female orgasm exists to encourage women to have sex and increase the chances of continuing the species?
Questions: 1) Do any other mammals experience female orgasm? Intercourse in the rest of the animal kingdom generally takes place over a very short period of time…usually what appears to be well short of a minute. 2) Is female orgasm possibly a way of screening for mates who are more “goal oriented”?
The second sounds extremely far fetched because the inherent difficulty of achieving female orgasm compared to the male one would have to be taken into account, and I don't see how that could happen
Are closest relatives are Bonobos. Their clits are actually bigger comparatively. The male and female are closer in size to each other.They love sex and have lots of same sex. They may even prefer it to penetration with males. This unites the women and they are actually matriarchal. The female mothers even select which women can breed with their sons. Chimps are similar but have regular size clits. More Males engage in homosexuality. They are big bromances and cohorts. This leads to the Alpha males having a group of male followers. The Alpha may give permission to their favorite brothers to be with the women of his group. They are more patriarchal.The size of males and females have greater disparity. Humans fall somewhere in the middle of these two groups in terms of general size and genitals.
@@janebrobbins8572 It should be noted, and few people acknowledge, that male orgasm can also become difficult to achieve as one gets up in years. Anxiety, stress, age related “issues”, in short, factors relating to what happens “between one’s ears” become bigger and bigger factors. It makes one appreciate the many factors that impact libido at any age and any gender or sexual orientation.
There is footage of the cervix pulsating during orgasm like it is trying to dunk itself in any sperm that is pooled in the vaginal canal. So would be to aid in fertilisation. Also probably some pair bonding factors as a women would be more likely to enjoy sex with a man that induces these feelings and would probably have sex more often with him which is likely to keep him around?
Chris, I warmly, politely and cordially suggest that you invite a woman scientist or researcher to talk about any women's sexualiy topic. Especially when you address the point of it (or any parts of it). 🙏 There's more to women's orgasm (or female orgasm, for the gender activists) than a biological function. There's emotional discharge in orgasm, hormonal balancing, there's the potential of fulfillment. With awareness and consciouness, comes this perspective on orgasm. For both men and women, might I add. There's been a slew of people (in history) castrating women's sexuality. In religion, society, family. In present day, many-a-woman struggle with expression and orgasm. I'm not refering to the boss babes / bitches, but to the more sensitive ones. Years of sexual suppression has done a huge number on women's expression. Lack of experiencing orgasm is one common result. Among others. And it is frustrating for many. This topic is brought up in coaching often. In this context, two men analyzing publicly the point of women's orgasm... To put it diplomatically, it most likely won't sit well with many women. Please consider inviting a woman scientist next time. 🙏🙏
This 💯 I’m sure it’s an interesting episode, I’ll gladly watch, but I second the sentiment. It’s such a nuanced topic that would so benefit from a first hand experience of a woman! But generally the whole orgasm gap worldwide btw men/women statistically is so upsetting🥺. When in fact a lot of the time women’s orgasms are meant to be stronger, more varied, longer and more likely to be multiple. All women should feel comfortable enough with their bodies to explore and enjoy them. Just goes to show that societal aspects play a large role in this (I mean some societies still routinely practice FGM to prevent female pleasure🥲…) and that we still have a long way to go, but I’m hopeful that it’s getting better
Have you even tried to watch the video? Please take your offended victim ideology elsewhere instead of covering it up with "cordially" and "politely". There is plenty a-woman discussing this topic on youtube and everyone who needs that can go and watch exactly that. What is this need of fixing everyone to be perfectly aligned with your world perception and needs? Can't you just take what the day brings and be grateful? Is oppressive patriarchy somehow oppressing your ability to do that? ..."most likely won't sit well with many women" All the three women that watched and chimed in here in comments seem perfectly content.
@@NGC1433 why so aggressive? It’s just a suggestion for this channel (not a demand either) to potentially also have a women’s point of view on a woman’s health/body topic, as a gay man’s point of view would also be important on a topic affecting gay men particularly. It would make for a good video that’s it. I enjoyed the video myself, as I’m sure many women. No need for “victim ideology” branding, especially if you’re a proponent of open discourse and suggestions - shutting down a conversation like that doesn’t seem right! Idk I think we can just all debate politely without personal attacks.
@@Mist3rEM haha ok thanks for that lecture on a female orgasm (smth I’m probably a bit more familiar as a woman, but ok…)! There is a difference between male/female experience of reaching a climax (not saying one is objectively better than other at all, but we can generalise about full body vs concentrated/ strength vs frequency of being able to reach it with ease etc, but ofc it’s not a hard rule for everyone). In fact Chris references a personal experience of this phenomenon by a trans person he spoke with previously in a video, which I found very interesting (anecdotal ofc, but still corroborating the studies about the differences). But hopefully we can at least politely agree that female orgasms are important and need studying:)
@@Mist3rEM glad you’re also concerned with the orgasm gap, but it seems you’re strangely competitive about which gender has it best 😅 I will take a look at the study you refer to. Either way based on my personal experiences as a woman who is very comfortable and in touch with my sexuality - female orgasms can be very strong, long lasting and come in quick succession compared to male partners on average and grow stronger and blend between clitoral / internal (frequency of multiple orgasm are one clear difference - check “Human Sexuality In A World Of Diversity“ on these points). Of course, clitoris is the main pleasure point and it’s well established that vaginal orgasms are linked to the clitoral stimulation from certain angles from inside (and yes these are much rarer and sadly often faked - another different societal problem). But I generally agree that myths that women orgasm from penetration alone etc are NOT helpful and that female orgasms need more studies and focus, as they’re just as important. Simply based on my experiences and those around me to me it’s seems that a lot of the orgasm gap is societal issues at play unfortunately and misconceptions (as you suggest). Let’s not try to compete , but focus on the points we agree on. Thanks again for the studies you referred to.
The episode with Dr Hill was great, this one not so much. Why would you title the episode as you did if most of it is off topic? It's misleading at best and click bait at worst. It seems to me that there is an attempt to target a certain type of audience, and the comments as of now certainly show some success in that regard. If your aim is just numbers then keep it up, but if you also care for quality of content and audience interaction then you should probably reformulate video and section titling, and think about the general direction of your line of questions. Best x
MW really needs to do an episode on the inability of men to get their female partners to orgasm. 5.4 minutes is the average male duration during sex. Pair bonding can't and won't take place in 5.4 minutes. 😂
Unfortunately, a tactician in MMA needs to watch Tank Abbot roll over 99 other fighters before they can even think about developing a tactic for defeating that all-out brawler.
