Terrific video! As I watched I felt as if I was almost there throughout the landing. All too often people tend to zoom in and out and focus on individual items rather than present the big picture. Nice work!
@@ccubsfan94 I don't fly the Embraer, but I find it fascinating how its pilots position their leg perfectly on the footrest, so they just barely don't get hit by the yoke
@@bahenbihen I have to be all the way back and seat reclined with a few grunts to get my feet up there usually. The yoke works great but depending on wind and how giddy the yoke moves around 200ft I pull my legs in close. Otherwise you get a good whack.
mja12685 - which headset do you have? I have the A20 and occasionally I have mic issues with it in the 175. I was thinking of switching to the XLR connector.
mja12685 - A couple captains I’ve flown with have the clarity headsets and really like them. Why do you fly manual speeds all the way to the ground? Don’t you use FMS speeds by the final approach fix?
CloudStreets in the E175 as you approach the terminal area the FMS will automatically start slowing the plane down. This could get you into trouble if ATC needs you at a certain speed so most pilots will switch to manual speeds and just dial in the speed they need.
David Hood - the 175 will automatically slow to 250kts below 10,000, but it won’t go slower than that until you activate approach speeds by deploying flaps or by selecting “activate approach speeds” on the FMS. Then it will bug what ever speeds you have programmed based on your flap settings. This is a Republic airplane. Apparently they don’t use magenta approach speeds as policy. So, that’s why he’s on manual speeds. Seems like a good way to overspeed the flaps, but whatever you get used to I guess.
@@rayanaltowayan9558Actual limits are 400ft on takeoff, 50ft on an ILS, MDA for other approaches and 400ft on a visual. Most guys hang on to about 3k ft, sometimes 10 and occasionally up to the 20k ft but below rvsm. Just depends on the person and the workload. For landing, if visual most will have it off just after the final approach fix so about 2500 ft. We usually let the plane help us in actual imc on the instrument approaches unless the approach calls for no autopilot, which is why its good to practice. Most guys on an ils click off about 200 ft.
Autobrake is set as part of the descent checklist depending on runway length and condition. It's confirmed set on the approach checklist. It needs to be set to "Something," not "off."
Andrew Burke Actually, it doesn’t. We have discretion as per our SOP. We are just not allowed to set it to a position where there is no landing distance information returned by ACARS. SOP 10.6.3.2
He would be fired if the company found out. It's against company policy. There is no gray area or room for discussion on this topic. You think you're cute or you proved something since you saw someone break the rules. You did not.
quinnjim I agree with you that that is the policy for every airline (and the FAA), I was just disagreeing with your previous statement, because I have already seen too much irrefutable evidence to the contrary.
quinnjim ok... but how come I see more films from a 777 jump seats rather than seeing them from ERJ 145's don't try to bash regional airlines like that that's just right especially seeing that you could be a pilot yourself
Nice video, as an A&P on this aircraft it is nice to see another perspective
I thought this was a sim when I saw the thumbnail. I’ve been playing too much FSX
Lol I thought I was the only one who saw that
Is fsx steam better or Microsoft
@@nathanbrosh4589 Out of both your probably best with P3D 64bit
Damn....you can see the ILS profile on MFD, I wish I could have it in my EMB-145 lol That's amazing!
Looks like it's controlled via a thumb switch on the yoke. Excellent ergonomic engineering.
It’s an EMB-175, so it’s a different plane.
Nice approach and landing!
was thinking "woah he built a cockpit for his sim, that's cool" until I tried to figure out which network had such good voice quality :P
Terrific video!
As I watched I felt as if I was almost there throughout the landing.
All too often people tend to zoom in and out and focus on individual items rather than present the big picture.
Nice work!
Nice.
I always preferred that style of yoke, if there's no stick to be had.
Its nice, until you get your knee slapped by a frisky Captain on 8 kts of crosswind.
@@ccubsfan94 I don't fly the Embraer, but I find it fascinating how its pilots position their leg perfectly on the footrest, so they just barely don't get hit by the yoke
@@bahenbihen I have to be all the way back and seat reclined with a few grunts to get my feet up there usually. The yoke works great but depending on wind and how giddy the yoke moves around 200ft I pull my legs in close. Otherwise you get a good whack.
I’ll be flying this bad boy in a couple of years 😊
Dude all the way back to the "500 on speed sink__" days! I sometimes forget how much has changed since our "merging" aka flying Shuttle procedures lol
Sure is. Brickyard is Republic.
Cool. So you keep the A/T on till landing? That's pretty neat.
On airbuses (except maybe for the Airbus A220), this is the normal practice as the thrust levers are what engage and disengage the autothrottlez
Great Video and Nice Flying.
Great landing!
push the fucking carb heat in after you clear the runway. does anyone use checklist anymore?! sheeesh
Brendon Cisneros 😂😂😂😂😂
Carb heat???? BWAAAAHAHAHAHHA!
