Stephen Meyer: Darwin’s Doubt
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 бер 2019
- According to a nationwide survey, more than two-thirds of atheists and one-third of agnostics believe that “the findings of science make the existence of God less probable,” while nearly half of self-identified theists believe “the findings of science are neutral with regard to the existence of God.” But what if there is another option? What if the discoveries of science actually lend support to belief in God?
Taped at the 2019 Dallas Science and Faith Conference at Park Cities Baptist Church in Dallas sponsored by Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture.
Subscribe for more from Discovery Institute
/ @discoverysciencechannel
Check out our other great videos:
Check out other videos in this playlist
• 2019 Dallas Science an...
Did you know that a growing number of scientists doubt the Darwinian theory of evolution?
• Did you know that a gr...
At the Heart of Theistic Evolution, an Inescapable Contradiction
• At the Heart of Theist...
Mike Keas: Unbelievable (Playlist)
• Michael Keas Guides Yo...
Human Zoos: America’s Forgotten History of Scientific Racism
• Human Zoos: America's ...
============================
The Discovery Science News Channel is the official UA-cam channel of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. For more information visit www.discovery.org/id/
www.evolutionnews.org/
www.intelligentdesign.org/
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter:
Twitter: @discoverycsc
Facebook: / discoverycsc
Visit other UA-cam channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture
Discovery Institute: / discoveryinstitute
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer: / drstephenmeyer
The Magician's Twin - CS Lewis & Evolution: / cslewisweb
Darwin's Heretic - Alfred Russel Wallce: / alfredrwallaceid - Наука та технологія
Instead of focusing the camera on Stephen's face, stay switched on the slides! Killed the whole presentation by omitting the slides.
Dr. Meyer is in a league of his own. I haven't read his latest book, but Signature in the Cell was amazing. I was an atheist who believed in Darwinian Evolution until I went to college and took a lot off various biology classes. Microbiology was the clincher. I don't see how anyone who truly understands biology at that level can not see the obvious design. I don't know if my professors would be happy or appalled that they lead me away from blindly believing in something I was ignorant of to accepting intelligent design and eventually Jesus.
Signature in the Cell is the most fascinating thing I have seen in all my 58 years.
"There are no weaknesses in the theory of evolution"...Eugenie Scott. The "theory" is a hypothesis and it is weaker than a cooked noodle!
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.." Romans 1:22-28 suits well with the Atheist Scientist.
Stephen Meyer is a true inspiration and God is blessing his work. He has had to fight for a long time to gain a foothold, but now the world is taking notice. Great work, sir!
Newton wrote, "a little knowledge leads away from God, but much knowledge leads towards Him".
*_“The more I study science, the more I believe in God.”_* --- Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955), founder of modern physics (Theory of Relativity inter alia) and 1921 Nobel prize winner
That's Luis Pasteur I think
Darwin is not an atheist.He is a deist and believe god as first cause.Majority of scientist use his theory to be an atheist
"A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion." --Sir Francis Bacon
I happen to stumble across this. Listening it now for the 4th time.
Yeah it needs a few listenings to catch everything...
I love those who vehemently oppose Meyer, Tour and Behe and the cadre of SERIOUS scientists who KNOW that scientific materialism has major holes in its bucket that cannot be plugged. A serious logical premise that "what is most probable as we look at the facts?". Intelligent design is our best conclusion. As we go along, if proof of Macro Evolution appears, I will dismantle my prejudice at this point towards a supreme intelligence that created it all. That really is the corner that atheists and Darwinian militants hate to be painted into......after they admit multiverses, eternal matter cannot answer the question "where did all the information come from that began it?".
It's really evil that kids in public schools don't get to hear this side of origin of life.
@@logicalatheist1065 You are literally teenage atheist incarnate. I guarantee you go around telling people your IQ is 140. We both know you don't hold a PHD and Dr. Meyer brings up criticisms that are, at the very least, worth noting. It's so painful seeing you guys shill for your religion harder than any Christian, cuz I used to think like you. Wake up, dude. Get off reddit
It's not evil, it's censorship.
@@stevendapra9465 - It’s both evil & censorship. They are not mutually exclusive things.
This would generate critical thinking. That doesn’t help us dumb down America.
the atheist religion has won the schools unfortunately
Meyer is so good at explaining complex issues to the common man.
That is his forte. You always get the gist of what he is saying.
I'm a layman when it comes to biology, but even I can understand that any mutation has to be sudden, complete, and functional in order to be favored by natural selection. Otherwise it will be lost within a couple of generations.
It’s interesting how evolutionists utilize identical insult tactics of neo-marxists against anyone who disagrees with their world view and Darwinist dogma
Because they come from the same source.