About dominance trait in males & number of partners. The lower number of partners for attractive men could indicate that women want to lock them down for LTR.
It's really rare for a woman to achieve an orgasm with a man... which it's ironic considering that women are multi orgasmic...Women can get off easily through masturbation...the key is that sex is a really stressful activity for women...from preparation (anti conception measures to pregnancy expectations) to the actual act (anxiety, fear, guilt) for a woman it's easier to be relaxed by herself than with a male partner. The key for being s good lover is to help her to relax... it's not easy and depending on the circumstances not always possible...As someone with chronic anxiety I fully understand the frustration they must feel with men and with themselves. I can't enjoy sex either because all I have in the back of my head are negative thoughts.
Probably the most likely explanation. Evolution only cares about one thing: successful reproduction. Considering pain and pleasure are closely linked, it makes sense that women would need some incentive to allow a man to penetrate her, considering it would likely be unpleasant (even painful) without some form of pleasure incentive, even if full orgasm isn't reached.
How do we know the more dominant men in the study don't just feel more pressure to embellish their number of sexual partners, as part of dominance is just a bluff?
The title doesn't do justice to the depth and range of the conversation. In any case, it's fascinating and amusing that the importance placed upon many traits by males came about due to intra-sex competition and/or cooperation - females do not care about those traits nearly as much. Eye-opening.
I remember hearing a hypothesis that female's moaning during sex possibly could have evolved to invite other males in the tribe to participate...the idea being that when many males copulate with the females, paternity is uncertain. When paternity is uncertain, it serves all males in the tribe to want to protect and provide for the offspring (in contrast to Lions, for example, in which the paternity IS certain as the dominant male has exclusive access to the harem...and all new dominant males kill the small offspring of the previous dominant male). Could female orgasm have evolved simply to serve the purpose of causing females to moan?
@@sambadham1404 they addressed this - once humans had weapons it's too easy to take out the dominant one, so more cooperation became a survival skill for the dominant one.
@@sambadham1404 I thought that we saw through dna evidence that women are only twice as likely to have offspring than men. So our male ancestors that were successful did have children with an average of 2 women but it’s not as extreme as a lion pride. There must have been all kinds of single mated pair families in human mating before monogamy was promoted through modern religion. But then again religion is as old as humans probably so how would you prove that it’s the cause? Interesting to think about
What a stupid fucking theory lmao. Animals that behave this way have large testicles for massive sperm production, just look at chimps. Humans have small testicles because there isn't sperm competition. Also if you haven't noticed lots of men are extremely turned off by promiscuity and also refuse to raise another man's child.
I had an idea, I was wondering if the apparent sexyness of languages conferred a strategic advantage. I heard a survey of which languages were more sexy and in the top five three were romance languages. I thought was Latin sexy and did it confer a strategic competitive advantage for the Romans and their successors the French and Spanish.
It would be extremely difficult to establish that somehow the Latin language conferred Romans any competitive advantage in military terms, even more so when in Antiquity, the Romans themselves admitted that Greek was a far better sounding language than Latin. But Greeks too, who took so much pride in their language, never claimed that the language somehow gave them a military advantage. When people today mention Romance languages as better sounding they do so for two reasons : 1) Romance language, just like Greek, have alternating consonants and vowels and these tend to make for clear-sounding pleasant to the ear languages. 2) Romance languages are, in the modern era, related to summer holidays and good times so they create a pleasant, warm feeling when heard. But other than that, they do not necessarily give any visible advantage. It has more to do with culture-related reasons than the language itself. You see this for example with the English accent, i.e. the many different accents of English as spoken in the UK. It makes no difference outside the UK, e.g. in the rest of Europe but in USA, Canada and Australia it makes a noticeable difference since UK English accents (even the... Cockney one, LOL!) are perceived as more sexy, and more "upmarket", than US, Canadian and Australian ones. Which the British find hilarious, especially when they hear some Cockney man spitting out bars and Americans think he is some professor. LOL!
Object location memory is too real. I have to ask my wife where things are around the house all the time (after frantically searching around for ages first, naturally)
Dr. David Puts wife has done most of the research work..although he too was a part of it . but i guess her inputs would be more important and accurate.
I always thought female O was a way for females to judge the commitment of partners. Women often require more effort to reach the O, thus a man willing to invest in a woman's pleasure makes a more suitable partner.
RE: The indicators of dominance over other men : beards, deep voice etc that have more affect on men than women. Couldn't it simply be the obvious? For cavemen to breed with a cavewomen all he had to do was dominate the other men, and keep them at bay? And it's not a factor of getting a.woman to be more aroused by the caveman and willingly pick the more masculine man. The women simply didn't get a choice in the matter of sex. With the other cavemen cowered by the dominant male, she had no protection to stop sex.. She engaged in sex, or suffered the consequences. We've all seen countless nature documentaries about stags,lions, gorillas. The male that breeds is the one that scares off or kills the other males, its not about the males taking turns to hitting-on the females and each male waits his turn to see which one she picks.
It only occurs for you But not everybody's body is the same That's why it's very difficult to prove anything in these studies It's interesting but not really science
A woman I met cried after our 3rd time of having sex. I asked was she ok. She replied it was her first proper orgasm. We were into darkly erotic role play, something her hubby couldn’t deliver
Super dangerous and hurtful rhetoric. There are rape victims who experience orgasm and it is not because they feel safe or enjoy the violation and violence occuring. It is merely a biological response to stimulation. Period. Please be careful with your words as I couldn't imagine how gross this must make rape victims feel to read something this crass and untrue.
It is simple orgasm means pleasure what would be sex without pleasure ? ( with someone you have feelings for of course .) + procreation . Violent sex or sex with man type : playboy , lord and master , with narcissist or any other kind of pervert is out of the question . Do not know about other women but my children are born of love and they are loved . " Bez mięty ani rusz " ( No mint , no move .) When comes to men and my life some of men appeared fleetingly for a short time or a little longer . Personally I know myself very well to know that I will not share my life and space with a liar , cheater , narcissist , pervert and life actor . I can tell the difference between a poser and someone who behaves naturally and that is right I sense they are afraid of me because I am not a kitty or a barbie style that you can play with but a woman with a strong personality who exactly knows who she is . What I know is that you can find sex for money but you can not buy true love because true love is not for sale . Woman in love you can say is like blooming flower .
03:13 According to all the Salon-type papers I read "every woman will eventually have one", though I'm not sure if this is true or not, as usually those articles are written by activists and not scientists.