I makes me sad to see that the 175 cockpit is so quiet. ; >; 175>145
Why the delay for reverse thrust? New to this so don’t tear me apart
Niceee ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️
3:49 I’m really confused because I flew the erj-715 level d simulators before and they never had callouts
This is the plane I dream to fly when I'm older
Lukesfortnite101 Elo don’t fall for the plane, fall for the job. I’m now flying an MD-83 and couldn’t be happier.
mja12685 so according to you MD 80 > E 175? Just asking :)
@@mja12685 what you flying now? MD-83 got retired for delta i thought?
@@mja12685 MD 80 > E 175? WTH?
The great problem of the E175 or even the E135 is the panel, the panel is not intuitive.
my favourite airplane
nice job, no floating. hooRAH
the yoke looks like bike handle xD
Is there a reason you keep muting yourself with the PTT switch or are you confusing that for pitch trim?
CloudStreets I’m silencing the audio feedback from my mic. Professional courtesy.
mja12685 - which headset do you have? I have the A20 and occasionally I have mic issues with it in the 175. I was thinking of switching to the XLR connector.
CloudStreets uflymike is what I have. I am upgrading to the Clarity Aloft. That seems to be the gold standard.
mja12685 - A couple captains I’ve flown with have the clarity headsets and really like them. Why do you fly manual speeds all the way to the ground? Don’t you use FMS speeds by the final approach fix?
CloudStreets SOP prohibits the use of FMS speeds after the aircraft is in the landing configuration.
Nice vid
Is this on a flight sim?
no you dumbass
Why did you use manual speeds all the way o the runway?
CloudStreets in the E175 as you approach the terminal area the FMS will automatically start slowing the plane down. This could get you into trouble if ATC needs you at a certain speed so most pilots will switch to manual speeds and just dial in the speed they need.
David Hood - the 175 will automatically slow to 250kts below 10,000, but it won’t go slower than that until you activate approach speeds by deploying flaps or by selecting “activate approach speeds” on the FMS. Then it will bug what ever speeds you have programmed based on your flap settings. This is a Republic airplane. Apparently they don’t use magenta approach speeds as policy. So, that’s why he’s on manual speeds. Seems like a good way to overspeed the flaps, but whatever you get used to I guess.
Coffee, tea, or Ba Ba Booey?
Damn Covid, got me out here watching UA-cam on how to do my own damn job.
Pretty cool job you have there sir
@@rayanaltowayan9558 Thank you!
@@ccubsfan94 when do you guys normally engage and disengage the AP ?
@@rayanaltowayan9558Actual limits are 400ft on takeoff, 50ft on an ILS, MDA for other approaches and 400ft on a visual.
Most guys hang on to about 3k ft, sometimes 10 and occasionally up to the 20k ft but below rvsm. Just depends on the person and the workload.
For landing, if visual most will have it off just after the final approach fix so about 2500 ft. We usually let the plane help us in actual imc on the instrument approaches unless the approach calls for no autopilot, which is why its good to practice. Most guys on an ils click off about 200 ft.
What airline was this? American?
It's at MIA so most likely yes
Luke Hay republic
Envoy
Brickyard = Republic
Perdón la ignorancia pero full flaps?
This flight must have been done under Part 91 :)
Escobar international airport
ORBX FTX Global + Feelthere ERJ-175
No autobreaks?
The E-175 has auto brakes. I am surprised the 717 doesn’t have them though.
Thats an Embaer 170
Actually, it’s an American Eagle E-175.
Made in Brazil
fs2020
You might wanna try setting the autobrake next time.
Andrew Burke why’s that?
Autobrake is set as part of the descent checklist depending on runway length and condition. It's confirmed set on the approach checklist. It needs to be set to "Something," not "off."
Andrew Burke Actually, it doesn’t. We have discretion as per our SOP. We are just not allowed to set it to a position where there is no landing distance information returned by ACARS. SOP 10.6.3.2
Yeah Andrew. Go back to your Microsoft Simulator.
oh damn bro #rekt
Major airlines won't hire pilots who play with cameras in sterile cockpit. Just something to think about….
My last time jumpseating on United, the FO filmed the landing into LGA after asking for the Captain's permission. Just something to think about...
He would be fired if the company found out. It's against company policy. There is no gray area or room for discussion on this topic. You think you're cute or you proved something since you saw someone break the rules. You did not.
quinnjim I agree with you that that is the policy for every airline (and the FAA), I was just disagreeing with your previous statement, because I have already seen too much irrefutable evidence to the contrary.
quinnjim ok... but how come I see more films from a 777 jump seats rather than seeing them from ERJ 145's don't try to bash regional airlines like that that's just right especially seeing that you could be a pilot yourself
All the videos on UA-cam say different