I'm not even Christian, but I have a lot of respect and the original teaching(unedited versions)/correct interpretations(of current edited texts) are very deep with wisdom, truth, and I believe, most probably correct historical account(s). I have watched this countless times and other videos and after the current book I'm reading, will read Darwin's doubt and buy his new book when it comes out in 2020. It sounds legit and from what I see, when he goes toe to toe with atheists, they never are able to dismantle his arguments. Until I check the sources given in Darwin's Doubt, these debates, his talks, his support from other scientists give me great confidence in what he's saying. I hope he's right and if he is, I hope he really gains momentum helps change science.
The consensus in the scientific community is that " Intelligent Design is not science and has no place in a science curriculum. "
Is just Creationism by another name.
Interesting to note that Darwin, in principle, today would not be a Darwinist.
I always like listening to Dr Meyer. Always learn something new. Ty.
I’m a Muslim, and I always was brainwashed to think that we evolved and I knew it contradicts my religion and I wanted to learn more about Darwin’s theory, and I just picked up your book. You seem like an inspirational person
I’m a Muslim as well and felt the exact same way. Im majoring in biology and understood the mechanisms of evolution, my professor in high school would slander religion all the time and kept copies of Richard Dawkins books in his bio class (I have no idea why). Was the real atheist type. The rest of my professors are great, but just push the biology textbook that species evolved and became more complex etc…
I never truly believed it. Some of it made total sense for sure, like Darwin’s Finches. Or maybe human races (there’s hadith and Quran verses about Nabi Adam’s descendants separating and occupying different lands). On the other hand it doesn’t explain new biological systems? Biochemistry? Photosynthesis? I look at quantum mechanics and it’s beautiful.
I came to the conclusion that beauty is truth, truth is beautiful, and that ultimately leads to God. Every time you marvel at something in the universe you are marveling God’s creation and it’s a form of worship.
I also thought about the life of The Prophet (pbuh), all previous prophets, and the prophets family. The deep introspection in the past almost always concluded that there should be a Creator. This is explained beautifully by the story of Nabi Ibrahim, or Ahl-Kufah. They independently came to the conclusion that there should be a God.
There are so many other things I’d love to mention, like how the Quran said that there was a time when the Earth was bombarded by fiery rocks and brought us water and metal (I’m not sure if this is mentioned in the Bible), but I definitely should read the Quran more.
Imagine that you are a muslim and that this ideas have sneeked in your mind and that you live in a thirld world country how will you combat dout .You are fortunate to live near great universities.
@@anglaislangletaire2098 I live in the USA and I still cant voice it to my family.
@@mousasaab2652 I am a muslim born family myself. I came to the conclusion that beauty is perfection. Perfection is truth. The closer you are to perfection, then you are to truth and then god itself. The reason we worship beauty is because we perceive beauty as being awe, perfection.
I was raised not knowing God .... but always knew there was a God and the universe was alive
I like the Charles Marshall circular reasoning and evasion :
1. largely emerged : requires a motive force which in turn assumes something which generates that force
2. through the rewiring of the : requires an action of rewiring, which assumes an actor who performs the action
3. of the gene regulatory networks : requires the prior existence of a functioning regulatory network
4. of already existing genes : requires the prior existence of genes
So the new phyla emerged by the action of an unexplained force, acting in a rational fashion
in the framework of existing networks on prior materials.
What is never explained where the materials, the force, the plan of action, the intelligent actors and the goal
came from. Let me guess : from the multiverses and quantum fluctuations, right ?
Goodsarcasm
Drop the mic Stephen, drop the mic.
Excellent presentation.
Too many slides missed, but anyways this video presentation is amazing. Thank you for that!
Sorry, I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but you could probably still add the slides as this great video and will be watched many times in the future.
This man should be speaking to Coliseums...not just churches. He destroyed the myths that prevail in Darwinism and naturalism.
The dogma of Darwinism is stronger than the American flag, the church, etc. It can ONLY be presented in a church because almost no other place would accept it.
I love listening to Dr. Stephen Meyer. Such a fine writer, thinker, and presenter.
"Darwin hoped" is not scientific.
Excellent presentation! Too bad Dr. Meyer didn't go in depth in to "Irreducible complexity" as well. That with complete viewing of the slides at all time as well would have made this a 10/10.
So the Pokémon model of evolution is the most realistic one?
Great presentation. The one thing I've always wondered is how any life form can have a self-preservation instinct. Today's most educated scientists/engineers haven't got a clue how to produce a a self-preservation software subroutine that is common with most forms of life.
This self-preservation presents in itself another problem for evolution, if life has a self-preservation instinct, how is it possible that one life can evolve into another if this mechanism limits the destruction of the entire form of life?
I admire you and your work, Stephen. Thank you. Greetings from Argentina.
Wonderful info as always...just wondering if it would not take away from his presentation to show the slides a few seconds more--we can still hear his voice while looking at the slides ;-)
Mind blowing. May God bless Dr. Meyer.