1:05 I personally know the answer but I'm not releasing that info because I don't get grant money. But I will say this researcher at least states he doesn't really know based on the evidence. ...which means he's a good researcher.
@@heidi22209 Actually - I was joking, just troll X-girl friends in general. I'm not sure, if any of mine have been atheists, but some have been less/not christian in belief. One of them - actually a very very sweet one, who in no way would benifit from a satanist culture - was pretty much "into" that. Looking back, she was very weak and group controlled, and brain washed by wicca crap a the metal music scene.. Her female "friends" were back stabbing vultures - and she knew it, and told me about it, but she didn't have the strength to leave them. I feel bad for her, and fear for her well being and future. :/
Women have it better when it comes to orgasms, they can experience longer and many times. And men don't always orgasm, ejaculation and orgasm are two different things.
I wonder how many organisms in women are achieved by thinking about men (Besides) the man their having sex with? Also the difference between just wanting to "Get off" vs have a child?
Could the Female Orgasm also be a REMNANT biological evolution (there’s a technical biological term for this). You can in some sense think of it as building on top of a house. Remnant of the old house may be there but it’s no longer serving a major function. Perhaps the female orgasm was just an earlier iteration of gene replication and somehow nature found that it was too hard 😅. And opted for the male orgasm which is way too easy to stain 🎉. I mean you just gotta rub it a bit. Not every function in us has to have had a major function. Perhaps it’s also that when something experience intense rubbing(physical and mental friction) it secretes? And the male is just simply an easier way to achieve it because of its rod-like nature?
Those who have them, will statisticly be more interested in having sex = have more offspring in general. They squeeze eveything together, so the ejaculation optimally (if the guy isn't to short) will more or less be shot right against the opening of the uterus, forcing (some of) the sperm into it. That's just a couple of physical pros of her having one. For the guy, the longer he keeps her "happy" the more time for her to "flush out" the last guys genes, and for they current guys sperm pump to pump it out to (look it up - it's from a scientific series I saw 20 years ago, which also talked about "the sperm war" going on in her. And if she has one/many, she will become more attachted to the guy, and he might feel inclined to hang around, resulting in her offspring having better chances of survival - ergo - female orgasms are possible, because they are good for our selfish genes.
@@CONEHEADDK interesting. Although I’m not sure how strong the correlation would be between liking sex & the need to procreate. The latter might be stronger regardless of pleasure. Most creatures urge to procreate seems strong enough on its own regardless of genital pleasure perse. And the female does have pleasure even even there is no orgasmic euphoria. As do males
@@IgnorancePleroma I'm convinced most/all(?) animals do things, bcz it feels better to do them, than to not do them. Which animals do you believe, are driven by the desire to have offspring some time in the future, more than to enjoy the "act" while doing it? Pigs have super long orgasms, and look how fx salmon behave while doing it - I think they looove it.. We eat, sleep, shit and "everything else", when it feels right - not because we think "I want to grow, I want to not be tired tomorrow, I want to have room for mote food" aso. I'm on Sam Harris' (and many other educated people) side about "the illusion of free will".
@@CONEHEADDK I’m sure the pleasure/pain principle always applies but it’s difficult to translate what every animal is “feeling” when they’re doing sexual acts. Maybe our close relatives we can infer but simply looking at a fish and judging it’s behavior based on our experience isn’t a sound enough way of exploring the question.
The octopus kills itself after having procreated so why not just continue to live and have sex? I don’t know too much about this but it’s interesting nonetheless
21:24 Especially in cultures that have only recently adopted agriculture, we saw a genetic bottleneck once agriculture got introduced, so I wonder how genetically different current Hunter-gatherer tribes are from us agricultural ("civilised") peoples.
@@nostalgicgirrl6053 Mother Nature armed and created men with this high testosterone driven sex drive and said to the women, “well ladies, sex isn’t as important but you get to choose who to have sex with. You have access to every men but they don’t! You get to choose who’s worth it. Here’s to being selective!”🥂 And we all laughed, and laughed… and laughed some more! The End
The female orgasm is a blessing from Allah. Islam is all about family life, getting married and having kids. And creating loving families and community. Allah is pleased and rewards the wife and husband that make love in a halal marriage. Muslim women wear the hijab in public but they do also shop at Victoria secret, for their husband at home. Peace
@@KD400_ This is one reason muslim women wear hijab. Muslim ppl believe it is protection for society/woman. As they cover their beauty it makes it more important for them to develop their personality, morals and intellect, to be defined by. This makes them pleasant to talk to and hold real conversations around shared values, beliefs and long-term life goals that are also deep and transcend in nature. It prevents ppl getting arrogant and getting a superiority complex based on superficial trates. Keeps ppl down to earth, modesty. Trys to prevent self entitlement and Princess complex. It trys to prevent the commercialisation/weaponising of "beauty", by it not being a publicly displayed and traded commodity/currency. Trys to give women a break from having to compete with each other on just beauty, in open public. That can cause feelings of jealousy. Helps to try to prevent an army of simps and street pestering. As her beauty is for HER and the special people SHE chooses in her life. Helps to try to prevent insecurities trying to maintain unrealistic and unsustainable beauty standards, that are forever changing and expensive to uphold. This can cause mental issues in people and the sense of constant judgement and body shaming from people that don't know you or care about your long-term good. Peace
@@kamrudkd yep I understand Islam. I might be Muslim although I don't know I always praise the one true God. Also Christians in the west used to do this but they have completely forgotten their history
@@KD400_ Both men and women have their inate nature. And there is good and bad in both. How we are conditioned in life from a very early age has a massive impact on the adults/ppl we become. If a woman grows up in a loving home, with a great/trusting relationship with her father and brothers, sees and trusts their masculinity and sees her father treating her mom well and her mom responding to it in a reseporcating and positive way. She knows what the standard of behaviour is expected for her community and they hold her accountable. If she suffers no childhood trauma and is not body shamed and judged on her beauty as he's starts her adolescents (wears a hijab). Often for women their first time can be full of trauma and a bad experience. So too, having relationships out side of a loving, committed relationship (marriage) can have negative effects. So don't sleep around. Add to that medications: antidepressants, birth control, alcohol, drugs and social media/gossip, consumer culture with a toxic bunch of "friends". And a high body count. Is it any wounder one would see perhaps a negative behaviour and conditioning. And could this sometimes manifest itsself in some perhaps "deviant" se***ul behaviour.?
Please talk more about actually useful topics rather than philosophizing over if a women can feel your dingaling and why she makes noises when she does or even if its ''usefull''. Some serious red pill rabbit hole, that really will not do people much good. My 2 cents.
@@ChrisWillx I wonder if the female orgasm is to facilitate non-monogamy by rewarding quick clandestine sex and giving it a much elevated chance of conception.
Hello you beauties. Access all episodes 10 hours earlier than UA-cam by Subscribing on Spotify - spoti.fi/2LSimPn. Here’s the timestamps:
00:00 Intro
00:46 Why Does the Female Orgasm Exist?
07:26 The Purpose of Released Hormones after Sex
16:53 Is Too Much Dominance Bad?
22:19 How Sexual Selection Occurs in Humans
28:36 Unique Traits of Male Development
37:55 Are Male Traits Only Developed for Survival?
43:28 How Does Male-Male Aggression Attract Females?
54:47 Is there a Difference Between Male & Female Mental Capabilities?
1:04:26 Telling Someone’s Personality From Their Voice
1:18:06 Where to Find David
Another great interview, Chris. Thanks!
@@SkandalouzStyle that is on your side, Steven.
A
What a fantastic conversation. Most excellent at the part around 47:00 minute where Chris mentions a research paper which was actually D. Puts' one, in which they studied which is the best predictor of reproductive success (i.e. a term today implying who will have the most sexual opportunities, not necessarily the most kids). On the one side, female sexual selection and on the other male dominance. So they showed a number of photos of men to groups of men and women, photos of men who were actually known to them. Women had to rate the men in the photos by order of attractiveness, i.e. from the most sexy down to the least sexy. Men had to order the very same men by order of who seemed to them being more assertive, more dominant, more alpha, down to the least dominant, most beta. By all means while there could be some overlap, the men in the photos were categorised different and their positions in the two separate orders were different in spite of whatever random overlap. To put in more explicit terms, out of the 100 photos and on a scale of top-100 to bottom 0, a man that could be ranked say 95 on attractiveness scale by women could had been ranked as 62 on dominance scale by men and vice versa. So after one year the researchers gather up the men in the photos and asked them of their... sexual escapades and what they found out is that the men's dominance hierarchy was a better predictor of male sexual success than the female selection predictor.... i.e. even if it was the women doing the sexual selection, it was eventually the male position in the dominance hierarchy that played a higher role than the initial sexual attraction that women may feel towards the image of a man.
That was not hard to guess. For years I have been claiming that female sexual selection played a far lower role than so many in the manosphere had been claiming - it was the male contest for dominance which played a far higher role. And note that this experiment was done in an era of complete sexual liberation and female emancipation so one would expect that male competition for dominance would had played a lower role, but no.... women are tuned to dominance by instinct. In the photos they could judge only judge the outer appearance, but in practice when they meet men, they see them how they behave and how others behave towards them, and thus they select differently from when they have to select among photos of men. But when we extrapolate to past times, we do the simple maths and deduct the fact that 80% of the "game" was all about dominance. Dominance against neighbouring enemy tribes but then also dominance over the males of the tribe within.
I don't think there's another top rated, highly entertaining podcast that has featured this much quality content about evolution and evolutionary psychology. Chris Williamson hits it out of the park once again with another fantastic guest choice. If you are a person who is getting your content exclusively from things like BuzzFeed, vanity Fair, people magazine etc you are missing out. It's hard to put into words the extent to which we have become so cordoned off into our own unique entertainment bubbles. On a related note, I wonder how this might affect our evolution moving into the future?
Been loving the content lately, I’m super interested in the evolutionary psychology as well
Could it be that it is a primal incentive to keep wanting sex, as this would produce more offspring? Considering the high infant mortality rate before modernity, mating as often as possible to produce as many viable descendants to continue the species. Seems like a good evolutionary way of encouraging mating.
Dunno, just a thought.
@@chriscaldow1644 easy way to say it's to continue human reproduction lol
@@chriscaldow1644 Hi how are you. Firstly, DNA is genes so no need ri write “DNA genetics”. Secondly I did write “Dunno”, but you are welcome to write a paper on it mate. After all you seem to have everything nailed down. Good lucky.
That and to help pair bonding, which helps the mother and father stay together long enough to raise the child into adulthood.
@@boldandthebeautifulgimbal2881 Dude... he's agreeing with you - chill
@@boldandthebeautifulgimbal2881 This was such a stupid reply to someone agreeing with you that it encouraged me to point it out to see how you treat actual dissent.
Female orgasm can be quite complicated. Woman who are stressed, don’t feel safe or not attracted to their partner usually experience very few orgasm. Orgasm for woman is a much physical as it is psychologically.
@Jane B Robbins well I’m specifically referring when with a partner. This is not male propaganda. This is well researched. Would you like sources?
@Jane B Robbins when did I say women couldn't orgasm? I said its also a psychological thing as well. women who are stressed report having less orgasms with their partner. male and female orgasms are not the same.
@Jane B Robbins why are you deleting your replies?
YES MOST WOMEN HAVE PENT UP RESENTMENT TO MOST MALES NOW= FEMINISTS IN INSTITUTIONS OF ACHADEMIA =LEARNING=FEMINIST HATEFUL LECTURERS, EARLIER WOMEN TEACHERS THROUGOUT THEIR FORMATIVE YEARS,GOD HOW COULD THEY EVER CONQUER OR STOP THEIR NOW TAUGHT HATERD OF MALES=WHITE MALES EEVERYWHERE..=THIRD WAVE FEMINISM...YOU CAN'T EVEN GET TO FIRST BASE..THEIR WAS EVEN A TV SPECIAL IN AUSTRALIA ABOUT SHORT HAIRED FEMINIST LECTURER TELLING GIRLS NOT TO HAVE CHILLDREN BECAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND THIS HYPOCRIT SHOWED US HER WITH THE 3 CHILDREN OF HERS IN A PARK RIDING BIKES!!!!!!!!..
This would play into the study of the partner's masculinity playing into the role of femal orgasm. Healthy masculinity lets the woman feel secure in her femininity and not stress about the things the man needs to be taking care of if his drive isn't in line with masculine funsctions of the relationship.
Chris, since you ask such great questions, and lots of your guest say they don't know, you should run your own research! 😀😘
He had a very curious mind! Love it!
I too am a researcher in this topic.