I’m going to need to listen to this about 3 times for my small brain to suck it all in.
Stephen Meyer does a Great presentation Darwin’s Doubt. Pity that Darwin’s studies did understand intelligence and information, but he could not add to evolution theory or it would cast Doubt in his theory. So, this pass and just now many evolutionists are questioning the foundations of evolution wish is downhill now days.
I thoroughly appreciate the Discovery Institute reclaiming this topic for _science_ and rejecting the _religion_ of evolution.
exciting and revolutionary
Ok, I realize that this is not scientific, but I really enjoy listening to Steven Meyer. He has a manner of speech and a way of explaining things such that those of us that are educated in things other than biology can understand.
what do you mean by "not scientific"
He’s incredibly articulate
Although he’s got a goofy haircut
I have an analogy that I believe illustrates Dr. Meyer’s point a little better than his computer slide and more common to laymen.
We want to build a new car. Do we start by working out the details of the types of bolts and metal we use, or do we create a concept? We must first determine what we are trying to achieve, before we worry about what the upholstery or engine will be. Do you want a SUV or a sports car?
A bolt, is just like one protein in an animal. It may be used many times, but it is highly complex. The threads, how it engages the metal, how it handles vibration and how it handles corrosion are just some of the properties it needs to be successful.
Who believes if you develop a new bolt, that you are on your way to a new vehicle type? Who would drive a car if you found out the bolts were designed randomly? Do you believe by rearranging just a few bolts randomly that a compact car becomes a truck?
The design comes first, then the details. Why we can debate who the designer is, I don’t believe can argue the logic.
If you like this Man I would suggest ,that you listen To James Tour on you tube. He puts the nail in the coffin.
The mind is like a parachute. It only works if it's open.
Great work. Also a scientific theist myself. Would like to discuss plasma cosmology and discoveries by Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock. Thank you for the work.
when Stephen talked about "non-gradual modes of transitions" it is the biggest piece of evidence in my opinion. I cannot believe that fish could turn into monkeys, nor that dinosaurs can into birds. so many lacking fossils and no precursors for most animals.
Anyone else a little weirded out by the fact that the 4 amino acids correspond perfectly with YHVH? And all of the derivations thereof? And the whole universe being constructed by that word? Oh boy.
I love Meyer's work
thank you Dr. Meyer for putting the theory of intelligent design on sure footing once again.
Meyer and James Tour need to both be on Joe Rogan......millions of people need to hear the truth they are sharing.
Brilliant that explains a lot especially the end product.
23:40 I've long wondered about the transition from single-celled organism to multi-celled organism with differentiated, dependent cells that all share a universal DNA (meaning *EVER* cell has the DNA for the entire *ORGANISM.*
I love this guy! I wish he was my professor!
Fascinating!
Very well explained. Thank you
I think God would have made us to be able to do small changes based on the environment that we live. Like why people in hot and cold climates change slightly over time to adapt to those environments.
Awesome presentation. Clear, cogent and intensely interesting.
5:50 this is one of the things Lloyd Pye argued : can't explain the major innovations that occur. how was there a complex eye in the first animals?
he is convincing
Dr. Meyer is a treasure and so underated in his field. He has strengthened my faith so much by proving how logically consistent it is to believe in God.
Brilliant mind.
이 영상에 모든 언어의 자막이 달리길 바랍니다
Very interesting indeed but i would have liked to see all the slides as I was trying very hard to take notes! There's an awful lot to take in here - might need to view it some more!
If there were no weaknesses in the theory of evolution, wouldn't that make it a fact? And since evolution is ONLY a theory, how is it that they teach it as a fact?
This is probably the one time an atheist group would have open ears? 😂
Excellent video Stephen Meyer
Be nice to see the slides
Natural Selection was not even Darwin's idea. Lyle stole it from Wallace and gave it to Darwin and Wallace stole it from Patrick Matthews who published it in a horticulture magazine in 1831.
Fascinating stuff. Great to see a professional so enthusiastic about his work. Watched all the videos I could find, again (not a physics student, but very interested). More power to him. See him interviewed by Peter Robinson on "Uncommon Knowledge".
i also watch this man’s videos, but I recommend the book “on the origin of species”, it’s a great book actually and it’s not physics!! Or chemistry!
I just got this book yesterday! Very excited to read it.
I’ve added Some of your videos are on ithasbeenwritten.com also
Great stuff!
Good stuff. Thanks!
To me the absence of evolutionary organisms in living things today would prove Darwinian theory incorrect.
Thats why its called a theory, it cant be proven without some serious leaps of faith.
@@mrlakkie1612 it can't be proven because no one can literally go back in time and watch what was happened all we have is pure assumptions for satisfying human mind
What are you guys talking about with a Petri dish, a microscope and some pond water you can absolutely see evolution. To the point where you can make predictions on outcomes for the colonies.