🧐🤔😄
After coming off my relatively brief stint on hormonal contraceptives, my orgasms were 100 times better. No, that's not an exaggeration. I had felt basically nothing when "orgasming" for those few torturous months (but felt plenty of everything else; I was like a parody of how PMS-ing women are supposed to be, but 4 weeks/month for 5 months straight), and not a week after I was off them again, it was like someone removed a heavy, wet cloth. It was like standing in the middle of a symphony after hearing a faint peep from a scurrying mouse.
Scurrying mouse lol
Beautifully written and happy for you 😉👌
Same, giving up the pill was such a good decision!
Form follows function. My life experiences through my academic studies and my own life stories have revealed this bioligical principle to be very accurate in personal interactions. I operate in on the premise that women seek out a man who will protect her, and she reciprocates by nurturing the protective man.
Gentlemen, thank you both so much for your discussion. I look forward to your podcasts, Chris.
I really appreciate the correction that Chris makes when he says "transitions to male" then changes that to "transitions to a man". Too many people have been using the terms male/female and man/woman interchangeably. It always irritates me when I hear people say transition to male/female, since that cannot be done. Thank you Chris, for being precise with your speech.
You can’t “transition” to being a woman either 😂 a WOMB-an is born with a womb.
Gender is not a real thing. There are two sexes: male and female. That's it. Anything else is delusional science-denial
Bollocks
@@WepGrade whats bollocks?
Is not a “man” an adult human male?
Many woman do not experience vaginal orgasm instead rather from oral sex, I wonder what’s the purpose of that…
@Jane B Robbins 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you are insane
I think that might have to do with the position of the clitoris relative to the vaginal opening. If it’s close enough there’s plenty of clitoral stimulation during intercourse. If it’s not, then they need to get the stimulation another way. No idea why one would be evolutionarily selected for over another.
To give guys goals. It's not that hard folks.
😆
I half disagree with the statement. I find the female orgasm makes it harder still.
I like the way you think.
Depends on the woman, I had an ex that could have dozens per session, almost a hundred with one of her ex'es. Some other women just don't have it or extremely rarely have it, it's not the mate that exclusively influences it.
Seems too complex of a function for evolution to give any care for. Evolution isn't intelligent and doesn't create things to be fun goals for men. It is very mindless with the only set rule being "to increase reproduction" in one way or another. Almost everything about the design of humans is related to sex and sexual reproduction.
If the female orgasm didn't exist, we would have no reason other than reproduction to consider having sex with even our partners. Reproductive success would be less likely and birth rates would be consistently low. Especially because reproduction outside of deliberate female choice would be rape. Is it so out there to imagine that the female orgasm exists to encourage women to have sex and increase the chances of continuing the species?
Questions:
1) Do any other mammals experience female orgasm? Intercourse in the rest of the animal kingdom generally takes place over a very short period of time…usually what appears to be well short of a minute.
2) Is female orgasm possibly a way of screening for mates who are more “goal oriented”?
The second sounds extremely far fetched because the inherent difficulty of achieving female orgasm compared to the male one would have to be taken into account, and I don't see how that could happen
@Jane B Robbins immediate feedback?
Are closest relatives are Bonobos. Their clits are actually bigger comparatively. The male and female are closer in size to each other.They love sex and have lots of same sex. They may even prefer it to penetration with males. This unites the women and they are actually matriarchal. The female mothers even select which women can breed with their sons.
Chimps are similar but have regular size clits. More Males engage in homosexuality. They are big bromances and cohorts. This leads to the Alpha males having a group of male followers. The Alpha may give permission to their favorite brothers to be with the women of his group. They are more patriarchal.The size of males and females have greater disparity.
Humans fall somewhere in the middle of these two groups in terms of general size and genitals.
@@janebrobbins8572
It should be noted, and few people acknowledge, that male orgasm can also become difficult to achieve as one gets up in years. Anxiety, stress, age related “issues”, in short, factors relating to what happens “between one’s ears” become bigger and bigger factors. It makes one appreciate the many factors that impact libido at any age and any gender or sexual orientation.
Shout out to you Chris, but that title IS CRAZY!!!
There is footage of the cervix pulsating during orgasm like it is trying to dunk itself in any sperm that is pooled in the vaginal canal. So would be to aid in fertilisation. Also probably some pair bonding factors as a women would be more likely to enjoy sex with a man that induces these feelings and would probably have sex more often with him which is likely to keep him around?
Chris, I warmly, politely and cordially suggest that you invite a woman scientist or researcher to talk about any women's sexualiy topic. Especially when you address the point of it (or any parts of it). 🙏
There's more to women's orgasm (or female orgasm, for the gender activists) than a biological function. There's emotional discharge in orgasm, hormonal balancing, there's the potential of fulfillment. With awareness and consciouness, comes this perspective on orgasm. For both men and women, might I add.
There's been a slew of people (in history) castrating women's sexuality. In religion, society, family. In present day, many-a-woman struggle with expression and orgasm. I'm not refering to the boss babes / bitches, but to the more sensitive ones.
Years of sexual suppression has done a huge number on women's expression. Lack of experiencing orgasm is one common result. Among others. And it is frustrating for many. This topic is brought up in coaching often.
In this context, two men analyzing publicly the point of women's orgasm... To put it diplomatically, it most likely won't sit well with many women.
Please consider inviting a woman scientist next time. 🙏🙏
This 💯 I’m sure it’s an interesting episode, I’ll gladly watch, but I second the sentiment. It’s such a nuanced topic that would so benefit from a first hand experience of a woman! But generally the whole orgasm gap worldwide btw men/women statistically is so upsetting🥺. When in fact a lot of the time women’s orgasms are meant to be stronger, more varied, longer and more likely to be multiple. All women should feel comfortable enough with their bodies to explore and enjoy them. Just goes to show that societal aspects play a large role in this (I mean some societies still routinely practice FGM to prevent female pleasure🥲…) and that we still have a long way to go, but I’m hopeful that it’s getting better
Have you even tried to watch the video? Please take your offended victim ideology elsewhere instead of covering it up with "cordially" and "politely". There is plenty a-woman discussing this topic on youtube and everyone who needs that can go and watch exactly that. What is this need of fixing everyone to be perfectly aligned with your world perception and needs? Can't you just take what the day brings and be grateful? Is oppressive patriarchy somehow oppressing your ability to do that?
..."most likely won't sit well with many women" All the three women that watched and chimed in here in comments seem perfectly content.
@@NGC1433 why so aggressive? It’s just a suggestion for this channel (not a demand either) to potentially also have a women’s point of view on a woman’s health/body topic, as a gay man’s point of view would also be important on a topic affecting gay men particularly. It would make for a good video that’s it. I enjoyed the video myself, as I’m sure many women. No need for “victim ideology” branding, especially if you’re a proponent of open discourse and suggestions - shutting down a conversation like that doesn’t seem right! Idk I think we can just all debate politely without personal attacks.
@@Mist3rEM haha ok thanks for that lecture on a female orgasm (smth I’m probably a bit more familiar as a woman, but ok…)! There is a difference between male/female experience of reaching a climax (not saying one is objectively better than other at all, but we can generalise about full body vs concentrated/ strength vs frequency of being able to reach it with ease etc, but ofc it’s not a hard rule for everyone). In fact Chris references a personal experience of this phenomenon by a trans person he spoke with previously in a video, which I found very interesting (anecdotal ofc, but still corroborating the studies about the differences). But hopefully we can at least politely agree that female orgasms are important and need studying:)
@@Mist3rEM glad you’re also concerned with the orgasm gap, but it seems you’re strangely competitive about which gender has it best 😅 I will take a look at the study you refer to. Either way based on my personal experiences as a woman who is very comfortable and in touch with my sexuality - female orgasms can be very strong, long lasting and come in quick succession compared to male partners on average and grow stronger and blend between clitoral / internal (frequency of multiple orgasm are one clear difference - check “Human Sexuality In A World Of Diversity“ on these points). Of course, clitoris is the main pleasure point and it’s well established that vaginal orgasms are linked to the clitoral stimulation from certain angles from inside (and yes these are much rarer and sadly often faked - another different societal problem). But I generally agree that myths that women orgasm from penetration alone etc are NOT helpful and that female orgasms need more studies and focus, as they’re just as important. Simply based on my experiences and those around me to me it’s seems that a lot of the orgasm gap is societal issues at play unfortunately and misconceptions (as you suggest).
Let’s not try to compete , but focus on the points we agree on. Thanks again for the studies you referred to.
Would have preferred hearing this from a woman.
I’ve researched this for over 40 years and have come to countless conclusions…
What are your various conclusions?
@@Therevolution7 some are real. None matter?
Thanks for creating this! Great content as always ✨
The episode with Dr Hill was great, this one not so much. Why would you title the episode as you did if most of it is off topic? It's misleading at best and click bait at worst. It seems to me that there is an attempt to target a certain type of audience, and the comments as of now certainly show some success in that regard. If your aim is just numbers then keep it up, but if you also care for quality of content and audience interaction then you should probably reformulate video and section titling, and think about the general direction of your line of questions. Best x
Fascinating stuff thank you!
It doesn't happen infrequently if you educate yourself and do some thorough research.
That is an excellent question.
That thumbnail is… something else
Hard to hear about this from a male, frankly.
MW really needs to do an episode on the inability of men to get their female partners to orgasm. 5.4 minutes is the average male duration during sex. Pair bonding can't and won't take place in 5.4 minutes. 😂
In my country it's 3.5 minutes
But it's enough to further the genome 😂
@@madonebo9249 😂
@@drkzilla truth
1 min of me it’s all it takes 😂
Unfortunately, a tactician in MMA needs to watch Tank Abbot roll over 99 other fighters before they can even think about developing a tactic for defeating that all-out brawler.
About dominance trait in males & number of partners. The lower number of partners for attractive men could indicate that women want to lock them down for LTR.
It's really rare for a woman to achieve an orgasm with a man... which it's ironic considering that women are multi orgasmic...Women can get off easily through masturbation...the key is that sex is a really stressful activity for women...from preparation (anti conception measures to pregnancy expectations) to the actual act (anxiety, fear, guilt) for a woman it's easier to be relaxed by herself than with a male partner. The key for being s good lover is to help her to relax... it's not easy and depending on the circumstances not always possible...As someone with chronic anxiety I fully understand the frustration they must feel with men and with themselves. I can't enjoy sex either because all I have in the back of my head are negative thoughts.
Because it helps with blocking pain.
Probably the most likely explanation. Evolution only cares about one thing: successful reproduction. Considering pain and pleasure are closely linked, it makes sense that women would need some incentive to allow a man to penetrate her, considering it would likely be unpleasant (even painful) without some form of pleasure incentive, even if full orgasm isn't reached.
@@nette9836 💯...
How do we know the more dominant men in the study don't just feel more pressure to embellish their number of sexual partners, as part of dominance is just a bluff?
The title doesn't do justice to the depth and range of the conversation. In any case, it's fascinating and amusing that the importance placed upon many traits by males came about due to intra-sex competition and/or cooperation - females do not care about those traits nearly as much. Eye-opening.
I remember hearing a hypothesis that female's moaning during sex possibly could have evolved to invite other males in the tribe to participate...the idea being that when many males copulate with the females, paternity is uncertain. When paternity is uncertain, it serves all males in the tribe to want to protect and provide for the offspring (in contrast to Lions, for example, in which the paternity IS certain as the dominant male has exclusive access to the harem...and all new dominant males kill the small offspring of the previous dominant male). Could female orgasm have evolved simply to serve the purpose of causing females to moan?
I believe that theory is mentioned in the book Sperm Wars ?
Interesting!
@@sambadham1404 they addressed this - once humans had weapons it's too easy to take out the dominant one, so more cooperation became a survival skill for the dominant one.
@@sambadham1404 I thought that we saw through dna evidence that women are only twice as likely to have offspring than men. So our male ancestors that were successful did have children with an average of 2 women but it’s not as extreme as a lion pride. There must have been all kinds of single mated pair families in human mating before monogamy was promoted through modern religion. But then again religion is as old as humans probably so how would you prove that it’s the cause? Interesting to think about
What a stupid fucking theory lmao. Animals that behave this way have large testicles for massive sperm production, just look at chimps. Humans have small testicles because there isn't sperm competition. Also if you haven't noticed lots of men are extremely turned off by promiscuity and also refuse to raise another man's child.
Is that guy in a college dorm room?
It's amazing how Mike Tyson's voice has changed over time
Is David podcasting from his dorm room?
Why is his office in a restroom?
I had an idea, I was wondering if the apparent sexyness of languages conferred a strategic advantage. I heard a survey of which languages were more sexy and in the top five three were romance languages. I thought was Latin sexy and did it confer a strategic competitive advantage for the Romans and their successors the French and Spanish.