@@gregyoungman false equilavence just because evolution happen in viruses it doesn't mean it will happen on humans
20 mins is pure gold
Why is it Lawrence K is unable to be open to these findings? Please go on the Joe Rogan show
How has he not been on Rogan yet??
Well, it’s certainly worth considering but I don’t know how you’d get funding for research on that
Awesome!
Thank you for such a great presentation. I would hope the considering of the aging of the earth would now be scientifically investigated: If the earth was completely covered by water (occured with the great flood) would not the pressure of the water change the carbon dating of all? And is it not possible that if all the animals and plants were created (most at the same time) and then the water covering the entire earth, (with that the movement of the water during the flood and its gradual resendance, then this would effect the earth’s fossil sediment layers and where you would find the fossils?
No
Luar biasa, saya sangat suka video ini ❤🇮🇩
This leads me to suppose that there is an internal pressure. Not a random reaction to events, but a coded response. Hmmmm.
20:25 ... 5 Years later ... One can not question Darwin nor government.
when a woman goes into labor she does not wait to see if a monkey will come out. Yehovah Tzeva'ot made man Adam in His image. Cat produces a cat, dog a dog, lemon tree a lemon. Practical logic.
Dawkins must be hiding somewhere right now.
you need dna for life and life for dna. so scientists are pulling at their own bootstraps and expecting lift off.
👑
🤍
love,
david
Why does one need DNA for life? ;-)
"Our uniform and repeated experience"...what I've been saying for years is: Intelligent Design is an axiom for the origin of complexity. Well done Dr. Meyer!
I like to recommend when someone is giving a lecture with slides. Please show the slide instead of the guy given the lecture. We can hear him just fine but we can't see the slide.
The second law of thermodynamics vs the creation of organic DNA information by undirected random processes. This spontaneous organic chemistry information probability problem shows how incredibly complex and difficult for organic molecules and DNA to occur by undirected random processes in our universe. For every chance for something to occur there is an equal and opposite chance for something to not occur unless there is an intelligent author? Right?
Does Dr Meyer acknowledge the dramatic effects of a large flood?
The millions of years paradigm, the geological column, the sudden explosion of different forms...it seems he is defending time to build the complexity of life similar to evolutionists - unless I’m totally missing something?
He points to his work with a German scientist on 17 identified explosions of new life in the past. Is he just ending in mystery?
Does Meyer address the energy landscape of protein folding?
Thanks again.
I know its a dumb question. How does any of this matter when we see the finch variation. Is the process that differentiates finches not the same process that would allow macro evolution?
It is. The claims currently in vogue with this lot (with no evidence) is that variation is entirely derived from extant dna and epigenetics. When pressed they can admit that beneficial mutations happen sometimes, then they tend to walk away from that at first opportunity.
Dawkins LOL What a joke. He's a Popular science book "Rock Star" nothing more...
Well done Steve 👏👏👏
Post the slides! :)
A huge thank you Dr. Stephen from Brazil!!!
I wish he explained what a "functional amino-acid combination" is in 39:10
Thank You - Well Done !!!
Nice to see someone like Steve pushing back the only way any of us move on is threw Christ I just can’t figure out why some of the smartest people in science can see creation of this whole planet n humans I have no education even I can see creation makes me scratch my head at least I know where me n my family are going when we pass on we were all saved together at one time what a blessing from god to know I’ll know my whole family for eternity
Read his books to get the details.
His presentation from a geological, physics and Christian background are a wonderful intersection pointing to God’s amazing creation. Genesis 1, Job 38, Romans 1.
sir can u plz give the answer of my question in one word .if u give answer it will be honour for me. And the question is...
Is life come from nothing? and is abiogenesis true or not ?
Please focus primarily on the slides
Focus on thè speaker secondary
Meyer is brilliant! So many others like James Tour are excellent as well. Dawkins... not so much 😂
Please edit this video to include a longer exposure of the slides. Too much focus on Dr. Meyer's face rather than the slides interferes with this presentation.
Here is why the bike-lock analogy isn’t the best analogy and actually gives favors to the evolutionary side of the argument. In that scenario, the thief won’t re-use previously used incorrect combinations because he has an intelligent mind. Nature doesn’t work that way. You would also have to factor in the likelihood that a previously used combination would re-emerge (unlikely, but just as unlikely that the correct combination would be found as well) with no limit as to how many times it can re-emerge. Imagine that after ever new try, the thief’s memory was wiped and he didn’t remember what combination he previously used.
This information should enter into the broad public sphere. This would have a major impact on the mental strongholds in people's minds, opening people up for the gospel. Genesis is key.
He is brilliantly fascinating!!!!!!!!!!!