It would be extremely difficult to establish that somehow the Latin language conferred Romans any competitive advantage in military terms, even more so when in Antiquity, the Romans themselves admitted that Greek was a far better sounding language than Latin. But Greeks too, who took so much pride in their language, never claimed that the language somehow gave them a military advantage. When people today mention Romance languages as better sounding they do so for two reasons : 1) Romance language, just like Greek, have alternating consonants and vowels and these tend to make for clear-sounding pleasant to the ear languages. 2) Romance languages are, in the modern era, related to summer holidays and good times so they create a pleasant, warm feeling when heard. But other than that, they do not necessarily give any visible advantage. It has more to do with culture-related reasons than the language itself. You see this for example with the English accent, i.e. the many different accents of English as spoken in the UK. It makes no difference outside the UK, e.g. in the rest of Europe but in USA, Canada and Australia it makes a noticeable difference since UK English accents (even the... Cockney one, LOL!) are perceived as more sexy, and more "upmarket", than US, Canadian and Australian ones. Which the British find hilarious, especially when they hear some Cockney man spitting out bars and Americans think he is some professor. LOL!
Object location memory is too real. I have to ask my wife where things are around the house all the time (after frantically searching around for ages first, naturally)
Don't bring just a protruding forehead to a knife fight. LOL
The title of this podcast mischaracterizes the body of the discussion. Too bad really as it is an interesting watch.
Dr. David Puts wife has done most of the research work..although he too was a part of it . but i guess her inputs would be more important and accurate.
I always thought female O was a way for females to judge the commitment of partners. Women often require more effort to reach the O, thus a man willing to invest in a woman's pleasure makes a more suitable partner.
51:50 Simply install a camera in a bar and film all interactions for a few years...
RE: The indicators of dominance over other men : beards, deep voice etc that have more affect on men than women. Couldn't it simply be the obvious? For cavemen to breed with a cavewomen all he had to do was dominate the other men, and keep them at bay? And it's not a factor of getting a.woman to be more aroused by the caveman and willingly pick the more masculine man. The women simply didn't get a choice in the matter of sex. With the other cavemen cowered by the dominant male, she had no protection to stop sex.. She engaged in sex, or suffered the consequences.
We've all seen countless nature documentaries about stags,lions, gorillas. The male that breeds is the one that scares off or kills the other males, its not about the males taking turns to hitting-on the females and each male waits his turn to see which one she picks.
As a 31 year old woman who experienced her first orgasm when I was 28... It only occurs because we feel SAFE with our partners.
Then why do so many victims of rape report having orgasms? That's as far from safe as you can be and yet it happens often.
@@TheLastAbacus adrenaline maybe? Just a guess..
It only occurs for you
But not everybody's body is the same
That's why it's very difficult to prove anything in these studies
It's interesting but not really science
A woman I met cried after our 3rd time of having sex. I asked was she ok. She replied it was her first proper orgasm. We were into darkly erotic role play, something her hubby couldn’t deliver
Super dangerous and hurtful rhetoric. There are rape victims who experience orgasm and it is not because they feel safe or enjoy the violation and violence occuring. It is merely a biological response to stimulation. Period. Please be careful with your words as I couldn't imagine how gross this must make rape victims feel to read something this crass and untrue.
It is simple orgasm means pleasure what would be sex without pleasure ?
( with someone you have feelings for of course .)
+ procreation .
Violent sex or sex with man type :
playboy , lord and master , with narcissist or any other kind of
pervert is out of the question .
Do not know about other women but
my children are born of love and they are loved .
" Bez mięty ani rusz " ( No mint , no move .)
When comes to men and my life some of men appeared fleetingly for a short time or a little longer .
Personally I know myself very well to know that I will not share my life and space with a liar , cheater , narcissist ,
pervert and life actor .
I can tell the difference between a
poser and someone who behaves naturally and that is right I sense
they are afraid of me because I am not a kitty or a barbie style that you can play with but a woman with a strong personality who exactly knows who she is .
What I know is that you can find sex for money but you can not buy true love because true love is not for sale .
Woman in love you can say is like blooming flower .
03:13 According to all the Salon-type papers I read "every woman will eventually have one", though I'm not sure if this is true or not, as usually those articles are written by activists and not scientists.
I think it functions to suck the life out of you, literally. It pulled so hard, my contraception almost came off completely
1:05 I personally know the answer but I'm not releasing that info because I don't get grant money.
But I will say this researcher at least states he doesn't really know based on the evidence. ...which means he's a good researcher.
They should lower the hoop for WNBA, like they lower the net for women's volleyball
People would have to watch WNBA for anyone to notice
Just proves there is a God. That's why we call out... oh God!
That could explain why all my fridgid bitter X-girl friends, were atheists.
@Jane B RobbinsCan you please explain why?
@@CONEHEADDK word. For real. Soulless women!
@@heidi22209 Actually - I was joking, just troll X-girl friends in general. I'm not sure, if any of mine have been atheists, but some have been less/not christian in belief. One of them - actually a very very sweet one, who in no way would benifit from a satanist culture - was pretty much "into" that. Looking back, she was very weak and group controlled, and brain washed by wicca crap a the metal music scene.. Her female "friends" were back stabbing vultures - and she knew it, and told me about it, but she didn't have the strength to leave them. I feel bad for her, and fear for her well being and future. :/
Women have it better when it comes to orgasms, they can experience longer and many times. And men don't always orgasm, ejaculation and orgasm are two different things.
Shouldnt u have a female on for this topic lol cheers.
I wonder how many organisms in women are achieved by thinking about men (Besides) the man their having sex with?
Also the difference between just wanting to "Get off" vs have a child?
Could the Female Orgasm also be a REMNANT biological evolution (there’s a technical biological term for this). You can in some sense think of it as building on top of a house. Remnant of the old house may be there but it’s no longer serving a major function. Perhaps the female orgasm was just an earlier iteration of gene replication and somehow nature found that it was too hard 😅. And opted for the male orgasm which is way too easy to stain 🎉. I mean you just gotta rub it a bit. Not every function in us has to have had a major function. Perhaps it’s also that when something experience intense rubbing(physical and mental friction) it secretes? And the male is just simply an easier way to achieve it because of its rod-like nature?
Those who have them, will statisticly be more interested in having sex = have more offspring in general. They squeeze eveything together, so the ejaculation optimally (if the guy isn't to short) will more or less be shot right against the opening of the uterus, forcing (some of) the sperm into it. That's just a couple of physical pros of her having one. For the guy, the longer he keeps her "happy" the more time for her to "flush out" the last guys genes, and for they current guys sperm pump to pump it out to (look it up - it's from a scientific series I saw 20 years ago, which also talked about "the sperm war" going on in her. And if she has one/many, she will become more attachted to the guy, and he might feel inclined to hang around, resulting in her offspring having better chances of survival - ergo - female orgasms are possible, because they are good for our selfish genes.
@@CONEHEADDK interesting. Although I’m not sure how strong the correlation would be between liking sex & the need to procreate. The latter might be stronger regardless of pleasure. Most creatures urge to procreate seems strong enough on its own regardless of genital pleasure perse. And the female does have pleasure even even there is no orgasmic euphoria. As do males
@@IgnorancePleroma I'm convinced most/all(?) animals do things, bcz it feels better to do them, than to not do them. Which animals do you believe, are driven by the desire to have offspring some time in the future, more than to enjoy the "act" while doing it? Pigs have super long orgasms, and look how fx salmon behave while doing it - I think they looove it.. We eat, sleep, shit and "everything else", when it feels right - not because we think "I want to grow, I want to not be tired tomorrow, I want to have room for mote food" aso. I'm on Sam Harris' (and many other educated people) side about "the illusion of free will".
@@CONEHEADDK I’m sure the pleasure/pain principle always applies but it’s difficult to translate what every animal is “feeling” when they’re doing sexual acts. Maybe our close relatives we can infer but simply looking at a fish and judging it’s behavior based on our experience isn’t a sound enough way of exploring the question.
The octopus kills itself after having procreated so why not just continue to live and have sex? I don’t know too much about this but it’s interesting nonetheless
¿Aren't men on average 10% taller (around 14 to 16 cm)? 7% taller is only 10 cm (using a 150 cm woman).
What if God Himself just wanted women to be as satisfied as men with no other utilitarian use.
oxytocin release
It's a mystery to most men chris
For men its little more than relieving themselves. But women fall in love through sex.
Men also fall in love through it if the woman is really good at it...
@@-haclong2366 nope
@@nickc3856 Become a better lover, if you really have that belief..
@@nickc3856 I bet you also "can feel if a woman simulates" - spoiler alert - you are wrong in both cases..
@@CONEHEADDK you're definitely projecting now 🤣
21:24 Especially in cultures that have only recently adopted agriculture, we saw a genetic bottleneck once agriculture got introduced, so I wonder how genetically different current Hunter-gatherer tribes are from us agricultural ("civilised") peoples.
55:20 Guess I married a masculine woman, my wife sucks at remembering directions. 😂
I know, it's averages, but still...
They might regulate periods. You don't want to waste precious eggs, if there is not desire there.
Isn't an orgasm like when you smell a food flavor and you salavate.
That’s a very, very lame orgasm then
Short version: None. In other words, even nature doesn't care about female orgasm.
Short version : joy. The only purpose is joy.
may your god bless your future wife. she’s going to be having a miserable marriage 😂
@@nostalgicgirrl6053 Mother Nature armed and created men with this high testosterone driven sex drive and said to the women, “well ladies, sex isn’t as important but you get to choose who to have sex with. You have access to every men but they don’t! You get to choose who’s worth it. Here’s to being selective!”🥂 And we all laughed, and laughed… and laughed some more!
The End
@Jane B Robbins pls get therapy.
@@Nah-ah 😂😂 love it.
The female orgasm is a blessing from Allah.
Islam is all about family life, getting married and having kids. And creating loving families and community.
Allah is pleased and rewards the wife and husband that make love in a halal marriage.
Muslim women wear the hijab in public but they do also shop at Victoria secret, for their husband at home.
Peace
Don't drag your bullshit religion here.
That's y Islamic countries r doing exceptionally well compared to the west
@@KD400_ This is one reason muslim women wear hijab. Muslim ppl believe it is protection for society/woman.
As they cover their beauty it makes it more important for them to develop their personality, morals and intellect, to be defined by.
This makes them pleasant to talk to and hold real conversations around shared values, beliefs and long-term life goals that are also deep and transcend in nature.
It prevents ppl getting arrogant and getting a superiority complex based on superficial trates.
Keeps ppl down to earth, modesty. Trys to prevent self entitlement and Princess complex.
It trys to prevent the commercialisation/weaponising of "beauty", by it not being a publicly displayed and traded commodity/currency.
Trys to give women a break from having to compete with each other on just beauty, in open public. That can cause feelings of jealousy.
Helps to try to prevent an army of simps and street pestering. As her beauty is for HER and the special people SHE chooses in her life.
Helps to try to prevent insecurities trying to maintain unrealistic and unsustainable beauty standards, that are forever changing and expensive to uphold.
This can cause mental issues in people and the sense of constant judgement and body shaming from people that don't know you or care about your long-term good.
Peace
@@kamrudkd yep I understand Islam. I might be Muslim although I don't know I always praise the one true God. Also Christians in the west used to do this but they have completely forgotten their history
@@KD400_
Both men and women have their inate nature. And there is good and bad in both.
How we are conditioned in life from a very early age has a massive impact on the adults/ppl we become.
If a woman grows up in a loving home, with a great/trusting relationship with her father and brothers, sees and trusts their masculinity and sees her father treating her mom well and her mom responding to it in a reseporcating and positive way.
She knows what the standard of behaviour is expected for her community and they hold her accountable.
If she suffers no childhood trauma and is not body shamed and judged on her beauty as he's starts her adolescents (wears a hijab).
Often for women their first time can be full of trauma and a bad experience. So too, having relationships out side of a loving, committed relationship (marriage) can have negative effects. So don't sleep around.
Add to that medications: antidepressants, birth control, alcohol, drugs and social media/gossip, consumer culture with a toxic bunch of "friends". And a high body count.
Is it any wounder one would see perhaps a negative behaviour and conditioning.
And could this sometimes manifest itsself in some perhaps "deviant" se***ul behaviour.?
Please talk more about actually useful topics rather than philosophizing over if a women can feel your dingaling and why she makes noises when she does or even if its ''usefull''.
Some serious red pill rabbit hole, that really will not do people much good. My 2 cents.
This channel is not for you
@@apres-lachute8718 Yeah - the three most forbidden taboos - money, IQ and size - bcz they all are soooo important, and barely changable for most..
I didn’t know this video wouldn’t do me any good. Thanks for having everyone’s best interest at heart bro ❤
@@ChrisWillx I wonder if the female orgasm is to facilitate non-monogamy by rewarding quick clandestine sex and giving it a much elevated chance of conception.
Alex Valle this is not red pill, it's just evolutionary biology, which is a main focus of this channel.